DOCSLIB.ORG

A Profile of Brent

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Profile of Brent The 2011 Census A Profile of Brent 1 Ward Boundaries 2 Contents 1: Introduction – the 2011 Census and Brent 5 4·7: Passports held ........................ 16 1·1: The 2011 Census ....................... 5 4·8: Religion ................................ 17 1·2: Census Questions ...................... 5 5: Housing and Household Characteristics .. 19 1·3: Completion and follow-up ............ 5 5·1: Tenure ................................. 19 1·4: Calculating the final estimate ....... 5 5·2: Rooms, bedrooms, central heating 20 1·5: Changes to the Census since 2001 .. 6 5·3: Dwellings .............................. 20 1·6: What is released? ...................... 6 5·4: Household spaces and 1·7: Comparability of data with 2001 .... 7 accommodation type .................. 21 1·8: Who owns the 2011 Census 5·5: Household composition .............. 23 copyright? ................................ 7 5·6: Living arrangements ................. 25 2: A profile of Brent ............................. 8 6: Economic Position and Employment ...... 26 2·1: Brent .................................... 8 6·1: Unemployment........................ 26 2·2: An increasing population ............. 8 6·2: Employed .............................. 27 2·3: Households ............................. 8 6·3: Hours worked ......................... 27 2·4: Tenure .................................. 8 6·4: Occupations ........................... 28 2·5: Overcrowding .......................... 8 6·5: Industry ................................ 28 2·6: Density .................................. 8 7: Education and Training ..................... 29 2·7: Ethnicity ................................ 8 7·1: Qualifications and Students ......... 29 2·8: Religion ................................. 8 8: Transportation and Car Ownership ....... 31 2·9: Country of birth ....................... 8 8·1: Car or van availability ............... 31 2·10: Children .............................. 8 2·11: Lone parents ........................ 8 9: Health and Provision of Unpaid Care ..... 32 2·12: Economic activity................... 9 9·1: Health limiting day-to-day activities32 2·13: The elderly .......................... 9 9·2: Description of general health ....... 32 2·14: Health ................................ 9 9·3: Provision of unpaid care ............. 33 2·15: Migration ............................. 9 Appendix A: Country of Birth ................. 34 2·16: Transportation ...................... 9 A·1: Country of birth (detailed) .......... 34 2·17: Marital status ....................... 9 Appendix B: London Boroughs ................ 39 2·18: Response and return rates ........ 9 B·1: Inner London .......................... 39 3: Population ................................... 11 B·2: Outer London ......................... 39 3·1: Normal resident population ........ 11 Appendix C: Further Information ............ 40 4: Ethnic Diversity and Religion ............. 14 C·1: The ONS Census website ............ 40 4·1: Ethnicity .............................. 14 C·2: The NOMIS website ................... 40 4·2: Country of Birth ..................... 15 C·3: The Neighbourhood Statistics 4·3: Year of Arrival ....................... 16 website .................................. 40 4·4: Length of residence in UK .......... 16 C·4: The Greater London Authority Data Store website ..................... 40 4·5: Age of arrival ......................... 16 C·5: The Brent Data website ............. 40 4·6: National Identity..................... 16 3 C·6: Brent Council demographic Glossary .......................................... 41 information contact................... 40 4 1: Introduction – the 2011 Census and Brent in case they were missed at their usual 1·1: The 2011 Census address. Census Day was 27th March 2011. The Residents at CEs were each given their Census forms were to be filled in for all own copy of the questions for individuals to those staying overnight at the address. A allow them to fill the form out in private. usual resident is defined as someone in the Such individual forms were available on UK who had stayed or intended to stay for a request for residents in households too, if period of 12 months or more; or someone they required greater privacy. who was currently outside the UK but had a As each booklet only contained space for permanent address in the UK, and intended six individuals, further individual forms could to be abroad for less than 12 months. Non-UK also be requested for households larger than short-term residents are those born outside this. Similarly, if there were more than three the UK, who had stayed or intended to stay visitors present extra forms could be for between three and 12 months. Non-UK requested to record them. residents staying or intending to stay for less than three months were defined as visitors, 1·3: Completion and follow-up as were individuals at an address whose usual Households could return their forms address was elsewhere in the UK (these either by post or online, and the returns individuals would be included on the Census were tracked. For several weeks after Census form at their usual address). Day Census staff visited households that had Every household in England and Wales yet not returned a form, to elicit as many received a compulsory questionnaire in responses as possible. Note was made of advance through the post from the Office for households that appeared to be empty, and National Statistics (ONS). This contained a there was opportunity on the form to few questions about the household and a indicate a household was a second home or longer section with questions for each holiday address. Enforcement teams were individual. It was possible to request a form deployed collecting evidence to prosecute if one had not arrived, or it could be individuals actively refusing to return a form. completed online. After this period an independent survey Residents living in Communal was undertaken (the Census Coverage Establishments (CEs: these are managed Survey, or CCS), sampling roughly 1% of accommodation such as care homes, student postcodes, which visited all households in a halls, hotels, B&B’s with room for ten or postcode (not using the address list from the more guests, and so on) were visited by Census). The residents were asked to answer Census staff to collect the forms from a small number of questions, with prompts, individuals, although the individuals could to ensure all individuals were included. also fill theirs in online if they wished. Matching between these responses and the Census allowed the ONS to estimate how 1·2: Census Questions many people were missed by the Census The Census form contained 56 questions: (and/or the survey), and this was scaled up 14 were about the household; and there to estimate for all areas. A smaller survey were 42 for each member of the household was also undertaken asking the Census (although not everyone had to answer them questions again, to allow an estimation of all, for instance those who ticked that they how accurate the answers individuals gave had never worked were directed to skip the will be overall. questions about occupation), one was even left blank!1 Each form also had space for the 1·4: Calculating the final estimate basic details for any visitors who were As soon as forms started being returned present on Census Day; this allowed a check or filled in online, the answers began to be 1 processed into the digital database. Once all Question 17 was blank on forms in England, the field work was completed these answers but contained a question on ability to speak were compiled, and age and sex profiles for Welsh on forms distributed in Wales. all local authorities were produced, including 5 the extra missed households and individuals There were also some changes in the indicated by the CCS, and some other available responses to some questions. In the corrections for over-counting, and so on. ethnic group question a tick box was added These were then rigorously quality assured for “Gypsy or Irish Traveller” in the White by a panel by comparing with a number of category, and one for “Arab” in the Other national administrative datasets (such as the category. The question on marital status had School Census, Patient Register, and social a tick box for civil partnerships (which did security information). Where discrepancies not exist in 2001 as they have only been were a cause for concern they were recognised since 2004); this could also be investigated and adjusted as the evidence indicated in the section detailing the indicated. relationships between the different With the total numbers of households respondents. and individuals by age and sex calculated, the missing households and individuals for 1·6: What is released? each local authority area were distributed The actual forms are kept secure to be down to the smallest areas (Output Areas), released only after 100 years. In the to fill in the known non-responders from the meantime tables of summary statistics are address list (minus addresses accounted for released. Most tables will be available as a as empty, second addresses, and so on). The summary for Brent as a whole, although detailed characteristics of the households some will be available for wards and smaller and individuals are copied from similar areas too. In general the more detail a table nearby households. This is known as contains the less likely it is to be released for imputation, and includes adding missing smaller and smaller areas. characteristics for individuals
Load more

Recommended publications
  • London Borough of Brent Wembley Regeneration Area Energy Masterplan
    Intended for London Borough of Brent Document type Report Date 26th June 2013 Wembley Regeneration Area Energy Masterplan LONDON BOROUGH OF BRENT WEMBLEY REGENERATION AREA ENERGY MASTERPLAN LONDON BOROUGH OF BRENT Revision Final Version 3 Date 2013/06/26 Made by Anthony Riddle / Olof Jangsten /Mairead Kennedy/ Jens Moller Checked by Pernille M Overbye, Anthony Riddle Approved by Crispin Matson Description Wembley Regeneration Area Energy Masterplan Ref Report 12199431512-141-001 Ramboll Hannemanns Allé 53 DK-2300 Copenhagen S Denmark T +45 5161 1000 F +45 5161 1001 www.ramboll.com Ramboll Energy 60 Newman Street London W1T 3DA T +44 (0)20 7631 5291 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 1. Introduction 10 1.1 Introduction, Background and Context 10 1.2 Study Objectives 10 1.2.1 Evidence Base 11 1.2.2 Decentralised Energy System 11 1.2.3 Energy from Waste 11 2. Energy Demand Assessment 12 2.1 Methodology 12 2.3 Heating Demands in Existing Buildings 14 2.4 Heating Demands in new Developments 14 2.5 Cooling Demands 17 2.6 Cooling Demands in Existing Buildings 21 2.7 Cooling Demands in new Developments 21 3. Evidence Base 22 3.1 Methodology 22 3.2 Quantitative Analysis of Options 23 3.2.1 Building Emission Rates and Residual Compliance Requirements 24 3.2.2 Compliance Using Solar PV as a Proxy 29 3.2.3 Low and Zero Carbon Technology Investment Costs 33 3.3 Installed Capacity of Heating Plant Assets 34 3.4 Forfeited Lease Value of Heating Plant Assets 35 3.4.1 Cost of Heat production 35 3.4.2 Carbon Content of Heat delivered 37 3.5 Conclusions and Recommendations 38 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Wembley Central HA9 LONDON ENGLAND
    EATING AND DRINKING Wembley Central HA9 LONDON ENGLAND Brent WEMBLEY CENTRAL EATING & DRINKING 1 Contents 4 WEMBLEY CENTRAL 18 HILACC ROAD MAP Somali cuisine A map of all of the restaurants 20 JJ MOON’S 6 THE HIGH STREETS Wetherspoon’s pub About Wembley and Ealing Road 22 STATION21 8 AMERICAN CHARCOAL GRILL Indian restaurant and bar Turkish fast food 24 TASTE OF LAHORE 10 ARENA Pakistani takeaway Greek 26 THE ARCH 12 FLANNERY’S BAR Sports bar and South Indian Sports bar restaurant 14 FRUIT JUNCTION 28 URBAN CHOCOLATIER Juice bar Chocolatier 16 GURKHA VALLEY 30 YOUNG’S PEKING Nepalese street food Peking restaurant Wembley Central HA9 LONDON ENGLAND 2 EATING & DRINKING WEMBLEY CENTRAL WEMBLEY CENTRAL EATING & DRINKING 3 A N D O N R O A D A T V RN E A N B RES U P E RESTAURANTS AND BARS 1 ................... American Charcoal Grill BR 2 ........................................................... Arena O O 3 ......................................... Flannery’s Bar K C WEMBLEY A 4 .......................................... Fruit Junction V E PARK . 5 .......................................... Gurkha Valley L E A E A S T 6 ............................................................Hilaac N 4 0 LA L A 8 A N L 8 E T S .................................................... N 7 JJ Moon’s O 8 ....................................................Station31 V E NORTH ENUE Y 9 ....................................... R R Taste of Lahore V A WEMBLEY A 10 ...................................................... The Arch O W A E 11 .................................Urban Chocolatier D R I ........................................ P 12 Young’s Peking TLETON M E S CAS CAR PARKS T KING EDWARD E J A ......................................Lonsdale Avenue O V11 PARK F H B ..................................... Wembley Central N S D C .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Wembley Area Action Plan
    Wembley Area Action Plan Contents . FOREWORD 8 1. INTRODUCTION 10 2. STRATEGIC PLANNING CONTEXT 12 3. VISION AND OBJECTIVES FOR WEMBLEY 17 4. URBAN DESIGN & PLACE MAKING 19 5. BUSINESS, INDUSTRY AND WASTE 46 6. TRANSPORT 51 7. HOUSING 67 Wembley Area Action Plan Contents 8. TOWN CENTRES, SHOPPING, LEISURE AND 75 TOURISM 9. SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 82 10. RESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE 85 11. OPEN SPACE, SPORTS AND WILDLIFE 91 12. WEMBLEY HIGH ROAD 100 13. COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT AREA 106 14. WEMBLEY PARK/EMPIRE WAY CORRIDOR 119 15. WEMBLEY EASTERN LANDS 123 Wembley Area Action Plan Contents 16. WEMBLEY INDUSTRIAL ESTATES 128 17. DELIVERY AND MONITORING 131 18. APPENDIX A: SUPERSEDED POLICIES 139 19. APPENDIX B: GLOSSARY 140 20. APPENDIX C: LAND TAKE MAPS 144 21. CHANGES TO POLICIES MAP 155 LIST OF POLICIES WEM 1 Urban Form 31 WEM 2 Gateways to Wembley 34 WEM 3 Public Realm 36 WEM 4 Public Art 37 WEM 5 Tall Buildings 38 Wembley Area Action Plan Contents WEM 6 Protection of Stadium Views 40 WEM 7 Character of Olympic Way 43 WEM 8 Securing Design Quality 44 WEM 9 Offices 49 WEM 10 Low-cost Business Start-up Space 50 WEM 11 Protected Rail Sidings 50 WEM 12 Road and Junction Improvements to Stadium Access Corridor 55 and Western Access Corridor WEM 13 Western Highway Corridor 56 WEM 14 Car Parking Strategy 57 WEM 15 Car parking standards 58 WEM 16 Walking and Cycling 63 WEM 17 Event Related Transport 64 WEM 18 Housing Mix 69 WEM 19 Family Housing 70 WEM 20 Extra Care Housing 71 WEM 21 Wheelchair Housing and Supported Housing 71 WEM 22 Private Rented
    [Show full text]
  • Tokyngton Wards Are Major Destinations in Themselves in Addition to Being Residential Areas
    ELECTORAL REVIEW OF THE LONDON BOROUGH OF BRENT WARDING PATTERN SUBMISSION BY THE BRENT CONSERVATIVE GROUP RESPONSE TO THE LGBCE CONSULTATION NOVEMBER 2018 1 | P a g e Introduction Why Brent? During the current London Government Boundary Commission Executive (LGBCE) review process, it has become clear to us that since the previous review in 2000, warding levels have developed out of balance. Brent Council meets the Commission’s criteria for electoral inequality with 7 wards having a variance outside 10%. The outliers are Brondesbury Park at -16% and Tokyngton at 28%. Electoral review process The electoral review will have two distinct parts: Council size – The Brent conservative group welcomes to reduce the number of councillors to 57 from current 63. We appreciate that this will require some existing wards to be redrawn, and recognise that this will represent an opportunity to examine whether the existing boundaries are an appropriate reflection of how Brent has developed since 2000. In addition, the establishment of new developments such as South Kilburn Regeneration, Wembley Regeneration, Alperton and Burnt Oak and Colindale area. Ward boundaries – The Commission will re-draw ward boundaries so that they meet their statutory criteria. Should the Commission require any further detail on our scheme we would be very happy to pass on additional information or to arrange a meeting with Commission members or officers to run through the proposals. 2 | P a g e Interests & identities of local communities The Commission will be looking for evidence on a range of issues to support our reasoning. The best evidence for community identity is normally a combination of factual information such as the existence of communication links, facilities and organisations along with an explanation of how local people use those facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Facilities Appraisal in the London Borough of Brent: Executive Summary
    Community Facilities Appraisal in the London Borough of Brent: Executive Summary An Interactive Qualifying Project Submitted to the Faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science Prepared by: Matthew Gonsalves Rens Hayes IV Brittney Kawa Thomas Zajac, Jr. Submitted to: Professor Paul W. Davis, WPI Mathematical Sciences Department Professor Dominic Golding, WPI Interdisciplinary Global Studies Division Joyce Ip, London Borough of Brent Planning Service May 1, 2009 This report represents the work of one or more WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of completion of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these Brent Community Facilities Appraisal May 09 Abstract Brent Council acknowledges the importance of providing adequate community facilities to accommodate expected future growth. This project identified and characterized key issues associated with the current and future provision of community facilities in Brent –communication and outreach among Brent Council, facility suppliers, and users; mindset of facility managers; influence of community boundaries on facility use; youth needs; transportation and accessibility; and current policies. Recommendations include a “neutral” Council-run website to advertise available community space and a training program for facility managers. ii Brent Community Facilities Appraisal May 09 Acknowledgments Our project could not have been completed without the help of many people from Worcester Polytechnic Institute and from the Brent Council. We would first like to thank the sponsor of this project, Joyce Ip, a member of the Policy & Regeneration division of the Brent Council Planning Service, who helped us to define our interview and checklist items and then aided us in the analysis of our data.
    [Show full text]
  • The English National Stadium Project at Wembley
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts The English national stadium project at Wembley Eighth Report of Session 2003–04 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 19 January 2004 HC 254 Incorporating HC 812-i, Session 2002–03 Published on 10 February 2004 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £11.00 The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Current membership Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) (Chairman) Mr Richard Allan MP (Liberal Democrat, Sheffield Hallam) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Jon Cruddas MP (Labour, Dagenham) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow Pollock) Rt Hon Frank Field MP (Labour, Birkenhead) Mrs Cheryl Gillan MP (Conservative, Chesham and Amersham) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Nigel Jones MP (Liberal Democrat, Cheltenham) Ms Ruth Kelly MP (Labour, Bolton West) Mr George Osborne MP (Conservative, Tatton) Jim Sheridan MP (Labour, West Renfrewshire) Mr Siôn Simon MP (Labour, Birmingham Erdington) Mr Gerry Steinberg MP (Labour, City of Durham) Jon Trickett MP (Labour, Hemsworth) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) The following were also members of the Committee during the period of this inquiry. Geraint Davies MP (Labour, Croydon Central), Mr Nick Gibb MP (Conservative, Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) Mr George Howarth MP (Labour, Knowsley North and Sefton East) Mr David Rendel MP (Liberal Democrat, Newbury) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148.
    [Show full text]
  • WEMBLEY MASTERPLAN Supplementary Planning Document
    WEMBLEY Supplementary Planning Document MASTERPLAN WM WEMBLEY MASTERPLAN Supplementary Planning Document Adopted June 2009 Section 0 - Front Cover v7.indd 38 1/3/10 12:13:22 FROM VISION TO REALITY This masterplan has been prepared to guide developers and landowners in the area as the regeneration of Wembley moves forward over the next twenty years or more. A range of community benefits are envisaged as a necessary part of the regeneration and the current aspirations are outlined throughout the document. The document proposes ways in which the community benefit might be delivered by suggesting quanta of development, indicative building layouts and heights of buildings, amongst others. It should be noted that this document is not prescriptive and will be subject to variation over time, particularly in response to the adoption and revision of the Infrastructure Investment Framework, which forms part of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy. 3 Section 0 - Front Cover v7.indd 39 1/3/10 12:13:30 ForEWorD I am pleased to offer my support and endorsement for this new masterplan for Wembley. Wembley is one of London’s most exciting regeneration opportunities and the scale and pace of change in the last few years has been breathtaking, but this is only the beginning. With the successful opening of Wembley Stadium, The success of the adopted planning documents re-opening of Wembley Arena, the creation of and impetus provided by the opening of the Wembley Arena Square, and completion and stadium and development of the Quintain occupation of the first residential units, the Stage 1 application has now provided the shift in regeneration of Wembley is fast taking shape.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Spatial Characteristics of London
    Draft Economic Evidence Base 2016 2 The spatial characteristics of London 2.1 Main Findings z A number of different geographies can be used to examine London depending on what issue is of interest such as London’s administrative geography, its Functional Urban area, its connected built up area etc. z Agglomeration has led to a large clustering of economic activity in London, particularly in the area of the Central Activities Zone and the northern part of the Isle of Dogs. z It is calculated that the output of the Central Activities Zone, northern part of the Isle of Dogs and a 1km fringe around them stood at just over £179 billion in 2012, accounting for nearly 55 per cent of London’s output and just over 12 per cent of UK output. z Significant concentrations of employment can also be seen in central London which has grown over time, but with other areas such as Heathrow also being important areas of employment in London. z London represents a significant share of employment in the Greater South East and is a destination of employment for a large number of commuters. z Distinct clustering of sectors by employment was also discovered in London with the Central Activities Zone being important for most but with other areas such as Hillingdon around Heathrow showing clustering in Accommodation and food service activities employment. z London has seen a large growth in public transport usage but this has led to challenges such as overcrowding at a number of heavily used rail stations. Further, London dominates rail travel in Great Britain with it being found that in 2012/13, 62 per cent of all rail journeys in Great Britain started or finished in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality in Brent: a Guide for Public Health
    AIR QUALITY IN BRENT: A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Brent COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority November 2012 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4531 Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Brent CONTENTS Description Page How to use this document 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Air Pollution 3 2.1 External air pollution 3 2.2 Internal air pollution 6 3 Air Quality in LB Brent 8 4 Air quality impacts on health 12 4.1 Premature deaths 12 4.2 Vulnerable groups 13 4.3 Air pollution and deprivation 14 4.4 The Public Health Outcomes Framework 15 5 Health impacts in LB Brent 17 6 Co-benefits of improving air quality in London 20 6.1 Maximising the health benefits from improving air quality 20 6.2 Cost of the impact of Air Pollution 21 7 Policy and legal framework for improving air quality 23 7.1 EU Directive 23 7.2 UK air quality policy 23 7.3 Regional strategies 24 7.4 Local Authority responsibilities 26 8 Taking action 27 8.1 Actions taken by the Mayor 27 8.2 Borough level action 28 8.3 Individual action 30 9 Next steps 32 10 References 33 11 Glossary 35 12 Appendices 40 Appendix 1 – Annual mean concentration of pollutants 40 Appendix 2 – National air quality objectives 41 Appendix 3 – Actions for Londoners to mitigate and adapt to air pollution 43 Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Brent HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT Air quality is an important Public Health issue in London, it contributes to shortening the life expectancy of all Londoners, disproportionately impacting on the most vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMITTEE REPORT Planning Committee on 7 April, 2021 Item No 03 Case Number 20/4197
    COMMITTEE REPORT Planning Committee on 7 April, 2021 Item No 03 Case Number 20/4197 SITE INFORMATION RECEIVED 18 December, 2020 WARD Tokyngton PLANNING AREA LOCATION Wembley National Stadium, Olympic Way, Wembley, HA9 0WS Proposed variation of Condition 1 (event cap) of planning permission reference PROPOSAL 18/4307 (varied permission for the construction of the stadium, dated 07/03/2019), to allow up to 9 additional major non-sporting events per event calendar year. Planning permission 99/2400 was for the demolition of the original Wembley Stadium and clearance of the site to provide a 90,000-seat sports and entertainment stadium (Use Class D2), office accommodation (Use Class B1), banqueting/conference facilities (Use Class D2), ancillary facilities including catering, restaurant (Use Class A3), retail, kiosks (Use Class A1), toilets and servicing space; re-grading of existing levels within the application site and removal of trees, alteration of existing and provision of new access points (pedestrian and vehicular), and parking for up to 458 coaches, 43 mini-buses and 1,200 cars or 2,900 cars (or combination thereof). Application reference 17/0368 granted permission to vary condition 3 (event cap) of consent 99/2400 to allow 22 additional major Tottenham Hotspur Football Club events in between 1 August 2017 and 31 July 2018. Application reference 18/4307 granted permission to vary conditions 1 (event cap) and 2 (temporary traffic measures) of planning permission reference 17/0368 to allow 8 additional Major Tottenham Hotspur Football Club (THFC) events to May 2019. The current application includes the submission of an Environmental Statement.
    [Show full text]