Agronomy Research

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agronomy Research Agronomy Research Established in 2003 by the Faculty of Agronomy, Estonian Agricultural University Aims and Scope: Agronomy Research is a peer-reviewed international Journal intended for publication of broad- spectrum original articles, reviews and short communications on actual problems of modern biosystems engineering incl. crop and animal science, genetics, economics, farm- and production engineering, environmental aspects, agro-ecology, renewable energy and bioenergy etc. in the temperate regions of the world. Copyright: Copyright 2009 by Estonian University of Life Sciences, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic or mechanical, incl. photocopying, electronic recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission from the Estonian University of Life Sciences, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry. Agronomy Research online: Agronomy Research is available online at: http://agronomy.emu.ee/ Acknowledgement to Referees: The Editors of Agronomy Research would like to thank the many scientists who gave so generously of their time and expertise to referee papers submitted to the Journal. Abstracted and indexed: SCOPUS, EBSCO, CABI Full Paper and Thompson Scientific database: (Zoological Records, Biological Abstracts and Biosis Previews, AGRIS, ISPI, CAB Abstracts, AGRICOLA (NAL; USA), VINITI, INIST-PASCAL.) Subscription information: Institute of Technology, EULS St. Kreutzwaldi 56, 51014 Tartu, ESTONIA E-mail: [email protected] Journal Policies: Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonian Research Institute of Agriculture, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry and Editors of Agronomy Research assume no responsibility for views, statements and opinions expressed by contributors. Any reference to a pesticide, fertiliser, cultivar or other commercial or proprietary product does not constitute a recommendation or an endorsement of its use by the author(s), their institution or any person connected with preparation, publication or distribution of this Journal. ISSN 1406-894X CONTENTS G.A. Bich, M.L. Castrillo, L.L. Villalba and P.D. Zapata Evaluation of rice by-products, incubation time, and photoperiod for solid state mass multiplication of the biocontrol agents Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae .............................................................................................................. 1921 V. Bulgakov, V. Adamchuk, M. Arak and J. Olt The theory of cleaning the crowns of standing beet roots with the use of elastic blades ..................................................................................................................... 1931 V. Bulgakov, S. Ivanovs, M. Arak, V. Kuvachоv, L. Shymko and V. Bandura Experimental investigation of the work of a ploughing aggregate, operating according to the system ‘push-pull’ ....................................................................... 1950 V. Bulgakov, S. Ivanovs, J. Nowak, V. Bandura, A. Nesvidomin and Ye. Ihnatiev Experimental study of an improved root crop cleaner from admixtures ............... 1960 V. Chaloupková, T. Ivanova and A. Muntean Particle size distribution analysis of pine sawdust: comparison of traditional oscillating screen method and photo-optical analysis ........................................... 1966 G.N. Chupakhina, M. Shansky, A. Parol, N.Y. Chupakhina, P.V. Feduraev, L.N. Skrypnik and P.V. Maslennikov Comparative characteristics of antioxidant capacity of some forage plants of the Baltic Sea Region (a case study of the Kaliningrad Region and Estonia) ............. 1976 G. Di Vita, T. Stillitano, G. Falcone, A.I. De Luca, M. D’Amico, A. Strano and G. Gulisano Can sustainability match quality citrus fruit growing production? An energy and economic balance of agricultural management models for ‘PGI Clementine of Calabria’ ................................................................................................................ 1986 I. Diordiieva, L. Riabovol, I. Riabovol, O. Serzhyk, A. Novak and S. Kotsiuba The characteristics of wheat collection samples created by Triticum aestivum L/Triticum spelta L hybridisation .......................................................................... 2005 L. Dubova, I. Alsiņa, A. Ruža and A. Šenberga Impact of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) cultivation on soil microbiological activity ................................................................................................................... 2016 1918 I.Y. El Masri, J. Rizkallah and Y.N. Sassine Effects of Dormex (Hydrogen Cyanamide) on the performance of three seedless table grape cultivars grown under greenhouse or open-field conditions ............... 2026 M. Hromasova, A. Vagova, M. Linda and P. Vaculik Determination of the tension limit forces of a barley malt and a malt crush in correlation with a load size .................................................................................... 2037 J. Ivanovs and A. Lupikis Identification of wet areas in forest using remote sensing data ............................. 2049 L. Jankevica, O. Polis, A. Korica, I. Samsone, V. Laugale and M. Daugavietis Environmental risk assessment studies on new plant protection products which have been elaborated from coniferous tree bark ............................................................ 2056 S. Kalēja, A. Lazdiņš, A. Zimelis and G. Spalva Model for cost calculation and sensitivity analysis of forest operations ............... 2068 Y. Kretova, L. Tsirulnichenko, N. Naumenko, N. Popova and I. Kalinina The application of micro-wave treatment to reduce barley contamination ........... 2079 S. Kumar, J. Cerny and P. Kic Air-conditioning in the cabins of passenger cars ................................................... 2088 M. Militello, G. Sortino, G. Talluto and G. Gugliuzza Split water application for a water supply reduction in Callistemon Citrinus pot plant ................................................................................................................. 2097 V. Mironovs, M. Lisicins, I. Boiko and J. Karulis Tools for building production and woodworking made from the perforated steel wastes ............................................................................................................ 2110 L. Nadtochii, A. Orazov, L. Kuznetsova, A. Pinaev, L. Weihong, S. Garbuz and M. Muradova Identification of yeast species involved in fermentation of the Kazakh camel dairy product–shubat ............................................................................................. 2117 V. Obraztsov, D. Shchedrina and S. Kadyrov Film agents as an effective means of reducing seed shattering in Festulolium ..... 2130 V. Obraztsov, D. Shchedrina and S. Kadyrov The effect of herbicides on seed productivity of Festulolium ............................... 2137 1919 E. Pannacci and S. Bartolini Effect of nitrogen fertilization on sorghum for biomass production ..................... 2146 E.N. Shcherbakova, A.V. Shcherbakov, P.Yu. Rots, L.N. Gonchar, S.A. Mulina, L.M. Yahina, Yu.V. Lactionov and V.K. Chebotar Inoculation technology for legumes based on alginate encapsulation ................... 2156 D. Tabti, M. Laouar, K. Rajendran, S. Kumar and A. Abdelguerfi Analysis of gamma rays induced variability in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) ..... 2169 S. Targetti, A. Messeri, G. Argenti and N. Staglianò A comparative analysis of functional traits in semi-natural grasslands under different grazing intensities ................................................................................... 2179 O. Urbanovičová, K. Krištof, P. Findura, M. Mráz, J. Jobbágy and M. Križan The effect of soil conditioner on the spatial variability of soil environment ......... 2197 K. Vehovský, K. Zadinová, R. Stup, J. Čítek, N. Lebedová, M. Okrouhlá and M. Šprysl Fatty acid composition in pork fat: De-novo synthesis, fatty acid sources and influencing factors – a review ............................................................................... 2211 I. Vitázek, R. Majdan and M. Mojžiš Volatile combustible release in biofuels ................................................................ 2229 M. Zargar, G. Bodner, A. Tumanyan, N. Tyutyuma, V. Plushikov, E. Pakina, N. Shcherbakova and M. Bayat Productivity of various barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars under semi-arid conditions in southern Russia ................................................................................ 2242 M. Zargar, P. Polityko, E. Pakina, M. Bayat, V. Vandyshev, N. Kavhiza and E. Kiselev Productivity, quality and economics of four spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars as affected by three cultivation technologies .......................................... 2254 O. Zinina, S. Merenkova, A. Soloveva, T. Savostina, E. Sayfulmulyukov, I. Lykasova and A. Mizhevikina The effect of starter cultures on the qualitative indicators of dry fermented sausages made from poultry meat ......................................................................... 2265 V. Zubko, H. Roubík, O. Zamora and T. Khvorost Analysis and forecast of performance characteristics of combine harvesters ....... 2282 1920 Agronomy Research 16(5), 1921–1930, 2018 https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.18.197
Recommended publications
  • Euphorbia Subg
    ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОЕ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ БЮДЖЕТНОЕ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЕ НАУКИ БОТАНИЧЕСКИЙ ИНСТИТУТ ИМ. В.Л. КОМАРОВА РОССИЙСКОЙ АКАДЕМИИ НАУК На правах рукописи Гельтман Дмитрий Викторович ПОДРОД ESULA РОДА EUPHORBIA (EUPHORBIACEAE): СИСТЕМА, ФИЛОГЕНИЯ, ГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ 03.02.01 — ботаника ДИССЕРТАЦИЯ на соискание ученой степени доктора биологических наук САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГ 2015 2 Оглавление Введение ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Глава 1. Род Euphorbia и основные проблемы его систематики ......................................... 9 1.1. Общая характеристика и систематическое положение .......................................... 9 1.2. Краткая история таксономического изучения и формирования системы рода ... 10 1.3. Основные проблемы систематики рода Euphorbia и его подрода Esula на рубеже XX–XXI вв. и пути их решения ..................................................................................... 15 Глава 2. Материал и методы исследования ........................................................................... 17 Глава 3. Построение системы подрода Esula рода Euphorbia на основе молекулярно- филогенетического подхода ...................................................................................................... 24 3.1. Краткая история молекулярно-филогенетического изучения рода Euphorbia и его подрода Esula ......................................................................................................... 24 3.2. Результаты молекулярно-филогенетического
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Botanica 2-2014.Indd
    Journal of Botany, Vol. VI, Nr. 2(9), Chisinau, 2014 1 ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF MOLDOVA BOTANICAL GARDEN (INSTITUTE) JOURNAL OF BOTANY VOL. VI NR. 2(9) Chisinau, 2014 2 Journal of Botany, Vol. VI, Nr. 2(9), Chisinau, 2014 FOUNDER OF THE “JOURNAL OF BOTANY”: BOTANICAL GARDEN (INSTITUTE) OF THE ASM According to the decision of Supreme Council for Sciences and Technological Development of ASM and National Council for Accreditation and Attestation, nr. 288 of 28.11.2013 on the approval of the assessment and Classifi cation of scientifi c journals, “Journal of Botany” was granted the status of scientifi c publication of “B” Category. EDITORIAL BOARD OF THE „JOURNAL OF BOTANY” Ciubotaru Alexandru, acad., editor-in-chief, Botanical Garden (Institute) of the ASM Teleuţă Alexandru, Ph.D., associate editor, Botanical Garden (Institute) of the ASM Cutcovschi-Muştuc Alina, Ph.D., secretary, Botanical Garden (Institute) of the ASM Members: Duca Gheorghe, acad., President of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova Dediu Ion, corresponding member, Institute of Geography and Ecology of the ASM Şalaru Vasile, corresponding member, Moldova State University Tănase Cătălin, university professor, Botanical Garden „A. Fătu” of the „Al. I. Cuza” University, Iaşi, Romania Cristea Vasile, university professor, Botanical Garden „Alexandru Borza” of the „Babeş- Bolyai” University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Toma Constantin, university professor, „Al. I. Cuza” University, Iaşi, Romania Sârbu Anca, university professor, Botanical Garden „D. Brîndza”, Bucharest, Romania Zaimenko Natalia, professor, dr. hab., M. M. Grishko National Botanical Garden of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Colţun Maricica, Ph. D., Botanical Garden (Institute) of the ASM Comanici Ion, university professor, Botanical Garden (Institute) of the ASM Ştefîrţă Ana, dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Euphorbia Virgata (Leafy Spurge) Predicted Suitable Habitat Modeling
    Euphorbia virgata (Leafy Spurge) Predicted Suitable Habitat Modeling Distribution Status: Present State Rank: SNA Global Rank: GNRTNR Modeling Overview Created by: Braden Burkholder Creation Date: March 26, 2021 Evaluator: Bryce Maxell Evaluation Date: April 14, 2021 Inductive Model Goal: To predict the current distribution and relative suitability of general habitat for Euphorbia virgata at large spatial scales across its presumed current range in Montana. Inductive Model Performance: The model appears to adequately reflect the current distribution and relative suitability of general habitat for Euphorbia virgata at larger spatial scales across its presumed current range in Montana. Evaluation metrics indicate an acceptable model fit and the delineation of habitat suitability classes is well supported by the data. The model is presented as a reference, but more observation records, site-specific data, and/or other environmental layers may be needed to improve performance. Inductive Model Output: http://mtnhp.org/models/files/Euphorbia_virgata_PDEUP0Q0L2_20210326_modelHex.lpk Suggested Citation: Montana Natural Heritage Program. 2021. Euphorbia virgata (Leafy Spurge) predicted suitable habitat model created on March 26, 2021. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 17 pp. Montana Field Guide Species Account: http://fieldguide.mt.gov/speciesDetail.aspx?elcode=PDEUP0Q0L2 Species Model Page: http://mtnhp.org/models/?elcode=PDEUP0Q0L2 page 1 of 17 Euphorbia virgata (Leafy Spurge) Predicted Suitable Habitat Modeling March 26, 2021 Inductive Modeling Model Limitations and Suggested Uses This model is based on statewide biotic and abiotic environmental layers originally mapped at a variety of spatial scales and standardized to 90×90-meter raster pixels. The spatial accuracy of the training and testing data are varied (typically 20-400 meters) and may result in additional statistical noise in the model.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification, Pathogenicity and Comparative Virulence of Fusarium Spp
    Reprinted with author’s permission. (This is a prepublication version from the primary author, which was originally submitted to the journal “Biocontrol Science and Technology.” A revised manuscript was published in “Biocontrol Science and Technology,” June 1998. 8(2):313-319.) Identification, pathogenicity and comparative virulence of Fusarium spp. associated with diseased Euphorbia spp. in Europe ANTHONY J. CAESAR,2 GAETANO CAMPOBASSO,3 and GIANNI TERRAGITTI3 2Pest Management and Agricultural Systems Research Unit, Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, U.S.D.A., Agricultural Research Service, 1500 N Central Avenue, Sidney, MT 59270, U.S.A.; 3 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service European Biological Control Laboratory, Rome Substation, Rome, Italy. Abstract: Fusarium spp. isolated from diseased Euphorbia spp. in Europe were as- sessed for pathogenicity to North American leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula/virgata. Of the nine strains of Fusarium spp. isolated either from diseased E. stepposa or E. virgata in the Caucasus region of Russia and E. esula/virgata in southern France, respectively, all were pathogenic to leafy spurge. There were significant differences in virulence among strains. Four strains, including the two most virulent, were identified as F. ox- ysporum. Four of the five other strains were identified as F. solani and one was identified as F. proliferatum. Three of the four most virulent strains to leafy were isolated from E. stepposa. The most virulent strain was associ- ated with root damage caused by insect biological control agents, similar to a previous study on domestic strains of Fusarium spp. pathogenic to leafy spurge. Two strains identified as F.
    [Show full text]
  • Leafy Spurge in Saskatchewan1
    Reprinted with permission from: Ecological Monographs. Winter 1962. 32:1-29. Published by: University of Saskatchewan. Leafy spurge in Saskatchewan1 G. W. SELLECK, R. T. COUPLAND, and C. FRANKTON Selleck, Monsanto Chemical Company, St. Louis, Missouri. Coupland and Frankton, Plant Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa. Introduction The present interest in the study of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) has been prompted by the steady advance of this weed since its discovery in North America in 1827. The weed was not recognized in western Canada until the early part of the 20th century. Although the rate of spread has not been rapid, the methods of control used have been relatively ineffective, with the result that large areas of land have become infested. This has convinced many agriculturalists that, if unchecked, it will become a major prob- lem in western Canadian agriculture. Difficulty in control has been enhanced by lack of knowledge concerning relation to habitat and the developmental life history of leafy spurge under western Canadian conditions. The need for detailed studies of this persistent weed was realized from the findings of the Sas- katchewan Weed Survey, which was conducted during 1949-1955 concurrently with the early phases of the studies reported here. More than 9,800 acres were found to be infested in 1/3 of the settled portion of the province covered by the sur- vey. The threat from this and other persistent perennial weeds in Sas- katchewan has influenced the provincial government to provide financial assistance to rural mu- nicipalities which use approved Fig. 1. Leafy spurge growing in competition with methods in their control programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist Flora of the Former Carden Township, City of Kawartha Lakes, on 2016
    Hairy Beardtongue (Penstemon hirsutus) Checklist Flora of the Former Carden Township, City of Kawartha Lakes, ON 2016 Compiled by Dale Leadbeater and Anne Barbour © 2016 Leadbeater and Barbour All Rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or database, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, without written permission of the authors. Produced with financial assistance from The Couchiching Conservancy. The City of Kawartha Lakes Flora Project is sponsored by the Kawartha Field Naturalists based in Fenelon Falls, Ontario. In 2008, information about plants in CKL was scattered and scarce. At the urging of Michael Oldham, Biologist at the Natural Heritage Information Centre at the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Dale Leadbeater and Anne Barbour formed a committee with goals to: • Generate a list of species found in CKL and their distribution, vouchered by specimens to be housed at the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, making them available for future study by the scientific community; • Improve understanding of natural heritage systems in the CKL; • Provide insight into changes in the local plant communities as a result of pressures from introduced species, climate change and population growth; and, • Publish the findings of the project . Over eight years, more than 200 volunteers and landowners collected almost 2000 voucher specimens, with the permission of landowners. Over 10,000 observations and literature records have been databased. The project has documented 150 new species of which 60 are introduced, 90 are native and one species that had never been reported in Ontario to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Biological Control of Invasive
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Evolution of Rosids
    *Malpighiales • large and diverse group of 39 families - many of them Diversity and contributing importantly to tropical Evolution of Rosids forest diversity . willows, spurges, and maples . *Salicaceae - willows, poplars *Salicaceae - willows, poplars Chemically defined by salicins (salicylic acid). Many 55 genera, 1000+ species of shrubs/trees - 450 are willows members of the tropical “Flacourtiaceae” with showy flowers (Salix), less numerous are poplars, aspens (Populus). also have salicins and are now part of the Salicaceae Populus deltoides - Salix babylonica - Dovyalis hebecarpa Oncoba spinosa American cottonwood weeping willow 1 *Salicaceae - willows, poplars *Salicaceae - willows, poplars Willows (Salix) are dioecious trees of temperate regions with female male • nectar glands at base of bract allows reduced flowers in aments - both insect and wind pollinated insect as well as wind pollination • fruit is a capsule with cottony seeds for wind dispersal female male Salix babylonica - weeping willow *Salicaceae - willows, poplars *Salicaceae - willows, poplars • species vary from large trees, shrubs, to tiny tundra subshrubs • many species are “precocious” - flower before leaves flush in spring Salix discolor - pussy willow Salix herbacea - Salix pedicellaris - Salix fragilis - dwarf willow bog willow crack willow 2 *Salicaceae - willows, poplars *Salicaceae - willows, poplars Populus - poplars, cottonwood, aspens male • flowers possess a disk • cottony seeds in capsule female Populus deltoides American cottonwood Populus deltoides - American cottonwood *Salicaceae - willows, poplars *Salicaceae - willows, poplars Populus balsamifera Balsam poplar, balm-of-gilead P. tremuloides P. grandidentata trrembling aspen bigtooth aspen • aspens are clonal from root sprouts, fast growing, light Populus alba wooded, and important for White poplar pulp in the paper industry Introduced from Europe 3 *Euphorbiaceae - spurges *Euphorbiaceae - spurges Euphorbiaceae s.l.
    [Show full text]
  • W3185 Target Pest Groups - 2016
    Appendix A W3185 Target Pest Groups - 2016 Arthropod Pests Aphids: (1) Acyrthosiphon pisum, (2) Aphis craccivora, (3) Aphis gossypii, (4) Melanocallis caryaefoliae, (5) Monellia caryella, (6) Monelliopsis pecanis, (7) Myzocallis walshii, (8) Myzus persicae, (9) Pentalonia nigronervosa, (10) Toxoptera citricida, (11) Diuraphis noxia, (12) Unspecified species Beetles: (1) Ceutorhynchus obstrictus, (2) Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, (3) Hypera postica, (4) Lilioceris lilii, (5) Oulema melanopus, (6) Cylas formicarius, (7) Oryctes rhinoceros, (8) Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, (9) Rhynchophorus vulneratus, (10) Rhynchophorus palmarum, (11) Agrilus auroguttatus, (12) Hypothenemus hampei, (13) Leptinotarsa decemlineata, (14) Anoplophora glabripennis,(15) Anaplophora chiniensis, (16) Pyrrhalta viburni, (17) Euwallacea fornicatus species complex, (18) Unspecified species Heteroptera: (1) Anasa tristis, (2) Erythroneura variabilis, (3) Leptoglossus clypealis, (4) Lygus spp., (5) Nezara viridula, (6) Bagrada hilaris, (7) Halyomorpha halys, (8) Pseudacysta perseae, (9) Megacopta cribraria, (10) Unspecified species Lepidoptera: (1) Acropsis muxnoriella, (2) Acrolepiopsis assectella, (3) Adoxophyes orana, (4) Amyelois transitella, (5) Anarsia lineatella, (6) Choristoneura rosaceana, (7) Enarmonia formosana, (8) Heliothis zea, (9) Marmara spp., (10) Pandemis limitata, (11) Pandemis heparana, (12) Pectinophora gossypiella, (13) Phyllocnistis citrella, (14) Plutella xylostella, (15) Spodoptera exigua (16) Epiphyas postvittana, (17) Lobesia botrana, (18)
    [Show full text]
  • Leafy Spurge Distribution
    A Guide to Weeds in British Columbia LEAFY SPURGE DISTRIBUTION Euphorbia esula L. Family: Euphorbiaceae (Spurge). Other Scientific Names: Euphorbia virgata. Other Common Names: None. Legal Status: Provincial Noxious. Growth form: Perennial forb. Roots: Extensive lateral root system. Flower: Flowers are yellowish green, small, Seedling: Seed leaves (cotyledons) are arranged in numerous small clusters with linear to lanceolate, with entire margins. distinctive paired Other: The entire plant contains bracts underneath. white, milky latex. Foliage of the Bracts are heart plant is smooth and hairless. shaped and yellow- green. Similar Species Seeds/Fruit: Seeds are Exotics: Six species of spurge oblong, greyish to purple, occur in BC, all introduced contained in a 3-celled (Douglas et al. 1999). capsule. Natives: None. Leaves: Leaves are alternate, narrow, 2–6 cm long. Stems: Mature plants are 20–90 cm tall. Stems are thickly clustered. Impacts ____________________________________________ Agricultural: Invades rangeland and reduces its plant produces an allelopathic compound that inhibits productivity for livestock and wildlife (Lajeunesse et the growth of other plants (Butterfield et al. 1996). al. 1999). Human: The milky latex can cause irritation, Ecological: Leafy spurge is a long-lived perennial that blotching, blisters, and swelling. Wear gloves while reproduces by seeds and buds on persistent, creeping pulling or contacting this plant. Never rub the eyes or roots (Powell et al. 1994). All parts of the plant contain face until after the hands are thoroughly washed. a milky latex that is poisonous to some livestock. The Habitat and Ecology __________________________________ General requirements: In BC, grows at low- to mid- Distribution: Isolated pockets occur in the Thompson, elevations on dry roadsides, fields, grasslands, open Cariboo, Boundary, East Kootenay, Nechako, and forests, and disturbed habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Non-Native Plant Early Detection and Rapid Response (EDRR) Targets in Western San Diego County
    Invasive non-native plant Early Detection and Rapid Response (EDRR) targets in western San Diego County Report new sightings of these plants to coordinator Jason Giessow, [email protected] or iNaturalist.org or Calflora.org Version 2019-6-3 Populations ID Scientific name Common name Growth form CDFA Habitat Status (eradicated) Sheet Aegilops triuncialis Barbed goat grass Annual grass B Grassland Active EDRR target 1 (1) Yes Ageratina adenophora Eupatory Perennial forb Q Riparian Active EDRR target 4 Yes Carrichtera annua Ward's weed Annual forb A Uplands (shrub & grass) Active EDRR target 5 Yes Centaurea solstitialis Yellow star thistle Annual forb C Grassland Active EDRR target 11 (11) Yes Centaurea stoebe Spotted knapweed Annual forb A Uplands Active EDRR target 3 (3) Yes Cytisus scoparius Scotch broom Perennial shrub C Uplands (shrub & grass) Eradicated: monitoring (1) Elymus caput-medusae Medusahead Annual grass C Grassland Active EDRR target 7 Yes Perennial sub- Enchylaena tomentosa Ruby saltbush A Uplands (shrub & grass) Assessing 1 (1) Yes shrub Euphorbia terracina Carnation spurge Annual forb B Uplands Eradicated: monitoring 8 (1) Yes Yes Euphorbia virgata Leafy spurge Annual forb A Uplands Active EDRR target 1 (1) (See ET) Genista monosperma Bridal broom Perennial shrub B Uplands (shrub & grass) Active EDRR target 4 Yes Genista monspessulana French broom Perennial shrub C Riparian or uplands Active EDRR target 5 Yes Canary Island St. Hypericum canariense Perennial shrub B Shrublands Active EDRR target 12 Yes John's wort Perennial
    [Show full text]
  • Meadow Creek
    Meadow Creek Located in the Pinos Altos Range, Gila National Forest. Elevation 7200’. Habitats: Riparian; east facing mesic slopes; xeric western slopes; rock outcroppings. Directions: from Silver City take NM Hwy 15 north for 6 miles to Pinos Altos, continue N on NM Hwy 15 for 8.3 miles. The Meadow Creek turnoff (FS Rd 149) is to the right and then 3 miles on the dirt road to a suitable parking area. Travel time, one way from Silver City, approx. 40 minutes. * = Introduced BRYOPHYTES (Mosses, Liverworts and Hornworts) PLEUROCARPOUS MOSSES BARTRAMIACEAE Anacolia menziesii BRACHYTHECIACEAE Brachythecium salebrosum HYPNACEAE Platygyrium fuscoluteum LESKEACEAE Pseudoleskeella tectorum ACROCARPOUS MOSSES BRYACEAE Bryum lanatum – Silvery Bryum DICRANACEAE Dicranum rhabdocarpum DITRICHACEAE Ceratodon purpureus FUNARIACEAE Funaria hygrometrica var. hygrometrica MNIACEAE Plagiomnium cuspidatum 1 POTTIACEAE Syntrichia ruralis MONILOPHYTES (Ferns and Horsetails) DENNSTAEDTIACEAE – Bracken Fern Family Pteridium aquilinum – bracken fern EQUISETACEAE – Horsetail Family Equisetum laevigatum – horsetail or scouring rush ACROGYMNOSPERMS (formerly Gymnosperms) (Pine, Fir, Spruce, Juniper, Ephedra) CUPRESSACEAE – Juniper Family Juniperus deppeana – alligator juniper Juniperus scopulorum – Rocky Mountain juniper PINACEAE – Pine Family Pinus arizonica – Arizona pine Pinus edulis – piñon pine Pinus ponderosa – ponderosa pine Pinus reflexa – southwestern white pine Pseudotsuga menziesii – Douglas fir MONOCOTS AGAVACEAE Yucca baccata – banana yucca Echeandia flavescens Torrey’s crag-lily ALLIACEAE – Onion Family Allium sp. – wild onion COMMELINACEAE – Spiderwort Family Commelina dianthifolia – dayflower Tradescantia pinetorum – spiderwort CYPERACEAE – Sedge Family Carex geophila – mountain sedge IRIDACEAE – Iris Family Iris missouriensis – western blue flag, Rocky Mountain iris 2 JUNCACEAE – Rush Family Juncus sp. – nut rush ORCHIDACEAE – Orchid Family Corallorhiza wisteriana – spring coralroot orchid Malaxis soulei – Chihuahua adder’s mouth Platanthera sp.
    [Show full text]