Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 86/Friday, May 3, 2002/Notices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 86/Friday, May 3, 2002/Notices 29276 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2002 / Notices TO APPENDIX TO MEMORANDUM OF ‘‘We’ve been trying to get into the Microsoft’s ?? advantage—that it devel??ps AMICI CURIAE IN OPPOSITION TO networking capability of Microsoft’s products both the basic operating-system ??oftware PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT IN CIVIL and find there’s one con, non theme: that makes personal com??ters run, known as ACTION NO. 94–1564 NETBIOS,’’ Caro said. Microsoft does not yet MS-DOS. and ??pphactons software, like SIGNED BY GARY REBACK support native TCP/IP, but uses NETBIOS or word-pro??essing programs or spreadsheets, 2ND STORY of Level I printed in FULL NETBEUI encapsulated within TCP/IP, he ??nat perform spec?? ?? format. Copyright 1994 Network World, Inc. said. ‘‘Microsoft s whole empire is based in the Network World July 25, 1994 94–1564 ‘‘we’re totally uninterested in any interlocking nature of their ??perating-system FILED FEB 14 1995 approach like this; it can’t handle a network and application oftware.’’ said William Joy, SECTION: TOP NEWS; Pg. 4 of more than 50 users and is terrible over the a ??ounder of Sun Microsystems, and the LENGTH: 724 words wide area,’’ Caro said. ??uthor of one version of the Unix Perating HEADLINE: Microsoft free at last?; And Windows NT has proved unable to system. Ruling still lets firm incorporate apps in its handle the applications that Otis wants to ??Vol a Central Issue Microsoft officials OSes. take off its mainframe system, because said Saturday ??nal issues related to the Clerk, U.S. District Court Windows NT is not a multiuser environment. relationship ?? their operating software and District of Columbia But Caro respects Microsoft’s ability to their ??ppicaons programs had not been BYLINE: Michael Csenger and adam Gaffin change course as necessary and awaits the ??ocus of their ?? nego??anons with us??ce BODY: promised native TCP/IP support in Chicago. Department officials. Washington, DC ‘‘That one feature alone is going to cause MS-DOS and the Windows proram, which The antitrust settlement Microsoft Corp. dramatic change in network connectivity,’’ makes DOS easier to ?? are installed in reached with the Justice Department skirted said Nick Lippis, principal at Strategic millions of com. ?? worldwide White the an issue central to network users, paving the Networks Consulting, Inc. in Rockland, Jusuce ??epartiment has decided that Micro?? way for the software giant to continue Mass., referring to Windows’’ TCP/IP. does have a monopoly in opera?? ?? systems, integrating applications with its desktop and Native TCP/IP support for Chicago could it ?? that the ?? changes the c??unsent decree network operating systems. help Microsoft cut into Novell’s installed spells ??ut provide a remedy. The consent decree, announced July 16, NetWare client base by providing an Yet many Microsoft compet??nors ??ce a focused almost entirely on the way Microsoft alternative to Novell’s Internetwork Packet broader problem, as well: the ??ne between sold operating systems to hardware vendors. Exchange (IPX) protocol. If the desktop where the operating system ends and the But it does not prevent the company from operating systems supported TCP/IP directly, applications pro??las start is increasingly integrating applications into the operating ‘‘why continue with IPX?’’ Lippis asked. being ??lurred by advances in technology. system itself. NOVELL NOT WORRIED ??Smaller compe??tors with innovave ideas ‘‘I laugh when I hear people say it’s all over Competing software vendors such as Lotus in businesses as diverse as ?? man. ?? for Novell now, we should pack up and go Development Corp. had long alleged that compression, home,’’ said David Bradford, vice president Microsoft’s applications division received ?? creates more storage space on disk, and and general counsel for Novell. unfair information from its operating systems screen savers, which pre?? ent damage to ‘‘Microsoft has come against Novell division that gave the company a leg up on mounors, are finding ?? their business is [several] now with their networking the competition. products, and we’ve beat them every time,’’ evaporating because Microsoft keeps adding Some analysts and users said the decree, Bradford said. such programs to ?? operating system as ?? which also poses stricter controls on the Bradford also noted that this consent periodically brings out an updated version. royalties Microsoft can collect from personal decree does not close Microsoft’s books A Microsoft’s operating system scheduled computer vendors, leaves the path clear for forever. ‘‘They will be monitored, perhaps for release next year, called Chicago, will Microsoft to mop up competitors that sell even more so than before,’’ he said. ‘‘The acceler?? the process The program will stand-alone applications, resulting in more industry and consumers have an ally in the mer??e DOS and Windows and will include limited user choice down the road. Justice Department.’’ electronic mail, remote access, filesearching SKEPTICISM Frank Dzubeck, president of functions and screen savers. Since But others said Microsoft has yet to prove Communications Network Architects, Inc., in introducing MS-DOS in 1981. to the market that it has operating systems Washington, DC, agrees that the case may not Microsoft has continually campaigned to and networked applications worth betting a yet be closed. expand the ?? of what computing functions business on. ‘‘A lot of its networking ‘‘If Microsoft gets very aggressive and starts belong inside the computer operating system. products are either futures or first-generation burying things in their operating systems, The early vers?? of DOS were small products,’’ said Jamie Lewis, president of The then this whole issue will be revisited, he programs that did ?? more than control the Burton Group, a Salt Lake City consulting said. But it will require that another company storage and ?? of data and start and stop firm. The company faces entrenched and first go bankrupt.’’ applications programs. But in the 14 years growing user bases for both Novell, Inc.’s LANGUAGE: ENGLISH that followed, Microsoft’s ??rating systems NetWare operating systems and Lotus’’ Notes LOAD-DATE-MDC: July 27, 1994 have greatly expanded the servtees they groupware applications, he said. Users also TO APPENDIX TO MEMORANDUM OF provide to users and programmers The other expressed skepticism. AMICI CURIAE IN OPPOSITION TO important issue not specifically addressed in ‘‘Microsoft promises Chicago and Cairo PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT IN CIVIL the consent decree is whether Microsoft has and a whole lot of networking, but the ACTION NO. 94–1564 been able to leverage us virtual monopoly ?? question is, will it work before they run out SIGNED BY GARY REBACK operating systems into domination of of cities to name these things after?’’ quipped Business Day applications software—a far bigger and more a network manager whose major brokerage M?? lucrative market This matter is of great house network runs on Unix. The New Work Times concern to companies like Lotus windows NT is not a truly open Microsoft’s Barely Limited Future Development. environment, he said, ‘‘Because if Gates By JOHN MARKOFF Boarland International and Novell, and its doesn’t have it then neither do you, and I’d ?? recently acquired Wordperfect—which rather not put myself in his hands. That’s SAN FRANCISCO, June 17—Rath?? than specialize in applications software. About why we’ve standardized on Unix for our reining in the Microsoft Corporation, the half of the 50 million computers that run trading floor.’’ consent deeree that the Justice Department Windows, for example use Microsoft’s word Frank Caro, technology transition team announced over the weekend with Microsoft. processor, called Word, and its spreadsheet, leader for Otis Elevator Co. in Farmington, the world’s largest software publisher, frees Excel. Conn., cited interoperability problems with the company to define the computer It was for that reason that lawyers at the Microsoft’s current Windows implementation mudstry’s ground ?? through the rest of the Federal Trade commission toyed two years of Transmission Control Protocol/Internet decade. ago with the idea of breaking Microsoft into Protocol as an example of the company’s The agreement leaves ??intouched what two companies, More recently, Justice network shortcomings. many computer in??justry executives say is Department investigators are believed to have VerDate 11<MAY>2000 01:17 Apr 29, 2002 Jkt 189961 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\OC\A76AD3.078 pfrm11 PsN: ADBOOK11 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2002 / Notices 29277 studied ways of creating some sort of operating-system features and providing system might be. This will, of course, lead to ‘‘Chinese wall’’ that might limit the earlier access to technical information for its code that is optimized for Windows. (Okay. information traveling between the two sides programmers. Microsoft is a bit confused here. This is of the business. Anne K. Bingaman, Assistant Microsoft officials said the Government because part of the company wants to protect Attorney General in charge of annt??rust had found no evidence that such a special the rights of its Word and Excel teams by matters, refused to comment on the issue. But advantage existed. ‘‘We don’t think this is insisting on special terms for using the cross- in response to a question whether, the market power in the traditional an??trust platform code for people who write word department had considered trying to split sense.’’ Said William h. Neukom, the processors or spreadsheets.) Microsoft, she said Sa??day that her lawyers, company’s vice president for law and TIE RIGHT NETWORK bad looked at ‘‘every possible legal th?? ory corporate affairs. ‘‘Anyone can come in and The dominance in tools, applications, and ?? Linkage Is Seft-Pedaled?? upset you with better technology. We think operating systems may be just the beginning.
Recommended publications
  • Twenty Years of Berkeley Unix : from AT&T-Owned to Freely
    Twenty Years of Berkeley Unix : From AT&T-Owned to Freely Redistributable Marshall Kirk McKusick Early History Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie presented the first Unix paper at the Symposium on Operating Systems Principles at Purdue University in November 1973. Professor Bob Fabry, of the University of California at Berkeley, was in attendance and immediately became interested in obtaining a copy of the system to experiment with at Berkeley. At the time, Berkeley had only large mainframe computer systems doing batch processing, so the first order of business was to get a PDP-11/45 suitable for running with the then-current Version 4 of Unix. The Computer Science Department at Berkeley, together with the Mathematics Department and the Statistics Department, were able to jointly purchase a PDP-11/45. In January 1974, a Version 4 tape was delivered and Unix was installed by graduate student Keith Standiford. Although Ken Thompson at Purdue was not involved in the installation at Berkeley as he had been for most systems up to that time, his expertise was soon needed to determine the cause of several strange system crashes. Because Berkeley had only a 300-baud acoustic-coupled modem without auto answer capability, Thompson would call Standiford in the machine room and have him insert the phone into the modem; in this way Thompson was able to remotely debug crash dumps from New Jersey. Many of the crashes were caused by the disk controller's inability to reliably do overlapped seeks, contrary to the documentation. Berkeley's 11/45 was among the first systems that Thompson had encountered that had two disks on the same controller! Thompson's remote debugging was the first example of the cooperation that sprang up between Berkeley and Bell Labs.
    [Show full text]
  • NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS Form N-PX
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM N-PX Annual report of proxy voting record of registered management investment companies filed on Form N-PX Filing Date: 2017-08-24 | Period of Report: 2017-06-30 SEC Accession No. 0000898432-17-000842 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS Mailing Address Business Address 1290 AVENUE OF THE 1290 AVENUE OF THE CIK:1317474| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1031 AMERICAS AMERICAS Type: N-PX | Act: 40 | File No.: 811-21715 | Film No.: 171048680 NEW YORK NY 10104 NEW YORK NY 10104 (212) 476-8800 Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 24, 2017 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM N-PX Annual Report of Proxy Voting Record of Registered Management Investment Company Investment Company Act file number: 811-21715 NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS (Exact Name of the Registrant as Specified in Charter) c/o Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104-0002 (Address of Principal Executive Offices – Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 476-8800 Robert Conti Chief Executive Officer and President Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds c/o Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104-0002 Arthur C. Delibert, Esq. K&L Gates LLP 1601 K Street, N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the FOURTH CIRCUIT
    Case: 10-1482 Document: 35 Date Filed: 09/17/2010 Page: 1 No. 10-1482 IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT dNOVELL, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, —v.— MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BRIEF OF APPELLEE MICROSOFT CORPORATION RICHARD J. WALLIS DAVID B.TULCHIN STEVEN J. AESCHBACHER Counsel of Record MICROSOFT CORPORATION STEVEN L. HOLLEY One Microsoft Way SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP Redmond, Washington 98052 125 Broad Street (425) 882-8080 New York, New York 10004 (212) 558-4000 G. S TEWART WEBB VENABLE LLP 750 East Pratt Street, Suite 900 Baltimore, Maryland 21202 (410) 244-7400 Attorneys for Microsoft Corporation September 17, 2010 Case: 10-1482 Document: 35 Date Filed: 09/17/2010 Page: 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS AND OTHER INTERESTS Only one form needs to be completed for a party even if the party is represented by more than one attorney. Disclosures must be filed on behalf of all parties to a civil, agency, bankruptcy or mandamus case. Corporate defendants in a criminal or post-conviction case and corporate amici curiae are required to file disclosure statements. Counsel has a continuing duty to update this information. No. _______ Caption: __________________________________________________ Pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and Local Rule 26.1, ______________________ who is _______________________, makes the following disclosure: (name of party/amicus) (appellant/appellee/amicus) 1. Is party/amicus a publicly held corporation or other publicly held entity? YES NO 2. Does party/amicus have any parent corporations? YES NO If yes, identify all parent corporations, including grandparent and great-grandparent corporations: 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Motivations of Participating in Open Source Projects
    Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2001 Working for Free? – Motivations of Participating in Open Source Projects Alexander Hars Shaosong Ou IOM Department IOM Department Marshall School of Business Marshall School of Business University of Southern California University of Southern California [email protected] [email protected] Abstract the public, including the right to use, to redistribute and to The success of the Linux operating system has modify the software free of charge. This is a direct demonstrated the viability of an alternative form of challenge to the established assumptions about software software development – open source software – that markets that threatens the position of commercial challenges traditional assumptions about software software vendors. markets. Understanding what drives open source The open source phenomenon raises many interesting developers to participate in open source projects is questions. Its proponents regard it as a paradigmatic crucial for assessing the impact of open source software. change where the economics of private goods built on the This article identifies two broad types of motivations that scarcity of resources are replaced by the economics of account for their participation in open source projects. public goods where scarcity is not an issue. Critics argue The first category includes internal factors such as that open source software will always be relegated to intrinsic motivation and altruism, and the second niche areas, that it cannot compete with their commercial category focuses on external rewards such as expected opponents in terms of product stability and reliability future returns and personal needs. This article also [15], and that open source projects lack the capability to reports the results of a survey administered to open innovate.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIX History Page 1 Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:02 PM
    UNIX History Page 1 Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:02 PM CHAPTER 1 UNIX Evolution and Standardization This chapter introduces UNIX from a historical perspective, showing how the various UNIX versions have evolved over the years since the very first implementation in 1969 to the present day. The chapter also traces the history of the different attempts at standardization that have produced widely adopted standards such as POSIX and the Single UNIX Specification. The material presented here is not intended to document all of the UNIX variants, but rather describes the early UNIX implementations along with those companies and bodies that have had a major impact on the direction and evolution of UNIX. A Brief Walk through Time There are numerous events in the computer industry that have occurred since UNIX started life as a small project in Bell Labs in 1969. UNIX history has been largely influenced by Bell Labs’ Research Editions of UNIX, AT&T’s System V UNIX, Berkeley’s Software Distribution (BSD), and Sun Microsystems’ SunOS and Solaris operating systems. The following list shows the major events that have happened throughout the history of UNIX. Later sections describe some of these events in more detail. 1 UNIX History Page 2 Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:02 PM 2 UNIX Filesystems—Evolution, Design, and Implementation 1969. Development on UNIX starts in AT&T’s Bell Labs. 1971. 1st Edition UNIX is released. 1973. 4th Edition UNIX is released. This is the first version of UNIX that had the kernel written in C. 1974. Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie publish their classic paper, “The UNIX Timesharing System” [RITC74].
    [Show full text]
  • The Trademark History of Linux, the Operating System by Tonya Gisselberg Copyright ©2010 by Tonya Gisselberg
    The Trademark History of Linux, the Operating System by Tonya Gisselberg Copyright ©2010 by Tonya Gisselberg I. Introduction Despite its name, this article is about more than the trademark history of Linux. It begins at the prehistory of Linux and incorporates other areas of intellectual property on the theory that looking at the subject from its all-inclusive intellectual property context adds depth and understanding to the trademark discussion. A good portion of this article is devoted to telling the Linux story - a fascinating and inspirational story. Telling the Linux story is also a necessary component of describing the history of Linux trademarks. A trademark is used by the trademark owner “to identify and distinguish his or her goods, including a unique product, from those manufactured or sold by others and to indicate the source of the goods, even if that source is unknown.”1 A trademark can identify a particular technology, such as Dolby® Surround technology. 2 Under the statutory definition, a trademark cannot have an existence independent from a good or service. “There is no such thing as property in a trade- mark except as a right appurtenant to an established business or trade in connection with which the mark is employed.”3 If there is no identifiable good or protectable technology, but instead, a public domain good or technology that anyone can freely copy and use, then there is nothing to trademark. This is particularly true when the product is something as functional and commoditized as software. Ubuntu 4 Linux and Red Hat 5 Linux are valid trademarks apart from the software because the companies that own those trademarks also sell services.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Stupidity: Over 20 Years of High-Tech Marketing Disasters
    CYAN YELLOW MAGENTA BLACK PANTONE 123 CV Chapman “A funny AND grim read that explains why so many of the high-tech sales departments I’ve trained and written about over the years frequently have Merrill R.Chapman homicidal impulses towards their marketing groups. A must read.” Foreword by Eric Sink —Mike Bosworth Author of Solution Selling, Creating Buyers in Difficult Selling Markets and coauthor of Customer Centric Selling In Search of Stupidity In Search OVER 20 YEARS OF HIGH-TECH MARKETING DISASTERS 20 YEARS OF HIGH-TECH OVER n 1982 Tom Peters and Robert Waterman Ikicked off the modern business book era with In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies. Unfortunately, as time went by it became painfully obvious that many of the companies Peters and Waterman had profiled, particularly the high-tech ones, were something less than excellent. Firms such as Atari, DEC, IBM, Lanier, Wang, Xerox and others either crashed and burned or underwent painful and wrenching traumas you would have expected excellent companies to avoid. What went wrong? Merrill R. (Rick) Chapman believes he has the answer (and the proof is in these pages). He’s observed that high-tech companies periodically meltdown because they fail to learn from the lessons of the past and thus continue to make the same completely avoidable mistakes again and again and again. To help teach you this, In Search of Stupidity takes you on a fascinating journey from yesterday to today as it salvages some of high-tech’s most famous car wrecks. You will be there as MicroPro, once the industry’s largest desktop software company, destroys itself by committing a fundamental positioning mistake.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Corporation
    A Progressive Digital Media business COMPANY PROFILE Microsoft Corporation REFERENCE CODE: 8ABE78BB-0732-4ACA-A41D-3012EBB1334D PUBLICATION DATE: 25 Jul 2017 www.marketline.com COPYRIGHT MARKETLINE. THIS CONTENT IS A LICENSED PRODUCT AND IS NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED OR DISTRIBUTED Microsoft Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Company Overview ........................................................................................................3 Key Facts.........................................................................................................................3 Business Description .....................................................................................................4 History .............................................................................................................................5 Key Employees .............................................................................................................26 Key Employee Biographies .........................................................................................28 Major Products & Services ..........................................................................................35 SWOT Analysis .............................................................................................................36 Top Competitors ...........................................................................................................44 Company View ..............................................................................................................45
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Novell
    **FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE** EDITORS: For review copies or interview requests, contact: Roger Bourke White Jr. Tel: 801-883-9731 Email: [email protected] (When requesting a review copy, please provide a street address.) The Story of Novell: A Leading Software and Services Corporation Discover what it’s like to be on the brink of multi-million dollar success SALT LAKE CITY – As PC-based technology becomes increasingly vital to everyday life, many wonder how it all began. Roger Bourke White Jr. was there in 1981, on the ground floor of Novell Inc., a crucial information technology (IT) company in the 1990s and 2000s. Surfing the High Tech Wave: A History of Novell 1980 - 1990 (published by AuthorHouse) tells Novell’s story of rising from near bankruptcy in 1982 to controlling 70% of the marketplace in 1990. Novell started with the ambition to be a computer, terminal and printer maker, but that dream failed. While the walls were crashing down around them, four computer programmers were working diligently on a second dream, the Local Area Network (LAN) product. What became known as Netware, the LAN would succeed mightily and give Novell a prominent name in the software marketplace. The computer networking market would have developed in a very different way without the hard work and dedication of these four men, the ten other survivors of the first dream and legendary IT entrepreneur Ray Noorda. Follow Novell on a rollercoaster ride of aspiration and growth, then experimentation and failure and finally rebirth and blinding success. The original Novell founders risked it all and failed.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation, Search
    Microsoft From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Coordinates: 47°38′22.55″N 122°7′42.42″W / 47.6395972°N 122.12845°W / 47.6395972; -122.12845 Microsoft Corporation Public (NASDAQ: MSFT) Dow Jones Industrial Average Type Component S&P 500 Component Computer software Consumer electronics Digital distribution Computer hardware Industry Video games IT consulting Online advertising Retail stores Automotive software Albuquerque, New Mexico Founded April 4, 1975 Bill Gates Founder(s) Paul Allen One Microsoft Way Headquarters Redmond, Washington, United States Area served Worldwide Key people Steve Ballmer (CEO) Brian Kevin Turner (COO) Bill Gates (Chairman) Ray Ozzie (CSA) Craig Mundie (CRSO) Products See products listing Services See services listing Revenue $62.484 billion (2010) Operating income $24.098 billion (2010) Profit $18.760 billion (2010) Total assets $86.113 billion (2010) Total equity $46.175 billion (2010) Employees 89,000 (2010) Subsidiaries List of acquisitions Website microsoft.com Microsoft Corporation is an American public multinational corporation headquartered in Redmond, Washington, USA that develops, manufactures, licenses, and supports a wide range of products and services predominantly related to computing through its various product divisions. Established on April 4, 1975 to develop and sell BASIC interpreters for the Altair 8800, Microsoft rose to dominate the home computer operating system (OS) market with MS-DOS in the mid-1980s, followed by the Microsoft Windows line of OSes. Microsoft would also come to dominate the office suite market with Microsoft Office. The company has diversified in recent years into the video game industry with the Xbox and its successor, the Xbox 360 as well as into the consumer electronics market with Zune and the Windows Phone OS.
    [Show full text]
  • At Home with Your Computer
    DEC 1995 Britain's favourite Personal Computer magazine MORTAL KOMBAT MANIA PAGE 98 Consumer PC/TVs Mortal Kombat mania ● December 1995 £2.95 Pentium Pro Arrives: Viglen’s P6 Powerhouse Overseas Price £3.95 France 110 FF Germany DM 20,00 WIN a Pentium ● Italy 18,000 Lire Spain 1,225 PTS Malta Lm 2.85c Holland HFL 17,95 Belgium 364.00 BFr Notebook p.266 Group Tests : Anti-virus packages, Storage and backup media Finland FIM 49.50 Canada CAN$12.95 VNU Business Publications At home with your PC/TVsPC/TVs computer ● Office hybrids: printer/fax/scanner Pentium Pro arrives First glimpse of ● HP Omnibook 600CT Viglen’s P6 Office hybrids Printer/ ● fax/ RAM Doublers scanner RAM Doublers Memory for less? IF YOUR CD-ROM OR 3.5" DISK ARE MISSING Anti-Virus packages ASK YOUR NEWSAGENT Seven of the best tested ALL HARDWARE TESTED BY THE VNU LABS VOL18 NO12 Group Test All sorts of storage stuff December 1995 PCW December 1995 Contents Regulars Hands On 110 Group Tests First Impressions 55 18 Newsprint PCTVs Storage and Backup 56 Gadgets Macro virus sweeps the world. Intel 134 launches the (P6) Pentium Pro. First 60 HP Omnibook 600 CT Cited as the next big growth Hardware look at “Pentium class” chip for hand- ● Often a secondary concern, storage and The latest model in Hewlett-Packard’s helds. Eight-speed CD drives. New area for PCs, the home Omnibook range will give your desktop print system sprouts cheap lasers. backup devices play an important part in com- a run for its money.
    [Show full text]
  • KCG 2013 HARDWARE/IT MAP Report - SERVERS
    KCG 2013 HARDWARE/IT MAP Report - SERVERS Program Effectiveness Metrics Shortlisting DUMMY DATA Analysts vendor months 2=REACTIVE Responsiveness Efficacyof Comms OverallEffectiveness Access Executives to Interactions perQuarter that would shortlist vendor that would net yearnet on increase or Proactivity (1=PROACTIVE- last 3 months in THIS segment last 3months in Likely or Very Likely to shortlist Likely or Very shortlisted THIS vendor in last3 shortlisted % of analysts that are % of responding they shortlisted THIS vendor in the they shortlisted Total number of analysts Indicating number of analystsIndicating Total (decrease)in percentage ofanalysts %of analyststhat shortlist that have Quality and Availability of References Availability Quality and threshold of analyst responses (20%) Vendors receivingless than Vendors SERVERS SEGMENT AVERAGE 3.25 6.69 6.13 5.80 7.08 6.69 1.51 10.82 33% 48% 14% 2013 HARDWARE/IT SAPA AVERAGE 3.17 6.64 6.09 5.82 7.06 6.67 1.49 10.15 32% 48% 13% ANALYSTS PARTICIPATING ATTO Analysts Participating 14 BlueArc Vendor Count IPQ AE REF EFF RESP OE PRO 3 MOS %3 MOS LTS YOY Analyst Firm Canon 22 Acer 14 3.07 6.14 5.00 4.69 7.43 6.93 1.31 5 30% 31% 0% 1 Tim Bajarin Creative Strategies, Inc Panasas AMD 12 3.08 7.00 6.08 5.83 7.17 6.83 1.42 3 26% 50% 0% 2 Tony Prigmore Enterprise Strategy Group Pillar Apple 15 3.00 7.00 6.07 7.06 7.13 7.71 1.93 10 33% 61% 0% 3 Andrew Butler Gartner PMC/Adaptec ARM 31 4.52 7.00 6.06 5.18 7.26 6.86 1.59 20 40% 55% 37% 4 Donna Scott Gartner Scale Computing Cisco 36 4.25 6.08 5.69 5.95
    [Show full text]