Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 86/Friday, May 3, 2002/Notices
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Twenty Years of Berkeley Unix : from AT&T-Owned to Freely
Twenty Years of Berkeley Unix : From AT&T-Owned to Freely Redistributable Marshall Kirk McKusick Early History Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie presented the first Unix paper at the Symposium on Operating Systems Principles at Purdue University in November 1973. Professor Bob Fabry, of the University of California at Berkeley, was in attendance and immediately became interested in obtaining a copy of the system to experiment with at Berkeley. At the time, Berkeley had only large mainframe computer systems doing batch processing, so the first order of business was to get a PDP-11/45 suitable for running with the then-current Version 4 of Unix. The Computer Science Department at Berkeley, together with the Mathematics Department and the Statistics Department, were able to jointly purchase a PDP-11/45. In January 1974, a Version 4 tape was delivered and Unix was installed by graduate student Keith Standiford. Although Ken Thompson at Purdue was not involved in the installation at Berkeley as he had been for most systems up to that time, his expertise was soon needed to determine the cause of several strange system crashes. Because Berkeley had only a 300-baud acoustic-coupled modem without auto answer capability, Thompson would call Standiford in the machine room and have him insert the phone into the modem; in this way Thompson was able to remotely debug crash dumps from New Jersey. Many of the crashes were caused by the disk controller's inability to reliably do overlapped seeks, contrary to the documentation. Berkeley's 11/45 was among the first systems that Thompson had encountered that had two disks on the same controller! Thompson's remote debugging was the first example of the cooperation that sprang up between Berkeley and Bell Labs. -
NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS Form N-PX
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM N-PX Annual report of proxy voting record of registered management investment companies filed on Form N-PX Filing Date: 2017-08-24 | Period of Report: 2017-06-30 SEC Accession No. 0000898432-17-000842 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS Mailing Address Business Address 1290 AVENUE OF THE 1290 AVENUE OF THE CIK:1317474| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1031 AMERICAS AMERICAS Type: N-PX | Act: 40 | File No.: 811-21715 | Film No.: 171048680 NEW YORK NY 10104 NEW YORK NY 10104 (212) 476-8800 Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 24, 2017 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM N-PX Annual Report of Proxy Voting Record of Registered Management Investment Company Investment Company Act file number: 811-21715 NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS (Exact Name of the Registrant as Specified in Charter) c/o Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104-0002 (Address of Principal Executive Offices – Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 476-8800 Robert Conti Chief Executive Officer and President Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds c/o Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104-0002 Arthur C. Delibert, Esq. K&L Gates LLP 1601 K Street, N.W. -
United States Court of Appeals for the FOURTH CIRCUIT
Case: 10-1482 Document: 35 Date Filed: 09/17/2010 Page: 1 No. 10-1482 IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT dNOVELL, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, —v.— MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BRIEF OF APPELLEE MICROSOFT CORPORATION RICHARD J. WALLIS DAVID B.TULCHIN STEVEN J. AESCHBACHER Counsel of Record MICROSOFT CORPORATION STEVEN L. HOLLEY One Microsoft Way SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP Redmond, Washington 98052 125 Broad Street (425) 882-8080 New York, New York 10004 (212) 558-4000 G. S TEWART WEBB VENABLE LLP 750 East Pratt Street, Suite 900 Baltimore, Maryland 21202 (410) 244-7400 Attorneys for Microsoft Corporation September 17, 2010 Case: 10-1482 Document: 35 Date Filed: 09/17/2010 Page: 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS AND OTHER INTERESTS Only one form needs to be completed for a party even if the party is represented by more than one attorney. Disclosures must be filed on behalf of all parties to a civil, agency, bankruptcy or mandamus case. Corporate defendants in a criminal or post-conviction case and corporate amici curiae are required to file disclosure statements. Counsel has a continuing duty to update this information. No. _______ Caption: __________________________________________________ Pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and Local Rule 26.1, ______________________ who is _______________________, makes the following disclosure: (name of party/amicus) (appellant/appellee/amicus) 1. Is party/amicus a publicly held corporation or other publicly held entity? YES NO 2. Does party/amicus have any parent corporations? YES NO If yes, identify all parent corporations, including grandparent and great-grandparent corporations: 3. -
Motivations of Participating in Open Source Projects
Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2001 Working for Free? – Motivations of Participating in Open Source Projects Alexander Hars Shaosong Ou IOM Department IOM Department Marshall School of Business Marshall School of Business University of Southern California University of Southern California [email protected] [email protected] Abstract the public, including the right to use, to redistribute and to The success of the Linux operating system has modify the software free of charge. This is a direct demonstrated the viability of an alternative form of challenge to the established assumptions about software software development – open source software – that markets that threatens the position of commercial challenges traditional assumptions about software software vendors. markets. Understanding what drives open source The open source phenomenon raises many interesting developers to participate in open source projects is questions. Its proponents regard it as a paradigmatic crucial for assessing the impact of open source software. change where the economics of private goods built on the This article identifies two broad types of motivations that scarcity of resources are replaced by the economics of account for their participation in open source projects. public goods where scarcity is not an issue. Critics argue The first category includes internal factors such as that open source software will always be relegated to intrinsic motivation and altruism, and the second niche areas, that it cannot compete with their commercial category focuses on external rewards such as expected opponents in terms of product stability and reliability future returns and personal needs. This article also [15], and that open source projects lack the capability to reports the results of a survey administered to open innovate. -
UNIX History Page 1 Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:02 PM
UNIX History Page 1 Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:02 PM CHAPTER 1 UNIX Evolution and Standardization This chapter introduces UNIX from a historical perspective, showing how the various UNIX versions have evolved over the years since the very first implementation in 1969 to the present day. The chapter also traces the history of the different attempts at standardization that have produced widely adopted standards such as POSIX and the Single UNIX Specification. The material presented here is not intended to document all of the UNIX variants, but rather describes the early UNIX implementations along with those companies and bodies that have had a major impact on the direction and evolution of UNIX. A Brief Walk through Time There are numerous events in the computer industry that have occurred since UNIX started life as a small project in Bell Labs in 1969. UNIX history has been largely influenced by Bell Labs’ Research Editions of UNIX, AT&T’s System V UNIX, Berkeley’s Software Distribution (BSD), and Sun Microsystems’ SunOS and Solaris operating systems. The following list shows the major events that have happened throughout the history of UNIX. Later sections describe some of these events in more detail. 1 UNIX History Page 2 Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:02 PM 2 UNIX Filesystems—Evolution, Design, and Implementation 1969. Development on UNIX starts in AT&T’s Bell Labs. 1971. 1st Edition UNIX is released. 1973. 4th Edition UNIX is released. This is the first version of UNIX that had the kernel written in C. 1974. Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie publish their classic paper, “The UNIX Timesharing System” [RITC74]. -
The Trademark History of Linux, the Operating System by Tonya Gisselberg Copyright ©2010 by Tonya Gisselberg
The Trademark History of Linux, the Operating System by Tonya Gisselberg Copyright ©2010 by Tonya Gisselberg I. Introduction Despite its name, this article is about more than the trademark history of Linux. It begins at the prehistory of Linux and incorporates other areas of intellectual property on the theory that looking at the subject from its all-inclusive intellectual property context adds depth and understanding to the trademark discussion. A good portion of this article is devoted to telling the Linux story - a fascinating and inspirational story. Telling the Linux story is also a necessary component of describing the history of Linux trademarks. A trademark is used by the trademark owner “to identify and distinguish his or her goods, including a unique product, from those manufactured or sold by others and to indicate the source of the goods, even if that source is unknown.”1 A trademark can identify a particular technology, such as Dolby® Surround technology. 2 Under the statutory definition, a trademark cannot have an existence independent from a good or service. “There is no such thing as property in a trade- mark except as a right appurtenant to an established business or trade in connection with which the mark is employed.”3 If there is no identifiable good or protectable technology, but instead, a public domain good or technology that anyone can freely copy and use, then there is nothing to trademark. This is particularly true when the product is something as functional and commoditized as software. Ubuntu 4 Linux and Red Hat 5 Linux are valid trademarks apart from the software because the companies that own those trademarks also sell services. -
In Search of Stupidity: Over 20 Years of High-Tech Marketing Disasters
CYAN YELLOW MAGENTA BLACK PANTONE 123 CV Chapman “A funny AND grim read that explains why so many of the high-tech sales departments I’ve trained and written about over the years frequently have Merrill R.Chapman homicidal impulses towards their marketing groups. A must read.” Foreword by Eric Sink —Mike Bosworth Author of Solution Selling, Creating Buyers in Difficult Selling Markets and coauthor of Customer Centric Selling In Search of Stupidity In Search OVER 20 YEARS OF HIGH-TECH MARKETING DISASTERS 20 YEARS OF HIGH-TECH OVER n 1982 Tom Peters and Robert Waterman Ikicked off the modern business book era with In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies. Unfortunately, as time went by it became painfully obvious that many of the companies Peters and Waterman had profiled, particularly the high-tech ones, were something less than excellent. Firms such as Atari, DEC, IBM, Lanier, Wang, Xerox and others either crashed and burned or underwent painful and wrenching traumas you would have expected excellent companies to avoid. What went wrong? Merrill R. (Rick) Chapman believes he has the answer (and the proof is in these pages). He’s observed that high-tech companies periodically meltdown because they fail to learn from the lessons of the past and thus continue to make the same completely avoidable mistakes again and again and again. To help teach you this, In Search of Stupidity takes you on a fascinating journey from yesterday to today as it salvages some of high-tech’s most famous car wrecks. You will be there as MicroPro, once the industry’s largest desktop software company, destroys itself by committing a fundamental positioning mistake. -
Microsoft Corporation
A Progressive Digital Media business COMPANY PROFILE Microsoft Corporation REFERENCE CODE: 8ABE78BB-0732-4ACA-A41D-3012EBB1334D PUBLICATION DATE: 25 Jul 2017 www.marketline.com COPYRIGHT MARKETLINE. THIS CONTENT IS A LICENSED PRODUCT AND IS NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED OR DISTRIBUTED Microsoft Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Company Overview ........................................................................................................3 Key Facts.........................................................................................................................3 Business Description .....................................................................................................4 History .............................................................................................................................5 Key Employees .............................................................................................................26 Key Employee Biographies .........................................................................................28 Major Products & Services ..........................................................................................35 SWOT Analysis .............................................................................................................36 Top Competitors ...........................................................................................................44 Company View ..............................................................................................................45 -
The Story of Novell
**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE** EDITORS: For review copies or interview requests, contact: Roger Bourke White Jr. Tel: 801-883-9731 Email: [email protected] (When requesting a review copy, please provide a street address.) The Story of Novell: A Leading Software and Services Corporation Discover what it’s like to be on the brink of multi-million dollar success SALT LAKE CITY – As PC-based technology becomes increasingly vital to everyday life, many wonder how it all began. Roger Bourke White Jr. was there in 1981, on the ground floor of Novell Inc., a crucial information technology (IT) company in the 1990s and 2000s. Surfing the High Tech Wave: A History of Novell 1980 - 1990 (published by AuthorHouse) tells Novell’s story of rising from near bankruptcy in 1982 to controlling 70% of the marketplace in 1990. Novell started with the ambition to be a computer, terminal and printer maker, but that dream failed. While the walls were crashing down around them, four computer programmers were working diligently on a second dream, the Local Area Network (LAN) product. What became known as Netware, the LAN would succeed mightily and give Novell a prominent name in the software marketplace. The computer networking market would have developed in a very different way without the hard work and dedication of these four men, the ten other survivors of the first dream and legendary IT entrepreneur Ray Noorda. Follow Novell on a rollercoaster ride of aspiration and growth, then experimentation and failure and finally rebirth and blinding success. The original Novell founders risked it all and failed. -
Microsoft from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation, Search
Microsoft From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Coordinates: 47°38′22.55″N 122°7′42.42″W / 47.6395972°N 122.12845°W / 47.6395972; -122.12845 Microsoft Corporation Public (NASDAQ: MSFT) Dow Jones Industrial Average Type Component S&P 500 Component Computer software Consumer electronics Digital distribution Computer hardware Industry Video games IT consulting Online advertising Retail stores Automotive software Albuquerque, New Mexico Founded April 4, 1975 Bill Gates Founder(s) Paul Allen One Microsoft Way Headquarters Redmond, Washington, United States Area served Worldwide Key people Steve Ballmer (CEO) Brian Kevin Turner (COO) Bill Gates (Chairman) Ray Ozzie (CSA) Craig Mundie (CRSO) Products See products listing Services See services listing Revenue $62.484 billion (2010) Operating income $24.098 billion (2010) Profit $18.760 billion (2010) Total assets $86.113 billion (2010) Total equity $46.175 billion (2010) Employees 89,000 (2010) Subsidiaries List of acquisitions Website microsoft.com Microsoft Corporation is an American public multinational corporation headquartered in Redmond, Washington, USA that develops, manufactures, licenses, and supports a wide range of products and services predominantly related to computing through its various product divisions. Established on April 4, 1975 to develop and sell BASIC interpreters for the Altair 8800, Microsoft rose to dominate the home computer operating system (OS) market with MS-DOS in the mid-1980s, followed by the Microsoft Windows line of OSes. Microsoft would also come to dominate the office suite market with Microsoft Office. The company has diversified in recent years into the video game industry with the Xbox and its successor, the Xbox 360 as well as into the consumer electronics market with Zune and the Windows Phone OS. -
At Home with Your Computer
DEC 1995 Britain's favourite Personal Computer magazine MORTAL KOMBAT MANIA PAGE 98 Consumer PC/TVs Mortal Kombat mania ● December 1995 £2.95 Pentium Pro Arrives: Viglen’s P6 Powerhouse Overseas Price £3.95 France 110 FF Germany DM 20,00 WIN a Pentium ● Italy 18,000 Lire Spain 1,225 PTS Malta Lm 2.85c Holland HFL 17,95 Belgium 364.00 BFr Notebook p.266 Group Tests : Anti-virus packages, Storage and backup media Finland FIM 49.50 Canada CAN$12.95 VNU Business Publications At home with your PC/TVsPC/TVs computer ● Office hybrids: printer/fax/scanner Pentium Pro arrives First glimpse of ● HP Omnibook 600CT Viglen’s P6 Office hybrids Printer/ ● fax/ RAM Doublers scanner RAM Doublers Memory for less? IF YOUR CD-ROM OR 3.5" DISK ARE MISSING Anti-Virus packages ASK YOUR NEWSAGENT Seven of the best tested ALL HARDWARE TESTED BY THE VNU LABS VOL18 NO12 Group Test All sorts of storage stuff December 1995 PCW December 1995 Contents Regulars Hands On 110 Group Tests First Impressions 55 18 Newsprint PCTVs Storage and Backup 56 Gadgets Macro virus sweeps the world. Intel 134 launches the (P6) Pentium Pro. First 60 HP Omnibook 600 CT Cited as the next big growth Hardware look at “Pentium class” chip for hand- ● Often a secondary concern, storage and The latest model in Hewlett-Packard’s helds. Eight-speed CD drives. New area for PCs, the home Omnibook range will give your desktop print system sprouts cheap lasers. backup devices play an important part in com- a run for its money. -
KCG 2013 HARDWARE/IT MAP Report - SERVERS
KCG 2013 HARDWARE/IT MAP Report - SERVERS Program Effectiveness Metrics Shortlisting DUMMY DATA Analysts vendor months 2=REACTIVE Responsiveness Efficacyof Comms OverallEffectiveness Access Executives to Interactions perQuarter that would shortlist vendor that would net yearnet on increase or Proactivity (1=PROACTIVE- last 3 months in THIS segment last 3months in Likely or Very Likely to shortlist Likely or Very shortlisted THIS vendor in last3 shortlisted % of analysts that are % of responding they shortlisted THIS vendor in the they shortlisted Total number of analysts Indicating number of analystsIndicating Total (decrease)in percentage ofanalysts %of analyststhat shortlist that have Quality and Availability of References Availability Quality and threshold of analyst responses (20%) Vendors receivingless than Vendors SERVERS SEGMENT AVERAGE 3.25 6.69 6.13 5.80 7.08 6.69 1.51 10.82 33% 48% 14% 2013 HARDWARE/IT SAPA AVERAGE 3.17 6.64 6.09 5.82 7.06 6.67 1.49 10.15 32% 48% 13% ANALYSTS PARTICIPATING ATTO Analysts Participating 14 BlueArc Vendor Count IPQ AE REF EFF RESP OE PRO 3 MOS %3 MOS LTS YOY Analyst Firm Canon 22 Acer 14 3.07 6.14 5.00 4.69 7.43 6.93 1.31 5 30% 31% 0% 1 Tim Bajarin Creative Strategies, Inc Panasas AMD 12 3.08 7.00 6.08 5.83 7.17 6.83 1.42 3 26% 50% 0% 2 Tony Prigmore Enterprise Strategy Group Pillar Apple 15 3.00 7.00 6.07 7.06 7.13 7.71 1.93 10 33% 61% 0% 3 Andrew Butler Gartner PMC/Adaptec ARM 31 4.52 7.00 6.06 5.18 7.26 6.86 1.59 20 40% 55% 37% 4 Donna Scott Gartner Scale Computing Cisco 36 4.25 6.08 5.69 5.95