Micro Focus Story Is Part
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Current Status of OFED in SUSE Linux Enterprise Server
Current Status of OFED in SUSE Linux Enterprise Server John Jolly Senior Software Engineer SUSE Agenda 2 λAbout SUSE λAbout SUSE Linux Enterprise Server λOFED Integration into SLES λFuture Direction of OFED in SLES SUSE and the Attachmate Group λSUSE , headquartered in Nürnberg / Germany, λis an independently operating business unit of λThe Attachmate Group, Inc. λThe Attachmate Group is a privately held λ1 billion+ $ revenue software company λwith four brands: •Cloud Infrastructure •Enterprise Computing •Integrated Systems SUSE® Linux Enterprise How We Build It Online Repository Source Package Image OBS OBS user submits source to OBS and gets a product SUSE® Linux Enterprise Server 12 Lifecyle Model •13-year lifecycle (10 years general support, 3 years extended support) •5-year lifecycle per Service Pack (2 years general + 3 years extended support) •Long Term Service Pack Support (LTSS) available for all versions, including GA http://www.suse.com/lifecycle/ Unique Tools Included λAppArmor Security Framework -Application confinement λFree High Availability Extension -Cluster Framework, Cluster FS, DRBD, GEO-cluster* λYaST2 systems management -Install, deploy, and configure every aspect of the server λSubscription Management Tool -Subscription and patch management, proxy/mirroring/staging λStarter System for System z -A pre-built installation server, deployable with z/VM tools Features of SLES 12 λLinux Kernel 3.12 λOnly 64-bit kernel -Support of 32-bit application through execution environment λYaST modules written in Ruby λOFED 3.12 -Significant -
Twenty Years of Berkeley Unix : from AT&T-Owned to Freely
Twenty Years of Berkeley Unix : From AT&T-Owned to Freely Redistributable Marshall Kirk McKusick Early History Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie presented the first Unix paper at the Symposium on Operating Systems Principles at Purdue University in November 1973. Professor Bob Fabry, of the University of California at Berkeley, was in attendance and immediately became interested in obtaining a copy of the system to experiment with at Berkeley. At the time, Berkeley had only large mainframe computer systems doing batch processing, so the first order of business was to get a PDP-11/45 suitable for running with the then-current Version 4 of Unix. The Computer Science Department at Berkeley, together with the Mathematics Department and the Statistics Department, were able to jointly purchase a PDP-11/45. In January 1974, a Version 4 tape was delivered and Unix was installed by graduate student Keith Standiford. Although Ken Thompson at Purdue was not involved in the installation at Berkeley as he had been for most systems up to that time, his expertise was soon needed to determine the cause of several strange system crashes. Because Berkeley had only a 300-baud acoustic-coupled modem without auto answer capability, Thompson would call Standiford in the machine room and have him insert the phone into the modem; in this way Thompson was able to remotely debug crash dumps from New Jersey. Many of the crashes were caused by the disk controller's inability to reliably do overlapped seeks, contrary to the documentation. Berkeley's 11/45 was among the first systems that Thompson had encountered that had two disks on the same controller! Thompson's remote debugging was the first example of the cooperation that sprang up between Berkeley and Bell Labs. -
Relevé Des Frais Annuels De L'entente De Licence Destinée À L
Relevé des frais annuels de l’entente de licence destinée à l’enseignement postsecondaire AOÛT 2016 Les Informations de Programme scolaire Relient Les Instructions de Sélection de produit : As part of the compliance and annual order process, this worksheet must be sent to [email protected] (for Europe, Middle East, Africa) or [email protected] (rest of world). Sélectionnez un seul modèle : ___ Modèle ETP; ___ Modèle par poste de travail; ___ Modèle par poste de travail de service EMBALLER CALCUL INSTRUCTIONS : A. Place une marque dans le Modèle de colonne A Choisi la boîte des produits que vous souhaitez acheter OU choisir un Paquet de Valeur. Si un Paquet de Valeur n'est pas choisi, au moins quatre (4) les produits doivent être choisis. B. Calcule le Total A Emballé le Prix (TBP) en ajoutant les prix appropriés des produits choisis et le modèle d'évaluation approprié. C. Le Total A Emballé le Prix sera utilisé pour calculer les Frais annuels. Vous ne pouvez pas utiliser le modèle de FTE dans calculer vos Frais annuels à moins que votre population de FTE dépasse votre compte de poste de travail. POUR EMPECHER DES RETARDS DANS TRAITER VOTRE ORDRE DE RENOUVELLEMENT, S'IL VOUS PLAIT SOUMETTRE VOTRE FACTURE D'ACHAT ET VOTRE FEUILLE DE TRAVAIL COMPLETEE ENSEMBLE MOBILE DEVICE LICENSE: Upon purchase of a license for Novell ZENworks Mobile Management, the following terms become part of Your ALA. To acquire a Mobile Device License, You must purchase a license for each Mobile Device. To acquire a FTE license, you must purchase a license for all FTE. -
Bytes Technology Group
This document comprises a prospectus (the "Prospectus") for the purposes of Regulation (EU) 2017/1129, as amended (the "Prospectus Regulation") relating to Bytes Technology Group plc (the "Company") prepared in accordance with the Prospectus Regulation Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (the "FCA") made under section 73A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the "FSMA") and a pre-listing statement prepared in accordance with the applicable JSE Listings Requirements. A copy of this Prospectus has been filed with, and approved by, the FCA and the JSE and has been made available to the public in accordance with the Prospectus Regulation Rules. The FCA only approves this Prospectus as meeting the standards of completeness, comprehensibility and consistency imposed by the Prospectus Regulation. Such approval should not be considered as an endorsement of the Company that is, or the quality of the securities that are, the subject of this Prospectus. Investors should make their own assessment as to the suitability of investing in the ordinary shares in the capital of the Company (the "Shares"). Application will be made to the FCA for all of the Shares, issued and to be issued in connection with the Offer to be admitted to the premium listing segment of the Official List of the FCA and to London Stock Exchange plc (the "London Stock Exchange") for all of the Shares to be admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange's main market for listed securities (the "Main Market") (together, "Admission"). Conditional dealings in the Shares are expected to commence on the Main Market at 8.00 a.m. -
United States Court of Appeals for the FOURTH CIRCUIT
Case: 10-1482 Document: 35 Date Filed: 09/17/2010 Page: 1 No. 10-1482 IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT dNOVELL, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, —v.— MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BRIEF OF APPELLEE MICROSOFT CORPORATION RICHARD J. WALLIS DAVID B.TULCHIN STEVEN J. AESCHBACHER Counsel of Record MICROSOFT CORPORATION STEVEN L. HOLLEY One Microsoft Way SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP Redmond, Washington 98052 125 Broad Street (425) 882-8080 New York, New York 10004 (212) 558-4000 G. S TEWART WEBB VENABLE LLP 750 East Pratt Street, Suite 900 Baltimore, Maryland 21202 (410) 244-7400 Attorneys for Microsoft Corporation September 17, 2010 Case: 10-1482 Document: 35 Date Filed: 09/17/2010 Page: 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS AND OTHER INTERESTS Only one form needs to be completed for a party even if the party is represented by more than one attorney. Disclosures must be filed on behalf of all parties to a civil, agency, bankruptcy or mandamus case. Corporate defendants in a criminal or post-conviction case and corporate amici curiae are required to file disclosure statements. Counsel has a continuing duty to update this information. No. _______ Caption: __________________________________________________ Pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and Local Rule 26.1, ______________________ who is _______________________, makes the following disclosure: (name of party/amicus) (appellant/appellee/amicus) 1. Is party/amicus a publicly held corporation or other publicly held entity? YES NO 2. Does party/amicus have any parent corporations? YES NO If yes, identify all parent corporations, including grandparent and great-grandparent corporations: 3. -
OES 2015 SP1: Installation Guide Is Available at the Open Enterprise Server 2015 SP1 Documentation Website
Open Enterprise Server 2015 SP1 Installation Guide June 2016 Legal Notices For information about legal notices, trademarks, disclaimers, warranties, export and other use restrictions, U.S. Government rights, patent policy, and FIPS compliance, see https://www.novell.com/company/legal/. Copyright © 2016 Novell, Inc., a Micro Focus company. All Rights Reserved. Contents About This Guide 9 1 What’s New or Changed in the OES Install 11 1.1 What’s New (Update 28-OES 2015 SP1). .11 1.2 What’s New (OES 2015 SP1) . 11 1.3 What’s New (January 2016 eDirectory 8.8 SP8 Patch 6 Hot Patch 1). 12 1.4 What’s New (OES 2015) . 12 2 Preparing to Install OES 2015 SP1 15 2.1 Before You Install . 15 2.2 Meeting All Server Software and Hardware Requirements . 15 2.2.1 Server Software . 15 2.2.2 Server Hardware . 16 2.3 NetIQ eDirectory Rights Needed for Installing OES. 17 2.3.1 Rights to Install the First OES Server in a Tree . 17 2.3.2 Rights to Install the First Three Servers in an eDirectory Tree . 17 2.3.3 Rights to Install the First Three Servers in any eDirectory Partition . 17 2.4 Installing and Configuring OES as a Subcontainer Administrator . 17 2.4.1 Rights Required for Subcontainer Administrators . 18 2.4.2 Providing Required Rights to the Subcontainer Administrator for Installing and Managing Samba. 20 2.4.3 Starting a New Installation as a Subcontainer Administrator . 22 2.4.4 Adding/Configuring OES Services as a Different Administrator. -
Directors' Remuneration Policy
Overview Compliance statement This Directors’ Remuneration report has been prepared on DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY behalf of the board by the committee and complies with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006 and Schedule 8 of The This section of the report sets out the proposed new report Strategic Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Remuneration Policy for directors. A binding shareholder Reports) Regulations 2008, as amended (the UK Regulations). resolution to approve the Remuneration Policy will be proposed The report has been prepared in line with the applicable UK at the 2020 Annual General Meeting (“AGM”) on 25 March 2020 Corporate Governance Code and the UK Listing Rules. and, subject to shareholder approval, will be effective from the conclusion of the AGM for a period of three years. Subject to The Corporate Governance Code issued in June 2018 (the 2018 approval of the proposed new policy, the 2020 annual bonus Code) and the provisions of the Companies (Miscellaneous plan and the 2020 LTIP grants will be operated under the new Reporting) Regulations 2018 (the 2018 Reporting Regulations) policy. The key changes from the previous Remuneration Policy which relate to annual remuneration reports (as opposed to (which was first published on pages 72 to 82 of the 2017 Annual Report and Accounts and which was approved by shareholders remuneration policy reports) do not apply to this Directors’ governance Corporate Remuneration report, as, in both cases, they apply to reporting at the September 2017 AGM) and the rationale for the changes years commencing on or after 1 January 2019. -
School License Agreement Annual Fee Worksheet - EMEA MAY 2016 Academic Program Information Link Product Selection & Bundle Calculation Instructions
School License Agreement Annual Fee Worksheet - EMEA MAY 2016 Academic Program Information Link Product Selection & Bundle Calculation Instructions: As part of the compliance and annual order process, this worksheet must be sent to [email protected] (for Europe, Middle East, Africa) or [email protected] (rest of world). 1. Select any of the bundles or products below by checking the box in the Model Selected column. Any combination of products or bundles may be selected for a minimum price of $2.36 USD per enrollment or $35.70 USD per Workstation. $1000 minimum total purchase price. 2. Compute the Total Price based on the total cost of the products selected and compute the Annual Fee by multiplying the total Enrollment/Workstation/Mobile Device number by the total price. For example: 1 Bundle @ 2.25 plus 2 Additional products ($0.60 ea) = $3.45 total price x enrollment of 1,000 = Annual Fee $3,450. MOBILE DEVICE LICENSE: Upon purchase of a license for Novell ZENworks Mobile Management, the following terms become part of Your SLA. To acquire a Mobile Device License, You must purchase a license for each Mobile Device. To acquire a FTE license, you must purchase a license for all FTE. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the license purchase authorizes You to install and use one copy of the Mobile Management Application on each Mobile Device (for an FTE license, for each Mobile Device used by an FTE person). This license allows You to use the Software solely to manage licensed Mobile Devices. You may not use or allow the use of the Software other than for Your own internal purposes. -
Motivations of Participating in Open Source Projects
Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2001 Working for Free? – Motivations of Participating in Open Source Projects Alexander Hars Shaosong Ou IOM Department IOM Department Marshall School of Business Marshall School of Business University of Southern California University of Southern California [email protected] [email protected] Abstract the public, including the right to use, to redistribute and to The success of the Linux operating system has modify the software free of charge. This is a direct demonstrated the viability of an alternative form of challenge to the established assumptions about software software development – open source software – that markets that threatens the position of commercial challenges traditional assumptions about software software vendors. markets. Understanding what drives open source The open source phenomenon raises many interesting developers to participate in open source projects is questions. Its proponents regard it as a paradigmatic crucial for assessing the impact of open source software. change where the economics of private goods built on the This article identifies two broad types of motivations that scarcity of resources are replaced by the economics of account for their participation in open source projects. public goods where scarcity is not an issue. Critics argue The first category includes internal factors such as that open source software will always be relegated to intrinsic motivation and altruism, and the second niche areas, that it cannot compete with their commercial category focuses on external rewards such as expected opponents in terms of product stability and reliability future returns and personal needs. This article also [15], and that open source projects lack the capability to reports the results of a survey administered to open innovate. -
Netiq Securelogin User Guide About This Guide
User Guide SecureLogin 8.0 October, 2013 Legal Notice NetIQ Product Name is protected by United States Patent No(s): nnnnnnnn, nnnnnnnn, nnnnnnnn. THIS DOCUMENT AND THE SOFTWARE DESCRIBED IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE FURNISHED UNDER AND ARE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT OR A NON‐DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT. EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN SUCH LICENSE AGREEMENT OR NON‐DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT, NETIQ CORPORATION PROVIDES THIS DOCUMENT AND THE SOFTWARE DESCRIBED IN THIS DOCUMENT ʺAS ISʺ WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW DISCLAIMERS OF EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES IN CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS; THEREFORE, THIS STATEMENT MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU. For purposes of clarity, any module, adapter or other similar material (ʺModuleʺ) is licensed under the terms and conditions of the End User License Agreement for the applicable version of the NetIQ product or software to which it relates or interoperates with, and by accessing, copying or using a Module you agree to be bound by such terms. If you do not agree to the terms of the End User License Agreement you are not authorized to use, access or copy a Module and you must destroy all copies of the Module and contact NetIQ for further instructions. This document and the software described in this document may not be lent, sold, or given away without the prior written permission of NetIQ Corporation, except as otherwise permitted by law. Except as expressly set forth in such license agreement or non‐disclosure agreement, no part of this document or the software described in this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, without the prior written consent of NetIQ Corporation. -
UNIX History Page 1 Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:02 PM
UNIX History Page 1 Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:02 PM CHAPTER 1 UNIX Evolution and Standardization This chapter introduces UNIX from a historical perspective, showing how the various UNIX versions have evolved over the years since the very first implementation in 1969 to the present day. The chapter also traces the history of the different attempts at standardization that have produced widely adopted standards such as POSIX and the Single UNIX Specification. The material presented here is not intended to document all of the UNIX variants, but rather describes the early UNIX implementations along with those companies and bodies that have had a major impact on the direction and evolution of UNIX. A Brief Walk through Time There are numerous events in the computer industry that have occurred since UNIX started life as a small project in Bell Labs in 1969. UNIX history has been largely influenced by Bell Labs’ Research Editions of UNIX, AT&T’s System V UNIX, Berkeley’s Software Distribution (BSD), and Sun Microsystems’ SunOS and Solaris operating systems. The following list shows the major events that have happened throughout the history of UNIX. Later sections describe some of these events in more detail. 1 UNIX History Page 2 Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:02 PM 2 UNIX Filesystems—Evolution, Design, and Implementation 1969. Development on UNIX starts in AT&T’s Bell Labs. 1971. 1st Edition UNIX is released. 1973. 4th Edition UNIX is released. This is the first version of UNIX that had the kernel written in C. 1974. Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie publish their classic paper, “The UNIX Timesharing System” [RITC74]. -
Oes 2018 Sp2)
Open Enterprise Server 2018 SP2 Installation Guide August 2020 Legal Notices Copyright © 2017 - 2020 Micro Focus or one of its affiliates. The only warranties for products and services of Micro Focus and its affiliates and licensors (“Micro Focus”) are as may be set forth in the express warranty statements accompanying such products and services. Nothing herein should be construed as constituting an additional warranty. Micro Focus shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Contents About This Guide 9 1 What’s New or Changed in the OES Install 11 1.1 What’s New or Changed (OES 2018 SP2) . .11 1.2 What’s New or Changed (OES 2018 SP1) . .11 1.3 What's New or Changed (Update 6 - OES 2018 - Recommended) . 12 1.4 What’s New or Changed (OES 2018) . 12 2 Preparing to Install OES 2018 SP2 13 2.1 Before You Install . 13 2.2 Meeting All Server Software and Hardware Requirements . 13 2.2.1 Server Software . 13 2.2.2 Server Hardware . 14 2.3 NetIQ eDirectory Rights Needed for Installing OES. .15 2.3.1 Rights to Install the First OES Server in a Tree . 15 2.3.2 Rights to Install the First Three Servers in an eDirectory Tree . 15 2.3.3 Rights to Install the First Three Servers in any eDirectory Partition . 15 2.4 Installing and Configuring OES as a Subcontainer Administrator . 15 2.4.1 Rights Required for Subcontainer Administrators . 16 2.4.2 Providing Required Rights to the Subcontainer Administrator for Installing and Managing Samba.