Association of Asian Universities: Rankings Game
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Association of Asian Universities: Rankings Game Zoya Zaitseva Regional Director | QS Intelligence Unit QS – PART OF THE SOLUTION #1 player in Higher Education Rankings – only rankings used by Chinese Government in their World Class University Assessment Audit as well as Ministry of HCD India #1 player in Higher Education Student Recruitment events - >350 events in 57 countries & over 250,000 candidates per annum #1 player in Higher Education Online Portals – over 65million visitors in 2017 #1 Outsource Enrolment Solutions provider supported by 2 million International Students in our global database #1 dedicated higher education research house - QSIU Regional Conferences and branding solutions, including Wharton-QS Reimagine Education Awards Mobility, Partnership and Application Management Software 1200 Higher Education clients and 94% re-booking rate in 2017 SUPPORTING UNIVERSITY LEADERS TOWARDS PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT Quality • QS Rankings • QS Star Ratings Assurance • Country & System Accreditations • Rankings Trackers Analytics • Academic Reputation Dataset • Employer Reputation Dataset Consulting • Partnership & Mobility Software & • Branding & Conference Solutions Technology • Best practice consulting 4 INTELLIGENCE UNIT GLOBAL UNIVERSITY RANKINGS ’03 ’04 ’05 ’06 ’07 ’08 ’09 ’10 ’11 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 ’16 ‘17 ▪ Academic performance with 1 ARWU/Shanghai league table 2 Webometrics ▪ Academic performance without league table 3 QS 4 4icu ▪ Broad based league table 5 NTU/HEEACT ▪ “Multidimensional” ranking 6 Leiden ▪ Employability based league 7 URAP table 8 SCImago R R R R R R R ▪ Web presence league table 9 THE 10 Trendence/Emerging R▪ Retroactive 11 RUR R R R E▪ Environmental Focus 12 U-Multirank 13 UI GreenMetric E E E E E e ▪I Innovation Focus 14 CWUR 15 Youth Incorporated 16 nature INDEX 17 RankPro 18 US News 19 Reuters I I i 20 3 Missions Source: Illuminate Consulting Group BY BY BY BY BY REGION SUBJECT CONTEXT MISSION TYPE 48 SPECIFIC BEST STUDENT GRADUATE QS ASIA SUBJECTS CITIES EMPLOYABILITY CLASSIFICATIONS REIMAGINE TOP 50 UNDER LATIN AMERICA 5 BROAD AREAS HE SYSTEMS EDUCATION 50 ARAB REGION GLOBAL MBA QS STARS DISTANCE/ EECA ONLINE MBA BRICS EMBA BUSINESS MASTERS 6 QS RANKINGS METHODOLOGY COMPARING METHODOLOGIES WUR ASIA Latin ARAB BRICS EECA 7 (2004) (2009) (2011) (2014) (2013) (2014) QS WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKINGS 2019 IN NUMBERS OVER NEARLY NEARLY 4,700 151 13m 67m COUNTRIES COVERED UNIVERSITIES PAPERS CITATIONS IN SURVEY ANALYSIS CONSIDERED OVER OVER OVER OVER 83,000 42,000 1.4m 1,200 INSTITUTIONS ACADEMIC RESPONSES EMPLOYER RESPONSES SURVEY NOMINATIONS EVALUATED 21 60 1,011 1,000 SPECIALISTS NEW ENTRANTS RANKED PUBLISHED CONSIDERED 8 1,000 85 1,011 21 COUNTRIES COVERED INSTITUTIONS SPECIALISTS UNIVERSITIES (TOP 1000) RANKED EVALUATED DISTRIBUTION OF INSTITUTIONS BY REGION 6.4% 9.1% 39.9% QS 18.1% World University Rankings 2019 26.5% ACADEMIC REPUTATION 83,877 1,258,811 151 ACADEMIC ACADEMIC COUNTRIES RESPONDENTS NOMINATIONS FEATURED +12% +38% NUMBER OF INSTITUTIONS NOMINATED BY ACADEMICS There has been an increase of almost 9% in the number of 4,764 2019 institutions nominated by academics globally. 4,378 2018 EMPLOYER REPUTATION 42,862 199,123 142 EMPLOYER EMPLOYER COUNTRIES RESPONDENTS NOMINATIONS FEATURED +6% +38% The US, Europe and Australia NUMBER OF INSTITUTIONS NOMINATED BY EMPLOYERS 38% dominate the Employer Reputation indicator, with particular success in the 4,063 INCREASE IN ACADEMIC & attraction of international nominations. 2019 EMPLOYER NOMINATIONS China, India and Russia are also showing solid results but with stronger 3,494 focus on their national markets. 2018 RECEIVED ACADEMIC NOMINATIONS: DISTRIBUTION BY COUNTRY 1,258,811 ACADEMIC NOMINATIONS FROM 83,877 RESPONDENTS NOMINATING 4,764 International Domestic UNIVERSITIES RECEIVED EMPLOYER NOMINATIONS: DISTRIBUTION BY COUNTRY 199,123 EMPLOYER NOMINATIONS FROM 42,862 RESPONDENTS NOMINATING 4,063 International Domestic UNIVERSITIES 47,199 22.2% AVERAGE CITATIONS YEAR ON YEAR PER INSTITUTION INCREASE 4,964 AVERAGE RECORDS PER INSTITUTION 12.1% YEAR ON YEAR INCREASE WUR University – RUSSIA - 27 2017 2018 Change Lomonosov Moscow State University 95= 90 5 Saint-PetersburgRUSSIA State University IN THE QS WORLD UNIVERSITY 240=RANKINGS235 2019 5 Novosibirsk State University 250= 244= 6 Tomsk State University 323= 277= 46 Bauman Moscow State Technical University 291 299= -8 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology State University 355= 312 43 National Research Nuclear University "MEPhI" 373= 329= 44 NRU - Higher School of Economics (HSE) 382= 343= 39 MGIMO University 373= 355= 18 Tomsk Polytechnic University 386= 373= 13 Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University 401-410 404 6 Ural Federal University 491-500 412= 88 Kazan Federal University 441-450 439= 11 RUDN University 501-600 446= 154 National University of Science and Technology "MISIS" 501-550 476= 74 National Research Saratov State University 551-600 501-510 50+ ITMO University 601-650 511-520 100+ Southern Federal University (SFEDU) 551-600 531-540 50+ Far Eastern Federal University 601-650 541-550 100+ Altai State University 601-650 New N.I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod 701-750 601-650 100+ Samara National Research University (Samara University) 801-1000 701-750 200+ Siberian Federal University 801-1000 New South Ural State University 801-1000 New Plekhanov Russian University of Economics 801-1000 801-1000 0 Voronezh State University 801-1000 801-1000 0 Novosibirsk State Technical University 801-1000 801-1000 0 WUR University – Kazakhstan - 10 2019 2018 Two new entries from Al-Farabi Kazakh National University 220 236= Kazakhstan this year and rather positive dynamic for L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University 394= 336 the country – out of 10 ranked 3 improved and 3 Kazakh National Technical University after K.I.Satpayev 464= 411-420 stayed within the same group which means not M.O.Auezov South Kazakhstan State University 480 501-550 only they’ve performed better than themselves last Kazakh National Pedagogical University Abai 481= 491-500 year, but also better than world average change. E.A.Buketov Karaganda State University 651-700 651-700 Kazakh National Agrarian University 651-700 Best growth was achieved in Student/Faculty ratio. Kazakh-British Technical University 651-700 651-700 Employer Reputation came second best. Karaganda State Technical University 751-800 Most challenging Kazakh Ablai khan University of International Relations and World indicators: Citations per 801-1000 801-1000 Languages Faculty and Academic 15 Reputation. BUT WHICH RANKING IS MORE USEFUL? ❑ Do you know what your 5 strongest subjects are? Source: QS Student Ranking Survey SUBJECT SENSITIVE WEIGHTINGS 17 18 CRITICAL RANKINGS STATISTICS WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE ? WORLD UNIVERSITY REGIONAL RANKINGS: RANKINGS EECA Faculty Staff & International Faculty Staff Undergraduate & International Undergraduate Students Graduate / Postgraduate & International Students Overall Student & International Students Domestic & International Tuition Fees FACULTY STAFF WITH PHD Rankings have many faults and do not adequately describe universities and cannot show whether one institution is better than another… …but I am very happy when Cambridge is rated as the top university in the world ALISON RICHARD Former Vice-Chancellor University of Cambridge WHAT INSTITUTIONS NEED Global Engagement & Visibility • Greater insight, understanding and intelligence regarding the national and global rankings of the institution through access to QSIU proprietary data • Conduct a comprehensive analysis of the different unaggregated reputational and research components and identify the very elements of strengths and weaknesses beyond scores and data • Mapping and modelling of existing and potential partnerships based on existing and possible university research competencies • Greater global visibility through an effective PR strategy highlighting specific actions, platforms and directions in line with the institution’s history and competencies Samara can enhance its global presence through a moreInstitutions targeted can and enhance aligned their approach global to presence planning,through partnerships a more targeted and global and aligned engagement approach to planning, partnerships and global engagement USEFUL RESOURCES 22 QS.com USEFUL LINKS Methodology: • QS World University Rankings: http://www.iu.qs.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/ • QS University Rankings by Subject: http://www.iu.qs.com/university-rankings/subject-tables/ • Data sources: http://www.iu.qs.com/university-rankings/links/ Academic Reputation: • Sources: http://www.iu.qs.com/university-rankings/indicator-academic/ • Profile of respondents: http://www.iu.qs.com/academic-survey-responses/ Results: • QS World University Rankings: https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings • QS University Rankings by Subject: https://www.topuniversities.com/subject-rankings/2018 THANK YOU! www.topuniversities.com | www.iu.qs.com [email protected] | [email protected] facebook.com/universityrankings @bensowter | @worlduniranking | #QSWUR linkedin.com/in/ zoyazaitseva QS World University Rankings 24.