Dendrochronology 459
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DENDROCHRONOLOGY 459 Taylor, R. E. (1987). Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Wintle, A. G. (1973). Anomalous fading of thermoluminescence in Perspective. Academic Press, New York. mineral samples. Nature 245, 143–144. Tuniz, C., Bird, J. R., Fink, D., and Herzog, G. F. (1998). Wohlfarth, B., Bjo¨ rck, S., Possnert, G., et al. (1993). AMS dating Accelerator Mass Spectrometry: Ultasensitive Analysis for of Swedish varved clays of the last glacial/interglacial transition Global Science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. and potential difficulties of calibrating Late Weichselian ‘‘abso- Wagner, G. A. (1995). Age Determination of Young Rocks and lute’’ chronologies. Boreas 22, 113–128. Artifacts. Springer, Berlin. Zreda, M., and Phillips, F. (2000). Cosmogenic nuclide buildup in Wehmiller, J. F., and Miller, G. H. (2000). Aminostratigraphic dating surficial materials. In Quaternary Geochronology, Methods methods in Quaternary geology. In Quaternary Geochronology, and Applications (J. S. Noller et al., Eds.), pp. 61–76. Methods and Applications (J.S.Nolleret al., Eds.), pp. 187–222. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC. Westgate, J. A., and Naeser, N. D. (1995). Tephrochronology and fission-track dating. In Dating Methods for Quaternary Relevant Website Deposits (N. W. Rutter and N. R. Catto, Eds.), pp. 15–28. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa. http://www.gg.rhul.ac.uk – Royal Holloway: Department of Geography. Dendroarchaeology see Plant Macrofossil Methods and Studies: Dendroarchaeology DENDROCHRONOLOGY D Smith and D Lewis, University of Victoria, Victoria, precipitation (Stallings, 1937). The first recorded Canada application of dendrochronology occurred in 1737 ª 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. when Du Hamel and De Buffon noted a prominent frost damaged tree ring in recently felled trees that was later recorded in both Sweden and Germany Dendrochronology (Studhalter, 1955, 1956). By the mid-1800s, the eco- logical foundations of dendrochronology were estab- Dendrochronology is the science that deals with the lished following Theodore Hartig’s studies of wood dating and study of the annual growth layers, or tree structures and annual tree-ring development rings, in woody trees and shrubs. In temperate cli- (Schweingruber, 1988). By the end of the nineteenth mates, these layers of wood (tree rings) contain sea- century, Hartig’s son, Robert, had published numer- sonal cell structures (earlywood and latewood) that ous papers on the anatomy and ecology of tree-rings, signify one annual growth ring. When all the trees at and had used tree-rings to date hail, frost, and insect a site are affected by a common environmental fac- damage in trees (Schweingruber, 1988). tor, such as climate, crossdating provides an accurate Astronomer Andrew Ellicott Douglass pioneered chronological record that can be used to date events the science of dendrochronology in North America. or describe variations in environmental conditions. In 1904, he began examining the annual rings of Due to the annual resolution possible throughout an Ponderosa pine trees in the southwestern United entire tree-ring record, dendrochronological analyses States as a potential source for preinstrumental cli- provide both reliable and ubiquitous archives for mate records. He soon established that narrow tree paleoenvironmental reconstruction. rings were formed in very dry years over large geo- graphical areas, thereby confirming that the cross- dating of tree-ring patterns between sites could be Origins and History used as a chronological tool to identify the exact Although observations of tree-ring structures and calendar year a ring was produced (Douglas, 1909). related phenomena have a lengthy history, dendro- By 1914, Douglass had developed a 500-year cross- chronology as a scientific discipline emerged relatively dated pine chronology and established a positive cor- recently. As early as the fifteenth century, Leonardo da relation between ring width and precipitation of the Vinci noted the annual nature of tree-rings, recogniz- preceding winter (Douglass, 1914). Douglass subse- ing a relationship between tree ring widths and quently devoted the next 15 years to developing long 460 DENDROCHRONOLOGY tree-ring chronologies to date wood samples from quantitative approach to dendrochronology. Huber prehistoric sites of the American southwest. His suc- developed the statistical test of similarity, the cessful crossdating of a 585-year floating (undated) Gleichlaeufigkeit (Huber, 1943; Eckstein and archeological tree-ring sequence provided precise Pilcher, 1990) that remains an integral component dates of construction for numerous previously of statistical crossdating in European laboratories. undated pueblo sites, bringing the science of dendro- In the early 1960s, Hal Fritts established the basic chronology to age as a dating tool (Dean, 1997). physiology of radial tree growth by employing a Prior to pioneering the subfields of dendroclima- dendrograph (Haasis, 1933) to measure the daily tology and dendrohydrology, Edmund Schulman growth of tree-rings. As detailed in his seminal pub- began working with Douglass to develop better lication Tree Rings and Climate (1976), Fritts was methods of tree-ring analysis (Schulman, 1945). In able to describe many of the complex connections his quest for improving the length and sensitivity of between tree-rings and climate, and used these tree-ring records, Schulman also discovered the old- insights to provide annually-resolved climate recon- est living trees in the world, the over 4,000-year-old structions for eastern and western North America bristlecone pines of the California White Mountains (Fritts, 1991). During the same time period, Polge (Schulman, 1954). This discovery was key to cali- (1966) applied X-ray densitometry to the study of brating atmospheric 14C records and set the founda- tree rings and illustrated how latewood density pro- tion for precision radiocarbon dating methods vided higher resolution dendroclimatic insights than (LaMarche and Harlan, 1973). was possible from an analysis of the total annual The basic premise of radiocarbon dating relies on ring-width increment (Lenz et al., 1976). the fixation of an unstable atmospheric carbon iso- In the last 50 years, dendrochronology has evolved tope (carbon-14) by organisms (e.g., trees) in the from a discipline primarily applied to the dating of biosphere. As long as plants and animals are living monuments and archaeological pueblos, to one with and continue to take up air in their biophysical pro- a variety of applied applications including studies of: cesses, their tissues absorb carbon-14. Once the the history and effects of pollution (Schweingruber, organism dies, its intake of carbon atoms ceases and 1988); geobotanical dating (Winchester and the amount of carbon-14 within their tissue begins to Harrison, 2000); earthquakes (Jacoby et al., 1997); decrease logarithmically at a fixed rate, which can snow avalanches (Smith et al., 1994); glacier move- then be used to determine the time since death (Libby ment (Luckman and Villalba, 2001); volcanoes et al., 1949). It was soon realized, however, that raw ( Jones et al. , 1995 ); rive r flooding (St George an d radiocarbon measurements were not equivalent to Nielso n, 2003); and insect life cycles ( Swe tnam and calendar dates, as the level of atmospheric carbon- Lynch, 1993). In addition to the continued applica- 14 has not been constant with time. Fortunately, tion of the techniques first pioneered by Douglass, long-lived trees, like the bristlecone pines studied by the introduction of new analytical techniques (i.e., Sherman (1954), retain an annual measure of the X-radiography, X-ray densitometry, neutron activa- amount of carbon-14 present in the atmosphere. By tion analysis) are providing insights into climate- crossdating the tree-ring records from both living and induced morphological and chemical changes within dead trees, and measuring the amount of carbon-14 tree-rings and wood cells, and are being used to present in each tree ring, researchers have developed described trace-element and isotopes signatures annually resolved time-series of radiocarbon concen- (Kuniholm, 2001). trations, or radiocarbon calibration curves. The raw radiocarbon date of any sample within this time- frame can then be converted to a calendar date Biological Foundation of using the calibration curves (Damon et al., 1974). Dendrochronology These tree-ring based calibrations have successfully Tree-ring formation increased the accuracy of radiocarbon dating and presently provide annually-resolved carbon-14 Tree-ring dating is possible due to the physiological records for the last 12,000 years (Friedrich et al., behavior of trees growing in locations with seasonal 2005). climates. In temperate climates, this annual growth After the Second World War, German botanist appears as ‘rings’ that vary in width in response to Bruno Huber established an ecological approach to fluctuating environmental variables (Fritts, 1976). dendrochronology in Europe. His discovery that the Although there are differences in the anatomical year-to-year variation in tree-rings was not as pro- structure of tree rings between angiosperms (decid- nounced in temperate tree species, as it was in those uous) and gymnosperms (coniferous), both tree types of semiarid zones, led to the development of a more are commonly used in dendrochronology. DENDROCHRONOLOGY 461 Radial growth in trees is achieved by the division