DOCSLIB.ORG

Investigations to Determine Presence of State-Listed Species of Fish And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investigations to Determine Presence of State-Listed Species of Fish And INVESTIGATIONS TO DETERMINE PRESENCE OF STATE-LISTED SPECIES OF FISH AND FRESHWATER MUSSELS IN THE KANKAKEE RIVER NEAR THE BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR STATION WARMWATER DISCHARGE CHANNEL Prepared for EXELON NUCLEAR Braidwood, IL HDR Engineering, Inc. 10207 Lucas Drive Woodstock, IL 60098 October 2008 Braidwood Nuclear Station State-listed Species Investigation Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 M ethods ................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Fish Sampling ...................................................................................................................... 2 2.1.1 Electrofishing ........................................................................................................ 2 2.1.2 Seining ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.3 Sample Processing ..................................................................................................... 3 2.1.4 W ater Quality M easurements ................................................................................... 4 2.2 M ussel Sampling .................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Fish Survey .......................................................................................................................... 9 3. 1.1 Electrofishing ........................................................................................................ 9 3.1.2 Seining ........................................................................................................................ 10 3.1.3 Water Quality .............................................................................................................. 10 3.2 M ussel Survey .................................................................................................................... 11 4.0 Sum m ary ............................................................................................................................. 18 5.0 References ............................................................................................................................ 20 i Rrnidfwnnf AT.rionr Vtntin. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND Exelon Generation Company is proposing to replace the existing Braidwood Nuclear Station Cooling Pond discharge (shoreline discharge channel) with a diffuser pipe placed on the bottom of the Kankakee River extending across the river near the location of the current discharge channel. The exact location will be selected following a series of engineering tests to be conducted in the river. A preliminary review of fish and freshwater mussel studies conducted in this general reach of the river indicated that fish monitoring, including the proposed area for diffuser pipe placement, has been conducted annually for the past 30 years (with the exception of 1980)(HDRILMS, 2008); but that, while several freshwater mussel surveys had been conducted in the river between Kankakee and Wilmington in the past, none had been conducted at the proposed site. The historical fisheries data indicate that pallid shiner (Notopis amnis) and river redhorse (Moxostoma carinatum), which are currently listed as endangered and threatened, respectively, by the state of Illinois, have been collected in this vicinity over the period of record. No fish species currently listed as threatened or endangered by the Federal government were collected during the past 30 years. The Kankakee River supports some of Illinois' most diverse and abundant mussel populations with 27 extant and 40 historical species (Cummings and Mayer 1997; Tiemann et al. 2007). It was surveyed several times for mussels in the 20th century including: 1909 (Wilson and Clark 1912); 1956 and 1960 (M.R. Matteson unpublished; INHS Mollusk Collection); and 1978 (Suloway 1981). Page et al. (1992) regard the mussel populations of the Kankakee River to be of national importance. Several freshwater mussel species currently listed as either endangered or threatened by the state of Illinois were collected during these earlier surveys. No freshwater mussel I Rn•,•A •nh.ln 1- nt-f; •tnfo-l;efo,• •no•.;oe lnl,•el';rrnt;nn species currently listed as threatened or endangered by the Federal government has been reported in this reach of the Kankakee River (Kramer, personal communication, 2008). 1.2 OBJECTIVES Field sampling programs were designed to collect both fish and freshwater mussels in the vicinity of the proposed diffuser site with the objectives of describing these aquatic communities and determining presence/absence of state-listed species. These data can be used to help determine whether conservation will be needed during the temporary construction disturbance and/or the permanent displacement of habitat by the diffuser pipe. 2.0 METHODS 2.1 FISH SAMPLING The fisheries component of the special studies described in this report searched for state- listed aquatic species in the vicinity of the Braidwood Nuclear Station intake and discharge using electrofishing and seining. Sampling was conducted in conjunction with the summer fish monitoring program that has been conducted annually since 1977 (excluding 1980 when sampling was not conducted). Methods were consistent with the long-term monitoring program to provide a basis for comparison to the historic data base, if necessary. 2.1.1 ELECTROFISHING Electrofishing was conducted using a boat-mounted boom-type electrofisher utilizing a 5000-watt, 230-volt-AC, 10-amp, three-phase Model GDP-5000 Multiquip generator equipped with volt/amp meters and a safety-mat cutoff switch. The electrode array consisted of three pairs of stainless steel cables (1.5-m long, 6.5 mm in diameter) arranged 1.5-m apart and suspended perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the boat 1.5-m off the bow. Each of the three electrodes was powered by one of the phases. Electrofishing samples were collected on 4 August 2008. Im 2 Rrnidwnnd Nurivar .4tntinn .qtntp.li•tpd .qnprla• Inmo•flontinn Sampling was conducted at five locations in the Kankakee River and at one site in Horse Creek (Location 2; Figure 2-1). Each sampling location (except Location 2) consisted of two stations, designated by the location number and "R" or "L", indicating the right or left side of the river as one looks upstream (Figure 2-1 & Table 2-1). Electrofishing was conducted for 30 minutes along the shoreline on each side of the river at each sampling location. Because of the close proximity of Locations 3 and 4 of the monitoring program, sampling boundaries for those locations are smaller and sampling duration is reduced accordingly to 15 minutes. In addition, Location 2 was blocked by a large tree that had fallen across the middle of the sampling area prohibiting sample collection on the upper reach. of the sampling _area. As a result, sampljng at__this. location was reduced to 15 minutes. Electrofishing was conducted such that the first "run" at each location was in a downstream direction through the middle of the shocking zone. The second "run" was conducted in an upstream direction, adjacent to the first "run" and as close to the bank as water depth allowed. The third "run", if necessary, was made in a downstream direction outside of, but adjacent to, the two previous runs (Figure 2-2). Sampling was restricted to the hours between one-half hour after sunrise to one-half hour before sunset. 2.1.2 SEINING Shoreline seining was used as a second collection method at each sampling location. Seine samples were collected on 5 August 2008. Seine dimensions were 25 ft by 4 ft of 3/16- inch ace mesh, with a 4-ft by 4-ft bag of 3/16-inch ace mesh. Two seine hauls were made at each station (Figure 2-1). Each haul was made in a upstream direction covering approximately 15 meters of shoreline, with the second haul being conducted upstream of the first. An additional seine haul was made at location 4L. Seining was restricted to the hours commencing one-half hour after sunrise to one-half hour before sunset. 2.1.3 SAMPLE PROCESSING All state-listed fish (i.e., pallid shiner and river redhorse) were identified and enumerated. River redhorse specimens were measured for total length (mm) and weighed (g) individually. Rn 3 R-;A-"J AT-1- QM14- •tnte.lleto•l •nerlee l.voeHon•.. Rrni~u~nnHan MueloarVtn tato.icto Q-ori*o Innfdfltion 2.1.4 WATER QUALITY MEASUREMENTS Three physicochemical parameters (temperature, dissolved oxygen [DO], and pH) were measured in conjunction with the sampling program. These data were collected prior to each sampling effort. Additionally, conductivity was measured prior to each electrofishing collection. All of the physicochemical measurements were taken at mid-depth in the water column. Temperature (°C), dissolved oxygen (ppm), and conductivity (gmhos) were measured using an YSI Model 85 handheld oxygen, conductivity, salinity, and temperature meter.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rockfish (Sebastes) That Are Evolutionarily Isolated Are Also
    Biological Conservation 142 (2009) 1787–1796 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Rockfish (Sebastes) that are evolutionarily isolated are also large, morphologically distinctive and vulnerable to overfishing Karen Magnuson-Ford a,b, Travis Ingram c, David W. Redding a,b, Arne Ø. Mooers a,b,* a Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby BC, Canada V5A 1S6 b IRMACS, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby BC, Canada V5A 1S6 c Department of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, #2370-6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Z4 article info abstract Article history: In an age of triage, we must prioritize species for conservation effort. Species more isolated on the tree of Received 23 September 2008 life are candidates for increased attention. The rockfish genus Sebastes is speciose (>100 spp.), morpho- Received in revised form 10 March 2009 logically and ecologically diverse and many species are heavily fished. We used a complete Sebastes phy- Accepted 18 March 2009 logeny to calculate a measure of evolutionary isolation for each species and compared this to their Available online 22 April 2009 morphology and imperilment. We found that evolutionarily isolated species in the northeast Pacific are both larger-bodied and, independent of body size, morphologically more distinctive. We examined Keywords: extinction risk within rockfish using a compound measure of each species’ intrinsic vulnerability to Phylogenetic diversity overfishing and categorizing species as commercially fished or not. Evolutionarily isolated species in Extinction risk Conservation priorities the northeast Pacific are more likely to be fished, and, due to their larger sizes and to life history traits Body size such as long lifespan and slow maturation rate, they are also intrinsically more vulnerable to overfishing.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Status of Quillback Rockfish Sebastes( Maliger) in U.S
    Agenda Item G.5 Supplemental REVISED Attachment 12 June 2021 DRAFT Status of quillback rockfish Sebastes( maliger) in U.S. waters off the coast of Washington in 2021 using catch and length data by Brian J. Langseth1 Chantel R. Wetzel1 Jason M. Cope1 Tien-Shui Tsou2 Lisa K. Hillier2 1Northwest Fisheries Science Center, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, Washington 98112 2Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 600 Capital Way North, Olympia, Washington 98501 June 2021 © Pacific Fisheries Management Council, 2021 Correct citation for this publication: Langseth, B.J., C.R. Wetzel, J.M. Cope, T.S. Tsou, L.K. Hillier. 2021. DRAFT Status of quillback rockfish (Sebastes maliger) in U.S. waters off the coast of Washington in 2021 using catch and length data. Pacific Fisheries Management Council, Portland, Oregon. 111 p. Contents Disclaimer i 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Basic Information . 1 1.2 Life History . 1 1.3 Historical and Current Fishery Information . 2 1.4 Summary of Management History and Performance . 2 2 Data 3 2.1 Fishery-Dependent Data . 3 2.1.1 Commercial Fishery . 3 2.1.2 Recreational / Sport Fishery . 5 2.2 Fishery-Independent Data . 6 2.3 Biological Data . 6 2.3.1 Natural Mortality . 6 2.3.2 Maturation and Fecundity . 7 2.3.3 Length-Weight Relationship . 7 2.3.4 Growth (Length-at-Age) . 8 3 Assessment Model 8 3.1 Summary of Previous Assessments . 8 3.1.1 Bridging Analysis . 8 3.2 Model Structure and Assumptions .
    [Show full text]
  • Quillback Carpiodes Cyprinus
    Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Quillback Carpiodes cyprinus Contributors (2005): Scott D. Lamprecht and Jason Bettinger [SCDNR] Editors (2013): Scott D. Lamprecht and Mark C. Scott (SCDNR) DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Description The Quillback is a member of the family Catostomidae, which is represented by 8 genera and 25 species in the mid-Atlantic region (Rohde et al. 1994). This family is characterized by soft-rayed fins, a mouth located on the underside of the head, thick fleshy distensible lips, and paired fins attached low on the body (Rohde et al. 1994). Current taxonomic and genetic work indicates that Atlantic Slope Quillback-type fish that are found in South Carolina may represent an undescribed species. Quillback are high bodied, laterally compressed fish that range in length up to 500 mm (19.5 in.) (W. Starnes, pers. comm.). They have a long, falcate dorsal fin with 23 to 30 rays, a small conical head, a silver to golden body, large conspicuous scales about twice as high as wide, and a lateral line that runs the length of the body. Quillback lack mouth barbels as well as dorsal and anal fin spines. The Quillback’s first long dorsal ray does not usually reach the full length of the dorsal fin base, while the first dorsal ray of the similar Highfin Carpsucker typically is as long as the fin (Rohde et al. 1994; Jenkins and Burkhead 1994). Quillback feed on insect larvae and other benthic organisms. They are spring spawners that can attain an age of at least 11 years (Jenkins and Burkhead 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Relationships Between Six Rare Minnesota Mussels and Their Host Fishes
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Final Report - Hove and Kapuscinski Division of Ecological Services Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Ecological relationships between six rare Minnesota mussels and their host fishes Abstract Of 297 freshwater mussel species living in North America, 213 are either endangered, threatened, or of special concern. The identification of fish hosts is listed as an urgent research objective in the National Strategy for Freshwater Mussel Conservation. Suitable hosts were determined by artificially infesting various fishes and amphibians with glochidia from one of six mussel species. A fish was considered a suitable host when larval metamorphosis to the juvenile stage was observed. Although twenty-five fish species and mudpuppy were exposed to spectaclecase glochidia, none of the species tested facilitated glochidial metamorphosis. Three-fold shell growth was observed on pistolgrip juveniles collected from yellow and brown bullheads. Transformation of ellipse glochidia was observed in mottled sculpin, four darters, and brook stickleback. Metamorphosis of butterfly glochidia was not observed. Blackside darter and logperch were found to be suitable hosts for snuffbox. Purple wartyback glochidia transformed on four catfishes. We used microscopy and initiated molecular techniques to identify a subsample of approximately 5000 juvenile mussels collected from freshwater drum naturally infested with glochidia. Light microscopes and a scanning electron microscope were used to study the juvenile mussels and glochidia from mussels whose length is less than 100 µm. Species identification was limited to subfamily using light microscopes. Analysis of shell surface sculpture, shell outline, and shell height from scanning electron micrographs suggest the subsample of juveniles are either Truncilla truncata or T.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Fishes IDENTIFICATION GUIDE
    Pennsylvania Fishes IDENTIFICATION GUIDE Editor’s Note: During 2018, Pennsylvania Angler & the status of fishes in or introduced into Pennsylvania’s Boater magazine will feature select common fishes of major watersheds. Pennsylvania in each issue, providing scientific names and The table below denotes any known occurrence. WATERSHEDS SPECIES STATUS E O G P S D Freshwater Eels (Family Anguillidae) American Eel (Anguilla rostrata) N N N N Species Status Herrings (Family Clupeidae) EN = Endangered Blueback Herring (Alosa aestivalis) N TH = Threatened Skipjack Herring (Alosa chrysochloris) DL N Hickory Shad (Alosa mediocris) EN N C = Candidate Alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) I N N American Shad (Alosa sapidissima) N N EX = Believed extirpated Atlantic Menhaden (Brevoortia tyrannus) N DL = Delisted (removed from the Gizzard Shad (Dorosoma cepedianum) N N N N endangered, threatened or candidate species list due to significant Suckers (Family Catostomidae) expansion of range and abundance) River Carpsucker (Carpiodes carpio) N Quillback (Carpiodes cyprinus) N N N N Highfin Carpsucker (Carpiodes velifer) EX N Watersheds Longnose Sucker (Catostomus catostomus) EN N N White Sucker (Catostomus commersonii) N N N N N N E = Lake Erie Blue Sucker (Cycleptus elongatus) EX N O = Ohio River Eastern Creek Chubsucker (Erimyzon oblongus) N N N Lake Chubsucker (Erimyzon sucetta) EX N G = Genesee River Northern Hogsucker (Hypentelium nigricans) N N N N N X Smallmouth Buffalo (Ictiobus bubalus) DL N N P = Potomac River Bigmouth Buffalo (Ictiobus cyprinellus)
    [Show full text]
  • ES Teacher Packet.Indd
    PROCESS OF EXTINCTION When we envision the natural environment of the Currently, the world is facing another mass extinction. past, one thing that may come to mind are vast herds However, as opposed to the previous five events, and flocks of a great diversity of animals. In our this extinction is not caused by natural, catastrophic modern world, many of these herds and flocks have changes in environmental conditions. This current been greatly diminished. Hundreds of species of both loss of biodiversity across the globe is due to one plants and animals have become extinct. Why? species — humans. Wildlife, including plants, must now compete with the expanding human population Extinction is a natural process. A species that cannot for basic needs (air, water, food, shelter and space). adapt to changing environmental conditions and/or Human activity has had far-reaching effects on the competition will not survive to reproduce. Eventually world’s ecosystems and the species that depend on the entire species dies out. These extinctions may them, including our own species. happen to only a few species or on a very large scale. Large scale extinctions, in which at least 65 percent of existing species become extinct over a geologically • The population of the planet is now growing by short period of time, are called “mass extinctions” 2.3 people per second (U.S. Census Bureau). (Leakey, 1995). Mass extinctions have occurred five • In mid-2006, world population was estimated to times over the history of life on earth; the first one be 6,555,000,000, with a rate of natural increase occurred approximately 440 million years ago and the of 1.2%.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes-Of-The-Salish-Sea-Pp18.Pdf
    NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 18 Fishes of the Salish Sea: a compilation and distributional analysis Theodore W. Pietsch James W. Orr September 2015 U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Professional Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce Papers NMFS National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D. Sullivan Scientifi c Editor Administrator Richard Langton National Marine Fisheries Service National Marine Northeast Fisheries Science Center Fisheries Service Maine Field Station Eileen Sobeck 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 1 Assistant Administrator Orono, Maine 04473 for Fisheries Associate Editor Kathryn Dennis National Marine Fisheries Service Offi ce of Science and Technology Fisheries Research and Monitoring Division 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 178 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 Managing Editor Shelley Arenas National Marine Fisheries Service Scientifi c Publications Offi ce 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 Editorial Committee Ann C. Matarese National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Orr National Marine Fisheries Service - The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS (ISSN 1931-4590) series is published by the Scientifi c Publications Offi ce, National Marine Fisheries Service, The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series carries peer-reviewed, lengthy original NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, fl ora and fauna studies, and data- Seattle, WA 98115. intensive reports on investigations in fi shery science, engineering, and economics. The Secretary of Commerce has Copies of the NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series are available free in limited determined that the publication of numbers to government agencies, both federal and state. They are also available in this series is necessary in the transac- exchange for other scientifi c and technical publications in the marine sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana
    Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings Volume 1 Number 61 2021 Article 3 March 2021 Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana Michael H. Doosey University of New Orelans, [email protected] Henry L. Bart Jr. Tulane University, [email protected] Kyle R. Piller Southeastern Louisiana Univeristy, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Biodiversity Commons Recommended Citation Doosey, Michael H.; Bart, Henry L. Jr.; and Piller, Kyle R. (2021) "Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana," Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings: No. 61. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings/vol1/iss61/3 This Original Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by Volunteer, Open Access, Library Journals (VOL Journals), published in partnership with The University of Tennessee (UT) University Libraries. This article has been accepted for inclusion in Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings by an authorized editor. For more information, please visit https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings. Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana Abstract Since the publication of Freshwater Fishes of Louisiana (Douglas, 1974) and a revised checklist (Douglas and Jordan, 2002), much has changed regarding knowledge of inland fishes in the state. An updated reference on Louisiana’s inland and coastal fishes is long overdue. Inland waters of Louisiana are home to at least 224 species (165 primarily freshwater, 28 primarily marine, and 31 euryhaline or diadromous) in 45 families. This checklist is based on a compilation of fish collections records in Louisiana from 19 data providers in the Fishnet2 network (www.fishnet2.net).
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Fish Taxonomic Key 2017 Edition
    Minnesota Fish Taxonomic Key 2017 Edition Pictures from – NANFA (2017) Warren Lamb Aquatic Biology Program Bemidji State University Bemidji, MN 56601 Introduction Minnesota’s landscape is maze of lakes and river that are home to a recorded total of 163 species of fish. This document is a complete and current dichotomous taxonomic key of the Minnesota fishes. This key was based on the 1972 “Northern Fishes” key (Eddy 1972), and updated based on Dr. Jay Hatch’s article “Minnesota Fishes: Just How Many Are There?” (Hatch 2016). Any new species or family additions were also referenced to the 7th edition of the American Fisheries society “Names of North American Fishes” (Page et al. 2013) to assess whether a fish species is currently recognized by the scientific community. Identifying characteristics for new additions were compared to those found in Page and Burr (2011). In total five species and one family have been added to the taxonomic key, while three have been removed since the last publication. Species pictures within the keys have been provide from either Bemidji State University Ichthyology Students or North American Native Fish Association (NANFA). My hope is that this document will offer an accurate and simple key so anyone can identify the fish they may encounter in Minnesota. Warren Lamb – 2017 Pictures from – NANFA (2017) References Eddy, S. and J. C. Underhill. 1974. Northern Fishes. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. 414 pp. Hatch, J. 2015. Minnesota fishes: just how many are there anyway? American Currents 40:10-21. Page, L. M. and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes of North America North of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Kansas Fishes
    CHECKLIST OF KANSAS FISHES From "A Checklist of the Vertebrate Animals of Kansas", second edition, 1999, by George Potts, Joseph Collins and Kate Shaw (Species marked with an asterisk * are extirpated from the wild in Kansas.) 142 Species REFERENCE: Fishes in Kansas, 2nd edition, 1995 By Frank Cross and Joseph Collins, KU Press Order of Lampreys (Petromyzontiformes) Family Petromyzontidae Chestnut Lamprey - Ichthyomyzon castaneus Order of Sturgeons and Paddlefish (Acipenseriformes) Family Acipenseridae Lake Sturgeon - Acipenser fulvescens Pallid Sturgeon - Scaphirhynchus albus Shovelnose Sturgeon - Scaphirhynchus platorynchus Family Polyodontidae Paddlefish - Polyodon spathula Order of Gars (Semionotiformes) Family Lepisosteidae Spotted Gar - Lepisosteus oculatus Longnose Gar - Lepisosteus osseus Shortnose Gar - Lepisosteus platostomus Order of Bowfins (Amiiformes) Family Amiidae Bowfin - Amia calva Order of Bony-tongued fishes (Osteoglossiformes) Family Hiodontidae Goldeye - Hiodon alosoides * Mooneye - Hiodon tergisus Order of Eels (Anguilliformes) Family Anguillidae American Eel - Anguilla rostrata Order of Herrings (Clupeiformes) Family Clupeidae Skipjack Herring - Alosa chrysochloris Gizzard Shad - Dorosoma cepedianum Threadfin Shad - Dorosoma petenense Page 1 of 5 Order of Carp-like fishes (Cypriniformes) Family Cyprinidae Central Stoneroller - Campostoma anomalum Goldfish - Carassius auratus Grass Carp - Ctenopharyngodon idella Bluntface Shiner - Cyprinella camura Red Shiner - Cyprinella lutrensis Spotfin Shiner - Cyprinella spiloptera
    [Show full text]
  • Sucker Species (Catostomidae) Diversity in North Carolina
    Sucker Species (Catostomidae) Diversity in North Carolina There are 29 species of suckers including five undescribed species inhabiting North Carolina waters (Tracy et al. 2020; Tracy et al. 2021; Table 1). You might have heard fishermen calling them Mullets, Redhorses, Hoovers, Creek Trout, Razor Back, or many more colloquial names. But each species has an American Fisheries Society-accepted common name (Page et al. 2013) and a scientific (Latin) name (Table 1; Appendix 1).Twelve species are considered imperiled in North Carolina (Table 2; NCAC 2017; NCNHP 2020; NCWRC 2017). Table 1. Species of suckers found in North Carolina. Common names enclosed within tick marks (“) are scientifically undescribed species. Scientific Name/ Scientific Name/ American Fisheries Society Accepted Common Name American Fisheries Society Accepted Common Name Carpiodes carpio - River Carpsucker Moxostoma breviceps - Smallmouth Redhorse Carpiodes cyprinus - Quillback Moxostoma carinatum - River Redhorse Carpiodes sp. "Atlantic" Highfin Carpsucker Moxostoma cervinum - Blacktip Jumprock Carpiodes sp. "Carolina" Quillback Moxostoma collapsum - Notchlip Redhorse Catostomus commersonii - White Sucker Moxostoma duquesnei - Black Redhorse Erimyzon oblongus - Eastern Creek Chubsucker Moxostoma erythrurum - Golden Redhorse Erimyzon sucetta - Lake Chubsucker Moxostoma macrolepidotum - Shorthead Redhorse Hypentelium nigricans - Northern Hog Sucker Moxostoma pappillosum - V-lip Redhorse Hypentelium roanokense - Roanoke Hog Sucker Moxostoma robustum - Robust Redhorse Ictiobus bubalus - Smallmouth Buffalo Moxostoma rupiscartes - Striped Jumprock Ictiobus cyprinellus - Bigmouth Buffalo Moxostoma sp. "Brassy" Jumprock Ictiobus niger - Black Buffalo Moxostoma sp. "Carolina" Redhorse Minytrema melanops - Spotted Sucker Moxostoma sp. "Sicklefin" Redhorse Moxostoma anisurum - Silver Redhorse Thoburnia hamiltoni – Rustyside Sucker Moxostoma ariommum - Bigeye Jumprock Table 2. Imperiled species of suckers in North Carolina (NCAC 2017, NCNHP 2020, and NCWRC 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the Dakotas
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2020 Fishes of the Dakotas Kathryn Schlafke South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Schlafke, Kathryn, "Fishes of the Dakotas" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3942. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/3942 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FISHES OF THE DAKOTAS BY KATHRYN SCHLAFKE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science Major in Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Specialization in Fisheries Science South Dakota State University 2020 ii THESIS ACCEPTANCE PAGE Kathryn Schlafke This thesis is approved as a creditable and independent investigation by a candidate for the master’s degree and is acceptable for meeting the thesis requirements for this degree. Acceptance of this does not imply that the conclusions reached by the candidate are necessarily the conclusions of the major department. Brian Graeb, Ph.D. Advisor Date Michele R. Dudash Department Head Date Dean, Graduate School Date iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank my advisors throughout this project, Dr. Katie Bertrand and Dr. Brian Graeb for giving me the opportunity to work towards a graduate degree at South Dakota State University.
    [Show full text]