DOCSLIB.ORG

Title, Table of Contents2008.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Title, Table of Contents2008.Indd 27 Additional Distributional Records of the Ouachita Mountain Crayfish,Procambarus tenuis (Decapoda: Cambaridae), in Arkansas and Oklahoma, with Notes on Ecology and Natural History Henry W. Robison Department of Biological Sciences, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, Arkansas 71754-9354 Chris T. McAllister RapidWrite, 102 Brown Street, Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas 71913-7063 The Ouachita Mountain crayfish Procambarus( tenuis) is an uncommon endemic spe- cies known from several localities in the Ouachita Mountain Province of four counties (Howard, Montgomery, Polk, and Scott) of western Arkansas and three counties (LeFlore, Pittsburg, and Pushmataha) of eastern Oklahoma. Populations of P. tenuis are typically small. They inhabit small first and second order clear streams and springs where they hide and burrow under rocks. Forty-eight P. tenuis were collected during our 1.5 year study period from 19 of 93 (20.4%) localities. First form males were captured in May and June. We document several new localities for P. tenuis as well as providing a summa- tion of all known localities for the species. Additional aspects of the biology of P. tenuis are discussed. We recommend a conservation status of vulnerable for P. tenuis. © 2008 Oklahoma Academy of Science. INTRODUCTION that specimens from Polk County, Arkan- sas, were examined and noted additional The Ouachita Mountain crayfish (Procam- specimens from Montgomery County in barus tenuis) was originally described by Arkansas. In addition, Reimer (1968) cited Hobbs (1950) from specimens collected in P. tenuis only briefly and noted its distribu- 1934 by Charles E. Burt at two localities in tion was the “Ouachita Mountain Province the headwaters of the Little River system in of Oklahoma and Arkansas.” Jones and Oklahoma and Arkansas (Ouachita Moun- Bergey (2007) reported collections of 28 P. tains). Voucher specimens were deposited in tenuis from tributaries of the upper Kiamichi the collection of the United States National River, all sites within the known range. Museum, Smithsonian Institution (USNM). Unfortunately, we know little about the Since the description, few collections of this distributional limits of P. tenuis and even species have been made and the species is less about natural history and ecological apparently rare and its current distribution aspects including its reproductive biology, is poorly known (Jones and Bergey 2007). habitat requirements, and general biology. Indeed, populations of P. tenuis are consid- Our study is a compilation of information ered by the Natural Heritage Inventory to on the geographic distribution, life history be imperiled (S2 rank) in Arkansas, endan- aspects, and conservation status of Procam- gered (S1 rank) in Oklahoma, and imper- barus tenuis. iled/vulnerable (G2-G3 rank) in rounded Specific objectives of the study were (1) global status (NatureServe 2008; E. A. to determine the relative abundance and Bergey “personal communication”). In his precise distributional limits of the range unpublished thesis, Reimer (1963) reported of Procambarus tenuis; (2) to gather data on Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 88: pp 27-34 (2008) 28 H. W. ROBISON and C. T. McALLISTER life history aspects of this crayfish species several localities in the Ouachita Mountains. including information on habitat, reproduc- Often, P. tenuis was the only crayfish spe- tive period, and any other biological data cies living in the smaller spring-fed, first available; (3) to provide data on ecological order and second order streams. However, requirements of P. tenuis; and (4) to assess other crayfishes collected where P. tenuis the current status of this crayfish species was found included the redspotted stream based on distributional data collected. crayfish (Orconectes acares), the Little River creek crayfish (O. leptogonopodus), the Mena MATERIALS and METHODS crayfish (O. menae), and the western painted crayfish (O. palmeri longimanus). Field work was conducted from October 2006 through June 2008. Much of it occurred DISCUSSION during the fall, spring, and summer to utilize optimal field environmental condi- Overview of crayfishes tions. A total of 93 collections were made Freshwater crayfish are a highly diverse in Montgomery, Polk, and Scott counties, group of decapod crustaceans with over 540 Arkansas, and LeFlore County, Oklahoma. species currently described (Crandall and A variety of collecting methods were used Buhay 2008). In North America alone, 363 including the use of aquatic dipnets, baited native crayfish or nearly two-thirds of the and unbaited crayfish traps, and seines. One world’s crayfish fauna inhabit the continent to two specimens from each collecting site (Butler et al 2003; Taylor et al 2007). Crayfish were preserved in 60% isopropyl alcohol for play important roles in ecosystems as preda- later study. Voucher specimens were depos- tors, bioprocessors of vegetation and carrion, ited in the Southern Arkansas University and serve as an important food resource for (SAU) Invertebrate Collection, Magnolia, fishes and numerous other terrestrial and Arkansas, and the Brigham Young Univer- aquatic organisms (Hobbs 1993; Butler et sity (BYU) crayfish collection. In addition al 2003; DiStefano 2005). Crayfish are true to collections made during this survey, omnivores and occupy many trophic roles museum specimens of P. tenuis housed in (Adams 2006). the USNM and SAU were studied to docu- Crayfish exhibit four main habit types: ment the overall geographic distribution of primary burrowers (those crayfish who this species. All previous literature dealing spend their entire life cycle in burrows); with this crayfish species was also consulted stream-dwellers; pond/lake/large river and distributional information was utilized dwellers (including secondary burrowers when deemed accurate. who do require connectivity of burrows with freshwater); and stygobitic species RESULTS (obligate cave-dwellers) (Bouchard and Robison 1980; Crandall and Buhay 2008). Of these collections, 48 specimens from 19 Crayfish inhabiting each of these habitats of 93 (20.4%) localities were taken during occur in Arkansas and Oklahoma. this study (see Appendix). However, none of the P. tenuis were collected from Scott Recognition characters of P. tenuis County, Arkansas, sites re-visited where The name “tenuis” refers to the slender historical collections were previously or compressed carapace of this crayfish spe- known. First form males were collected in cies. When seen from above, the carapace May and June. This crayfish was found in of P. tenuis is noticeably more slender and small first and second order streams, living strongly compressed than other sympatric primarily beneath rocks. It was also found crayfish species. The rostrum of P. tenuis in springs and spring run-off streams in does not possess lateral spines nor bran- Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 88: pp 27-34 (2008) OUACHITA MOUNTAIN CRAYFISH IN ARKANSAS IN OKLAHOMA 29 chiostegal spines and the areola is narrow details were unknown to him. The only note with only two punctuations in the narrowest concerning habitat made in the description part. The antennal scale is widest anterior to was in the type locality description which the mid-length. The first pleopod terminates mentioned “in spring at base of mountains.” in three processes with the mesial process This shallow burrowing species has been projecting caudad at nearly a 90° angle with collected from under rocks in clear cold the axis of the shaft. The basic coloration of streams, where it is apparently quite active the body is light tan with blackish speck- even in very cold water (Williams, 1954). les. Robison (2000) collected P. tenuis from simple burrows beneath rocks in a spring- Taxonomic Remarks fed runoff area in Arkansas and in spring- Hobbs (1950) stated that P. tenuis was outflows under rocks in Oklahoma. This more closely allied to the White River cray- species was also taken from beneath rocks fish (Procambarus acutus) morphologically in shallow pool margins in first and second than to any other described species. Pend- order streams. Jones (2004: 35) noted that ing on-going DNA analyses of P. tenuis being “P. tenuis was not captured in any streams conducted by K. Crandall at BYU, no addi- that did not harbor O. saxatilis.” However, tional systematic work has been published other museum collections do not support on this species. this generalization. In addition, Jones and Bergey (2007) provided detailed descrip- Type Locality tions of streams with P. tenuis in the upper The type locality of P. tenuis was de- Kiamichi River in Oklahoma. scribed by Hobbs (1950) as “six miles east of Page and just west of the Oklahoma state Distribution line, LeFlore County, Oklahoma; in a spring The range of P. tenuis was given as the at base of mountains, a tributary of the Little Arkansas, Ouachita, and Red River basins River.” The holotype is USNM 90390 col- of eastern Oklahoma and western Arkansas lected on June 3, 1934 by Charles E. Burt. (Hobbs 1989). Prior to Hobbs (1989), the Ouachita Mountain crayfish was known Relative Abundance from only three localities in Montgom- Hobbs (1950) described P. tenuis from ery (Ouachita River drainage) and Polk 34 specimens taken from only two locali- (Ouachita River drainage) counties, Arkan- ties. Jones and Bergey (2007) found 29 P. sas, and one locality in LeFlore County (Red tenuis between July 2002 and May 2003, 13 River drainage), Oklahoma, the type local- from riffles and 15 from pools. During our ity. Reimer (1963) mentioned he examined field study, 48 specimens of P. tenuis were specimens from Polk County at a site in the collected from 19 different sites of 93 sites Ouachita River on US 71. He also reported (20.4%) sampled. Collections ranged from an additional record from Montgomery one to 19 specimens. The largest single col- County collected in 1948 (see Appendix; lection on record was 23 paratypes collected Hobbs 1950). Later, Robison (2000) found by C. E. Burt on 3 June 1934 (Hobbs 1950; see this crayfish at only four localities, two in Appendix). Typically, few (1-5) specimens Polk County, Arkansas, and two in LeFlore were collected because they were locally County, Oklahoma (Appendix).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Decapoda: Cambaridae) of Arkansas Henry W
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 71 Article 9 2017 An Annotated Checklist of the Crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae) of Arkansas Henry W. Robison Retired, [email protected] Keith A. Crandall George Washington University, [email protected] Chris T. McAllister Eastern Oklahoma State College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Robison, Henry W.; Crandall, Keith A.; and McAllister, Chris T. (2017) "An Annotated Checklist of the Crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae) of Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 71 , Article 9. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol71/iss1/9 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. An Annotated Checklist of the Crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae) of Arkansas Cover Page Footnote Our deepest thanks go to HWR’s numerous former SAU students who traveled with him in search of crayfishes on many fieldtrips throughout Arkansas from 1971 to 2008. Personnel especially integral to this study were C.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brazos Dwarf Crayfish (Cambarellus Texanus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Brazos Dwarf Crayfish (Cambarellus texanus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, April 2014 Revised, October 2016 Web Version, 11/17/2017 Photo: © Keith A. Crandall. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike License. Available: http://tolweb.org/Cambarellus_(Pandicambarus)_texanus. (October 2016). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Fetzner (2016): “East of the Lavaca River and Bay to the Brazos River drainage system, Texas.” Status in the United States From Alvarez et al. (2010): “This species was first found in a ditch near Bay City in Matagorda County, Texas. It has since been found in the Colorado River, Fort Bend County, and Waller County. It is thought that the range is bound by the Lavaca River and Bay on the west, though the northward and eastward range limits are not known (Albaugh and Black 1973).” “This species has been collected from 31 sites and is believed to be common at most sites (D. Johnson pers. comm. 2009).” 1 Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced outside of its native range in the United States. Remarks From NatureServe (2015): “It is found only in Texas in a small range near the central Texas coast (Johnson and Johnson, 2008). It has a larger range than Cambarellus ninae, but does occur in an area that is experiencing urban growth; however populations appear stable and there is no evidence of decline.” 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Freshwater Crayfish of Massachusetts: the Genus Procambarus ______
    Phylogenetic Analysis of Freshwater Crayfish of Massachusetts: The genus Procambarus ______________________________________________ A Major Qualifying Project Submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by ___________________________________ Dilbar Ibrasheva Approved by: ___________________________________ Professor Michael A. Buckholt Professor Lauren Mathews January 13, 2011 Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 The Species Concept ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Phylogeography and Population Genetics .................................................................................... 8 3 Materials and Methods ....................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Samples and DNA Extraction
    [Show full text]
  • First Records of Alien Crayfish of the Procambarus Acutus Species Complex in Belgium
    BioInvasions Records (2020) Volume 9, Issue 3: 562–569 CORRECTED PROOF Rapid Communication First records of alien crayfish of the Procambarus acutus species complex in Belgium Kevin Scheers1,2,*,+, Pieter Boets3,4,+, Thomas Abeel5 and Tom Van den Neucker2,6 1Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Havenlaan 88 bus 73, 1000 Brussels, Belgium 2Biodiversity Inventory for Conservation NPO (BINCO), Walmersumstraat 44, 3380 Glabbeek, Belgium 3Provincial Centre of Environmental Research, Godshuizenlaan 95, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 4Ghent University, Department of Animal Science and Aquatic Ecology, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 5Odisee Campus Sint-Niklaas, Aqua-ERF, Hospitaalstraat 23, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium 6University of Antwerp, Department of Biology, Ecosystem Management Research Group, Universiteitsplein 1C, 2160 Wilrijk, Belgium + both authors contributed equally Author e-mails: [email protected] (KS), [email protected] (PB), [email protected] (TA) , [email protected] (TVDN) *Corresponding author Citation: Scheers K, Boets P, Abeel T, Van den Neucker T (2020) First records of Abstract alien crayfish of the Procambarus acutus species complex in Belgium. BioInvasions We present the first Belgian records of potentially invasive alien crayfish of the Records 9(3): 562–569, https://doi.org/10. Procambarus acutus species complex, including the first confirmed record of P. acutus 3391/bir.2020.9.3.11 acutus. The species complex was observed at four different sites in three provinces Received: 5 February 2020 in the north of the country. Only at one site the presence of a form I male specimen Accepted: 14 May 2020 made identification to species level possible, based on gonopod morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for the Evolutionary Ecology of Crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae)
    SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS AND TRAIT- ENVIRONMENT CORRELATIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY OF CRAYFISH (DECAPODA: CAMBARIDAE) By REID LANDEN MOREHOUSE Bachelor of Science in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 2006 Master of Science in Zoology Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 2010 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July, 2014 SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS AND TRAIT- ENVIRONMENT CORRELATIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY OF CRAYFISH (DECAPODA: CAMBARIDAE) Dissertation Approved: Dr. Michael Tobler Dissertation Adviser Dr. Punidan Jeyasingh Dr. Monica Papeş Dr. Andrew Dzialowski Dr. Shannon Brewer ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research would not have been possible without the advice, guidance, counseling and help from my friends and family. First, I am in great debt to my advisor, Dr. Michi Tobler. Without your never ending help and desire to push me to my limits, these projects would not have been possible. Your attitude towards me and my research allowed me to really dive right in without feeling pressured and stressed. The freedom and trust you gave me to run my own research allowed me to grow as an individual more than I ever would have thought. I could not have asked for a better advisor and friend. Next, I thank my committee members: Dr. Puni Jeyasingh, Dr. Andrew Dzialowski, Dr. Mona Papeş, and Dr. Shannon Brewer, for all of your faith and confidence in my research and myself. Your jokes, even at my expense, and overall general attitudes really help me keep a level head and push through the rough times.
    [Show full text]
  • White River Crayfish Procambarusprocambarus Acutus Aacutushemimysis Acutus Acutus Anomala
    White River Crayfish www.seagrant.psu.edu ProcambarusProcambarus acutus aacutusHemimysis acutus acutus anomala The white river crayfish, also called the white river crawfish and the eastern white river crayfish, is often confused with its southern counterpart, the southern white river crayfish (Procambarus zonangulus). The eastern white river crayfish occurs naturally in the United States and is cultured eastwards from Lousiana to the Atlantic coast northward to Maine, Photo courtesy of Tony Palacios, but has established select non-native populations in locations throughout the East Coast iNaturalist.org, EOL. and in California. Species Description Adult white river crayfish are usually a dark burgundy red but can range in color from pinkish tan to brownish olive with a black “V-shaped” stripe on the abdomen. The carapace is rough and granular and is separated in the middle by a narrow space called the areola. Juveniles are gray with dark spots scattered over the carapace. The claws are long and narrow, delicate in appearance, and have small dark tubercles. This species reaches about 6-13 cm (2.5-5 in) in length. The white river crayfish is nearly impossible to distinguish from the southern white river crayfish without looking at the reproductive structures of a breeding male. It is also confused with the red swamp crayfish (P. clarkii), which have an areola that is straight, or often invisible, and a black “V-shaped” stripe on the abdomen. The juveniles are also typically plain or striped on the carapace instead of spotted. White river crayfish can also be found in streams and ditches with a stronger flow than what is preferred by the red swamp crayfish.
    [Show full text]
  • White River Crayfish (Procambarus Acutus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service White River Crayfish (Procambarus acutus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, July 2015 Photo: © Keith A. Crandall. Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Available: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/. 1 Native Range, and Status in the United States Native Range From Benson (2015): “Southern Atlantic coast drainage from Georgia to Maine and from the Florida panhandle to Mexico; central Mississippi Valley to the upper Great Lakes drainages.” Status in the United States From Crandall (2010): “This species is known from the coastal plain and piedmont from Maine to Georgia, and from the Florida panhandle to Texas, and Minnesota to Ohio (Ghedotti 1998, Loughman 2007). Furthermore, this species has been introduced to many areas of the US, including California, Maine and Kentucky (Loughman 2007).” “California - Introduced, Connecticut - Introduced, … Maine - Introduced, Maryland - Introduced, … Rhode Island - Introduced” Means of Introductions in the United States From Benson (2015): “Probable bait bucket or aquaculture introductions.” 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2015): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Protostomia Superphylum Ecdysozoa Phylum Arthropoda Subphylum Crustacea Class Malacostraca Subclass Eumalacostraca Superorder Eucarida Order Decapoda Suborder Pleocyemata Infraorder Astacidea Superfamily Astacoidea Family Cambaridae Subfamily Cambarinae Genus Procambarus Subgenus Procambarus (Ortmannicus) Species
    [Show full text]
  • CRAWFISH of MISSISSIPPI1 April 4, 2008 Family Cambaridae Hobbs
    CRAWFISH OF MISSISSIPPI1 April 4, 2008 Family Cambaridae Hobbs, 1942 Subfamily Cambarellinae Laguarda, 1961 Genus Cambarellus Ortmann, 1905 Subgenus Dirigicambarus Fitzpatrick, 1983 Cambarellus shufeldtii (Faxon, 1884)* - Cajun Dwarf Crayfish Subgenus Pandicambarus Fitzpatrick, 1983 Cambarellus diminutus Hobbs, 1945* - Least Crayfish Cambarellus lesliei Fitzpatrick and Laning, 1976* - Angular Dwarf Crayfish Cambarellus puer Hobbs, 1945 - Swamp Dwarf Crawfish Subfamily Cambarinae Hobbs, 1942 Genus Cambarus Erichson, 1846 Subgenus Depressicambarus Hobbs, 1969 Cambarus striatus Hay, 1902* - Ambiguous Crayfish Subgenus Lacunicambarus Hobbs, 1969 Cambarus diogenes Girard, 1852* - Devil Crayfish Cambarus sp., ref.: diogenes -UNDESCRIBED SPECIES Cambarus ludovicianus Faxon, 1885* - Painted Devil Crayfish Cambarus sp., ref.: ludovicianus - UNDESCRIBED SPECIES Subgenus Tubericambarus Jezerinac, 1993 Cambarus sp. A* - UNDESCRIBED SPECIES Genus Fallicambarus Hobbs, 1969 Subgenus Creaserinus Hobbs, 1973 Fallicambarus burrisi Fitzpatrick 1987* - Burrowing Bog Crayfish Fallicambarus sp., ref.: burrisi - UNDESCRIBED SPECIES Fallicambarus byersi (Hobbs, 1941)* - Lavender Burrowing Crayfish Fallicambarus danielae Hobbs, 1975* - Speckled Burrowing Crayfish Fallicambarus fodiens (Cottle, 1863)* - Digger Crayfish Fallicambarus gordoni Fitzpatrick 1987* - Camp Shelby Burrowing Crayfish Fallicambarus oryktes (Penn & Marlow, 1959)* - Flatwoods Digger Genus Faxonella Creaser, 1933 Faxonella clypeata (Hay, 1899)* - Ditch Fencing Crayfish Genus Hobbseus Fitzpatrick
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation
    CONSERVATION ecapod crustaceans in the families Astacidae, recreational and commercial bait fisheries, and serve as a Cambaridae, and Parastacidae, commonly known profitable and popular food resource. Crayfishes often make as crayfishes or crawfishes, are native inhabitants up a large proportion of the biomass produced in aquatic of freshwater ecosystems on every continent systems (Rabeni 1992; Griffith et al. 1994). In streams, sport except Africa and Antarctica. Although nearly worldwide fishes such as sunfishes and basses (family Centrarchidae) in distribution, crayfishes exhibit the highest diversity in may consume up to two-thirds of the annual production of North America north of Mexico with 338 recognized taxa crayfishes, and as such, crayfishes often comprise critical (308 species and 30 subspecies). Mirroring continental pat- food resources for these fishes (Probst et al. 1984; Roell and terns of freshwater fishes (Warren and Burr 1994) and fresh- Orth 1993). Crayfishes also contribute to the maintenance of water mussels (J. D. Williams et al. 1993), the southeastern food webs by processing vegetation and leaf litter (Huryn United States harbors the highest number of crayfish species. and Wallace 1987; Griffith et al. 1994), which increases avail- Crayfishes are a significant component of aquatic ecosys- ability of nutrients and organic matter to other organisms. tems. They facilitate important ecological processes, sustain In some rivers, bait fisheries for crayfishes constitute an Christopher A. Taylor and Melvin L. Warren, Jr. are cochairs of the Crayfish Subcommittee of the AFS Endangered Species Committee. They can be contacted at the Illinois Natural History Survey, Center for Biodiversity, 607 E. Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820, and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CRAYFISHES of NEW ENGLAND Denton W
    CRUSTACEA LI... SMITHSONIAN TTO RETUM TO W-119 * 16 August 1979 PROC. BIOL. SOC. WASH. 92(2), 1979, pp. 225-252 THE CRAYFISHES OF NEW ENGLAND Denton W. Crocker Abstract.—Ten crayfish species have been collected in New England. On the basis of the known limits of their geographic distribution elsewhere, 3 species, Procambarus (Scapulicambarus) clarkii (Girard), Orconectes rus- ticus (Girard), and O. obscurus (Hagen) have been introduced into the area by man. The time, place, and persons involved in the introductions are unknown. For 3 other species, O. limosus (Rafinesque), O. immunis (Ha- gen) and O. virilis (Hagen), though a natural entry into New England can be postulated (with greatest confidence for O. limosus), there probably has been considerable transfer inter- and intraregionally by man. Four species have distributions in New England which largely have been attained natu- rally: Cambarus (Cambarus) bartonii (Fabricius), C. (Puncticambarus) ro- bustus Girard, O. propinquus (Girard), and Procambarus (Ortmannicus) acutus acutus (Girard). Life history information is tabulated. A systematic list, figures, and distribution maps for each species are provided. The presence of crayfishes in New England, with species unidentified, has been recorded by historians and essayists (Williamson, 1832:165; Tho- reau, 1864:237). Information on the distributions of particular species began to accumulate with the recording of Astacus bartonii (now Cambarus bar- tonii) in Massachusetts by Gould (1841:330) and in Vermont by Thompson (1842:170). Hagen's monograph of 1870 adds to the distributional picture of C. bartonii in New England by including the Lake Champlain drainages in Vermont. He lists Maine, New Hampshire, Connecticut, and Rhode Island as being without crayfishes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Final Report Status and Genetics of Three Ouachita
    FINAL REPORT STATUS AND GENETICS OF THREE OUACHITA CRAYFISHES OF THE GENUS PROCAMBARUS by Henry W. Robison, Ph.D. Department of Biological Sciences Southern Arkansas University Magnolia, Arkansas 71754-9354 and Keith A. Crandall, Ph.D. Department of Integrative Biology Brigham University Provo, Utah 84602 Presented to The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission August 31, 2005 1 Introduction Three species of the crayfish genus Procambarus inhabit the Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas, namely, Procambarus reimeri, Procambarus tenuis, and the more wide-ranging species, Procambarus liberorum. Two of these crayfishes (Procambarus reimeri and Procambarus liberorum) are Arkansas endemics (Robison and Allen, 1995). Unfortunately, little is known of the genetics, distributional ranges of each of these species, conservation status of each, and/or their precise systematic relationships. In an effort to correct some of these problems, this study was undertaken to specifically look at these three species. Objectives The intention of this present study was to accurately portray the current conservation status. distribution, and genetics of three Ouachita Mountains crayfishes of the genus Procambarus. Specific objectives of the study were: 1. To establish a baseline distribution and status of three crayfishes: Procambarus tenuis, Procambarus reimeri, and Procambarus liberorum; 2. To employ genetic analyses to clarify the taxonomic status of these three crayfish species of the genus Procambarus relative to other Procambarus species in the area; and 3. To document the diversity and distribution of the crayfish fauna in areas of the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas. Methods and Materials Field work was conducted from March, 2005 through the spring and into July, 2005. The majority of collections were made during March, April, May and continued into early June, 2005 when wet conditions were optimal.
    [Show full text]