Usos Del Voseo Y Actitudes Hacia Él En El Castellano Hondureño

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Usos Del Voseo Y Actitudes Hacia Él En El Castellano Hondureño Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2016 El Tú no es de Nosotros, es de otros Países: Usos del Voseo y Actitudes hacia Él en el Castellano Hondureño Monika Estrada Andino Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Estrada Andino, Monika, "El Tú no es de Nosotros, es de otros Países: Usos del Voseo y Actitudes hacia Él en el Castellano Hondureño" (2016). LSU Master's Theses. 564. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/564 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EL TÚ NO ES DE NOSOTROS, ES DE OTROS PAÍSES: USOS DEL VOSEO Y ACTITUDES HACIA ÉL EN EL CASTELLANO HONDUREÑO A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures by Monika Estrada Andino B.A., Universität Leipzig, 2014 August 2016 This thesis is dedicated to my family, to my friend Missy Reid, and most of all to my husband Daniel. ii RECONOCIMIENTOS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Deseo expresar mis más sinceros agradecimientos a todas aquellas personas que me brindaron su colaboración y sus conocimientos durante la realización de esta investigación. En primer lugar quiero agradecerle a mi comité de tesis. Gracias a mi director de tesis, Dr. Rafael Orozco. Infinitas gracias a Dr. Dorian Dorado por sus consejos y correcciones y por motivarme siempre. Quiero agradecer a Dr. Laura Martins por abrir mi mente e inspirarme a pensar diferente. Es un honor haber podido aprender de Dr. Olga Scrivner de Indiana University. Su contribución en esta tesis permitió un análisis estadístico innovador en el campo de la sociolingüística variacionista. También le doy gracias especiales a mi amigo (casi Dr.) Kennet Carabante cuyos conocimientos de la estadística, grandioso talento para explicar e inmensa paciencia hicieron posible que yo pueda realizar los análisis probabilísticos necesarios para este estudio. Last but not least, quiero agradecer a los 152 participantes de mi estudio que se tomaron el tiempo para llenar el cuestionario y las personas que me ayudaron a encontrar estos participantes; especialmente mi familia en Tegucigalpa y José Daniel Estrada y Guillermo Londoño en Baton Rouge. iii TABLA DE CONTENIDOS RECONOCIMIENTOS…………………………………………………………………………..iii LISTA DE TABLAS……………………………………………………………………………..vi LISTA DE FIGURAS……………………………………………………...………………..….viii ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………………..……………….…ix RESUMEN ……………………………………………………………………….……………….x CAPÍTULO UNO: INTRODUCCIÓN……………………………………………………………1 1.1. El pronombre personal vos y sus formas verbales……………………………………2 1.2. Reseña diacrónica del voseo: historia y presente distribución ………………………..4 CAPÍTULO DOS: ANTECEDENTES……………………………………………………………8 2.1. Las comunidades bajo estudio ………………………………………………………..8 2.1.1. Honduras – un país plurilingüe …...…………….………………………..…8 2.1.2. Los capitalinos en Honduras………………..………………………………9 2.1.3. El castellano de Honduras…………………..……………………………..11 2.2. Presencia de hispanohablantes en los Estados Unidos ……………...………………12 2.2.1 El castellano hablado en Luisiana ….……………..……………………….13 2.2.2 Los hondureños en Luisiana ……………………………………………….15 2.3. Estudios sobre el voseo …………………………...…………………………………18 2.3.1 Estudios del voseo en comunidades del Cono Sur y otros países sudamericanos …………………………………………………..…………19 2.3.2 Estudios del voseo en comunidades centroamericanas…………………….22 2.3.2.1 El voseo nicaragüense ……………………………………………22 2.3.2.2 El voseo costarricense ……………………………………………24 2.3.2.3 El voseo salvadoreño y el voseo hondureño .………..………...…28 2.3.2.4 El voseo centroamericano en los Estados Unidos……..…..……..31 2.4. La (in)seguridad lingüística …………..……………………………………………..33 CAPÍTULO TRES: METODOLOGÍA…………………………………...……………………..35 3.1. Preguntas de investigación e hipótesis………..……………………………………..35 3.2. Los factores sociales analizados …………………………………………………….37 3.3. Los datos recogidos..………………………………………………...………………37 3.3.1. La herramienta principal: el cuestionario …………………………………38 3.3.2. La recolección de datos………………………………………..…………..40 3.3.3. Los participantes de Honduras …………………………………….……...40 3.3.4. Los participantes de Luisiana…….…………………………………….….41 iv 3.4. Las herramientas y las pruebas estadísticas …………………………………………42 CAPÍTULO CUATRO: RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN DE USOS ...……..…………………44 4.1. Análisis de los usos ………………………………………….………………………44 4.2. Usos según comunidad ………………...……………………………………………45 4.2.1. Factores sociales en el Distrito Central, Honduras ………………………..48 4.2.2. Factores sociales en Baton Rouge, Luisiana ………………………………55 4.3. Percepción de los usos pronominales desde la llegada a los Estados Unidos ………63 4.4. Usos según interlocutor …………………………………………………...…………64 CAPÍTULO CINCO: RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN DE ACTITUDES ………….…………72 5.1 La (in)seguridad lingüística de los hondureños …………..…………..………...……72 5.2. Percepción de corrección de los usos pronominales ….…..……..……………….….76 5.3. En la radio y la televisión……………………….……..…………………………….80 5.4. Entre hispanohablantes …………………………...………………………………....83 5.5. Relacionado con la educación y los ingresos ………………………………….….....84 5.6. Relacionado con el ámbito escolar y con niños ……………………………………..86 5.7. Relacionado con el género ……………………………………………………….....89 5.8. Entre conocidos y desconocidos……………………………..………………….…..91 5.9. Características de tú y vos…………………………………...………………………93 5.10. Discusión…………………………………………………………………………...95 CAPÍTULO SEIS: CONCLUSIONES ………………...……………………………………….98 6.1. Limitaciones …………………………………………………………………….….101 BIBLIOGRAFÍA …………………………………………………………………...…………..105 APÉNDICE A: CUESTIONARIO PARA LOS HONDUREÑOS EN HONDURAS……….112 APÉNDICE B: CUESTIONARIO PARA LOS HONDUREÑOS EN LUISIANA…………114 APÉNDICE C: CONSENTIMIENTO PARA PARTICIPAR EN LA INVESTIGACIÓN……116 APÉNDICE D: APROBACIÓN DE IRB……………………………………..……..………..118 APÉNDICE E: MODIFICACIÓN DE LA APROBACIÓN DE IRB………………………….119 VITA……………………………………………………………………………………………120 v LISTA DE TABLAS 1. Muestra del estudio de Honduras, según las variables sexo y edad…………………………...41 2. Muestra del estudio de Luisiana, según las variables sexo y edad ……………………………42 3. Distribución absoluta y porcentual de las formas de tratamiento en el castellano hondureño.................................................................................................................................45 4. Regresión logística multinomial del uso pronominal en LA en relación a HN……………….47 5. Regresión logística multinomial del uso pronominal en HN con las variables educación y edad .………………………………………………………………………………………......50 6. Regresión logística multinomial del uso pronominal en LA con las variables educación y edad ...…………………………………………………………………………………………57 7. Análisis descriptivo de las percepciones del uso pronominal personal en los participantes residentes en Luisiana, EE.UU……………………………………………………………......64 8. Comparación de los usos pronominales en diferentes dominios sociales en las comunidades estudiadas y en Rivera-Mills (2011).………………………………………………………….65 9. Análisis descriptivo de las afirmaciones relacionadas a la seguridad lingüística………...…...73 10. One-Way ANOVA con Tukey-Kramer post hoc para la afirmación “En Honduras se habla el mejor español de Latinoamérica” con la variable educación……………………….………74 11. Resultados del t-test para la afirmación “En Honduras/los Estados Unidos hablamos mal español” con la variable sexo…………………………………………………………….…...74 12. Resultados del t-test para la afirmación “El mejor español se habla en Tegucigalpa” con la variable comunidad…………………………………………………………………………....75 13. Análisis descriptivo de las opiniones sobre el uso pronominal correcto…………………….76 14. One-Way ANOVA con Tukey-Kramer post hoc para la afirmación 2 con la variable educación………………………………………………………………………………….…..78 15. One-Way ANOVA con Tukey-Kramer post hoc para la afirmación 3 con la variable educación……………………………………………………………………………………...79 16. Resultados del t-test para la afirmación 4 con la variable comunidad……………………….80 17. Análisis descriptivo de las actitudes hacia el uso pronominal en la radio y la televisión……81 vi 18. One-Way ANOVA con Tukey-Kramer post hoc para la afirmación 6 con la variable Educación ………………...…………………………………………………………………..82 19. Resultados del t-test para la afirmación 8 con la variable comunidad……………………….83 20. Análisis descriptivo de las actitudes hacia el uso pronominal con personas hispanohablantes ……………………………………………………………………………...83 21. Análisis descriptivo de las actitudes hacia el uso pronominal relacionado con la educación y los ingresos……………………………………………………………………………….…84 22. One-Way ANOVA con Tukey-Kramer post hoc para la afirmación 13 con la variable edad …………………………………………………………………………………………...85 23. One-Way ANOVA con Tukey-Kramer post hoc para la afirmación 14 con la variable educación ……………………………………………………………………………………..86 24. Análisis descriptivo de las actitudes hacia el uso pronominal relacionado con el ámbito escolar y con niños……………………………………………………………………………87 25. One-Way ANOVA con Tukey-Kramer post hoc para la afirmación 17 con la variable educación..………………………………………………………………….…………………88
Recommended publications
  • Diferencias Entre El Español Peninsular Y Rioplatense En El Uso De Los Pronombres Personales
    Filozofická fakulta Masarykovy univerzity Ústav románských jazyků a literatur Bakalářská diplomová práce DIFERENCIAS ENTRE EL ESPAÑOL PENINSULAR Y RIOPLATENSE EN EL USO DE LOS PRONOMBRES PERSONALES Michaela Šichová Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Ivo Buzek, Ph.D. Brno 2009 Prohlašuji, že jsem diplomovou práci vypracovala samostatně s využitím uvedených pramenů a literatury a že se její verze tištěná shoduje s verzí elektronickou. ……………………………. Ráda bych poděkovala panu doktoru Buzkovi za vedení mé bakalářské práce, za cenné rady a pomoc, které mi při její vypracování poskytl. 3 Índice 1. Introducción............................................................................................................................5 2. Pronombres.............................................................................................................................6 2.1. Características generales de los pronombres...................................................................6 2.2. Clasificación de los pronombres......................................................................................7 3. Pronombres personales..........................................................................................................9 3.1. Características de los pronombres personales.................................................................9 3.2. Formas de los pronombres personales...........................................................................10 3.2.1. Posición de los pronombres átonos y tónicos.......................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of the Complexity of Familiar Address in Chilean Spanish
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses 5-14-2010 The New Voseo Culto: An Exploration of the Complexity of Familiar Address in Chilean Spanish Patrick Roy Rouse University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Recommended Citation Rouse, Patrick Roy, "The New Voseo Culto: An Exploration of the Complexity of Familiar Address in Chilean Spanish" (2010). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 1118. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1118 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The New Voseo Culto: An Exploration of the Complexity of Familiar Address in Chilean Spanish A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In Romance Languages By Patrick R. Rouse B. A., The University of Southern Mississippi, 1999 May 2010 © 2010, Patrick R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Meaning of Variable Polite Leísmo in Mexico City
    THE SOCIAL MEANING OF VARIABLE POLITE LEÍSMO IN MEXICO CITY Valentyna Filimonova Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Departments of Linguistics and Spanish & Portuguese, Indiana University November 2020 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Doctoral Committee ______________________________________ Committee Co-chairperson: Manuel Díaz-Campos, PhD ______________________________________ Committee Co-chairperson: Joseph Clancy Clements, PhD ______________________________________ César Félix-Brasdefer, PhD ______________________________________ Julie Auger, PhD ______________________________________ Tania Leal, PhD Date of Defense: August 28, 2020 ii Valentyna Filimonova THE SOCIAL MEANING OF VARIABLE POLITE LEÍSMO IN MEXICO CITY Language is intricately complex and powerful. Even the smallest words, like the le pronoun in Spanish, are capable of meaning so much beyond their dictionary definition. This specific pronoun, roughly meaning a formal ‘you’, is found at the intersection of language, context, and society, with implications for understanding language and culture under the broader perspective of human behavior. This dissertation is the first variationist sociolinguistic study with experimental pragmatic component exploring the variable polite leísmo phenomenon in Spanish, focusing on the linguistic treatment of our various socially distant interlocutors. Furthermore, it is the first study to look at the production and perception of polite leísmo in interactive settings in search for its social meaning and value in Mexico City. Due to the complex implications of the variation found with this pronoun as direct object (Aijón Oliva, 2006; Parodi, Luna & Helmer, 2012; RAE 2010), the study makes use of complementary theoretical and methodological approaches common to the areas of morphosyntax, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing System of Costa Rican Pronouns of Address: Tuteo, Voseo, and Ustedeo”
    1 Article to appear as: Michnowicz, Jim, Despain, Scott & Gorham, Rebecca. In press. “The changing system of Costa Rican pronouns of address: tuteo, voseo, and ustedeo”. To appear in S. Rivera-Mills and M.I. Moyna (Eds.). Forms of address in the Spanish of the Americas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. This version may differ from the final published article. Please reference the published version. The changing system of Costa Rican pronouns of address: tuteo, voseo, and ustedeo Jim Michnowicz, Scott Despain, & Rebecca Gorham North Carolina State University Abstract The present study examines the reported use of three forms of address (tú, vos, usted) in Costa Rican Spanish. Previous studies have indicated three phenomena of interest: 1. Usted is used with [+solidarity] interlocutors (Moser, 2010b); 2. While tuteo has been historically absent, some studies suggest an increase in tuteo use among young speakers (cf. Quesada Pacheco, 2010); and 3. Older studies indicated that younger speakers were increasing their use of vos, the default informal pronoun in Costa Rica (cf. Vargas, 1974). Based on surveys with 209 participants, the present results indicate an increase in ustedeo among younger speakers, a result that contradicts earlier studies. Correspondingly, reported voseo is decreasing among younger speakers. Possible explanations for this pattern include the socio-political history of Costa Rica, as well as a linguistic reaction against the influx of voseo- using Nicaraguan immigrants in recent decades. Finally, no clear evidence of expanding tuteo is found, at least for the survey data analyzed here. Further data and conclusions are discussed. 1. Introduction1 Previous research has identified Costa Rican Spanish as possessing a binary system of pronouns of address, with vos as the familiar pronoun expressing solidarity, and usted as the 1 The authors wish to thank the audience at Spanish Linguistics in North Carolina 2013, the editors and the three anonymous reviewers for their feedback on this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Varieties of Spanish in the United States by J. Lipski Todd A
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Spanish Languages and Literatures Research and Languages, Literatures and Culture Faculty Publications Research and Publications 4-1-2010 Review of Varieties of Spanish in the United States by J. Lipski Todd A. Hernandez Marquette University, [email protected] Published version. NECTFL Review, Vol. 66 (Spring/Summer 2010): 130-132. Publisher link. © 2010 The orN theast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (NECTFL). Used with permission. The NECTFL Review 66 Lipski, John M. Varieties of Spanish in the United States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2008. ISBN: 978-1-58901-213-4. In John M. Lipski’s Varieties of Spanish in the United States, the author outlines the importance of the Spanish language in the United States and describes the major varieties of Spanish found here. This book consists of an introduction and 13 chapters. A brief historical account of each Spanish-speaking group, demographic information, sociolinguistic configurations, descriptive information about the Spanish varieties, and an overview of scholarship are presented in each chapter. In Chapter 1, Lipski gives a brief introduction to the major varieties of U.S. Spanish and to the circumstances that brought these groups to the United States. The demographics of U.S. Spanish and the teaching of Spanish as a second language in the United States are then discussed. In Chapter 2, the author outlines the scholarship on Spanish in the United States. He traces the evolution of U.S. Spanish studies from the pioneering work of Aurelio Espinosa, an expert on New Mexico Spanish, to the emergence of Spanish as a national language in the 1950s and 1960s, and to the study of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Dos Naranjas Or Doh Naranjah: a Study of Coda-S Variation in Buenos Aires
    Dos naranjas or doh naranjah A study of coda-s variation in Buenos Aires Spanish Salvatore Callesano Senior Honors Thesis, New York University Department of Linguistics Department of Spanish & Portuguese Spring 2013 Committee: Professor Gregory Guy, New York University (Chair) Professor María José Zubieta, New York University Professor Marcos Rohena-Madrazo, Middlebury College Callesano 2 Table of Contents - Abstract……………………………………………………………………… 3 Chapter One - Introduction…………………………………………………………… 4 - Background………………………………………………………….... 5 - Brief History of BAS…………………………………………………. 7 - Features of BAS……………………………….……………………… 10 - Social Variability……………………………….…………………….. 13 - Methodological Review……………………………….……………… 20 - The Four Realizations……………………………………………….... 25 Chapter Two - Results of Multivariate Analysis………………………….…………… 33 - Results for /s/……………………………….…………………………. 34 - Results for /h/……………………………….…………………………. 36 - Results for /ø/……………………………….…………………………. 38 - Results for /?/……………………………….…………………………. 40 Chapter Three - Linguistic Constraint Discussion……………………………………... 42 - Social Constraint Discussion………………………………………….. 46 Appendix…………………………………………………………………….. 49 Works Cited………………………………………………………………….. 52 Callesano 3 Abstract - Buenos Aires Spanish (BAS) is distinctive due to characteristics such as the use of the second person singular pronoun vos as opposed to tú and the alternation between /ʒ/-/ʃ/ (voiced and voiceless palato-alveolar fricatives) as realizations of Castilian /ʎ/. It is also one of several dialects of Latin American Spanish
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Functions and Implications of Voseo in Quito, Ecuador a Linguistic and Anthropological Account
    The Social Functions and Implications of Voseo in Quito, Ecuador A Linguistic and Anthropological Account Georgia C. Ennis Ennis 2 Acknowledgements I would first like to thank the many people that I met in Ecuador, without whom this research would not have been possible. I was consistently overwhelmed by their generosity in inviting me into their homes to share their experiences, as well as their friendship, with me. I also owe a debt of gratitude to The Quito Project for giving me the opportunity to work in Ecuador, and for allowing me to combine my research with my volunteer work. I would also like to thank my advisor, Teresa Satterfield, whose guidance has been incredibly influential in my academic development and in the completion of this project. I feel extremely fortunate to have formed a relationship with Professor Satterfield, as I have learned so much from her. Her advice, feedback and encouragement were instrumental in all stages of writing my thesis; she has truly helped me to grow as an academic and consider new perspectives on my work. In this vein, I must also thank Julia Paley for her insights on my work and for her introduction to writing ethnography; I have learned a great deal from her that I hope to carry into my future research. Finally, I would also like to express my gratitude to the many professors, fellow students and friends who discussed my ideas with me or patiently read drafts of my thesis. The fieldwork for this thesis was made possible by grants from the University of Michigan’s International Institute Individual Fellowship and Department of Anthropology Ennis 3 Preface “But vos is to say to the family, ‘we’re here with each other.’” — Luz Castillo, personal interview, San Blas, Quito, Ecuador, July 28, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Particularidades Del Idioma Español En Uruguay Particularities of The
    A. L. Zenkovich Particularidades del idioma español en Uruguay Alla Leonidovna Zenkovich, profesora titular del departamento del Español de la Universidad MGIMO, Moscú, Rusia. [email protected] Resumen. El objetivo del artículo es analizar las particularidades del idioma español en Uruguay que es una variedad del español rioplatense. Posee algunas diferencias con el resto de otras variantes rioplatenses (Argentina, Chile, Paraguay) y presenta un interés particular para los lingüistas, los profesores del español y los profesionales extranjeros que van a trabajar a Uruguay. Se analiza la historia de la variante uruguaya a partir de la conquista española, la influencia de los idiomas de la población autóctona (sobre todo de los indios guaraníes), la influencia del italiano y de sus dialectos debido a una importante emigración de este país, el fenómeno del bilingüismo, es decir la influencia del portugués (el conocido portuñol) y la influencia francesa debido a la inmigración francesa del siglo XIX que provocó la aparición de galicismos. Todas estas influencias han originado tales fenómenos lingüísticos como el voseo atípico, el tuteo, la entonación menos rítmica y un vocabulario bas- tante particular a comparar con el castellano de la Península. El estudio se basa en nuestros propios apuntes de dos viajes a Uruguay, en el “Nuevo diccionario de americanismos” (uruguayismos), materiales de la historia de América Latina y libros de los filólogos que dedicaron sus obras al estudio del tema. Palabras clave: idioma español, variedades nacionales del español, Uruguay, uruguayismo. Alla Zenkovich Particularities of the Spanish Language in Uruguay Abstract. The purpose of this article is to analyze the particular characteristics of the Spanish language in Uruguay, which is a variety of the Spanish language in Rio de la Plata (Argentina, Chili, Paraguay) and represents a special interest for the linguists, professors of Spanish language and foreign experts who go to work in Uruguay.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Traces of Portuguese in Afro-Yungueño Spanish? Abstract This Article Sheds New Light on the History of Afro-Yungueño Spanish
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2015 Traces of Portuguese in Afro-Yungueño Spanish? Perez, Danae Maria Abstract: This article sheds new light on the history of Afro-Yungueño Spanish (AY), an isolated variety of Spanish spoken by descendants of slaves in the Bolivian Yungas valleys, and examines the possibility of a Portuguese input to it. First, new ethnographic and historical data are introduced to show that the AY speakers in Mururata, Chijchipa, and Tocaña probably descend from African slaves who arrived in Bolivia during the 18th century from different parts of the Portuguese slave trade area. As this suggests that Portuguese may have been involved in the history of AY, the second part of this paper, after describing some of its particularities, compares AY with Africanized varieties of Portuguese, above all Afro- Brazilian Portuguese, to show that there is evidence to assume that AY is related to certain varieties of Afro-Portuguese. The final discussion considers the contributions of AY to the debates on Afro-Iberian speech varieties. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.30.2.04per Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-118942 Journal Article Accepted Version Originally published at: Perez, Danae Maria (2015). Traces of Portuguese in Afro-Yungueño Spanish? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 30(2):307-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.30.2.04per Traces of Portuguese in Afro-Yungueño Spanish? Abstract This article sheds new light on the history of Afro-Yungueño Spanish (AY), an isolated variety of Spanish spoken by descendants of slaves in the Bolivian Yungas valleys, and examines the possibility of a Portuguese input to it.
    [Show full text]
  • John M. Lipski
    Central American Spanish in the United States: Some Remarks on the Salvadoran Community John M. Lipski I. Latin American immigration to the United States is certainly not a new phenomenon, but the geographical areas of Hispanic America which are represented by the major migratory trends have shifted over time, al- though always set against the constant background of immigration from Mexico. The major population shifts have come from Puerto Rico and Cuba, respectively, but in recent years the immigration from Central America is giving every indication of eventually attain- ing the same proportions as the Caribbean groups (Peiialosa 1984). Economic reasons have been the prime motivating factor, but political pressures in the convulsed Central American region are playing an ever more important role in stimulating the northward migration of economically stable family units. Since there is no common border between Central America and the United States, and since many families arrive by air or by sea, there is a greater tendency to settle in geographically delimited population clusters, which then form centripetal nuclei attracting further immigra- tion. The largest areas of Central American population in the United States include the Honduran colony in New Orleans, and the Nicaraguan and Salvadoran colonies in LQSAngeles (Peiialosa 1984). Miami is also 01988 by John M. Lipski VOLUME 17, NO. 2 91 experiencing a large influx of Central Americans, as are Chicago and Houston; in the latter city, in addition to numerous Hondurans, Guatemalans and Nicaraguans, there is a massive immigration of Salvadoran refugees, through clandestine channels, whose numbers are es- timated at well over 100,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin American Spanish
    Latin American Spanish! ! " Universally seseísta! ! " Largely yeísta! ! " ustedes instead of vosotros! ! " For the most part, not leísta (except Paraguay and Ecuador)! ! " Many areas s-aspiration, r/l, consonant drop, d-weakening, etc.! Andalucista Position! ! " Latin American Spanish is an extension of Andalucian Spanish! ! " Initially it was assumed that most colonists came from Andalucia! ! " Accounts for the seemingly obvious W. Andalucian character of Latin American Spanish! Anti-Andalucista! ! " In the 1930s, research, based on a sample of 10,000 early colonists, showed that only 30% were from Andalucia! ! " Concluded that the similarities between Latin American and Andalucian Spanish were accidental - parallel developments! Andalucista again! ! " Later work found several factors that resurrected the Andalucista position! Andalucista factors! ! " While Andalucians were not the majority, they were the single largest group - even 30% is significant given that it was the largest group.! ! " The very first settlers to the Caribbean were overwhelmingly from Andalucia - leading to 'founder principle' effect ! ! " The majority of women colonists were from Andalucia! Additional factors! ! " Colonists typically spent up to a year in Sevilla waiting for permission to immigrate! ! " The voyage to America took a month or more on ships with Andalucian crews! Andalucista - but ...! ! " Why the Highland/Lowland contrast? ! ! " Highland regions (central Mexico, highland Colombia, Andean region, Boliva) lack several W. Andalucian features (e.g. s-loss,
    [Show full text]
  • El Voseo En Buenos Aires En Las Dos Primeras Décadas Del Siglo
    EL VOSEO EN BUENOS AIRES EN LAS DOS PRIMERAS DECADAS DEL SIGLO XIX La historia del voseo en Buenos Aires es un tema que ha suscitado diversas interpretaciones a lo largo de varias décadas. Curiosamente, una obra que ha tenido vasto eco y que se cita con frecuencia sobre la cuestión es Babel y el castellano, vo- lumen carente de un enfoque lingüístico, publicado por Ar- turo Capdevila en 1928. En este libro Capdevila se deja llevar por un apasionamiento purista, según el cual el voseo consti- tuye un "calamitoso rasgo" y una "ignominiosa fealdad" que conduce al caos espiritual, y señala que el uso de vos es sín- toma de incultura y barbarie. De acuerdo con esto, sostiene que tanto la clase culta de la generación de Mayo, como la del período rivadaviano, desconocía el voseo, y que el oscu- rantismo instaurado durante el gobierno de Rosas fue el res- ponsable de su difusión: Todo el Buenos Aires culto de 1810 decía de tú; todo Córdoba tam- bién. Mas, venido que fue el Tirano, se retornó al voseo. Que también hubo de parecer una adecuada forma de adulación y bajeza federal. Victoria oscura de la barbarie sobre la cobardía '. Y afirma más adelante, proféticamente: El día en que la mayoría de los hombres cultos se traten de tú en la Argentina (y ese día vendrá), el horrible voseo rioplatense no ha de ser sino una curiosidad del pasado y una ignominia más de los tiempos de Rosas -. 1 ARTURO CAPDEVILA, Babel y el castellano, 3* edición, Buenos Aires, Losada, 1954, pág.
    [Show full text]