DOCSLIB.ORG

Distribution and Abundance of Nearshore Fishes in the Anclote River Estuary, West-Central Florida Stephen T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Distribution and Abundance of Nearshore Fishes in the Anclote River Estuary, West-Central Florida Stephen T Northeast Gulf Science Volume 12 Article 10 Number 1 Number 1 11-1991 Distribution and Abundance of Nearshore Fishes in the Anclote River Estuary, West-Central Florida Stephen T. Szedlmayer Auburn University DOI: 10.18785/negs.1201.10 Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/goms Recommended Citation Szedlmayer, S. T. 1991. Distribution and Abundance of Nearshore Fishes in the Anclote River Estuary, West-Central Florida. Northeast Gulf Science 12 (1). Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/goms/vol12/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf of Mexico Science by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Szedlmayer: Distribution and Abundance of Nearshore Fishes in the Anclote Riv Northeast Gulf Science Vol. 12, No. 1 November 1991 75 DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE sive patches of seagrasses (Thalassia OF NEARSHORE FISHES testudinum, Syringodium filiforme, Halo­ IN THE ANCLOTE RIVER ESTUARY, dule wrightii, Halophila engelmannii, Rup­ WEST-CENTRAL FLORIDA pia maritima), mangroves, and oyster bars. Station 2, was a mesohaline habitat Fish species use estuarine areas as located 6.5 km from the mouth of the nurseries for their young (Gunter 1967). Anclote River. This station was character­ This facet of west Florida estuaries has ized by lack of rooted aquatic vegetation long been suggested (Reid 1954; Kilby and a shoreline with extensive stands of 1955; Springer and Woodburn 1960; Sykes black rush, Juncus roemerianus. Station and Finucane 1966), and subsequent trawl 3, was an oligohaline habitat located surveys have supported this phenomenon 9.6 km from the river mouth. This station (Livingston et a/. 1976; Weinstein et a/. was also characterized by lack of rooted 1977). Previous studies have concentrated aquatic vegetation, but shoreline vegeta­ efforts in more coastal or open bay waters tion was more typical of fresh waters, of the west Florida coast. West Florida including cattails Typha spp., and bald shallow estuarine habitats accessible cypress Taxodium distichum. only to seining or block nets have re­ Surface salinity and temperature ceived less attention (Subrahmanyam and measurements were made with a tem­ Drake 1975; Livingston 1975; Naughton perature compensated refractometer and and Saloman 1978; Subrahmanyam and mercury thermometer. Specimens were Coultas 1980; Price and Schlueter 1985; collected with a 1.5 mm mesh, 6.3 x 1.8 m Thayer et a/. 1987; Sogard et a/. 1987; seine net. A preliminary sample of 13 Sogard eta/. 1989). In addition, in littoral seine hauls per station in February 1980 waters where one would expect the revealed that species accumulation smallest size distributions, few studies in curves leveled off at eight seine hauls, west Florida estuaries used small and this number per station was used (<4 mm) mesh sizes (Price and Schlueter throughout the study. Collections were 1985; Thayer et a/. 1987). made every two weeks, from 26 March to The present study examines a pre­ 24 October, 1980, for a total of 361 seine viously unsampled "nearshore" fish com­ hauls (23 missing due to weather). Seine munity along the salinity gradient of the locations were chosen to maximize vari­ Anclote River estuary on the west-central ation in substrate and were repeated at coast of Florida. Sampling was designed the same locations throughout the study to capture the smallest nursery recruits period, except that distance from mean and resident fishes through the use of a high water level varied according to tidal fine (1.5 mm) mesh seine. stage. The seine was stretched parallel to the shore, 9.0 m from the water's edge, MATERIALS AND METHODS and the ends were simultaneously pulled to shore. The length of the seine was The Anclote River estuary is located 6.3 m with an effective sampling length of on the west-central coast of Florida be­ 4.5 m, thus, approximately 40m2 were tween latitudes 28°09.!..28°13'N and sampled per seine. longitudes 82°47.!..82°51W. Three stations Fish were preserved in the field with were sampled in the Anclote River estuary 10% seawater-formalin and changed to (Fig. 1). Station 1, was a polyhaline habitat 70% isopropyl alcohol after 24 hours. located at the mouth of the Anclote River. Individuals were identified, counted, and This station was characterized by exten- standard lengths measured in the labora- Published by The Aquila Digital Community, 1991 1 Gulf of Mexico Science, Vol. 12 [1991], No. 1, Art. 10 76 Short papers and notes Figure 1. Anclote River estuary sampling sites, Tarpon Springs, Florida. tory. Transient species were defined as 1981). those that complete their life cycle out­ side the estuary, and were assigned RESULTS juvenile or adult status from published lengths (Jones et at. 1978; Johnson 1978). Salinity averaged 30±2.7 Sd ppt and Total and species abundances (num­ ranged 22-34 ppt at station 1, 18±5.4 Sd bers + 1) I seine were transformed by ppt and 6-25 ppt at station 2, and 7 ± 4.3 base-10 logarithm. When assumptions of Sd ppt and 2-15 ppt at station 3. During normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and the sampling period from March to homogeneity (Bartlett-Box F-test) were October, 1980, the salinity gradient be­ met, parametric two-way analysis of tween stations always exceeded 4 ppt. At variance (2-way ANOVA) was used to test all three stations water temperature in­ for station, date, and interaction effects. creased from 23°C in March to 35°C in After significance was determined (0.05 July, then decreased to 25°C in October. level), a Tukey multicomparison test was There was little difference (<2°C) in tem­ used to identify particular differences. If perature among stations during any one conditions of normality and homogeneity sampling. were not met after transformations, a non­ Station 1 yielded the highest number parametric Kruskai-Wallis analysis of of species (37) and mean total abundance 2 variance (KW-2-way ANOVA) was used to of fishes (447 ± 1006 Sd/40 m ); station 2 test for significance (0.05 level; Zar 1984). yielded the lowest species (24) and abun­ 2 Multispecies distribution patterns were dance values (60± 193 Sd/40 m ); and examined by multidimensional scaling station 3 yielded intermediate species (30) (Schiffman et at. 1981; Field et a/. 1982). and abundance values (176±561 Sd/ 2 Species abundance data were root-root 40 m ). Abundance estimates were signif­ transformed and Manhattan-metric dis­ icantly different among stations (Fig. 2). tance used in the analysis. Iterations were Seasonally, only the highest abundance 2 stopped when Young's stress for succes­ collection date (791.4/40 m , 17 Jul), was sive iterations did not show improvement significantly different from the two lowest 2 greater than 0.000001 (Schiffman et at. collection dates (86.7/40 m , 13 Aug; https://aquila.usm.edu/goms/vol12/iss1/10 2 DOI: 10.18785/negs.1201.10 Szedlmayer: Distribution and Abundance of Nearshore Fishes in the Anclote Riv Northeast Gulf Science Vol. 12, No. 1 November 1991 77 2ooo w z w en 1500 ........ w u z <J: 1000 Clz :J ca <J: z <J: w ~ Figure 2. Mean total abundance/40m2 by station and date of nearshore fish species from the Anclote River estuary, Florida. Different letters denote significant differences among stations and among dates. There was also a significant interaction effect, not depicted (2-way ANOVA; 0.05 level). 2 6'1.7/40 m , 18 Sep; Fig. 2). In addition, summer-fall) the Anclote nearshore system there was a significant interaction effect was dominated by those species iden­ on mean total abundance between station tified as residents: M. beryl!i(la (78.'1% of and date (2-way ANOVA). total number), A. mitchil!i (10.5%), c. The estimated abundances of Meni­ variegatus ('1.0%), Gobiosoma bosci 1 dia beryllina , Lagodon rhomboides, (0.8%), Gambusia affinis (0.6%), and Leiostomus xanthurus, Cyprinodon vari­ Microgobius gu/osus (0.6%). Eight species egatus, and Eucinostomus argenteus, identified as transients, made up less showed significant station, date, and inter­ than 7% of the total abundance. Common action effects (KW-2-way ANOVA; Table '1, (>0.5%) transients included: L. rhom­ date and interaction effects not shown). boides (2.'1%}, L. xanthurus (1.8%), Brevo­ There were also several other patterns: ortia patronus ('1.0%), E. gula (0.9%), and station effect (Strongy/ura marina, Fun­ E. argenteus (0.7%). Also, juvenile stages dulus simi/is, and Poecilia /atipinna), date of all species were collected, confirming effect (F. grandis), interaction effect the nursery role of the Anclote River (Anchoa m itchilll), date and interaction estuary (Table '1). effects (Mugi/ cepha/us), and station and Changes in dominance occurred by date effects (Syngnathus scovef!J). During station and date. Menidia beryl/ina, the sampling period of this study (spring- dominated all months at station '1; April, May, and June, at station 2; and May 'Silvers ides were the most abundant taxon and iden­ through October at station 3 (Fig. 3). tified as Menidia beryl/ina, but may be a complex of M. beryl/ina and M. peninsu/ae (Chernoff eta/. Leiostomus xanthurus dominated stations 1981). 2 and 3 in March. Anchoa mitchilli domi- Published by The Aquila Digital Community, 1991 3 Gulf of Mexico Science, Vol. 12 [1991], No. 1, Art. 10 78 Short papers and notes Table 1. Species abundance pooled by date /40 m' at stations 1, 2, and 3 Anclote River estuary, Florida. Different letters denote significant difference among stations for particular species (KW·2·way AN OVA, 0.05 level), R =resident, T =transient species, J =juvenile, and A= adult.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rare Plants of Louisiana
    Rare Plants of Louisiana Agalinis filicaulis - purple false-foxglove Figwort Family (Scrophulariaceae) Rarity Rank: S2/G3G4 Range: AL, FL, LA, MS Recognition: Photo by John Hays • Short annual, 10 to 50 cm tall, with stems finely wiry, spindly • Stems simple to few-branched • Leaves opposite, scale-like, about 1mm long, barely perceptible to the unaided eye • Flowers few in number, mostly born singly or in pairs from the highest node of a branchlet • Pedicels filiform, 5 to 10 mm long, subtending bracts minute • Calyx 2 mm long, lobes short-deltoid, with broad shallow sinuses between lobes • Corolla lavender-pink, without lines or spots within, 10 to 13 mm long, exterior glabrous • Capsule globe-like, nearly half exerted from calyx Flowering Time: September to November Light Requirement: Full sun to partial shade Wetland Indicator Status: FAC – similar likelihood of occurring in both wetlands and non-wetlands Habitat: Wet longleaf pine flatwoods savannahs and hillside seepage bogs. Threats: • Conversion of habitat to pine plantations (bedding, dense tree spacing, etc.) • Residential and commercial development • Fire exclusion, allowing invasion of habitat by woody species • Hydrologic alteration directly (e.g. ditching) and indirectly (fire suppression allowing higher tree density and more large-diameter trees) Beneficial Management Practices: • Thinning (during very dry periods), targeting off-site species such as loblolly and slash pines for removal • Prescribed burning, establishing a regime consisting of mostly growing season (May-June) burns Rare Plants of Louisiana LA River Basins: Pearl, Pontchartrain, Mermentau, Calcasieu, Sabine Side view of flower. Photo by John Hays References: Godfrey, R. K. and J. W. Wooten.
    [Show full text]
  • SEAGRASS MEADOWS of TAMPA BAY - a REVIEW Roy R
    PROCEEDINGS TAMPA BAY AREA SClENTlFIC INFORMATION SYMPOaUM May 1982 Editors: Sara-Ann F, Treat Joseph L. Simon Roy R. Lewis 111 Robert L, Whitrnan, Jr. Sea Grant Project No. IR/82-2 Grant No, NASUAA-D-00038 Report Number 65 Florida Sea Grant College July 1985 Copyright O 1985 by Bellwether Press ISBN 0-8087-35787 Reproduced directiy from the author's manuscript. AII rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form whatsoever, by pho tograplr or rnimeognph or by any other means, by broadcast or transmission, by translation into any kind of language, nor by recording electronicalIy or otherwise, without permissio~lin writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer, who may quote brief passages in critical articles and reviews. Printed in the United States of America. SEAGRASS MEADOWS OF TAMPA BAY - A REVIEW Roy R. Lewis III Mangrove Systems, Inc. Post Office Box 15759 Tampa, Fi 33684 M. 3, Durako M. D. MoffIer Florida Department of Natural Resources Marine Research Laboratory 100 8th Avenue S.E. St. Petersburg, FL 33701 R, C. Phillips Department of Biology Seattle Pacific University Seattle, WA 981 19 ABSTRACT Seagtass meadows presently cover approximately 5,750 ha of the bottom of Tampa Bay, in 81% reduction from the historical coverage of approximately 30,970 ha, Five of the seven species of seagrass occurring in Florida are found in the estuary, typically in less than 2 rn of water. These are: Thalassia testudinum Banks ex Konig (turtle grassh S rin odium filiforme Kutzing (manatee grassh Halodule wrightii Ascherson+ shoal - grass);~uppia maritirna L, (widgeon= and Halophila engelmannii Ascherson, The dominant species are turtle grass and shoal grass.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Taxonomytaxonomy
    SeagrassSeagrass TaxonomyTaxonomy By Dr. Roy L. Lehman Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi TheThe InternationalInternational CodeCode ofof BotanicalBotanical NomenclatureNomenclature Rules for the use of scientific names are maintained and updated periodically at meetings of botanists called International Botanical Congress. Updated rules are published after congress in each new edition of The International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. Now can be found online as a web site. © Dr. Roy L. Lehman BackgroundBackground InformationInformation AuthorAuthor NamesNames Scientific names are often written with their author or authors, the individuals who are responsible for having given the plants their names • Lotus corniculatus L. • Lotus heermanii (Dur. & Hilg.) Greene z Both cases the generic name is Lotus, a genus in the pea family. z First specific epithet is an adjective that in Latin means “bearing a horn-like projection”. z The second was named in honor of A L. Heermann, a 19th century plant collector. z The name means Heermann’s lotus © Dr. Roy L. Lehman AuthorAuthor NamesNames The name or names of the authors follow the binomials z SurnamesSurnames areare oftenoften abbreviatedabbreviated •• asas L.L. forfor LinnaeusLinnaeus © Dr. Roy L. Lehman SecondSecond ExampleExample The second example is a little more complicated. Originally named by two naturalists: z E. M. Durand and z T. C. Hilgard z as Hosackia heermannii. Several years later, E. L. Greene concluded that the genus Hosackia should be merged with Lotus and transferred the specific epithet, heermannii from Hosackia to Lotus. © Dr. Roy L. Lehman SecondSecond ExampleExample Durand and Higard (the parenthetical authors) get credit for having published the epithet, heermannii.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Distribution and Status of Seagrass Ecosystems
    The global distribution and status of seagrass ecosystems ^^ ^^^H Discussion paper prepared for tlie UNEP-WCWIC Global Seagrass Workshop St Pete's Beach, Florida, 9 November, 2001 Prepared by: Mark D. Spalding, Michelle L. Taylor, Sergio Martins, Edmund P. Green, and Mary Edwards WA.. WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE Digitized by tine Internet Archive in 2010 witii funding from UNEP-WCIVIC, Cambridge Iittp://www.archive.org/details/globaldistributi01spal The global distribution and status of seagrass ecosystems Discussion paper prepared for tlie UNEP-WCIVIC Global Seagrass Workshop St Pete's Beach, Florida, 9 November, 2001 Prepared by: Mark D. Spalding, Michelle L. Taylor, Sergio Martins, Edmund P. Green, and Mary Edwards With assistance from: Mark Taylor and Corinna Ravilious Table of Contents Introduction to the workshop 2 The global distribution and status of seagrass ecosystems 3 Introduction 3 Definitions 3 The diversity of seagrasses 3 Species distribution 4 Associated Species 6 Productivity and biomass 7 The distribution and area of seagrass habitat 8 The value of seagrasses 13 Threats to seagrasses 13 Management Interventions 14 Bibliography; 16 29 Annex 1 : Seagrass Species Lists by Country Annex 2 - Species distribution maps 34 Annex 3 - Seagrass distribution maps 68 74 Annex 4 -Full list of MPAs by country ; /4^ ] UNEP WCMC Introduction to the workshop The Global Seagrass Workshop of 9 November 2001 has been set up with the expressed aim to develop a global synthesis on the distribution and status of seagrasses world-wide. Approximately 20 seagrass experts from 14 counu-ies, representing all of the major seagrass regions of the world have been invited to share their knowledge and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Phylogenetic Regionalization of Marine Plants Reveals Close Evolutionary Affinities Among Disjunct Temperate Assemblages Barna
    Phylogenetic regionalization of marine plants reveals close evolutionary affinities among disjunct temperate assemblages Barnabas H. Darua,b,*, Ben G. Holtc, Jean-Philippe Lessardd,e, Kowiyou Yessoufouf and T. Jonathan Daviesg,h aDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA bDepartment of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, Pretoria, South Africa cDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, United Kingdom dQuebec Centre for Biodiversity Science, Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada eDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, H4B 1R6, Canada; fDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida campus, Florida 1710, South Africa gDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada hAfrican Centre for DNA Barcoding, University of Johannesburg, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa *Corresponding author Email: [email protected] (B.H. Daru) Running head: Phylogenetic regionalization of seagrasses 1 Abstract While our knowledge of species distributions and diversity in the terrestrial biosphere has increased sharply over the last decades, we lack equivalent knowledge of the marine world. Here, we use the phylogenetic tree of seagrasses along with their global distributions and a metric of phylogenetic beta diversity to generate a phylogenetically-based delimitation of marine phytoregions (phyloregions). We then evaluate their evolutionary affinities and explore environmental correlates of phylogenetic turnover between them. We identified 11 phyloregions based on the clustering of phylogenetic beta diversity values. Most phyloregions can be classified as either temperate or tropical, and even geographically disjunct temperate regions can harbor closely related species assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrasses of Florida: a Review
    Page 1 of 1 Seagrasses of Florida: A Review Virginia Rigdon The University of Florida Soil and Water Science Departments Introduction Seagrass communities are noted to be some of the most productive ecosystems on earth, as they provide countless ecological functions, including carbon uptake, habitat for endangered species, food sources for many commercially and recreationally important fish and shellfish, aiding nutrient cyling, and their ability to anchor the sediment bottom. These communites are in jeopardy and a wordwide decline can be attributed mainly to deterioration in water quality, due to anthropogenic activities. Seagrasses are a diverse group of submerged angiosperms, which grow in estuaries and shallow ocean shelves and form dense vegetative communities. These vascular plants are not true grasses; however, their “grass-like” qualities and their ability to adapt to a saline environment give them their name. While seagrasses can be found across the globe, they have relatively low taxonomic diversity. There are approximately 60 species of seagrasses, compared to roughly 250,000 terrestrial angiosperms (Orth, 2006). These plants can be traced back to three distinct seagrass families (Hydrocharitaceae, Cymodoceaceace complex, and Zosteraceae), which all evolved 70 million to 100 million years ago from a individual line of monocotyledonous flowering plants (Orth, 2006). The importance of these ecosystems, both ecologically and economically is well understood. The focus of this paper will be to discuss the species of seagrass in Florida, the components which affect their health and growth, and the major factors which threaten these precious and unique ecosystems, as well as programs which are in place to protect and preserve this essential resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Biology of the Tropical-Subtropical Seagrasses of the Southeastern United States
    Reproductive Biology of the Tropical-Subtropical Seagrasses of the Southeastern United States Mark D. Moffler and Michael J. Durako Florida Department of Natural Resources Bureau of Marine Research 100 Eighth Ave., S.E. St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 ABSTRACT Studiesof reproductivebiology in seagrassesof the southeasternUnited States have addressed descriptive morphologyand anatomy,reproductive physiology, seed occurrence,and germination.Halodale wrightii Aschers.,Halophila engelmannii Aschers., Syringodium filiforme Kutz., and Thalassiatestudiaum Banks ex Konig are dioecious;Halophila decipiens Ostenfeld and Ruppiamaritima L. are monoecious.In Halophila johrtsoaii Eiseman, only fernale flowers are known. With the exception of R, maritima, which has hydroanemophilouspollination, these species have hydrophilous pollination. Recent reproductive-ecology studiessuggest that reproductivepatterns are due to phenoplasticresponses and/or geneticadaptation to physico-chemicalenvironmental conditions. Laboratory and field investigationsindicate that reproductive periodicityis temperaturecontrolled, but proposedmechanisms are disputed.Water temperature appears to influencefloral developmentand maybe importantin determiningsubsequent flower densities and fruit/seed production.Flowering under continuouslight in vitro suggeststhat photoperiodplays a limitedrole in floral induction.Flower expression and anthesis,however, may be influencedby photoperiod.Floral morpho- ontogeneticstudies of T. testudinumfield populationsdemonstrated the presenceof early-stageinflorescences
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Meadows - Encyclopedia of Earth
    Seagrass meadows - Encyclopedia of Earth http://www.eoearth.org/article/Seagrass_meadows Encyclopedia of Earth Seagrass meadows Lead Author: Carlos M. Duarte (other articles) Article Topics: Oceans and Marine ecology This article has been reviewed and approved by the following Topic Table of Contents Editor: Jean-Pierre Gattuso (other articles) 1 Introduction Last Updated: September 21, 2008 2 Adaptations to Colonize the Sea 3 Seagrass Distribution and Habitat 4 Seagrass Functions 5 Conservation Issues Introduction 6 Further Reading Seagrasses are angiosperms that are restricted to life in the sea. Seagrasses colonized the sea, from terrestrial angiosperm ancestors, about 100 million years ago, which indicates a relatively early appearance of seagrasses in angiosperm evolution. With a rather low number of species (about 50-60), seagrass comprise < 0.02% of the angiosperm flora. Seagrasses are assigned to two families, Potamogetonaceae and Hydrocharitaceae, encompassing 12 genera of angiosperms containing about 50 species (Table 1). Three of the genera, Halophila , Zostera and Posidonia , which may have evolved from lineages that appeared relatively early in seagrass evolution, comprise most (55%) of the species, while Enhalus , the most recent seagrass genus, is represented by a single species ( Enhalus acoroides , Photo 1: Posidonia oceanica meadow in the NW Table 1). Most seagrass meadows are monospecific, but Mediterranean. (Photograph by M. Sanfélix) may develop multispecies, with up to 12 species, meadows in subtropical and tropical waters. Adaptations to Colonize the Sea The colonization of the sea required a number of key adaptations including (1) blade or subulate leaves with sheaths, fitted for high-energy environments; (2) hydrophilous pollination, allowing submarine pollination (except for the genus Enhalus ) and subsequent propagule dispersal; and (3) extensive lacunar systems allowing the internal gas flow needed to maintain the oxygen supply required by their below-ground structures in anoxic sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Communities of the Gulf Coast of Florida: Status and Ecology
    CLINTON J. DAWES August 2004 RONALD C. PHILLIPS GEROLD MORRISON CLINTON J. DAWES University of South Florida Tampa, Florida, USA RONALD C. PHILLIPS Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas Sevastopol, Crimea, Ukraine GEROLD MORRISON Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County Tampa, Florida, USA August 2004 COPIES This document may be obtained from the following agencies: Tampa Bay Estuary Program FWC Fish and Wildlife Research Institute 100 8th Avenue SE 100 8th Avenue SE Mail Station I-1/NEP ATTN: Librarian St. Petersburg, FL 33701-5020 St. Petersburg, FL 33701-5020 Tel 727-893-2765 Fax 727-893-2767 Tel 727-896-8626 Fax 727-823-0166 www.tbep.org http://research.MyFWC.com CITATION Dawes, C.J., R.C. Phillips, and G. Morrison. 2004. Seagrass Communities of the Gulf Coast of Florida: Status and Ecology. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute and the Tampa Bay Estuary Program. St. Petersburg, FL. iv + 74 pp. AUTHORS Clinton J. Dawes, Ph.D. Distinguished University Research Professor University of South Florida Department of Biology Tampa, FL 33620 [email protected] Ronald C. Phillips, Ph.D. Associate Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas 2, Nakhimov Ave. Sevastopol 99011 Crimea, Ukraine [email protected] Gerold Morrison, Ph.D. Director, Environmental Resource Management Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County 3629 Queen Palm Drive Tampa, FL 33619 813-272-5960 ext 1025 [email protected] ii TABLE of CONTENTS iv Foreword and Acknowledgements 1 Introduction 6 Distribution, Status, and Trends 15 Autecology and Population Genetics 28 Ecological Roles 42 Natural and Anthropogenic Effects 49 Appendix: Taxonomy of Florida Seagrasses 55 References iii FOREWORD The waters along Florida’s Gulf of Mexico coastline, which stretches from the tropical Florida Keys in the south to the temperate Panhandle in the north, contain the most extensive and diverse seagrass meadows in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering Rush Biocontrol: Future Funding and Research CABI
    Flowering Rush Biocontrol: Future Funding and Research CABI Needs Jennifer Andreas*, Hariet L. Hinz, Patrick Häfliger, Jenifer Parsons, Greg Haubrich, Peter Rice, Susan Turner * [email protected], (253) 651-2197, www.invasives.wsu.edu Flowering Rush Biocontrol Consortium © 2004, Ben • Began in 2012 Legler • Partnership between WA, MT, ID, B.C., AB, © 2004, Ben CABI, MN, MS… • Updates provided to Legler distribution list • Outline – impact data needs © 2004, Ben – test plant list Legler – funding Flowering Rush Impacts Mackey, Chelan Chelan Mackey, CNWCB • FR impact data needed – strengthen biocontrol petition – increase likelihood of additional funding • Economic impact – herbicide, mechanical costs • Ecological impact – system impacts? – salmonid impacts?!?!? Österberg Marcus • Human health/ recreational impacts /SXC Flowering Rush Taxonomy • FR in subclass Alismatidae • Mobot: – Order: Alismatales – 2 families closely related: Hydrocharitaceae & Alismataceae (includes Limnocharitaceae) • USDA PLANTS Database – 3 orders: Alismatales, Hydrocharitales, Najadales – 3 families closely related Mobot, verrsion 12, Stevens, P.F. 2001 onward; http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/orders/alismatalesweb.htm Draft Test Plant List • 42 test plant species selected • Category 1: genetic types of target weed species in North America – test at least most common genotype for both cytotypes • Category 2: NA species in same genus – does not apply • Category 3: NA species in other genera in same family – does not apply Draft Test Plant List • Category
    [Show full text]
  • What Are Seagrasses? Florida's Seagrasses
    What are seagrasses? Seagrasses are grass-like flowering plants that live completely submerged in marine and estuarine waters. Although seagrasses occur throughout the coastal areas of Florida, they are most abundant in Florida Bay and from Tarpon Springs northward to Apalachee Bay in the Gulf. Seagrasses occur in protected bays and lagoons and also in deeper waters along the continental shelf in the Gulf of Mexico. The depth at which seagrasses are found is limited by water clarity because some species require higher levels of light. However, some species tolerate lower light levels than others and can grow at greater depths. Florida’s approximately 2,000,000 acres of sea- on Phillips on Phillips R grasses perform many significant functions: R • they help maintain water clarity by trapping fine Shoal-grass, Halodule wrightii Manatee-grass, Syringodium filiforme sediments and particles with their leaves; • they stabilize the bottom with their roots and Florida’s seagrasses rhizomes; • they provide shelter for fishes, crustaceans, and Although approximately 52 species of seagrasses exist Manatee-grass, Syringodium filiforme, is easily shellfish; and worldwide, only seven species are found in Florida’s recognizable because its leaves are cylindrical instead • they and the organisms that grow on them are food marine waters. Six of these are widespread in Florida of ribbon-like and flat like many other seagrass species. for many marine animals and water birds. and extend beyond its borders. The species of Halophila found in Florida are Star- The canopy of seagrass leaves protects young marine Widgeon-grass, Ruppia maritima, grows in both grass, Halophila engelmannii; Paddle-grass, Halophila animals from larger predators.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Broch
    What are seagrasses? Seagrasses are grass-like flowering plants that live un- derwater. Although seagrasses occur throughout the coastal areas of the state, they are most abundant in Florida Bay and from Tarpon Springs northward to Apalachee Bay in the Gulf. Seagrasses occur in protected bays and lagoons and also in places along the conti- nental shelf in the Gulf of Mexico. The depth at which seagrasses are found is limited by water clarity because they require light. Florida’s approximately 2,000,000 acres of sea- grasses perform many significant functions: • they help maintain water clarity by trapping fine sed- iments and particles with their leaves; on Phillips on Phillips R • they can stabilize the bottom with their roots and rhi- R zomes in much the same way that land grasses Shoal-grass, Halodule wrightii Manatee-grass, Syringodium filiforme slow soil erosion; • they provide shelter for many fishes, crustaceans, and Florida’s seagrasses Turtle-grass, Thalassia testudinum, the largest of shellfish; and the Florida seagrasses, characteristically has deeper root • they and the organisms that grow on them are food Although approximately 52 species of marine sea- structures than any of the other seagrasses. for many marine animals and water birds. grasses exist worldwide, only seven species are found Manatee-grass, Syringodium filiforme, is easily The “forest” of seagrass leaves protects young ma- in Florida waters. Four of these are widespread in recognizable because its leaves are cylindrical. rine animals from larger, open-water predators. Some Florida and extend beyond its borders. The species of Halophila are star-grass, Halophila animals, such as manatees and sea turtles, eat seagrass Ruppia maritima, or widgeon-grass, grows in both engelmannii; paddle-grass, Halophila decipiens; and blades.
    [Show full text]