DOCSLIB.ORG

SEAGRASS MEADOWS of TAMPA BAY - a REVIEW Roy R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SEAGRASS MEADOWS of TAMPA BAY - a REVIEW Roy R PROCEEDINGS TAMPA BAY AREA SClENTlFIC INFORMATION SYMPOaUM May 1982 Editors: Sara-Ann F, Treat Joseph L. Simon Roy R. Lewis 111 Robert L, Whitrnan, Jr. Sea Grant Project No. IR/82-2 Grant No, NASUAA-D-00038 Report Number 65 Florida Sea Grant College July 1985 Copyright O 1985 by Bellwether Press ISBN 0-8087-35787 Reproduced directiy from the author's manuscript. AII rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form whatsoever, by pho tograplr or rnimeognph or by any other means, by broadcast or transmission, by translation into any kind of language, nor by recording electronicalIy or otherwise, without permissio~lin writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer, who may quote brief passages in critical articles and reviews. Printed in the United States of America. SEAGRASS MEADOWS OF TAMPA BAY - A REVIEW Roy R. Lewis III Mangrove Systems, Inc. Post Office Box 15759 Tampa, Fi 33684 M. 3, Durako M. D. MoffIer Florida Department of Natural Resources Marine Research Laboratory 100 8th Avenue S.E. St. Petersburg, FL 33701 R, C. Phillips Department of Biology Seattle Pacific University Seattle, WA 981 19 ABSTRACT Seagtass meadows presently cover approximately 5,750 ha of the bottom of Tampa Bay, in 81% reduction from the historical coverage of approximately 30,970 ha, Five of the seven species of seagrass occurring in Florida are found in the estuary, typically in less than 2 rn of water. These are: Thalassia testudinum Banks ex Konig (turtle grassh S rin odium filiforme Kutzing (manatee grassh Halodule wrightii Ascherson+ shoal - grass);~uppia maritirna L, (widgeon= and Halophila engelmannii Ascherson, The dominant species are turtle grass and shoal grass. The meadows are subdivided into five types: 1) mid-bay shoal perennial; 2) healthy fringe perennial; 3) stressed fringe perennial; 41 ephemeral; and 5) colonizing perennial. The general characteristics of these meadow types are discussed, In addition, the habitat values, physiological ecology, reproductive biology and on-going research work are summarized. Seagrasses in Tampa Bay reproduce primarily vegetatively. Sexual reproduction occurs in T. testudinurn and R. maritima. Thalassia seed production is low, however, and confined tothe southern part of the Bay. Seed quantities may be insufficient for significant colonization and restoration projects, INTRODUCTION 1,100 metric tons of seagrasses by Seagrass beds have long been dredging and filling in Boca Ciega Bay recognized as a food source and habitat resulted in the immediate loss of 1,800 for benthic invertebrates and fish metric tons of infauna, and the annual (Phillips 19603 Randall 1965; Wmd et al. loss of approximately 73 metric tons of 1969). Hutton --et al, (1956) were among fisheries products and 1,100 metric tons the first researchers to recognize the of infauna (Taylor and Saioman 1968). importance of seagrass beds as fish and The loss of this habitat represented an wildlife habitats in Tampa Bay. They annual monetary ioss of $1.4 million. also recognized that development Godcharles (1971)found that the use of a activities along the shore and associated commercial hydraulic clam dredge in effects on these areas conflicted with Seagras beds uprooted all vegetation and conservation, fishing and recreational that no recofonization had occurred after interests. Indeed, the destruction of more than a year. He recommended that the use of these harvesters be prohibited productivity of seagrasses is believed to in grassy areas because of the be channeled through detritai pathways importance of such areas as nursery (Fig. 1 in Ogden 1980). grounds for the majority of Florida's Several studies dealing with Florida sport and comrnercizl species. In this seagrass beds and their associated animal regard, Lewis and Phillips (1980) found communiiies have included species lists that the loss of seagrass habitat in and population densities. (Voss and Voss Tampa Bay coincided with a reduction in 1955; Tabb and Manning 1961; Dragovich commerciaI landings of spotted seatrout. and Kelly 1964; Santos and Simon 1974; Seagrass habitat value is best Brook 1975; Stoner 1980; Livingston summarized by the scheme of Wood -et 1982). These studies show that diversity -ai. (1969): and abundance of fish and invertebrates are usually higher in grass beds than in I. Seagrasses have high growth and unvegetated habirats. Stoner (1980) production rates; found that abundances of epifauna, 2. The leaves support large numbers of suspension feeders and carnivorous epiphytic organisms with biomass polychaetes were correlated with approaching that of the seagrasses seagrass biomass. The increase in themselves; abundance of epifauna was related to 3. Although few organisms feed directfy increased surface zrea of leaf blades. on them, seagrasses produce large Taylor --et al, (1973) reported rhat for quantities of detritus which serves as each square meter of bed area, Thalassia a major food source for many species; leaf blades ave a total surfzce area of 4. Seagrasses bind sediments and up to 18 m '1. This large surface area prevent erosion, in turn providing a provides a correspondingly large amount quiescent environment in which a of substrate for epiphytes. great variety of organisms can grow; Mobile invertebrate epif auna, 5. Seagrasses provide organic matter including several species of echinoids, which encourages sulfate reduction asteroids and gastropods, feed upon the and an active sulfur cycie; and, seagrasses and epiphytes (Ogden 1980). 6. Seagrasses act as nutrient sinks and Other invertebrates such as some crabs, sources. shrimp and gastropods are carnivorous, feeding on smafIer herbivores and In addition, Ketchum (cited in Phillips detritus feeders. Some fish species 1978) has estimated that 80-90% of the within seagrass beds may folIow commercial and sport fish species depend developmental sequences that encompass on estuaries during all or part of their various rrophic levels from herbivory to fife cycle, and estuaries typically support carnivory (Livingston 1982). Many large seagrass beds. commercially important fish are present Dense populations of bacteria and in grass beds as juveniles obtaining both fungi are associated with seagrass beds food and shelter (Ogden 1980). The (Burkholder --et al. 1959; KIug 1980). major vertebrate consumers of sea- These microorganisms form a major grasses are sea turtles and manatees source of nutrition for detritus feeders (Zieman 1981). These animals "mow" or including various poiychaetes, crusta- "root" when feeding and can have ceans, mollusks and fish {Brook 1975; substantial localized impacts on grass O'Gower and W acasey 1967). Seagrass- beds (Packard 1931; Zieman 1981). derived detrita1 material is important in Waterfowl also feed on seagrasses which food webs within beds, and also in can constitute a major food source for detritai food webs based on material some species (McRoy 1966). exported from the system (Zieman 198 1). Direct herbivory forms the basis OCCURRENCE AND DISTRIBUTION for the third type of food web based on Eiseman (1980) notes the seagrasses. However, most of the occurrence of seven species of seagrasses in Florida: Phillips (1980) and Moffler and Durako (unpubiished data). Thus five of the 1. Thalassia testudinum Banks ex Konig seven Florida species of seagrasses have ' -ass) been reported to occur in Tampa Bay. filiforme Kutzing PhiIlips (1962, p. 81, sampling at 98 stations between Pinellas Point and 3. MaIodule wrightii Ascherson (shoal Terra Ceia Bay during 1959-60 (Fig. 11, grass) noted that "all attached plants were maritima Linnaeus (widgeon limited to waters inshore of the one fathom curve". Also, ".,. Diplanthera 5. Halo~hilaen~eirnannii Ascherson (Halodule) is dominant in the southern 6. Halophila decipiens Ostenfeid portions of the bay while Ruppia is 7. Halophila johnsonii Eiseman dominant in the most northerly-~rtions". Lewis and PhiIlips (1980) reported The last species is newly described the results of 226 samples collected (Eiseman and McMillan 1980) and seasonally at 18 inshore stations during historically has probably been confused 1980-8 1, and found 42.5% of rhe samples with H. deci iens- (Eiseman 1980). contained Thalassia testudinurn, 46.7% ~hi954)mentioned the HaIodule -wiii 19.0% Svrin~odium occurrence of five of these species in filiforme, 15.5% Ruppia rnaritima, and Tampa Bay: ThaJassia testudinurn, none contained Halophila engeImannii S yringodium filif orme, Halodule wrightii, (Table I). Table 2 lists the seagrass Halo~hija eneelrnannii. and .IIRUDD~~ associations found during the same -rnaritima. Phillips (1962) conducted the sampling program. Single species were first comprehensive field sampling for found in 83.3% of the samples. Four seagrasses in Tampa Bay during 1959-60 species associations occurred in the and- reported the - occurrence %f all of remainder of the sampIes, with H. these species except H, en~elmannii. wrightii/E. maritima being the most Taylor and Saloman (1969) summarized common (8.89/o),f o~lowed by -T. data for 773 benthic sampIes taken filiforrne (5.3%j, T. during 1961-65 along 18 transects within wrightii (2.2%) and Tampa Bay and noted the occurrence of wrightii/S.- filif orme seagrasses in 227 (34%) of the samples. No R. maritima was reported, probably Based on the currentiy available due to difficulty in distinguishing it from aerial photography of Tampa Bay (198 11, -H. wrightii without close examination. Figure 2 was prepared. It shows 5,750 ha -H. engelmannii was reported at only 2 (14,203 acres) of seagrass meadows in stations, both in Boca Ciega Bay. Taylor Tampa Bay, Similar working maps were (1973) also reported its occurrence prepared using vertical bla=k and white behind Egmont Key. More recentjy, it aerial photography of Tampa Bay , has been observed around Cockroach Bay (secured from the National Archives, in Middle Tampa Bay by Lewis and Washington, DC) that had been taken by Table 1. Percent species occurrence, Tampa Bay (Lewis and Phillips 1980), Percent of samples in which species was collected, n = 226. SPECIES PERCENT Thalassia testudinurn Halodule wrightii---- Syringodium filiforme RUDD~~maritima -Halophila engelmannii Figure I.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Record of the Seagrass Species Halophila Major (Zoll.) Miquel in Vietnam: Evidence from Leaf Morphology and ITS Analysis
    DOI 10.1515/bot-2012-0188 Botanica Marina 2013; 56(4): 313–321 Nguyen Xuan Vy*, Laura Holzmeyer and Jutta Papenbrock New record of the seagrass species Halophila major (Zoll.) Miquel in Vietnam: evidence from leaf morphology and ITS analysis Abstract: The seagrass Halophila major (Zoll.) Miquel (i) the number of cross veins, which ranges from 18 to 22, is reported for the first time from Vietnam. It was found and (ii) the ratio of the distance between the intramar- growing with other seagrass species nearshore, 4–6 m ginal vein and the lamina margin at the half-way point deep at Tre Island, Nha Trang Bay. Leaf morphology and along the leaf length, which is 1:20–1:25 (Kuo et al. 2006). phylogenetic analysis based on ribosomal internal tran- Recently, genetic markers, including plastid and nuclear scribed spacer sequences confirmed the identification. sequences, have been used to reveal the genetic relation- There was very little sequence differentiation among sam- ships among members of the genus Halophila. Among the ples of H. major collected in Vietnam and other countries molecular markers used, neither single sequence analysis in the Western Pacific region. A very low evolutionary of the plastid gene encoding the large subunit of ribulose- divergence among H. major populations was found. 1,5-bisphosphate-carboxylase-oxygenase (rbcL) and of the plastid maturase K (matK) nor analysis of the concat- Keywords: Halophila major; internal transcribed spacer; enated sequences of the two plastid markers has resolved new record; seagrass; Vietnam. the two closely related species H. ovalis and H. ovata (Lucas et al.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California, Berkeley Student Research Papers, Fall 1996
    Q H /ironmental Science, Policy and Management 107, Geography 142, IDS 158, and Integrative Biology 198 *• M6 B56 T he B iology and G eomorphology 1996 BIOS of T ropical Isla n d s RESERVES Student Research Papers, Fall 1996 Richard B. Gump South Pacific Biological Research Station Moorea, French Polynesia University of California, Berkeley A b o v e : The 1996 Moorea Class, on the front lawn of the Gump Research Station, with Cook's Bay and fringing reef in the background. Standing, from left: Jenmfer Conners, Morgan Hannaford (Graduate Student Instructor), Sandra Trujillo, Solomon Dobrowski, Brent Mishler (Professor, IB), Ylva Carosone, Stephanie Yelenik, Joanna Canepa, Kendra Bergstrom, Peter Weber (Graduate Student Instructor), Julianne Ludwig, Larry Rabin, Damien Filiatrault, Steve Strand (Executive Director, Gump Research Station), and Carole Hickman (Professor, IB). Reclining or seated, from left: Xavier Mayali, Chris Feldman, Sapna Khandwala, Isa Woo, Tracy Benning (Professor, ESPM), Patricia Sanchez Baracaldo (Graduate Student Instructor), and Michael Emmett. B elo w : The beach and lagoon atTetiaroa, site of a class field trip, with Tahiti (left) and Moorea (right) in the background. Environmental Science, Policy and Management 107, Geography 142, IDS 158, Integrative Biology 158 ' ? /A (e 1996 Student Research papers TABLE OF CONTENTS NK\\V0l( \cK $[05 Introductory remarks. Brent D. Mishler 1 The distribution and morphology of seagrass (Halophila Michael Alan Emmett 2 decipiens) in Moorea, French Polynesia. Zonation of lagoon algae in Moorea, French Polynesia. Xavier Mayali 15 Distributional patterns of mobile epifauna associated with Kendra G. Bergstrom 26 two species of brown algae (Phaeophyta) in a tropical reef ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Reef Squid)
    UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Ecology Sepioteuthis sepioidea (Caribbean Reef Squid) Order: Teuthida (Squid) Class: Cephalopoda (Octopuses, Squid and Cuttlefish) Phylum: Mollusca (Molluscs) Fig. 1. Caribbean reef squid, Sepioteuthis sepioidea. [http://www.arkive.org/caribbean-reef-squid/sepioteuthis-sepioidea/image-G76785.html, downloaded 10 March 2016] TRAITS. The mantle (body mass) is wide and relatively flattened, with a length of 114mm in adult males and 120 mm in adult females (Moynihan and Rodaniche, 1982). A skeleton is absent but a cartilaginous layer is normally found beneath the surface of the mantle which enables movement (Mather et al., 2010).Two fins span the length of the lateral mantle margins (Fig. 1). The head is slightly pointed to its anterior end, with eight arms and two tentacles which encircle the mouth (Mather et al., 2010). Suckers are positioned along the inner region of arms and tentacle clubs. The mantle is fleshy when relaxed and the skin is very fragile (Moynihan and Rodaniche, 1982). The colour patterns of the skin can change periodically, due to the existence of light-reflective and iridescence-inducing cells (Mather, 2010). DISTRIBUTION. Distributed throughout the West Indian islands, including Trinidad and Tobago; widespread along the Central and South American coasts adjacent to the Caribbean Sea and also found in Bermuda and Florida (Moynihan and Rodaniche, 1982). UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Ecology HABITAT AND ACTIVITY. Found in highly saline, clear waters of marine habitats at varying depths and distances from shoreline (Wood et al., 2008). The depth and habitat they are observed at depends on their growth stage (Mather et al., 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Seagrass Distribution and Diversity: a Bioregional Model ⁎ F
    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 3–20 www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe Global seagrass distribution and diversity: A bioregional model ⁎ F. Short a, , T. Carruthers b, W. Dennison b, M. Waycott c a Department of Natural Resources, University of New Hampshire, Jackson Estuarine Laboratory, Durham, NH 03824, USA b Integration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD 21613, USA c School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811 Queensland, Australia Received 1 February 2007; received in revised form 31 May 2007; accepted 4 June 2007 Abstract Seagrasses, marine flowering plants, are widely distributed along temperate and tropical coastlines of the world. Seagrasses have key ecological roles in coastal ecosystems and can form extensive meadows supporting high biodiversity. The global species diversity of seagrasses is low (b60 species), but species can have ranges that extend for thousands of kilometers of coastline. Seagrass bioregions are defined here, based on species assemblages, species distributional ranges, and tropical and temperate influences. Six global bioregions are presented: four temperate and two tropical. The temperate bioregions include the Temperate North Atlantic, the Temperate North Pacific, the Mediterranean, and the Temperate Southern Oceans. The Temperate North Atlantic has low seagrass diversity, the major species being Zostera marina, typically occurring in estuaries and lagoons. The Temperate North Pacific has high seagrass diversity with Zostera spp. in estuaries and lagoons as well as Phyllospadix spp. in the surf zone. The Mediterranean region has clear water with vast meadows of moderate diversity of both temperate and tropical seagrasses, dominated by deep-growing Posidonia oceanica.
    [Show full text]
  • Reassessment of Seagrass Species in the Marshall Islands1
    Micronesica 2016-04: 1–10 Reassessment of Seagrass Species in the Marshall Islands 1 ROY T. TSUDA Department of Natural Sciences, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, HI 96817, USA [email protected] NADIERA SUKHRAJ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, 300 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96850, USA [email protected] Abstract—Recent collections of specimens of Halophila gaudichaudii J. Kuo, previously identified as Halophila minor (Zollinger) den Hartog, from Kwajalein Atoll in September 2016 and the archiving of the specimens at BISH validate the previous observation of this seagrass genus in the Marshall Islands. Previously, no voucher specimen was available for examination. Molecular analyses of the Kwajalein Halophila specimens may demonstrate conspecificity with Halophila nipponica J. Kuo with H. gaudichaudii relegated as a synonym. Herbarium specimens of Cymodocea rotundata Ehrenberg and Hemprich ex Ascherson from Majuro Atoll were found at BISH and may represent the only specimens from the Marshall Islands archived in a herbarium. Cymodocea rotundata, however, has been documented in past literature and archived via digital photos in its natural habitat in Majuro. The previous validation of Thalassia hemprichii (Ehrenberg) Ascherson with specimens, and the recent validation of Halophila gaudichaudii and Cymodocea rotundata with specimens reaffirm the low coral atolls and islands of the Marshall Islands as the eastern limit for the three species in the Pacific Ocean. Introduction In a review of the seagrasses in Micronesia, Tsuda et al. (1977) reported nine species of seagrasses in Micronesia with new records of Thalassodendron ciliatum (Forsskål) den Hartog from Palau, and Syringodium isoetifolium (Ascherson) Dandy and Cymodocea serrulata (R.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Coastal Submerged Aquatic Vegetation
    ASMFC Habitat Management Series #1 Atlantic Coastal Submerged Aquatic Vegetation: A Review of its Ecological Role, Anthropogenic Impacts State Regulation, and Value to Atlantic Coastal Fish Stocks NOTE: Electronic version may be missing tables or figures. Contact ASMFC at 202/289-6400 for copies. Edited by C. Dianne Stephan Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission and Thomas E. Bigford National Marine Fisheries Service April 1997 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Acknowledgments..............................................................................................................ii Introduction.......................................................................1 TECHNICAL PAPERS Ecological Value Of Seagrasses: A Brief Summary For The ASMFC Habitat Committee's SAV Subcommittee .............................................................................. 7 The Relationship Of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Ecological Value To Species Managed By The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC): Summary For The ASMFC SAV Subcommittee.................................. 13 Human Impacts On SAV - A Chesapeake Bay Case Study ........................................ 38 State Regulation And Management Of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Along The Atlantic Coast Of The United States ................................................................... 42 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Bibliography Of Selected Seagrass Papers ........................................... 57 Appendix 2: SAFMC Policy for Protection and Enhancement of Marine Submerged Aquatic
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plants of Louisiana
    Rare Plants of Louisiana Agalinis filicaulis - purple false-foxglove Figwort Family (Scrophulariaceae) Rarity Rank: S2/G3G4 Range: AL, FL, LA, MS Recognition: Photo by John Hays • Short annual, 10 to 50 cm tall, with stems finely wiry, spindly • Stems simple to few-branched • Leaves opposite, scale-like, about 1mm long, barely perceptible to the unaided eye • Flowers few in number, mostly born singly or in pairs from the highest node of a branchlet • Pedicels filiform, 5 to 10 mm long, subtending bracts minute • Calyx 2 mm long, lobes short-deltoid, with broad shallow sinuses between lobes • Corolla lavender-pink, without lines or spots within, 10 to 13 mm long, exterior glabrous • Capsule globe-like, nearly half exerted from calyx Flowering Time: September to November Light Requirement: Full sun to partial shade Wetland Indicator Status: FAC – similar likelihood of occurring in both wetlands and non-wetlands Habitat: Wet longleaf pine flatwoods savannahs and hillside seepage bogs. Threats: • Conversion of habitat to pine plantations (bedding, dense tree spacing, etc.) • Residential and commercial development • Fire exclusion, allowing invasion of habitat by woody species • Hydrologic alteration directly (e.g. ditching) and indirectly (fire suppression allowing higher tree density and more large-diameter trees) Beneficial Management Practices: • Thinning (during very dry periods), targeting off-site species such as loblolly and slash pines for removal • Prescribed burning, establishing a regime consisting of mostly growing season (May-June) burns Rare Plants of Louisiana LA River Basins: Pearl, Pontchartrain, Mermentau, Calcasieu, Sabine Side view of flower. Photo by John Hays References: Godfrey, R. K. and J. W. Wooten.
    [Show full text]
  • STRESSOR RESPONSE MODEL for the SEAGRASSES, Halodule Wrightii and Thalassia Testudinum
    Final Report for Technical Assistance for an Ecological Evaluation of the Southwest Florida Feasibility Study STRESSOR RESPONSE MODEL FOR THE SEAGRASSES, Halodule wrightii and Thalassia testudinum By Frank J. Mazzotti, Leonard G. Pearlstine, Robert Chamberlain, Tomma Barnes, Kevin Chartier, and Donald DeAngelis Joint Ecosystem Modeling Laboratory Technical Report FINAL REPORT for Technical Assistance for an Ecological Evaluation of the Southwest Florida Feasibility Study STRESSOR RESPONSE MODELS FOR THE SEAGRASSES, Halodule wrightii and Thalassia testudinum Prepared By: Frank J. Mazzotti1, Leonard G. Pearlstine1, Robert Chamberlain 2, Tomma Barnes3, Kevin Chartier1, and Donald DeAngelis4 1University of Florida Ft. Lauderdale Research and Education Center 3205 College Ave Davie, FL 33314 (954) 577-6304 2South Florida Water Management District 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, FL 33406 3Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan 3501 North Causeway Blvd., Suite 725 Metairie, LA 70001 (504) 862-1481 4United States Geological Survey University of Miami, Dept. of Biology 1301 Memorial Dr. RM 215 Coral Gables, FL 33146 Prepared For: South Florida Water Management District Fort Myers Service Center 2301 McGregor Blvd. Fort Myers, FL 33901 United States Geological Survey 1301 Memorial Dr. RM 215 Coral Gables, FL 33146 (305) 284-3974 May 2007 ii University of Florida This report should be cited as: Mazzotti, F.J., Pearlstine, L.G., Chamberlain, R., Barnes, T., Chartier, K., and DeAngelis, D. 2007, Stressor response models for Seagrasses, Halodule wrightii and Thalassia testudnium. JEM Technical Report. Final report to the South Florida Water Management District and the U.S..Geological Survey. University of Florida, Florida Lauderdale Research and Education Center, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 19 pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Taxonomytaxonomy
    SeagrassSeagrass TaxonomyTaxonomy By Dr. Roy L. Lehman Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi TheThe InternationalInternational CodeCode ofof BotanicalBotanical NomenclatureNomenclature Rules for the use of scientific names are maintained and updated periodically at meetings of botanists called International Botanical Congress. Updated rules are published after congress in each new edition of The International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. Now can be found online as a web site. © Dr. Roy L. Lehman BackgroundBackground InformationInformation AuthorAuthor NamesNames Scientific names are often written with their author or authors, the individuals who are responsible for having given the plants their names • Lotus corniculatus L. • Lotus heermanii (Dur. & Hilg.) Greene z Both cases the generic name is Lotus, a genus in the pea family. z First specific epithet is an adjective that in Latin means “bearing a horn-like projection”. z The second was named in honor of A L. Heermann, a 19th century plant collector. z The name means Heermann’s lotus © Dr. Roy L. Lehman AuthorAuthor NamesNames The name or names of the authors follow the binomials z SurnamesSurnames areare oftenoften abbreviatedabbreviated •• asas L.L. forfor LinnaeusLinnaeus © Dr. Roy L. Lehman SecondSecond ExampleExample The second example is a little more complicated. Originally named by two naturalists: z E. M. Durand and z T. C. Hilgard z as Hosackia heermannii. Several years later, E. L. Greene concluded that the genus Hosackia should be merged with Lotus and transferred the specific epithet, heermannii from Hosackia to Lotus. © Dr. Roy L. Lehman SecondSecond ExampleExample Durand and Higard (the parenthetical authors) get credit for having published the epithet, heermannii.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of a Workshop for Monitoring
    Seagrass-Watch Proceedings of a Workshop for Monitoring Seagrass Habitats in the Kimberley Region, Western Australia Department of Environment & Conservation - West Kimberly Office Broome, Western Australia 23-24 August 2009 Len McKenzie & Rudi Yoshida First Published 2009 ©Seagrass-Watch HQ, 2009 Copyright protects this publication. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Disclaimer Information contained in this publication is provided as general advice only. For application to specific circumstances, professional advice should be sought. Seagrass-Watch HQ has taken all reasonable steps to ensure the information contained in this publication is accurate at the time of the survey. Readers should ensure that they make appropriate enquires to determine whether new information is available on the particular subject matter. The correct citation of this document is McKenzie, LJ & Yoshida, R.L. (2009). Seagrass-Watch: Proceedings of a Workshop for Monitoring Seagrass Habitats in the Kimberley Region, Western Australia. Department of Environment & Conservation - West Kimberley Office, Broome, 23 - 24 August 2009. (Seagrass-Watch HQ, Cairns). 58pp. Produced by Seagrass-Watch HQ Front cover photos (left to right) Town Beach Broome, One Arm Creek and
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Distribution and Status of Seagrass Ecosystems
    The global distribution and status of seagrass ecosystems ^^ ^^^H Discussion paper prepared for tlie UNEP-WCWIC Global Seagrass Workshop St Pete's Beach, Florida, 9 November, 2001 Prepared by: Mark D. Spalding, Michelle L. Taylor, Sergio Martins, Edmund P. Green, and Mary Edwards WA.. WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE Digitized by tine Internet Archive in 2010 witii funding from UNEP-WCIVIC, Cambridge Iittp://www.archive.org/details/globaldistributi01spal The global distribution and status of seagrass ecosystems Discussion paper prepared for tlie UNEP-WCIVIC Global Seagrass Workshop St Pete's Beach, Florida, 9 November, 2001 Prepared by: Mark D. Spalding, Michelle L. Taylor, Sergio Martins, Edmund P. Green, and Mary Edwards With assistance from: Mark Taylor and Corinna Ravilious Table of Contents Introduction to the workshop 2 The global distribution and status of seagrass ecosystems 3 Introduction 3 Definitions 3 The diversity of seagrasses 3 Species distribution 4 Associated Species 6 Productivity and biomass 7 The distribution and area of seagrass habitat 8 The value of seagrasses 13 Threats to seagrasses 13 Management Interventions 14 Bibliography; 16 29 Annex 1 : Seagrass Species Lists by Country Annex 2 - Species distribution maps 34 Annex 3 - Seagrass distribution maps 68 74 Annex 4 -Full list of MPAs by country ; /4^ ] UNEP WCMC Introduction to the workshop The Global Seagrass Workshop of 9 November 2001 has been set up with the expressed aim to develop a global synthesis on the distribution and status of seagrasses world-wide. Approximately 20 seagrass experts from 14 counu-ies, representing all of the major seagrass regions of the world have been invited to share their knowledge and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Phylogenetic Regionalization of Marine Plants Reveals Close Evolutionary Affinities Among Disjunct Temperate Assemblages Barna
    Phylogenetic regionalization of marine plants reveals close evolutionary affinities among disjunct temperate assemblages Barnabas H. Darua,b,*, Ben G. Holtc, Jean-Philippe Lessardd,e, Kowiyou Yessoufouf and T. Jonathan Daviesg,h aDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA bDepartment of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, Pretoria, South Africa cDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, United Kingdom dQuebec Centre for Biodiversity Science, Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada eDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, H4B 1R6, Canada; fDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida campus, Florida 1710, South Africa gDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada hAfrican Centre for DNA Barcoding, University of Johannesburg, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa *Corresponding author Email: [email protected] (B.H. Daru) Running head: Phylogenetic regionalization of seagrasses 1 Abstract While our knowledge of species distributions and diversity in the terrestrial biosphere has increased sharply over the last decades, we lack equivalent knowledge of the marine world. Here, we use the phylogenetic tree of seagrasses along with their global distributions and a metric of phylogenetic beta diversity to generate a phylogenetically-based delimitation of marine phytoregions (phyloregions). We then evaluate their evolutionary affinities and explore environmental correlates of phylogenetic turnover between them. We identified 11 phyloregions based on the clustering of phylogenetic beta diversity values. Most phyloregions can be classified as either temperate or tropical, and even geographically disjunct temperate regions can harbor closely related species assemblages.
    [Show full text]