The Role of Internal Politics in American Diplomacy
For a Dollar and a Dream: State Lotteries and American Inequality Jonathan D. Cohen Newton, Massachusetts BA, McGill University, 2013 MA, University of Virginia, 2015 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia March, 2019 © Copyright by Jonathan D. Cohen All rights reserved March 2019 ABSTRACT Americans are obsessed with playing the lottery in pursuit of life-changing jackpots. Every year, Americans spend over $80 billion on lottery tickets, more than they spend on books, sports tickets, video games, music, and movie tickets combined. “For a Dollar and a Dream” illustrates the parallels between lottery players and the political actors who facilitated the spread of legalized gambling in the United States. In an era of declining social mobility and rising inequality, millions of bettors turned to lotteries driven by the hopeful, wishful belief that gambling could solve their financial problems. Similarly, between 1963 and 2013, 44 states enacted lotteries because lotteries appeared to offer something for nothing, a painless solution to the pressing political and financial problems that beset state governments in the post-World War II period. Voters and legislators refused to confront the conflict between their demands for tax breaks and their desire for government services, and they turned instead to gambling, hoping for a budgetary miracle. “For a Dollar and a Dream” illustrates that the magical thinking frequently condemned among lottery players represented a fundamental feature of many citizens’ relationship with government in the late twentieth century. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction…………………………………………………...…………………...………………1 Chapter 1: Something for Nothing: The Fiscal Alchemy of Lottery Legalization………............19 Chapter 2: Not Luck, But the Work of God: The Meritocracy of Lottery Miracles.…...….…….59 Chapter 3: Rivers of Gold: Scientific Games Inc.
[Show full text]