Soviet Jewish Immigrants: a Study in Ethnic Identity A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Soviet Jewish Immigrants: a Study in Ethnic Identity A SOVIET JEWISH IMMIGRANTS: A STUDY IN ETHNIC IDENTITY A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Anthropology University of Houston In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts By Barbara E. Liss December 1978 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my appreciation to Mr. Sol Brownstein, executive director of the Jew­ ish Family Service, Houston, Texas, for allowing me to interview the agency's immigrant clients. Also, I want to thank Ms. Barbara Meistrich, the social worker at the Jewish Family Service who first introduced me to the immigrant community and took a great interest in the study. SOVIET JEWISH IMMIGRANTS: A STUDY IN ETHNIC IDENTITY An Abstract of a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Anthropology University of Houston In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts By Barbara E. Liss December 1978 iv ABSTRACT A definition of ethnic identity as proposed by Barth and modified by Levy is presented. A group of twenty-three Soviet Jews, recently resettled in Houston, Texas, was investigated to determine whether they fulfill the requirements of ethnic identity as defined in this study. A description of Soviet Jews and an historical overview from before the 1917 Rev­ olution through contemporary times show the cultural changes that have occurred in Soviet Jewish life. Informal interviews with the immigrants provide the data for the evaluation of their ethnic identity. The data show that the Soviet Jews in this study have an ethnic identity as defined, based on the features of ascription and adoption of cultural symbols that are socially effective. v CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................... 1 Chapter I. THE CONCEPT OF ETHNIC IDENTITY ............ 3 Narroll's Definition Barth's Revision Literature Review of the Concept of Ethnic Identity Definition of Ethnic Identity Used in Study II. METHODS.................................... 16 Problem of the Closed Society Two Approaches to the Investi­ gation III. THE SOVIET JEWS............................ 23 Characteristics of the Subgroups The Soviet Jewish Migrant IV. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND .................... 32 Overview Before the Revolution of 1917 Lenin and the Jews 1917-1924 Stalin and the Jews 1924-1953 Krushchev and the Jews 1953-1964 Brezhnev and the Jews 1964- Implications of the Emigration Issue and the Jewish Question V. DATA PRESENTATION.......................... 54 Self-Ascription or Ascription Variable Cultural Forms—a Standard for Behavior Strategy and the Corporate Group vi VI. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS................ 69 Discussion of Data Conclusions LITERATURE CITED ............................... 87 vii INTRODUCTION The intention of this research is to put forth a definition of ethnic identity based on a modified ver­ sion of Barth's model and to investigate a unique group in the terms of this definition. The concept of ethnic identity will provide the framework in which to analyze whether the conditions of ethnic identity do or do not obtain for this particular group. In the past the study of ethnic groups primarily focused on the analysis of the shared cultural forms of the group members. The implications of this approach are that discrete boundaries separate one group from another and that an ethnic group is definable by a cul­ tural history that is continuous. This older ideal of ethnic identity, as that which distinguished one tribe from another, was useful when such populations were rel­ atively isolated from one another. In the contemporary world of intercommunication and movement of people from one place to another, this approach is no longer satis­ factory. When we look at ethnic groups that have emerged in the twentieth century, the flaws in such an analysis become evident. Ethnic groups in the modern world represent constructions of identity that are more dependent on cognitive, strategy-employing approaches 1 2 to group identification than on the culture-bearing aspects of cultural continuity. We see around us trans­ actions among groups that make the ethnic group a form of social organization. The area of concern for the groups is. What will be socially effective? The new identity of the ethnic group as described in the literature is based on a cognitive construction for both the individual and the group that uses tradi­ tional cultural symbols to define the group. Why and how people use such symbols is an important area of investigation if we are to understand what is going on in group interactions. This paper has two objectives. The first objec­ tive is to define the diacritica of the contemporary ethnic group. This will not be a new definition of ethnic identity, but, instead, an expansion of ideas already discussed in the literature of the ethnic group. The second objective of the study is to examine members of a group that historically and traditionally demon­ strated the culture-bearing attributes of the old "tribal" ethnic group. The Jewish people of pre-Soviet Russia constituted such a group. Today, in the Soviet Union these people generally have lost their traditional cultural symbols. Do they constitute an ethnic group according to the revised definition? I will try to answer this question using a small sample of Soviet Jewish immigrants who have recently resettled in Houston, Texas. CHAPTER I THE CONCEPT OF ETHNIC IDENTITY Narroll’s Definition The term "ethnic group" as presented by Narroll (1964) was at one time generally accepted as the mean­ ingful definition. The criteria used by Narroll to define the ethnic group were the following: 1) it was biologically self-perpetuating; 2) it shared fundamental cultural values that were expressed in unified cultural forms; 3) it shared a language; and 4) it had a member­ ship which identified itself and was identified by others as constituting a category distinguishable from other categories of the same order. The ascribed identity of the group resulted from an ancestry which shared cul­ tural values. The cultural forms were seen as particu­ lar behavioral traits, customs and patterns that embod­ ied the values and frequently created a social boundary around the group. At one time Narroll’s description was generally representative of many of the groups that were studied by anthropologists. Narroll’s definition is part of what Bennett (1975) calls the "old ethnicity." Although the substance of some of Narroll’s characteristics are 3 4 of value, the frame of reference is that a shared cul­ ture is the salient feature of the ethnic group. Barth's Revision It is Barth's (1969) revised definition that transformed the idea of ethnic identity into a cogni­ tive and behavioral-strategy frame. Barth views ethnic identity as a component of social participation. It is his rethinking in the study of ethnic groups that lays the groundwork for what has been called the "new eth­ nicity," and it is Barth's concept that provides the baseline for the definition that will be used in this paper. Barth believes that Narroll's definition of the ethnic group is too narrow to explain the phenomenon of ethnic identity in present day society and culture. Narroll's definition is of the ideal type and does not represent the ethnic group in the contemporary real world. Barth thinks that Narroll's concept of the eth­ nic group suffers from preconceived ideas of the signif­ icant factors in the origin, structure, and function of these groups. Furthermore, Barth is critical of the assumption that there are discrete boundaries around the group, for this implies that ethnic groups develop their cultural and social forms in relative isolation and can be described as separate entities. Finally, Narroll's emphasis on the idea of a shared common culture 5 places too much importance on cultural continuity, on the analysis of culture, rather than on ethnic organiza­ tion. For Barth, the sharing of a common culture is the result of the ethnic group, not its definitional charac­ teristic. Barth's emphasis is not on the cultural, but on what is socially effective. The ethnic group is a form of social organization. It is Narroll's criterion of self-ascription or ascription by others that Barth views as the critical fea­ ture of the ethnic group. By emphasizing ascription as the critical element, we can better understand how the identity of the group is maintained. The characteristic of self-ascription or ascription by others provides the boundary that defines the group. This boundary mainte­ nance among groups is Barth's main subject of inquiry. The boundary is a social one. It depends upon who is perceived to be "inside" and who is "outside" the group. Even though cultural features that define the boundary may change and the cultural characteristics of the mem­ bers within the group may become transformed, what re­ mains is the social identification of who is considered as part of the group and who is not. Membership in the group does not depend on how similar members may appear to be. What is significant is the individual's percep­ tion of belonging to a particular group. Barth's main concern is with the "marking off," the way social boundaries are maintained. He states. 6 "If a group maintains its identity when members inter­ act with others, this entails criteria for determining membership and ways of signalling membership and exclu­ sion" (1969 p.15). Within the boundary of the ethnic group is the prescription for behavior. Barth asserts that "ethnic groups only persist as significant units if they imply marked difference in behavior, i.e., per­ sisting cultural differences" (1969 pp.15-16). There­ fore, ethnic identity also delineates the kinds of roles a person may play, what statuses he may assume in group interactions. In Barth's analysis of inter-ethnic relations he focuses on what is needed to make ethnic distinctions emerge in a particular area.
Recommended publications
  • Soviet-Jewish Memory of the Second World War
    Courtesy of Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-J16133 Te Red and the Yellow Star: Soviet-Jewish Memory of the Second World War By Luisa Von Richthofen, Wellseley College June 1941 onwards, German troops invaded the ter- lite, order loving people”1 who had put an end to frequent ritories that had formerly been annexed by the Soviet anti-Jewish pogroms. In another ironical twist of history, Union. They rapidly encircled the main East European There was in those occupied territories of Eastern Eu- centers of Jewish population. Jews in those areas were rope only one significant group of Jews that miraculously unprepared for the campaign of mass murder that was just barely escaped the massacres. In fact only those who soon to take place. After the signing of the Molotov–Rib- had been deported to the Russian interior by the Soviets bentrop Pact in 1939, Soviet newspapers had kept silent about the National Socialist policy regarding the Jews in the German occupied territories. Despite terrible rumors about atrocities in the west brought by Jewish refugees fleeing to the districts occupied by the Soviet Union be- tween September 17 and the October 22, 1941 (before the borders between Eastern and Western Poland were shut down), many Jews chose to stay in German-occupied 1 Mordechai Altshuler, « Escape and evacuation of Soviet Jews territory even after the German–Soviet pact was broken. at the time of the Nazi invasion » in: Te Holocaust in the Soviet What motivated so many Jews not to flee eastwards were Union: Studies and sources on the destruction of the Jews in the memories of German occupation of Ukraine in 1917.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bolsheviks and War
    The Bolsheviks and War By Sam Marcy [1985] Lessons for today's anti-war movement Marxists Internet Archive The Bolsheviks and War – Lessons for Today’s Anti-war movement 2 The Bolsheviks and War – Lessons for Today’s Anti-war movement Introduction 5 I. The Bolsheviks and World War I 1. Social Democracy and the approaching war 9 2. Zimmerwald: The internationalists regroup 20 3. Lenin's response to the war 28 II. Lessons for Today's Anti-war Movement 4. Imperialism and the growth of opportunism 48 5. Class struggle in the nuclear age 67 6. The Green Corn Rebellion and the struggle for socialism 95 Appendices Appendix I: Stuttgart Resolution 124 Appendix II: Basel Manifesto 128 Appendix III: International Socialist Women's Conference(Berne) 135 Appendix IV: Zimmerwald Manifesto 138 Appendix V: Zimmerwald Declaration of sympathy 144 Appendix VI: Draft resolution from leftwing at Zimmerwald 146 Appendix VII: Draft Manifesto introduced at Zimmerwald 149 Appendix VIII: Two Declarations made at Zimmerwald 153 Appendix IX: War proclamation & program, Socialist Party(April, 1917) 155 Appendix X: Decree on Peace by Second All-Russia Congress of Soviets 162 3 The Bolsheviks and War – Lessons for Today’s Anti-war movement 4 The Bolsheviks and War – Lessons for Today’s Anti-war movement Introduction For those who wish to study more about the struggle against the frst imperialist world war, there are the classics written by Lenin at the time, including his Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism, and Socialism and War. These works are generally available in bookstores, particularly those specializing in Marxist literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Edelmann Florian
    ‘With one’s back to the wall?’ A Social Systems Theory Approach to the Comparative Study of Revolutionary Terrorism Florian Edelmann A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of International Politics Aberystwyth University 30 September 2016 103,920 19 January 2017 19 January 2017 19 January 2017 19 January 2017 Thesis Abstract This PhD thesis develops a complex, multi-layered conceptual framework and analytical strategy for approaching ‘clandestine political violence’ (della Porta 2013) from a thoroughly communicative perspective. More precisely, the thesis sets out to conceptualise how revolutionary identities are (re)produced in radical ‘discourse communities’ (Apter 1997b) by interpreting socio-political realities, constructing counter-memories, and establishing a semantics of ‘armed struggle’ to legitimise the use of violent means in non- revolutionary situations and pacified, democratic societies. Its theoretical framework builds on Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory (Luhmann 1995a, 1998, 2002a; Luhmann and Hellmann 1996) as well as on seminal work in social movement studies (Bosi and della Porta 2012; Caiani et al. 2012; della Porta 1995; Zwerman et al. 2000), social semiotics and critical discourse analysis (Fairclough 1995c; Fairclough et al. 2011; Halliday 1978b, 1985; Wodak 1989, 1996; Wodak and Meyer 2009). The project’s empirical chapters comparatively analyse the writings of two left-wing armed formations in late 20th century Germany and the ways in which these were perceived in the contemporary radical counter-public. Case studies are the ‘2nd of June Movement’ and the ‘Revolutionary Cells’, two German groups ‘in the shadow of the RAF’ (Kraushaar 2006b).
    [Show full text]
  • Disarmament Conference of the Soviet Public, February 15-16, 1960
    DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE OF THE SOVIET PUBLIC February 15-16, 1960, Moscow SPEECHES AND DOCUMENTS HX 632 A1 V19 NO,200 0jc MBBIS DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE OF THE SOVIET PUBLIC February 15-16, 1960, Moscow SPEECHES AND DOCUMENTS FOREIGN LANGUAGES PUBLISHING HOUSE Moscow 1960 - library OF ALBKTA CONTENTS Page Preface . 5 Report by N. S. Tikhonov. 8 Speech by V. V. Grishin.31 Speech by Y. G. Langad. 37 Speech by N. V. Popova ............ 40 Speech by A. V. Piushch.46 Speech by Y. K. Fyodorov ..49 Speech by N. I. Pirogov. 55 Speech by 1. G. Ehrenburg. 58 Speech by S. Yusifov.. 65 Speech by A. V. Topchiev.67 Speech by S. P. Pavlov.71 Speech by S. T. Konenkov .. 76 Speech by Y. I. Tolstikov . 79 Speech by Mirzo Tursun-zade. 82 Speech by K. V. Ostrovityanov ..85 Speech by A. 1. Kosei ..90 Speech by K. A. Meretskov. 94 Speech by M. 1. Kotov.97 Speech by L. I. Sedov.102 Speech by James Endicott.105 Speech by N. N. Blokhin.108 Speech by A. A. Vishnevsky ..........111 Speech by N. S. Guseva.115 Speech by M. V. Nesterov.119 Speech by S. K. Romanovsky.125 Speech by S. A. Kotova.129 Speech by Kaoru Yasui.. 132 Speech by G. A. Miterev 135 Speech by Alexius.138 1* 3 Speech by A. P. Klimov.140 Speech by V. M. Chkhikvadze.144 Speech by V. D. Kuznetsov.147 Speech by L. D. Priede-Berzii;ia.151 Speech by I. A. Kairov.154 Speech by N. A. Talensky.158 Speech by Albert Kahn.162 Speech by P.
    [Show full text]
  • UNION of SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS 1 MISSION to the UNITED NATIONS 21 Augus: ~ 136 EAST 67Th STREET
    PRESS· RELEASE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS 1 MISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS 21 Augus: ~ 136 EAST 67th STREET. NEW YORK 21, N.Y. 1 68 TASS STATEMENT TASS is authorized to state that party and government leaders of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic have asked the Soviet Union and other allied states to render the fraternal Czechaslovak people urgent assistance, including assistance with armed forces. This request was brought about by the threat which was arisen to the socialist system, eJ4 sting in Czechoslovakia, and to the statehood established by the constitution, the threat emanating from the counter­ revolutionary forces which have entered into a collusion with foreign forces hostile to so cia lis m. The events in Czecloslovakia and around her were repeatedly the subject of exchanges of views between leaders of fraternal socialist countries, including the leaders of Czechoslovakia. These countries are unanimous in that the sup­ port 1 consolidation and defence of the peoples' socialist gains is a common internationalist duty of all the socialist states. This common stand of theirs was solemnly proclaimed in the Bratislava statement. The further aggravation of the situation in Czechoslovakia affects the vital interests of the Soviet Union and other socialist states , the interests of the security of the states of the socialist community. The threat to the socialist system in Czechoslovakia constitutes at the same time a threat to the mainstays of European peace. The Soviet Government and the governments of the allied countries -­ the People 1 s Republic of Bulgaria, the Hungarian People 1 s Republic, the Germa.n Democratic Republic, the Polish People's Republic-- proceeding from the priri­ ciples of inseverable friendship and co-operation and in accordance with the existing contractual commitments 1 have decided to meet the above-mentioned requests for rendering necessary help to the fraternal Czechoslovak people.
    [Show full text]
  • European Writers in the Fascist Era
    Dreaming Empire: European Writers in the Fascist Era The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Kohen, Robert Dean. 2014. Dreaming Empire: European Writers in the Fascist Era. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12274497 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Dreaming Empire: European Writers in the Fascist Era A dissertation presented by Robert Dean Kohen to The Department of Comparative Literature in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Comparative Literature Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2014 © 2014 Robert Dean Kohen All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Professor Judith Ryan Robert Dean Kohen Dreaming Empire: European Writers in the Fascist Era Abstract This dissertation explores how literary writers from across Western and Central Europe—namely Germany, Italy, Britain and France—invoked Europe’s legacy of empire and colonialism in their attempt to come to terms with the specter of fascism. It argues that empire became the site upon which a wide range of writers built their critiques, sometimes overt and other times subvert, against a rising tide of fascist ideology in the 1930s and 1940s. What results is a condemningly critical—and in the case of writers publishing within fascist regimes, outright subversive—reading of fascism.
    [Show full text]
  • Episodes from the History of American-Soviet Cultural Relations: Stanford Slavic Studies, Volume 5 (1992)
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Faculty Publications 4-8-2020 Episodes from the History of American-Soviet Cultural Relations: Stanford Slavic Studies, Volume 5 (1992) Lazar Fleishman [email protected] Ronald D. LeBlanc (Translator) University of New Hampshire, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/faculty_pubs Recommended Citation Fleishman, Lazar, "Episodes from the History of American-Soviet Cultural Relations: Stanford Slavic Studies, Volume 5 (1992)," translated by LeBlanc, Ronald D. (2020). Faculty Publications. 790. https://scholars.unh.edu/faculty_pubs/790 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lazar Fleishman Episodes from the History of American-Soviet Cultural Relations Stanford Slavic Studies, Volume 5 (1992) translated by Ronald D. LeBlanc 1 Author’s Foreword The present volume may be viewed as an idiosyncratic sequel to the book, Russkii Berlin [Russian Berlin], which I – along with Olga Raevskaia-Hughes and Robert Hughes – prepared for publication and then published in 1983. It grows directly out of the work that was begun by the three of us at that time (work that I recall with a feeling of ardent gratitude) and is likewise based entirely upon materials on Russian literature and culture that are housed in a single, but extraordinarily valuable, collection – the archive of the Hoover Institution. As was true in that earlier case, this archive consists of materials that outwardly appear to be heterogeneous, materials, furthermore, that relate to what are decidedly divergent stages in the history of Russian culture – the prerevolutionary stage in the first section (the “Gorky” section) and the Soviet stage in the second section.
    [Show full text]
  • The Negro Nation
    Harry Haywood: The Negro Nation The following is Chapter VII of Harry Haywood‘s 1948 book, Negro Liberation. In the struggle against the plantation system of the South, the Negro people are necessarily the chief driving force. The liberal “remedies” which shy away from the fundamental economic changes indispensable for the democratic transformation of the South, ignore this crucial fact and, with it, they ignore the special character of the social and political struggle of the Negroes. The Myth of Race The “white supremacists” insist on presenting the Negro question as one of race. This makes it possible for them to “justify” the notorious color-caste system in the name of spurious race dogmas which depict the Negros servile status in American life, not as the result of man-imposed Harry Haywood, 1948 prescription, but as a condition fixed by nature. Negro inequality is supposedly due to natural inherent differences. In this credo, Negroes presumably are a lower form of organism, mentally primitive and emotionally undeveloped. “Keeping the Negro in his place” is thus allegedly prescribed by nature and fixed by Holy Writ. Color of skin is made an index to social position. Race, a strictly limited biological concept, becomes a social factor and used as an instrument for perpetuating and intensifying Negro subjugation. The Negro problem is explained in terms of natural conflict between races, the result of inborn peculiarities. This hideous distortion, whose roots go back into ante-bellum times and beyond, permeates the entire cultural pattern of the South; this vile calumny is fixed in the South’s folkways, mores and customs, sanctioned in its laws, and, in the last analysis buttressed by violence and lynch terror.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Ukrainian Studies
    JOURNAL OF UKRAINIAN STUDIES Summer -Winter 1996 CONTRIBUTORS: GUEST EDITOR: Stefania Szlek Miller Stefania Szlek Miller John S. Reshetar, Jr. Mykola Riabchouk Paul Robert Magocsi laroslav Isaievych John-Paul Himka Henry Abramson Julian Birch Bohdan Harasymiw Zenovia A. Sochor Steven Rosefielde Andrea Chandler Liu Dong Zhao Yunzhong Howard Aster Journal of UKRAINIAN STUDIES Volume 21, Numbers 1-2 Summer-Winter 1996 Ukraine: Developing a Democratic Polity Essays in Honour of Peter J. Potichnyj Contributors Guest Editor Stefania Szlek Miller Stefania Szlek Miller John S. Reshetar, Jr. Mykola Riabchouk Paul Robert Magocsi laroslav Isaievych John-Paul Himka Henry Abramson Julian Birch Bohdan Harasymiw Zenovia A. Sochor Steven Rosefielde Andrea Chandler Liu Dong Zhao Yunzhong Howard Aster EDITOR Roman Senkus Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Editorial Board Zenon E. Kohut, David R. Marples, Marusia K. Petryshyn, Danylo Husar Struk, Frances Swyripa, Frank E. Sysyn, Maxim Tarnawsky Journal of Ukrainian Studies Advisory Board Olga Andriewsky (Trent University Peterborough, Ontario), L'ubica Babotova (Presov University), laroslav Hrytsak (Institute of Historical Studies, Lviv State University), Heorhii Kasianov (Institute of the History of Ukraine, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv), Bohdan Krawchenko (Institute of Public Administration and Local Government, Kyiv), Marko Pavlyshyn (Monash University, Melbourne), Myroslav Shkandrij (University of Manitoba, Winnipeg) The Journal of Ukrainian Studies is published semiannually by the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta, 352 Athabasca Hall, Edmonton, Alta., T6G 2E8, Canada. Telephone: (403) 492- 2972; fax: (403) 492-4967; e-mail: [email protected]. Annual subscriptions are $26.75 (GST inch) for individuals and $37.45 (GST inch) for libraries and institutions in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the British Idealist Theory of Rights: the Younger Generation of British Idealists and Their Internationalist Approach to Human Rights
    NAZLI PINAR NAZLI KAYMAZ THEIR INTERNATIONALIST RIGHTS APPROACH HUMAN TO THEIR INTERNATIONALIST THE YOUNGER GENERATION OF AND BRITISH GENERATION YOUNGER IDEALISTS THE REVISITING THE BRITISH IDEALIST THEORY OF RIGHTS: THEORY OF THE BRITISH IDEALIST REVISITING REVISITING THE BRITISH IDEALIST THEORY OF RIGHTS: THE YOUNGER GENERATION OF BRITISH IDEALISTS AND THEIR INTERNATIONALIST APPROACH TO HUMAN RIGHTS A Ph.D. Dissertation by NAZLI PINAR KAYMAZ Department of Political Science and Public Administration İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara September 2018 Bilkent University 2018 University Bilkent To all those who came before me REVISITING THE BRITISH IDEALIST THEORY OF RIGHTS: THE YOUNGER GENERATION OF BRITISH IDEALISTS AND THEIR INTERNATIONALIST APPROACH TO HUMAN RIGHTS The Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by NAZLI PINAR KAYMAZ In Partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2018 ABSTRACT REVISITING THE BRITISH IDEALIST THEORY OF RIGHTS: THE YOUNGER GENERATION OF BRITISH IDEALISTS AND THEIR INTERNATIONALIST APPROACH TO HUMAN RIGHTS Kaymaz, Nazlı Pınar Ph. D. Department of Political Science and Public Administration Supervisor: Assist. Prof. Dr. John James Alexander September 2018 This dissertation aims to put forward a historical account of the younger generation of British Idealists’ approach to international relations and human rights. By focusing on pre-Great War and post-Great War periods it reveals the shift that occurred in their approbation of T. H. Green’s theory of rights. It argues that the Great War served as a deterrent for the younger generation of British Idealists, as it did for other liberal British intellectuals, from perceiving the empire as a plausible and/or sustainable international order.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations
    United Nations Monday, 19 October 1976, TWENTY-FIFTH SESSION at 3 pm. COMMEMORATIVE SESSION 0flci.d Record.9 14 to 24 October 1970” NRW YORK CONTENTS 4. But how can we talk about peace, about human solidarity or the spirit of world-wide internationalism which is the United Nations motivating force, without Agenda item 2 1: Celebration of the twenty-fifth anniversary of the United turning our thoughts to the man the outstanding person- Nations (~,tti/z//erl) nage who, for the last nine years, has guided the Speech by Mr. Courmo Barcougn6, Minister for Foreign destinies of our Organization? His passionate devotion Affairs and Special Envoy of the Presidint of the to and abiding concern for peace, his courage and Republic of the Niger , . , . Speech by General SangoulC Lamizana, President of the tenacity, his patience and calm sense of order make Republic of the Upper Volta.. , . , *,, , . , . , , our Secretary-General, U Thant, the ideal man to cope Speech by the Honourable Chief Leabua Jonathan, Prime with the complex situations besetting our anguished Minister of the Kingdom of Lesotho , , , . , . , . world. Speech by Mr. Abdul Kayeum, Deputy Prime Minister and Special Envoy of the Government of Afghanistan 5. The people of Niger, for their part, will not soon Speech by Mr. Cheng Heng, Head of State of Cambodia Speech by His Highness Prince SouvannaPhouma, Prime forget the last time he visited Niamey. Through my Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs of Laos. words they render a warm tribute to that man of action, Speech by His Highness Prince Makhosini, Prime Minis- whose steadfast faith in the future of the countries ter of the Kingdom of Swaziland *...**,.....,..
    [Show full text]
  • Politics and Society in Soviet Ukraine 1953-1980
    OUTICS AND SOCIETY H BORYS LEWYTZKYJ The author of numerous books and scholarly articles, Borys Lewytzkyj is an established authority on Soviet affairs. Born in Vienna in 1915, he became well known as a publicist and journalist as chief editor of the newspaper Nove Selo (1936-9) in Lviv. During the Second World War, he was active in the Ukrainian Democratic Revolutionary Party (UDRP), led by Ivan Mitringa, which took part in the resistance movement against the German occupants. Emigrating to Munich after the war, Dr. Lewytzkyj became joint-editor of the UDRP organ Vpered from 1949 to 1956, contributing a variety of articles about contemporary life in the USSR. Since 1952, he has supplied informa¬ tion to the West German Social Democratic Party about Soviet affairs. Dr. Lewytzkyj has his own private research bureau in Munich. Continued on back flap POLITICS AND SOCIETY IN SOVIET UKRAINE 1953-1980 Borys Lewytzkyj Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies University of Alberta Edmonton 1984 Copyright ® 1984 Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Second Printing, 1987 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Lewytzkyj, Borys. Politics and society in Soviet Ukraine, 1953-80 (The Canadian library in Ukrainian studies) Includes index. ISBN 0-920862-31-4 (bound). — ISBN 0-920862-33-0 (pbk.) 1. Ukraine—Politics and government—1917- 2. Ukraine—Social conditions. I. Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies. II. Title. III. Series. DK508.8.L49 1984 947\71085 C83-091489-7 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]