Our Gay Interview with Joseph Gordon-Levitt
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sexual Orientation and the Federal Workplace
SEXUAL ORIENTATION and the FEDERAL WORKPLACE Policy and Perception A Report to the President and Congress of the United States by the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board MAY 2014 THE CHAIRMAN U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 1615 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20419-0001 The President President of the Senate Speaker of the House of Representatives Dear Sirs: In accordance with the requirements of 5 U.S.C. § 1204(a)(3), it is my honor to submit this U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) report, Sexual Orientation and the Federal Workplace: Policy and Perception. The purpose of our study was to examine Federal employee perceptions of workplace treatment based on sexual orientation, review how Federal workplace protections from sexual orientation discrimination evolved, and determine if further action is warranted to communicate or clarify those protections. Since 1980, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management has interpreted the tenth Prohibited Personnel Practice (5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(10)), which bars discrimination in Federal personnel actions based on conduct that does not adversely affect job performance, to prohibit sexual orientation discrimination. As this prohibition has neither been specifically expressed in statute nor affirmed in judicial decision, it has been subject to alternate interpretations. Executive Order 13087 prohibited sexual orientation discrimination in Federal employment but provided no enforceable rights or remedies for Federal employees who allege they are the victims of sexual orientation discrimination. Any ambiguity in the longstanding policy prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination in the Federal workplace would be resolved by legislation making that prohibition explicit. Such legislation could grant Federal employees who allege they are victims of sexual orientation discrimination access to the same remedies as those who allege discrimination on other bases. -
The Invention of Bad Gay Sex: Texas and the Creation of a Criminal Underclass of Gay People
The Invention of Bad Gay Sex: Texas and the Creation of a Criminal Underclass of Gay People Scott De Orio Journal of the History of Sexuality, Volume 26, Number 1, January 2017, pp. 53-87 (Article) Published by University of Texas Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/645006 Access provided by University of Michigan @ Ann Arbor (3 Sep 2018 18:29 GMT) The Invention of Bad Gay Sex: Texas and the Creation of a Criminal Underclass of Gay People SCOTT DE ORIO University of Michigan T HE RECEN T PROGRESS IN T HE area of lesbian and gay rights in the United States has occasioned a good deal of triumphalism.1 Many ac- counts, both scholarly and popular, have not only celebrated the rise of lesbian and gay rights under the Obama administration but also described what appears—at least in retrospect—to have been their steady, surprising, and inexorable expansion since the 1970s. According to that conventional narrative, lesbians and gay men have slowly but surely gained ever-greater access to full citizenship in many spheres of life.2 I would like to thank Tiffany Ball, Roger Grant, David Halperin, Courtney Jacobs, Matt Lassiter, Stephen Molldrem, Gayle Rubin, Doug White, the participants in the American History Workshop at the University of Michigan, Lauren Berlant and the participants in the 2015 Engendering Change conference at the University of Chicago, and Annette Timm and the two anonymous reviewers from the Journal of the History of Sexuality for their feedback on drafts of this essay. The Rackham Graduate School and the Eisenberg Institute for His- torical Studies, both at the University of Michigan, provided financial support for the project. -
Gay Political Activism in Washington, DC, 1961-1973 Peter Bonds James Madison University
James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Spring 2016 Stonewall on the Potomac: Gay political activism in Washington, DC, 1961-1973 Peter Bonds James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Bonds, Peter, "Stonewall on the Potomac: Gay political activism in Washington, DC, 1961-1973" (2016). Masters Theses. 455. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/455 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stonewall on the Potomac: Gay Political Activism in Washington, DC, 1961-1973 Peter Bonds A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History May 2016 FACULTY COMMITTEE: Committee Chair: Dr. Evan Friss Committee Members/ Readers: Dr. Emily Westkaemper Dr. Christian Davis Acknowledgements This work would not have been possible without the tremendous help I received from the Historical Society of Washington, and Philip Clark of its Rainbow History Project. In addition, I owe a debt of gratitude to Paul Kuntzler, who was kind enough to let me interview him about his years of experience on the front lines of gay political activism in Washington, DC. Finally, thank you to my incredible friends and family, Ashley, Anthony, Bruce, Cameron, Karl, Kyle, Michael, Patrick, Mom, Dad, and Andrew, I would never have finished this without your love and support. -
Romer V. Evans and Invidious Intent
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 6 (1997-1998) Issue 1 Article 3 December 1997 Romer v. Evans and Invidious Intent Andrew Koppelman [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Fourteenth Amendment Commons Repository Citation Andrew Koppelman, Romer v. Evans and Invidious Intent, 6 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 89 (1997), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol6/iss1/3 Copyright c 1997 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj SYMPOSIUM: ROMER v. EVANS* ROMER v. EVANS AND INVIDIOUS INTENT Andrew Koppelman'" In this Essay, ProfessorKoppelman argues that, notwithstanding numerous scholarly claims to the contrary, the Supreme Court's decision in Romer v. Evans was based on the invalidated law's impermissible purpose. ProfessorKoppelman examines the Court's understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment, and concludes that its current doctrine is designed to ferret out unconstitutional intent. Such impermissible intent, Koppelman argues, was evident in the law challenged in Romer. Nonetheless, Koppelman acknowledges, Romer is a hard case, and its precedentialsignificance is unclear, particularly in light of Bowers v. Hardwick, which upheld the constitutionality of laws against homosexual sodomy. Laws that facially disadvantage gays, he argues, will always reflect both impermissible prejudice and permissible moral judge- ments. I. INTRODUCTION Laws that discriminate against gays will always be demonstrably rational, because such laws will always further the state's legitimate moral objection to homosexual sodomy. Thus teaches Bowers v. -
Developing Law on LGBT Rights in the Workplace
Developing Law on LGBT Rights in the Workplace American Bar Association, Labor and Employment Law Section: National Conference on Equal Employment Opportunity Law 2015 Lisa J. Banks1 Matthew S. Stiff Sam Kramer KATZ, MARSHALL & BANKS, LLP 1718 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Sixth Floor Washington, D.C. 20009 (202) 299-1140 www.kmblegal.com 1 Lisa J. Banks is a founding partner with Katz, Marshall & Banks, LLP, a civil rights firm based in Washington, D.C., that specializes in the representation of plaintiffs in employment law, whistleblower, civil rights and civil liberties matters. Matthew S. Stiff is a partner with the Firm. Sam Kramer is an associate with the firm. © Copyright 2015, Lisa J. Banks, Katz, Marshall & Banks, LLP, Washington, D.C. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 II. LGBT Demographics and the Pervasiveness of LGBT Workplace Discrimination ....... 3 III. Constitutional Protections for LGBT Employees ............................................................... 4 A. Romer v. Evans ............................................................................................................... 5 B. Lawrence v. Texas .......................................................................................................... 7 C. United States v. Windsor ............................................................................................... 9 D. Obergefell v. Hodges ................................................................................................... -
Vol. 86 Tuesday No. 49 March 16, 2021 Pages 14363–14524
Vol. 86 Tuesday No. 49 March 16, 2021 Pages 14363–14524 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Sep 11 2014 17:59 Mar 15, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\16MRWS.LOC 16MRWS jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with FR_WS II Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 16, 2021 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, under the Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) Subscriptions: and the regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Government Publishing Office, is the exclusive distributor of the official edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general (Toll-Free) applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published FEDERAL AGENCIES by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions: Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Email [email protected] issuing agency requests earlier filing. -
2021.03.16 FGG Equality Act Testimony
Statement for the Record from the National Women’s Law Center Submitted by Fatima Goss Graves, President and CEO U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary Hearing on the Equality Act – March 17, 2021 Dear Chairman Durbin, Ranking Member Grassley, and Members of the Committee: The National Women’s Law Center submits this statement for the record in support of the passage of the Equality Act. The Center has worked for more than 45 years to advance and protect women’s equality and opportunity, and to remove barriers for all who face sex discrimination including at work, in schools or in healthcare, including LGBTQ individuals. NWLC fights for gender justice – in the courts, in public policy, and in our society – working across the issues that are central to the lives of women and girls, including child care and early learning, education, reproductive rights and health, income security, workplace justice, and addressing sexual harassment or assault. Since the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other key civil rights protections, through the courage of individuals coming forward with claims of discrimination, often risking retaliation, we have expanded and deepened our understanding of the wrongs against which our civil rights laws protect, including protection against sexual harassment, pregnancy discrimination, and same-sex harassment. These efforts to address discrimination through civil rights laws are critical alongside organizing efforts, culture change through the media and other strategies for social change. The Equality Act would reflect and affirm existing court rulings, as confirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Bostock v. -
Will 2016 Be a Year Of
Complete Event Calendar W RLD Local 'American Idol’ Alum To Sing AIDS At World AIDS Day Detroit DAY Will 2016 Be A Year Of November 26, 2015 An Open Letter To Dana The Charlie Sheen Joe Jonas Talks Gay Nessel From Michigan's Moment You Probably Clubs And Making VOL. 2348 | FREE Transgender Community Missed Music WWW.PRIDESOURCE.COM PAGE 14 PAGE 28 PAGE 30 URGING RESTRAINT WORLD AIDS DAY W RLD ‘Art AIDS America’ reveals remaining NEWS AIDS stigma 8 Eight Michigan companies earn highest marks for LGBT policies 10 Three LGBT orgs appoint new leadership DAY 11 Michigan Court of Appeals reverses custody ruling for lesbian parents’ case 12 Homicides of transgender women in US reach alarming high WORLD AIDS DAY GUIDE 13 ACLU says Kentucky clerk should have to Michigan transgender community reissue licenses 18 Viewpoint: Getting to zero and dealing with stigma appeals to Dana Nessel on ballot OPINION 20 Analysis: It’s time to retire the medical initiative 12 Creep of the Week: Peter Sprigg category of AIDS See page 14 14 Is a referendum the answer? See page 22 14 An open letter to Dana Nessel from 20 Study explores healthy old age for the state’s transgender community those with HIV 15 Transmissions: The next day 22 ‘Art AIDS America’ reveals remaining ENTERTAINMENT 16 Parting Glances stigma A lot of guys come out 16 Op Ed: The end of HIV is near... to the shows – some gay guys 24 ‘American Idol’ alum/Metro Detroit native to 17 The season to give thanks and “ as well – and I love that. -
Testimony of AAG Thomas E. Perez Re: EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT ENSURING OPPORTUNITY for ALL AMERICANS
STATEMENT OF THOMAS E. PEREZ ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR AND PENSIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ENTITLED “EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT: ENSURING OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL AMERICANS” PRESENTED NOVEMBER 5, 2009 Statement of Thomas E. Perez Assistant Attorney General Department of Justice Before the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions United States Senate At a Hearing Entitled “Employment Non-Discrimination Act: Ensuring Opportunity for All Americans” November 5, 2009 Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Enzi and members of the HELP Committee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. It is a privilege to represent the Obama Administration and the Department of Justice at this hearing to consider the Employment Non- Discrimination Act (ENDA), and to voice the Administration’s strong support for fully-inclusive legislation that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. The Civil Rights Division, which I have the great honor to lead, serves as the conscience of the federal government. Our mission is clear: to uphold and protect the civil and constitutional rights of all Americans, particularly some of the most vulnerable among us. We seek to advance this Nation’s long struggle to embrace the principle so eloquently captured by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., that persons should be judged based on “content of their character,” and not on their race, color, sex, national origin, religion or any other irrelevant factors. Our civil rights laws – laws enforced by the Civil Rights Division – reflect and uphold this noble principle. Just last month Congress passed and the President made history when he signed the first federal law that provides civil rights protections to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) individuals. -
The Lavender Scare: Persecution of Lesbianism During the Cold War
Western Illinois Historical Review © 2013 Vol. V, Spring 2013 ISSN 2153-1714 The Lavender Scare: Persecution of Lesbianism During the Cold War Jessica Toops The Cold War era of the 1950s is often connected with the “Red Scare” and the idea that the spread of communism must be stopped no matter the cost. People remember the persecution that those who were suspected of being affiliated with the Communist Party faced. What is often forgotten within textbooks is something that many refer to as the “Lavender Scare,” which was the fear that homosexuals had infiltrated the government and that they were spreading their influence throughout the United States. Persecution of female homosexuals was pervasive during this time. The Lavender Scare had detrimental effects on lesbians, such as the loss of jobs, military status, social status, and isolation from society. However, the attempts to rid American society of the “disease” of lesbianism, especially in the government, military, and entertainment industries, actually led to the establishment of a lesbian subculture, which was much stronger than it had ever been, and which would eventually be instrumental in the later movement for equal rights for homosexuals. That being said, the social isolation and discrimination experienced by all lesbian women often had severely detrimental effects on their mental and emotional health, so even if they were not directly persecuted by the Lavender Scare, they all suffered from its prejudice. In order to understand the perception of lesbianism in the fifties and its effect on lesbian women, it is important to understand opinions about lesbianism from earlier decades and how they evolved. -
Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 20/Friday, January 30, 2015
5246 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 20 / Friday, January 30, 2015 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF LABOR • Mail: Debra A. Carr, Director, subcontractors and federally assisted Division of Policy, Planning, and construction contractors and Office of Federal Contract Compliance Program Development, Office of Federal subcontractors must meet in fulfilling Programs Contract Compliance Programs, Room their obligations under Executive Order C–3325, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., 11246, as amended, to ensure 41 CFR Part 60–20 Washington, DC 20210. nondiscrimination in employment on Receipt of submissions will not be the basis of sex and to take affirmative [01 14 15 OFCCP] acknowledged; however, the sender may action to ensure that applicants are request confirmation that a submission RIN 1250–AA05 employed, and that employees are has been received by telephoning treated during employment, without Discrimination on the Basis of Sex OFCCP at (202) 693–0104 (voice) or regard to their sex. The OFCCP is (202) 693–1337 (TTY) (these are not toll- charged with enforcing Executive Order AGENCY: Office of Federal Contract free numbers). 11246, as amended (‘‘Executive Order’’), Compliance Programs, Labor. All comments received, including any which prohibits covered Federal ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. personal information provided, will be Government contractors and available for public inspection during subcontractors and federally assisted SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of normal business hours at Room C–3325, construction contractors and Labor’s (‘‘DOL’’) Office of Federal 200 Constitution Avenue NW., subcontractors (‘‘contractors’’) from Contract Compliance Programs Washington, DC 20210, or via the (‘‘OFCCP’’) is proposing regulations that discriminating in employment on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. -
Lgbtq Public History: Reports from the Field
LGBTQ PUBLIC HISTORY: REPORTS FROM THE FIELD A digital publication from the Public History Commons of the National Council on Public History Nicole Belolan, ed., with Sarah Case, October 2019 In collaboration with “Queering Public History: The State of the Field,” The Public Historian, 41, no. 2 (May 2019), edited by Melinda Maria Jetté TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 The Jewel in the Buckle: 27 // NICOLE BELOLAN A Case Study of LGBTQ History in Columbia, South Carolina // CARRIE GIAUQUE Out of the LGBTIQ Collecting Closet: 4 The Don Kelly Research Collection of Gay Literature and Culture at Texas A&M Queer COLA Oral History and Digital Archives 32 // REBECCA HANKINS AND MIGUEL JUÁREZ // TRAVIS WAGNER AND JOSHUA WHITFIELD Stonewall: Riot, Rebellion, Activism and Identity 36 Voices from the Pulpit and Pew: 10 // CHRISTOPHER GIOIA Developing a Collaborative, Intentional LGBTQ Records Collecting Initiative Interpreting Pulse: Engaging Community 39 at the Presbyterian Historical Society Interpretations of Tragedy //CONNIE L. LESTER, PATRICIA CARLTON, AND SARA RAFFEL // BETH SHALOM HESSEL AND NANCY J. TAYLOR “Love is Love is Love is Love”: 45 Uncovering the Lavender Scare: 13 Collecting and Exhibiting Orlando’s LGBTQ History Challenges and Opportunities after the Pulse Nightclub Massacre // JUDITH ADKINS // EMILIE S. ARNOLD “Unlawfully and Wickedly”: 17 About the Contributors 53 Tracing Queer Presence through Copyright 2019 by the National Council on Public History Prison and Court Records A digital publication of the Public History Commons as part of “Queering Public History: The State of the Field” in collaboration with The // ANNIE ANDERSON Public Historian. This work is published under a Creative Commons The William & Mary LGBTIQ Research Project: 23 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) unported license Documenting the LGBTIQ Past in Virginia Cover photograph from Emilie S.