Florida's Fluoridation Status of Community Water Systems and Population Served, 2017
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator. -
NVD-A211) Detailed City Coverage by State
Smart Map Pro DVD Version 2.0 (NVD-A211) Detailed City Coverage By State Gilbert American Canyon Alabama: Glendale Anaheim Goodyear Angwin Argo Guadalupe Antelope Bessemer Higley Antelope Acres Birmingham Laveen Antioch Brighton Liberty Apple Valley Brookside Litchfield Park Aptos Brookwood Luke Air Force Base Arcadia Cardiff Marana Arlanza County Line Mesa Arlington Fairfield Oro Valley Arlington Station Fultondale Paradise Valley Arnold Heights Gardendale Peoria Aromas Graysville Phoenix Arrowhead Highlands Homewood Queen Creek Arrowhead Springs Hoover Rio Verde Arroyo Grande Hueytown Scottsdale Artesia Huntsville Sedona Ashland Irondale South Tucson Asti Kimberly Sun City Atascadero Leeds Sun City West Athens Lipscomb Sun Lakes Atherton Maytown Surprise Atwater Midfield Tempe Atwood Morris Tolleson Aurant Mountain Brook Tucson Avalon Mulga Waddell Avon North Johns Youngtown Azusa Northport Bahia Pleasant Grove California: Bakersfield Sumiton Balboa Island Sylvan Springs Acton Baldwin Park Tarrant Adelanto Banning Trafford Agoura Bardsdale Trussville Agoura Hills Barona Tuscaloosa Agua Caliente Batavia Vance Agua Dulce Bay Farm Island Vestavia Heights Alameda Bay Park Warrior Alamo Beaumont West Jefferson Albany Bel Air Aldercroft Heights Bel Marin Keys Arizona: Alhambra Bell Aliso Viejo Bell Gardens Apache Junction Allendale Bellflower Avondale Allied Gardens Belmont Carefree Alpine Belmont Shore Cave Creek Alpine Heights Belvedere Chandler Alta Loma Belvedere Heights Chandler Heights Altadena Belvedere-Tiburon El Mirage Alum Rock -
Habitat Use by and Dispersal of Snail Kites in Florida During Drought Conditions
HABITAT USE BY AND DISPERSAL OF SNAIL KITES IN FLORIDA DURING DROUGHT CONDITIONS STEVENR. BEISSINGERAND JEANE. TAKEKAWA School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 and Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Rt. 1, Box 278, Boynton Beach, Florida 33437. Although originally ranging over most of peninsular Florida (Howell 1932), Snail (Everglade) Kites (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus) have been restricted in recent years mostly to three areas in southern Florida: the western marshes of Lake Okeecho- bee; Conservation Area (CA) 3A; and CA2 (Sykes 1978, 1979, 1983). Severe drought in southern Florida in 1981 dried nearly all wetlands inhabited by kites. Water levels at Lake Okeechobee were at record lows (2.9 m msl) in July and August, drying 99% of the wetland area. Water remained about 1.5 m below scheduled levels until June 1982 when it quickly rose as a result of heavy summer rains. Only perimeter canals contained surface water from May- August 1981 in CA3A and March-August 1981 in CA2 when Tropi- cal Storm Dennis (16-19 August) replenished surface water sup- plies. After reaching scheduled levels in September 1981, water de- creased again until CA2 dried out in February and CA3A in early May 1982. In late May 1982, surface water rose quickly again to near normal levels. As a result of habitat unavailability caused by this drought, Snail Kites dispersed throughout the Florida peninsula in search of foraging habitats with apple snails (Ponzacea paludosa) , practically their sole source of food (for exceptions see Sykes and Kale 1974, Woodin and Woodin 1981, Takekawa and Beissinger 1983, Beis- singer in prep.). -
Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis
Putnam County COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSERVATION ELEMENT EAR-based Amendments Putnam County 2509 Crill Avenue, Suite 300 Palatka, FL 32178 Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis Putnam County Conservation Element Table of Contents Section Page I. Introduction 4 II. Inventory of Natural Resources 5 A. Surface Water Resources 5 1. Lakes and Prairies 5 2. Rivers and Creeks 8 3. Water Quality 10 4. Surface Water Improvement and Management Act (SWIM) 15 5. Analysis of Surface Water Resources 16 B. Groundwater Resources 17 1. Aquifers 17 2. Recharge Areas 18 3. Cones of Influence 18 4. Contaminated Well Sites 18 5. Alternate Sources of Water Supply 19 6. Water Needs and Sources 21 7. Analysis of Groundwater Resources 22 C. Wetlands 23 1. General Description of Wetlands 23 2. Impacts to Wetlands 25 3. Analysis of Wetlands 26 D. Floodplains 26 1. National Flood Insurance Program 26 2. Drainage Basins 26 3. Flooding 29 4. Analysis of Floodplains 30 E. Fisheries, Wildlife, Marine Habitats, and Vegetative Communities 30 1. Fisheries 30 2. Vegetative Communities 30 3. Environmentally Sensitive Lands 35 4. Wildlife Species 55 5. Marine Habitat 57 6. Analysis of Environmentally Sensitive Lands 58 F. Air Resources 58 1. Particulate Matter (PM) 58 2. Sulfur Dioxide 59 3. Nitrogen Oxides 60 4. Total Reduced Sulfur Compounds 60 5. Other Pollutants 61 6. Analysis of Air Resources 61 EAR-based Amendments 10/26/10 E-1 Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis G. Areas Known to Experience Soil Erosion 62 1. Potential for Erosion 62 2. Analysis of Soil Erosion 64 H. -
Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor
VOLUME I Executive Summary and Main Report Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation January 2004 Disclaimer: This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation solely in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof, nor does it express any opinion whatsoever on the merit or desirability of the project(s) described herein. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Any trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Note: In an effort to better inform the public, this document contains references to a number of Internet web sites. Web site locations change rapidly and, while every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of these references as of the date of publication, the references may prove to be invalid in the future. Should an FRA document prove difficult to find, readers should access the FRA web site (www.fra.dot.gov) and search by the document’s title or subject. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FRA/RDV-04/02 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2004 Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor⎯Volume I 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors: 8. Performing Organization Report No. For the engineering contractor: Michael C. Holowaty, Project Manager For the sponsoring agency: Richard U. Cogswell and Neil E. Moyer 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. -
Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County -
RCED-98-151 Intercity Passenger Rail B-279203
United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Committees May 1998 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes GAO/RCED-98-151 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-279203 May 14, 1998 The Honorable Richard C. Shelby Chairman The Honorable Frank R. Lautenberg Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Transportation Committee on Appropriations United States Senate The Honorable Frank R. Wolf Chairman The Honorable Martin Olav Sabo Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Transportation and Related Agencies Committee on Appropriations House of Representatives Since it began operations in 1971, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) has never been profitable and has received about $21 billion in federal subsidies for operating and capital expenses. In December 1994, at the direction of the administration, Amtrak established the goal of eliminating its need for federal operating subsidies by 2002. However, despite efforts to control expenses and improve efficiency, Amtrak has only reduced its annual net loss from $834 million in fiscal year 1994 to $762 million in fiscal year 1997, and it projects that its net loss will grow to $845 million this fiscal year.1 Amtrak remains heavily dependent on substantial federal operating and capital subsidies. Given Amtrak’s continued dependence on federal operating subsidies, the Conference Report to the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1998 directed us to examine the financial (1) performance of Amtrak’s current routes, (2) implications for Amtrak of multiyear capital requirements and declining federal operating subsidies, and (3) effect on Amtrak of reforms contained in the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997. -
Volunteer Fire Departments in Florida
Volunteer Fire Departments in Florida • Cross Creek Volunteer Fire Department • Brooker Volunteer Fire Department • Hampton Volunteer Fire Department • Heilbronn Springs Volunteer Fire Department • Lawtey Volunteer Fire Department • New River Volunteer Fire Department • Sampson City Volunteer Fire Department • Theressa Volunteer Fire Department • Merritt Island Volunteer Fire Department • Altha Volunteer Fire Department • Scotts Ferry Volunteer Fire Department • Alligator Point Volunteer Fire Department • Carrabelle Volunteer Fire Department • Eastpoint Volunteer Fire Department • St. George Island Volunteer Fire Department • Chattahoochee Volunteer Fire Department • Concord Volunteer Fire Department • Lakeport Volunteer Fire Department • Moore Haven Volunteer Fire Department • Muse Volunteer Fire Department • Ortona Volunteer Fire Department • Buckhead Ridge Volunteer Fire Department • Greensboro Volunteer Fire Department • Gretna Volunteer Fire Department • Havana Volunteer Fire Department • Midway Volunteer Fire Department • Mt. Pleasant Volunteer Fire Department • St. Johns Volunteer Fire Department • Sycamore Volunteer Fire Department • Wetumpka Volunteer Fire Department • Dalkeith Volunteer Fire Department • Gulf County Beaches Fire Volunteer Fire Department • Highland View Volunteer Fire Department • Howard Creek Volunteer Fire Department • Overstreet Volunteer Fire Department • Port St. Joe Volunteer Fire Department • South Gulf County Volunteer Fire Department • Stone Mill Creek Volunteer Fire Department • Wetappo Creek Volunteer -
Lake Michigan
BALLARD SUFFIELD SUFFIELD PRAIRIE E GREENWOOD HARRER N R LEHIGH GREENWOOD DAWES M E GREENWOOD G I VIEW R L M E P W PARK R PARK ENFIELD EWING V A E BIRCH DEMPSTER KEELER A L LAMON BRONX H MENARD MANGO CENTRAL LOCKWOOD U MAJOR KILDARE AUSTIN LOWELL L MASON MANSFIELD PARKSIDE LARAMIE LE CLAIRE MEADE MARMORA KNOX KOLMAR KENTON A KILPATRICK BURNHAM PARK SKOKIE SAYRE WAUKEGAN BELLEFORTE S NATIONAL K HARLEM K PROSPECT ELMORE DEMPSTER WISNER OKETO OSCEOLA DEMPSTER OLCOTT OSWEGO E MERRILL OLEANDER OZANAM OZARK ORIOLE OTTAWA 58 E ¬« N E O N P S A CUMBERLAND GRACE CAROL G DEMPSTER N A CAROL CRAIN H 14 AVERS DRAKE [£ G I A D FERRIS O CALLIE Types of Bikeways O I Dempster* KIMBALL KARLOV HAMLIN ST LOUIS ST CRAIN H C S Dempster R KEDVALE R I SCHOOL C CRAIN RAIN Y TRUMBULL FERNALD HARDING E C D E I E H RIDGEWAY KEYSTONE LAWNDALE H CAROL U NORTH MAP R ASBURY RIDGE OAK CRAWFORD WESLEY C J ASHLAND FOREST SHERMAN HINMAN M S SPRINGFIELD FLORENCE DEWEY DODGE DARROW CRAIN MONTICELLO CAPULINA CONRAD EVANSTON BROWN G GEORGIANA MCDANIEL PITNER HARTREY FOWLER CRAIN TERMINAL GOLF CLUB CENTRAL PARK GREENLEAF ST PAULS GREENLEAF GREENLEAF PARK D ¬«21 AL (see reverse for Loop inset) ROSEVIEW GREENLEAF B MAPLE O WRIGHT PRAIRIE LEE HE CEMETERY [£41 ELMWOOD MARY HILL T LEE ROBERT Protected Bike Lanes MIAMI LINCOLN LEE LEE LEE " Morton Grove* EVANSTON CEMETERY WOODS ELM CHRISTIANA CROWN PARK MAIN N Main o MAIN MAIN MAIN " Protected Bike Lanes r t MORTON WASHINGTON R h ST PAUL PCTA Purple Line MAIN LEHIGH E WASHINGTON T KEDZIE L N MADISON Sharing the Road BRUCE B to Linden -
Mcglynn Laboratories, Inc. ______
McGlynn Laboratories, Inc. __________________________________________________________________________ Seán E. McGlynn Owner 568 Beverly Ct. President Tallahassee, FL 32301 Technical Director Education Work Experience . BS Biochemistry, LSU, McGlynn Laboratories, Inc. 1977 11/1997 to Present Technical Director MA History, FSU, 1989 Background: Dr. McGlynn is a an environmental scientist with over 33 years of PhD Biology, Area III, experience addressing a wide range of environmental issues. His technical expertise is Ecology, FSU 1995 in water quality and aquatic system ecology . Dr. McGlynn began working on aquatic issues since the late 70's at the Center for Wetland Resources at Louisiana State Honors/Awards University, studying aquatic ecosystems in Hypersaline Laguna Madre, Texas and Barataria Bay in South Louisiana. Dr. McGlynn became the Research Director at Receptor Molecules, a Research and Development Laboratory developing monoclonal Ochlockonee River Soil antibodies pollutant assays 1986. Later Dr. McGlynn was the Laboratory Director at the & Water Conservation Center for Aquatic Research and Resource Management (FSU), Environmental Planning District, Supervisor, and Analysis, and Adjunct Professor at FSU where he managed ecosystem studies in District I Apalachee Bay, Amelia Estuary, Apalachicola Bay, Choctawhatchee Bay and Perdido Bay. Dr. McGlynn is currently the President of McGlynn Laboratories Inc (a nationally accredited environmental laboratory), founded in 1997, that has offices in Tallahassee, Florida Lake FL, and Baton Rouge, LA. We apply scientific methods to ecosystem studies, Management Society, particularly lake and coastal zone management. We also design and manage Board of Directors environmental restoration projects. In Louisiana we coordinate coastal zone management between Louisiana DEQ and the Army Corps of Engineers. McGlynn Laboratories, Inc. -
State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION In re: ORANGE CREEK BASIN OGC Case No. 08-0731 MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN. _____________________________________/ FINAL ORDER ESTABLISHING THE ORANGE CREEK BASIN MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN Pursuant to Section 403.067(7), Florida Statutes, this Final Order adopts the attached Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP) for the Class III surface waters within the Orange Creek Basin. The adopted BMAP, including the background and detailed management actions, is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 1. The Orange Creek BMAP was developed as part of the Department’s Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program, as authorized under the Florida Watershed Restoration Act (Chapter 403.067, Florida Statutes). All surface waters (including wetlands) in the Orange Creek Basin are designated as Class III waters in accordance with Rule 62- 302, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). Class III waters must have suitable water quality for recreational use and for the propagation and maintenance of a healthy, well- balanced population of fish and wildlife. The Orange Creek Basin is located predominately within Alachua County. The basin also includes the northern e portion of Marion County that drains to Orange Lake. The basin includes the following water bodies: • Orange Lake, Cross Creek, Lochloosa Lake, Newnans Lake, Lake Wauberg, Hatchet Creek, and Little Hatchet Creek; • Alachua Sink, which is located within the boundaries of the Paynes Prairie Preserve State Park; and ; • Gainesville urban creeks, Sweetwater Branch, Tumblin Creek, and Hogtown Creek. The waters listed above were verified as impaired pursuant to the methodology set forth in Rule 62-303, F.A.C. -
All Small-Sized Cwss That Have Certified Completion of Their RRA (Pdf)
Community water systems serving a population of 3,001 to 49,999 that certified completion of a risk and resilience assessment as required by Section 2013 of America's Water Infrastructure Act, as of July 30, 2021. PWSID Community Water System Town/City State ZIP Code 1 001570671 PACE WATER SYSTEM, INC. PACE FL 32571-0750 2 010106001 MPTN Water Treatment Department Mashantucket CT 06338 3 010109005 Mohegan Tribal Utility Authority Uncasville CT 06382 4 020000005 ST. REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE Akwesasne NY 13655 5 043740039 CHEROKEE WATER SYSTEM CHEROKEE NC 28719 6 055293201 MT. PLEASANT Mount Pleasant MI 48858 7 055293603 East Bay Water Works Peshawbestown MI 49682 8 055293611 HANNAHVILLE COMMUNITY WILSON MI 49896-9728 9 055293702 LITTLE RIVER TRIBAL WATER SYSTEM Manistee MI 49660 10 055294502 Prairie Island Indian Community Welch MN 55089 11 055294503 Lower Sioux Indian Community Morton MN 56270 12 055294506 South Water Treatment Plant Prior Lake MN 55372 13 055295003 SOUTH-CENTRAL WATER SYSTEM Bowler WI 54416 14 055295310 Giiwedin Hayward WI 54843 15 055295401 Lac du Flambeau Lac du Flambeau WI 54538 16 055295508 KESHENA KESHENA WI 54135 17 055295703 ONEIDA #1 OR SITE #1 ONEIDA WI 54155 18 061020808 POTTAWATOMIE CO. RWD #3 (DALE PLANT) Shawnee OK 74804 19 061620001 Reservation Water System Eagle Pass TX 78852 20 062004336 Chicksaw Winstar Water System Ada OK 74821 21 063501100 POJOAQUE SOUTH Santa Fe NM 87506 22 063501109 Isleta Eastside Isleta NM 87022 23 063501124 Pueblo of Zuni - Zuni Utility Department Zuni NM 87327 24 063503109 Isleta Shea Whiff Isleta NM 87022 25 063503111 LAGUNA VALLEY LAGUNA, NM 87026 NM 87007 26 063506008 Mescalero Apache Inn of the Mountain Gods Public Water System Mescalero NM 88340 27 070000003 SAC & FOX (MESKWAKI) IN IOWA TAMA IA 52339 28 083090091 TOWN OF BROWNING BROWNING MT 59417 29 083890023 Turtle Mountain Public Utilities Commission Belcourt ND 58316 30 083890025 Spirit Lake Water Management RWS St.