DOCSLIB.ORG

Workshop on Counter Terrorism in Collaboration with CEELI Institute/ FJC for High Court Justices 27 – 29, October, 2017 Serial Table of Content Page No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Workshop on Counter Terrorism in Collaboration with CEELI Institute/ FJC for High Court Justices 27 – 29, October, 2017 Serial Table of Content Page No Workshop on Counter Terrorism in Collaboration with CEELI Institute/ FJC for High Court Justices 27 – 29, October, 2017 Serial Table of Content Page No. No. Articles 1. Lawrence D. Rosenberg, Mark R. Lentz, Katherine Stern, Anthony Vitarelli Jones Day, The War on Terror in United States Courts: A Summary of Selected Key Cases, ABA Section of Litigation 2012 Section Annual Conference April 18-20, 2012: National Security Law and Policy Forum 2. Shylashri Shankar, Judicial Restraint In An Era of Terrorism: Prevention of Terrorism Cases and Minorities in India, http://docs.manupatra.in/newsline/articles/Upload/3649DBF5-BD2B-4DA1-8D75- 4AC4DE698402.pdf 3. Hindustan Times, Defending the doomed: Lawyers who stand up for terror accused, Maoists. http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/defending-the-doomed-lawyers-who-stand- up-for-terror-accused-maoists/story-3roGxXmlQeBIlwfOVVmuFO.htm 4. Jacqueline S. Hodgson and Victor Tadros, The Impossibility Of Defining Terrorism, 16 New Crim. L. Rev. 494, 526 (2013) 5. John D. Shipman, Taking Terrorism to Court: A Legal Examination of the New Front in the War on Terrorism, 86 N.C. L. Rev. 526, 571 (2008) 6. Stephen Reinhardtt, The Judicial Role in National Security, http://www.bu.edu/law/journals-archive/bulr/volume86n5/documents/ reinhardtv.2.pdf 7. Sharib Ali, Politics of Terror: The Mecca Masjid Blast Case, EPW Economic & Political Weekly, Vol xlviII no 34 (2013) 8. In Fight against Terrorism, Security Council Adopts Resolution 2322 (2016), Aiming to Strengthen International Judicial Cooperation https://www.un.org/press/en/2016/sc12620.doc.htm 9. Sudha Setty, Comparative Perspectives on Specialized Trials For Terrorism, Marine Law Review Vol. 63:1, (2010) 10. Andrew C. Mccarthy, Terrorism On Trial: The Trials of Al Qaeda, CASE W. RES. J. INT'L L., Vol. 36:513 (2004) 11. Wm. Robert Johnston, Terrorist attacks and related incidents in the United States, http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/terrorism/wrjp255a.html 12. UN: Cooperation Among Judges Vital to Counter-Terrorism Efforts, Human Rights Protection http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=53417#.WewcfmiCyUk 13. Fact Sheet: Prosecuting and Detaining Terror Suspects in the U.S. Criminal Justice System, Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/fact-sheet-prosecuting-and-detaining-terror- suspects-us-criminal-justice-system 14. Derigan Silver, Media Censorship And Access To Terrorism Trials: A Social Architecture Analysis, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy [Vol. 25], (2011) 15. Witness Protection: Legislative And Judicial Trends, http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/8788/13/13_chapter%204.pdf 16. Germain Difo, Ordinary Measures, Extraordinary Results: An Assessment of foiled Plots since 9/11, Report by American Security Project (2010) 17. List of Judicial Trials in Terrorism cases up till 2008, (Excerpt), Anti-Terror Law In India, A Study of Statutes and Judgments, 2001 – 2014 18. Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 3981 to be answered on the 18th February, 2014: ‘Terrorist Organizations’ (Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs), Annexures I and II 19. On Cases of Police Encounter Deaths: Relevant cases and Guidelines by NHRC International Conventions/ Memorandums 1. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents 1973 2. International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings, 1997 3. International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, 1999 4. Convention on Offences and Certain Other Acts Committed on Board Aircraft, 1969 5. Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft, 1973 6. Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation, 1975 7. International Convention Against Taking of Hostages, 1983 8. International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism, 2005 9. Criminal Justice Sector/Rule of Law Working Group The Rabat Memorandum on Good Practices for Effective Counterterrorism Practice in the Criminal Justice Sector, GCTF, (Provided by CEELI Institute) 10. The Hague Memorandum on Good Practices for the Judiciary in Adjudicating Terrorism Offenses, GCTF, (Provided by CEELI Institute) Indian Laws on Counter Terrorism 1. The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 2. The Arms Act, 1959 3. The Explosive Substances Act, 1908 4. The National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 Suggested Reading Law Commission Report (2006): 198th Report on Witness Identity Protection and Witness Protection Full Report at: http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/rep198.pdf Indian Scenario Judicial Role in the Fight Against Terror (CD attached containing a soft copy of following cases) Summary of Cases 1. Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat, (2014)7SCC716 2. Devender Pal Singh Bhullar vs. State of N.C.T. of Delhi, (2013) 6 SCC 195 3. Aamir Abbas Dev vs. State through NIA, 2014 (1) JCC 319 4. Ateef Nasir Mulla vs. State of Maharashtra, (2005) 7 SCC 29 (Mulund Blast case) 5. Kamarudheen vs. SHO Muvattupuzha Police Station, 2011 (1) KLJ 385 6. Kartar Singh vs. State of Punjab, (1994) 3 SCC 569 7. Maulavi Hussein Haji Abraham Umarji vs. State of Gujarat and Anr., (2004)6SCC 672 8. Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab @ Abu Mujahid vs. State of Maharashtra, (2012)9SCC1 9. Mohd. Pervez Abdul Kayuum Shaikh and Ors vs. State of Gujarat, 2011 SCC OnLine Guj 4708 10. Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs. State of Maharashtra through CBI, Bombay AND State of Maharashtra through CBI vs. Yakub Abdul Razak Memon and Ors., (2013)13SCC1 11. National Investigation Agency, NIA, Hyderabad vs. Devendra Gupta and Another, 2013(1)ALD(Cri)907 12. National Investigation Agency vs. Redaul Hussain Khan, 2010(3)GLT302 13. Pragyasingh Chandrapalsingh Thakur vs. State of Maharashtra, 2014 (1) Bom CR (Cri) 135 14. Shatrughan Chauhan and Anr. vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors., MANU/SC/0043/2014 15. State (N.C.T. of Delhi vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru, (2005)11SCC600 16. State of Andhra Pradesh through I.G. National Investigation Agency vs. Md. Hussain @ Saleem And, Sadhwi Pragya Singh Thakur vs. National Investigation Agency, (2014)1SCC 258 17. State of Maharashtra vs. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari and Ors., AIR2013SC1441 18. The State of Maharashtra vs. Sayeed Mohd. Hanif Abdul Rahim, Ashrat @ Arshad Shafiq Ahmed Ansari and Fehmida w/o Sayyed Mohd. Hanif, MANU/MH/0142/2012 18. Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh and Anr. vs. State of Gujarat and Ors., (2004)4SCC158 20. Zahira Habibullah Sheikh and Anr. vs. State of Gujarat and Ors., (2006)3SCC 374 21. National Human Rights Commission vs. State of Gujarat and Ors. (2009)6SCC342 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mandate and Organisational Structure of the Ministry of Home Affairs
    MANDATE AND ORGANISATIONAL CHAPTER STRUCTURE OF THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS I 1.1 The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has Fighters’ pension, Human rights, Prison multifarious responsibilities, important among them Reforms, Police Reforms, etc. ; being internal security, management of para-military forces, border management, Centre-State relations, Department of Home, dealing with the administration of Union territories, disaster notification of assumption of office by the management, etc. Though in terms of Entries 1 and President and Vice-President, notification of 2 of List II – ‘State List’ – in the Seventh Schedule to appointment/resignation of the Prime Minister, the Constitution of India, ‘public order’ and ‘police’ Ministers, Governors, nomination to Rajya are the responsibilities of States, Article 355 of the Sabha/Lok Sabha, Census of population, Constitution enjoins the Union to protect every State registration of births and deaths, etc.; against external aggression and internal disturbance and to ensure that the government of every State is Department of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Affairs, dealing with the constitutional Constitution. In pursuance of these obligations, the provisions in respect of the State of Jammu Ministry of Home Affairs extends manpower and and Kashmir and all other matters relating to financial support, guidance and expertise to the State the State, excluding those with which the Governments for maintenance of security, peace and Ministry of External Affairs
    [Show full text]
  • Samjhauta Express Case Verdict
    Samjhauta Express Case Verdict Jess metaphrase northerly if multilineal Nels nid-nod or beaches. Jesse remains furcate after Rodd aggregate tactfully or gasiform.cavorts any altimetry. Flourishing Thorny bespangled no purfles spiral unaccompanied after Binky forays heavily, quite Zakir was devoid of the resultant fire could not allow your home in samjhauta express is required and all been tortured to appear in pakistani law Afghan national and planing to purchase property in Bahria town Islamabad. The investigators had therefore to move carefully and look at unimpeachable evidence to come to any conclusion about the actual perpetrators. The station consists of one platform. The NIA in its charge sheet had named eight persons as accused. Must I use the services of a USA visa center? Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website. Our pen analogy can be extended to renting property. Crime log Between India And Pakistan Safety Comparison. What happens after I have applied? Two unexploded suitcase bombs were also found in other compartments of the train. PR ordeal in busy places, so pick and choose your battles wisely. New India, however, abounds in mysteries. File photo of Swami Aseemanand. The Indian government and media initially began pointing the finger at Pakistan for the terror attacks. In its charge sheet, the NIA named, Naba Kumar Sarkar also known as Swami Aseemanand, Sunil Joshi, Lokesh Sharma, Sandeep Dange, Ramchandra Kalasangra, Rajinder Chaudhary and Kamal Chauhan as accused. What are the processing times and prices? However, the judge added, the call details of any mobile phone or any other evidence related to the ownership of any mobile phone by the suspects were not brought on record.
    [Show full text]
  • In Central Chronicle on Nov. 25, 2010
    Edit Bhopal, Thursday, November 25, 2010 6 A Swami with Terror Agenda n 19 November 2010, the agencies and some of them Swami Asimanand is a native which recently filed a Founder : Late Shri Ramgopal Maheshwari CBI arrested “Swami were falsely implicated. In of Hooghly district of West chargesheet in the Ajmer Dar- During interrogation, as OAsimanand”, believed to Ajmer blast, about a dozen Bengal, who, joined the gah blast case, Swami Aseem- per the CBI, Swami’s be the mastermind of the Muslims Imams, Maulanas, Ramkrishna Mission in anand was the man behind a Ajmer Dargah and Mecca and Madrasa teachers were 1990s, but soon disillusioned wave of attacks on Muslims’ EDITORIAL name cropped up along Masjid, Hyderabad blasts – detained and tortured by the with Left government, places of worship allegedly with the other accused, both occurred on 11 October Rajasthan Anti-Terrorist migrated to the tribal area of carried out by extremist and 18 May 2007 respectively. Squad (ATS). Dangs in Gujarat. In Dangs, Hindu outfits. Sandeep Darge, Ram In Mecca Masjid blast, 16 per- Swami Asimanand’s name Swami established Shabarid- Not only Swami funded Chadra Kalsangra alias sons were killed and 100 first came up during the ham Ashram in 2001 and these terror attacks, but had Nitish retains Bihar rein injured, while at Malegaon blast probe when started his missionary work also been instrumental in he coalition of by 33. The prospectus Ramjee, both Ajmer Dargah the Maharashtra ATS recov- focused on converting tribals bringing together a motley Janta Dal (U) and of the party are fur- residents of three people were ered his driver, Sunil from Christianity to Hin- group of extremists Devendra Bhartiya Janata ther invigorated.
    [Show full text]
  • Revamping the National Security Laws of India: Need of the Hour”
    FINAL REPORT OF MINOR RESEARCH PROJECT “REVAMPING THE NATIONAL SECURITY LAWS OF INDIA: NEED OF THE HOUR” Principal Investigator Mr. Aman Rameshwar Mishra Assistant Professor BVDU, New Law College, Pune SUBMITTED TO UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION WESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE, GANESHKHIND, PUNE-411007 August, 2017 ACKNOWLEGEMENT “REVAMPING THE NATIONAL SECURITY LAWS OF INDIA: NEED OF THE HOUR” is a non-doctrinal project, conducted to find out the actual implementation of the laws made for the national security. This Minor research project undertaken was indeed a difficult task but it was an endeavour to find out different dimensions in which the national security laws are implemented by the executive branch of the government. At such a juncture, it was necessary to rethink on this much litigated right. Our interest in this area has promoted us to undertake this venture. We are thankful to UGC for giving us this opportunity. We are also thankful Prof. Dr. Mukund Sarda, Dean and Principal for giving his valuable advices and guiding us. Our heartfelt gratitude to Dr. Ujwala Bendale for giving more insight about the subject. We are also thankful to Dr. Jyoti Dharm, Archana Ubhe & Vaibhav Bhagat for assisting us by formatting and typing the work. We are grateful to the faculty of New Law College, Pune for their support and the library staff for cooperating to fulfil this endeavour. We are indebted to our families respectively for their support throughout the completion of this project. Prof. Aman R. Mishra Principle Investigator i CONTENTS Sr No. PARTICULARS Page No. 1. CHAPTER- I 1 -24 INTRODUCTION 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Kumarappa-Reckless Award Ora on Prof
    Kumarappa-Reckless Award Oraon delivered at 40th All India Conference of Indian Society of Criminology on 19th January, 2018 at Gujarat Naonal Law University Gandhinagar on Decoding Conversaons and Restang Criminology in India IETY OF OC CR S IM N O IA N D O N L I O E G H Y T By Prof.(Dr.) G.S. Bajpai Professor of Criminology & Criminal Jusce Chairperson, Centre for Criminology & Vicmology & Registrar, Naonal Law University Delhi Kumarappa-Reckless Award Oraon delivered during the 40th All India Conference of the Indian Society of Criminology on January 19, 2018 at the Gujarat Naonal Law University, Gandhinagar Decoding Conversaons and Restang Criminology in India By G.S. Bajpai1 It's indeed a special moment for me!! With all humility and a great sense of achievement, I thank all those instrumental in having me here to receive the highest honor in the field of criminology in India. I also take this opportunity to express my gratude to the fraternity in the Indian Society of Criminology, my teachers, and colleagues and well-wishers who at different stages of career supported me to the extent that I am here today before you for delivering this presgious oraon. The Present Paper Nothing happens on the earth that does not challenge criminological imaginaon. Criminology is a mysterious discipline. Other than in the formal world, it exists more and more in popular conversaons of the laymen when they try to understand crime and criminals in their own extraordinary ways. The people in general have an amazing sense in India to explain criminality around them.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative The Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) is an independent, non-profit, non-partisan, international non-governmental organisation working in the area of human rights. In 1987, several Commonwealth professional associations founded CHRI, since there was little focus on human rights within the association of 53 nations although the Commonwealth provided member countries the basis of shared common laws. Through its reports and periodic investigations, CHRI continually draws attention to the progress and setbacks to human rights in Commonwealth countries. In advocating for approaches and measures to prevent human rights abuses, CHRI addresses the Commonwealth Secretariat, the United Nations Human Rights Council members, the media and civil society. It works on and collaborates around public education programmes, policy dialogues, comparative research, advocacy and networking on the issues of Access to Information and Access to Justice. CHRI’s seeks to promote adherence to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Commonwealth Harare Principles and other internationally recognised human rights instruments, as well as domestic instruments supporting human rights in the Commonwealth. CHRI is headquartered in New Delhi, India, with offices in London, UK and Accra, Ghana. International Advisory Commission: Yashpal Ghai, Chairperson. Members: Alison Duxbury, Wajahat Habibullah, Vivek Maru, Edward Mortimer, Sam Okudzeto and Sanjoy Hazarika. Executive Committee (India): Wajahat Habibullah, Chairperson. Members: B. K. Chandrashekar, Jayanto Choudhury, Maja Daruwala, Nitin Desai, Kamal Kumar, Poonam Muttreja, Jacob Punnoose, Vineeta Rai, Nidhi Razdan, A P Shah, and Sanjoy Hazarika. Executive Committee (Ghana): Sam Okudzeto, Chairperson. Members: Akoto Ampaw, Yashpal Ghai, Wajahat Habibullah, Kofi Quashigah, Juliette Tuakli and Sanjoy Hazarika.
    [Show full text]
  • Nderstanding the Religious Nature of Terrorism in India: Four Case Studies with an Analysis for Proposals and Resolution
    UNDERSTANDING THE RELIGIOUS NATURE OF TERRORISM IN INDIA: FOUR CASE STUDIES WITH AN ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSALS AND RESOLUTION BY KAILASH KUMAR CHATRY A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion School of Historical Studies College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham 17 October 2012. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT India has faced the challenge of religious terrorism for almost three decades. This phenomenon – in-spite of the Indian government’s comprehensive effort to contain it – has been spreading its vicious influence and expanding its support base among the conflicting religious communities in many parts of the country. The existing views, in regard to the rise of religious terrorism, suggest that economic, socio-political or geo-political issues (that cropped up during the post-partition period) are responsible for the birth of the problem. However, so far no study is done collectively on the four (Sikh, Kashmiri Muslim, Hindu and Naga Christian) religious communities to explain the cause of the problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Terror Law in India
    f ANTI-TERROR LAW IN INDIA A STUDY OF STATUTES AND JUDGMENTS , 2001 – 2014 Srijoni Sen Rukmini Das Raadhika Gupta Vrinda Bhandari June 2015 www.vidhilegalpolicy.in Authors Acknowledgments Srijoni Sen is a Senior Resident Fellow at the We would like to thank Sakshi Aravind, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy Abhinav Sekhri, Arshu John and Shreya Prakash whose valuable assistance was Rukmini Das is a PhD candidate and research instrumental in the writing of this report. assistant at the Faculty of Law, University of Geneva. She is a Non-Resident Expert at Vidhi Raadhika Gupta is a Consultant at the National Skill Development Agency, New Delhi, and a Non-Resident Expert at Vidhi Vrinda Bhandari is an Advocate at the High Court of Delhi, and a Non-Resident Expert at Vidhi © Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, 2015 Cover image by Dcastor is licensed under CC3.0. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER I: OVERVIEW OF LAWS ........................................................................ 6 A. Laws Governing Substantive Offences ............................................................. 6 B. Laws Governing Investigation and Trial ......................................................... 11 1. Investigation ........................................................................................ 11 2. Courts ................................................................................................ 13 3. Criminal Procedure ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Terrorism (Riots)
    0 ALL TERRORISTS ARE MUSLIM Someone said, “ALL TERRORISTS ARE MUSLIM. SO WE HATE ALL MUSLIMS, WHETHER HE IS BEARDED OR CLEAN SHAVED WHETHER SHE IS IN HIJAB OR WITHOUT HIJAB.” Of course its quiet easy to say that “All terrorist are Muslim’’. But whenever it comes into the terms of facts and figure then I think it will be much more easy to say that “ARE ALL TERRORISTS MUSLIM’’? Let’s analyze then: WHAT IS TERRORISM The root of the word terrorism is taken from a Latin term that means “to frighten”. It became part of the phrase terror cimbricus, which was used by ancient Romans in 105BC to describe the panic that ensued as they prepared for an attack by a fierce warrior tribe. Many years later that fact was taken into account during the bloody reign of Maximilien Robespierre during the French Revolution. Terror is a feeling of intense and overwhelming fear, and that is exactly what Robespierre brought to the people of France. Following the execution of Louis XVI, Robespierre was made the de facto leader of the French government. He was a member of the Jacobins political party, and used his new found power to attack his political enemies, the Girondins. Thousands of people were executed at Robespierre’s request, and it became one of the bloodiest times in French history. Most of the victims were beheaded using the guillotine (BEHEADING), which was often referred to by the title “The National Razor”. Any opposition to the power of the Jacobins was immediately squashed, and people lived in fear of retribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Scroll - Hindutva Terror Acquittals Expose Indias Deeply Compromised Criminal Justice System
    4/19/2019 Scroll - Hindutva terror acquittals expose Indias deeply compromised criminal justice system SAFFRON TERROR ‘Hindutva terror’ acquittals expose India’s deeply compromised criminal justice system One by one, persons credibly charged with Hindutva terror attacks since 2006 have been discharged by courts, always on grounds of shoddy police investigation. Mohsin Alam Bhat & Harsh Mander 3 hours ago Pragya Thakur and Assemanand. India’s criminal justice system has long been profoundly compromised by its deeply ingrained prejudice against India’s oppressed populations – Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims, women and the poor. Under the watch of successive governments, this institutional bias has corroded every arm of the justice system – the police, the prosecution and the courts. https://scroll.in/article/print/920075 1/14 4/19/2019 Scroll - Hindutva terror acquittals expose Indias deeply compromised criminal justice system In its hostility to Muslims, however, the justice system has arguably plumbed its lowest depths in the years since Narendra Modi took office as India’s prime minister in 2014. Even as a deadly scourge of cow lynching and other hate crimes peaked in this period, the police frequently would register criminal charges against the victims, protecting the attackers instead. Often cow or love jihad vigilantes and the police would be seen working closely in unison. In Uttar Pradesh and Haryana, targeted extra-judicial killings surged. What is more, in these years, those charged with communal hate crimes and fake extra-judicial killings in Gujarat in 2002 and after, including a senior minister and many men in uniform, were first released on bail soon after the government changed hands in Delhi in 2014, and then acquitted one by one.
    [Show full text]
  • Saffron Terror Cases
    ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Clean Chits, Deaths, Acquittals: The Unending 'Tricks of Fate' in Saffron Terror Cases SHARIB A ALI Sharib A Ali ([email protected]) is a human rights practitioner based in Delhi. His research focus is on terror prosecution in India. Vol. 53, Issue No. 17, 28 Apr, 2018 The author would like to thank Monica Sakhrani for her comments on the first draft of this article and for help in thinking through the subject. The article looks at the "experiment of saffron terror," its link with the ruling dispensation, and how the cases of saffron terror have unfolded since the National Democratic Alliance came to power in 2014. Looking at the character of Swami Aseemanand as a product of the contradictions of the experiment, it makes a case for the arrival of dual law in the country. From a criminal justice point of view, the Mecca Masjid blast case against the Abhinav Bharat members was a strong one. A confession under Section 164 in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with all its checks and balances, corroborating evidence, witnesses and a series of documents, files, and minutes of meetings, put together strong documentary evidence of a larger conspiracy. However, on 16 April 2018, the special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court acquitted all the five accused in the Mecca Masjid blast case (Indian Express 2018). As the judgement remains unavailable, it is difficult to ascertain the judicial reasoning that went into the acquittals. As many as 66 witnesses (of the 226 deposed) turned hostile in the case (Ahuja 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Terror Free India.P65
    TERROR FREE INDIA Insight & Road Ahead sio MEDIA WATCH Students Islamic Organisation of India (SIO) Karnataka Zone No. 7, SRK Garden, Jayanagar East, Bangalore – 560041 Ph: 080-26646861, Email: [email protected] Copyright © Students Islamic Organisation of India (SIO) 2015 All rights reserved. CONTRIBUTORS : Suhail KK Ram Punyani Ajit Sahi A.K Kukkila Syed Tanveer Ahmed Nihal Kidiyoor EDITORS : Azharuddin Pilakodan Labeed Shafi First Edition: Sept 2015 An Initiative of sio MEDIA WATCH Students Islamic Organisation of India (SIO) Karnataka Zone No. 7, SRK Garden, Jayanagar East, Bangalore – 560041 Ph: 080-26646861, Email: [email protected] 2 TERROR FREE INDIA INSIGHT & ROAD AHEAD "Help your brother, whether he is an oppressor or he is an oppressed one. People asked, “it is all right to help him if he is oppressed, but how should we help him if he is an oppressor?" The Prophet said, "By preventing him from oppressing others." - Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” - Martin Luther King TERROR FREE INDIA INSIGHT & ROAD AHEAD 3 4 TERROR FREE INDIA INSIGHT & ROAD AHEAD CONTENTS: 1. FOREWORD 7 Labeed Shafi 2. WAR ON TERROR - A GLOBAL DESIGN FOR ABSOLUTE CONTROL 11 Suhail K.K 3. TERRORISM: SYMPTOM OF DISEASE 21 Dr. Ram Punyani 4. UNDERSTANDING TERRORISM 24 Syed Tanveer Ahmed. 5. TERRORISM & INVESTIGATIVE AGENCIES 26 Ajit Sahi 6. INTERVIEW WITH SYED AQLAQ AHMED 33 Nihal Kidiyoor. 7. TERRORISM - A GLOBAL THREAT 38 Azharuddin Pilakodan 8. ªÉÆzÀ® ªÀiÁvÀÄ 40 Labeed Shafi 9. ¨sÀAiÉÆÃvÁàzÀ£É ªÀÄÄPÀÛ ¨sÁgÀvÀzÀ ¸ÁzsÁå¸ÁzsÀåvÉ... 43 A.K. Kukkila TERROR FREE INDIA INSIGHT & ROAD AHEAD 5 6 TERROR FREE INDIA INSIGHT & ROAD AHEAD FOREWORD Pluralism is an intrinsic characteristic of our nation.
    [Show full text]