ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Clean Chits, Deaths, Acquittals: The Unending 'Tricks of Fate' in Saffron Terror Cases SHARIB A ALI Sharib A Ali (
[email protected]) is a human rights practitioner based in Delhi. His research focus is on terror prosecution in India. Vol. 53, Issue No. 17, 28 Apr, 2018 The author would like to thank Monica Sakhrani for her comments on the first draft of this article and for help in thinking through the subject. The article looks at the "experiment of saffron terror," its link with the ruling dispensation, and how the cases of saffron terror have unfolded since the National Democratic Alliance came to power in 2014. Looking at the character of Swami Aseemanand as a product of the contradictions of the experiment, it makes a case for the arrival of dual law in the country. From a criminal justice point of view, the Mecca Masjid blast case against the Abhinav Bharat members was a strong one. A confession under Section 164 in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with all its checks and balances, corroborating evidence, witnesses and a series of documents, files, and minutes of meetings, put together strong documentary evidence of a larger conspiracy. However, on 16 April 2018, the special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court acquitted all the five accused in the Mecca Masjid blast case (Indian Express 2018). As the judgement remains unavailable, it is difficult to ascertain the judicial reasoning that went into the acquittals. As many as 66 witnesses (of the 226 deposed) turned hostile in the case (Ahuja 2018).