Download File

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download File Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative The Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) is an independent, non-profit, non-partisan, international non-governmental organisation working in the area of human rights. In 1987, several Commonwealth professional associations founded CHRI, since there was little focus on human rights within the association of 53 nations although the Commonwealth provided member countries the basis of shared common laws. Through its reports and periodic investigations, CHRI continually draws attention to the progress and setbacks to human rights in Commonwealth countries. In advocating for approaches and measures to prevent human rights abuses, CHRI addresses the Commonwealth Secretariat, the United Nations Human Rights Council members, the media and civil society. It works on and collaborates around public education programmes, policy dialogues, comparative research, advocacy and networking on the issues of Access to Information and Access to Justice. CHRI’s seeks to promote adherence to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Commonwealth Harare Principles and other internationally recognised human rights instruments, as well as domestic instruments supporting human rights in the Commonwealth. CHRI is headquartered in New Delhi, India, with offices in London, UK and Accra, Ghana. International Advisory Commission: Yashpal Ghai, Chairperson. Members: Alison Duxbury, Wajahat Habibullah, Vivek Maru, Edward Mortimer, Sam Okudzeto and Sanjoy Hazarika. Executive Committee (India): Wajahat Habibullah, Chairperson. Members: B. K. Chandrashekar, Jayanto Choudhury, Maja Daruwala, Nitin Desai, Kamal Kumar, Poonam Muttreja, Jacob Punnoose, Vineeta Rai, Nidhi Razdan, A P Shah, and Sanjoy Hazarika. Executive Committee (Ghana): Sam Okudzeto, Chairperson. Members: Akoto Ampaw, Yashpal Ghai, Wajahat Habibullah, Kofi Quashigah, Juliette Tuakli and Sanjoy Hazarika. Executive Committee (UK): Joanna Ewart-James, Chairperson. Members: Richard Bourne, Pralab Barua, Tony Foreman, Neville Linton, Suzanne Lambert and Sanjoy Hazarika. Sanjoy Hazarika, International Director ISBN: 978-93-81241-52-3 ©Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, 2018. Material from this report may be used, duly acknowledging the source. CHRI Headquarters, New Delhi CHRI London CHRI Africa, Accra 55A, Third Floor Room No. 219 House No.9, Samora Machel Street Siddharth Chambers School of Advanced Study Asylum Down, Opposite Beverly Kalu Sarai, New Delhi 110 017 South Block, Senate House Hills Hotel Near Trust Towers, India Malet Street, London WC1E Accra, Ghana Tel: +91 11 4318 0200 7HU, United Kingdom Tel/Fax: +233 302 971170 Fax: +91 11 2686 4688 E-mail: Email: E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.humanrightsinitiative.org Quill Foundation Quill Foundation is an autonomous institution engaging in research and advocacy in India. Quill’s work revolves around pertinent issues of human rights, justice and equity faced by the marginalized of India, especially Muslims, Adivasis, Dalits, women, sexual minorities and differently-abled persons. The Delhi based Law and Human Rights Cell (LHRC) of Quill Foundation seeks to examine the many ways in which legal and judicial processes form the basis for everyday injustices, and reflect how the interface between law and the social world, perceives citizens differently in terms of access to rights and justice, especially in the cases of counter-terrorism prosecution, extrajudicial killings, torture, policing, and the de-legitimization of citizenship in India. LHRC undertakes sustained documentation, intervention and advocacy from a human rights approach and engages with rights institution in India and abroad: especially the United Nations and the national human rights institutions. With a firm belief in a just and egalitarian world, Quill Foundation’s intervention is oriented towards change both, on the ground as well as at the level of policy. Quill Foundation Team: Suhail KK, Director, Sharib A. Ali, Programs Director, Law and Human Rights Cell, Vipul Kumar, Project Coordinator (Citizens Against Hate), Fawaz Shaheen, Project Coordinator (Hate crimes & Policing), Baljeet Kaur, Project Coordinator (Counter-terrorism & Human Rights), Faraz Akhtar, Research Officer, Prachi Lohia, Advocacy Officer, Adv Mangla Verma, Legal Consultant. © Copyright 2018 Quill Foundation. Material from this report may be used, duly acknowledging the source. For more information on Quill Foundation, visit: www.quillfoundation.com Quill Foundation, New Delhi F-13, 3rd Floor, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014 www.humanrightsinitiative.org Muslim Voices: Perceptions of Policing in India Research and Writing Team Devika Prasad, Aditi Datta, Ankur Otto and Fawaz Shaheen Edited by Sanjoy Hazarika, Devika Prasad and Sharib Ali This report has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The European Union is made up of 28 Member States who have decided to gradually link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, during a period of enlargement of 50 years, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. Table of Contents Acknowledgements viii Executive Summary ix Introduction 1 Community Perceptions of Policing 10 Muslim Police Officers: Perceptions, Experiences and Challenges 25 Conclusion and Recommendations 37 Annexure 1: Questions for Retired Muslim Police Officers 43 Annexure 2 : Exoneree Testimonies 46 Acknowledgements This study and report come out of a joint effort of the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative and Quill Foundation. We sincerely thank all the colleagues, friends, civil society partners, and retired police officers who supported the research, and helped to put us in touch with Muslim community organisations and retired police across states. We gratefully acknowledge the presence and contribution of every individual participant in the focus group discussions, who participated so openly and meaningfully. In the same way, we express our sincere thanks to all the retired Muslim police officers and members of civil society organisations whom we met and interviewed separately. These are the bedrock on which this report was made possible. Several civil society organisations extended the invaluable help of facilitating FGDs for us. We express special thanks to the Association for Protection of Civil Rights, Solidarity Youth Movement, Association for Advocacy and Legal Initiatives, Alternative Law Forurm, Movement for Justice, Vimochana, Indian Muslims for Secular Democracy and Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan. In Guwahati, we are grateful to Studio Nilima for providing their premises for the group discussions. CHRI expresses gratitude to Faisal Khan of Khudai Khidmitgar who organized meetings and discussions in the initial phase of the research enabling us to get our first understanding of ground realities, and to Tahmina Laskar who led the study’s direction in the first phase. This research and study could be done through the generous support of the European Union. viii MUSLIM VOICES: PERCEPTIONS OF POLICING IN INDIA Executive Summary This report documents the perceptions and experiences of policing in India of Muslim citizens. It is a result of a study conducted by the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative and Quill Foundation. The study, spread across eight cities and several geographies1, focuses on issues related to everyday policing- access, engagement, and discrimination - as perceived by common Muslim citizens, along with a special focus on the experience of Muslim police officers themselves. Muslim community perceptions of policing The findings of the study present a picture of policing of Muslims characterized by discrimination, various degrees of harassment, as well as coercive containments of Muslim neighborhoods and activities. One set of the study’s respondents - 197 Muslim citizens - convey a pervasive sense of actively practiced discrimination, victimization, and coercive targeting by the police based on their distinct identity as Muslims. They feel they are, both individually and in groups, under constant suspicion of supporting ‘anti-national’ activities, surveilled and subject to higher levels of intrusive policing; and that the police makes deliberate efforts to limit and prevent community mobilization. The key findings are: • Police target and victimize Muslims based on their identity, revealing a distinct bias The respondents unanimously expressed that the police targets and victimizes Muslims, resulting in ‘kafkaesque’ feelings within the Muslim community- cycles of fear, intimidation, and the constant threat of being detained, abused, and possibly incarcerated. • Muslim women feel a double burden amplifying a multi-layered bias Across states, Muslim women expressed the difficulty of bearing the ‘double burden’ of being a Muslim and a woman. Women distinctly felt their identity as Muslims was a primary reason for both police indifference and bias towards them. They unanimously said that police attitude and behavior is sharply prejudiced when women access the police wearing Muslim identity markers like burqa/hijab. • Display of Hindu religious practices and symbols in police stations are perceived with apprehension and discomfort, and elicit exclusion The respondents unanimously
Recommended publications
  • 440 Responding to Danger to Indian Democracy
    Vol. XXXIX, No. 1 ISSN-0970-8693 JANUARY 2019 Rs. 20 Presidential address for the National Council Meeting on 24-25th November 2018 at GPF, Delhi: Presidential address for NC Meeting at Responding to Danger to Indian Democracy GPF, Delhi: Responding to Danger to Ravi Kiran Jain* Indian Democracy - Ravi Kiran Jain (1) This meeting of the National Council is being held in extremely a grim situation. This situation is an inevitable result of Modi's election campaign and then his rule after coming into power in 2014. The 2014 elections were GS Report for NC Meeting for the year based on emotive communal divide which had literally dumped the basic 2016-18 (3); Bihar PUCL Report presented issues into the dustbin of electoral politics and Modi's communal divide plank became a determinant of success of his election. The new political scenario in NC Meeting (6); Delhi PUCL Report (8); has certainly brought the atmosphere of communal hatred and grave fear in PUCL TN & Puducherry Report of Activities the society as a result of which the fundamental questions like elimination of done during 2017-2018 (9); PUCL poverty, the distribution of national wealth, the assurance of social justice in Karnataka Report presented in NC Meeting civil society of our time are being brushed aside under the carpet. (11); Understanding PUCL - Prabhakar Recent years have witnessed systematic attacks on human right defenders Sinha (12); PUCL Punjab Reoprt (14); and fearless journalists, writers and rationalists. 2019 polls are going to be Editor's Note: The Hashimpura Massacres between democracy and authoritarian rule.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interview with Teesta Setalvad
    Jindal Global Law Review https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-020-00116-3 ARTICLE Proto‑fascism and State impunity in Majoritarian India: An Interview with Teesta Setalvad Oishik Sircar1 © O.P. Jindal Global University (JGU) 2020 Abstract This interview with Teesta Setalvad was conducted in the wake of the February 2020 anti-Muslim violence in North East Delhi. Drawing on her vast experience as a human rights activist, journalist, and peace educator, Setalvad’s responses map the continuum — across years, anti-minority pogroms and ruling parties with divergent ideologies — of the cultures of hate, and the practices of state repression and impu- nity in a proto-fascist India. Setalvad ofers an interrogation of the ideology of the Hindu right, delves into the historical trajectories of the rise of the Rashtriya Sway- amsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). She also charts the repeating patterns of police and media complicity in fomenting anti-minority hate and critically analyses the contradictory role of the criminal law and the Constitu- tion of India in both enabling and resisting communal violence. In conclusion, she ofers hopeful strategies for keeping alive the promise of secularism. Keywords State impunity · Hindutva · Gujarat 2002 · Pogrom · Genocide 1 Introduction The cover of Teesta Setalvad’s memoir — Foot Soldier of the Constitution — features a photograph of her looking directly into the eyes of the reader.1 Her face is partly lit and lightly silhouetted, her eyes simultaneously conveying an invitation and a provocation. One might use words like determination, courage and fortitude to describe the expres- sion on her face — as the blurb on the back cover of the book does.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandate and Organisational Structure of the Ministry of Home Affairs
    MANDATE AND ORGANISATIONAL CHAPTER STRUCTURE OF THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS I 1.1 The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has Fighters’ pension, Human rights, Prison multifarious responsibilities, important among them Reforms, Police Reforms, etc. ; being internal security, management of para-military forces, border management, Centre-State relations, Department of Home, dealing with the administration of Union territories, disaster notification of assumption of office by the management, etc. Though in terms of Entries 1 and President and Vice-President, notification of 2 of List II – ‘State List’ – in the Seventh Schedule to appointment/resignation of the Prime Minister, the Constitution of India, ‘public order’ and ‘police’ Ministers, Governors, nomination to Rajya are the responsibilities of States, Article 355 of the Sabha/Lok Sabha, Census of population, Constitution enjoins the Union to protect every State registration of births and deaths, etc.; against external aggression and internal disturbance and to ensure that the government of every State is Department of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Affairs, dealing with the constitutional Constitution. In pursuance of these obligations, the provisions in respect of the State of Jammu Ministry of Home Affairs extends manpower and and Kashmir and all other matters relating to financial support, guidance and expertise to the State the State, excluding those with which the Governments for maintenance of security, peace and Ministry of External Affairs
    [Show full text]
  • Samjhauta Express Case Verdict
    Samjhauta Express Case Verdict Jess metaphrase northerly if multilineal Nels nid-nod or beaches. Jesse remains furcate after Rodd aggregate tactfully or gasiform.cavorts any altimetry. Flourishing Thorny bespangled no purfles spiral unaccompanied after Binky forays heavily, quite Zakir was devoid of the resultant fire could not allow your home in samjhauta express is required and all been tortured to appear in pakistani law Afghan national and planing to purchase property in Bahria town Islamabad. The investigators had therefore to move carefully and look at unimpeachable evidence to come to any conclusion about the actual perpetrators. The station consists of one platform. The NIA in its charge sheet had named eight persons as accused. Must I use the services of a USA visa center? Time updates on stories, as they get published on our website. Our pen analogy can be extended to renting property. Crime log Between India And Pakistan Safety Comparison. What happens after I have applied? Two unexploded suitcase bombs were also found in other compartments of the train. PR ordeal in busy places, so pick and choose your battles wisely. New India, however, abounds in mysteries. File photo of Swami Aseemanand. The Indian government and media initially began pointing the finger at Pakistan for the terror attacks. In its charge sheet, the NIA named, Naba Kumar Sarkar also known as Swami Aseemanand, Sunil Joshi, Lokesh Sharma, Sandeep Dange, Ramchandra Kalasangra, Rajinder Chaudhary and Kamal Chauhan as accused. What are the processing times and prices? However, the judge added, the call details of any mobile phone or any other evidence related to the ownership of any mobile phone by the suspects were not brought on record.
    [Show full text]
  • In Central Chronicle on Nov. 25, 2010
    Edit Bhopal, Thursday, November 25, 2010 6 A Swami with Terror Agenda n 19 November 2010, the agencies and some of them Swami Asimanand is a native which recently filed a Founder : Late Shri Ramgopal Maheshwari CBI arrested “Swami were falsely implicated. In of Hooghly district of West chargesheet in the Ajmer Dar- During interrogation, as OAsimanand”, believed to Ajmer blast, about a dozen Bengal, who, joined the gah blast case, Swami Aseem- per the CBI, Swami’s be the mastermind of the Muslims Imams, Maulanas, Ramkrishna Mission in anand was the man behind a Ajmer Dargah and Mecca and Madrasa teachers were 1990s, but soon disillusioned wave of attacks on Muslims’ EDITORIAL name cropped up along Masjid, Hyderabad blasts – detained and tortured by the with Left government, places of worship allegedly with the other accused, both occurred on 11 October Rajasthan Anti-Terrorist migrated to the tribal area of carried out by extremist and 18 May 2007 respectively. Squad (ATS). Dangs in Gujarat. In Dangs, Hindu outfits. Sandeep Darge, Ram In Mecca Masjid blast, 16 per- Swami Asimanand’s name Swami established Shabarid- Not only Swami funded Chadra Kalsangra alias sons were killed and 100 first came up during the ham Ashram in 2001 and these terror attacks, but had Nitish retains Bihar rein injured, while at Malegaon blast probe when started his missionary work also been instrumental in he coalition of by 33. The prospectus Ramjee, both Ajmer Dargah the Maharashtra ATS recov- focused on converting tribals bringing together a motley Janta Dal (U) and of the party are fur- residents of three people were ered his driver, Sunil from Christianity to Hin- group of extremists Devendra Bhartiya Janata ther invigorated.
    [Show full text]
  • First Session
    Workshop and Public Meeting at St Xavier’s College Mumbai, January 2nd, 2013 Part of month long series of events: Bombay ki kahani, Mumbai ki Zabaani The magnificent hall at St Xavier’s College, with its fine wood ceiling and somber portraits of former Principals looking down from on high, hosted the conference which was well attended by a mix of ages, sexes, and communities. It was a good day to have this meeting as the Supreme Court of India had rejected Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi’s petition against the appointment of a Lok Ayukta. The St Xaviers hall had a powerful Exhibition put up by the Sabrang Team -- 30 powerful black and white photos and Text Panels spanning twenty years since 1992-1993 First Session: Teesta Setalvad, Sabrang introduced the speakers for the first panel, Harsh Mander, former IAS (Indian Administrative Service) officer who as Collector of a district in Madhya Pradesh managed to ensure that his district did not burn with ‘riots’. John Dayal: Journalist and Christian activist would speak about atrocities against Christians in Kandhamal District, Orissa. Dr Amarjitsingh Narang who has campaigned tirelessly for justice for the Sikh victims of the massacres of 1984. Teesta Setalvad criticized the print media for not covering the pogrom of 1984 thoroughly. It was left to the PUCL (People’s Union for Civil Liberties) which in its pamphlet “Who are the Guilty?” documented the names of the instigators of violence. Sikh victims have not been able to get substantive justice till today. A Bitter Legacy of Impunity – An Overview: Harsh Mander stressed on the importance of rememberance so as not to repeat past horrors.
    [Show full text]
  • Revamping the National Security Laws of India: Need of the Hour”
    FINAL REPORT OF MINOR RESEARCH PROJECT “REVAMPING THE NATIONAL SECURITY LAWS OF INDIA: NEED OF THE HOUR” Principal Investigator Mr. Aman Rameshwar Mishra Assistant Professor BVDU, New Law College, Pune SUBMITTED TO UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION WESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE, GANESHKHIND, PUNE-411007 August, 2017 ACKNOWLEGEMENT “REVAMPING THE NATIONAL SECURITY LAWS OF INDIA: NEED OF THE HOUR” is a non-doctrinal project, conducted to find out the actual implementation of the laws made for the national security. This Minor research project undertaken was indeed a difficult task but it was an endeavour to find out different dimensions in which the national security laws are implemented by the executive branch of the government. At such a juncture, it was necessary to rethink on this much litigated right. Our interest in this area has promoted us to undertake this venture. We are thankful to UGC for giving us this opportunity. We are also thankful Prof. Dr. Mukund Sarda, Dean and Principal for giving his valuable advices and guiding us. Our heartfelt gratitude to Dr. Ujwala Bendale for giving more insight about the subject. We are also thankful to Dr. Jyoti Dharm, Archana Ubhe & Vaibhav Bhagat for assisting us by formatting and typing the work. We are grateful to the faculty of New Law College, Pune for their support and the library staff for cooperating to fulfil this endeavour. We are indebted to our families respectively for their support throughout the completion of this project. Prof. Aman R. Mishra Principle Investigator i CONTENTS Sr No. PARTICULARS Page No. 1. CHAPTER- I 1 -24 INTRODUCTION 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Kumarappa-Reckless Award Ora on Prof
    Kumarappa-Reckless Award Oraon delivered at 40th All India Conference of Indian Society of Criminology on 19th January, 2018 at Gujarat Naonal Law University Gandhinagar on Decoding Conversaons and Restang Criminology in India IETY OF OC CR S IM N O IA N D O N L I O E G H Y T By Prof.(Dr.) G.S. Bajpai Professor of Criminology & Criminal Jusce Chairperson, Centre for Criminology & Vicmology & Registrar, Naonal Law University Delhi Kumarappa-Reckless Award Oraon delivered during the 40th All India Conference of the Indian Society of Criminology on January 19, 2018 at the Gujarat Naonal Law University, Gandhinagar Decoding Conversaons and Restang Criminology in India By G.S. Bajpai1 It's indeed a special moment for me!! With all humility and a great sense of achievement, I thank all those instrumental in having me here to receive the highest honor in the field of criminology in India. I also take this opportunity to express my gratude to the fraternity in the Indian Society of Criminology, my teachers, and colleagues and well-wishers who at different stages of career supported me to the extent that I am here today before you for delivering this presgious oraon. The Present Paper Nothing happens on the earth that does not challenge criminological imaginaon. Criminology is a mysterious discipline. Other than in the formal world, it exists more and more in popular conversaons of the laymen when they try to understand crime and criminals in their own extraordinary ways. The people in general have an amazing sense in India to explain criminality around them.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download Letter
    WWW.LIVELAW.IN To, The Hon’ble Chief Justice, Allahabad High Court, Nyaya Marg, Canton, Dhoomanganj, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh 211001 Subject:- Letter Petition in reference to Police brutality, fake encounter & state of lawlessness in our state of Uttar Pradesh. That the instant petition raises the question about the validity of the tool of extrajudicial killings devised and reported as encounter which is resorted to by a large section of the Indian Police. This raises question:- 1. “Whether Police encounters are exception to the rule of law”. 2. Whether Police encounter is exception to the well settled principal of Presumption of innocence, until proven guilty. 3. Whether Police encounter is exception to the RIGHT TO LIFE & Due procedure? That the Article 21 of the COI which reads as;- “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except in accordance with the procedure established by law” This means that before depriving a person of his life, the state is required to put the person on trial in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal law. Hon’ble Supreme Court in plethora of cases stated that “fair trial & opportunity to defend is a Constitutional right and in case cannot be compromised”. WWW.LIVELAW.IN Fake encounter on the other hand, completely sidestep and circumvent the procedure established by law and hence unconstitutional. There is no second thought to the fact that yes in our society we have some dreaded criminals against whom running a fair trial is difficult, but this vest no right in police machinery to go for encounters as a ultimate option against hardcore criminals & gangsters.
    [Show full text]
  • “Everyone Has Been Silenced”; Police
    EVERYONE HAS BEEN SILENCED Police Excesses Against Anti-CAA Protesters In Uttar Pradesh, And The Post-violence Reprisal Citizens Against Hate Citizens against Hate (CAH) is a Delhi-based collective of individuals and groups committed to a democratic, secular and caring India. It is an open collective, with members drawn from a wide range of backgrounds who are concerned about the growing hold of exclusionary tendencies in society, and the weakening of rule of law and justice institutions. CAH was formed in 2017, in response to the rising trend of hate mobilisation and crimes, specifically the surge in cases of lynching and vigilante violence, to document violations, provide victim support and engage with institutions for improved justice and policy reforms. From 2018, CAH has also been working with those affected by NRC process in Assam, documenting exclusions, building local networks, and providing practical help to victims in making claims to rights. Throughout, we have also worked on other forms of violations – hate speech, sexual violence and state violence, among others in Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, Bihar and beyond. Our approach to addressing the justice challenge facing particularly vulnerable communities is through research, outreach and advocacy; and to provide practical help to survivors in their struggles, also nurturing them to become agents of change. This citizens’ report on police excesses against anti-CAA protesters in Uttar Pradesh is the joint effort of a team of CAH made up of human rights experts, defenders and lawyers. Members of the research, writing and advocacy team included (in alphabetical order) Abhimanyu Suresh, Adeela Firdous, Aiman Khan, Anshu Kapoor, Devika Prasad, Fawaz Shaheen, Ghazala Jamil, Mohammad Ghufran, Guneet Ahuja, Mangla Verma, Misbah Reshi, Nidhi Suresh, Parijata Banerjee, Rehan Khan, Sajjad Hassan, Salim Ansari, Sharib Ali, Sneha Chandna, Talha Rahman and Vipul Kumar.
    [Show full text]
  • Nderstanding the Religious Nature of Terrorism in India: Four Case Studies with an Analysis for Proposals and Resolution
    UNDERSTANDING THE RELIGIOUS NATURE OF TERRORISM IN INDIA: FOUR CASE STUDIES WITH AN ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSALS AND RESOLUTION BY KAILASH KUMAR CHATRY A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion School of Historical Studies College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham 17 October 2012. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT India has faced the challenge of religious terrorism for almost three decades. This phenomenon – in-spite of the Indian government’s comprehensive effort to contain it – has been spreading its vicious influence and expanding its support base among the conflicting religious communities in many parts of the country. The existing views, in regard to the rise of religious terrorism, suggest that economic, socio-political or geo-political issues (that cropped up during the post-partition period) are responsible for the birth of the problem. However, so far no study is done collectively on the four (Sikh, Kashmiri Muslim, Hindu and Naga Christian) religious communities to explain the cause of the problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Terror Law in India
    f ANTI-TERROR LAW IN INDIA A STUDY OF STATUTES AND JUDGMENTS , 2001 – 2014 Srijoni Sen Rukmini Das Raadhika Gupta Vrinda Bhandari June 2015 www.vidhilegalpolicy.in Authors Acknowledgments Srijoni Sen is a Senior Resident Fellow at the We would like to thank Sakshi Aravind, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy Abhinav Sekhri, Arshu John and Shreya Prakash whose valuable assistance was Rukmini Das is a PhD candidate and research instrumental in the writing of this report. assistant at the Faculty of Law, University of Geneva. She is a Non-Resident Expert at Vidhi Raadhika Gupta is a Consultant at the National Skill Development Agency, New Delhi, and a Non-Resident Expert at Vidhi Vrinda Bhandari is an Advocate at the High Court of Delhi, and a Non-Resident Expert at Vidhi © Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, 2015 Cover image by Dcastor is licensed under CC3.0. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER I: OVERVIEW OF LAWS ........................................................................ 6 A. Laws Governing Substantive Offences ............................................................. 6 B. Laws Governing Investigation and Trial ......................................................... 11 1. Investigation ........................................................................................ 11 2. Courts ................................................................................................ 13 3. Criminal Procedure ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]