DOCSLIB.ORG

Revision Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revision Draft Marine Stewardship Council fisheries assessments WESTERN ASTURIAS OCTOPUS TRAPS FISHERY OF ARTISANAL COFRADÍAS Public domain illustration from: Comingio Merculiano (1845-1915) PUBLIC COMMENT DRAFT REPORT 15th June 2021 Bureau Veritas Certification Holding SAS Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) Contact: [email protected] Assessment team in the PCDR Angel F. González González, Gonzalo Macho Rivero, Gemma Quílez Asociación de armadores de la pesquería de pulpo con certificado Fishery client de sostenibilidad (ARPESOS) Assessment Type First Reassessment 1 Contents 1 Contents __________________________________________________________________________ 2 2 Glossary ___________________________________________________________________________ 4 3 Executive summary __________________________________________________________________ 5 4 Report details ______________________________________________________________________ 8 4.1 Authorship and peer review details ________________________________________________________ 8 4.2 Version details ________________________________________________________________________ 10 5 Unit(s) of Assessment and Certification and results overview _______________________________ 11 5.1 Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification ____________________________________________ 11 5.1.1 Unit(s) of Assessment __________________________________________________________________________ 11 5.1.2 Unit(s) of Certification __________________________________________________________________________ 12 5.2 Assessment results overview ____________________________________________________________ 12 5.2.1 Determination, formal conclusion and agreement ___________________________________________________ 12 5.2.2 Principle level scores ___________________________________________________________________________ 12 5.2.3 Summary of conditions _________________________________________________________________________ 13 5.2.4 Recommendations _____________________________________________________________________________ 14 6 Traceability and eligibility ___________________________________________________________ 14 6.1 Eligibility date ________________________________________________________________________ 14 6.2 Traceability within the fishery ___________________________________________________________ 14 6.2.1 Description of the tracking, tracing and segregation systems within the fishery ____________________________ 14 6.2.2 Determination of risk associated to traceability factors prior to entering CoC _____________________________ 16 6.3 Eligibility to enter further chains of custody ________________________________________________ 17 6.4 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to enter further chains of custody ___ 18 7 Scoring ___________________________________________________________________________ 18 7.1 Summary of Performance Indicator level scores _____________________________________________ 18 7.2 Principle 1 ___________________________________________________________________________ 20 7.2.1 Principle 1 background _________________________________________________________________________ 20 7.2.1.1 Outline of the target species ________________________________________________________________ 20 7.2.1.1.1 Biology and distribution _________________________________________________________________ 20 7.2.1.1.2 Reproduction __________________________________________________________________________ 22 7.2.1.1.3 Age and growth ________________________________________________________________________ 24 7.2.1.1.4 Trophic Ecology ________________________________________________________________________ 26 7.2.1.1.5 Environment & climate change ___________________________________________________________ 28 7.2.1.2 Stock structure of Octopus vulgaris and metapopulation = sub-population rationale ___________________ 30 7.2.1.3 Overview of the Octopus vulgaris fisheries and stock assessments __________________________________ 33 7.2.1.3.2 Octopus vulgaris stock assessment ________________________________________________________ 35 7.2.1.3.3 Octopus trap fishery in Asturias ___________________________________________________________ 37 7.2.2 Catch profiles _________________________________________________________________________________ 41 7.2.3 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and catch data _________________________________________________________ 45 7.2.4 Principle 1 Performance Indicator scores and rationales ______________________________________________ 47 PI 1.1.1 – Stock status ____________________________________________________________________________ 47 PI 1.1.2 – Stock rebuilding _________________________________________________________________________ 53 PI 1.2.1 – Harvest strategy _________________________________________________________________________ 54 PI 1.2.2 – Harvest control rules and tools _____________________________________________________________ 62 PI 1.2.3 – Information and monitoring _______________________________________________________________ 65 PI 1.2.4 – Assessment of stock status ________________________________________________________________ 70 7.3 Principle 2 ___________________________________________________________________________ 74 7.3.1 Principle 2 background _________________________________________________________________________ 74 Western Asturias Octopus Traps Fishery of Artisanal Cofradías – PCDR page 2 7.3.1.1 Species assignment to MSC P2 categories ______________________________________________________ 74 7.3.1.1.1 UoA catch composition based on on-board observer program data ______________________________ 74 7.3.1.1.2 Bait species ___________________________________________________________________________ 77 7.3.1.1.3 P2 species scoring elements ______________________________________________________________ 80 7.3.1.2 Primary species ___________________________________________________________________________ 82 7.3.1.2.1 Primary species caught by the UoA ________________________________________________________ 82 7.3.1.2.2 Primary bait species ____________________________________________________________________ 82 7.3.1.3 Secondary species ________________________________________________________________________ 85 7.3.1.3.1 Secondary species caught by the UoA ______________________________________________________ 85 7.3.1.3.2 Secondary bait species __________________________________________________________________ 86 7.3.1.4 ETP species ______________________________________________________________________________ 86 7.3.1.5 Marine habitats and ecosystems _____________________________________________________________ 88 7.3.1.5.1 Habitats where the octopus trap fishery operates ____________________________________________ 88 7.3.1.5.2 Permanent and temporary area closures ___________________________________________________ 92 7.3.1.5.3 Trophic ecology of the common octopus ____________________________________________________ 93 7.3.1.5.4 Ghost fishing __________________________________________________________________________ 95 7.3.1.5.5 Bay of Biscay and the Iberian Coast Ecoregion _______________________________________________ 96 7.3.2 Principle 2 Performance Indicator scores and rationales _____________________________________________ 101 PI 2.1.1 – Primary species outcome ________________________________________________________________ 101 PI 2.1.2 – Primary species management strategy ______________________________________________________ 105 PI 2.1.3 – Primary species information ______________________________________________________________ 109 PI 2.2.1 – Secondary species outcome ______________________________________________________________ 111 PI 2.2.2 – Secondary species management strategy ___________________________________________________ 113 PI 2.2.3 – Secondary species information ____________________________________________________________ 117 PI 2.3.1 – ETP species outcome ____________________________________________________________________ 120 PI 2.3.2 – ETP species management strategy _________________________________________________________ 123 PI 2.4.1 – Habitats outcome ______________________________________________________________________ 128 PI 2.4.2 – Habitats management strategy ____________________________________________________________ 131 PI 2.4.3 – Habitats information ____________________________________________________________________ 134 PI 2.5.1 – Ecosystem outcome _____________________________________________________________________ 136 PI 2.5.2 – Ecosystem management strategy __________________________________________________________ 138 PI 2.5.3 – Ecosystem information __________________________________________________________________ 140 7.4 Principle 3 __________________________________________________________________________ 142 7.4.1 Principle 3 background ________________________________________________________________________ 142 7.4.1.1 Area of operation of the fishery_____________________________________________________________ 142 7.4.1.2 Jurisdiction of the fishery __________________________________________________________________ 143 7.4.1.3 Particulars of the recognised groups with interests in the UoA ____________________________________ 144 7.4.1.4 Consultations, decision-making process or processes and recognised participant _____________________ 146 7.4.1.5 Details of other non-MSC fishery users or activities, which could affect the UoA, and arrangements for liaison and co-ordination
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Review of Southern Ocean Squids Using Nets and Beaks
    Marine Biodiversity (2020) 50:98 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-020-01113-4 REVIEW A review of Southern Ocean squids using nets and beaks Yves Cherel1 Received: 31 May 2020 /Revised: 31 August 2020 /Accepted: 3 September 2020 # Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung 2020 Abstract This review presents an innovative approach to investigate the teuthofauna from the Southern Ocean by combining two com- plementary data sets, the literature on cephalopod taxonomy and biogeography, together with predator dietary investigations. Sixty squids were recorded south of the Subtropical Front, including one circumpolar Antarctic (Psychroteuthis glacialis Thiele, 1920), 13 circumpolar Southern Ocean, 20 circumpolar subantarctic, eight regional subantarctic, and 12 occasional subantarctic species. A critical evaluation removed five species from the list, and one species has an unknown taxonomic status. The 42 Southern Ocean squids belong to three large taxonomic units, bathyteuthoids (n = 1 species), myopsids (n =1),andoegopsids (n = 40). A high level of endemism (21 species, 50%, all oegopsids) characterizes the Southern Ocean teuthofauna. Seventeen families of oegopsids are represented, with three dominating families, onychoteuthids (seven species, five endemics), ommastrephids (six species, three endemics), and cranchiids (five species, three endemics). Recent improvements in beak identification and taxonomy allowed making new correspondence between beak and species names, such as Galiteuthis suhmi (Hoyle 1886), Liguriella podophtalma Issel, 1908, and the recently described Taonius notalia Evans, in prep. Gonatus phoebetriae beaks were synonymized with those of Gonatopsis octopedatus Sasaki, 1920, thus increasing significantly the number of records and detailing the circumpolar distribution of this rarely caught Southern Ocean squid. The review extends considerably the number of species, including endemics, recorded from the Southern Ocean, but it also highlights that the corresponding species to two well-described beaks (Moroteuthopsis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • National Life Stories an Oral History of British
    NATIONAL LIFE STORIES AN ORAL HISTORY OF BRITISH SCIENCE Professor Bob Dickson Interviewed by Dr Paul Merchant C1379/56 © The British Library Board http://sounds.bl.uk This interview and transcript is accessible via http://sounds.bl.uk . © The British Library Board. Please refer to the Oral History curators at the British Library prior to any publication or broadcast from this document. Oral History The British Library 96 Euston Road London NW1 2DB United Kingdom +44 (0)20 7412 7404 [email protected] Every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of this transcript, however no transcript is an exact translation of the spoken word, and this document is intended to be a guide to the original recording, not replace it. Should you find any errors please inform the Oral History curators. © The British Library Board http://sounds.bl.uk British Library Sound Archive National Life Stories Interview Summary Sheet Title Page Ref no: C1379/56 Collection title: An Oral History of British Science Interviewee’s surname: Dickson Title: Professor Interviewee’s forename: Bob Sex: Male Occupation: oceanographer Date and place of birth: 4th December, 1941, Edinburgh, Scotland Mother’s occupation: Housewife , art Father’s occupation: Schoolmaster teacher (part time) [chemistry] Dates of recording, Compact flash cards used, tracks [from – to]: 9/8/11 [track 1-3], 16/12/11 [track 4- 7], 28/10/11 [track 8-12], 14/2/13 [track 13-15] Location of interview: CEFAS [Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science], Lowestoft, Suffolk Name of interviewer: Dr Paul Merchant Type of recorder: Marantz PMD661 Recording format : 661: WAV 24 bit 48kHz Total no.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Page Graphics.Cdr
    Ecological effects of the Lundy No-take Zone: The first five years (2003-2007) MG Hoskin, RA Coleman & L von Carlshausen March 2009 Final Report to Natural England, DEFRA & WWF-UK This report should be cited as: Hoskin, M.G., R.A Coleman, & L. von Carlshausen (2009). Ecological effects of the Lundy No-Take Zone: the first five years (2003-2007). Report to Natural England, DEFRA and WWF-UK. © Hoskin, M.G 1., R.A Coleman 2, & L. von Carlshausen 1 2009 1 Dr Miles Hoskin BSc (Hons), PhD, MIEEM Liz von Carlshausen BSc (Hons) Coastal & Marine Environmental Research (CMER) 2 Raleigh Place Falmouth Cornwall England Tel: +44 (0)1326 219 498 E-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] 2 Professor Ross Coleman Centre for Research on Ecological Impacts of Coastal Cities (EICC) Marine Ecology Laboratories (A11) University of Sydney Sydney NSW 2006 Australia Tel: +61(0)2 9351 2039 Fax: +61(0)2 9351 6713 E-mail: [email protected] Web page: http://www.eicc.bio.usyd.edu.au Ecological effects of the Lundy NTZ: 2003 to 2007 Hoskin et al., 2009 Acknowledgements This work was made possible by funds from Natural England and match-funding from the ‘Financial Instruments for Fisheries Guidance’ (FIFG) grant scheme administered by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). Additional funding or contributions in-kind were provided by the World Wildlife Fund (UK), the Esmée Fairburn Foundation, the Marine Biological Association of the UK, the University of Plymouth, the University of Sydney and Coastal & Marine Environmental Research (CMER).
    [Show full text]
  • PUB. 143 Sailing Directions (Enroute)
    PUB. 143 SAILING DIRECTIONS (ENROUTE) ★ WEST COAST OF EUROPE AND NORTHWEST AFRICA ★ Prepared and published by the NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Springfield, Virginia © COPYRIGHT 2014 BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT NO COPYRIGHT CLAIMED UNDER TITLE 17 U.S.C. 2014 FIFTEENTH EDITION For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: http://bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 II Preface date of the publication shown above. Important information to amend material in the publication is updated as needed and 0.0 Pub. 143, Sailing Directions (Enroute) West Coast of Europe available as a downloadable corrected publication from the and Northwest Africa, Fifteenth Edition, 2014 is issued for use NGA Maritime Domain web site. in conjunction with Pub. 140, Sailing Directions (Planning Guide) North Atlantic Ocean and Adjacent Seas. Companion 0.0NGA Maritime Domain Website volumes are Pubs. 141, 142, 145, 146, 147, and 148. http://msi.nga.mil/NGAPortal/MSI.portal 0.0 Digital Nautical Charts 1 and 8 provide electronic chart 0.0 coverage for the area covered by this publication. 0.0 Courses.—Courses are true, and are expressed in the same 0.0 This publication has been corrected to 4 October 2014, manner as bearings. The directives “steer” and “make good” a including Notice to Mariners No. 40 of 2014. Subsequent course mean, without exception, to proceed from a point of or- updates have corrected this publication to 24 September 2016, igin along a track having the identical meridianal angle as the including Notice to Mariners No.
    [Show full text]
  • Come Home To
    Come home to Beautiful towns to visit in Asturias asturiastourism.co.uk 2 #AsturianCities Introduction #AsturianCities EDITING: SOCIEDAD PÚBLICA DE GESTIÓN Y PROMOCIÓN TURÍSTICA Y CULTURAL DEL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS, SAU Design: Arrontes y Barrera Estudio de Publicidad Layout: Paco Currás Diseñadores Maps: Da Vinci Estudio Gráfico Texts: Regina Buitrago Martínez-Colubi Translation: Morote Traducciones, SL. Photography: Front cover: Amar Hernández. Inside pages: Amar Hernández, Camilo Alonso, Juan de Tury, Juanjo Arrojo, Marcos Morilla, Noé Baranda, Paco Currás, Pelayo Lacazette, Ayuntamiento de Avilés, Ayuntamiento de Oviedo, Divertia Gijón SA and own Files. Imprenta: Imprenta Mundo SLU D.L.: AS 03020-2018 © CONSEJERÍA DE EMPLEO, INDUSTRIA Y TURISMO DEL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS asturiastourism.co.uk #AsturianCities 1 Asturias, a spectacular region. A historic The lifestyle and mild Atlantic climate of Principality located in the north of Spain. A Asturias allows Asturians and visitors to beautiful, natural tapestry coloured green, enjoy life outdoors. The three cities have blue and grey. The land with a black coal crowded areas of wide terraces, in their city mining heart. It is heaven on earth. Visiting centres as well as in their neighbourhoods. Asturias will fascinate you. It is an experience This contributes to the enjoyment of relaxing, you’ll never forget. friendly meet-ups and the feeling of living the good life that can be soaked up in this land. Its urban area is made up of three cities with a great history and personality: Avilés, Gijón/ It is easy to enjoy all of them, only twenty Xixón and Oviedo (the capital). These cities minutes away by motorway, and public form an easily accessible urban area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Life History of Fish
    Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 191: 339-344. 1989 Johan Hjort - founder of modern Norwegian fishery research and pioneer in recruitment thinking P. Solemdal and M. Sinclair Solemdal, P., and Sinclair, M. 1989. Johan Hjort - founder of modern Norwegian fishery research and pioneer in recruitment thinking. - Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 191: 339-344. A description of some major scientific controversies prior to 1914 that influenced the development of Hjort's thinking is presented. Particular attention is given to the difficulties encountered with the migration theory (which explained interannual fluctuations in fisheries landings in the North Atlantic) and the debate on local populations, overfishing, and the role of hatcheries in increasing yields from marine fisheries. The steps leading to his classic 1914 paper are summarized and highlights of the 1914 paper are discussed. It is concluded that Hjort’s work between 1893 and 1917 led to a shift in emphasis from adult migration to early life history processes in the study of interannual fluctuations in yield. P. Solemdal: Institute o f Marine Fisheries Research, P.O. Box 1870, N-5024 Bergen, Norway. M. Sinclair: Department o f Fisheries and Oceans, Halifax Fisheries Research Laboratory, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 257, Canada. Introduction Problems in the 1890s The great fluctuations in the fisheries of northern The major scientific problem facing marine biologists Europe at the end of the last century had enormous and oceanographers in the latter half of the 19th century influence on the economy. It was at this time that was an explanation of the interannual fluctuations in the question of overfishing was formulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Stylet Elemental Signatures Indicate Population Structure in a Holobenthic Octopus Species, Octopus Pallidus
    Vol. 371: 1–10, 2008 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published November 19 doi: 10.3354/meps07722 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS FEATURE ARTICLE Stylet elemental signatures indicate population structure in a holobenthic octopus species, Octopus pallidus Zoë A. Doubleday1,*, Gretta T. Pecl1, Jayson M. Semmens1, Leonid Danyushevsky2 1Marine Research Laboratories, Tasmanian Aquaculture & Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia 2Centre for Ore Deposit Research, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 79, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia ABSTRACT: Targeted trace elemental analysis was used to investigate the population structure and disper- sal patterns of the holobenthic octopus species Octopus pallidus (Hoyle, 1885). Multi-elemental signatures within the pre-hatch region of the stylet (an internal ‘shell’) were used to determine the common origins and levels of connectivity of individuals collected from 5 locations in Tasmania. To determine whether hatchling elemental signatures could be used as tags for natal ori- gin, hatchling stylets from 3 of the 5 locations were also analysed. We analyzed 12 elements using laser ablation inductively-coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA- ICPMS). Of the 12 elements, 7 were excellent spatial discriminators. There was evidence of high-level struc- turing with distinct groupings between all sites (the 2 closest being 85 km apart) within the adult O. pallidus Octopus pallidus, a holobenthic species found in south-east population, suggesting that all adults had hatched in or Australia near their respective collection sites. The hatchling sig- Photo: Stephen Leporati natures showed significant spatial variation, and a high percentage of individuals could successfully be traced back to their collection locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Octopus Consciousness: the Role of Perceptual Richness
    Review Octopus Consciousness: The Role of Perceptual Richness Jennifer Mather Department of Psychology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada; [email protected] Abstract: It is always difficult to even advance possible dimensions of consciousness, but Birch et al., 2020 have suggested four possible dimensions and this review discusses the first, perceptual richness, with relation to octopuses. They advance acuity, bandwidth, and categorization power as possible components. It is first necessary to realize that sensory richness does not automatically lead to perceptual richness and this capacity may not be accessed by consciousness. Octopuses do not discriminate light wavelength frequency (color) but rather its plane of polarization, a dimension that we do not understand. Their eyes are laterally placed on the head, leading to monocular vision and head movements that give a sequential rather than simultaneous view of items, possibly consciously planned. Details of control of the rich sensorimotor system of the arms, with 3/5 of the neurons of the nervous system, may normally not be accessed to the brain and thus to consciousness. The chromatophore-based skin appearance system is likely open loop, and not available to the octopus’ vision. Conversely, in a laboratory situation that is not ecologically valid for the octopus, learning about shapes and extents of visual figures was extensive and flexible, likely consciously planned. Similarly, octopuses’ local place in and navigation around space can be guided by light polarization plane and visual landmark location and is learned and monitored. The complex array of chemical cues delivered by water and on surfaces does not fit neatly into the components above and has barely been tested but might easily be described as perceptually rich.
    [Show full text]
  • PMNHS Bulletin Number 6, Autumn 2016
    ISSN 2054-7137 BULLETIN of the PORCUPINE MARINE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY Autumn 2016 — Number 6 Bulletin of the Porcupine Marine Natural History Society No. 6 Autumn 2016 Hon. Chairman — Susan Chambers Hon. Secretary — Frances Dipper National Museums Scotland 18 High St 242 West Granton Road Landbeach Edinburgh EH5 1JA Cambridge CB25 9FT 07528 519465 [email protected] [email protected] Hon. Membership Secretary — Roni Robbins Hon. Treasurer — Jon Moore ARTOO Marine Biology Consultants, Ti Cara, Ocean Quay Marina, Point Lane, Belvidere Road, Cosheston, Southampton SO14 5QY Pembroke Dock, [email protected] Pembrokeshire SA72 4UN 01646 687946 Hon. Records Convenor — Julia Nunn [email protected] Cherry Cottage 11 Ballyhaft Road Hon. Editor — Vicki Howe Newtownards White House, Co. Down BT22 2AW Penrhos, [email protected] Raglan NP15 2LF 07779 278841 — Tammy Horton [email protected] Hon. Web-site Officer National Oceanography Centre, Waterfront Campus, Newsletter Layout & Design European Way, — Teresa Darbyshire Southampton SO14 3ZH Department of Natural Sciences, 023 80 596 352 Amgueddfa Cymru — National Museum Wales, [email protected] Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NP Porcupine MNHS welcomes new members- scientists, 029 20 573 222 students, divers, naturalists and lay people. [email protected] We are an informal society interested in marine natural history and recording particularly in the North Atlantic and ‘Porcupine Bight’. Members receive 2 Bulletins per year which include proceedings
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Population Structuring in Sympatric Octopus Species with and Without a Pelagic Larval Stage
    Vol. 486: 203–212, 2013 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published July 12 doi: 10.3354/meps10330 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Comparison of population structuring in sympatric octopus species with and without a pelagic larval stage Kaitlyn L. Higgins1,*, Jayson M. Semmens2, Zoë A. Doubleday3, Christopher P. Burridge1 1School of Zoology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 5, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia 2Fisheries, Aquaculture and Coasts Centre, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia 3Southern Seas Ecology Laboratories, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, DX650 418, South Australia 5005, Australia ABSTRACT: An understanding of the influence of life history on dispersal capability is central to a range of disciplines within ecology and evolution. While studies have investigated this question by contrasting spatial population structuring in taxa that differ in life history, in the vast majority such comparisons differ in space and time, and therefore environmental factors may have con- tributed. Here, population structure of a holobenthic (i.e. direct developing) octopus, Octopus pal- lidus, was investigated genetically. This was compared to existing genetic data for a co-occurring merobenthic (i.e. planktonic larvae) species, Macroctopus maorum. Greater spatial genetic struc- turing was evident in O. pallidus than M. maorum. Patterns were consistent with isolation by dis- tance in O. pallidus, but appeared related to oceanographic circulation systems in M. maorum, suggesting distance-dependent adult dispersal and current-mediated larval dispersal, respec- tively. Genetic population structuring in O. pallidus also largely corroborated inferences based on stylet microchemistry, indicating the utility of these environmental signatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Habitat Selection of Three Cryptobenthic Clingfish
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Factors Influencing Habitat Selection of Three Cryptobenthic Clingfish Species in the Shallow North Adriatic Sea Domen Trkov 1,2,* , Danijel Ivajnšiˇc 3,4 , Marcelo Kovaˇci´c 5 and Lovrenc Lipej 1,2 1 Marine Biology Station Piran, National Institute of Biology, Fornaˇce41, 6330 Piran, Slovenia; [email protected] 2 Jožef Stefan Institute and Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova Cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 3 Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Koroška Cesta 160, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Arts, University of Maribor, Koroška Cesta 160, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia 5 Natural History Museum Rijeka, Lorenzov Prolaz 1, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Cryptobenthic fishes were often overlooked in the past due to their cryptic lifestyle, so knowledge of their ecology is still incomplete. One of the most poorly studied taxa of fishes in the Mediterranean Sea is clingfish. In this paper we examine the habitat preferences of three clingfish species (Lepadogaster lepadogaster, L. candolii, and Apletodon incognitus) occurring in the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic). The results show that all three species have a cryptic lifestyle and are well- segregated based on their depth distribution and macro- and microhabitat preferences. L. lepadogaster inhabits shallow waters of the lower mediolittoral and upper infralittoral, where it occurs on rocky bottoms under stones. L. candolii similarly occurs in the rocky infralittoral under stones, but below the Citation: Trkov, D.; Ivajnšiˇc,D.; lower distribution limit of L. lepadogaster, and in seagrass meadows, where it occupies empty seashells.
    [Show full text]