Archimedes NEW STUDIES in the HISTORY and PHILOSOPHY of SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 30

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Archimedes NEW STUDIES in the HISTORY and PHILOSOPHY of SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 30 A MASTER OF SCIENCE HISTORY Archimedes NEW STUDIES IN THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 30 EDITOR JED Z. BUCHWALD, Dreyfuss Professor of History, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. ASSOCIATE EDITORS FOR MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES JEREMY GRAY, The Faculty of Mathematics and Computing, The Open University, Buckinghamshire, UK. TILMAN SAUER, California Institute of Technology ASSOCIATE EDITORS FOR BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES SHARON KINGSLAND, Department of History of Science and Technology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. MANFRED LAUBICHLER, Arizona State University ADVISORY BOARD FOR MATHEMATICS, PHYSICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY HENK BOS, University of Utrecht MORDECHAI FEINGOLD, California Institute of Technology ALLAN D. FRANKLIN, University of Colorado at Boulder KOSTAS GAVROGLU, National Technical University of Athens PAUL HOYNINGEN-HUENE, Leibniz University in Hannover TREVOR LEVERE, University of Toronto JESPER LU¨ TZEN, Copenhagen University WILLIAM NEWMAN, Indiana University, Bloomington LAWRENCE PRINCIPE, The Johns Hopkins University JU¨ RGEN RENN, Max-Planck-Institut fu¨r Wissenschaftsgeschichte ALEX ROLAND, Duke University ALAN SHAPIRO, University of Minnesota NOEL SWERDLOW, California Institute of Technology, USA ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOLOGY MICHAEL DIETRICH, Dartmouth College, USA MICHEL MORANGE, Centre Cavaille`s, Ecole Normale Supe´rieure, Paris HANS-JO¨ RG RHEINBERGER, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin NANCY SIRAISI, Hunter College of the City University of New York Archimedes has three fundamental goals; to further the integration of the histories of science and technology with one another: to investigate the technical, social and practical histories of specific developments in science and technology; and finally, where possible and desirable, to bring the histories of science and technology into closer contact with the philosophy of science. To these ends, each volume will have its own theme and title and will be planned by one or more members of the Advisory Board in consultation with the editor. Although the volumes have specific themes, the series itself will not be limited to one or even to a few particular areas. Its subjects include any of the sciences, ranging from biology through physics, all aspects of technology, broadly construed, as well as historically-engaged philosophy of science or technology. Taken as awhole,Archimedes will be of interest to historians, philosophers, and scientists, as well as to those in business and industry who seek to understand how science and industry have come to be so strongly linked. For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/5644 Jed Z. Buchwald Editor A Master of Science History Essays in Honor of Charles Coulston Gillispie 13 Editor Prof. Dr. Jed Z. Buchwald California Institute of Technology Division of Humanities & Social Sciences E. California Blvd. 1200 91125 Pasadena California USA [email protected] ISSN 1385-0180 ISBN 978-94-007-2626-0 e-ISBN 978-94-007-2627-7 DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-2627-7 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011944095 # Springer ScienceþBusiness Media B.V. 2012 No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer ScienceþBusiness Media (www.springer.com) Charles and Emily Gillispie. Photo by Ivor Grattan-Guinness Born in 1918, Charles Gillispie graduated from Wesleyan University in 1940 and, following service during the Second World War, received his PhD from Harvard in 1949. He thereafter joined the Department of History at Princeton University, where he remained until his retirement as Dayton-Stockton Profes- sor of History, Emeritus in 1987. He has been awarded many honors, including Princeton’s Behrman Prize in the Humanities (1981), the Pfizer Prize (1981) and Sarton Medal (1984) of the History of Science Society, la Me´daille Alexandre Koyre´of the Acade´mie Internationale d’Histoire des Sciences (1985), the Dis- tinguished Alumnus Award of Wesleyan University (1990), the Dibner Award for Distinction in History of Science and Technology (1994), and the Balzan Prize for History and Philosophy of Science (1997). In 2011 he received the D.H.S., Honoris Causa, from Princeton University. Gillispie’s work has ranged widely over science and technology history. He is among the founding members of the discipline whose publications and teaching having influenced generations of historians and readers. We are honored to present these essays by his students and colleagues which were completed on August 6, 2011, the day of his 93rd birthday. Contents Part I Charles Gillispie 1 Publications by Charles Coulston Gillispie ..................... 3 2 A Professional Life in the History of Science ................... 15 Charles Coulston Gillispie 3 A Career in the History of Science as a Student of Charles Gillispie....................................... 25 Seymour H. Mauskopf 4 Charles Gillispie in the Digital Age .......................... 37 Jane Maienschein and Manfred D. Laubichler Part II Archaeology 5 Peking Man: New Light on an Old Discovery .................. 49 Tore Frängsmyr 6 The Puzzle Picture of Lucretius: A Thriller from Herculaneum ..... 63 Knut Kleve Part III Astronomy 7 Urania Propitia, Tabulae Rudophinae faciles redditae a Maria Cunitia Beneficent Urania, the Adaptation of the Rudolphine Tables by Maria Cunitz................................................. 81 N.M. Swerdlow 8 Simplicity in the Copernican Revolution: Galileo, Descartes, Newton 123 David B. Wilson vii viii Contents Part IV Chemistry 9 The Weekday Chemist: The Training of Aleksandr Borodin ....... 137 Michael D. Gordin Part V Geology and Natural Theology 10 The Genesis of Historical Research on the History of Geology, with Thoughts About Kirwan, de Luc, and Whiggery................. 167 David Oldroyd 11 Five Discourses of Bible and Science 1750–2000 ................ 179 Nicolaas A. Rupke 12 ‘‘Natural Theology of Industry’’ in Seventeenth-Century China?: Ideas About the Role of Heaven in Production Techniques in Song Yingxing’s Heaven’s Work in Opening Things (Tiangong kaiwu) ............ 197 Yung Sik Kim Part VI Mathematics 13 On the Role of the Ecole Polytechnique, 1794–1914, with Especial Reference to Mathematics ................................. 217 Ivor Grattan-Guinness 14 The Notion of Variation in Leibniz........................... 235 Eberhard Knobloch 15 Founding Acts and Major Turning-Points in Arab Mathematics .... 253 Roshdi Rashed Part VII Medicine and Health 16 Chemotherapy by Design .................................. 275 John E. Lesch 17 American Health Reformers and the Social Sciences in the Twentieth Century ............................................... 297 Evan M. Melhado 18 Quantity and Polity: Asylum Statistics and the Drive for Medical Evidence ............................................... 327 Theodore M. Porter Contents ix 19 The Question of Efficacy in the History of Medicine ............. 341 Nathan Sivin Part VIII Science and Industry in France 20 Secrecy, Industry and Science. French Glassmaking in the Eighteenth Century ............................................... 357 Marco Beretta 21 Balloons, Hydraulic Machines and Steam Engines at War and Peace: Jean-Pierre Campmas, a Visionary or an Inefficient Inventor? ..... 367 Patrice Bret 22 Cauchy’s Theory of Dispersion Anticipated by Fresnel............ 399 Jed Z. Buchwald 23 Sadi Carnot on Political Economy. Science, Morals, and Public Policy in Restoration France ..................................... 417 Robert Fox Index ..................................................... 429 Contributors Marco Beretta University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, [email protected] Patrice Bret Centre Alexandre Koyre´– Centre de recherches en histoire des sciences et des techniques, Paris, France, [email protected] Jed Z. Buchwald Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA, [email protected] Robert Fox Museum of the History of Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, [email protected] Tore Fra¨ngsmyr Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, [email protected] Charles Coulston Gillispie Department of History, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA, [email protected] Michael D. Gordin Department of History, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA, [email protected] Ivor Grattan-Guinness Middlesex University Business School, London, UK, [email protected] Yung Sik Kim Department of Asian History and Program in History and Philosophy of Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea, [email protected] Knut Kleve University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, [email protected] Eberhard Knobloch Technische Universita¨ t, Berlin, Germany, [email protected] Manfred D. Laubichler Center for Biology and Society, Arizona State Univer- sity, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA; Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA, [email protected] John E. Lesch University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, [email protected] xi xii Contributors Jane Maienschein
Recommended publications
  • A Master of Science History (2012)
    A MASTER OF SCIENCE HISTORY Archimedes NEW STUDIES IN THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 30 EDITOR JED Z. BUCHWALD, Dreyfuss Professor of History, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. ASSOCIATE EDITORS FOR MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES JEREMY GRAY, The Faculty of Mathematics and Computing, The Open University, Buckinghamshire, UK. TILMAN SAUER, California Institute of Technology ASSOCIATE EDITORS FOR BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES SHARON KINGSLAND, Department of History of Science and Technology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. MANFRED LAUBICHLER, Arizona State University ADVISORY BOARD FOR MATHEMATICS, PHYSICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY HENK BOS, University of Utrecht MORDECHAI FEINGOLD, California Institute of Technology ALLAN D. FRANKLIN, University of Colorado at Boulder KOSTAS GAVROGLU, National Technical University of Athens PAUL HOYNINGEN-HUENE, Leibniz University in Hannover TREVOR LEVERE, University of Toronto JESPER LU¨ TZEN, Copenhagen University WILLIAM NEWMAN, Indiana University, Bloomington LAWRENCE PRINCIPE, The Johns Hopkins University JU¨ RGEN RENN, Max-Planck-Institut fu¨r Wissenschaftsgeschichte ALEX ROLAND, Duke University ALAN SHAPIRO, University of Minnesota NOEL SWERDLOW, California Institute of Technology, USA ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOLOGY MICHAEL DIETRICH, Dartmouth College, USA MICHEL MORANGE, Centre Cavaille`s, Ecole Normale Supe´rieure, Paris HANS-JO¨ RG RHEINBERGER, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin NANCY SIRAISI, Hunter College of the City University of New York Archimedes has three fundamental goals; to further the integration of the histories of science and technology with one another: to investigate the technical, social and practical histories of specific developments in science and technology; and finally, where possible and desirable, to bring the histories of science and technology into closer contact with the philosophy of science.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories of Women Stargazers Dr. Dora Musielak
    Stories of Women Stargazers Dr. Dora Musielak March 30, 2009 International Year of Astronomy Space Age 17th Century Copernicus NASA Planet Hunter Blasts into Space! • Kepler, a planet-hunting telescope, rocketed into space March 6, 2009 on a historic voyage to track down other planets like ours in our Galaxy. “Urania, the muse of astronomy, was a woman; and, although most of her devotees have been men, the number of the gentler sex who have achieved success in the cultivation of the science of the stars has been much larger than is usually supposed.” H.J. Mozans (1913) 4 At the beginning…. To people, and to women in particular, astronomy must have been purely contemplative; for then, as today, the glory of the heavens spoke to the soul of woman, which has never changed. Later… Contemplation soon gave place to observational and educational astronomy; woman’s interest intensified, and her desire to understand the rhythms of the sky shaped her intellect… Theano of Samos and Pythagoras c. 550 B.C. Aglaonice or Aganice (c. 200 B.C.) • Woman astronomer considered by some as Greek (daughter of king Hegetoris of Thessaly), others say she was Egyptian, daughter of Pharaoh Sesostris. • Regarded as a sorceress for her ability “to make moon disappear from the sky,” which we interpret to mean she could predict lunar eclipses. • She knew lunar cycle Saros, a period of 18+ years, during which eclipses of Moon recur in nearly same order as during preceding period. • Contemporary of Eratosthenes of Cyrene 8 Hypatia of Alexandria (c. 370 – 415 A.D.) • First woman scholar to attain eminence as mathematician and astronomer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Middle Ages: Social and Political Breakdown (1300- 1527
    Chapter 9 Identifications (The Late Middle Ages: Social and Political Breakdown (1300- 1527) 1. Marsilius of Padua Author of Defender of Peace o Autonomy of secular governments o No earthly punishment for spiritual crimes o Challenge to pope’s authority in secular matters Declared heretical in 1327 2. Lorenzo Valla Fifteenth century Italian writer o Challenged authenticity of the “Apostles’ Creed” o Criticized medieval assumptions about God’s nature, humanity, and society o Heretic? 3. William of Ockham Criticisms of medieval assumptions Similar ideas to Marsilius of Padua o Secular autonomy of kings 4. Estates General Representative council of townspeople and nobles o Creation during Hundred Years’ war o Purpose: secure funds for the king Time in power o After capture of French King John II the Good o Rights similar to English privileged class o Too weak to govern effectively 5. Edward III English King Starter of Hundred Years’ War o Claim to French throne o Vassal of French King Peace of Brétigny under him o End of vassalage o Ransom of John the Good o Renouncement of claim to the throne 6. Jacquerie/ “simple jack” French peasant revolt o During Hundred Years’ War o Cause . Exploitation by nobility . Higher taxes to repair nobles war-ravaged land Named after peasant o Jacques Bonhomme/ “simple jack” Atrocity-filled putdown by nobility 7. Joan of Arc French savior o Executor of God’s will o Slew of victories starting with Orléans o Inspiring o Creator of national unity Abandonment to Burgundians by Charles VII o Execution for heresy o Declaration of innocence (1456) Sainthood (1920) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Events 14Th Century-21St Century
    Events 14th Century-21st Century Emma Eichenlaub Amanda Bricker Sarah Little 1300s-1400s Featuring… Black Death 100 Years’ War Renaissance (early) The Black Death arrived to Port of Messina via ship in October 1347 1.spread through flea bites and rats symptoms included 1.high fever 2.chills 3.vomiting 4.diarrhea 5.delirium 6.black boils oozing pus and blood 7.death over 20 million Europeans would die, accounting for one-third of Europe’s population at the time 1.travelled from Port of Messina to: -Marseilles, France -Rome, Italy -Florence, Italy -Paris, France -Bordeaux, France -Lyon, France -London, England many felt like God was punishing them 100 Years’ War 1337 – 1453 1.France v. England origins 1.Duchy of Guyenne – English owned, but French controlled; English wanted independent control 2.English royal family claimed French crown in 1337 French had bigger military, but English claimed several victories because of advanced military tactics and longbow King John of France 1.forced to accept Treaty of Calais in 1360 -granted complete independence to Duchy of Guyenne (now of France’s territory) his son, Charles V, won back most of the territory by 1380 Henry V of England 1.conquered Normandy in 1418 2.Treaty of Troyes (1420) – attempted to crown himself King of France -failed because the French didn’t want him Charles VII of France brought end of war 1.reclaimed Duchy of Normandy and Guyenne -English finally realized they couldn’t fight the huge French military and backed off -no official peace treaty was ever signed Renaissance
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy in the Correspondence of Johannes Hevelius: a Case Study of Maria Cunitia and Elias Von Löwen
    DOI 10.4467/0023589XKHNT.19.009.10117 Jarosław Włodarczyk L. & A. Birkenmajer Institute for the History of Science Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw “Peripheral” Astronomy in the Correspondence of Johannes Hevelius: A Case Study of Maria Cunitia and Elias von Löwen The letters of Johannes Hevelius reveal a very interesting map of the European astronomy of the 17th century. Signifi cantly, Hevelius was not only a key agent in the transmission of scientifi c information among the main centres which, for example, made Gdańsk equally important as London and Paris for early modern uranography. Hevelius also exchanged letters with astronomers whose achievements are hardly ever discussed within the frame- work of the general history of astronomy. And yet the analysis of their activities allows for the complete reconstruction of 17th century astronomy, including its diversifi cation which stemmed from the tensions between tradition and modernity as well as from the specifi c research interests of minor scholars. One such case is Maria Cunitia (1610–1664) and her husband, Elias von Löwen (Crätschmair; c. 1602–1661) based in Silesia. Maria Cunitia is acknowledged for her Urania Propitia (1650), an innovative adaptation of the mathe- matical astronomy of Johannes Kepler’s Rudolphine Tables. In turn von Löwen authored astronomical calendars and ephemerids. Their correspondence with Hevelius – 22 letters from the years 1648–1654 – constitutes an important source of knowledge about the astronomical ‘background’ which allowed them to complete their published works as well as about the activities of such astronomers from outside the major scientifi c centres. It is my intention to discuss the astronomical content of these letters.
    [Show full text]