DOCSLIB.ORG

Ejection Causes in Military Jet Aircraft in Czechoslovakia and the Czech Republic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ejection Causes in Military Jet Aircraft in Czechoslovakia and the Czech Republic Advances in Military Technology Vol. 14, No. 1 (2019), pp. 5-20 AiMT ISSN 1802-2308, eISSN 2533-4123 DOI 10.3849/aimt.01253 Ejection Causes in Military Jet Aircraft in Czechoslovakia and the Czech Republic O. Zavila 1* and R. Chmelík 2 1 Dept. of Fire Protection, VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic 2 Military Unit 7214, 211 th Squadron, Čáslav, Czech Republic The manuscript was received on 25 May 2018 and was accepted after revision for publication on 4 December 2018. Abstract: The article deals with the causes of ejections of crew members in military jet fighter, fighter ‐trainer and trainer aircraft in the service of Czechoslovakia and the Czech Republic from 1948 until the end of 2016. It presents a list of ejection causes by aircraft types on a timeline as well as historical and technical contexts, facts and development trends of these causes. Importantly, the role of the human factor in the causes of aircraft emergency events associated with ejections is analyzed. The study is accompanied by a unique overview of reference and still accessible information sources on the subject. Keywords: Army of the Czech Republic, ejection, aviation accident, human factor, jet aircraft, cause, statistics 1. Introduction Ejection is a procedure of an emergency exit of the aircraft by the crew using the ejection seat in an emergency situation that cannot be dealt with in other manner and in which the life of the crew is threatened. For the “jet era” of military aviation in the former Czechoslovakia and the present Czech Republic, a total of 209 aviation accidents (hereinafter “AA”) associated with crew ejection could be tracked back. A total of 227 flight staff and 1 non ‐flight staff members ejected. Of this number, a total of 37 flight staff members did not survive the ejection [1-17]. This study aims to give answers to at least three questions: “What were the main factors of the AA causes leading to ejections of crew members?” “Under what circumstances and weather conditions did these AAs occur?” and “Which scenarios or * Corresponding author: Department of Fire Protection, VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Lumírova 13/630, CZ-700 30 Ostrava, Czech Republic. Tel.:+420 597 32 28 93, E-mail: [email protected] 6 O. Zavila and R. Chmelík factors of such scenarios may be timeless, i.e. may present a risk even today, despite technical advances in military aviation?” The authors will try to answer these and other questions in the following paragraphs. 2. Classification of Aviation Accidents and Their Causes The classification of AAs used in the study is based on the contents of the Všeob ‐P‐10 Flight Safety regulation [18], which was in force between 2006 and June 2016, being replaced by the Order of the Minister of Defence No. 13/2016 Journal – Flight Safety of 15 th June 2016 [19]. In this Order of the Minister of Defence, however, substantial changes in definitions, terminology and classification of emergency occurrences in military aviation were made. Therefore, in order to effectively synchronize data from AAs for different periods, the authors of this study chose to use the classification system based on the previous Všeob ‐P‐10 Flight Safety regulation. Most of available technical literature and archival records are based on the contents of this Všeob ‐P‐10 Flight Safety regulation, including the information base from the Information System for Logistics [16], a part of which has been used by the Air Forces of the Czech Armed Forces (hereinafter “AF ACR”) to keep records of emergency occurrences since 1985 to the present day. In conformity with the Všeob ‐P‐10 Flight Safety regulation, AAs are divided into disasters (see Section 3.1), air crashes (see Section 3.2) and damage (see Section 3.3). If the Order of the Minister of Defence No. 13/2016 Journal – Flight Safety [19] classification were used, the three types of occurrences would be categorized uniformly as aviation accidents, which would be detrimental to the clarity of the results interpreted in the study. The causes of all AAs are primarily classified under one of four factors of the event’s main cause: technical factor (hereinafter “TF”), human factor (hereinafter “HF”), environmental factor (hereinafter “EF”) and not found (hereinafter “N”). The human factor can be further subdivided into human factor – flight personnel (hereinafter “HF ‐fp”) and human factor – non ‐flight personnel (hereinafter “HF ‐np”). The technical factor includes operational degradation, design and manufacturing defects and ‘other causes’ that encompass premature destructions of suspension live ammunition (spontaneous destructions of bombs on suspension lugs or premature destructions of missiles near to the aircraft shortly after being launched). The human factor–flight personnel includes errors in command and organization (by in ‐flight personnel, i.e. pilots), errors in navigation (incorrect navigation calculations, calculations of fuel consumption, etc.), piloting (failure in mastering advanced piloting technique), using aviation equipment (unintentional errors in the use of aviation equipment), noncompliance with rules by crew (recklessness in flight), in ‐flight personnel errors (airborne collisions when pilot was hit without his fault by another aircraft) and, rarely, health reasons (such as eating errors or lifestyle), or other causes (such as aircraft destructions in real combats – downing, clashes with airspace violators). The human factor–non ‐flight personnel includes errors in command and organization (by non ‐flight personnel, i.e. air traffic controllers, meteorologists and others), errors in the military unit’s aviation engineering services (deficiencies in Ejection Causes in Military Jet Aircraft in Czechoslovakia 7 and the Czech Republic aircraft operational maintenance, servicing and repairs) and poor quality of service work in manufacturing or repair plants (e.g. deficiencies in overhauls). The environmental factors include weather conditions (atmospheric anomalies, such as lightning strikes) and foreign object ingestion with no fault of the unit’s aviation engineering services (e.g., ingestion of a part of a target for live air target practice). The group of unknown main factors of AA causes includes all cases not conclusively clarified and evidenced. Also, the stage of flight in which the emergency situation was first detected is observed: before take ‐off (“1”), take ‐off (“2”), climb (“3”), flight task (“4”), arrival (“5”), approach maneuvering (“6”), landing (“7”), after landing (“8”) and unknown (“9”). 3. Causes, Interesting Facts, Contexts and Development Trends A total of 209 AAs of various types (38 disaster AAs, 168 crash AAs and 3 damage AAs) were tracked down and analyzed for this study. The causes and links between those aviation accidents are dealt with in the following paragraphs (see Sections 3.1 to 3.4). 3.1. Ejection Causes – Disaster AAs A total of 38 AAs recorded as disasters (see Fig. 1 for an example) associated with the ejection of one or two crew members were tracked down (see Tab. 1). A total of 45 crew members were involved, out of which 41 attempted to eject (4 successfully and survived, 37 unsuccessfully and were killed). The remaining 4 crew members never even attempted to eject and were killed in the cockpit. Fig. 1 The MiG ‐15 disaster – June 16 th , 1958: (1) tailplane debris, (2) KK ‐1 type ejection seat [17] The average age of the 37 crew members killed in the ejection or its aftermath was 31. The youngest pilot was 19, the oldest one was 42. The average number of flight hours for those 37 pilots was approximately 850 with the minimum corresponding to 30 flight hours and the maximum corresponding to 2 360 flight hours. Among the unsuccessfully ejected pilots (37 pilots – 100 %), there were 12 pilots with no skill class (32.4 %), 3 pilots of skill class 3 (8.1 %), 2 pilots of skill class 2 (5.4 %), 16 pilots of skill class 1 (43.2 %) and 4 pilots with no identification of pilot 8 O. Zavila and R. Chmelík skill class (10.8 %). Pilot skill classes were introduced in the Czechoslovak Air Forces drawing on the example of the Soviet Union only in 1954. The average number of Tab. 1 Factors of the main causes of disaster AAs associated with ejection of one or two crew members in 1948–2016 and meteorological conditions under which the AAs occurred (by aircraft type and number of AAs) [1-17] Aircraft type Main cause of the AA (ejection) Meteorological conditions in the AA and version TF HF ‐fp HF‐np EF N NWCD* DWCD* NWCN* DWCN* MiG ‐15 MiG ‐15 4 17 0 0 2 18 3 2 0 MiG ‐15 bis 1 9 2 0 3 10 3 2 0 MiG ‐15 SB 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 MiG ‐15 bis SB 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 MiG ‐15 bis R 1 4 2 0 0 4 2 1 0 UTI MiG ‐15 4 1 0 0 2 4 2 0 1 Total for type 13 32 5 0 7 39 12 5 1 (57 = 100 %) (22.8 %) (56.1 %) (8.8 %) (0 %) (12.3 %) (68.4 %) (21 %) (8.8 %) (1.8 %) MiG ‐21 MiG ‐21 F ‐13 10 6 3 0 2 16 4 1 0 MiG ‐21 PF 4 0 0 0 3 4 2 0 1 MiG ‐21 PFM 1 2 2 2 0 3 3 0 1 MiG ‐21 R 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 MiG ‐21 MA 3 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 MiG ‐21 MF 3 6 0 0 0 3 3 1 2 MiG ‐21 UM 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 Total for type 22 18 6 2 6 34 13 3 4 (54 = 100 %) (40.8 %) (33.3 %) (11.1 %) (3.7 %) (11.1 %) (63 %) (24.1 %) (5.5 %) (7.4 %) Su ‐7 Su ‐7 BM 7 2 1 0 4 12 0 1 1 Su ‐7 BKL 2 2 0 0 3 5 0 1 1 Su ‐7 U 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Total for type 9 4 1 0 8 17 1 2 2 (22 = 100 %) (40.9 %) (18.2 %) (4.5 %) (0 %) (36.4 %) (77.3 %) (4.5 %) (9.1 %) (9.1 %) MiG ‐19 MiG ‐19 S 2 3 1 0 5 6 0 2 3 MiG ‐19 P 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 MiG ‐19 PM 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 Total for type 5 5 1 0 6 7 2 3 5 (17 = 100 %) (29.4 %) (29.4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Robust Fly-By-Wire Under Horizontal Tail Damage
    Robust Fly-by-Wire under Horizontal Tail Damage by Zinhle Dlamini Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Electronic Engineering in the Faculty of Engineering at Stellenbosch University Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa. Supervisor: Prof T Jones December 2016 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: . Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved. i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Aircraft damage modelling was conducted on a Boeing 747 to examine the effects of asymmetric horizontal stabiliser loss on the flight dynamics of a commercial fly-by-Wire (FBW) aircraft. Change in static stability was investigated by analysing how the static margin is reduced as a function of percentage tail loss. It is proven that contrary to intuition, the aircraft is longitudinally stable with 40% horizontal tail removed. The short period mode is significantly changed and to a lesser extent the Dutch roll mode is affected through lateral coupling. Longitudinal and lateral trimmability of the damaged aircraft are analysed by comparing the tail-loss-induced roll, pitch, and yaw moments to available actuator force from control surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Design, Manufacturing Processes, and Operations Management on the Assembly of Aircraft Composite Structure by Robert Mark Coleman
    The Effects of Design, Manufacturing Processes, and Operations Management on the Assembly of Aircraft Composite Structure by Robert Mark Coleman B.S. Civil Engineering Duke University, 1984 Submitted to the Sloan School of Management and the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Management and Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics in conjuction with the LEADERS FOR MANUFACTURING PROGRAM at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 1991 © 1991, MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Signature of Author_ .• May, 1991 Certified by Stephen C. Graves Professor of Management Science Certified by A/roJ , Paul A. Lagace Profes s Aeron icand Astronautics Accepted by Jeffrey A. Barks Associate Dean aster's and Bachelor's Programs I.. Jloan School of Management Accepted by - No U Professor Harold Y. Wachman Chairman, Department Graduate Committee Aero Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics MASSACHiUSEITS INSTITUTE OFN Fr1 1'9n.nry JUJN 12: 1991 1 UiBRARIES The Effects of Design, Manufacturing Processes, and Operations Management on the Assembly of Aircraft Composite Structure by Robert Mark Coleman Submitted to the Sloan School of Management and the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Management and Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics June 1991 ABSTRACT Composite materials have many characteristics well-suited for aerospace applications. Advanced graphite/epoxy composites are especially favored due to their high stiffness, strength-to-weight ratios, and resistance to fatigue and corrosion. Research emphasis to date has been on the design and fabrication of composite detail parts, with considerably less attention given to the cost and quality issues in their subsequent assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Fly-By-Wire - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 11-8-20 下午5:33 Fly-By-Wire from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Fly-by-wire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 11-8-20 下午5:33 Fly-by-wire From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Fly-by-wire (FBW) is a system that replaces the Fly-by-wire conventional manual flight controls of an aircraft with an electronic interface. The movements of flight controls are converted to electronic signals transmitted by wires (hence the fly-by-wire term), and flight control computers determine how to move the actuators at each control surface to provide the ordered response. The fly-by-wire system also allows automatic signals sent by the aircraft's computers to perform functions without the pilot's input, as in systems that automatically help stabilize the aircraft.[1] Contents Green colored flight control wiring of a test aircraft 1 Development 1.1 Basic operation 1.1.1 Command 1.1.2 Automatic Stability Systems 1.2 Safety and redundancy 1.3 Weight saving 1.4 History 2 Analog systems 3 Digital systems 3.1 Applications 3.2 Legislation 3.3 Redundancy 3.4 Airbus/Boeing 4 Engine digital control 5 Further developments 5.1 Fly-by-optics 5.2 Power-by-wire 5.3 Fly-by-wireless 5.4 Intelligent Flight Control System 6 See also 7 References 8 External links Development http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly-by-wire Page 1 of 9 Fly-by-wire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 11-8-20 下午5:33 Mechanical and hydro-mechanical flight control systems are relatively heavy and require careful routing of flight control cables through the aircraft by systems of pulleys, cranks, tension cables and hydraulic pipes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Service Publication of Lockheed Martin Aeronautical Systems Support Company
    LOCKHEED MAaTIN 4 VOL. 24, NO. 1 JULY-SEPTEMBER 1997 A SERVICE PUBLICATION OF LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS SUPPORT COMPANY - • Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page LOCKHEED MARTIN Service News It’s All in the Teamwork A SERVICE PUBLICATION OF t would be difficult to find an area of human endeavor that is more dependent upon team- LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICAL work for success than aviation. It is significant that mankind’s first conquest of the air was SYSTEMS SUPPORT COMPANY Inot achieved by an isolated visionary laboring in seclusion. Instead, the initial success came through the combined efforts of two gifted bicycle mechanics from Ohio, working with a team of Editor helpers and friends on a windswept beach in North Carolina. Charles I. Gale We at Lockheed Martin Aeronautical Systems Support Company (LMASSC) have never lost sight of the importance of just that kind Vol. 24, No. 1, July - September 1997 of teamwork in the way we operate our business. It is no coinci- dence that LMASSC is organized as a close partnership of two CONTENTS teams of specialists, both fully committed to meeting the total support needs of our customers. 2 Focal Point LMASSC’s Business Development and Each of the LMASSC organizations has its own special areas of Field Support units team up to provide expertise and responsibilities. Business Development, led by the best in total customer support. George Lowe, is the marketing arm for LMASSC and as such provides a remarkably broad range of customer support products. These include a com- 3 All About Power Plant Hoses prehensive spares provisioning program that offers new and overhauled spare parts and Both Teflon and elastomeric hoses are support/test equipment, rebuilt parts, an innovative parts exchange program, and complete used to connect power plant compo- component repair and overhaul.
    [Show full text]
  • AP3456 the Central Flying School (CFS) Manual of Flying: Volume 4 Aircraft Systems
    AP3456 – 4-1- Hydraulic Systems CHAPTER 1 - HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS Introduction 1. Hydraulic power has unique characteristics which influence its selection to power aircraft systems instead of electrics and pneumatics, the other available secondary power systems. The advantages of hydraulic power are that: a. It is capable of transmitting very high forces. b. It has rapid and precise response to input signals. c. It has good power to weight ratio. d. It is simple and reliable. e. It is not affected by electro-magnetic interference. Although it is less versatile than present generation electric/electronic systems, hydraulic power is the normal secondary power source used in aircraft for operation of those aircraft systems which require large power inputs and precise and rapid movement. These include flying controls, flaps, retractable undercarriages and wheel brakes. Principles 2. Basic Power Transmission. A simple practical application of hydraulic power is shown in Fig 1 which depicts a closed system typical of that used to operate light aircraft wheel brakes. When the force on the master cylinder piston is increased slightly by light operation of the brake pedals, the slave piston will extend until the brake shoe contacts the brake drum. This restriction will prevent further movement of the slave and the master cylinder. However, any increase in force on the master cylinder will increase pressure in the fluid, and it will therefore increase the braking force acting on the shoes. When braking is complete, removal of the load from the master cylinder will reduce hydraulic pressure, and the brake shoe will retract under spring tension.
    [Show full text]
  • 09 Stability and Control
    Aircraft Design Lecture 9: Stability and Control G. Dimitriadis Introduction to Aircraft Design Stability and Control H Aircraft stability deals with the ability to keep an aircraft in the air in the chosen flight attitude. H Aircraft control deals with the ability to change the flight direction and attitude of an aircraft. H Both these issues must be investigated during the preliminary design process. Introduction to Aircraft Design Design criteria? H Stability and control are not design criteria H In other words, civil aircraft are not designed specifically for stability and control H They are designed for performance. H Once a preliminary design that meets the performance criteria is created, then its stability is assessed and its control is designed. Introduction to Aircraft Design Flight Mechanics H Stability and control are collectively referred to as flight mechanics H The study of the mechanics and dynamics of flight is the means by which : – We can design an airplane to accomplish efficiently a specific task – We can make the task of the pilot easier by ensuring good handling qualities – We can avoid unwanted or unexpected phenomena that can be encountered in flight Introduction to Aircraft Design Aircraft description Flight Control Pilot System Airplane Response Task The pilot has direct control only of the Flight Control System. However, he can tailor his inputs to the FCS by observing the airplane’s response while always keeping an eye on the task at hand. Introduction to Aircraft Design Control Surfaces H Aircraft control
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Evaluation of Control Surfaces Aerodynamics for a Mid-Range Commercial Aircraft
    aerospace Article Computational Evaluation of Control Surfaces Aerodynamics for a Mid-Range Commercial Aircraft Nunzio Natale 1 , Teresa Salomone 1 , Giuliano De Stefano 1,* and Antonio Piccolo 2 1 Engineering Department, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Roma 29, 81031 Aversa, Italy; [email protected] (N.N.); [email protected] (T.S.) 2 Leonardo Aircraft Company, 80038 Pomigliano d’Arco, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-081-5010-265 Received: 4 August 2020; Accepted: 23 September 2020; Published: 25 September 2020 Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics is employed to predict the aerodynamic properties of the prototypical trailing-edge control surfaces for a small, regional transport, commercial aircraft. The virtual experiments are performed at operational flight conditions, by resolving the mean turbulent flow field around a realistic model of the whole aircraft. The Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes approach is used, where the governing equations are solved with a finite volume-based numerical method. The effectiveness of the flight control system, during a hypothetical conceptual pre-design phase, is studied by conducting simulations at different angles of deflection, and examining the variation of the aerodynamic loading coefficients. The proposed computational modeling approach is verified to have good practical potential, also compared with reference industrial data provided by the Leonardo Aircraft Company. Keywords: computational fluid dynamics; flight control surfaces; industrial aerodynamics 1. Introduction Present trends in commercial aircraft design methodologies, which are mainly oriented toward cost reduction for product development, demand the accurate prediction of the control surfaces aerodynamics, to examine the aircraft flight control system early in the design process.
    [Show full text]
  • Aussie Invader Airbrake Design by Paul Martin
    Aussie Invader Airbrake Design by Paul Martin When I design anything, my first step is to create a succinct reference. At the most elementary level, it is the answer to the question, “What is the goal?” So, in relation to the Aussie Invader airbrakes, I asked the question, “What do the airbrakes have to do?” The answer is of course, “To provide a means to decelerate the vehicle from 1000 mph rapidly in a controlled manner.” This retardation can best be achieved by creating a drag force that resists the direction of forward movement of the car. Aerodynamic drag is due firstly to the creation of a high-pressure region on the oncoming face of the airbrake. This is the side one Current Aussie Invader Airbrake - Engineered by Paul Martin, 3D Drawing would see if you stood next to the by Luis Boncristiano nose and looked rearward. Secondly, drag is enhanced by creating a low-pressure region on the trailing face of the airbrake. Thirdly, significant wave drag is accrued when the airbrakes are deployed supersonically. Good engineering may be best described as “the ability to optimise compromises”. The airbrakes on the Aussie Invader are a good example of this maxim. For example, for packaging reasons, the Invader’s airbrakes are limited to having a 650mm long chord with a 440mm wide span. The result is an aspect ratio (span to chord ratio) of 0.68 which is very low. [Aspect ratio is defined for a rectangular planform as the ratio of span to chord. It is a measure of how efficient or 2-Dimensional the flow is over the wing (or plate)].
    [Show full text]
  • Tailless Aircraft : an Overview
    o Journal of Aeronautics and Aerospace ISSN: 2168-9792 Engineering Editorial Tailless Aircraft : An Overview Srikanth Nuthanapati Department of Aeronautics, IIT Madras,Chennai,India. EDITORIAL Apart from its main wing, it lacks a tail assembly and any other Low or null pitching moment airfoils, as seen in the Horten horizontal surface. The main wing incorporates aerodynamic family of sailplanes and fighters, provide an alternative. These control and stabilisation functions in both pitch and roll. A have a unique wing segment with reflex or reverse camber on the tailless design might nevertheless feature a rudder and a vertical back or entire wing. The flatter side of the wing is on top, while fin (vertical stabiliser). Low parasitic drag, similar to the Horten the steeply curved side is on the bottom, resulting in a high angle H.IV soaring glider, and strong stealth qualities, similar to the of attack in the front part. Northrop B-2 Spirit bomber, are theoretical advantages of the Fitting large elevators to a standard airfoil and trimming them tailless configuration. The tailless delta has proven to be the considerably upwards can approximate reflex camber; the most successful tailless layout, particularly for combat aircraft, centre of gravity must also be moved forward from its normal albeit the Concorde airliner is the most well-known tailless position. Reflex camber tends to cause a tiny downthrust due to delta. the Bernoulli effect, thus the wing's angle of attack is increased A horizontal stabiliser surface separate from the main wing is to compensate. This, in turn, adds to the drag.
    [Show full text]
  • Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3B) Chapter 15
    Chapter 15 Transition to Jet-Powered Airplanes Introduction This chapter contains an overview of jet powered airplane operations. The information contained in this chapter is meant to be a useful preparation for, and a supplement to, formal and structured jet airplane qualification training. The intent of this chapter is to provide information on the major differences a pilot will encounter when transitioning to jet powered airplanes. In order to achieve this in a logical manner, the major differences between jet powered airplanes and piston powered airplanes have been approached by addressing two distinct areas: differences in technology, or how the airplane itself differs; and differences in pilot technique, or how the pilot addresses the technological differences through the application of different techniques. For airplane-specific information, a pilot should refer to the FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual for that airplane. 15-1 Jet Engine Basics Although the propeller-driven airplane is not nearly as efficient as the jet, particularly at the higher altitudes and cruising A jet engine is a gas turbine engine. A jet engine develops speeds required in modern aviation, one of the few advantages thrust by accelerating a relatively small mass of air to very the propeller-driven airplane has over the jet is that maximum high velocity, as opposed to a propeller, which develops thrust is available almost at the start of the takeoff roll. Initial thrust by accelerating a much larger mass of air to a much thrust output of the jet engine on takeoff is relatively lower slower velocity. and does not reach peak efficiency until the higher speeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Do You Really Understand How Your Trim Works? Many Do Not, and Why It Matters
    Do you really understand how your trim works? Many do not, and why it matters. Alex Fisher - GAPAN Picture yourself in a conventional airliner, say a 737 of any generation. You have to do a low level go-around, perhaps because your fail passive Cat lll has just failed, er, passively. You apply GA thrust, and the aircraft pitches up. If you are low enough, you may already have some extra helpful nose up trim applied thanks to the ‘design feature’ 1. Conventional Trimming that ensures that in the event of AP failure at low level, the aircraft pitches up not down, and so a few units of nose up trim are applied late in the approach. Your speed is low, a. Initial trimmed state about V app and the thing is pitching firmly upward. You need ample forward stick/elevator to restrain it. You don’t Trim wheel want to carry this load for long so you retrim. Question: if you run the trim forward while maintaining forward pressure on the wheel, what happens? Hands up all those who think the load reduces to zero. I see a lot of hands. My unscientific polling to date suggests that just about everyone is convinced that this is what happens, but it doesn’t. b. Forward column… Nearly everyone of my generation trained on a Cessna 150 or a Piper PA28. You fly those aircraft by putting the attitude where you want it, holding it there by holding the stick rigid and retrimming until the load goes to zero. In fact if you didn’t do that, but were too quick and started trimming before the aircraft was stable, the instructor would exhibit a severe sense of humour failure.
    [Show full text]
  • B0506 01-0925.Pdf
    International OPEN ACCESS Journal Of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) A Effect of Elevator Deflection on Lift Coefficient Increment S.Ravikanth1, KalyanDagamoori2, M.SaiDheeraj3,V.V.S.Nikhil Bharadwaj4, SumamaYaqub Ali 5 , HarikaMunagapati6 , Laskara Farooq 7 , Aishwarya Ramesh 8 , SowmyaMathukumalli9 1 Assistant Professor , Department Of Aeronautical Engineering, MLR Institute Of Technology, DundigalHyderabad. INDIA . 4,6,8,9Student , Department Of Aeronautical Engineering , MLR Institute Of Technology, Dundigal ,Hyderabad. INDIA . 2,3,5,7Student , Department Of Aeronautical Engineering , MLR Institute Of Technology and Management , Dundigal ,Hyderabad. INDIA . ABSTRACT:Elevators are flight control surfaces, usually at the rear of an aircraft, which control the aircraft's lateral attitude by changing the pitch balance, and so also the angle of attack and the lift of the wing. The elevators are usually hinged to a fixed or adjustable rear surface, making as a whole a tailplane or horizontal stabilizer. The effect on lift coefficient due to an elevator deflection is going to find by assuming the baseline value, initializing the aircraft at a steady state flight condition and then commanding a step elevator deflection. By monitoring the aircraft’s altitude and other related measurements, you can record the effect of a step elevator deflection at this flight condition. Repetitions of this experiment with various values will demonstrate how variations in this parameter affect the aircraft’s response to elevator deflection. Deflection of the control surface creates an increase or decrease in lift and moment. In this paper we are going to derive the different equations related to the longitudinal stability and control. The design of the horizontal stabilizer and elevator is going to do in CATIA V5 and the analysis is going to perform in ANSYS 12.0 FLUENT.
    [Show full text]