Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23(4):991±996, December 2003 q 2003 by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology RAPID COMMUNICATION MORPHOLOGICAL SUPPORT FOR A CLOSE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HIPPOS AND WHALES JONATHAN H. GEISLER1 and MARK D. UHEN2 1Department Geology/Geography and Georgia Southern Museum, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia 30460-8149,
[email protected]; 2Cranbrook Institute of Science, 39221 Woodward Avenue, P.O. Box 801, Bloom®eld Hills, Michigan 48303-0801,
[email protected] Recent discoveries of the ankles of fossil whales, reported tree for 1,000 iterations of the parsimony ratchet (Nixon, 1999), by Gingerich et al. (2001) and Thewissen et al. (2001b), cor- which was implemented with the command nix*1000. Bremer roborated the molecular hypothesis that Cetacea (whales, dol- support values were calculated using the programs PAUP 3.1.1 phins, and porpoises) are closely related to artiodactyls (even- (Swofford, 1993) and TreeRot (Sorenson, 1996), with modi®- hoofed mammals including hippopotami, pigs, deer, and cam- cations to the TreeRot commands ®le as described in Geisler els); however, major points of disagreement remain. A mor- (2001a). Lists of unequivocal synapomorphies for each node phology-based study incorporating some of these new data were compiled using the apo/ command in NONA 1.9. Where (Thewissen et al., 2001b) supported the exclusion of Cetacea we describe synapomorphies supported by our study, we cite from the clade of living artiodactyls. In contrast, a vast amount previous studies that have reached the same conclusion. of molecular data support placement of Cetacea within Artio- Institutional Abbreviations AMNH, American Museum dactyla, as close relatives to Hippopotamidae (Gatesy et al., of Natural History, Departments of Mammalogy and Vertebrate 1996, 1999; Montgelard et al., 1997; Shimamura et al., 1997, Paleontology (New York); GSM, Georgia Southern Museum, 1999; Nikaido et al., 2001).