DOCSLIB.ORG

MATATIELE ADOPTED 2020-21 IDP Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MATATIELE ADOPTED 2020-21 IDP Document P2G3O8.01 ,SD MATATIELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY ADOPTED 2020/21 INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (IDP) REVIEW. 102 MAIN STREET/ MATATIELE/ 4730. TEL: 039 737 8100. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Planning Framework ................................................................................................................................ 10 1.2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Public Participation Process ..................................................................................................................... 15 1.4 MEC Comments ........................................................................................................................................ 19 1.5 MEC Action Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 20 2.1 Regional Locality ...................................................................................................................................... 22 2.2 Municipal Locality .................................................................................................................................... 22 .............................................................................................................................................. 22 ................................................................................................................... 23 2.3 Demographic Profile ................................................................................................................................ 27 2.3.1 Population size and Distribution ........................................................................................................... 27 2.3.2 Population projections-2021 ................................................................................................................. 29 2.4. Social Profile ........................................................................................................................................... 30 2.4.1 Education Profile and Literacy Levels .................................................................................................... 30 2.4.2 Employment Profile ............................................................................................................................... 31 .......................................................................................................................... 33 .............................................................................................................................. 34 ................................................................................................................................. 35 2.4.6 Poverty Levels and Indicators ................................................................................................................ 36 2.4.7 Health Indicators ................................................................................................................................... 37 2.4.8 HIV/AIDS estimates ............................................................................................................................... 37 2.4.10 Access to information. ......................................................................................................................... 39 2.4.11 Community facilities ............................................................................................................................ 39 2.5 Ward Needs and Priorities ....................................................................................................................... 41 2.5.1 PART A: WARD NEEDS: .......................................................................................................................... 41 3.1 Development Strategy ............................................................................................................................. 66 3.1.1 Vision And Mission ................................................................................................................................ 67 3.1.2 5-Year Targets And Indicators ............................................................................................................... 68 3.2 2019/20 Developmental Priorities: Priorities, Objectives and Strategies .................................................. 71 4.1 Three-Year Capital Plan ......................................................................................................................... 115 4.2 PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES FOR 2020/2021 ..................................................................................... 122 5.1 Organisational Structure ........................................................................................................................ 132 5.2 Municipal Administration ...................................................................................................................... 132 5.2.1 Administrative structure ..................................................................................................................... 132 5.2.3 Municipal Powers and Functions ......................................................................................................... 134 5.2.4 Workplace Skills Plan .......................................................................................................................... 139 6.1 Customer Care Management ................................................................................................................. 145 6.2 Communication Strategy ........................................................................................................................ 145 6.2.1 Communication Channels .................................................................................................................... 146 6.3 Special Programmes Unit ....................................................................................................................... 146 6.4 Community Development Workers ........................................................................................................ 147 6.5 Inter-Governmental Relations ................................................................................................................ 147 6.6 Operation Masiphathisane (War-Rooms) ............................................................................................... 148 6.7 Stakeholders .......................................................................................................................................... 148 6.8 social cohesion ....................................................................................................................................... 148 6.9 Performance Management System ........................................................................................................ 148 6.10 Municipal Public Accounts Committee (MPAC) ..................................................................................... 149 2 6.11 Audit and Compliance .......................................................................................................................... 149 6.11.1 Internal audit .................................................................................................................................... 149 6.11.2 Audit Committee ............................................................................................................................... 150 6.11.3 Audit Plan ......................................................................................................................................... 151 6.11.4 Compliance Auditing ......................................................................................................................... 151 6.11.5 Performance Auditing ....................................................................................................................... 151 6.12 Risk Management and Fraud Prevention ............................................................................................. 151 6.12.1 Fraud Prevention Plan ....................................................................................................................... 151 6.12.2 Risk Management Plan ..................................................................................................................... 152 6.15 Information Technology and Communications ..................................................................................... 153 7.1 Economic Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 155 ........................................................................................................................ 155 .................................................................................................... 156 ................................................................................................................................... 157 ............................................................................................................... 157 .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Background Information Document Basic Assessment
    BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT as part of the BASIC ASSESSMENT PROCESS for the PROPOSED DR08017 ROAD AND PORTAL CULVERT UPGRADE, MATATIELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, ALFRED NZO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY 1. Introduction The Matatiele Local Municipality in conjunction with the Eastern Cape Department of Roads and Public Works has proposed the upgrade of the DR08017 Road from the R56 to Mvenyane Village. The project is located within Ward 21 of the Matatiele Local Municipality, Alfred Nzo District. Before construction of the pedestrian bridge may commence, an environmental authorisation is required from the Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism (EDEAT), in compliance with the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations of 2014. In order to obtain this authorisation a Basic Assessment is currently being undertaken by Enviroedge cc. 2. The Project The project is located in Ward 21. The start point, near Cedarville (0km) is from the intersection of the R56 and DR08017, and the end point (24km), is at Mvenyane Village. The proposed road upgrade involves the upgrading of the existing gravel road to a surfaced low-volume road, together with the upgrade of two watercourse crossings. The existing road is classified as a low volume road, however, this road has been identified as the most efficient link road between Mt Frere and Cedarville through to Matatiele. The road upgrade will offer the shortest route of surfaced road from Cedarville to Mt Frere (approximately 75km), compared to the current surfaced route via Kokstad (approximately 105km). The proposed road upgrade shall remain a single carriageway, two-way road. The DR08017 will be upgraded to Class 4 (6.8 metres wide), with a combination of sections including concrete pavement and bitumen.
    [Show full text]
  • Matatiele Road Rehabilitation Project Proposed
    MATATIELE ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECT PROPOSED REHABILITATION OF NATIONAL ROUTE R56 SECTION 8, BETWEEN MATATIELE AND THE KWAZULU-NATAL BORDER, WITHIN THE MATATIELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, IN THE ALFRED NZO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE Heritage Impact Assessment Report Issue Date: 6 June 2016 Revision No.: 3 PGS Heritage PO Box 32542 Totiusdal 0134, T +27 12 332 5305 F: +27 86 675 8077 Reg No 2003/008940/07 Declaration of Independence The report has been compiled by PGS Heritage (Pty) Ltd, an appointed Heritage Specialist for Gibb (Pty) Ltd. The views stipulated in this report are purely objective and no other interests are displayed during the decision making processes discussed in the Heritage Impact Assessment. HERITAGE CONSULTANT: PGS Heritage (Pty) Ltd CONTACT PERSON: Polke Birkholtz Tel: +27 (0) 12 332 5305 Email: [email protected] SIGNATURE: ______________________________ DETAILS OF CLIENT: CLIENT: Gibb (Pty) Ltd CONTACT PERSON: Robyn Phillips Tel: +27 (0)31 267 6175 Email: [email protected] HIA – MATATIELE ROAD REHABILITATION 6 JuNe 2016 Page ii of viii Report Title Heritage Impact Assessment for the proposed rehabilitation of National Route R56 Section 8 between Matatiele and the KwaZulu-Natal Border within the Matatiele Local MunicipalitY in the Alfred Nzo District MunicipalitY, Eastern Cape Province Control Name Signature Designation Author Polke BirkholtZ Heritage Specialist & Archaeologist at PGS Heritage Co-Author Jennifer Kitto Heritage Specialist at PGS Heritage Input bY Specialists: • Dr Maria van der RYst was commissioNed as StoNe Age specialist to provide inputs on the ideNtified StoNe Age sites aNd provide aN assessmeNt of these sites aNd outline whether aNy mitigatioN measures would be required.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Outstanding Trc Beneficiaries
    List of outstanding tRC benefiCiaRies JustiCe inVites tRC benefiCiaRies to CLaiM tHeiR finanCiaL RePaRations The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development invites individuals, who were declared eligible for reparation during the Truth and Reconciliation Commission(TRC), to claim their once-off payment of R30 000. These payments will be eff ected from the President Fund, which was established in accordance with the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act and regulations outlined by the President. According to the regulations the payment of the fi nal reparation is limited to persons who appeared before or made statements to the TRC and were declared eligible for reparations. It is important to note that as this process has been concluded, new applications will not be considered. In instance where the listed benefi ciary is deceased, the rightful next-of-kin are invited to apply for payment. In these cases, benefi ciaries should be aware that their relationship would need to be verifi ed to avoid unlawful payments. This call is part of government’s attempt to implement the approved TRC recommendations relating to the reparations of victims, which includes these once-off payments, medical benefi ts and other forms of social assistance, establishment of a task team to investigate the nearly 500 cases of missing persons and the prevention of future gross human rights violations and promotion of a fi rm human rights culture. In order to eff ectively implement these recommendations, the government established a dedicated TRC Unit in the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development which is intended to expedite the identifi cation and payment of suitable benefi ciaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Bid Document Rendering of Security Service Kwabhaca
    INVITATION FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS TO RENDERING OF SECURITY SERVICE KWABHACA FOR ALFRED NZO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY Enquiries: Mr S Mambafula: E-Mail [email protected] SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS DEADLINE Date: 03 March 2021 Time: 10h00 Venue: Alfred Nzo District Municipality Offices Erf 1400 Ntsizwa Street Mount Ayliff Name of Organisation Physical Address Contact Person Telephone No. Fax No. E-Mail Address Tender Price 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. 1. Tender Advert 3 2. Checklist 4 3. Form of Offer and Acceptance 5 4. MBD 1 - Invitation to Bid 7 5. MBD 2 - Tax Clearance Certificate 8 6. MBD 4 - Declaration of Interest 9 7. MBD 5 - Declaration Procurement above R10 Million 11 8. MBD 6.1 - Preference Points Claim Form 12 9. MBD 8 - Past Supply Chain Practices 17 10. MBD 9 - Certificate of Independent Bid Declaration 19 11. Proof of Municipal Good Standing 22 12. Authority for Signatory 23 13. BEE Certificate 25 14. Banking Details 26 15. Joint Venture Agreement 27 16. Subcontractors Schedule 28 17. Experience of Tenderer 29 18. Assessment of Bidder 31 19. Record of Addenda Issued 32 20. Eligibility Criteria 33 21. Functionality Test 34 22. Company Profile 35 23. Central Supplier Database 36 24. Compulsory Briefing Session 37 25. Scope of Works 38 26. Pricing Structure 39 27. General Conditions of Tender 40 28. General Conditions of Contract 44 2 ALFRED NZO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY ADVERT Alfred Nzo District Municipality (ANDM) is inviting all suitable Qualified and Experienced Professional Service Providers to submit bids for the following projects. The adjudication of the bids will be done in terms of Preferential Procurement Regulations, 2011 pertaining to Preferential Procurement Policy Framework (Act No5 of 2000) and will be based on the functionality and BBBEE points system.
    [Show full text]
  • 260307095952.Pdf
    C o n t e n t s Introduction ......................... 4 Environmental and Disaster Management . 31 Aims of the Summit..................... 4 Aims of this document .................. 5 Comprehensive Primary Health Care...... 32 District Snapshot...................... 6 Food Security and Safety-Nets .......... 34 Economic Growth and Infrastructure . 10 Crime Management and Prevention ...... 36 Economic Growth ..................... 10 Institutional Capacity Building .......... 37 Infrastructure Development ............. 16 Provincial Infrastructure Expenditure Plans . 21 Service Delivery Mechanisms............ 38 National Government .................. 24 Conclusions ......................... 40 Unlocking Access to Land .............. 25 Glossary ........................... 41 Skills Development ................... 26 Spatial Development Planning .......... 29 Introduction A I M S O F T H E S ummi T Building on the results of the National Growth and Development The aim of the GDS is to reach broad agreement on: Summit (NGDS) in June 2003, government proposed that all • A development path and programme for the district. District and Metropolitan Municipalities hold Growth and • What each social partner (government, business, labour and Development Summits (GDS) in their area of jurisdiction. community sector) should contribute to the implementation of the programme? The summits should provide opportunities for building • Strengthening of strategic thrust of the district to ensure partnerships with social partners by bringing together planning
    [Show full text]
  • Session 2.2 Vuyokazi Honono LED Strategy Review
    UMZIMVUBU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY LED STRATEGY REVIEW STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT SESSION Presentation on the ANDM LRED Strategy Presented by: Vuyokazi Honono 20 February 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Foreword 2. ANDM Vision for LED 3. Strategic Considerations 4. District LED High Impact Projects 5. Conclusion FOREWORD • ANDM LRED Strategy recognises that Alfred Nzo District is faced with high levels of unemployment and poverty which result in low affordability levels and further manifest in low levels of investment, development, service delivery and underutilization of development opportunities. • Identifies the communities of ANDM as the greatest asset beyond which to see an intensified radical local economic development • New private sector investments are needed to create jobs and improve livelihoods in the District. • Commercial and business development in the District is confined to the urban centres of Mount Ayliff, Mount Frere, Ntabankulu, Mbizana and Matatiele and to a smaller extent Cedarville FOREWORD • More substantial commercial and business activities are restricted to Kokstad which falls within Kwazulu-Natal province, which therefore means that a substantial portion of the District’s money is not even being reinvested into the Eastern Cape Province. • The District has limited and almost non-existent industrial economy and has a high dependency upon primary economic activities. • Youth unemployment is escalating, and poverty and inequality continue to characterize Alfred Nzo post democratic dispensation. • Therefore, it is envisaged that
    [Show full text]
  • Ntabankulu NU Goxe ALKERTON !
    !C !C^ ñ!.!C !C $ !C^ ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C $ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^!C ^ !C !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ ^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C ^$ !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C ñ !C !C !C !C ^ !C !.ñ !C ñ !C !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ñ ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ñ !C !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ñ !C !C ^ ^ !C !C !. !C !C ñ ^!C ^ !C !C !C ñ ^ !C !C ^ $ ^$!C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C !.^ ñ $ !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C $ !C ^ !C $ !C !C !C ñ $ !C !. !C !C !C !C !C ñ!C!. ^ ^ ^ !C $!. !C^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C !C !C !C ^ !.!C !C !C !C ñ !C !C ^ñ !C !C !C ñ !C !.^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !Cñ ^$ ^ !C ñ !C ñ!C!.^ !C !. !C !C ^ ^ ñ !. !C !C $^ ^ñ ^ !C ^ ñ ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ !C $ !. ñ!C !C !C ^ !C ñ!.^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C $!C ^!. !. !. !C ^ !C !C !. !C ^ !C !C ^ !C ñ!C !C !. !C $^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !.
    [Show full text]
  • Ntabankulu Local Municipality Socio Economic Review and Outlook, 2017
    NTABANKULU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY SOCIO ECONOMIC REVIEW AND OUTLOOK, 2017 Ntabankulu Local Municipality Socio-Economic Review and Outlook 2017 Published by ECSECC Postnet Vincent, P/Bag X9063, Suite No 302, Vincent 5247 www.ecsecc.org © 2017 Eastern Cape Socio Economic Consultative Council First published April 2017 Some rights reserved. Please acknowledge the author and publisher if utilising this publication or any material contained herein. Reproduction of material in this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission from ECSECC. Ntabankulu Local Municipality Socio-Economic Review and Outlook 2017 Foreword ECSECC was founded in July 1995 as an institutional mechanism for partnership between government, business, labour and the NGO sector to address underdevelopment and poverty in the Eastern Cape. The local government sector and the higher education sector joined ECSECC in 2003. ECSECC’s mandate of stakeholder co-ordination and multi-stakeholder policy making stems from the realization that Government cannot defeat poverty, unemployment and inequality on its own, but needs to build deliberate and active partnerships to achieve prioritized development outcomes. ECSECCs main partners are: the shareholder, the Office of the Premier; national, provincial and local government; organised business and industry; organised labour; higher education; and the organised NGO sectors that make up the board, SALGA and municipalities. One of ECSECCs goals is to be a socio-economic knowledge hub for the Eastern Cape Province. We seek to actively serve the Eastern Cape’s needs to socio-economic data and analysis. As part of this ECSECC regularly issues statistical and research based publications. Publications, reports and data can be found on ECSECCs website www.ecsecc.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Witchcraft in the Religion of the Hlubi of Qumbu: Focusing on the Issues of Sickness and Healing in the Society
    WITCHCRAFT IN THE RELIGION OF THE HLUBI OF QUMBU: FOCUSING ON THE ISSUES OF SICKNESS AND HEALING IN THE SOCIETY by MENSAH-ABORAMPAH OSEI submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF LITERATURE AND PHILOSOPHY in the subject RELIGIOUS STUDIES at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA PROMOTER: PROF G J A LUBBE JOINT PROMOTER: PROF L D JAFTA NOVEMBER 2003 DECLARATION Student Number: 793-201-4 “ I declare that WITCHCRAFT IN THE RELIGION OF THE HLUBI FOCUSSING ON THE ISSUES OF SICKNESS AND HEALING IN THESOCIETY’’ is my own work and the sourcesthat I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. SIGNATURE DATE M. OSEI ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Without the aid of a great many people, such an endeavour would have been impossible. Primary assistance and encouragement have come from Prof Babatunde Lawuyi and Dr H. Kukertz of Department of Anthropology, University of Transkei and my former colleagues, the late Prof Ephraim `Ntate’ Mosothoane, Dr David Field and Mr Mtozi Nogwina at the Department of Religious Studies, Unitra. My younger brother Dr. Winfred Assibey Bonsu of South African Goldfields, Johannesburg also deserves my appreciation for his encouragement and inspiration. My profound appreciation and debts of gratitude go to Professors Gerrie Lubbe and Liso Jafta, my promoters for their constructive criticism, invaluable suggestions, and stimulating and demanding guidance. Again, I am particularly grateful to Prof Lubbe for reminding me of `Sankofa’ (return and get it) in my Akan tradition when I abandoned my studies for four years after relocating to the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Nzo District Municipality
    2 PROFILE: ALFRED NZO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction: Brief Overview ............................................................................. 6 2.1 Location ..................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Historical Perspective ................................................................................................................ 7 2.3 Spatial Patterns ......................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Land ownership ......................................................................................................................... 8 3. Social Development Profile ............................................................................... 9 3.1 Key Demographics ..................................................................................................................... 9 3.1.1. Population ............................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.2 Gender, Age and Race ............................................................................................................ 9 3.1.3 Households ........................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Health Profile ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mr HJ Van Rensburg, Dr JJ Gregory and Prof. JA Gr
    VOL. 9 No. 2 APRIL 1970 Editorial Committee: A.J. du Plessis (chairman), Mr H.J. van Rensburg, Dr J.J. Gregory and Prof. J.A. Groenewald Editor: Mr. G.J. Wissing Technical editing: Mr Q. Momberg REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRIBUTIONS Articles in the field of agricultural economics, suitable for publication in the journal, will be welcomed. Articles should have a maximum length of 10 folio pages (including tables, graphs, etc.), typed in double spacing. Contributions, in the language preferred by the writer, should be submitted in triplicate to the Editor, do Department of Agricultural Economics and Marketing, Pretoria, and should reach him at least one month prior to date of publication." The Journal is obtainable from the distributors: "AGREKON", Private Bag 144, Pretoria. The price is 25 cents per copy or R1 per annum, post free. The dates of publication are January, April, July and October. "AGREKON" is also published in Afrikaans. Page I. EDITORIAL Farm Records - an aid to better management 1 11. ARTICLES 1. Subsistence and commercial farming 3 2. The marketing of livestock in the North-Eastern Cape 9 III. STATISTICS 14 IV, TRENDS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR 22 The marketing of livestock in the North-Eastern Cape* by P.J.D. DU TOIT, Senior Researcher, Department of Economics, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of the Orange Free State Agriculture constitutes the most important (d) the trade prefers fresh meat, particularly sector of the North-Eastern Cape regional econo- fresh offal; my. The transport system of this area is there- (e) the marketing channels for fresh meat in its fore largely aimed at accommodating the market- present form cannot handle the production of ing of agricultural products produced in this scattered abattoirs; region.
    [Show full text]
  • MOUNT FRERE 72 Mowa 61 2 !C Mdeni Mabhobho Mjila Cedarville Mjelweni Ñ !C Gushede SAPS AREA Nkanini Sikhumbeni Maamsi2 !
    !C !C^ ñ!.!C !C $ ^!C ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ ^ !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C $ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ ^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^$ !C !C ^ !C !C !C ñ !C !C !C ñ!C ^ ñ!C !. !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C ^ !C ñ !C !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ñ !C !C ^ ^ !C !C !C !. !C ñ ^!C ^ !C !C !C ñ ^ ^ !C !C $ ^$!C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C !.^ $ ñ !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C $ !C ^ !C $ !C !C !C $ ñ !. !C !C !C !C !C !C !. ^ ñ!C ^ ^ !C $!.^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !. !C !C !C ñ !C ^ñ !C !C ñ !C !C !. ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !Cñ ^$ ^ !C ñ !C !. ñ!C ^ !C !. !C !C ^ ^ ñ !. !C !C $^ ^ñ ^ !C ^ ñ ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ !C $ !. ñ!C !C !C ^ !C ñ!.^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C $!C ^!. !. !. !C !. ^ !C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ !C ñ!C !C !. !C $^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !.
    [Show full text]