DOCSLIB.ORG

Railway Companies, Railway Stations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Railway Companies, Railway Stations • CONVEYANCE. RAILWAY COMPANIES, THEIR OFFICES & OFFICIALS. Caledonian; offices, 31 Mosley st-Robert Williams, traffic agent for manager; C. W, Bayley, chief traffic manager; 0. J. Nichol.son, Manchester district passenger superintendent; G. Banks, assistant passenger superin- Cbeshire Lines Committee ; Central station, Windmill st. & Lower tendent & goods train superintendent; W. B. Worthington, chief M011ley st-William Kirk, station ma.ster ; goods department, engineer ; D. C. Rattray, assistant engineer; H . .A.. Hoy, chief Windmill st; grain department, Watson st ; mineral yard, Great mechanical engineer; John Hassall, chief cashier; J. Hoardman, Bridgewater st. Gaythorn ; .A.rthur J. Hewitt, goods agent, Central accountant ; William Hepworth, audit accountant ; Chri~topher station; Henry .A.lbert Green, locomotive superintendent, Trafford' Moor house, solicitor; H. Shelmerdine, estate agent & architect ; ' Park:, Stretford; head office, Central station, Liverpool, David J. Wharton, goods manager; S. Hauxwell, 1\Ssist:mt goods manager; Meldrnrn, manager John Sharp, police superintendent ; good~ superintendent at Salford (J.l&sgow & South Western, 39H York st-David Johnstone, rlist. agrnt; and Oldham road, and Cattle Station, .A.lbion st. Cross lane, Salford, and Adair st. Gt. Ancoats st-I. Mansfield, agent for the Midland Eli Winterbottom; Edward Prentis, storekeeper, Stores Department, Great Central; Head offices, London Road station Os borne st; J. Butler, town agent; officell, 4Mosley st; 41 Dickinson Sir Alexander Hfnderson, bart. M.P., chairman st. & 39 Corporation st Edw~>rd Chapman, Esq. :M.F., deputy chairman Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway Oo.-Thompson, M'Kay & Oo. Lim. &lrn Fay, general manager agents for Hull, Goole, West Hartlepool. &o. tmffic,104 Portland st J. Rostcrn, assistant to general manager London & North-Western (North Eastern division), Exchange station, 0. 8. Holt, secretary Victoria st-Henry Linaker, district superintendent ; F. T. Kinsman, D. H. Davies, solicitor (office, 12 Booth st. Piccadilly) out-door goods manager for Northern division ; J. Foden, chief F. Williams, accountant parcel agent. Town offices for the issue of tickets and receipt of C. A. Rowlandson, C. E., engineer parcels, 67 Market st. ; 15 Mosley st. ; 15 John Dalton st. and B. L. Mnrgatroyd, assistant en'lineer 181 Broad. st. P; parcel and enquiry offices, Smith field market. i. G. Robinson, chief mechanical engineer (office & works, Gorton) Cattle station, Liverpool rd. Cross lane, Salford. Goods yard, A. W. Longden. storekeeper Devonshire st. .A.; goods station Liverpool rd. and London rd C. T. Smith, goods manager London & North-Western (Lancashire Division); London Road Station, E. A. Clear, assistant goods manager W. J. Chipman, district goods superintendent: J. W. Fletcher, tele- R. Haig Brown, superintendent of the line gmph engineer ; J. Bell, district cashier ; J. Hunter, station S. H. Fourdrinier, assistant superintendent of the line master. City offices, 16 Mosley st. ; goods enquiry ofHce, Ducie st. Edw~>rd Watkin, mineral manager London rd. ; local enquiry office, Manchester Ship Canal Docks, S E. Barker, estate agent London & North-Western Railway Estate Office, Exchange Station- C. W. Neele, electrical engineer (office, Guide Bridge) George Biddle, agent James Taylor, cashier Manchester, South Junction & .A.ltrincham ; station (Oxford rd.) Oxford Geo. Taylor, canal district agent st-R. H. Brown, secretary& manager; E. B. Thornhill, Euston ata- J~ Heptonstall, stationery storekeeper " tion, London, and Charles A. Rowlandson, London Road. station A. Williamson, goods agent, Ducie street Manchester, engineers; Wm• .A.tkins, station master · Booking & Parcels Office, 4 Brown street-J. H. Rowcliffe. agent Midland ; passenger station (Central), Windmill street (G. C. Hawkins, Goods Claims Department, London road passenger agent-T N 4228); Goods offices & dep(Jt, Travis st. & . Great Eastern, 82 Portland st. & .A.rdwick (Great Central) (M. S. & L.) Adair st; Great .A.ncoats st-T Ns 887 & 5l72 (F. C. Pakeman,. Goods station-William Pownall, district goods superintendent goods agent), R L. Jervis, district goods manager; Branch estate· Great Northern Railway; head offices, Deansgate station, Peter st- office, Great .A.ncoats st. (W. B. A. Tempest, estate agent). Re­ Robert Henry Bryant, district goods manager; .T. J,. Cooke, district ceiving offices, 47 Piccadilly, 8 Albert place, Albert bridge, Smith­ locomotive mperintendent : general enquiry office, 1 Mosley st ; field market-T N 4114 & Central station; Goods & enquiry p&~senger & ticket offices, 221 Deansgate; enquiry office, Central office, Manchester Ship Canal Docks, Salford-T N 3079 (G. station; temporary warehouse Dale st Simmons, 89 Mosley street, district supt.-T N 5241) Great Western ; ofllces, 2 Brown· st-William Power, district goods North British; 21 Cannon st-Wm. Stocks, district tratfic agent manager; J. W. H. Sims, parcel agent ; goods offices, 11 .A.therton North-Eastern; office, 49 & 50 Arcade chambers, St. Mary's 11ate-G.C, st.ll9 Liverpool rd. & Grape st. Deansgate; City office, 6 George st. Huntley, district agent , Piccadilly -.Tames Farrant, agent N" orth Staffordshire; 36 & 37 Dickinson st-James Hill, agent Hull & Barnsley Railway & Dock: Co. 62 Market ~;t-Robert J. Williams, Shropshire Union Railway & Canal Uo. Castle st. Castlefield-F district agent Padmore, agent Lancashire & Yorkshire ; head office, Hunt's bank-B. C. Irwin, secre- tary ; D. Norman, assistant secretary ; J. .A.. F. .A.spinall, general RAILWAY STATIONS. PAS S EN G E R S. Central, Windmill street, near theTown Hall(Cheshire Lines Committee, Crumpsall (Lancashire & Yorkshire)-R. Kay, station master Gre11t Northern, GretJ.t Central (late Manchester, Sheffield & Lincoln­ Dean Lane, ~Newton heath (La.ncaslille & Yorkshire)- Henry shire) & Midland Railways) - W illiam Kirk, station master ; A. J. .A.inscough, station master [agent Hewett, goods agent; G. 0. Hawkins, Midland passenger agent Didsbury (Midland)-Edwa.rd Henry Bald win, station master & gooj~ El change, opposite Manchester cathedral (London & North-Western) Failsworth, Hardman lane, Old rd. (Lancashire & Yorkshire)­ -Henry Linaker, district superintendent; John Nicholson, station T. Evans, station master mMter Fairfield Street (Manchester, South Junction & .A.ltrincham)-Henry wndon Road (Great Western)- John W. H. Sims, station master Badger, station master wndon R08d (London & North-Western)-H. Linaker, district pas­ Fallowfield (Great Central) (M. B. & L.}-0. R. Mapleston, station Benger superintendent; J. Hunter, station master master wndon Road (Great Central)-R. Haig Brown, superintendent; J. W. Gorton,Oornwall st.(Great Central) (M. S. & L.)-Da.vid Ward Vemon, Hattee, station master station master Victoria, Hunt's bank (Lancashire & Yorkshire)-0. J. Nicholson, Hyde rd. (Great Central)--John Bayley, station master Jlll.S8enger superintendent; James Henry Sedgwick, station master Knott Mill, Deansgate (Manchester, South Junction & .A.ltrincham)­ Alexandra Park, Alexandra rd. south (Great Central)-John bmith, Edward H. Ward, station master ltation master Lcvenshulme (London & North Western; North Eastern section)­ Anl.wick, Blind lane, Higher .A.rdwick (Great Central) James Hyde, station master Aniwick, Blind lane, Higher .A.rdwick: (London & North-Western; Longsigbt, Kirkmanshulme la. (London & North Western; Northern Northern 81'ction)-Charles Gregory, clerk in charge section)--John Cooke, station master Ashbury'11, Pottery lane, Openshaw (Great Central) (M. 8. & L.)­ Miles Platting, Lamb la. (Lancashire & Yorkshire)--Samuel Peaker, Henry Marshall, station master station master Belle Vue, Hyde rood, Gorton (Great Central & Midland), Joshua Moston, M011ton la. Moston (Lancashire & Yorkshire)-Robert Glossop, Oxley, station master station master Chorlton·cum-Hardy, Wilbrd.b.am road-Hugh Hughes, station master Newton heath (L. & Y. Ry. Co.), Jo•eph Mottershead, station master Clayton Bridge, Berry brow, Newton heath (Lancashire & Yorkshire) Old Trafford, Seymour gro. (Mancllester, South Junction & .A.ltrincha.m) -John White., ~tation master --John Bleall6, station ma3ter Orictet Ground, Warwick rd. Stretford (open on match days only) Oxford Road, Whitworth street West, Oxford street, St. Peter's (Man­ (Manchester, South Juncton & Altrincham) no station master che:!ter, South Junction & Altrincham)-Richard Ha.ig Brown, definitely appointed manager; Willis. m Atkins station master MAN. 110* .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Freight Solution to the Castlefield Problem
    The Freight Solution to the Castlefield Problem Including The Business Case for a new route and western access to Trafford Park April 2020 (Revised August 2020) Contents Part 1. The Castlefield Problem – Freight’s Great Opportunity .................................................................................... 2 The Problem ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 A more fundamental question ................................................................................................................................... 5 Carrington Park .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 The search for a route to the south ........................................................................................................................... 7 Connecting to the West Coast Main Line .................................................................................................................. 9 Benefits of the proposed interventions ................................................................................................................... 14 Part 2. The Business Case for a Western Route to Trafford Park ................................................................................ 15 Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Salford CC Rail Strategy
    SALFORD RAIL STRATEGY (For SCC Council Consideration on 19 July 2017) LYNWOOD TRANSTEC LTD, CONSULTANTS TO THE RAILWAY & TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES, Lynwood House, 7 Lynwood Grove, STOCKPORT SK4 5DP SALFORD RAIL STRATEGY - STRUCTURE 1. THE PURPOSE OF THE RAIL STRATEGY 2. THE OBJECTIVES OF THE RAIL STRATEGY 3. THE CONTEXT OF THE RAIL STRATEGY The Local Context The Greater Manchester Spatial Framework The Regional Context The Rail North Long Term Rail Strategy (LTRS) Transport for the North ‘Northern Transport Strategy’ and the first Independent Economic Review for the North The Transport for the North’s ‘Strategic Transport Plan’ The Northern Hub Northern Railway and TransPennine Express committed changes Future franchises Transport for Greater Manchester Ten Year Rail Plan The Greater Manchester Transport Vision for 2040 4. RAIL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SHORT TO MEDIUM TERM ELECTRIFICATION Proposals for Future Electrification Currently Committed Schemes TRAIN SERVICE DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS TO SALFORD RAILWAY STATIONS Existing commitments Accessibility initiatives Interchange and Integration Regenerating communities through station development zones Station Retail Shops The Stations – • Salford Central • Salford Crescent • Walkden • Irlam • Eccles • Patricroft • Swinton (Moorside and Clifton) 5. RAIL IN THE COMMUNITY The National Context The Regional Context The Local Context - Station Adoption Community Rail Partnerships in practice The Journey Forward 6. RAIL FREIGHT IN GREATER MANCHESTER 7. RAIL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE LONGER TERM 8. LONGER TERM
    [Show full text]
  • JP Allocation 28 North of Irlam Station Topic Paper Pfe 2021
    JP Allocation 28 North of Irlam Station Topic Paper PfE 2021 Contents Section A – Background ..................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 4 Allocation JP 28 [North of Irlam Station] Overview ................................................ 6 Site Details ............................................................................................................ 7 Proposed Development ......................................................................................... 8 Site Selection ...................................................................................................... 11 Planning History .................................................................................................. 11 GMSF 2019 Consultation Responses ................................................................. 12 GMSF 2019 Integrated Assessment ................................................................... 13 GMSF 2020 Integrated Assessment ................................................................... 13 Section B – Physical ......................................................................................................... 22 Transport ............................................................................................................. 22 Flood Risk and Drainage ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Glazebrook Railway Trail Walk A3
    HB1 Dam Lane Junction HB2 Glazebrook West Junction As you look over the bridge parapet down the line towards You are standing on Dam Head Lane bridge No.182 looking west towards Liverpool, you are almost looking due west across Rixton and Liverpool. In the post war era this was one of the busiest goods lines in the Risley Moss with the cooling towers of Fiddlers Ferry visible in country, mainly transporting coal from the Yorkshire and Lancashire coal the distance. Birchwood Station is two miles Halt, Manchester and Liverpool. Prior to 1964 you would have been able to see all three junctions from this point that connected the main line to the Wigan Factory which had a railway of its own, although little remains of this today. controlled this busy junction – Dam Lane, Glazebrook Moss and Glazebrook Turning around and looking over the bridge behind you to the West. east you can see the outline of where the branch line swept Today from this vantage point the curve of the disused railway to Culcheth north east. The small quaint row of station cottages follow the and Wigan is clearly visible. The triangular field in between was bounded by start of the Wigan Junction line heading off North East on a the three junctions which collectively made up Glazebrook West Junction. tight 37 chain (745m) curve to Moss junction. Looking eastward over the other side of the bridge the wooded area you see today was once part of the expanse of Glazebrook West Junction. HB3 Wigan Junction Railway You are now looking at the disused Wigan Junction Railway which joined the main line behind.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.20 Down Manchester,” L.N.E.R
    No. 9 The “3.20 Down Manchester,” L.N.E.R. First published in the Meccano Magazine September 1927 It was something of a shock to the well-established London and North Western and Great Northern Railways when the Midland signified its intention of extending its ramified system southward to its own terminus in London and, as an earnest of the intention, ran a line through Bedford to Hitchin and monopolised a large share of the Great Northern main line into King’s Cross until its own St. Pancras Station was ready in 1868. Still more of a surprise, perhaps, was given to all these three companies when, nearly at the close of last century, in the face of determined opposition, the Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway obtained Parliamentary powers to do exactly the same thing. Prior to the opening of the “London Extension” in 1899, the Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire was an important system crossing the country from Cleethorpes and Grimsby in the east, through Sheffield and Barnsley to Manchester in the west, with a share in the large joint railway known as the Cheshire Lines Committee, and important interests in North Wales, its southernmost tentacle extended to Annesley, near Nottingham. The powers obtained enabled the M.S. and L. Company to prolong this line southward through Nottingham, Leicester and Rugby to a 1 junction with the London Metropolitan Railway, which had advanced northward to a point beyond Aylesbury. As a result of this vastly important development the provincial railway required a new name, and included in the Parliamentary powers was the authority to change its name from Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire to the imposing title of “Great Central” Railway.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool's Lost Railway Heritage
    Liverpool’s Lost Railway Heritage Angela Connelly and Michael Hebbert MARC Discussion Paper March 2011 Manchester Architecture Research Centre, University of Manchester http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/research/marc/ ISBN: 978-1-907120-99-2 2 Angela Connelly is a Research Assistant and Associate of MARC [email protected] Michael Hebbert is Professor of Town Planning, University of Manchester [email protected] © Manchester Architecture Research Centre (MARC) 3 Background This discussion paper is the result of a short research project undertaken by MARC in February 2011. Liverpool’s lost railway heritage had come up in one of our regular trawls amongst local governments and agencies in North West England for live topics suitable for project work or disser- tations. John Hinchliffe, World Heritage Officer of Liverpool City Council, spoke of neglected pre- 1850 railway heritage, some of it still unlisted, including tunnels that lead up from the north and south docks to Edge Hill on the escarpment behind the city centre. He asked if we could provide a description and assessment of this extraordinary heritage, and a summary of the views of the prin- cipal stakeholders. The topic was fascinating but beyond the scope of a student project or dissertation. Happily, an experienced MARC researcher had a month on her hands between submitting her PhD thesis and undergoing her oral examination. Angela Connelly’s PhD, funded by the Arts and Humanities Re- search Council in collaboration with the Methodist Church, is a study of the design and use of Meth- odist Central Halls, involving archival work, interviews, and architectural documentation in six cities - including Liverpool.
    [Show full text]
  • Vale Royal Borough Council
    Vale Royal Borough Council the baggin man Takes the Train the baggin man Contents Takes the Train Pages 2 Introduction 3 Enjoy Vale Royal 5 Visit Chester and Cheshire 7 Train at Plumley Station 9 Forty Years On 11 The Whitegate Way 13 A Close Shave 15 And the Band played on 17 A Special Excursion 19 A Village Society 21 Underneath the Arches 23 History in the making 25 A Great Institute 27 A Partnership in action 29 The Best Kept Story 31 The Baggin Man 32 Acknowledgements the baggin man Takes the Train Watercolours courtesy of Bernice Barrett-Brown 1 the baggin man Introduction Takes the Train From John Hulme Welcome to The Salt Museum, Northwich and Underneath the Arches – an exhibition celebrating Mid Cheshire Railways. It is now five years since I wrote the first Baggin column, for the local Chronicle Series, telling the stories of Mid Cheshire as Bilbo Baggins cruised the local waterways. Over 100 columns and two books later, there are now more than 40,000 copies in circulation all over the world. It is amazing this railway exhibition came about because we moored the Bilbo Baggins on the River Weaver in Northwich and decided to walk up to the Salt Museum. On that fine sunny morning, I had a chance meeting with Andrea Peattie, Vale Royal’s Tourism Manager and Matt Wheeler, the Museum’s Curator, to discuss the Cheshire Best Kept Station Competition. As we discussed the history of the local railways and a few yards away a train thundered over the Northwich Viaduct, Matt said “Let’s have an Exhibition of Mid Cheshire Railways”.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronological List of the Railways of Lancashire, 1828-1939
    CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF THE RAILWAYS OF LANCASHIRE, 1828-1939 BY M. D. GREVILLE In addition to previously published data, I have consulted official and Rail­ way Clearing House records, local and railway press, and Bradshaw's Manual. There is often a bewildering discrepancy in dates in railway records, especially the older ones. Every effort has been made to establish the correct dates, and when this has not been possible from contemporary references, I have shown the ones which, taking all circumstances into consideration, seem the most likely to be accurate. Closing of lines and withdrawal of passenger services are noted only up to the outbreak of war in September 1939. The closing dates given are those for the last days on which trains ran. The railways have been grouped under the following headings and subheadings: 1 LONDON, MIDLAND & SCOTTISH RAILWAY A London & North Western Railway and Components B Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway and Components C Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway and London & North Western Railway Joint Lines D Midland Railway and Components E Furness Railway and Components F Furness and Midland Joint Line G Knott End Railway 2 LONDON & NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY GREAT CENTRAL RAILWAY AND COMPONENTS 3 VARIOUS AND INTER-GROUP JOINT LINES A London & North Western Railway and Manchester, Sheffield & Lincolnshire Railway Joint Lines B Cheshire Lines Committee C Sheffield & Midland Joint Lines D Mersey Railway E Liverpool Overhead Railway 1. LONDON, MIDLAND & SCOTTISH RAILWAY A. LONDON & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY [Formed 16.7.1846 by amalgamation of Grand Junction, Man­ chester & Birmingham and London & Birmingham Railways. Amalgamated with the Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway, 1.1.1922.
    [Show full text]
  • EIR Request Wapping Tunnel Feasibility Study
    EIR Request Wapping Tunnel Feasibility Study Reference RSN16726 Request Stage Request Date Received 07/12/2017 Date Responded 22/12/2017 Disclosure Full Exemptions / Exceptions N/A Supporting Documents City Line to Northern Line Connection Feasibility Study The information supplied continues to be protected by copyright. You are free to use it for your own purposes, including for private study and non-commercial research and for any other purpose authorised by an exception in current copyright law. Documents (except photographs) can also be used in the UK without requiring permission for the purposes of news reporting. Any other reuse, for example, commercial publication would require the permission of the copyright holder. G:\FOI\Request Disclosure Logs\2017-18\12 December 2017 Responses Request I would like to make a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It concerns the initial feasibility report carried out to review the potential of bringing the Wapping Tunnel back into use for passenger services. I would like to see this report. Response Thank you for your recent request, which has been processed in accordance with the Environmental Information Regulations 2004. Please find attached a copy of the City Line to Northern Line Connection Feasibility Study completed by Mott MacDonald. Please note the copyright disclaimer at the foot of this email regarding the allowed reuse of this information. I trust that this information is of interest to you. If you are dissatisfied with the handling of your request, you have the right
    [Show full text]
  • Enc. 2 for Updated Long Term Rail Strategy , Item 49. PDF 368 KB
    Appendix 2: Summary of LTRS Packages Summary of contents detailed in packages contained within the Long Term Rail Strategy Package 1: Improving National Passenger and Freight Connections (CP5 – CP7) Components Increasing inter-peak frequency of Liverpool - London services and extending the Crewe - London interurban services to operate to Liverpool; Extending platforms 3 and 4 at Liverpool South Parkway to allow longer trains to call; Resolving conflict between passenger and freight services including grade separated junctions between the Bootle Branch, West Coast Mainline and Chat Moss route; and New direct routes between Liverpool and Glasgow Central / Edinburgh Waverley, Stoke / Derby / Leicester, and Bristol / Cardiff. Package 2: Merseyrail Growth Enabling (CP5-CP8) Components Replacing Merseyrail Rolling Stock with higher capacity, high quality heavy rail units with provision for dual voltage units; Future proofing the power requirements of the Merseyrail network by undertaking a full power upgrade; Reducing operational constraints at Liverpool Central by introducing a turnback facility at Liverpool South Parkway; Increasing rail capacity across the network; Increasing Merseyrail depot capacity with a new facility at Birkenhead Central; and Introducing operational efficiencies. Package 3: Liverpool City Centre Capacity (CP6 – CP8) Components Optimising passenger use at James Street and Moorfields stations; Full implementation of the Liverpool Central Station passenger capacity enhancements scheme; Improving rail capacity
    [Show full text]
  • Railway and Canal Historical Society North West Group Visit to Irlam And
    Railway and Canal Historical Society North West Group Visit to Irlam and Cadishead 23 February 2017 The visit will enable the group to explore the transport and industrial history of Irlam and Cadishead. The development of transport from the 18 th. Century Mersey and Irwell Navigation, the turnpike, the building of railways and the Manchester Ship Canal in the 19th Century, the gradual disappearance of industry during the late 20th Century and the gradual replacement of the lost jobs by the light industry which we see today. The attached OS map from 1928 shows the area at the peak of the development of heavy industry. The old Lancashire – Cheshire county boundary along the course of the river Mersey and the navigation is marked and was only changed to follow the line of Ship Canal in the mid-1920s. Considerable areas of Lancashire were covered by mosses or bogs. The principle areas of moss were situated in the Fylde, to the east of what is now Southport and to the west of Manchester. Chat Moss was one of these, lying between Manchester and Warrington. Irlam and Cadishead lie to the south of Chat Moss and to the north of the river Mersey. There were other mosses in north Cheshire and all these mosses made travel around the area between Manchester and Warrington difficult. The mosses were later drained and turned into the rich agricultural land we see today. However there are still few road crossings of the Mersey – Irwell valley in a north - south direction. Irlam was known in the 13th Century as Irwelham, that name being derived from the name of the river Irwell.
    [Show full text]
  • Hsuk North-West Rail Strategy
    HSUK NORTH-WEST RAIL STRATEGY For many years, a high speed railway linking London, Heathrow, Birmingham and Manchester has been seen by planners as the core element of a UK high speed rail network. There has also been general acceptance that such a ‘North-West Corridor’ route will ultimately continue along the axis of the present West Coast Main Line to Edinburgh and Glasgow, and there seems an unarguable logic in a new direct route linking the UK’s capital and primary aviation hub with its second and third most populous cities, and ultimately extending to Scotland. However, this clearly desirable concept is fatally flawed by a) the impracticality of establishing high speed routes through the centres of Heathrow, Birmingham and Manchester, and b) its failure to recognise the wider requirement for high speed rail to comprise a genuine network, capable of linking all of the UK’s major centres. Against this latter requirement, a high speed route aligned primarily with the West Coast Main Line, and lacking any trans- Pennine dimension, clearly fails to measure up. To gain maximum connectivity benefits for the North-West from the UK high speed rail initiative, and to avoid the clear dangers of increasing regional economic disparities through increased focus upon London, a trans-Pennine high speed route must be integral to any proposal put forward by the Government. This has been belatedly recognised in the 2014 launch of the Government’s ‘HS3’ initiative. The following diagrams chart the development of the North-West’s rail network, and illustrate the likely impacts of both HS2 and High Speed UK.
    [Show full text]