Columbia Ground Forest Openings in Squirrel in Subalpine Central Idaho

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Columbia Ground Forest Openings in Squirrel in Subalpine Central Idaho Columbia Ground Squirrel in Subalpine Forest Openings in Central Idaho Item Type text; Article Authors Lambeth, R.; Hironaka, M. Citation Lambeth, R., & Hironaka, M. (1982). Columbia ground squirrel in subalpine forest openings in central Idaho. Journal of Range Management, 35(4), 493-497. DOI 10.2307/3898613 Publisher Society for Range Management Journal Journal of Range Management Rights Copyright © Society for Range Management. Download date 02/10/2021 06:26:48 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/645976 Columbia Ground Squirrel in Subalpine Forest Openings in Central Idaho RON LAMBETH AND M. HIRONAKA Abstract Columbia ground squirrels were studied in natural alpine forest Annual precipitation, mostly in the form of snow, ranges from openings. Three sites were selected having the same potential but 635 mm to more than 1400 mm (25 to 55 in.). Sporadic, high presently with different vegetation due to differing levels of past intensity, short duration summer thunderstorms are moderately domestic sheep use. Ground squirrel population was least in the frequent. The growing season is less than 60 days at 1800 m (6000 light-use area and increased with vegetation change induced by ft), while frost may occur any night during the summer. increased sheep use. Juveniles were most plentiful in the medium- The short growing season, the coarse plant material and youth- use site and least in the heavy-use area. Up to a point, ground fulness of the geomorphology have restricted soil development. squirrel population increased with plant retrogression. With con- Entisols and Inceptisols dominate. tinued retrogression the community became less suitable to sup The extreme climatic and elevational gradients are responsible port a healthy population because of less preferred forage species. for the numerous vegetational zones in the Idaho batholith. At the Lupinus sericeus was the most preferred forb. Other species lower elevations, true Palouse bunchgrass occurs. With increasing included Achilles millefolium and Descurania richardsonii, spe- elevation, the vegetational series encountered are ponderosa pine, cies not generally preferred by sheep. The discussion of sheep- Douglas-fir, grand fir, Engelmann spruce-fir, and the subalpine ground squirrel relative impacts also considers metabolic fir-whitebark pine (Daubenmire 1970, Evans and Tisdale 1972, requirement, grazing. period and animal density of both grazers. Steele et al. 1975). Eighty percent of the batholith is coniferous forest. The subalpine fir-whitebark pine zone is relatively small in Natural forest openings in the subalpine zone provide the bulk of total area yet is of primary importance for sheep summer range. the forage on domestic sheep summer range in central Idaho. In Applicability of research findings to other areas of the batholith these openings Columbia ground squirrels (Citehs cohmbianus) was a prime consideration in selection of study area. are readily observed as they forage and sit up near burrow entran- ces, quietly observing their surroundings and darting into the Methods safety of the burrow when alarmed by unfamiliar sound or move- ment. The foraging activity is confined to daylight hours during the The study was conducted in forest openings associated with the growing season. Depending on locality, these animals hibernate subalpine fir-whitebark pine series at about the 2275 m (7500 ft) for 7 or 8 months (Shaw 1926). The adult ground squirrel weighs MSL. Three openings were selected on the basis of known sheep about a pound (450 g), with males outweighing females. grazing histories, i.e., lightly used, heavily used bedding ground Observations suggest that the Columbia ground squirrel com- and a moderately utilized opening. The historic use was not mea- petes for the same forage utilized by domestic sheep on the summer sured, but was determined through communication with U.S. range. Other studies have indicated that ground squirrel popula- Forest Service personnel. In the year of study there was no grazing tions increase with livestock grazing primarily because changes in by sheep. The medium and heavy-use areas generally had been composition and structure of the vegetation provide greater visibil- grazed every year and the light-use area one year in two. All three ity for the small animal (Smith 1940, Howard and Childs 1959). sites were in the same grazing allotment. All sites were southerly Because of the importance of the subalpine forest openings for exposed with slopes ranging from 12 to 38% and with similar domestic sheep grazing and the association of these openings to the granitic parent material. The original vegetation was thus judged Columbia ground squirrel, it is important that the interrelation- to be essentially the same for the three sites. ships are better understood. The purpose of this study was to At each site, two contiguous 50 X 50 m (165 X 165 ft) plots were determine the diet of the Columbia ground squirrel, its effect(s) on delineated. One of the two plots was randomly selected for inten- sive vegetation sampling. The other was used for live trapping of plant communities and population response in relation to domestic sheep grazing. ground squirrels. Vegetation Sampling Area of Study Vegetation was sampled for foliage cover by species as deter- mined by a vertical IO-point frame (Goodall 1952) with 50 random The study was conducted in the Idaho batholith portion of the placements at each of the three sites. Sampling was done in July at Payette National Forest in central Idaho. This batholith is the the peak flowering of the most species. Yield was determined by largest granitic intrusion in the United States and occupies nearly individual species in ten .lOm* (.96 ft2) randomly located plots. 16,000 square miles. The terrain is extremely rugged, with uplifting Yield is reported as oven-dried (7OOC). and faulting and mountain glaciation determining the land con- Ground Squirrel Sampling tour. Long, steep-flanked ridges with occasional peaks character- Columbia ground squirrel population data were gathered from ize this mountainous area. Elevational extremes range from 550 m 10 X 10 X 40 cm (4 X 4 X 16 in.) live traps placed in a grid pattern of (1800 ft) MSL to peaks of 2725 m (9000 ft) MSL (Thompson 1973). 3 across the plot by 4 down, making 12 traps per plot. Traps were R. Lambeth is presently with the Bureau of Land Management, Grand Junction, operated for a 24-hour period before removal to another site. The Colorado. same site was resampled every third day. The traps were checked This paper is published with the approval of the Director, Forest, Wildlife, and Range Experiment Station, University of Idaho, Moscow 83843, as Contribution No. twice daily, noon and sunset. All capture points were mapped. 236. This study was supported in part from M&tire-Stennis funds. Manuscript received November 17. 1980. JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT 35(4), July 1982 493 Captured squirrels were removed to a handling cone, sexed, Lightly Used Medially Used Heavily Used weighed, marked with black hair dye on adults and 5% picric acid solution on juveniles(young of the year), and then released. Recap- tured animals were weighed and, if needed, the markings were refreshed before release. Fecal pellets in traps were collected and -: 36 species 39 species ::. 34 Sp.Cle‘ salted for preservation. Fecal samples of adults were composited H - 3.95 Ii = 319 b’.’ Ii = 2.35 358 k!j/ho 389 kg/ha .:.:: 369 kg/ho daily by site; those of juveniles constituted a separate sample. At ., the end of the population sampling, ten individuals were sacrificed for stomach and colon content comparison. This was to test the reliability of the microscopic fecal analysis that was to be made later. The trapping period was from July 17 to August 21 and again on September 7. Reference plant material for microscopic fecal analysis was collected. Dietary Analysis :,:: The microscopic technique of diet analysis is well known 7 (Brusven and Mulkern 1960, Storr 1961, Sanders et al. 1980). Microscopic slides were prepared from identified reference plants I:‘: in the manner described by Cavender and Hansen (1970). <I -10 2498 <I Cl 4-10 24-46 The Wiley mill was used to grind fecal and stomach samples to l-3 ‘I l-23 ;49-97 l-3 I l-23 4997 l-3 II-23 49-97 be analyzed. Reference plant materials were also ground in the Cover 1%) class Intervals Cover P/J class mtervols Cover (%I close intervals Wiley mill to make them of uniform particle size with that in the fecal and stomach samples. From this material 8 mgaliquants were Fig. 1. Number of species present in different cover classes (increasing by Log:), total yield and Shannon- Weaver Diversity Index (IY) of 3 subal- taken for quantitative reference slides. For each of these reference pine forest opening communities with dlyferent past levels of domestic plant species there was a known weight of material spread over a sheep use. The number of grass and grasslike species are given in the standard area the size of the cover of glass. Quantitative reference stippled area of the columns; the number forbs are presented in the slides were made separately for the floral and leaf parts of most unstippled area. species. The type of epidermal tissue fragment selected as diagnostic for lightly grazed and the heavily grazed sites, placing them at each species appeared on the respective quantitative reference extremes to each other. Following the descending diversity indices slides in the frequency range of 45-75 percent of the observed for the plant communities, the three sites move down the succes- microscope tields. Frequencies were converted to density values sional gradient from the lightly grazed to the medially grazed to the expected under random conditions according to Fracker and Bri- heavily grazed field.
Recommended publications
  • Seed Collection Policy and Pricing
    NATIVE PLANT SEED COLLECTION PRICING TABLE Note: Prices listed in Vendor prices for Fall/Winter 2012-2013 based on 10% of retail Price Per Pound BLM paid in the recent National seed buys * Common Name TSIS Scientific Name Ecoregion/ Location Fall/Winter ($) * BLM Charge rate ($) SHRUBS Buy 2/Ave Buy 3/Ave Big sagebrush, basin Artemisia tridentata tridentata $ 1.05 $ 2.12 0.159 Big sagebrush, mountain Artemisia tridentata vaseyana $ 1.45 $ 2.95 0.220 Big sagebrush, Wyoming Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis $ 1.06 $ 2.55 0.181 Bitterbrush, antelope Purshia tridentata $ 1.65 $ 1.48 0.157 Bitterbrush, desert Purshia glandulosa $ 1.95 $ 1.70 0.183 Blackbrush Coleogyne ramossisima $ 2.50 0.250 Brittlebush, Virgin River Encelia virginensis $ 0.90 0.090 Bursage, white Ambrosia dumosa $ 2.90 0.290 Cheesebush Hymenoclea salsola $ 2.50 0.250 Cliffrose Cowania stansburiana $ 2.50 0.250 Creosote bush Larrea tridentata $ 3.00 0.300 Ephedra, green Ephedra viridus $ 2.00 0.200 Ephedra, Nevada Ephedra nevadensis $ 2.00 0.200 Mountain mahogany, birchleaf Cercocarpus betulifolia $ 3.00 0.300 Mountain mahogany, curlleaf Cercocarpus ledifolius $ 2.80 $ 2.50 0.265 Mountain mahogany, true Cercocarpus montanus $ 3.00 $ 3.00 0.300 Quailbush Atiplex lentiformis $ 1.25 0.125 Rabbitbrush, rubber Ericameria nauseosa $ 1.15 $ 0.95 0.105 Rabbitbrush, whitestem Ericameria nauseosa ssp. hololeuca $ 1.10 0.110 Sagebrush, black Artemisia nova $ 1.75 $ 1.95 0.185 Sagebrush, low Artemisia arbuscula $ 1.80 $ 1.75 0.178 Saltbush, cattle Atriplex polycarpa $ 1.00 0.100 Saltbush, fourwing Atriplex canescens $ 0.69 $ 0.60 0.065 Shadescale Atriplex confertifolia $ 0.45 $ 0.50 0.048 Winterfat Kraschenninikovia lanata $ 1.20 $ 1.00 0.110 Spiny hopsage Grayia spinosa $ 3.50 0.350 Attachment 4-1 Common Name TSIS Scientific Name Ecoregion/ Location Fall/Winter ($) * BLM Charge rate ($) FORBS Aster/Fleabane Aster or Erigeron sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Lupinus Sericeus (Silky Lupine) (Pdf)
    Lupinus sericeus Silky Lupine by Kathy Lloyd Montana Native Plant Society here are two Lewis and Clark specimens of silky lupine (Lupinus sericeus) still extant T today. One is housed at the Lewis & Clark Herbarium at the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, and the other at the Herbarium of the Royal Botanic Gardens in Kew, Surrey, England. It is amazing to consider the 200 year journey of the plants collected by Lewis and Clark, the miles they traveled, the numerous hands they passed through, where they ended up, and our modern day attempts to sort it all out. It now appears that the silky lupine specimen at the Lewis & Clark Herbarium was collected in Idaho on June 5, 1806. The original annotation on the specimen, made by the botanist Frederick Pursh says, “New Species Flowers cream coloured with a Small tinge of blue. On the Kooskooskee Jun: 5th 1806.” The Kooskooskee is the name given by the expedition to the present-day Photo: Drake Barton Clearwater River. In early June 1806 the entire expedition was at Camp Chopunnish near Kamiah, Lupinus sericeus (Silky Lupine) Idaho waiting for enough snow to melt to travel the Lolo Trail into Montana. Lewis’s journal for June 5 & Clark Pass. Pursh’s label, still with the specimen, mentions observing “several of the pea blume reads, “Lupinus Sericeus.* Cokahlaishkit. Jul. 7, flowering plants” and one of them could have been 1806? Flowers yellowish white.” silky lupine. Silky lupine is a handsome member of the pea The specimen that is now at Kew in England has a family (Fabaceae).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Plants from Kamiak Butte
    Plants for Prairie Remnant UI Project (2010) Conifers 1. Pinus ponderosa ponderosa pine 2. Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir Shrubs/subshrubs 3. Amelanchier alnifolia (white early) serviceberry 4. Arctostaphylos uva-ursi bearberry, kinnikinnik 5. Berberis repens (yellow, early) creeping Oregon grape 6. Crataegus douglasii (cream, mid) black hawthorn 7. Holodiscus discolor (cream, mid) ocean spray 8. Paxistima myrsinites mountain box 9. Philadelphus lewisii (white, early-mid) mock-orange 10. Physocarpus malvaceus (cream, mid) ninebark** 11. Prunus virginiana (white, mid-early) common chokecherry 12. Rosa nutkana (large pink, mid-early) Nootka rose 13. Rosa woodsii (pink, mid-early) woods’ rose 14. Spiraea betulifolia (cream, mid) spiraea 15. Symphoricarpos albus snowberry Forbs/Herbs 16. Achillea millefolium (cream, mid) yarrow 17. Arnica cordifolia (yellow, mid-early) heart-leaf arnica 18. Aster spp. (purple, late) aster 19. Balsamorhiza sagittata (yellow, early) arrowleaf balsamroot 20. Calochortus elegans (cream, early-mid) elegant cat’s-ear 21. Castilleja miniata (red, mid) scarlet paintbrush 22. Clematis hirsutissima (blue, early) sugarbowls 23. Frageria virginiana wild strawberry 24. Fritillaria pudica (yellow, early) yellow bell 25. Gaillardia aristata (orange, yellow, mid) blanket-flower 26. Geranium viscosissimum (pink, mid-early) sticky geranium 27. Geum triflorum (feathery, late) prairie smoke 28. Lithospermum ruderale(pale yellow, early) Columbia puccoon 29. Lomatium triternatum (yellow, early) nine-leaved biscuitroot 30. Lupinus polyphyllus (blue, mid) many-leaved lupine 31. Lupinus sericeus (blue, mid-early) silky lupine 32. Penstemon attenuatus (blue, mid) taper-leaved penstemon 33. Penstemon venustus (purple, mid-early) Blue Mtn. penstemon 34. Phlox speciosa (pink, early) showy phlox Grasses 35. Festuca idahoensis Idaho fescue 36. Poa secunda Sandberg’s bluebrass 37.
    [Show full text]
  • Bull Run Creek and Bull Run RNA Was Not Thoroughly Collected, Described Or Studied at the Time This Species List Was First Developed
    Flora of the Bull Run Creek and Bull Run RNA was not thoroughly collected, described or studied at the time this species list was first developed. It is based on observations of Jan Bal of the University of Idaho and collections and observations of Charles Wellner. Mike Hays (at that time Palouse Ranger District Botanist) added those species marked with (h) 5/24/1995 and used it for an INPS White Pine chapter field trip. 6/4/1995; (c1) indicates plants collected and deposited in UI Herbarium by Wellner (and/or Bal). Trees Abies grandis Grand fir Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa pine Betula papyrifera Paper birch Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas-fir Larix occidentalis Western larch Taxus brevifolia (h) Pacific Yew Pinus monticola Western white pine Thuja plicata Western redcedar ********************************************* ********************************************* Shrubs and Subshrubs Acer glabrous Rocky Mountain maple Prunus virginiana (h) Common chokecherry Alnus incana Mountain alder Rhamnus purshiana (h) Cascara Alnus sinuate Sitka alder Ribes lacustre (h) Prickly current Amelanchier alnifolia Western Serviceberry Rosa sp Wild rose Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnickinnick/Bearberry Rosa gymnocarpa (h) Wild rose Berberis repens Creeping Oregongrape Rubus idaeus var. peramoenus Red raspberry Ceanothus sanguineus Redstem ceonathus Rubus leucodermis (h) Chrsothamnus nauseosus (c1) Common rabbit-brush Rubus nivalis (h) Snow bramble Cornus Canadensis Bunchberry Rubus parviflorus (c1) Thimbleberry Cornus stolonifera Red-osier dogwood Rubus ursinus
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Strategy for Spalding's Campion (Silene Spaldingii) in British Columbia [Electronic Resource] (British Columbia Recovery Strategy Series)
    British Columbia Recovery Strategy Series Recovery Strategy for Spalding’s Campion (Silene spaldingii) in British Columbia Prepared by the Southern Interior Rare Plants Recovery Implementation Group March 2008 About the British Columbia Recovery Strategy Series This series presents the recovery strategies that are prepared as advice to the Province of British Columbia on the general strategic approach required to recover species at risk. The Province prepares recovery strategies to meet its commitments to recover species at risk under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada, and the Canada – British Columbia Agreement on Species at Risk. What is recovery? Species at risk recovery is the process by which the decline of an endangered, threatened or extirpated species is arrested or reversed, and threats are removed or reduced to improve the li kelihood of a species’ persistence in the wild. What is a recovery strategy? A recovery strategy represents the best available scientific knowledge on what is required to achieve recovery of a species or ecosystem. A recovery strategy outlines what is and what is not known about a species or ecosystem; it also identifies threats to the species or ecosystem, and what should be done to mitigate those threats. Recovery strategies set recovery goals and objectives, and recommend approaches to recover the species or ecosystem. Recovery strategies are usually prepared by a recovery team with members from agencies responsible for the management of the species or ecosystem, experts from other agencies, universities, conservation groups, aboriginal groups, and stakeholder groups as appropriate. What’s next? In most cases, one or more action plan(s) will be developed to define and guide implementation of the recovery strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyall's Mariposa Lily (Calochortus Lyallii)
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Lyall’s Mariposa Lily Calochortus lyallii in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2011 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2011. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Lyall’s Mariposa Lily Calochortus lyallii in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 34 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2001. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the the Lyall’s Mariposa Lily Calochortus lyallii in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 24 pp. M.T. Miller and G.W. Douglas. 2001. COSEWIC status report on the Lyall’s Mariposa Lily Calochortus lyallii in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Lyall’s Mariposa Lily Calochortus lyallii in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-24 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Michael Miller for writing the status report on Lyall’s Mariposa Lily Calochortus lyallii in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Erich Haber, Bruce Bennett, and Jeannette Whitton, COSEWIC Vascular Plants Specialist Subcommittee Co-chairs. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la calochorte de Lyall (Calochortus lyallii) au Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Lupinus Sabinianus Douglas Ex Lindl
    Lupinus sabinianus Douglas ex Lindl. synonym: Lupinus sabinii Douglas, Lupinus sericeus Pursh ssp. sabinii (Douglas ex Hook.) L. Phillips Sabin's lupine Fabaceae - pea family status: State Endangered, BLM strategic, USFS strategic rank: G4 / S1 General Description: Perennial herb from a branched crown, with several stems (5) 7-12 dm tall, usually with appressed, often yellowish hairs. Leaves palmately compound, mostly on the stems (when flowering), the lower with petioles up to twice the length of the blades, the upper with petioles and blades about equal. Leaflets 8-11, elliptic-oblanceolate to oblanc eolate, (4 ) 6 -1 2 (1 5 ) c m x (8 ) 1 0 -1 5 (2 5 ) mm, with s hort, s tiff appressed hairs on both surfaces. Floral Characteristics: Elongate raceme 1.5-3 dm; flowers nearly whorled, numerous, (13) 15-18 mm long; pedicels 8-11 mm long. C alyx asymmetrically two-lobed and covered with long, soft hairs. The upper lobe slightly bulged but not truly saccate or spurred with a shallowly notched upper lip, the lower entire. Petals usually bright yellow, Illustration by Jeanne R. Janish, sometimes purplish tinged. Banner hairless or with very few hairs on the ©1961 University of Washington back, the banner index 15-30; wings hairless, keel ciliate. Flowers May Press to June. Fruits: Pods flattened, 3-4.5 cm x 11-15 mm, with yellowish silky hairs. Seeds 4-7, pinkish brown. Identif ication Tips: Lupinus sericeus is similar but can be distinguished by its usually lavender or blue flowers (sometimes yellowish or whitish), smaller leaflets (3-6 [9] cm long), and silky-hairy banner.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Cedar Breaks National
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 ON THE COVER Peterson’s campion (Silene petersonii), Cedar Breaks National Monument, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 February 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientifi c literature reviews; and peer- reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • BLM Guidebook to the Seeds of Native and Non-Native Grasses, Forbs
    Guidebook to the Seeds of Native and Non-Native Grasses, Forbs and Shrubs of the Great Basin Including portions of Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Utah, Nevada and California By Scott Lambert Regional Seed Coordinator United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Idaho State Office 2005 Idaho BLM Technical Bulletin 2005-04 1 Guidebook to the Seeds of Native and Non-Native Grasses, Forbs and Shrubs of the Great Basin Including portions of Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Utah, Nevada and California. By Scott Lambert Regional Seed Coordinator United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Idaho State Office 2005 Acknowledgement: Several people contributed to the development of this Guidebook. I am especially indebted to the review and assistance provided by Mike Pellant, Roger Rosentreter, Jack Hamby and Amber Peterson of the Bureau of Land Management; Nancy Shaw of the US Forest Service Shrub Sciences Lab; and Stephen Bunting, James Kingery, Gerald Wright of the University of Idaho, and Rod Sayler of Washington State University. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 9 KEY TO PLANT ENTRIES...................................................................................................................... 11 GRASSES NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SPECIES IN THE GREAT BASIN ....12 LEMMON’S ALKALIGRASS.................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shrubland Ecosystem Genetics and Biodiversity: Proceedings; 2000 June 13–15; Provo, Suite of Locations
    Plant Diversity at Box-Death Hollow Wilderness Area, Garfield County, Utah Wendy Rosler Janet G. Cooper Renee Van Buren Kimball T. Harper Abstract—“The Box” is a canyon located in the western portion of Under the direction of Janet Cooper, the Provo High Box-Death Hollow Wilderness Area, Garfield County, southern School Botany Club initiated this study in the fall of 1993. Utah. The objectives of this study included: (1) collect, identify and During the following 2 years (1994 and 1995) five collection make a checklist of the species of vascular plants found in “The trips were taken at different times of the year to provide a Box,” (2) search for threatened and endangered species within the reliable sample of the canyon’s flora. Each collection trip area, (3) provide an opportunity for high school students to develop emphasized a different section of the canyon, but on each research skills that contribute to the reservoir of scientific informa- trip, specimens of species previously unknown in the area tion. During a period of 2 years, students of the Provo High School were collected throughout the canyon. Plants collected were Botany Club, the club advisor, and others collected and identified either immediately identified and pressed or collected in 304 species in 63 families. Twenty plant taxa collected during this plastic bags and pressed as soon as the group arrived back study had not previously been reported for Garfield County, UT. at camp. Identification and classification followed “A Utah Species-area relationships at this area are compared to selected Flora” (Welsh and others 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List Iron Mountain & Cone Peak
    *Non-native Iron Mountain & Cone Peak Plant List as of 2/7/2013 compiled by Tanya Harvey T13S.R5E.S36, R6E.S30,31 westerncascades.com FERNS & ALLIES Araliaceae Salicaceae Dennstaediaceae Oplopanax horridus Salix sitchensis Pteridium aquilinum Berberidaceae Sapindaceae Dryopteridaceae Berberis aquifolium Acer circinatum (Mahonia aquifolium) Polystichum munitum Acer glabrum var. douglasii Berberis nervosa Polypodiaceae HERBACEOUS DICOTS (Mahonia nervosa) Polypodium hesperium Apiaceae Betulaceae Polypodium sp. Angelica arguta Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata Pteridaceae (Alnus sinuata) Heracleum maximum (Heracleum lanatum) Aspidotis densa Corylus cornuta var. californica Lomatium martindalei Cheilanthes gracillima Caprifoliaceae Orogenia fusiformis Cryptogramma acrostichoides Symphoricarpos albus (Cryptogramma crispa) Osmorhiza berteroi Symphoricarpos mollis (Osmorhiza chilensis) Selaginellaceae (Symphoricarpos hesperius) Sanicula graveolens Selaginella scopulorum Celastraceae (Selaginella densa var. scopulorum) Paxistima myrsinites Aristolochiaceae Selaginella wallacei (Pachystima myrsinites) Asarum caudatum Woodsiaceae Ericaceae Asteraceae Athyrium filix-femina Arctostaphylos nevadensis Achillea millefolium Cystopteris fragilis Vaccinium membranaceum Adenocaulon bicolor TREES & SHRUBS: CONIFERS Vaccinium ovalifolium Agoseris aurantiaca Cupressaceae Grossulariaceae Anaphalis margaritacea Callitropsis nootkatensis Ribes binominatum Antennaria racemosa (Chamaecyparis nootkatensis) Ribes bracteosum Antennaria rosea Juniperus communis Ribes lacustre
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Washington Plant List
    The NatureMapping Program Revised: 9/15/2011 Eastern Washington Plant List - Scientific Name 1- Non- native, 2- ID Scientific Name Common Name Plant Family Invasive √ 1141 Abies amabilis Pacific silver fir Pinaceae 1 Abies grandis Grand fir Pinaceae 1142 Abies lasiocarpa Sub-alpine fir Pinaceae 762 Abronia mellifera White sand verbena Nyctaginaceae 1143 Abronia umbellata Pink sandverbena Nyctaginaceae 763 Acer glabrum Douglas maple Aceraceae 3 Acer macrophyllum Big-leaf maple Aceraceae 470 Acer platinoides* Norway maple Aceraceae 1 5 Achillea millifolium Yarrow Asteraceae 1144 Aconitum columbianum Monkshood Ranunculaceae 8 Actaea rubra Baneberry Ranunculaceae 9 Adenocaulon bicolor Pathfinder Asteraceae 10 Adiantum pedatum Maidenhair fern Polypodiaceae 764 Agastache urticifolia Nettle-leaf horse-mint Lamiaceae 1145 Agoseris aurantiaca Orange agoseris Asteraceae 1146 Agoseris elata Tall agoseris Asteraceae 705 Agoseris glauca Mountain agoseris Asteraceae 608 Agoseris grandiflora Large-flowered agoseris Asteraceae 716 Agoseris heterophylla Annual agoseris Asteraceae 11 Agropyron caninum Bearded wheatgrass Poaceae 560 Agropyron cristatum* Crested wheatgrass Poaceae 1 1147 Agropyron dasytachyum Thickspike wheatgrass Poaceae 739 Agropyron intermedium* Intermediate ryegrass Poaceae 1 12 Agropyron repens* Quack grass Poaceae 1 744 Agropyron smithii Bluestem Poaceae 523 Agropyron spicatum Blue-bunch wheatgrass Poaceae 687 Agropyron trachycaulum Slender wheatgrass Poaceae 13 Agrostis alba* Red top Poaceae 1 799 Agrostis exarata* Spike bentgrass
    [Show full text]