<<

21

The Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 32, pp. 21-30 (1994)

A-SITE DISORDER IN SYNTHETIC FLUOR-EDENITE, A CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE STUDY

KATHLEEN F. BOSCHMANN, PETER C. BURNS, FRANK C. HAWTHORNE, MATI RAUDSEPP1 AND ALLAN C. TURNOCK

Depanmentof Geological Sciences, Universityof Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2

ABS1RACT

Large crystals of were synthesized by slow cooling of a bulk composition nominally that of end-member fluor-edenite. Electron-microprobe analysis shows the crystals to be zoned from a core composition close to end-member fluor-edenite to a rim composition close to the fluor- - fluor-pargasite join. The of a fragment of average composition Na0 2(Ca1.926Mg0.183)(Mg4.636Al0.364)(Si6.507Al1.493)022F2, a 9.821(1), b 17.934(4), c 5.282(1) A, ,9j � 105.08(1)0, V 898.3(1) A, C21m, Z = 2, was refmed to an R index of 2.9% for 1068 observed reflections collected with MoKcx X-radiation. Tetrahedrally coordinated Al is ordered at T(l), and octahedrally coordinated Al is ordered at M(2). The Na within the A-site cavity occupies both the A(m) and A(2) sites, and site-occupancy refmement shows Na to be equally partitioned between these two sites. This ordering scheme can be explained on the basis of local bond-valence requirements of the anions coordinating the T(1) site.

Keywords: amphibole, fluor-edenite, synthesis, crystal-structure refinement, ordering, electron-microprobe analyses.

SOMMAIRE

Nous avons reussi a synthetiser de gros cristaux d'amphibole en refroidissant lentement un melange d'une composition globale egale a celle du pole fluor-edenite. Une analyse a Ia microsonde electronique demontre que ces cristaux sont zones, d'un coeur dont Ia composition est celle qui etait prevue a une bordure dont Ia composition est proche de Ia solution solide fluor-tremolite - fluor-pargasite. La structure cristalline d'un fragment dont Ia composition moyenne serait Nao.912(Ca1.926Mgo.Js3)(M�.636Alo.364)(Si6.507Al1.493)022F2, a 9.821(1), b 17.934(4), c 5.282(1) A, � 105.08(1)0, V 898.3(1) 3 A , C2/m, Z = 2, a ete affinee jusqu'a un residu R de 2.9% en utilisant 1068 reflexions observees (rayonnement MoKcx). L'aluminium a coordinence tetraedrique occupe T(1), tandis que !'aluminium a coordinence octaedrique occupe M(2). Le Na du site A occupe les sites A(m) et A(2); l'affmement indique une repartition egale de l'atome Na entre ces deux sites. Ce schema de mise en ordre decoule des exigeances locales des valences de liaisons des anions en coordinence avec T(l).

(Tradnit par Ia Redaction)

Mots-cles: amphibole, fluor-edenite, synthese, affinement de Ia structure cristalline, mise en ordre, donnees de microsonde electronique.

INTRODUCTION crystals. Na et al. (1986) reported the coexistence of diopside and sodian phlogopite up to 3 kbar within the There have been several attempts to synthesize field of edenite - richterite (- tremolite) solid solution, edenite, ideally NaCa2Mg5Si7Al022(0H)2, but none of and the results of Raudsepp et al. (1991) are broadly themhave been very successful. Widmark (1974) and compatible with this. Thus the edenite end-member Hinrichsen & Schi.irmann (1977) both reported the has not been synthesized as yet, and there is a strong synthesis of edenite, but the run yields were low, and possibility that it may not be stable. On the other hand, Greenwood (1979) concluded that Widmark (1974) fluor-edenite has been synthesized on end-member had synthesized overgrowths of tremolite on his seed composition (Graham & Navrotsky 1986). Raudsepp

'Present address: Department of Geological Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4. 22 TilE CANADIAN MINERALOGIST et al. (1991) attempted to synthesize large crystals of fluor-edenite by slow cooling of the nominal bulk composition from above the liquidus. Although elec­ tron-microprobe analysis showed that the crystals depart from the ideal fluor-edenite composition, the crystals were sufficiently large to characterize by crystal-structure refinement; the results are presented here.

EXPERIMENTAL

Synthesis

Forty mg of starting materials (fused silica glass, y-Al203, CaF2, Na2C03, MgO) were sealed in a -1A-- 4 x 23 mm Pt tube and placed in a conventional verti­ cal quench-furnace. The run was held at 1240°C for 1 h and then cooled to 816°C over a period of 332 h. Further experimental details are given by Raudsepp et al. (1991). In general, the run products were >90% amphibole, with minor forsterite, plagioclase, clinopyroxene and cristobalite. One particular run gave one large crystal (-10 x 3 mm) with minor fine-grained non-amphibole phases; this crystal was gently crushed to give more conveuiently sized fragments, one of which was used in thepresent study.

Collection of the X-raydata

An irregular lath-like fragment of synthetic fluor­ edenite was mounted on a Nicolet R3m automated four-circle diffractometer. Twenty-two reflections were centered using graphite-monochromated MoKa X-radiation. The unit-cell dimensions (Table 1) were derived from the setting angles of twenty-two auto­ matically aligned reflectionsby least-squares methods. A total of 1435 reflections was measured over the range (3° < 29 < 60°) with index ranges 0 � h � 13, 0 � k � 25, -7 � l � 7; reflections forbidden by the C face-centering were omitted. Two standard reflections were measured every fifty reflections; no significant changes in their net intensities occurred during data

TABLE 1. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION FOR FLUOR-EDENITE

Space group C2/m Crystal size (mm) 0.1Ox0.24x0. 1 0 FIG. 1. Difference-Fourier sections throughthe centralA(2/m) site with the A cation removed from the structural model: a(A) 9.821(1) Total Ref. 1435 (a) (100) section at x = 0; (b) (010) section at y = \12; (c) b!Al 17.934(4) [l(obsl > 2.5a(l)) 1068 section through the electron-density maxima on the 2-fold c(A) 5.282(1) axis and in the mirror plane, approximately parallel to Pl0l 105.08(1) Final Rlobs) 2.9% (201).In (a) and (b), the contour interval is 1 e/A3• In (c), VIA3l 898.3(1) Final wR!obs) 3.0% the contour interval is 1 e/A3 below 6 e!A3, and 0.1 e!A3 above 6 e/M; only this close contouring at high levels of Ideal cell contents: 2(NaCsaMg,Si,AIO,.F2l density brings out the separate maxima on the 2-fold axis cell contents: Analyzed 2!Na..812Cs,..,.Mo..so1Aio.-1Si�..,AI1,492)022F21 and within the mirror plane, and emphasizes the minimum R = IIIFoi·IFcl}f IIFol at thecentral (0 \12 0) position;this minimum is dot-shaded wR = !Iw!JFoJ·JFcJl'IIwf'!I"'· w=1 todistinguish it fromthe surrounding maxima. A-SITE DISORDER IN FLUOR-EDENITE 23 collection. An empirical absorption-correction based TABLE 2. ANAL POSITIONAL PARAMifrERS AND EQUIVALENT ISOTROPIC DISPLACEMENi PARAMETERS on 396 psi-scan intensities was applied, reducing R (.A2x104) FOR FLUOR-EDENITI: (azimuthal) from 1.3 to 0.9%. The data were corrected for Lorentz, polarization and background effects, and X y 11 u..,... reduced to structure factors; of the 1435 reflections n1l 0.28176(8) 0.08479(4) 0.3025(2) 82(2) measured, there were 1068 unique observed [I � 2.5o(I)] reflections. n2l 0.29057(8) 0.17251(4) 0.8113(2) 71(2} M(1) 0 0.08902(7) 1/2 66(4)

Structure refinement M(2) 0 0.17547(7) 0 64(4)

M(3) 0 0 0 66(6) Scattering curves for neutral atoms, together with M(4) 0 0.27854(5) 1/2 115(3) anomalous dispersion corrections, were taken from Cromer & Mann (1968) and Cromer & Liberman A(m)** 0.0415(9) 1/2 0.0953(20) 200* (1970), respectively. The Siemens SHELXTL PLUS A(2)** 0 0.4765(5) 0 200*

(PC Version) system of programs was used throughout 0(1) 0.1084(2) 0.0860(1) 0.2182(4} 97(5) this study. R indices are of the form given in Table 1, 0(2) 0.1191(2) 0.1714(1) 0.7312(4) 91(5) and are expressed as percentages. Least-squares refinement of the structure in the 0(3) 0.1044(3) 0 0.7133(5} 107(7) space group C2/m, with starting parameters taken from 0(4) 0.3656(2) 0.2504(1) 0.7884(4) 115(6) Hawthorne (1983) and an isotropic displacement 0(5) 0.3511 (2) 0.1391(1) 0.1108(4) 128(6) model, converged to an R index of 5.1%. Conversion 0(6) 0.3462(2) 0.1164(1) 0.6075(4) 133(6) to an anisotropic displacement model, together with the refinement of all parameters, converged to a 0(7) 0.3448(3) 0 0.2784(7) 129(8) wR R index of 3.2% and a index of 3.3%. A model . with weighted structure-factors and an isotropic fixed during refinement • * A(ml and A(2) populations are 0.24(1 land 0.25(1l Na, extinction correction was tried but did not lead to any respectively. improvement in the refinement. As is usual for amphi­ boles with a fullA -site, the A(2/m) displacement factor was found to be very large (U "' 0.16), indicative of significant positional disorder in the cavity sur­ TABLE 3. ANISOTROPIC DISPLACEMENT PARAMETERS CA"x104) rounding theA site (Hawthorne & Grundy 1972). This FOR FLUOR-EDENITE feature is of considerable interest in the present case u, u22 u.. u.. u,. u,. because of the fairly simple composition of the amphi­ 78(4) 84(3) 80(3) -2(3) 14(3) -3(2) bole. TheA cation was removed from the refinement T(1) model, and a series of difference-Fourier maps were n21 66(3) 79(3} 67(3) 2(3) 14(2) -3(3) calculated through the A site (Fig. 1). The (100) M(1) 75(7) 69(6) 56(7) 0 20(6) 0 section at x = 0 shows significant displacement of M(2) 61(6) 70(6) 62(7) 0 19(4) 0 the maximum electron-density along the 2-fold axis M(3) 68(9) 57(9) 68(9) 0 7(6) 0

(Fig. la) parallel to [010], the A(2) position. The (010) M(4) 134(4) 110(4) 120(4) 0 67(3) 0 section at y = 1/z shows significant displacement of the 0(1) 81(8) 122(9) 89(9) ·13(7) 24(7) -13(7) maximum electron-density within the mirror plane 90(8) 7(7) (Fig. lb), the A(m) site. In order to assess the relative 0(2) 83(8) 91(5) 12(7) 2(7) electron-densities at these different sites, a difference­ 0(3) 106(11) 110(10) 111(11) 0 40(9) 0 Fourier map was calculated in the plane of the maxi­ 0(4) 140(9) 94(8) 119(9) -3(7) 46(8) -26(7) mum electron-density through the central A-site 0(5) 111(9) 157(9) 107(9) 43(8) 13(7) -7(7) (Fig. lc). Note the variability in contour intervals in 0(6) 102(9) 158(10) 136(10) -52(8) 28(8) 13(7) thissection: above 6 e/A3, the interval is 0.1 e, where­ 0(7) 117(13) 107(12) 174(14) 0 56(11) 0 as below 6 e/A 3, itis 1.0 e; this was done to emphasize the relative electron-densities at the A(2) and A(m) positions, and to show that there is an electron-density minimum (dotted) at the central A(2/m) position. Figure lc indicates that there is very slightly less isotropic displacement factors were used for the A(m) electron-density at A(m) relative to A(2), but the and A(2) positions, and were fixed at 0.02 for each difference is very small, and thus the electron­ site. Full-matrix least-squares refmement converged to densities are approximately the same. an R index of 2.9% and an wR index of 3.0%. Final The coordinates of the A(m) and A(2) positions positional parameters and equivalent isotropic were taken from the difference-Fourier maps, and displacement parameters are given in Table 2, Na was initially split equally between the two sites; anisotropic displacement parameters in Table 3 and 24 THE CANADIAN MINERALOGIST

TABLE 4. SELECTED INTeRATOMIC DISTANct!S (.&,l AND ANGLES (0) TABLE 4. (cont.) FOR FLUOR-EDEN(TE --- n2l tetrahedron nll-0(1) 1.644(2) Ml2l-0(1} x2 2.097(2) 0(2)-0(4) 2.763(3) o<2l-n2l-014l 117.3(1) nll-0(5) 1.673(3) · M(2)-0(2)b x2 2.062(2) _ 0(2)-0(6) 2.670(3) 0121-n21-0I6l 108.6(1) nll-0(6) 1.670(2) M(2)-0(4lc x2 1.998(2) 0(2)-0(5)a 2.678(3) 0(2)-n2l-0(6)a 109.6(1) nll-0(7) � � 0(4)-0(6) 2.674(3) 014l-n21-0!6l 104.1(1) � 0(4)-0(5)a 2.661(3) Oi4l-n2l-OI5la 109.3(1) Ml3l-011l x4 2.050(2) 0(6)-0(5)a 2.676(3) 0161-n2l-OI5la 107.6(1) n2l-OI2l 1.626(2) Ml3l-013la x2 2.037(3) n2l-OI4l 1.598(2) .. � � � n21-0I6l 1.666(3) M(1) octahedron n2l-OI5la 1.65112) M(4)-0(2) x2 2.410(2) 0(1)-0(2) x2 3.090(3) 011l-M(1)-012l x2 97.3(1) M14l-014lc x2 2.319(2) � 011 l-0(3) x2 3.047(3) 0(1)-M(1)-0(3) x2 95.7(1) M(4)-0(6)c x2 2.642(2) 0(1 l-0(2)d x2 2.780(3) 011l-MI1l-012ld x2 84.9(1) Ml1l-0(1) x2 2.044(2) Ml4l-0(6)c x2 2.569(2) 0(1l-013ld x2 2.696(3) 0(1)-M(1)-0(3)d x2 82.0(1) M(1)-0(2) x2 2.074(2) � 0(2)-0(3) x2 3.077(2) 0(2)-MI1)-0(3) x2 96.0(1) Ml1l-0(3) x2 2.066(2) 0(2)-0(2)d 2.910(4) 012l-MI1l-0(2)d 89.1(1) A-0(5) x4 3.024(2) � 0(3)-0(3)d 2.624(6) 013l-MI1l-013ld 78.9(1) A-0(6) x4 3.051(2) A-0(7) x4 2.380(4) � � � Ml2l octahedron

Alm)-0(5) x2 3.020(7) Al2l-0(5l x2 2.687(7) 0(1)-0(2)b x2 3.019(3) 011l-MI2l-012lb x2 93.1(1)

A(m)-0(6) x2 3.131(6) A12l-0(6) x2 · 3.382(8) 0(1)-0(2)d x2 2.780(3) 011l-MI2l-012ld x2 83.8(1) A(m)-0(6) x2 2.672(6) A(2)-0(6) x2 2.779(6) 0(1)-0(4)c x2 2.946(3) 011 l-M(2)-0(4)c x2 92.011) Alm)-016) x2 3.479(7) Al2l-016l x2 3.354(7) 0(2)d-014lc x2 2.941(3) 0(2)d-MI2l-0(4)c x2 92.8(1)

A(m)-0(7) 2.375(11) A12l-017l x2 • 2.415(4) 012ld-t114lf x2 2.869(3) 012ld-MI2l-014lf x2 89.9(1) Alml-0(7) 2.509(12) A (2)-0(7) x2 . 3.473(6) 0(1)-0(1)e 2.702(4) 011 l-MI2l-011 le 80.211) A(m)-0(7) 3.204(10) 0(4)c-014lf 2.982(4) 0(4)c-MI2l-014lf 96.5(1) Alml-0(7) 4.244(11) <0-0> � <0-M(2)-0> �

n 1) tetrahedron M(3) octahedron

0(1)-0(5) 2.759(3) 0(1)-T(1)-0(5) 112.6(1) 0(1)-0(3)a x4 3.070(3) 011 l-M(3)-0(3)a x4 97.4(1) 0(1)-0(6) 2.735(3) 0(1)-T(1)-0(6) 111.3(1) 0(1)-0(3)e x4 2.696(3) 011l-Mi3)-0(3)e x4 82.6(1) 0(1)-0(7) 2.734(3) 0(1)-T(1)-0(7) 111.8(1) 011l·OI1lg x2 2.702(4) 0(1)-M(3)·0(1)g x2 82.4(1) 0(5)-0(6) 2.669(3) Ol5l-n1l-OI6l 106.0(1) 0(1)-011lh x2 3.084(4) 0(1)-M(3)-0(1 )h x2 97.6(1) 0(5)-0(7) 2.654(3) 0(5)-nl)-0(7) 105.6(2) 2.886 90.00 0(6)-0(7) 2.714(3) OIBl-m 1-om 109.3(1) <0-0> 2.711 <0-T(1)-0> 109.4 M(4) polyhadron

0(2)-0(2)e 2.910(4) 012l-MI4l-0(2)e 74.3(1) 012l-014lc x2 3.121(3) Ol2l-MI4l-014lc x2 82.6(1) selected bond-distances, angles and polyhedral edge- 0(2)-0(4)i x2 2.941(3) 0(2)-Mi4)-0(4)i x2 76.9(1) lengths are given in Table 4. Observed and calculated 0(2)-0(5)c x2 3.494(3) 012l-MI4l-016lc x2 87.4(1) structure-factors are available from the Depository of 0(4)c-0(5)i x2 3.352(3) 0(4)c-M(4)-0(5)i x2 84.7(1) Unpublished Data, CISTI, National Research Council 0(4)c-0(6)c x2 2.674(3) 0(4)c-MI4)-0(6lc x2 63.3(1) of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario KIA OS2. 0(5)c-0(6)c x2 2.669(3) 0(6)c-M(4)-0(6)c x2 61.6(1) 0(5)c-0(6)j x2 2.985(3) 0(6)c-M(4)-0(6)j x2 69.9(1) 0(6)c-0(6)j 3.493(6) 0(6)c-MI4l-016lj 85.6(1) Electron-microprobe analysis

Following collection of the X-ray intensity data, the a= x, y, z+1; b = x, y, z-1; c = Y..-x, Y..-y, 1-z; d = -x, y, 1-z; crystal was mounted in �poxy, polished, carbon-coated e= -x, y, 1-z; f = x-Y.., Y.o-y, z-1; g = -x, y, -z; h= x, -y, z; i = x-%, *-y, z; j = x+ %, y-%, z and analyzed by electron microprobe. The analyses were done on a fully automated Cameca SX-50 according to the procedure of Raudsepp et al. (1991). As a control on accuracy, diopside and forsterite of in Table 5. As the chemical composition of this crystal known compositions were analyzed at the same time; is a very important factor in this work, we repeated the these showed close agreement with the nominal com- electron-microprobe analysis (a different set of positions. Ten points were analyzed on the crystal; the 10 points) several months later, and bracketed the results of individual analyses are given in Table 5, as analysis of fluor-edenite by analysis of a sample of significant zoning is present in the crystal. The aver- olivine and one of diopside of known compositions. age composition was calculated from the distribution The latter compositions determined here were found to of compositions over the crystal, and this also is given be accurate, supporting the results for fluor-edenite; A-SITE DISORDER IN FLUOR-EDENITE 2 5

'TABLE 5. RESULTS OF ELECTRON-MICROPROBE ANALYSIS EDENITE PARGASITE OF SYNTHETIC 'FLUOR-EDENITE'

End- Min.• Max.• Mean• Mean' member

Si02 48.78 44.67 46.76 47.22 60.16

Al203 8.98 13.36 11.32 11.00 6.08

MgO 24.04 22.87 23.23 23.16 24.06

CeO 12.46 13.11 12.92 13.03 13.38

Na20 3.58 3.17 3.38 3.41 3.70

F 6.14 6.23 6.08 5.01 4.63

OaF -2.16 -2.20 -2.14 -2.11 -1.91

Total** 100.81 100.10 100.56 100.72 100.00

Si 6.766 6.225 6.507 6.555 7.000

AI 1.246 1.775 1.493 1.445 1.000

IT 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 TREMOLITE AI 0.221 0.432 0.364 0.355 (6�1

Mg 4.963 4.783 4.819 4.793 5.000

IC 5.184 5.215 6.183 5.148 5.000 FIG. 2. Variation in composition with regard toA-site Na and [6] -coordinated AI across the crystal used for the collec­

Mg 0.208 0.215 0.183 0.148 tion of X-ray intensity data.

Ce 1.849 1.970 1.926 1.938 2.000

2.057 2.185 2.109 2.086 2.000

0.961 0.862 0.912 0.918 1.000 Na indicates that the composition of the stable amphibole

• from first set of analytical results; in this system is very sensitive to the temperature t from second set of analytical results; of crystallization. • • the totals are a trifle high; using the ideal F-content reduces The site populations in this crystal are of particular tham by -0.5 wt%. interest. Firstly, the composition is simpler than most natural , and there should be close agree­ ment with established site-population and stereo­ the latter are similar to the values obtained previously chemical relations. Secondly, this composition (Table 5), and also suggested that the mean compo­ provides an opportunity to examine A-cation posi­ sition is fairly representative of the whole crystal. tional disorder (Hawthorne & Grundy 1972) for a Unit formulae were calculated on the basis of 23 simple A-site chemistry with [4lAJ present and Fat the ' equivalent oxygen atoms. The analyzed F values 0(3) position. (-5.1 wt%)are slightly higher than the nominal value The C- and T-group cations'are Mg;Aland Si, with (4.5 wt%); as the structure cannot accommodate Fin atomic numbers of 12, 13 and 14, respectively. These excess of the ideal amount, the analyzed values are scatter X rays in a very similar fashion, and hence we thus a little high (albeit equal to the nominal value cannot use site-scattering refinement to derive site within two standard deviations). populations. However, thesB· cations are of very differ­

ent sizes ([6lMg :::: 0.72 , [6lAl :::: 0.535, [4lAl = 0.39, DISCUSSION [4lSi :::: 0.26 A; Shannon 1976) and thus the mean bond-lengths can be used to derive the site popula­ Although the ideal composition of the synthesized tions. crystal is end-member fluor-edenite, both the electron­ microprobe analyses and the X-ray data show that it T(1) andT(2) sites deviates significantly from this composition. The com­ positional variation in the fragment used for the X-ray For an amphibole of this composition, [4lAl work (Fig. 2) lies within the compositional field of is expected to order at T(l). In synthetic fluor­ edenite. The spatial distribution of compositions amphiboles with no [4lAl, "' 1.632 A shows that the original crystal had a core close to (Table 6); hence T(2) ·:::: Si in fluor-edenite. On the (or perhaps on) the ideal end-member composition, other hand, the obse!Ved distance of 1.661 becoming richer in tschermakite component (i.e., A in fluor-edenite is much larger than the mean moving toward the tremolite - pargasite join) toward value for complete Si occupancy of T(l): the edge of the crystal. As the crystal grew during 1.62 0 A (Table 6}; consequently, [4lAl is completely slow cooling, the observed variation in composition ordered at T(l). Hawthorne & Grundy (1977) and 26 THE CANADIAN MINERALOGIST

TABLE 6. SELECTED MEAN BOND-LENGTHS CAl IN SYNTHETIC cation radius. A value of 2.055 A is obtained, in good FLUOR-AMPHIBOLES agreement with the observed value of 2.053 A. Ruor- Ruor- K-fluor- Ruor- richterito tromollte richterite edenite Ungaretti et al. (1981) and Hawthorne (1983) have published "ideal" distances for specific T{1) Si Si Sf (Sf .All cations; using these values, (binary) site populations 1.622 1.620 1.619 1.661 can be derived algebraically from observed mean

n21 Si Si Si Si bond-lengths. These procedures give M(2) occu­ 1.632 1.629 1.634 1.635 pancies of (Mg0_832Al0.168) and (Mg0.798Al0.202), respectively, both in close agreement with the elec­ M(1) Mg Mg Mg Mg tron-microprobevalues of (Mg0.818Al0.18z). 2.050 2.054 2.052 2.061

M(2) Mg Mg Mg (Mg,AI) M(4) site 2.087 2.082 2.088 2.053 The formula unit calculated from the results of the M(3) Mg Mg Mg Mg electron-microprobe analysis has a C-group cation 2.041 2.040 2.044 2.045 excess of Mg (0.18 apfu, Table 5). Where calcic, M(4) Na,12Ca112 Co Na112Ca112 Co sodic--calcic and alkali amphiboles contain significant '� 2.544 2.459 2.555 2.485 amounts of B-group cations (Fe2+,Mn,Mg), careful

Ref. (1) (2) (1) (3) structure-refmementhas shown the presence of signif­ icant electron-density at M(4'), a site very close to Refs: (1) Cameron et al. (1983); (2) Cameron & Gibbs (1973); M(4) but displaced along the 2-fold axis toward the (3) this study. octahedral strip (Oberti et al. 1992). Difference­ Fourier maps of fluor-edenite, calculated with the M(4) cation removed from themodel, show no sign of an M(4') site, and neither didanalogous Fourier maps. Bocchio et al. (1978) both gave predictive curves for An M(4') site was inserted into the refmement proce­ the amount of l4lAI in amphibole based on dis­ dure, but refined to zero Mg occupancy. Refinement tances; the predicted values are 1.40 and 1.56 AI pfu of the total scattering at the M(4) site gave a value of (per formula unit), respectively, bracketing the 38.96 epfu (electrons per formula unit), supporting the observedvalue of 1.49 AI pfu. Ca content of the unit formula (-1.93 apfu) derived by electron-microprobe analysis. Thus there is a defi­ TheM(l) andM(3) sites ciency in scattering relative to occupancy of M(4) by 2.0 Ca apfu, but another (displaced) site is not appar­ The C-group cations occupy these sites, and the ent. This gives us three possibilities: (1) the balance composition of the crystal constrains the site popula­ of the M(4) occupancy (-0.10 apfu) is Mg; in this tions to be (Mg, AI). Inspection of Table 6 shows the case, Mg must occupy the M(4) site rather than the M(l) and M(3) sites to be completely occupied by Mg. M(4') site, or we would be able to distinguish the The distance of 2.061 A is slightly larger M(4') site. (2) The balance of the M(4) occupancy is than the average distance of 2.052 A for Na; in this case, one would expect Na to occupy the the other syntheticfluor-amphiboles (Table 6). As the M(4) site (and hence there would be no scattering only other possible constituent of this site is much from an M(4') site. (3) All Mg occurs at M(4), and a smaller than Mg, thismeans that the M(l) site must be small amount of Ca occurs at the A site. occupied completely by Mg. The distance If significant Mg were to occur at the A site, this of 2.045 A is statistically equal to the average should be visible as a separate site [probably a sepa­ value of 2.042 A for the other synthetic rate A(2) position] because of the short Mg-0 bonds fluor-amphiboles,and hence M(3) must be completely required; no such site was visible in difference-Fourier occupied by Mg. maps. Thus it seems reasonable to adopt that model with the minimum amount of Mg at the A site [model TheM(2) site (3)]. The problem with this model is that there is no M(4') site to accept the Mg; possibly the Mg assumes The expected distance for complete Mg a more disordered position than Fe2+ or Mn2+ if it is a occupancy of M(2) is 2.086 A, significantly larger B-group cation (in calcic amphiboles). This model is than the observed value of 2.053 A for not entirely satisfactory, but we consider it to be fluor-edenite. This indicates occupancy of M(2) by AI slightly better than the other two possibilities. as well as Mg. Assigning all of the l6lAI (Table 5) to The observed distance of 2.485 A in the M(2) site, we can calculate the expected fluor-edenite is significantly larger than that in fluor­ distance from the curve of Hawthorne tremolite, 2 .459 A (Table 6), in which M(4) also is (1983) relating distance to constituent occupied by Ca. However, this difference is inducti- A-SITEDISORDER IN FLUOR-EDENITE 27 vely caused by stereochemical differences in the rest A(m) site, whereas the excess is still present if K of the structure (Hawthorne 1983), particularly the resides at A(2); thus K will order at the A(m) site presence of the A cation in fluor-edenite. Comparison because it is only at this site that its bond-valence with the mean M(4) bond-length in the pargasite of requirements are satisfied. The situation is less clear Bocchio et al. (1978), where M(4) "" Ca and A "" for Na. There is still significant bond-valence defi­ ' (Na,O), show these two structures to be very similar ciency at the cation if Na occurs at A(2) [bond-valence in this respect. sums average -0.86 v.u.] or at A(m), and it is not fea­ sible to make predictions on this basis. Possibly this TheA(m) andA(2) sites reflects the much more complex behavior of Na rela­ tive to K at the A site. Much work has been done on this particular aspect The complex behavior of Na is presumably related of amphibole structure. Heritsch (1955) refined to the local next-nearest-neighbor cation arrange­ the structure of an edenitic hornblende and noted the ments, as these will produce local variations in the A-site Na displaced along the 2-fold axis at the bond-valence incident to the anions surrounding A(2) site. Prewitt (1963) and Gibbs & Prewitt (1968) theA(2) position, together with associated bond-length reported Na occupancy of the A(2) site in synthetic relaxations. Factors that will be important in this Na2H2Co5Si8022(0H)2 and Na occupancy of A(m) in respect include the [4lAI content and its ordering over synthetic N�H2Mg5Si8022F2, and Gibbs (1966) sug­ T(1) and T(2) (Hawthorne & Grundy 1977), content gested that A(2) or A(m) is occupied if 0(3) is OH and ordering of tri- and tetravalent cations in the octa­ or F, respectively.Papike et al. (1969) reported strong hedral strip (Hawthorne & Grundy 1973a), the identity ordering at the A(m) site in potassian titanian of the 0(3) anion (Gibbs & Prewitt 1968), and the magnesio-hastingsite and potassian magnesio­ nature of the B cations [i.e., Na or Ca at the surround­ kataphorite; in both these crystals, the dominant ing M(4) sites (Cameron et al. 1983)]. However, most A cation is K. Hawthorne & Grundy (1972, 1973a,b) natural amphiboles have too complicated a bulk com­ proposed that positional disorder occurs between the position to be able to untangle the competing A(2) andA(m) sites. Hawthorne & Grundy (1978) test­ influences of these possible factors, and the relative ed numerous models for a potassian ferri-taramite, and importance of these effects is still uuresolved. concluded that the best model involves disorder over A(2) and A(m), with ordering of K at A(m) and order­ Energetic considerations ing of Na atA(2). Ungaretti (1980) and Ungaretti et al. (1981) documented A-site disorder in a wide range of Docka et al. (1987) have taken a different approach natural amphiboles; they showed that K does order at to this problem; they modeled the various possibilities the A(m) site, but that Na occurs both at theA(m) and for local ordering with techniques of structure-energy A(2) sites. Cameron et al. (1983) refmed the structures minimization. Their calculations suggest that ifa local of potassian fluor-richterite and fluor-richterite. They charge-configuration at the second-nearest-neighbor showed that K orders at A(m), but proposed that Na cation sites around the A site obeys a symmetry ele­ occupies the general positionA(1) (i.e., Wyckoff posi­ ment (or combination of symmetryelements), the min­ tion 8j in C'2Jm). Thus it seems well established thatK imum energy position for the A cation lies on that orders at A(m), and that Na can be disordered over the symmetry element (or combination of symmetry A(m) and A(2) positions, and possibly also occupies elements). If the local charge arrangement is asym­ theA(1) position. metrical, the minimum-energy position lies on the general positionA(1) (8j). However, calculations for Bond-valence arguments K show the minimum-energy position to lie on or close to the mirror plane. This is compatible with the There have been many suggestions as to the impor­ observation of K always at the A(m) position, as it is tant factors affectingA-site ordering in amphiboles. probable that neither the calculation nor the structure From the above discussion, it is obvious that the most refmements are sensitive to the very small displace­ important feature is the identity of the cation: ments that constitute the difference between the two K behaves differently from Na. Hawthorne & Grundy sets of results. The situation for Na is more involved. (1978) and Hawthorne (1983) examined this aspect of The minimum-energy positions for asymmetrical the problem with bond-valence theory (Brown arrangements of charges lie at the A(1) position, but & Shannon 1973, Brown 1981). For a variety of closer to A(2) thanA(m). In some cases, the distance amphiboles, they showed that if K is placed atA(2/m), between the energy minimum and theA(2) position is there is a bond-valence excess at the cation, whereas if below the resolution of X rays, and A(2) occupancy Na is placed at A(2/m), there is a bond-valence defi­ would be observed even if the A(1) positions were ciency at the cation. This suggests that K and Na will occupied. In other instances, this is not the case, and behave differently with regard to A-site ordering. The A(1) occupancy should be observable by structure bond-valence excess at K vanishes if K occupies the refinement if the calculations are accurate. 28 TilE CANADIAN MINERALOGIST

Results for fluor-edenite the A cavity is surrounded by eight equivalent T(l) 1etrahedra, these tetrahedra are not all equivalent The difference- Fourier maps (Fig. 1) show that through the point-symmetry operations at the A(2/m) A(m) and A(2) are both occupied; there is a minimum position. This is illustrated diagrammatically in at the A(2/m) position and a saddle-point at the A(1) Figure 3. Consider first the A site on the left of the position. Thus the A(l) position is not occupied within figure. The adjoining T(l) sites fall into two sets, T(l)' the resolution of the X-ray method. Furthermore, site­ and T(l)", that are distinct with regard to the point scattering refinement shows Na (+ minor Ca) to be symmetry at the A(2/m) position. Thus when consi­ equally partitioned between the A(2) and A(m) sites. dering energy calculations based on a single cluster Firstly, we can say that the ordering is not the result of centered on one A(2/m) site, it is necessary to treat (OH,F) substitution at 0(3) or (Ca,Na) substitution at substitutions at the T( I)' and T( I)" sites as distinct. M(4), as these do not occur for this specific compo­ Inspection of Table 4 shows that A(2) has short sition. Similarly, the suggestion of Hawthorne bonds to 0(5) and 0(7), whereas A(m) has short bonds & Grundy (1978) that K orders at A(m) and Na orders to 0(6). Adjacent A cavities are connected, and each at A(2) is not correct. From the above discussion of T(l) tetrahedron is adjacent to two cavities (Fig. 3). site populations in the structure, the only possible This immediately suggests a reason for the equally factors affecting the local arrangement of charges are occupied A(2) and A(m) sites in the fluor-edenite (Al,Si) disorder at T(l) and (Al,Mg) disorder at M(2). crystal examined here. If a specific T(l) site is occu­ Docka et al. (198 7) found the minimum-energy pied by Al, the adjacent 0(5), 0(6) and 0(7) anions position for the case of Al occupancy of T(1) at the have a significant bond-valence deficiency. In one A(l) position, with an A(l)-A(l) displacement of adjacent A-cavity, Na occupies the A(m) position and -0.6 A across the 2-fold axis. This is not compatible increases the bond-valence incident to the associated with the results for this fluor-edenite (Fig. 1, Table 2). 0(6) anion. In the other adjacent A-cavity, Na occu­ Either the small amount of l6lAl has drastically altered pies the A(2) position and increases the bond-valence the general energetic situation here, or the omission incident to the associated 0(5) and 0(7) anions. Each of local relaxations associated�with the different bridging anion coordinated to T(l) thus has additional arrangements of charges has adversely affected the incident bond-valence from this local arrangement, calculations. and will cause equal occupancy of the A(m) and A(2) It is difficult to reconcile the (e xactly) equal parti­ positions. This arrangement may propagate along the tioning of Na between the A(2) and A(m) sites with the chain of A cavities parallel to the c axis to form an intermediate (i.e., non-end-member) composition of ordered arrangement, but there is no way that this the crystal. In fact, it seems reasonable to conclude arrangement can be propagated to adjacent chains of that the ordering must be fairly independent of small A cavities, and thus long-range C2/m symmetry with changes in bulk composition in this particular case. the usual cell of amphibole is preserved. The key feature here is the recognition that although The argument advanced above for equal occupancy

FIG. 3. The A-site cavity and surrounding anions viewed down [010]. The T(l)' and T(l)" tetrahedra formtwo sets that are notrelated by the point sy=etryat the A position;a single T(l) tetrahedron has different relationships to the central A-position in each cavity. The broken lines show the limits of each A cavity. A-SITE DISORDER IN FLUOR-EDENITE 29

of the A(m) and A(2) positions is general and suggests CRoMER, D.T. & LmERMAN, D. (1970): Relativistic calcula­ that such a configuration should be the usual case in tion of anomalous scattering factors for X rays. J. Chern. Phys. 53, 1891-1898. amphiboles. However, the experimental sit�ation is less clear, as the assignment ofA-site populations is -- MANN, B. (1968): commonly complicated by the presenc� of :K,,.and the & J. X-ray scattering factors com­ puted from numerical Hartree-Fock wave functions. argument may need to. be modified if other orderini Acta. Crystallogr.A24, 321-324.' schemes [e.g., AI at M(2), Na at M(4), OH at 0(3)] also are present; these factors are··currently being DOCKA, J.A., POST, J.E., BISH, D.L. & BURNHAM, C.W. et al. examined in detail by Oberti (work in progress). (1987): Positional disorder of the A-site cations in C2Jm amphiboles. Model energy calculations and probability ' ' , · CONCLUSIONS studies. Am.Mineral. 72, 949-958, c, ;:}' 1, The compositional results suggest that the devia- GmBs, G.V. (1966): Untitled article. InAGI Short Course tion of amphibole composition from nominal in the Lecture Notes on Chain Silicates, 1-23. fluor-edenite system is a function of the temperature of crystallization. -- & PREwrrr, C.T. (1968): Amphibole cation site disor­ 2. Tetrahedrally coordinated AI is ordered at T(l) in der. Int. Mineral. Assoc., Proc., Fifth Gen. Meet. this synthetic fluor-edenite. (Cambridge, 1966). (abstr.). 3. Octahedrally coordinated AI is ordered at M(2). 4. ANa is equally partitioned between the A(m) and GRAHAM, C.M. & NAVROTSKY, A. (1986): Thermochemistry A(2) sites in this synthetic fluor-edenite. of the tremolite - edenite amphiboles using ana­ 5. The equal occupancy of theA(m) andA(2) sites by logues, and applications to amphibole - plagioclase - quartz equilibria, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 93, 18-32. Na can be explained on the basis of local bond­ valence requirements of the anions coordinating the GREENWOOD, H .J. (1979): Thermodynamic properties of T(l) site. edenite. Geol. Surv. Can., Pap. 79-lB, 365-370.

ACKNO�GEMENTS HAWTHORNE, F,C, (1983): The crystal chemistry of the amphiboles. Can. Mineral. 21, 173-480. We thank Luciano Ungaretti and an anonymous

reviewer for comments that materially improved this __ & GRUNDY, H.D. (1972): Positional disorder in the paper. Financial support was provided by the Natural A-site of clino-amphiboles. Nature Phys. Sci. 235, 72-73. Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

via a Post-graduate Fellowship to PCB and Operating, -- & __ (1973a): The crystal chemistry of the amphi­ Equipment and Infrastructure Grants to FCH. boles. I. Refinement of the crystal structure of ferro­ tschermakite. Mineral. Mag. 39, 36-48.

REFERENCES -- & __ (1973b) : Thecrysta l chemistry of the amphi­ boles. II. Refinement of the crystal stmcture of oxy-kaer­ BoCCHIO, R., UNGAREITI, L. & Rossi, G. (1978): Crystal sutite. Mineral. Mag. 39, 390-400. chemical study of eclogitic amphiboles from Alpe Arami, Lepontine Alps, southern Switzerland. Soc. !tal. Mineral. -- & __ (1977): The crystal chemistry of the amphi­ Petrol. Rend. 34, 453-470. boles. ill. Refmement of the crystal stmcture of a sub­ silicic hastingsite.Mineral. Mag. 41, 43-50.

BROWN, I.D. (1981): The bond-valence method: an empirical -- & -- (1978): The crystal chemistry of the amphi­ approach to chemical stmcture and bonding. In Stmcture boles. VII. The crystal stmcture and site chemistry of and Bonding in Crystals II (M. O'Keeffe & A. potassian ferri-tatamite. Can. Mineral. 16; 53-62. Navrotsky, eds.). Academic Press, New York (1-30).

HERITSCH, H. (1955): Bemerkungen zurBchreibung der SHANNON, -- & R.D. (1973): Empirical bond-strenth­ Tschermak:S A29, kristallchemischen Formel der Hornblende. bond-length curves for oxides. Acta Crystallogr. Mineral. Petro gr. Mitt. 5, 242-245. 266-282.

HINRICHSEN, T. & SCH0RMANN, K. (1977): Experimental CAMERON, M. Gmas, G.V. & (1973): The crystal stmcture investigations on the Na/K substitution in edenites and and bonding of fluor-tremolite: a comparison with pargasites. Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh. 130, 12-18. hydroxyl ttemolite.Am. Mineral. 58, 879-888. NA, K.C., McCAULEY, M.L., CRISP, J.A. & ERNST, W.G. -----, SUENO, S., PAPIKE, J.J. & l'REwrrr, C.T. (1983): High (1986): Phase relations to 3 kbar in the systems edenite + temperature crystal chemistry of K and Na fluor­ H20 and edenite + excess quartz + H20. Lithos 19, richterites.Am. Mineral. 68, 924-943. 153-163. 30 THE CANADIAN MINERALOGIST

OBERT!, R., UNGARE'ITI, L., CANNILLO, E. & HAWTHORNE, UNGARE'ITI, L. (1980): Recent developments in X-ray single F.C. (1992): Thebehaviour of Ti in amphiboles. I. Four­ crystal diffractometry applied to the crystal-chemical and six-coordinated Ti in richterite. Eur. J. Mineral. 4, study of amphiboles. God. Jugosl. Cent. Kristalogr. 15, 425-439. 29-65.

PAPIKE, J.J., Ross, M. & CLARK, J.R. (1969): Crystal­ -----. SMITH, D.C. & Rossr, G. (1981): Crystal-chemistry chemical characterization of clinoamphiboles based on by X-ray structure refinement and electron microprobe five new structure refinements.Mineral. Soc. Am., Spec. analysis of a series of sodic--calcic to alkali amphiboles Pap. 2, 117-136. from the Nyoo pod, Norway. BulL MineraL 104, 400-412. PREWITT, C.T. (1963): Crystal structures of two synthetic amphiboles. Geol. Soc. Am., Spec. Pap. 76, 132-133 WIDMARK, E.T. (1974): An edenite-forming reaction: (abstr.). hydrothermal experiments. Neues Jahrb. Mineral., Monatsh., 323-329. RAUDSEPP, M., 'fuRNOCK, A.C. & HAWTHORNE, F.C. (1991): Amphibole synthesis at low pressure: what grows and what doesn't. Eur. J. Mineral. 3, 983-1004.

SHANNON, R.D. (1976): Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and Received April 24, 1992, revised manuscript accepted April chalcogenides.Acta Crystallogr.A32, 751-767. 27,1993.