ACCESS A BROADER MARKET PERSPECTIVE ELECTION OUTCOMES YOU’RE NOT WATCHING BY DANIEL TENENGAUZER AND JOHN VELIS HIGHLY DIVIDED ELECTORATE AND WIDE POLICY DIVERSION between Republicans/Democrats, as well as within the Democrats themselves MARKETS ARE PRICING IN A TRUMP OR BIDEN WIN, but Biden may not get the nomination easily or early enough POSSIBILITY OF A BROKERED CONVENTION IN JULY if no Democrat has sufficient delegates THE EARLY PRIMARIES ARE KEY: first few races in the past have predicted the ultimate winner The next administration of either party could be A SOURCE OF POLICY RISK Divided government is NO GUARANTEE OF MARKET- FRIENDLY POLICIES COVER ILLUSTRATION: ROB DOBI INVESTOR CONFIDENCE IS HIGH AHEAD OF THIS NOVEMBER’S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. BUT WITH A HIGHLY DIVIDED ELECTORATE AND PLENTY OF ROOM FOR AN UPSET, MARKETS SHOULD BE WARY OF COMPLACENCY BY DANIEL TENENGAUZER AND JOHN VELIS, BNY MELLON MARKETS ith the 2020 US These moves reflect solid US funda- Many of the Democratic policy plans primary election mentals, particularly compared with are meant to help address the income season soon upon the rest of the world; an elongation of gap and Trump as well is more populist W us, investors are the US economic recovery, in part due than previous Republican presidents. faced with potentially market-moving to Trump’s corporate tax cuts; and a This sets up the potential for a larger outcomes in the next 12 months. rebooted and accelerated US labor US deficit, the fallout from which could One thing is clear: despite Donald market. affect market confidence. Trump’s atypical governing and com- So how should investors approach munication style over the past three the upcoming election season? The WHAT’S PRICED IN? years, his policies — in conjunction with market reflects a relatively sanguine The Democratic primary season begins successive rate cuts over the past year view of things. Yet the policy impli- Feb. 3 with the Iowa caucuses and con- — were market friendly. Rollercoaster cations of a win on either side are tinues in weekly succession thereafter. headlines aside, the market has exhib- even more dramatic than they have Helpfully, the economic backdrop is ited a fundamental resilience. been in previous years. The country solid. Despite a manufacturing slow- Total returns from the S&P500 were is also highly divided politically and down in the US — and an even more 31.5% last year, even with all the concern the various policy proposals from acute slump globally — the US con- over a looming recession, yield-curve presidential hopefuls reflect that fact. sumer, constituting 70% of GDP, con- inversion, and mounting trade-war wor- Furthermore, there is deep anger tinues to power the US economy. ries. From Election Day on November within the country at the growth of Related to this, there has been a pos- 8, 2016 through year-end 2019, the income inequality since the 2007- itive wealth effect created by the fact S&P500 had a total return of 60.8%. 2009 global financial crisis. that US households are more exposed There may be more risk to the markets in the next few months than is currently priced in... Yet the policy implications of a win on either side are even more dramatic than they have been in previous years. to equities than they have been since quarters, 73%, describe the economy as he is seen within the Democratic voting the late 1990s (see chart 1). either excellent or good, while only a population as most capable of directing The risk of volatility this year, how- quarter, 25%, say not so good or poor.” foreign policy and handling interna- ever, is heightened because of the very While there are limits to polling data, tional crises, according to a recent different proposals and policy prefer- a swing state CNN poll in December Emerson College poll. ences between the Democrats and the 2019 highlighted this favorable showing Biden also may benefit from being Republicans. by Trump. The polling across Arizona, able to stay in Iowa, along with The market is currently pricing Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Buttigieg, as the senators in the race in more of the same — essentially a Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin suggests — Klobuchar, Sanders and Warren — business-friendly administration and that, in this election, Trump beats must head back to Washington for the Republican control of the Senate. every candidate except for Biden, Trump impeachment trial. In practical terms, that means a where he falls short by 1-2% or is tied. Finally, if there is any question about second Trump administration or a In Iowa, Trump beats every candi- whether the stock market even cares more centrist Democrat in a Biden or date including Pete Buttigieg, the local about who sits in the White House, Bloomberg vein. favorite. The same CNN poll showed look no further than the performance So what do we know? The betting a declining favorability among the of healthcare stocks in 2019. Healthcare markets reflect that Trump is pre- Democratic candidates across the stocks last year traded in negative cor- dicted to beat all of the top four pri- board. The President appears to be relation to Warren’s odds of winning mary challengers in a general election headed into 2020 with an improving the Democratic nomination. this November (see chart 2). electability profile. As Warren rose in the polling during Further, the health of the economy On the Democratic side, the bet- the summer, the entire sector sold off — is a key factor in the likelihood of any ting markets show Biden beating even during a risk-off market, which is presidential reelection and recent all the other challengers within the typically when healthcare outperforms polling has shown an inflection point Democratic camp on a national basis (see chart 5). The reacceleration of in America’s confidence about the (see chart 4). In the interim there will healthcare stocks in the fourth quarter economy. be Trump plot twists but the bigger risk tells us that the market is less worried For Trump perhaps more so than his for markets is a centrist not getting the about a Warren presidency and the predecessors, equity markets see the Democratic nomination after all. implied impact on the private health economy as the key issue for his reelec- In particular, it looks like Biden and insurance industry. tion. According to December 2019’s Sanders have been direct beneficiaries Therefore, at first blush, it seems Quinnipiac University poll (see chart of Warren’s loss of momentum after the that the market is on a sound footing 3): “Registered voters are feeling more details of her “Medicare for all plan” with the expectation that either Trump positive about the economy than at any emerged in the fall. Biden gets further or Biden will win the 2020 election. time in the last 18 years, as nearly three strength from the recent Iran crisis as Compared to Trump, Biden is likely to CHART 1 HOME RUN US households are more exposed to equities than they have been since the late 1990s 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% of Total Financial Assets 10% US Household Stock Ownership as % 5% 0% 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 SOURCE: FactSet Data as of Q3, 2019 CHART 2 LEADING THE PACK Betting odds favor Trump to win the 2020 election this November Trump 60 Biden 50 Warren 50 Sanders 40 Buttigieg 30 22 20 21 Odds of Winning 6 10 5 0 Oct - 19 Oct - 19 Nov - 19 Nov - 19 Nov - 19 Nov - 19 Nov - 19 Dec - 19 Dec - 19 Dec - 19 Dec - 19 Jan - 20 Jan - 20 SOURCE: Predictit Data as of January 10, 2020 CHART 3 SANGUINE MOOD Registered voters are more bullish about the US economy than at any time in the last 18 years 80 71 73 70 70 67 70 65 64 61 61 69 59 60 Excellent/Good 50 Not Good/Poor 39 37 36 40 35 35 33 30 28 28 28 positive about US economy 30 Percent of respondents feeling 25 20 8/18 10/18 12/18 2/19 4/19 6/19 8/19 10/19 12/19 SOURCE: Quinnipiac University Data as of December 2019 be easier for US allies, create less ten- party, because it brings them clarity. Democratic candidates’ economic sion with China, and ultimately prove They tend to sell off when it looks like plans have major and mostly negative to be more business-friendly than the the opposing party is about to take the implications for the profitability of the other leaders of the Democratic camp. White House and also tend to perform corporate sector, in our view. But this confidence may prove mis- better in the following year when the The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 placed. There may be more risk to the incumbent party retains the White decreased the US corporate tax rate markets in the next few months than is House, according to Strategas. from 35% to 21%, making the US corpo- currently priced in. Ultimately though, markets trade rate tax rate among the lowest across on the prospects for the US economy industrialized economies. This resulted WHY DO MARKETS CARE? and specifically for US corporate sector in increased earnings, increased Why would the market really care profitability. As long as the economy, cash flow, increased dividends and about who sits in the White House? the labor markets and the corporate increased stock buybacks over the last After all, they have over time become sector are growing, the market will two years.
“The Return of the Brokered Convention? Democratic Party Rules and Presidential Nominations.”
“The Return of the Brokered Convention? Democratic Party Rules and Presidential Nominations.” By Rick Farmer State of the Parties 2009 October 15-16 Akron OH Front loading, proportional representation and super delegates are changing the dynamic of the Democratic presidential nomination. Since 1976 capturing the early momentum was the key ingredient to winning. Barack Obama’s nomination in 2008 demonstrates how these three forces are converging to re-write the campaign playbook. Front loading created a 2008 Super Tuesday that approached national primary day status. Proportional delegate allocations kept the race close when another system might have put the delegate count out of reach; and with a different result. Super delegates made the final decision. The 2008 Democratic presidential contests produced, in effect, a brokered convention. Without reform, many more brokered conventions appear to be in their future. Below is a discussion of how the reforms of the 1970s and 80s combine to produce this perfect storm. Then, the 2008 campaign illustrates the effects. The major reform proposals are examined. Finally some conclusions are drawn. Reforms of the 1970s and 80s American political parties grant their nomination to a single candidate at a national convention. Both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party nominations can be won with a simple majority of the delegates. Delegates are pledged through a series of caucuses and primaries. Both parties are following similar calendars but Republican Party rules result in a different type of contest than Democratic Party rules. Parties have met in quadrennial national conventions for the purpose of selecting a presidential nominee since 1832.
CLOSER to NOMINATION ELECTIONS Marchhas Passedand Thereare Only Ahandful of Voting Days Left Untilbothpolitical Partiesholdtheir Conventions
8A » Sunday, March 27,2016 » KITSAPSUN AJOURNAL MEDIAGROUP PROJECT CLOSER TO NOMINATION ELECTIONS Marchhas passedand thereare only ahandful of voting days left untilbothpolitical partiesholdtheir conventions. HillaryClinton 2016 andDonaldTrump areleading in thedelegatecounts, butthatstill does notmeantheyhaveaneasyroadtotheir respective party nominations. When delegate totals arethisclose,anythingcan happen at thenationalconventions this summer. Millions of people have votedinprimariesand at caucuses duringthe first fewmonthsthisyear. Theirvotes arenow in thehands of just afew thousand people. MEETTT THHEE DELEGATES The modern presidential nominationprocess —linking avotecastfor acandidate to the allocation of adelegateatthe convention level—was born outofalaw passed in 1910 in Oregon.In2016, 35 U.S. jurisdictionshaveorwillholdprimary elections, 13 have or will hold caucuses andeight have some combinationofthose. With rulesvarying from partytoparty andstate to state, theprocess of selectingapresidentialcandidate is alot more complicatedthanjustpicking someoneinthe ballot booth. DEMOCRATS REPUBLICANS Thereare twotypes of Members ooff theeD Deemmooccraratic Republicanshs h avete twwoo typesos off andahd a hyybbrriidds system. SSttaatteess set delegatesonthe Democratic National CoCommmmiitttteeee,, Congress, convention delegates: bound thepe peerrcceenntatage ththrreesshhoolldd side: pledgeddelegates and statege goovevernorsas anndd delegatesand unbound aac caannddiiddaattee must rreeaacchh unpledged superdelegates. distinguished paparrttyyo
Six Months to Go: Where the Presidential Contest Stands As the General Election Begins
May 10, 2012 Six Months To Go: Where the Presidential Contest Stands as the General Election Begins William A. Galston Table of Contents Summary 1 Where We Are Now and How We Got There 1 The Mood of the Country 3 The Issues 5 Ideology 7 What Kind of Election Will 2012 Be? 9 Referendum or Choice? 9 Persuasion or Mobilization? 13 It’s the Electoral College, Stupid 16 Conclusion: The Known Unknowns 22 Endnotes 23 SUMMARY arack Obama’s standing with the American people hit bottom in the late Bsummer and early fall of 2011. Since then, the president has recovered the political ground he lost during the debt ceiling fiasco and now enjoys a narrow edge over Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee. The standard political and economic indicators suggest that the 2012 election will be close. And the historic level of partisan polarization ensures that it will be hard-fought and divisive. William A. Galston is the Ezra K. Zilkha Since Vietnam and the Iranian hostage crisis, Republicans have effectively used the Chair in Governance issue of national security against Democrats. Barring unforeseen events, Romney Studies and senior will not be able to do so this year. Nor will a focus on hot-button social issues yield fellow at Brookings. significant gains for the challenger. Instead, to an extent that Americans have not seen for at least two decades, the election of 2012 will revolve around a single defining issue—the condition of the economy. In 2008, Barack Obama defeated John McCain in large measure because the people saw him as more able to manage the economy at a moment of frightening crisis.
{Download PDF} Who Will Be the Next President? a Guide to The
WHO WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT? A GUIDE TO THE U. S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION SYSTEM 2ND EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Alexander S Belenky | 9783319446950 | | | | | Who Will Be the Next President? A Guide to the U. S. Presidential Election System 2nd edition PDF Book Howie Hawkins April 19, Retrieved July 27, It could even be worse than the Hayes-Tilden election of , which was settled two days before the inauguration. Unpledged delegates don't. Modern history portal Politics portal United States portal. Senator from Delaware — Born November 20, October 4, FOX Attorneys controversies short tenures Dismissals U. The much more likely scenario, however, is that partisan politics will drive decisions in each state—and quite possibly dueling decisions in some states. In most states, the governor and the state legislature conduct the redistricting although some states have redistricting commissions. Retrieved April 14, Retrieved October 22, Former Massachusetts governor Bill Weld became Trump's first major challenger in the Republican primaries following an announcement on April 15, They'll get you the answer or let you know where to find it. Tilt D flip. Retrieved May 4, September 23, Accepted 3rd party nomination April 23, , votes. Retrieved November 14, Who Will Be the Next President? A Guide to the U. S. Presidential Election System 2nd edition Writer In 48 states and Washington, D. Retrieved July 27, The law continues the use of the congressional district method for the allocation of electors, as Maine and Nebraska have used in recent elections. W: April 5, votes 0. Retrieved December 6, This led to the concern that Biden may have contracted the virus from Trump; however, Biden tested negative.
How to Win the Democratic Nomination, and Why It Could Get Complicated - the New York Times 27/02/2020 14 34
How to Win the Democratic Nomination, and Why It Could Get Complicated - The New York Times 27/02/2020 1434 https://nyti.ms/37JW1OY How to Win the Democratic Nomination, and Why It Could Get Complicated Bernie Sanders says winning a plurality of delegates is good enough for the nomination. His rivals say a majority is needed. What does that mean? And why are superdelegates coming up again? By Matt Stevens Feb. 22, 2020 The last question at Wednesday night’s Democratic debate covered much wonkier territory than the fiery exchanges that preceded it. But it exposed a rift over what could become an extremely relevant topic: how the party’s presidential nominee should be chosen. “There’s a very good chance none of you are going to have enough delegates to the Democratic National Convention to clinch this nomination,” the moderator Chuck Todd told the candidates. “Should the person with the most delegates at the end of this primary season be the nominee even if they are short of a majority?” Every four years, pundits imagine such a scenario. But with eight Democrats still in the 2020 race, several of whom could split the available delegates, the premise may be more than theoretical this time around. Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont was the only candidate to agree that, in his words, “the person with the most votes” should get the nomination. This was not surprising given that he is currently the front-runner and — at least at the moment — appears to be the candidate most likely to win a plurality, but perhaps not a majority, of pledged delegates.