DOCSLIB.ORG

Russia and the Ukraine Affair

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Russia and the Ukraine Affair Too Few Facts, Too Much Fiction Third Age Learning – York Region Aurora Cultural Centre 21 September 2015 POPULATION OF UKRAINE, 2007 CENSUS Total — 45.49 million Ethnic Ukrainian 77% (37 m) Ethnic Russian 17.3 % (8.3 m) (others: Romanian, Moldova, Belarus, Hungarian, Tatar, Jewish, etc.) Languages spoken at home: Ukrainian 67% Russian 30% Donetsk Oblast (No. 1) 4.4 million Luhansk Oblast (No 7) 2.3 million Crimea 2.3 million 58.3% Russian; 24% Ukrainian; 12% Tatar Native Language in Crimea: 77% Russian; 11% Tatar; 10% Ukrainian Native Russian Speakers in Ukraine. Survey conducted by Kyiv-based Razumkov Think Tank, 2011, Kyiv-Post War Dead & Refugees Ukrainians killing Ukrainians • DEAD — Euromaidan protests — 110-125 (end of Feb 2014) • Crimea — 6 (end of March 2014) • Odessa — Trade Union Bldg massacre (2 May 2014) – 48 • Donbass— official 7,000 (end of Aug 2015) – 67% civilian • Unofficial — perhaps 50,000 • Missing — 2,000 • REFUGEES — 1.4 million – majority to Russia • — 430,000 official applications for refugee status in RF • — 122,000 applied for permanent residency by June • — Tens of thousands unofficial & hope to return to Ukr • INJURED — many, many more! Ukrainian Presidential Elections 2010 1st round Viktor Yanukovych - 35.32% Julia Tymoshenko 25.05% Viktor Yushchenko – 5.5% (5th) 7 others (turnout 67%) 2nd round Yanukovych 48.95 Tymoshenko 45.47 1.2% invalid 4.45 ‘Against all’ (turnout 69%) Verkhovna Rada(Parliamentary) Elections 2012 450 seats; 50% party lists/ 50% simple-majority; 5% election threshold Party of Regions- 185 seats (30.4%) (6.1 m) Batkivshchyna (Fatherland)- 101 (25.5%) (5.2 m) UDAR- 40 (14%) (2.8 m) *Svoboda (Freedom)- 37 (10.4%) (2.3 m) Communist- 32 (13.8%) (2.7 m) * “racist, xenophobic, anti-Semitic” PACE, 2012 (no coalition resolution) * “neo-Nazi” – World Jewish Congress, 2013 The Battle is Joined Economic Choices — November 2013 A) EU Association – no tariffs on EU goods; tariffs remain on Ukrainian goods; Must reform banking & taxations, set EU standards; no subsidies; market prices on domestic use of gas; end corruption; end free trade with RF B) Customs Union (RF, Kazakhstan, Belarus; Armenia, etc) Broader free trade (already had free trade with RF & CIS) $15 Billion bailout 30% discount on gas price Yanukovych chooses B 31 November 2013 1) Demonstrators on Maidan Nezalezhnosti [Independence Square] - seize buildings (eventually 9 govt. bldgs occupied); set up barricades; closed centre of capital city for 2.5 months (!!) 2) 18 Feb 2014 — violence 26-100 killed 3) 21 Feb 2014 — TRUCE & DEAL 1) Yanukovych to stay in office; but early election 2) Both sides step back 3) Opposition to form govt of “national unity” - Brawl in parliament; Euromaidans rejects (cleared out only in September)- Yarosh (Rt. Sek.) called for armed resurrection 4) 22 Feb 2014 — Yanukovych flees to Kharkiv Coup d’état – 23 February 2014 • Interim Government 23 February 2014 – No “Government of National Unity” – Batkishchyna (Yatsenyuk) – *Svoboda • Legislation: 1) ban language laws • 2) No federalization • 3) Join NATO • 4) Lustration Law (1 March) • 24 February – general Uprising in eastern Ukraine • (prior to any Russian action in Crimea) • *Political arm of Right Sector (Praviy Sektor) & Azov Battalion Crimean Parliamentary Elections 2010 100% opposed to joining NATO • Party of Regions 80 • Communist Party 5 • Tatar Party 5 • Soyuz 3 • Russian Unity (Aksyonov) 3 • Strong Ukraine 2 • Batkivshchyna 0 (2.6%) • Svoboda 0 (0.2%) • Population of Crimea 2.2 million Separatism is Crimea 1994 • “Separatist Winning Crimea Presidency” The New York Times, 31 January 1994 • “A separatist candidate who wants Crimea to leave Ukraine and integrate with Russia won more than 70 percent of the vote today in run-off presidential elections, . .” Crimea “annexation” or “reunification’? 1 Post- coup d’ état 27 Feb 2014 - RF forces seize Black Sea Naval Base at Sevastopol 1 Mar - Masked troops seize govt buildings in Crimea - Russian flags pop up everywhere in Crimea - Aksyonov named PM - announces referendum - RF takes over Crimea without firing a shot 2 Mar – Ukr forces (e.g. Ukr Chief of Navy Staff) in Crimea defect, or turn weapons over to rebels. Crimea “annexation” or “reunification’? 2 6 Mar 2014 – Crimea parliament secedes from Ukraine (had done so in 1992 & 94, failed) 7 Mar - Sevastopol City Council votes to join Russia 11 Mar – Crimea Parliament proclaims official independence from Ukraine (cites Kosovo precedent) 16 Mar – Referendum in Crimea: a) join Russia or b) revert to Const. of 1992 -- 80% turnout; 92% say ‘yes’ to “a” [no foreign monitors allowed] The West accuses Russia of meddling BUT 5 Dec 2013 — John Baird in Kyiv offering help to EuroMaidans 9 Dec 2013 — Joe Biden (Hunter-Burisma) calls Yanukovych, tells him to join EU if he wants US financial aid 15-16 Dec 2013 — McCain in Kyiv offering help to Maidans 10 & 16 Dec 2013— US’s Victoria Nuland & EU’s Catherine Ashton hand out bread to Maidans in Kyiv & offer support 4 Feb 2014 — Nuland telephone recording tells US Amb. Pyatt that US wants Yatsenyuk to take over Ukr Govt - adds ‘Fuck the EU’ when Pyatt says EU won’t like it. 12-13 April 2014 – head of CIA Brennan in Kyiv (secretly) 22 April 2014 - Joe Biden back in Kyiv promises financial aid 5 Feb 2015 –Obama boasts on TV that “we brokered a transition government in Ukraine” – oops! 10 Feb 2015 PACE Commissioner admits threatening Ukr in Nov- Dec 2013- told - PM Azarov that if he didn’t sign the accord with EU then it would be signed by “another government.” Meddling Anyone? US Assist Sec. of State Victoria Nuland, Tyahnybok (Svoboda), Klitschko (UDAR) Yatsenyuk (Fatherland) – 10 December 2013 Oleh Tyahnybok, head of Svoboda, a party labelled “racist, anti-Semitic and xenophobic” by European Parliament (2012) & “neo-Nazi” by World Jewish Congress (2013) John McCain in Kyiv with Svoboda leader, 15 December 2013 Don’t Go Away. Here’s Our Guy getting his photo-op, 4 December 2013 Foreigners Awarded Ukrainian Citizenship by Petroshenko and named to key government posts • Natalie Jaresko, American, Minister of Finance; CEO Horizon Capital; co-founder of ‘Open Ukraine’ with Yatsenyuk; former US State Dept. official (Dec 2014) • Alexander Kvitashvili, Georgian, Minister of Health (degrees from US universities) (Dec 2014) • Aivaras Abromavicius, Lithuanian, Minister of Economic Development. Doesn’t speak Ukrainian (Dec 2014) • Michael Saakashvili, former Pres. of Georgia; heads Ukr’s International Council on Reforms (with John McCain); named Gov. of Odessa Region June 2015. Wanted in Georgia for crimes • Giorgi Lortkipanidze, former head of Georgia’s MVD – now head of MVD in Odessa Region • — US “to pay staff of Odessa Administration and provide police from California to train Odessa police” – Saakashvili 5 July 2015 Former Georgian President Saakashvili Gets Ukrainian Citizenship; gives up Georgian citizenship Saakashvili & McCain head Poroshenko‘s International Advisory Committee What our Media wants to Believe 1:Yatsenyuk claims 10,000 Russian regular troops & 30,000 “Russian-led terrorists trained” by FSB & Russian army in Ukraine, 9 June 2015 What our Media wants to believe 2: Poroshenko on Russian Troops in Ukraine, Spring 2015 — 6 May Por. tells Ukr Security Council — 40,000 — 4 June: Por. tells Ukr Parliament — 9,000 — 12 June: Ukr. Defence Minister (Stepan Poltorak) told Ukr-NATO Council — 42,500 men and 558 tanks — 21 June: Ukr. Field Commander — 54,000 — 30 June: Por. tells Corriere della Sera (Rome): “Today, on Putin’s order, there are 200,000 men and an arsenal of armoured vehicles, sophisticated missile systems and anti-air arms amassed” in Ukraine. • [i.e. Nearly a quarter of Russia’s entire armed force!] What our Press tells us 2a: Poroshenko on Russian troops in Ukraine, August 2015 • 1 August 2015: Poroshenko tells interview for Libération (Paris), there are 9,000 Russian troops in Ukraine • BUT — no intelligence service or the OSCE has seen them — there has been NO DEMONSTRATED EVIDENCE OF LARGE-SCALE RUSSIAN TROOP PRESENCE IN UKRAINE — 25 Aug 2015: Delovaya zhizn reports compensation to families of 2,000 dead or injured Russian troops in “eastern Ukraine’ !! Wild Accusations 2. After a Swiss Red Cross Worker was killed in Donetsk by (illegal) cluster bomb • Ukrainian Foreign Ministry: “bandits and terrorists, in a barbaric way [did it]. He was killed as a result of shelling by terrorists’. • Mayor of Donetsk: “can they really believe we are shelling ourselves?” • Human Rights Watch after 2-week investigation: Ukrainian armed forces “launched cluster munitions attacks on Donetsk” and killed the Red Cross Worker (20 Oct 2014) • This NOT reported by our media Wild Accusations 6 Russia a greater threat to USA than ISIL • US General Joseph Dunford, new US Joint Chief of Staff: “Russia presents the greatest threat to our national security.” 9 July 2015 • US General Philip Breedlove, NATO Supreme Commander Europe, PBS interview, agrees with Dunford, 30 July 2015 • Gen. Ray Odierno, outgoing US Army Chief of staff, “Russia is the most dangerous” threat to the US, The Hill, 12 August 2015 • Ashton Carter, U.S. Defense Secretary, “Russia is a very, very significant threat” to US, Pentagon News Conference, 20 August 2015 Wild Accusations 7 10 August 2015 • O. Turchynov, head of Ukrainian Security Council: “In the occupied territories [of Donetsk and Luhansk regions] Russian special services are in the process of identifying targets with a high civilian concentration: kindergartens, schools, apartment buildings, infrastructure facilities, etc., scheming the execution of various scenarios of terrorist acts” — to attack and then blame Kyiv forces of crimes against humanity. • [printed in Voice of America, 10 August 2015] (Rtd.) Gen. Scales “the only way to turn tide [in Ukr] is start killing Russians . killing so many that Putin’s media can’t hide the fact .
Recommended publications
  • Access Full Issue

    Access Full Issue

    ISSN 2520-2073 (print) ISSN 2521-442X (online) TRAINING, LANGUAGE AND CULTURE ‘Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn’ ‒ Benjamin Franklin Vol. 4 Issue 4 2020 Issue DOI: 10.22363/2521-442X-2020-4-4 The quarterly journal published by Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) ISSN 2520-2073 (print) AIMS AND SCOPE TRAINING, LANGUAGE AND CULTURE ISSN 2521-442X (online) Training, Language and Culture (TLC) is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to promote and disseminate research spanning the spectrum of language and linguistics, education and culture studies with a special focus on professional communication and professional discourse. Editorial Board of A quarterly journal published by RUDN University Training, Language and Culture invites research-based articles, reviews and editorials covering issues of relevance for the scientific and professional communities. EDITORIAL BOARD Dr Elena N. Malyuga Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russian Federation FOCUS AREAS Barry Tomalin Glasgow Caledonian University London, London, UK Training, Language and Culture covers the following areas of scholarly interest: theoretical and practical perspectives in language and linguistics; Dr Michael McCarthy University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK culture studies; interpersonal and intercultural professional communication; language and culture teaching and training, including techniques and Dr Robert O’Dowd University of León, León, Spain technology, testing and assessment. Dr Elsa Huertas Barros University of Westminster, London, UK Dr Olga V. Aleksandrova Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation LICENSING Dr Lilia K. Raitskaya Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Moscow, Russian Federation All articles and book reviews published in Training, Language and Culture are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Li- Dr Alex Krouglov University College London, London, UK cense (CC BY 4.0).
  • The European and Russian Far Right As Political Actors: Comparative Approach

    The European and Russian Far Right As Political Actors: Comparative Approach

    Journal of Politics and Law; Vol. 12, No. 2; 2019 ISSN 1913-9047 E-ISSN 1913-9055 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The European and Russian Far Right as Political Actors: Comparative Approach Ivanova Ekaterina1, Kinyakin Andrey1 & Stepanov Sergey1 1 RUDN University, Russia Correspondence: Stepanov Sergey, RUDN University, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Received: March 5, 2019 Accepted: April 25, 2019 Online Published: May 30, 2019 doi:10.5539/jpl.v12n2p86 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v12n2p86 The article is prepared within the framework of Erasmus+ Jean Monnet Module "Transformation of Social and Political Values: the EU Practice" (575361-EPP-1-2016-1-RU-EPPJMO-MODULE, Erasmus+ Jean Monnet Actions) (2016-2019) Abstract The article is devoted to the comparative analysis of the far right (nationalist) as political actors in Russia and in Europe. Whereas the European far-right movements over the last years managed to achieve significant success turning into influential political forces as a result of surging popular support, in Russia the far-right organizations failed to become the fully-fledged political actors. This looks particularly surprising, given the historically deep-rooted nationalist tradition, which stems from the times Russian Empire. Before the 1917 revolution, the so-called «Black Hundred» was one of the major far-right organizations, exploiting nationalistic and anti-Semitic rhetoric, which had representation in the Russian parliament – The State Duma. During the most Soviet period all the far-right movements in Russia were suppressed, re-emerging in the late 1980s as rather vocal political force. But currently the majority of them are marginal groups, partly due to the harsh party regulation, partly due to the fact, that despite state-sponsored nationalism the position of Russian far right does not stand in-line with the position of Russian authorities, trying to suppress the Russian nationalists.
  • 7 Political Corruption in Ukraine

    7 Political Corruption in Ukraine

    NATIONAL SECURITY & DEFENCE π 7 (111) CONTENTS POLITICAL CORRUPTION IN UKRAINE: ACTORS, MANIFESTATIONS, 2009 PROBLEMS OF COUNTERING (Analytical Report) ................................................................................................... 2 Founded and published by: SECTION 1. POLITICAL CORRUPTION AS A PHENOMENON: APPROACHES TO DEFINITION ..................................................................3 SECTION 2. POLITICAL CORRUPTION IN UKRAINE: POTENTIAL ACTORS, AREAS, MANIFESTATIONS, TRENDS ...................................................................8 SECTION 3. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COUNTERING UKRAINIAN CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC & POLITICAL STUDIES POLITICAL CORRUPTION ......................................................................33 NAMED AFTER OLEXANDER RAZUMKOV SECTION 4. CONCLUSIONS AND PROPOSALS ......................................................... 40 ANNEX 1 FOREIGN ASSESSMENTS OF THE POLITICAL CORRUPTION Director General Anatoliy Rachok LEVEL IN UKRAINE (INTERNATIONAL CORRUPTION RATINGS) ............43 Editor-in-Chief Yevhen Shulha ANNEX 2 POLITICAL CORRUPTION: SPECIFICITY, SCALE AND WAYS Layout and design Oleksandr Shaptala OF COUNTERING IN EXPERT ASSESSMENTS ......................................44 Technical & computer support Volodymyr Kekuh ANNEX 3 POLITICAL CORRUPTION: SCALE AND WAYS OF COUNTERING IN PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS AND ASSESSMENTS ...................................49 This magazine is registered with the State Committee ARTICLE of Ukraine for Information Policy, POLITICAL
  • Cooperation of CE Countries in Response to Situation in Russian Federation and in Ukraine

    Cooperation of CE Countries in Response to Situation in Russian Federation and in Ukraine

    Cooperation o f C E c o u n t r i e s i n r e s p o n s e t o s i t u a t i o n i n Russian Federation and in Ukraine V4+ Cooperation of CE countries in response to situation in Russian Federation and in Ukraine P RAGUE STUDENT SUMMIT /XX/ V 4 + / I I I 1 Cooperation o f C E c o u n t r i e s i n r e s p o n s e t o s i t u a t i o n i n Russian Federation and in Ukraine Author: Vendula Kotyzová, Vojtěch Bahenský, Jakub Kufčák Imprimatur: Šimon Presser Graphics: Jan Hlaváček Model V4+ Published by Association for International Affairs for Prague Student Summit. © AMO 2015 Asociace pro mezinárodní otázky Žitná 27, 110 00 Praha 1 Tel./fax: +420 224 813 460, e-mail: [email protected] IČ: 65 99 95 33 www.amo.cz www.studentsummit.cz P RAGUE STUDENT SUMMIT /XX/ V 4 + / I I I 2 Cooperation o f C E c o u n t r i e s i n r e s p o n s e t o s i t u a t i o n i n Russian Federation and in Ukraine 1 Introduction The conflict in Ukraine that escalated into Russian annexation of Crimean peninsula influenced the whole world. Countries of Central and Eastern Europe are now living in uncertenity of what would happen next, if this apperent Russian expansion continued further.
  • International Crimes in Crimea

    International Crimes in Crimea

    International Crimes in Crimea: An Assessment of Two and a Half Years of Russian Occupation SEPTEMBER 2016 Contents I. Introduction 6 A. Executive summary 6 B. The authors 7 C. Sources of information and methodology of documentation 7 II. Factual Background 8 A. A brief history of the Crimean Peninsula 8 B. Euromaidan 12 C. The invasion of Crimea 15 D. Two and a half years of occupation and the war in Donbas 23 III. Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court 27 IV. Contextual elements of international crimes 28 A. War crimes 28 B. Crimes against humanity 34 V. Willful killing, murder and enforced disappearances 38 A. Overview 38 B. The law 38 C. Summary of the evidence 39 D. Documented cases 41 E. Analysis 45 F. Conclusion 45 VI. Torture and other forms of inhuman treatment 46 A. Overview 46 B. The law 46 C. Summary of the evidence 47 D. Documented cases of torture and other forms of inhuman treatment 50 E. Analysis 59 F. Conclusion 59 VII. Illegal detention 60 A. Overview 60 B. The law 60 C. Summary of the evidence 62 D. Documented cases of illegal detention 66 E. Analysis 87 F. Conclusion 87 VIII. Forced displacement 88 A. Overview 88 B. The law 88 C. Summary of evidence 90 D. Analysis 93 E. Conclusion 93 IX. Crimes against public, private and cultural property 94 A. Overview 94 B. The law 94 C. Summary of evidence 96 D. Documented cases 99 E. Analysis 110 F. Conclusion 110 X. Persecution and collective punishment 111 A. Overview 111 B.
  • Azov Phenomenon How Ukrai

    Azov Phenomenon How Ukrai

    INFORMATION GROUP ON CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON (IGCP) INFORMATION GROUP ON CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON (IGCP) Azov Phenomenon How Ukrainian Neo-Nazis Became Infl uential Political Force “IGCP Reports” (published since 2016) Head of the Project A.R. Dyukov. Issue 3. Editor M.A. Vilkov. Maltsev V. Azov Phenomenon How Ukrainian Neo-Nazis became Influential Political Force / Information Group on Crimes against the Person (IGCP). M.: “Istoricheskaya pamyat” Foundation, 2017. — 98 pages. There were the days when participants of right-wing and neo-Nazi groups in the Ukraine were marginal ones, being expelled to the edge of political and social life. Everything changed in 2014, during the so-called “Revolution of Dignity”. Ukrainian neo-Nazis gained money and weapon, they were given official status as Army, Police and Special Forces units, they got representatives in the Parliament. The history of “Azov” — notorious neo- Nazi detachment of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Ukraine — became an image of such transformation. “Azov” offsprings hold leading offices in Ukrainian Police, raise the youth in neo-Nazi ideology encirclement, effectively expand their representation on the Ukrainian political field and getting ready for the struggle for power. This report is devoted to the process of Ukrainian nationalists becoming influential political power. IGCP, 2017. Contents Preface ............................................................................7 Chapter 1. Street Militants...............................................11 Social-National Party of Ukraine .................................... 13 The Social-National Assembly ........................................ 25 Chapter 2. Neo-Nazis Get Armed ..................................... 41 Chapter 3: Forced March to Power ..................................69 Preface “Any man who has once acclaimed violence as his METHOD must inexorably choose false- hood as his PRINCIPLE.” A.I.
  • Political Trends & Dynamics

    Political Trends & Dynamics

    Briefing Political Trends & Dynamics The Far Right in the EU and the Western Balkans Volume 3 | 2020 POLITICAL TRENDS & DYNAMICS IN SOUTHEAST EUROPE A FES DIALOGUE SOUTHEAST EUROPE PROJECT Peace and stability initiatives represent a decades-long cornerstone of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung’s work in southeastern Europe. Recent events have only reaffirmed the centrality of Southeast European stability within the broader continental security paradigm. Both de- mocratization and socio-economic justice are intrinsic aspects of a larger progressive peace policy in the region, but so too are consistent threat assessments and efforts to prevent conflict before it erupts. Dialogue SOE aims to broaden the discourse on peace and stability in southeastern Europe and to counter the securitization of prevalent narratives by providing regular analysis that involves a comprehensive understanding of human security, including structural sources of conflict. The briefings cover fourteen countries in southeastern Europe: the seven post-Yugoslav countries and Albania, Greece, Turkey, Cyprus, Bulgaria, Romania, and Moldova. PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED • Civic Mobilizations • The Digital Frontier in • The European Project in the Western in Southeast Europe Southeast Europe Balkans: Crisis and Transition February / March 2017 February / March 2018 Volume 2/2019 • Regional Cooperation in • Religion and Secularism • Chinese Soft Power the Western Balkans in Southeast Europe in Southeast Europe April / Mai 2017 April / May 2018 Volume 3/2019 • NATO in Southeast Europe
  • Olena Semenyaka, the “First Lady” of Ukrainian Nationalism

    Olena Semenyaka, the “First Lady” of Ukrainian Nationalism

    Olena Semenyaka, The “First Lady” of Ukrainian Nationalism Adrien Nonjon Illiberalism Studies Program Working Papers, September 2020 For years, Ukrainian nationalist movements such as Svoboda or Pravyi Sektor were promoting an introverted, state-centered nationalism inherited from the early 1930s’ Ukrainian Nationalist Organization (Orhanizatsiia Ukrayins'kykh Natsionalistiv) and largely dominated by Western Ukrainian and Galician nationalist worldviews. The EuroMaidan revolution, Crimea’s annexation by Russia, and the war in Donbas changed the paradigm of Ukrainian nationalism, giving birth to the Azov movement. The Azov National Corps (Natsional’nyj korpus), led by Andriy Biletsky, was created on October 16, 2014, on the basis of the Azov regiment, now integrated into the Ukrainian National Guard. The Azov National Corps is now a nationalist party claiming around 10,000 members and deployed in Ukrainian society through various initiatives, such as patriotic training camps for children (Azovets) and militia groups (Natsional’ny druzhiny). Azov can be described as a neo- nationalism, in tune with current European far-right transformations: it refuses to be locked into old- fashioned myths obsessed with a colonial relationship to Russia, and it sees itself as outward-looking in that its intellectual framework goes beyond Ukraine’s territory, deliberately engaging pan- European strategies. Olena Semenyaka (b. 1987) is the female figurehead of the Azov movement: she has been the international secretary of the National Corps since 2018 (and de facto leader since the party’s very foundation in 2016) while leading the publishing house and metapolitical club Plomin (Flame). Gaining in visibility as the Azov regiment transformed into a multifaceted movement, Semenyaka has become a major nationalist theorist in Ukraine.
  • The Impact of Changes in Electoral Systems: a Comparative Analysis of the Local Election in Ukraine in 2006 and 2010

    The Impact of Changes in Electoral Systems: a Comparative Analysis of the Local Election in Ukraine in 2006 and 2010

    STUDIA VOL. 36 POLITOLOGICZNE STUDIA I ANALIZY Olena Yatsunska The impact of changes in electoral systems: a comparative analysis of the local election in Ukraine in 2006 and 2010 KEY WORDS: local government, local elections, proportional electoral system, majoritarian electoral system, mixed majoritarian-proportional electoral system, Ukraine STUDIA I ANALIZY Having gained independence in 1991 Ukraine, like most Central and East- ern European countries, faced the need for radical Constitutional reforms, with reorganization of local government figuring high in the agenda. Like other post-soviet countries, Ukraine had to decide on the starting point and like in the neighboring countries, democratic euphoria of the early 1990s got the upper hand: local authorities were elected on March 18, 1990, while the Law On Local People’s Deputies of Ukrainian SSR and Local Self-government was adopted by Verkhovna Rada of Ukrainian SSR on December 7, 1990. Ukrain- ian Researchers in the field of local government and its reforms concur with the opinion that the present dissatisfactory state of that institution was con- ditioned by the first steps made by Ukrainian Politicians at the beginning of the ‘transition’ period. Without clear perspective of reform, during more than 20 years of Independence, Ukrainian local government has abided dozens of laws, sometimes rather contradictory and has survived more than 10 stages of restructuring. Evolution of election legislation in Ukraine is demonstrated by Table 1. The table shows that since 1994 three electoral systems have been tested in Ukraine: 1, Majoritarian, 2, Proportional except elections to village and settlement councils and 3, ‘Mixed’ system (50% Majoritarian+50% Proportional).
  • Indrastra.Com-Putin Visiting Crimea to Celebrate Crimean Accession To

    Indrastra.Com-Putin Visiting Crimea to Celebrate Crimean Accession To

    Putin Visiting Crimea to Celebrate Crimean Accession to Russia indrastra.com/2019/03/Putin-Visit-to-Crimea-5th-Anniversary-Accession-005-03-2019-0045.html March 18, 2019 By IndraStra Global News Team Image Attribute: The file photo of Swallow's Nest, a decorative castle located at Gaspra, a small spa town between Yalta and Alupka, in the Crimean Peninsula (annexed by Russia in 2014) / Source: Pixabay.com On March 18, 2019, Russian President Vladimir Putin is set to travel to Crimea and visit cities of Sevastopol and Simferopol to mark the fifth anniversary of of Crimea’s reunification with Russia - the day Ukraine’s Black Sea peninsula became part of Russia. The Kremlin's press service issued a statement on March 17, 2019; "On March 18, 2019, Russian President Vladimir Putin will visit Crimea and Sevastopol" - marking five years since Crimea "rejoined" Russia. However, Kyiv and the West slammed the move as an "illegal" annexation, leading to sanctions against Russian individuals and entities. 1/4 During the visit, Putin will receive reports about the launch of the Balaklava and Tavria thermal power plants and participate in the unveiling ceremony of the Port electric substation in the city of Taman via videoconference. Both the power stations were at the center of an international scandal after German conglomerate Siemens said its power turbines had been installed there without its knowledge and in violation of EU sanctions banning the supply of energy technology to Crimea. In Moscow, city authorities are organizing a street festival a stone's throw from the Kremlin called "Crimean Spring" that hosts jazz concerts, cooking workshops, and a photography exhibition.
  • The Peninsula of Fear: Chronicle of Occupation and Violation of Human Rights in Crimea

    The Peninsula of Fear: Chronicle of Occupation and Violation of Human Rights in Crimea

    THE PENINSULA OF FEAR: CHRONICLE OF OCCUPATION AND VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN CRIMEA Kyiv 2016 УДК 341.223.1+342.7.03](477.75)’’2014/2016’’=111 ББК 67.9(4Укр-6Крм)412 Composite authors: Sergiy Zayets (Regional Center for Human Rights), Olexandra Matviychuk (Center for Civil Liberties), Tetiana Pechonchyk (Human Rights Information Center), Darya Svyrydova (Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union), Olga Skrypnyk (Crimean Human Rights Group). The publication contains photographs from public sources, o7 cial websites of the state authorities of Ukraine, the Russian Federation and the occupation authorities, Crimean Field Mission for Human Rights, Crimean Human Rights Group, the online edition Crimea.Realities / Radio Svoboda and other media, court cases materials. ‘The Peninsula of Fear : Chronicle of Occupation and Violation of Human Rights in Crimea’ / Under the general editorship of O. Skrypnyk and T. Pechonchyk. Second edition, revised and corrected. – Kyiv: KBC, 2016. – 136 p. ISBN 978-966-2403-11-4 This publication presents a summary of factual documentation of international law violation emanating from the occupation of the autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine) by the Russian Federation military forces as well as of the human rights violations during February 2014 – February 2016. The publication is intended for the representatives of human rights organizations, civil activists, diplomatic missions, state authorities, as well as educational and research institutions. УДК 341.223.1+342.7.03](477.75)’’2014/2016’’=111 ББК 67.9(4Укр-6Крм)412 ISBN 978-966-2403-11-4 © S. Zayets, O. Matviychuk, T. Pechonchyk, D. Svyrydova, O. Skrypnyk, 2016 Contents Introduction.
  • Career Break Or a New Career? Extremist Foreign Fighters in Ukraine

    Career Break Or a New Career? Extremist Foreign Fighters in Ukraine

    Career Break or a New Career? Extremist Foreign Fighters in Ukraine By Kacper Rekawek (@KacperRekawek) April 2020 Counter Extremism Project (CEP) Germany www.counterextremism.com I @FightExtremism CONTENTS: ABOUT CEP/ABOUT THE AUTHOR 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 5 SECTION I INTRODUCING FOREIGN FIGHTERS IN THE WAR IN UKRAINE 7 THE XRW FOREIGN FIGHTER: A WORLDVIEW 9 TALKING TO FOREIGN FIGHTERS: THEIR WORDS AND SYMBOLS 11 THE “UNHAPPY” FOREING FIGHTERS 13 CIVIL WAR? 15 SECTION II WHY THEY FIGHT 17 A CAREER BREAK OR NEW CAREER? 18 FOREIGN FIGHTERS WAR LOGISTICS 22 SECTION III FOREIGN FIGHTERS AS A THREAT? 25 TENTATIVE CONCLUSION: NEITHER A UKRAINIAN 29 NOR A WESTERN PROBLEM? ENDNOTES 31 Counter Extremism Project (CEP) 1 counterextremism.com About CEP The Counter Extremism Project (CEP) is a not-for-profit, non-partisan, international policy organization formed to combat the growing threat from extremist ideologies. Led by a renowned group of former world leaders and diplomats it combats extremism by pressuring financial and material support networks; countering the narrative of extremists and their online recruitment; and advocating for smart laws, policies, and regulations. About the author Kacper Rekawek, PhD is an affiliated researcher at CEP and a GLOBSEC associate fellow. Between 2016 and 2019 he led the latter’s national security program. Previously, he worked at the Polish Institute of International Affairs (PISM) and University of Social Sciences in Warsaw, Poland. He held Paul Wilkinson Memorial Fellowship at the Handa Centre