DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents TABLE OF 8 VOLUME 8: CONSULTATION .......................................... 1 8.1 The Master Plan’s Consultation Program ................................ 1 CONTENTS 8.1.1 Public and Agency Consultation ............................................................................................. 1 8.1.2 Consultation with Key Stakeholders ................................................................................... 2 8.1.3 First Nations Consultation ........................................................................................................... 2 APPENDICES APPENDIX 8-A CONSULTATION MATERIALS CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY WATER AND WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN WSP Project No. 121-23026-00 CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY Page i 8 VOLUME 8: CONSULTATION 8.1 THE MASTER PLAN’S CONSULTATION PROGRAM Consultation effort is an important aspect of the Municipal Class EA process for Master Planning. To meet the Class EA Phase 1 and 2 consultation requirements for the City of Greater Sudbury Water and Wastewater Master Plan, two informative sessions were completed to consult stakeholders, the public, government agencies, and other interested parties. Consultation ensured that necessary information regarding the study was made available to the required parties, to be reviewed and commented on, prior to any decision making. Appendix 8-A contains relevant documents from these consultation sessions (notices and presentations). The following sections detail the consultation efforts made throughout the CGS Water and Wastewater Master Planning process. 8.1.1 PUBLIC AND AGENCY CONSULTATION The Master Plan was carried out in conjunction with Approach 1 from the MEA Class EA process, whereby the study is conducted at a broad level of assessment and in which site-specific Class EA’s for all recommended Schedule B and Schedule C projects are to be completed in the future, closer to the time of the projects’ implementation. Additional studies and consultation efforts will be required prior to the implementation of all Schedule A+, B and C projects. Four key public consultation activities were undertaken throughout the course of the CGS Master Plan; 1 Notice of Project Commencement 2 Public Consultation Session (PCS) #1 3 PCS #2 4 Notice of Study Completion Any input received from interested parties throughout the the project’s undertaking, as well as the responses to the input is included in Appendix 8-A. PROJECT NOTICES Project Notices were issued in order to notify stakeholders, the public, and other agencies of the project status and to describe the general undertaking. Details relating to publically available information, as well as reference to the Municipal Class EA process and planned PCSs were included in the notices. WSP contacted each member of the Stakeholder Contact List (See Stakeholder Contact List subsection) by mail, and the City of Greater Sudbury addressed the public by including both notices in the public newspaper twice. PCS Notices were distributed two weeks prior to the session dates. PUBLIC CONSULTATION SESSIONS The two PCSs were developed and delivered in different communities within the CGS. The first PCS, held June 2nd and 3rd of 2014, was provided in the Valley as well as in Sudbury. The presentation outlined the problem statement, the Master Planning process, existing conditions, general alternative solutions, evaluation approach, and the project’s next steps. Interested stakeholders were encouraged to provide feedback though questionnaires available at the PCS as well as online; however, it was noted that there was little public participation at this consultation session. A mailing list was made available as well, to allow interested parties to sign up to be informed of project updates. The second PCS occurred in June of 2017, and took place in where at the South End Public Library. This session was held to convey information regarding the existing water and wastewater systems, a summary of the identified existing and future infrastructure deficiencies, a description of the alternative servicing solutions developed to address the infrastructure gaps, and a presentation of the recommendations regarding the preferred solutions for each of the water and wastewater systems in the CGS. Feedback forms were made available at the session. CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY WATER AND WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN WSP Project No. 121-23026-00 CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY Page 1 STAKEHOLDER CONTACT LIST A stakeholder contact list was developed throughout the Master Planning process to ensure all appropriate stakeholders were being consulted at key times during the project. The list comprises all stakeholders and their available contact information including company, address, phone number, and email address. Updates were made to reflect interested parties based on the PCS participation. Contacts include agencies such as the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Environment Canada, the Ministry of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation, and the Ministry of the Environment. The complete stakeholder contact list is included in Appendix 8-A. 8.1.2 CONSULTATION WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS Over the course of the Master Plan the City has undertaken several meetings with Vale to discuss the Water and Wastewater Servicing currently provided by Vale. The feedback from these discussions has been used as input into the evaluation of servicing alternatives and the determination of the final preferred servicing solutions. 8.1.3 FIRST NATIONS CONSULTATION To ensure all appropriate Métis and Aboriginal groups were being engaged throughout the Master Plan, federal and provincial websites including Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) and Aboriginal and Treaty Rights Information System (ATRIS), respectively, were consulted to develop a list of all Indigenous communities affected by the Master Plan. A report was then submitted to the Ministry of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation regarding the Study, in order to confirm that all necessary groups were included in the notifications list. Notices of PCSs were sent to all communities included on the list. WSP CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY WATER AND WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN Project No. 121-23026-00 Page 2 CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY APPENDIX 8-A CONSULTATION MATERIALS City of Greater Sudbury Water & Wastewater Master Plan Project Mailing List Updated: December 2016 FEDERAL AGENCIES Title First Name Last Name Title Company Name Address Line 1 Address Line 2 City Province Postal Code Country Phone Fax Email Address Ms. Julie Fontaine Fisheries & Oceans Canada – OCLA Northern District 1500 Paris Street, Unit 1 Sudbury ON P3E 3B8 CA Mr. Robert Dobos Manager Environment Canada – Ontario Region 867 Lakeshore Boulevard Burlington ON L7R 4A6 CA 905-336-4953 905-336-8901 [email protected] Mr. Barry Goodwinn Industry Canada 151 Yonge Street Toronto ON M5C 2W7 CA Mr. Jason Innis Environmental Analyst and Assessment Officer Fednor Regional Operations - Industry Canada 19 Lisgar Street, Suite 307 Sudbury ON P3E 3L4 CA 705-507-6952 705-671-0717 Mr. Paul Schafer Senior Advisor Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Place Bell Canada 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor Ottawa ON K1A 0H3 CA 613-948-1975 Environmental Assessment Coordinator Transport Canada, Ontario Region 4900 Yonge St, 4th Floor Toronto ON M2N 6A5 CA FIRST NATIONS AGENCIES / ABORIGINAL COMMUNITIES Ms. Heather Levecque Ministry of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation 160 Bloor Street East, 9th Floor Toronto ON M7A 2E6 CA Mr. Franklin Paibomsai Whitefish River First Nation P.O. Box A 46 Bay of Islands Road Birch Island ON P0P 1A0 CA 705-285-4335 705-285-4532 [email protected] Mr. Angus Toulouse Chief Executive Officer Northshore Tribal Council P.O. Box 28 473 Highway 17 W Cutler ON P0P 1B0 CA 705-844-2340 705-844-2563 [email protected] Chief Ted Roque Chief Wahnapitae First Nation P.O. Box 1119 259 Taighwenini Trail Road Capreol ON P0M 1H0 CA 705-858-0610 705-858-5570 [email protected] Sudbury Métis Council 260 Alder Street, Upstairs Sudbury ON P3C 5P4 CA 705-671-9855 Métis Nation of Ontario Head Office 500 Old St. Patrick Street, Unit 3 Ottawa ON K1N 9G4 CA 613-798-1488 613-722-4225 [email protected] Chief Edward (Steven) Miller Atikameksheng Anishnawbek 25 Reserve Road Naughton ON P0M 2M0 CA 705-692-3651 705-692-5010 [email protected] LOCAL AGENCIES Mr. Curtis Thompson City of Greater Sudbury, Infrastructure Services 200 Brady Street Sudbury ON P3A 5P3 CA Mr. Perry Sarvas Simon Lake Community Stewardship Group P.O. Box 511 Naughton ON P0M 2M0 CA Ms. Lyse-Anne Papineau Conseil Scolaire Catholique Du Nouvel Ontario 201, rue Jogues Sudbury ON P3C 5L7 CA Mr. Jody Cameron Sudbury Catholic District School Board 217 Niemi Road Lively ON P3Y 1G3 CA Mr. Gord Santalo Rainbow District School Board 69 Young Street Sudbury ON P3E 3G5 CA Ms. Linda Heron Vermilion River Stewardship 379 Ronka Rd. Worthington ON P0M 3H0 CA Ms. Judy Sewell Drinking Water Source Protection Coordinator Conservation Sudbury / Nickel District Conservation Authority 199 Larch Street Suite 401, 4th Floor Sudbury ON P3E 5P9 CA (705) 674-5249 (705) 674-7939 [email protected] Ms. Lesley Flowers Greater Sudbury Watershed Alliance 403 Flowers Road Whitefish ON P0M 3E0 CA 705-866-2312 [email protected] Ms. Jennifer Babin-Fenske Coordinator of Earthcare Sudbury Initiatives City of Greater Sudbury 200 Brady Street Tom Davies Square Sudbury ON P3A 5P3 CA 705-647-4455 x 4398 jennifer.babin‐[email protected] Ms. Paddy Buchanan City of Greater Sudbury
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notice of Submission of Terms of Reference
    NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF TERMS OF REFERENCE This notification is to announce the submission of the Cliffs Chromite Project Documents Available for Review Terms of Reference to the Ministry of the Environment (MOE). Please read You may inspect the proposed Terms of Reference during below for further information about the Project. normal business hours at the following locations, please check with your nearest location for their specific hours of operation: Cliffs Natural Resources Ministry of the Environment Valley East Public Library Inc. (Cliffs) is undergoing a Approvals Branch 4100 Elmview Drive, provincial and federal Floor 12A, 2 St. Clair Ave West, Hanmer, P3P 1J7 Toronto, M4V 1L5 Environmental Assessment Capreol Citizen Service (EA) for the Cliffs Ministry of the Environment Centre & Library Thunder Bay District Office 1-9 Morin Street, Chromite Project. The Suite 331, 435 James Street South, Capreol, P0M 1H0 Thunder Bay, P7E 6S7 EA will assess the Brodie Resource Library following four components Ministry of the Environment 216 South Brodie Street, of the Project: Sudbury District Office Thunder Bay, P7E 1C2 Suite 1201, 199 Larch Street, Sudbury , P3E 5P9 Waverley Resource Library 1) The Mine Site, located 285 Red River Road, near McFaulds Lake; Ministry of the Environment Thunder Bay, P7B 1A9 Timmins District Office 2) An Ore Processing Ontario Govt. Complex Elsie Dugard Centennial Library Facility, co-located at Hwy 101 East, South Porcupine, P0N 1H0 405 Second Street West, the Mine Site; Geraldton, P0T 1M0 Greenstone Municipal
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Telecommunications Tower Report
    Presented To: Planning Committee Request for Decision Presented: Monday, May 26, 2014 Report Date Tuesday, May 13, 2014 Proposed Telecommunications Tower, PIN 73504-2043, Parcel 24564 S.E.S., Part of Lot 5, Type: Routine Management Concession 3, Hanmer Township, (4980 Municipal Reports Road 80), City of Greater Sudbury, Rogers Communications Inc Recommendation Signed By THAT the City of Sudbury advise Industry Canada that they concur with the issuance of a licence for the development of a 80 metre high self support telecommunications tower at PIN 73504 Report Prepared By 2043, Parcel 24564 S.E.S., Part of Lot 5, Concession 3, Hanmer Eric Taylor Manager of Development Approvals Township, City of Greater Sudbury by Rogers Communications Digitally Signed May 13, 14 Inc. Recommended by the Division Mark Simeoni Acting Director of Planning Services Background Digitally Signed May 13, 14 Applications for telecommunications facilities are under the Recommended by the Department Paul Baskcomb jurisdiction of Industry Canada. Industry Canada requires that the Acting General Manager of Growth & proponent of a new telecommunication facility must consult with Development the municipality and indicate whether the municipality concurs Digitally Signed May 13, 14 with the application. It is noted that telecommunications facilities Recommended by the C.A.O. are not subject to municipal zoning regulations and municipal Doug Nadorozny concurrence is not necessarily required in order for Industry Chief Administrative Officer Digitally Signed May 13, 14 Canada to issue a licence. Rogers Communications is proposing the construction of a 80 m (262 ft.) high telecommunications self-support tower on a 30 ha (74.8 acre), property located on the north side of Municipal Road 80 in the community of Val Therese.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics Guide
    1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT GREATER SUDBURY ................................................................................................................................................. 1 GREATER SUDBURY CMA ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 POPULATION ........................................................................................................................................ 2 AGE CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................................................................... 3 HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................................ 4 MARITAL STATUS .................................................................................................................................. 4 FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................................................................................... 5 2016 NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ................................................................................................................................. 6 GREATER SUDBURY CMA ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 EDUCATION .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Background Business Case for Valley East Twin
    Background At the June 19, 2017 Community Services Committee meeting, resolution CS2017-16 was passed stating “that the City of Greater Sudbury Council directs staff to prepare a business case to replace various arenas and/or ice pads, with the build of a multi- pad/multi-purpose arena facility in Valley East, indicating the cost of the build, recommended location, efficiencies to be had, financial options for the build, and any/or all other information to assist Council with its deliberations, to be included in the 2018 budget process.” As part of the 2018 budget process, Council received a business case for a Valley East Twin Pad arena. The business case identified the Howard Armstrong Recreation Centre location as a potential location for a new twin pad facility. Business Case for Valley East Twin Pad At the December 5th, 2017 Finance and Administration meeting staff presented a business case titled Valley East Twin Pad for Council’s consideration. The business case informed Council of the following: The City of Greater Sudbury (City) operates a total of sixteen (16) ice pads that are contained in fourteen (14) municipal arenas, with Capreol Arena and Gerry McCrory Countryside Sports Complex being twin pad facilities. The average age of the ice facilities in the City is more than 40 years, with the majority being constructed between 1950 and 1978. The City has a surplus of 1.8 ice pads at present and data suggests insufficient support for expanding the supply of municipal arenas. Capital requirements over the 10 years for the existing inventory of arenas in Valley East (Raymond Plourde, Centennial, and Capreol - Side 1 Arenas) amount to $6.67 million.
    [Show full text]
  • 1989, December
    LUbUtt INCO PUBLIC Y DECEMBER Ontario Divison 1989 Entry wins first place Batman float a crowd pleaser The floaters at Environmen- turn the groundskeeping tractor fitted as Batman and agriculture tal Control have done us proud into a convincing Batmobile department employee Jerry • . again. from pieces of plywood, metal Zanuttig was transformed into Once again, the folks at the and even a roof vent. the Joker. agriculture section of En- "We never worry about run- Jerry voluntarily shaved off vironmental Control and Oc- ning out of ideas," mused Dad. a muchioved beard to play the cupational Health have put "It hasn't been a problem so role, which is perhaps one in- down their gardening tools and far. I guess you have to be a bit dication of the strength of the turned their fertile minds to of a kid at heart." Christmas spirit at lnco. create the winning float in this It took just two weeks for Ray Beaudreault, a musician year's Santa Claus Parade. the department's crew to build who plays with the Old South It took no little imagination the 18-foot finned creation, Band in his spare time, added to combine the Yuletide complete with a metal frame, the finishing touches to this festivities with this year's Bat- sleek black paint job and a year's entry by writing a song to mania to create a "Christmas front-end air intake for the jet go with the float. The song was Cruise with Batman," a float engine made from a roof vent. recorded (recording studio ex- that transformed one of the "We worked from a Bat- penses were paid by inco) and department's tractors into a Bat- mobile model," said Dan.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Gazette, Part I
    EXTRA Vol. 153, No. 12 ÉDITION SPÉCIALE Vol. 153, no 12 Canada Gazette Gazette du Canada Part I Partie I OTTAWA, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2019 OTTAWA, LE JEUDI 14 NOVEMBRE 2019 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER BUREAU DU DIRECTEUR GÉNÉRAL DES ÉLECTIONS CANADA ELECTIONS ACT LOI ÉLECTORALE DU CANADA Return of Members elected at the 43rd general Rapport de député(e)s élu(e)s à la 43e élection election générale Notice is hereby given, pursuant to section 317 of the Can- Avis est par les présentes donné, conformément à l’ar- ada Elections Act, that returns, in the following order, ticle 317 de la Loi électorale du Canada, que les rapports, have been received of the election of Members to serve in dans l’ordre ci-dessous, ont été reçus relativement à l’élec- the House of Commons of Canada for the following elec- tion de député(e)s à la Chambre des communes du Canada toral districts: pour les circonscriptions ci-après mentionnées : Electoral District Member Circonscription Député(e) Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Matapédia Kristina Michaud Matapédia Kristina Michaud La Prairie Alain Therrien La Prairie Alain Therrien LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Burnaby South Jagmeet Singh Burnaby-Sud Jagmeet Singh Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke Randall Garrison Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Sudbury Source Protection Area Assessment Report
    Greater Sudbury Source Protection Area Assessment Report Approved on September 2, 2014 Greater Sudbury Source Protection Area Assessment Report The Greater Sudbury Source Protection Area Assessment Report Introduction Limitations of this Report ......................................................................................... 13 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 14 Sommaire ................................................................................................................ 18 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. 21 Foreword ................................................................................................................. 22 Preface .................................................................................................................... 24 Part 1 – Report Overview and Methodology Chapter 1 - Overview of the Assessment Report .................................................... 1-5 Chapter 2 - Water Quality Risk Assessment ........................................................... 1-9 Chapter 3 - Water Quantity Risk Assessment ...................................................... 1-23 Part 2 – The Greater Sudbury Source Protection Area Chapter 4 - The Greater Sudbury Source Protection Area: A Tale of Three Rivers 2-5 Chapter 5 - Drinking Water Systems ...................................................................... 2-7 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Designated Truck Routes
    Designated Truck Routes Click here to view a map of the designated truck routes. Balsam Street (Sudbury) – from Lorne Street (M.R. 55) to Godfrey Drive Barry Downe Road (Sudbury) – from the Kingsway to Maley Drive Beatty Street (Sudbury) – from Elm Street to Frood Road Beech Street (Sudbury) – from Frood Road to Durham Street Big Nickel Road (Sudbury) – from Lorne Street to Elm Street Brady Street (Sudbury) – from Douglas Street to Lloyd Street Cedar Street (Sudbury) – from Paris Street to Brady Street Church Street (Nickel Centre) – from Falconbridge Highway to North End Côté Boulevard (Valley East) – from Notre Dame Street to Radar Road Dennie Street (Capreol) – from Meehan Avenue to Sellwood Avenue Desmarais Road (Valley East) – from Municipal Road 80 (M.R. 80) to North End Douglas Street (Sudbury) – from Regent Street to Brady Street Durham Street (Sudbury) – from Elm Street to Beech Street Elgin Street (Sudbury) – from Larch Street to Elm Street Elm Street (Sudbury) – from Notre Dame Avenue to West End Errington Street (Rayside) – from Highway 144 to Main Street Fairbank Lake Road (Walden) – from Highway 17 to North End Falconbridge Road (Sudbury and Nickel Centre) – from Kingsway to Longyear Drive Frood Road (Sudbury) – from Elm Street to Turner Avenue Garrow Road (Sudbury) – from Balsam Street to Serpentine Street Garson-Coniston Road (Nickel Centre) – from Highway 17 to Falconbridge Highway Godfrey Drive (Sudbury) – from Power Street to Serpentine Street Gordon Lake Road (Onaping Falls, Rayside) – from Highway 144 to South End
    [Show full text]
  • The Greater Sudbury Source Protection Area
    Part Two The Greater Sudbury Source Protection Area Meandering through one of Canada’s largest mining centres and covering 9,150 km2 are three large river systems: the Vermilion, the Wanapitei and the Whitefish. Approved on September 2, 2014 Minor revisions on March 1, 2017 Greater Sudbury Source Protection Area Assessment Report Table of Contents Chapter 4 – The Greater Sudbury Source Protection Area: A Tale of Three Rivers ... 2-5 Chapter 5 – Drinking Water Systems ............................................................................. 2-7 5.1 Large Municipal Residential Drinking Water Systems ............................................ 2-7 5.2 Small Non-municipal, Non-residential ................................................................... 2-8 5.3 Non-municipal, Year Round Residential ................................................................. 2-8 Chapter 6 – Physical Geography .................................................................................... 2-9 6.1 Topography ............................................................................................................ 2-9 6.2 Soil Characteristics ................................................................................................ 2-9 6.3 Land Cover .......................................................................................................... 2-10 6.4 Forest Cover ........................................................................................................ 2-10 6.5 Wetlands .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2021 City of Greater Sudbury Transit Accessibility Plan
    2019-2021 Greater Sudbury Transit Accessibility Plan 2019-2021 Greater Sudbury Transit Accessibility Plan Introduction To build Greater Sudbury Transit as a viable transportation option, all customers must have access to its services. An accessible fleet was a significant step in this direction. However, overall system accessibility consists of many elements beyond accessible vehicles, including but not limited to: increased service levels, facility access, improved pedestrian connections, bus stop and shelter standards, signage, wayfinding and supportive operational programs, policies and customer service. For many, Greater Sudbury Transit is the only means of travel to and from work, school, medical appointments, community events and social activities. As Greater Sudbury Transit Service’s accessibility improves, everyone benefits, leading to improved connectivity, citizens transportation independence and increased ridership. Greater Sudbury Transit is dedicated to: • Developing, improving and enhancing accessible transit services and associated facilities/infrastructure. • Including persons with disabilities in developing/reviewing accessibility plans. • Providing accessible services to customers; and • Optimizing municipal investments to provide the right service for individuals (ex: door-to-door specialized transit, accessible conventional services). The City of Greater Sudbury has affirmed its commitment to providing its citizens with an inclusive and accessible community through its passage and adoption of strategies and policies that promote these values. Of note is the recent commitment made by Council in the 2019-2027 City of Greater Sudbury Corporate Strategic Plan that identifies, as a priority, the creation of a healthier community by implementing the Age- Friendly Strategy and ensuring accessibility. The City of Greater Sudbury supports the rights of persons of all ages and abilities to enjoy equal opportunities and to participate fully in the life of the community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Parks and Open Spaces to That Image
    A Study of the Image of Kenora and the Contribution of Parks and Open Spaces to that Image By Diane P. Ukrainec, B.E.S. A P¡acticum Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in Pa¡tial Fuifillmeni of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Landscape A¡chitectu¡e Department of Landscape Architectu¡e University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba (c) January, 1994 s.v.p. choisir le suiet quì dé{rit le mieux volre |_TTN UM.I CODE DE SUIET B¡bliothèque nalionale E*E ï,*i3'o:o"o du Canada Acqu¡sil¡ons and Direction des acquisitions et B¡bliographic Services Branch des serv¡ces bibliographiques 395 We¡linoton SIreel 395, rue Wellington Oflawa, Oñt8rio Onawa (Onlario) K1A ON4 KlA ON4 You hte Vohø télêrc.,ce Ovt hte Nohê télëtencê T}IE AUTHORHAS GRANTED AN L'AUTEUR A ACCORDE UNE LICENCE IRREVOCABLE NON-EXCLUSIVE IRREVOCABLE ET NON EXCLUSIVE LICENCE ALLOWING TITE NATIONAL PERMETTANT A LA BIBLIOTIIEQUE LIBRARY OF CANADA TO NATIONALE DU CANADA DE REPRODUCE, LOAN, DISTRIBUTE OR REPRODUIRE, PRETE& DISTRIBUER SELL COPIES OF HIS/IIER THESIS BY OU VENDRE DES COPIES DE SA ANY MEANS AND IN ANY FORM OR THESE DE QTJELQIIE MANIERE ET FORMAT, MAKING THIS TITESIS SOUS QTJELQUE FORME QIJE CE SOIT AVAILABLE TO INTERESTED POUR METTRE DES E)GMPLAIRES DE PERSONS. CETTE TIÌESE A LA DISPOSITION DES PERSONNE INTERESSEES. TIIE AUTHOR RETAINS OWNERSHIP L'AUTEUR CONSERVE LA PROPRIETE OF THE COPYRIGHT IN HISÆIER DU DROIT D'AUTEUR QUI PROTEGE THESIS. NEITIIER THE TIIESIS NOR SA TI{ESE. NI LA TTIESE M DES SUBSTANTIAL EXTRACTS FROM IT EXTRAITS SUBSTANTIELS DE CELLE- MAYBE PRINTED OR OTHERWISE CI NE DOIVENT ETRE IMPRIMES OU REPRODUCED \ryITTTOUT HISÆ{ER AUTREMENT REPRODUITS SANS SON PERMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report2011-2012 Welcome to Rainbow Schools
    Annual Report2011-2012 Welcome to Rainbow Schools 1 Message from the Chair of the Board 2 Message from Vision Mission the Director of Education We are leaders in learning, We bring learning to life, inspiring success for all enabling students students by reaching minds to fulfill their aspirations. 3 Trustees and touching hearts. 3 Executive Council 4 Ensure success for all Values Priorities ✤ Honesty ✤ Courtesy ✤ Ensure success for all ✤ Respect ✤ Resilience 15 Ensure efficient (Literacy, Numeracy, Pathways ✤ Empathy ✤ Acceptance resource management and Community, Culture and Caring) ✤ Responsibility ✤ Courage ✤ Ensure efficient resource management ✤ Integrity ✤ Co-operation ✤ Promote succession planning 21 Promote succession planning 23 Awards 24 Scholarship Winners 29 Ontario Scholars 30 Directory School boards in Ontario are required to produce an Annual Report in accordance with The Education Act. This Annual Report Strategic Directions and the multi-year plan provides highlights of Rainbow District are available on the Board’s website: School Board’s key activities during the 2011-2012 school year. It also offers www.rainbowschools.ca/about/strategicDirections.php an overview of the current Board budget. On behalf of the Board of Trustees, I am pleased to present Message the 2011-2012 Annual Report for Rainbow District School Board to the Premier of Ontario, the Minister of Education and our many partners in Sudbury, Espanola, Manitoulin Island from the and Shining Tree. The school year began with the official Chair of opening of Princess Anne Public School and Walden Public School, another chapter in the revitalization of Rainbow Schools. The new arts wing at the Board Sudbury Secondary School welcomed its first group of students and work progressed on the renewal of the Sheridan Auditorium.
    [Show full text]