DOCSLIB.ORG

Building Feminism, Resisting Porn Culture: Where to from Here Rebecca Whisnant University of Dayton, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building Feminism, Resisting Porn Culture: Where to from Here Rebecca Whisnant University of Dayton, Rwhisnant1@Udayton.Edu University of Dayton eCommons Philosophy Faculty Publications Department of Philosophy 2015 Building Feminism, Resisting Porn Culture: Where To from Here Rebecca Whisnant University of Dayton, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/phl_fac_pub Part of the Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons eCommons Citation Whisnant, Rebecca, "Building Feminism, Resisting Porn Culture: Where To from Here" (2015). Philosophy Faculty Publications. 160. http://ecommons.udayton.edu/phl_fac_pub/160 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Philosophy at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Building feminism, resisting porn culture: where to from here? Rebecca Whisnant In chapter one, I wrote about some of the fundamental differences between radical feminism and liberal or third wave feminism and, in particular, how these branches of feminism approach pornography. I also wrote about the importance of radical feminism for recognising and resisting oppression. In this chapter, I pick up these threads again and discuss the key elements that radical feminism can contribute to the rebuilding of a powerful movement for women's liberation in the era of porn culture. First things first, we need more people, more of the time, out there presenting radical feminist critique. I happen to know, for instance, that many bright and well-intentioned young people are toeing the third wave, sexual libertarian line because it's all they've been taught in their women's studies classes. And, of course, many people outside the academy have very little exposure to feminist critiques of virtually anything. So part of this is a sheer labour problem. We need more bodies and more voices. But not only do we need more people doing and saying the same things, I think that we also need to do and say some different things, or at least some additional things. As porn culture becomes ever more pervasive and soul-destroying, and as it starts to directly affect more people's lives in ways they're aware of, many people are looking for a way out. The problem is that they don't see any alternative, and much of what they're told is different and alternative really isn't. For instance, the most obvious cultural and political force that presents itself as an alternative - indeed, is often seen as the only The Limitsof LiberalFeminism 201 200 FreedomFallacy and rebellion against said values by buying a stripper pole and learning alternative - to porn culture is a religious, predominantly Christian, social conservatism. Now that's no good for women, and part of the to lap dance. 'What? You say that doesn't seem like authentic femal.e sexuality or sexual liberation to you? What are you, a right-wing, "anti- appeal of third wave, pro-porn politics resides in its apparent rebellion against such conservatism. This leads me to my first suggestion sex" prude?' about how to frame our critique of porn culture: namely by showing This ~urface conflict in sexual ideology between right and left that - contrary to popular belief - conservative and pornographic serves male power by masking a deeper agreement. For both camps, ideologies of sex and gender are very nearly synonymous, the surface after all it is an article of faith that sex makes women dirty, cheap, differences between the two obscuring their fundamental unity. As less valuable, that being fucked literally degrades women and girls. radical feminists have long observed, male sexual ownership and Furthermore, in both camps, women and girls are systematically made control of women is a matter of fundamental agreement between to suffer for having sex. In the world of pornography, the sex itself the male-defined political right and the almost equally male-defined _ aggressive, hostile, humiliating - is the punishment, the mechanism political left. The right typically supports the private male ownership by which men viscerally experience their manhood by putting wo~en g of women one at a time, as wives and daughters, localised in the in our place. In the world of 'traditional family values' the su.ffertn home and the 'traditional family'; whereas the left too often defends of shame, stigma, unwanted pregnancy (or at least the fear of It), and men's collective sexual ownership of women outside the home, in the forced childbirth is a woman's just punishment for having had sex 'public domain', including in pornography and prostitution. To reject that she shouldn't have had. And in both worlds we hear the constant both forms of male sexual ownership, as radical feminis ts do, is thus refrain _ sometimes whispered, sometimes shouted - 'Bitch. Slut. to commit the ultimate heresy. Dirty whore. You're getting what you deserve.' As Andrea Dworkin once put it: 'Pretending to argue, they collude. And if one don't get Yet only such principled rejection can effectively challenge the , \ sexual abuse and commodification of women and girls both inside you, the other will. and outside the 'traditional family'. Until we find ways to communicate As daunting as this convergence is, it also suggests a certain the linked dangers of both forms of male control, the fear of one hermeneutic of feminist resistance, one that, happily, is pretty easy to form will continue to send women and girls directly into the lap of communicate. People who care about justice and who want a way out the other. The conservatives say to us: of porn culture need to act and think in ways that won't m~ke either bunch of woman-haters happy. If you're doing and saytng things that Hey, ladies, don't like what you see in pornography? Ugly, the religious right and the libertarian left both really hate, then you're isn't it? You say you don't want that to happen to you, or for men to think of you like that? Well, then, be good girls and on the right track! So that's my fiist suggestion. keep your legs closed. Be abstinent until marriage, and then My second suggestion is that we connect our critique of. por~o- God says your husband has to honour and value you and graphy and porn culture to a broader critique of the commodlfica~on protect you from other men. (You just have to obey him). of everyday life and, in so doing, promote a non-marketised conception of freedom. Now that's a mouthful, I know. To start illustrating it, I Meanwhile, women and girls who recognise the patriarchal trap of want to share with you a couple of anecdotes from my recent trip 'traditional familyvalues' are urged to demonstrate their independence The Limits of Liberal Feminism 203 202 Freedom Fallacy to a college which shall remain nameless, but which is known both part of their lives; they want to be free and open with their sexuality. for its stellar academics and for its progressive politics. I'll call it 'Alt. So that's why they want to make and use pornography.' There's a sweet kind of humour here: every generation thinks it invented sex. But College'. more relevant, for our purposes, there are two massive assumptions Overall, my visit to Alt. College was wonderful: I visited some underlying'this young woman's comment, both of which we need to classes and gave an anti-pornography slideshow in the evening to a challenge whenever we see an opening to do so. large and receptive audience. During the question and answer period The first assumption is that, for some experience or activity to that followed, a young woman raised her hand. Clearly troubled by be important, real, and considerable, it must be made into an image: what she had heard and seen, she asked: 'Well, what if we all just take a picture, roll video, turn on the webcam. As Gail Dines is fond get together and tell the porn industry that this isn't what we want- of pointing out, we live in an image-based culture. Everything has to that we want something more complex, more diverse, less hateful and be made into an image, and we derive our conception of who and one-dimensional? Wouldn't they have to change their ways and give what we are largely from the images that surround us. But here is a us what we want?' question: when you are doing something - virtually anything - are you There are many assumptions lurking in this query that we would more or less free in doing it when you know someone is watching? do well to challenge, but what I want to highlight is the faith that's What if they're taking pictures? What if they're going to show those being shown in the wonders of the capitalist marketplace. To this pictures to a whole bunch of people you don't even know? (Are you very bright, progressive, feminist young woman, here in this bastion feeling free yet?) For instance, do you dance crazier and more freely of liberal-to-radical politics, it seemed plausible to think that - in this when you're by yourself in your bedroom, or out at the nightclub connection at least- the market will solve all of our problems. Now in when your image is being projected on the big screen? making this assumption, there is something important that she fails to The second assumption underlying this young woman's comment understand, namely that the cultural products of mega-corporations is that, for some experience or activity to be important, real, and are much more like advertising than they are like art.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rethinking Coalitions: Anti-Pornography Feminists, Conservatives, and Relationships Between Collaborative Adversarial Movements
    Rethinking Coalitions: Anti-Pornography Feminists, Conservatives, and Relationships between Collaborative Adversarial Movements Nancy Whittier This research was partially supported by the Center for Advanced Study in Behavioral Sciences. The author thanks the following people for their comments: Martha Ackelsberg, Steven Boutcher, Kai Heidemann, Holly McCammon, Ziad Munson, Jo Reger, Marc Steinberg, Kim Voss, the anonymous reviewers for Social Problems, and editor Becky Pettit. A previous version of this paper was presented at the 2011 Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association. Direct correspondence to Nancy Whittier, 10 Prospect St., Smith College, Northampton MA 01063. Email: [email protected]. 1 Abstract Social movements interact in a wide range of ways, yet we have only a few concepts for thinking about these interactions: coalition, spillover, and opposition. Many social movements interact with each other as neither coalition partners nor opposing movements. In this paper, I argue that we need to think more broadly and precisely about the relationships between movements and suggest a framework for conceptualizing non- coalitional interaction between movements. Although social movements scholars have not theorized such interactions, “strange bedfellows” are not uncommon. They differ from coalitions in form, dynamics, relationship to larger movements, and consequences. I first distinguish types of relationships between movements based on extent of interaction and ideological congruence and describe the relationship between collaborating, ideologically-opposed movements, which I call “collaborative adversarial relationships.” Second, I differentiate among the dimensions along which social movements may interact and outline the range of forms that collaborative adversarial relationships may take. Third, I theorize factors that influence collaborative adversarial relationships’ development over time, the effects on participants and consequences for larger movements, in contrast to coalitions.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWARD a FEMINIST THEORY of the STATE Catharine A. Mackinnon
    TOWARD A FEMINIST THEORY OF THE STATE Catharine A. MacKinnon Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England K 644 M33 1989 ---- -- scoTT--- -- Copyright© 1989 Catharine A. MacKinnon All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America IO 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 First Harvard University Press paperback edition, 1991 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data MacKinnon, Catharine A. Toward a fe minist theory of the state I Catharine. A. MacKinnon. p. em. Bibliography: p. Includes index. ISBN o-674-89645-9 (alk. paper) (cloth) ISBN o-674-89646-7 (paper) I. Women-Legal status, laws, etc. 2. Women and socialism. I. Title. K644.M33 1989 346.0I I 34--dC20 [342.6134} 89-7540 CIP For Kent Harvey l I Contents Preface 1x I. Feminism and Marxism I I . The Problem of Marxism and Feminism 3 2. A Feminist Critique of Marx and Engels I 3 3· A Marxist Critique of Feminism 37 4· Attempts at Synthesis 6o II. Method 8 I - --t:i\Consciousness Raising �83 .r � Method and Politics - 106 -7. Sexuality 126 • III. The State I 55 -8. The Liberal State r 57 Rape: On Coercion and Consent I7 I Abortion: On Public and Private I 84 Pornography: On Morality and Politics I95 _I2. Sex Equality: Q .J:.diff�_re11c::e and Dominance 2I 5 !l ·- ····-' -� &3· · Toward Feminist Jurisprudence 237 ' Notes 25I Credits 32I Index 323 I I 'li Preface. Writing a book over an eighteen-year period becomes, eventually, much like coauthoring it with one's previous selves. The results in this case are at once a collaborative intellectual odyssey and a sustained theoretical argument.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Not Andrea : The Fictionality of the Corporeal in the Writings of Andrea Dworkin MACBRAYNE, ISOBEL How to cite: MACBRAYNE, ISOBEL (2014) Not Andrea : The Fictionality of the Corporeal in the Writings of Andrea Dworkin, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10818/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 “Not Andrea”: The Fictionality of the Corporeal in the Writings of Andrea Dworkin Submitted for the degree of Masters by Research in English Literature By Isobel MacBrayne 1 Contents Acknowledgments Introduction 4 Chapter I – Re-assessing the Feminist Polemic and its Relation to Fiction 10 Chapter II – Intertextuality in Dworkin’s Fiction 32 Chapter III – The construction of Dworkin and Her Media Representation 65 Conclusion 97 2 Acknowledgments I would like to thank Durham University for giving me this opportunity, the staff of the English Department, and all the admin and library staff whose time and hard work too often goes unnoticed.
    [Show full text]
  • “How Can a Woman Who Has Been Raped Be Believed?”: Andrea Dworkin, Sexual Violence and the Ethics of Belief
    “How Can a Woman Who Has Been Raped Be Believed?”: Andrea Dworkin, Sexual Violence and the Ethics of Belief Serisier, T. (2015). “How Can a Woman Who Has Been Raped Be Believed?”: Andrea Dworkin, Sexual Violence and the Ethics of Belief. Diegesis, 4(1), 68-87. https://www.diegesis.uni- wuppertal.de/index.php/diegesis/article/view/191 Published in: Diegesis Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2015 The Author This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits distribution and reproduction for non-commercial purposes, provided the author and source are cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:30. Sep. 2021 Tanya Serisier “How Can a Woman Who Has Been Raped Be Be- lieved?” Andrea Dworkin, Sexual Violence and the Ethics of Belief1 In June 2000, Andrea Dworkin, an American feminist activist and author, pub- lished an account of being raped in a Paris hotel room a year earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrea Dworkin's Woman Hating
    PLUME Published by the Penguin Group Penguin Books USA Inc., 375 Hudson Street, New York, New York 10014, U. S.A. Penguin Books Ltd, 27 Wrights Lane, London W8 5TZ, England Penguin Books Australia Ltd, Ringwood, Victoria, Australia Penguin Books Canada Ltd, 10 Alcorn Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4V 3B2 Penguin Books (N. Z. ) Ltd, 182-190 Wairau Road, Auckland 10, New Zealand Penguin Books Ltd, Registered Offices: Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England Published by Plume, an imprint of New American Library, a division of Penguin Books USA Inc. 10 9876543 Copyright © 1974 by Andrea Dworkin All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Drawing on page 98 by Jean Holabird Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopy­ ing, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the above publisher of this book. BOOKS ARE AVAILABLE AT QUANTITY DISCOUNTS WHEN USED TO PROMOTE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE WRITE TO PREMIUM MARKETING DIVISION, PENGUIN BOOKS USA INC., 375 HUDSON STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK IOOI4. Permissions are on page 218 For Grace Paley and in Memory of Emma Goldman . Shakespeare had a sister; but do not look for her in Sir Sidney Lee’s life of the poet. She died young —alas, she never wrote a word.. Now my belief is that this poet who never wrote a word and was buried at the crossroads still lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Split at the Root: Prostitution and Feminist Discourses of Law Reform
    Split at the Root: Prostitution and Feminist Discourses of Law Reform Margaret A. Baldwin My case is not unique. Violette Leduc' Today, adjustment to what is possible no longer means adjustment, it means making the possible real. Theodor Adorno2 This article originated in some years of feminist activism, and a sustained effort to understand two sentences spoken by Evelina Giobbe, an anti- prostitution activist and educator, at a radical feminist conference in 1987. She said: "Prostitution isn't like anything else. Rather, everything else is like prostitution because it is the model for women's condition."' Since that time, t Assistant Professor of Law, Florida State University College of Law. For my family: Mother Marge, Bob, Tim, John, Scharl, Marilynne, Jim, Robert, and in memory of my father, James. This article was supported by summer research grants from Florida State University College of Law. Otherwise, it is a woman-made product. Thanks to Rhoda Kibler, Mary LaFrance, Sheryl Walter, Annie McCombs, Dorothy Teer, Susan Mooney, Marybeth Carter, Susan Hunter, K.C. Reed, Margy Gast, and Christine Jones for the encouragement, confidence, and love. Evelina Giobbe, Kathleen Barry, K.C. Reed, Susan Hunter, and Toby Summer, whose contributions to work on prostitution have made mine possible, let me know I had something to say. The NCASA Basement Drafting Committee was a turning point. Catharine MacKinnon gave me the first opportunity to get something down on paper; she and Andrea Dworkin let me know the effort counted. Mimi Wilkinson and Stacey Dougan ably assisted in the research and in commenting on drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Dworkin, Andrea (1946-2005) by Linda Rapp
    Dworkin, Andrea (1946-2005) by Linda Rapp Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Entry Copyright © 2005, glbtq, inc. Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com Controversial radical feminist Andrea Dworkin wrote and spoke extensively regarding the cultural subjugation of women. She was particularly vigorous in her opposition to pornography. While some considered her a heroine for her attacks on patriarchy, others found her polemical pronouncements too extreme to be taken seriously. Andrea Dworkin, born September 26, 1946, came from a middle-class family in Camden, New Jersey. Rather curiously, the woman who would later decry men as moral cretins was close to her father, whom she credited with making her aware of the importance of social activism, and to her younger brother, but she did not get along well with her mother. In her book Life and Death: Unapologetic Writings on the Continuing War against Women (1997), Dworkin recalled traumatic events of her childhood, including being raped by a stranger at age nine and seduced by one of her high school teachers. Dworkin enrolled as a literature major at Bennington College in Vermont in 1964. While studying there, she periodically traveled to New York City to participate in protests against the war in Vietnam. On one such occasion in February 1965 she was arrested and held in the Women's House of Detention for several days, during which time she was subjected to humiliating strip searches and painful examinations by doctors. Upon being released, she took her story to the press. An investigation of the jail ensued, and it was eventually closed.
    [Show full text]
  • From Practice to Theory, Or What Is a White Woman Anyway?
    From Practice to Theory, or What is a White Woman Anyway? Catharine A. MacKinnon t And ain't I a woman? Sojourner Truth' Black feminists speak as women because we are women .... Audre Lorde2 It is common to say that something is good in theory but not in practice. I always want to say, then it is not such a good theory, is it? To be good in theory but not in practice posits a relation between theory and practice that places theory prior to practice, both methodologically and normatively, as if theory is a terrain unto itself. The conventional image of the relation between the two is first theory, then practice. You have an idea, then act on it. In legal academia you theorize, then try to get some practitioner to put it into practice. To be more exact, you 'read law review articles, then write more law review articles. The closest most legal academics come to practice is teaching-their students, most of whom will practice, being regarded by many as an occupational hazard to their theorizing. The postmodern version of the relation between theory and practice is discourse unto death. Theory begets no practice, only more text. It proceeds as if you can deconstruct power relations by shifting their markers around in your head. Like all formal idealism, this approach to theory tends unselfconsciously to reproduce existing relations of dominance, in part because it is an utterly removed elite activity. On this level, all theory is a form of practice, because it either subverts or shores up existing deployments of power, in their martial metaphor.
    [Show full text]
  • Duke University Dissertation Template
    Facts and Fictions: Feminist Literary Criticism and Cultural Critique, 1968-2012 by Leah Claire Allen Graduate Program in Literature Duke University Date: _______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Robyn Wiegman, Supervisor ___________________________ Michael Hardt ___________________________ Ranjana Khanna ___________________________ Priscilla Wald Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Program in Literature in the Graduate School of Duke University 2014 i v ABSTRACT Facts and Fictions: Feminist Literary Criticism and Cultural Critique, 1968-2012 by Leah Claire Allen Graduate Program in Literature Duke University Date: _______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Robyn Wiegman, Supervisor ___________________________ Michael Hardt ___________________________ Ranjana Khanna ___________________________ Priscilla Wald An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Program in Literature in the Graduate School of Duke University 2014 i v Copyright by Leah Claire Allen © 2014 Abstract “Facts and Fictions: Feminist Literary Criticism and Cultural Critique, 1968- 2012” is a critical history of the unfolding of feminist literary study in the US academy. It contributes to current scholarly efforts to revisit the 1970s by reconsidering often- repeated narratives about the critical naivety of feminist literary criticism in its initial articulation. As the story now goes, many of the most prominent feminist thinkers of the period engaged in unsophisticated literary analysis by conflating lived social reality with textual representation when they read works of literature as documentary evidence of real life. As a result, the work of these “bad critics,” particularly Kate Millett and Andrea Dworkin, has not been fully accounted for in literary critical terms.
    [Show full text]
  • A Current Listing of Contents Di
    a current listing of contents dI Volume 7 I Number 4 Winter 1988 Published by Susan Searing, Women's Studies Librarian University of Wisconsin System 112A Memorial Library 728 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 (608) 263- 5754 a current listing of contents Volume 7, Number 4 Winter 1988 Periodical 1i terature is the cutting edge of women's scholarship, feminist theory, and much of women's culture. Feminist Periodicals: A Current Listing of Contents is published by the Office of the University of Wisconsin System Women's Studies Librarian on a quarterly basis with the intent of increasing public awareness of feminist periodicals. It is our hope that Feminist Periodicals wi 11 serve several purposes: to keep the reader abreast of current topics in feminist literature; to increase readers' famil iarity with a wide spectrum of feminist periodicals; and to provide the requisite bibliographic information should a reader wish to subscribe to a journal or to obtain a particular article at her library or through interlibrary loan. (Users will need to be aware of the limitations of the new copyright law with regard to photocopying of copyrighted materials.) Table of contents pages from current issues of major feminist journals are reproduced in each issue of Feminist Periodicals, preceded by a comprehensive annotated listing of all journals we have selected. As publication schedules vary enormously, not every periodical will have table of contents pages reproduced in each issue of FP. The annotated listing provides the following information on each journal : Year of first publication. Frequency of pub1 icati on. U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Passion, Politics, and Politically Incorrect Sex: Towards a History Of
    PASSION, POLITICS, AND POLITICALLY INCORRECT SEX: TOWARDS A HISTORY OF LESBIAN SADOMASOCHISM IN THE USA 1975-1993 by Anna Robinson Submitted to the Department of Gender Studies, Central European University In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Erasmus Mundus Master's Degree in Women's and Gender Studies CEU eTD Collection Main supervisor: Francisca de Haan (Central European University) Second reader: Anne-Marie Korte (Utrecht University) Budapest, Hungary 2015 PASSION, POLITICS, AND POLITICALLY INCORRECT SEX: TOWARDS A HISTORY OF LESBIAN SADOMASOCHISM IN THE USA 1975-1993 by Anna Robinson Submitted to the Department of Gender Studies, Central European University In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Erasmus Mundus Master's Degree in Women's and Gender Studies Main supervisor: Francisca de Haan (Central European University) Second reader: Anne-Marie Korte (Utrecht University) CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2015 Approved by: ________________________ Abstract This thesis is an exploration of the largely underexamined history of lesbian sadomasochism (SM) in the United States between the mid-1970s, when the first organised lesbian feminist SM groups were founded, and 1993, by which time public debates about lesbian SM were becoming less visible. I engage with feminist discourses around lesbian SM within the so- called feminist sex wars of the 1980s, tracing the sometimes dramatic rise to prominence of lesbian SM as a feminist issue. Entwined in this web of controversy, I assert, is the story of a perceived fundamental split in the feminist movement between those who believed SM was patriarchal, abusive and violent, and those who saw it as a consensual expression of sexual freedom and liberation.
    [Show full text]
  • Kate Millett : Sexual Politics
    Dear students, Due to the pandemic, Covid 19, the whole world is under threat and has to fight against it, so we all have to join hands to overcome the crisis. But we don’t have to break our flow of knowledge through any means if we are not in the condition to meet in person in the classroom. We talked a lot in classroom and now it’s time to have some chat on online materials. Since our paper centres, and as the title of the paper suggests, around the position of women in a patriarchal society, we talked at a greater length, had a detailed discussion over the texts and critical essays prescribed in our course. As we know, that now we have to talk on the third unit which focuses on Women and Education, harassment of women at work places and Labour force restructuring; we need to have some talk on these subjects. We all know that no academic discussion over women, gender and sexuality will ever be complete if we drop four major feminists and their ground-breaking works. These feminists and their writings are: 1. Virginia Woolf: A Room of One’s Own and three Guinees 2. Simone de Beauvoir: The Second Sex 3. Kate Millett: Sexual Politics, and 4. Elaine Showalter: A Literature of Their Own So, I would like to share with you four chapters of my work devoted to said critics and their work which was published from Authorhouse, United Kingdom in 2012. I request you all to please go thoroughly trough the four pdf files I am sending to upload on the University website which will not only turn out to be a great asset for you on the paper, but also will enrich your insight on women’s studies.
    [Show full text]