DOCSLIB.ORG

From 1989 to 1994, and As a Writer and Teacher on Various Security Topics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From 1989 to 1994, and As a Writer and Teacher on Various Security Topics from 1989 to 1994, and as a writer announcements for further devel- companies (Ingres Corporation and teacher on various security opments. and Illustra Information Technolo- topics. The Board agreed to be a sponsor gies, Inc.) to market them as com- It is once again our good fortune of CodeCon 2005, which was held mercial products. He also initiated that Rik is willing to take the helm in San Francisco in February. the Mariposa project, which became the basis of another com- at ;login:. We look forward to his USENIX will make a $20,000 long and successful tenure! pany called Cohera, later sold to donation to Stichting SANE for the PeopleSoft. All three of these proj- SANE 2006 conference and will ects were developed at the Univer- S U M M A R Y OF U SEN IX BOA R D OF I offer a guarantee in the event that sity of California, Berkeley, where D I RE C TO R S MEETI N G S , D E C E M B E R there is a deficit. Dr. Stonebraker served as a profes- 2 0 0 4 – A P R I L 20 05XXXXXXXXXXXI sor of computer science for 25 Tara Mulligan COM M I T T E E S years. USENIX Member Services Manager The Board will create a subcom- Currently Dr. Stonebraker is an mittee chaired by Matt Blaze to adjunct professor of computer sci- M E M B E R S H I P look into fraudulent/dual paper ence at M.I.T., where he has submissions to conferences. The Board voted to increase Insti- helped build a stream processing tutional member benefits as fol- engine, Aurora. In 2003 he lows: NEXT MEETI N G founded StreamBase Systems to The next regular meeting of the market this technology, with him- Educational: Will receive up to 2 Board of Directors will be held on self as CTO. additional subscriptions to ;login:. Tuesday, August 2, 2005, at the He has authored and co-authored Corporate: Will receive up to 4 USENIX Security Symposium in scores of research papers on data- additional subscriptions to ;login:; Baltimore, MD. base technology, operating systems will be provided with five (5) design, and expert systems. He has member-priced conference regis- been active in the ACM Special trations during the membership A N NUAL AWA R D S Interest Group on Management of term; will receive multiple- Data (SIGMOD) both as a member employee discount registrations to U S E N IX LI F E T IME ACH I EVE- and a leader. allow more staff to attend USENIX M E N T (FLAME) AWA R D conferences; and will be listed on a WI N NER 2005 : M I C H A E L He has a B.S. from Princeton page linked from our Membership STO N E B RA K E R (1965) and an M.S. (1967) and a portal page during the member- Ph.D. (1971) from the University ship term. of Michigan. Supporting: Will receive up to 4 Dr. Stonebraker has also received additional subscriptions to;login:. several other awards, including the IEEE John von Neumann Medal in The new benefits will be imple- 2005, the ACM Software System mented over the next few months. Award in 1988, and the ACM SIG- If you are interested in upgrading MOD Innovations Award in 1994. your account or in learning more He was elected to the National about our classes of membership, Academy of Engineering in 1998. please see www.usenix.org/mem- Board President Michael B. Jones bership or contact us at member- presenting the Flame Award [email protected]. U S E N IX STU G (SO FT WA R E TO O L S USER GRO U P) AWA R D Dr. Michael Stonebraker has been WI N NE R S 200 5: MAT T H I A S CO N F E R E N C E S a leading database, operating sys- E T T R I C H AN D MIGU EL DE The USENIX Annual Technical tems, and expert systems designer, I C A Z A FOR KDE AND GNOM E Conference will be moved back both as an academic and as an The STUG award recognizes sig- into the early summer timeframe entrepreneur, for over thirty years. nificant contributions to the com- in 2006. It will also be reformatted He is well known for his work in munity that reflect the spirit and to address current issues in developing both the INGRES and character demonstrated by those advanced computing systems. POSTGRES database systems who came together in the Software Please check your USENIX news under a freely distributable BSD Tools User Group (STUG). Recipi- email messages and conference license, then going on to form ents of the annual STUG award 78 ; L O G I N : V O L . 3 0 , N O . 3 A KDE mascot goes to GNOME conspicuously exhibit a contribu- tion to the reusable code-base avail- able to all and/or the provision of a significant enabling technology to users in a widely available form. The UNIX Command Line User Interface (CLI), while widely rec- ognized as being efficient, has often been attacked by non-UNIX users as not user-friendly. In response, many GUIs have been added to UNIX over the years, but most were generally considered inferior to non-UNIX GUIs. In October of 1996 and August of 1997, two projects were started to produce desktops that were easy to use, adhered to traditional UNIX philosophies, and gave access to all of the underlying features of the CLI. While these desktops competed with each other, they also lent strength to each other and have now produced a range of applica- tions that we collectively call KDE and GNOME. These applications have eased implementations of the UNIX operating system in the non- technical marketplace. Most impor- tant, by embracing the concepts of free and open source software, these two desktop projects offered freely distributed code, which allowed any distribution or soft- ware developer to utilize these graphical features. The USENIX Association would like to recognize both of these groups for creating a very portable set of libraries, tools, and applica- tions. ; LO G I N : JU NE 20 05 U S E N IX NOTE S 79.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oracle Vs. Nosql Vs. Newsql Comparing Database Technology
    Oracle vs. NoSQL vs. NewSQL Comparing Database Technology John Ryan Senior Solution Architect, Snowflake Computing Table of Contents The World has Changed . 1 What’s Changed? . 2 What’s the Problem? . .. 3 Performance vs. Availability and Durability . 3 Consistecy vs. Availability . 4 Flexibility vs . Scalability . 5 ACID vs. Eventual Consistency . 6 The OLTP Database Reimagined . 7 Achieving the Impossible! . .. 8 NewSQL Database Technology . 9 VoltDB . 10 MemSQL . 11 Which Applications Need NewSQL Technology? . 12 Conclusion . 13 About the Author . 13 ii The World has Changed The world has changed massively in the past 20 years. Back in the year 2000, a few million users connected to the web using a 56k modem attached to a PC, and Amazon only sold books. Now billions of people are using to their smartphone or tablet 24x7 to buy just about everything, and they’re interacting with Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. The pace has been unstoppable . Expectations have also changed. If a web page doesn’t refresh within seconds we’re quickly frustrated, and go elsewhere. If a web site is down, we fear it’s the end of civilisation as we know it. If a major site is down, it makes global headlines. Instant gratification takes too long! — Ladawn Clare-Panton Aside: If you’re not a seasoned Database Architect, you may want to start with my previous articles on Scalability and Database Architecture. Oracle vs. NoSQL vs. NewSQL eBook 1 What’s Changed? The above leads to a few observations: • Scalability — With potentially explosive traffic growth, IT systems need to quickly grow to meet exponential numbers of transactions • High Availability — IT systems must run 24x7, and be resilient to failure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Declarative Imperative Experiences and Conjectures in Distributed Logic
    The Declarative Imperative Experiences and Conjectures in Distributed Logic Joseph M. Hellerstein University of California, Berkeley [email protected] ABSTRACT The juxtaposition of these trends presents stark alternatives. The rise of multicore processors and cloud computing is putting Will the forecasts of doom and gloom materialize in a storm enormous pressure on the software community to find solu- that drowns out progress in computing? Or is this the long- tions to the difficulty of parallel and distributed programming. delayed catharsis that will wash away today’s thicket of im- At the same time, there is more—and more varied—interest in perative languages, preparing the ground for a more fertile data-centric programming languages than at any time in com- declarative future? And what role might the database com- puting history, in part because these languages parallelize nat- munity play in shaping this future, having sowed the seeds of urally. This juxtaposition raises the possibility that the theory Datalog over the last quarter century? of declarative database query languages can provide a foun- Before addressing these issues directly, a few more words dation for the next generation of parallel and distributed pro- about both crisis and opportunity are in order. gramming languages. 1.1 Urgency: Parallelism In this paper I reflect on my group’s experience over seven years using Datalog extensions to build networking protocols I would be panicked if I were in industry. and distributed systems. Based on that experience, I present — John Hennessy, President, Stanford University [35] a number of theoretical conjectures that may both interest the database community, and clarify important practical issues in The need for parallelism is visible at micro and macro scales.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best Nurturers in Computer Science Research
    The Best Nurturers in Computer Science Research Bharath Kumar M. Y. N. Srikant IISc-CSA-TR-2004-10 http://archive.csa.iisc.ernet.in/TR/2004/10/ Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science, India October 2004 The Best Nurturers in Computer Science Research Bharath Kumar M.∗ Y. N. Srikant† Abstract The paper presents a heuristic for mining nurturers in temporally organized collaboration networks: people who facilitate the growth and success of the young ones. Specifically, this heuristic is applied to the computer science bibliographic data to find the best nurturers in computer science research. The measure of success is parameterized, and the paper demonstrates experiments and results with publication count and citations as success metrics. Rather than just the nurturer’s success, the heuristic captures the influence he has had in the indepen- dent success of the relatively young in the network. These results can hence be a useful resource to graduate students and post-doctoral can- didates. The heuristic is extended to accurately yield ranked nurturers inside a particular time period. Interestingly, there is a recognizable deviation between the rankings of the most successful researchers and the best nurturers, which although is obvious from a social perspective has not been statistically demonstrated. Keywords: Social Network Analysis, Bibliometrics, Temporal Data Mining. 1 Introduction Consider a student Arjun, who has finished his under-graduate degree in Computer Science, and is seeking a PhD degree followed by a successful career in Computer Science research. How does he choose his research advisor? He has the following options with him: 1. Look up the rankings of various universities [1], and apply to any “rea- sonably good” professor in any of the top universities.
    [Show full text]
  • SQL Vs Nosql
    SQL vs NoSQL By: Mohammed-Ali Khan Email: [email protected] Date: October 21, 2012 YORK UNIVERSITY Agenda ● History of DBMS – why relational is most popular? ● Types of DBMS – brief overview ● Main characteristics of RDBMS ● Main characteristics of NoSQL DBMS ● SQL vs NoSQL ● DB overview – Cassandra ● Criticism of NoSQL ● Some Predictions / Conclusions History of DBMS – why relational is most popular? ● 19th century: US Government needed reports from large datasets to conduct nation-wide census. ● 1890: Herman Hollerith creates the first automatic processing equipment which allowed American census to be conducted. ● 1911: IBM founded. ● 1960s: Efforts to standardize the database technology – US DoD: Conference on Data Systems Language (Codasyl). History of DBMS – why relational is most popular? ● 1968: IBM introduced IMS DBMS (a hierarchical DBMS). ● IBM employee Edgar Codd not satisfied, quoted as saying: – “Taking the old line view, that the burden of finding information should be placed on users...” ● Edgar Codd publishes a paper “A relational Model of Data for large shared Data Banks” – Key points: Independence of data from hardware/storage implementation – High level non-procedural language for data access – Pointers/keys (primary/secondary) History of DBMS – why relational is most popular? ● 1970s: Two database projects launched based on relational model – Ingres (Department of Defence Initiative) – System R (IBM) ● Ingres had its own query language called QUEL whereas System R used SQL. ● Larry Ellison, who worked at IBM, read publications of the System R group and eventually founded ORACLE. History of DBMS – why relational is most popular? ● 1980: IBM introduced SQL for the mainframe market. ● In a nutshell, American Government's requirements had a strong role in development of the relational DBMS.
    [Show full text]
  • DATA BASE RESEARCH at BERKELEY Michael Stonebraker
    DATA BASE RESEARCH AT BERKELEY Michael Stonebraker Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of California, Berkeley 1. INTRODUCTION the performance of the prototype, finishing the imple- Data base research at Berkeley can be decom- mentation of promised function, and on integrating ter- posed into four categories. First there is the POSTGRES tiary memory into the POSTGRES environment in a project led by Michael Stonebraker, which is building a more flexible way. next-generation DBMS with novel object management, General POSTGRES information can be obtained knowledge management and time travel capabilities. from the following references. Second, Larry Rowe leads the PICASSO project which [MOSH90] Mosher, C. (ed.), "The POSTGRES Ref- is constructing an advanced application development erence Manual, Version 2," University of tool kit for use with POSTGRES and other DBMSs. California, Electronics Research Labora- Third, there is the XPRS project (eXtended Postgres on tory, Technical Report UCB/ERL Raid and Sprite) which is led by four Berkeley faculty, M90-60, Berkeley, Ca., August 1990. Randy Katz, John Ousterhout, Dave Patterson and Michael Stonebraker. XPRS is exploring high perfor- [STON86] Stonebraker M. and Rowe, L., "The mance I/O systems and their efficient utilization by oper- Design of POSTGRES," Proc. 1986 ating systems and data managers. The last project is one ACM-SIGMOD Conference on Manage- aimed at improving the reliability of DBMS software by ment of Data, Washington, D.C., June dealing more effectively with software errors that is also 1986. led by Michael Stonebraker. [STON90] Stonebraker, M. et. al., "The Implementa- In this short paper we summarize work on POST- tion of POSTGRES," IEEE Transactions GRES, PICASSO, and software reliability and report on on Knowledge and Data Engineering, the XPRS work that is relevant to data management.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2106.11534V1 [Cs.DL] 22 Jun 2021 2 Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China 3 University of Southampton, Southampton, U.K
    Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Turing Award elites revisited: patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact Yinyu Jin1 · Sha Yuan1∗ · Zhou Shao2, 4 · Wendy Hall3 · Jie Tang4 Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract The Turing Award is recognized as the most influential and presti- gious award in the field of computer science(CS). With the rise of the science of science (SciSci), a large amount of bibliographic data has been analyzed in an attempt to understand the hidden mechanism of scientific evolution. These include the analysis of the Nobel Prize, including physics, chemistry, medicine, etc. In this article, we extract and analyze the data of 72 Turing Award lau- reates from the complete bibliographic data, fill the gap in the lack of Turing Award analysis, and discover the development characteristics of computer sci- ence as an independent discipline. First, we show most Turing Award laureates have long-term and high-quality educational backgrounds, and more than 61% of them have a degree in mathematics, which indicates that mathematics has played a significant role in the development of computer science. Secondly, the data shows that not all scholars have high productivity and high h-index; that is, the number of publications and h-index is not the leading indicator for evaluating the Turing Award. Third, the average age of awardees has increased from 40 to around 70 in recent years. This may be because new breakthroughs take longer, and some new technologies need time to prove their influence. Besides, we have also found that in the past ten years, international collabo- ration has experienced explosive growth, showing a new paradigm in the form of collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Back at Postgres
    Looking Back at Postgres Joseph M. Hellerstein [email protected] ABSTRACT etc.""efficient spatial searching" "complex integrity constraints" and This is a recollection of the UC Berkeley Postgres project, which "design hierarchies and multiple representations" of the same phys- was led by Mike Stonebraker from the mid-1980’s to the mid-1990’s. ical constructions [SRG83]. Based on motivations such as these, the The article was solicited for Stonebraker’s Turing Award book[Bro19], group started work on indexing (including Guttman’s influential as one of many personal/historical recollections. As a result it fo- R-trees for spatial indexing [Gut84], and on adding Abstract Data cuses on Stonebraker’s design ideas and leadership. But Stonebraker Types (ADTs) to a relational database system. ADTs were a pop- was never a coder, and he stayed out of the way of his development ular new programming language construct at the time, pioneered team. The Postgres codebase was the work of a team of brilliant stu- by subsequent Turing Award winner Barbara Liskov and explored dents and the occasional university “staff programmers” who had in database application programming by Stonebraker’s new collab- little more experience (and only slightly more compensation) than orator, Larry Rowe. In a paper in SIGMOD Record in 1983 [OFS83], the students. I was lucky to join that team as a student during the Stonebraker and students James Ong and Dennis Fogg describe an latter years of the project. I got helpful input on this writeup from exploration of this idea as an extension to Ingres called ADT-Ingres, some of the more senior students on the project, but any errors or which included many of the representational ideas that were ex- omissions are mine.
    [Show full text]
  • Operating Systems and Middleware: Supporting Controlled Interaction
    Operating Systems and Middleware: Supporting Controlled Interaction Max Hailperin Gustavus Adolphus College Revised Edition 1.1 July 27, 2011 Copyright c 2011 by Max Hailperin. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. Bibliography [1] Atul Adya, Barbara Liskov, and Patrick E. O’Neil. Generalized iso- lation level definitions. In Proceedings of the 16th International Con- ference on Data Engineering, pages 67–78. IEEE Computer Society, 2000. [2] Alfred V. Aho, Peter J. Denning, and Jeffrey D. Ullman. Principles of optimal page replacement. Journal of the ACM, 18(1):80–93, 1971. [3] AMD. AMD64 Architecture Programmer’s Manual Volume 2: System Programming, 3.09 edition, September 2003. Publication 24593. [4] Dave Anderson. You don’t know jack about disks. Queue, 1(4):20–30, 2003. [5] Dave Anderson, Jim Dykes, and Erik Riedel. More than an interface— SCSI vs. ATA. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference on File and Storage Technology (FAST). USENIX, March 2003. [6] Ross Anderson. Security Engineering: A Guide to Building Depend- able Distributed Systems. Wiley, 2nd edition, 2008. [7] Apple Computer, Inc. Kernel Programming, 2003. Inside Mac OS X. [8] Apple Computer, Inc. HFS Plus volume format. Technical Note TN1150, Apple Computer, Inc., March 2004. [9] Ozalp Babaoglu and William Joy. Converting a swap-based system to do paging in an architecture lacking page-referenced bits.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DESIGN of POSTGRES Abstract 1. INTRODUCTION 1
    THE DESIGN OF POSTGRES Michael Stonebraker and Lawrence A. Rowe Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California Berkeley, CA 94720 Abstract This paper presents the preliminary design of a new database management system, called POSTGRES, that is the successor to the INGRES relational database system. The main design goals of the new system are to: 1) provide better support for complex objects, 2) provide user extendibility for data types, operators and access methods, 3) provide facilities for active databases (i.e., alerters and triggers) and inferencing includ- ing forward- and backward-chaining, 4) simplify the DBMS code for crash recovery, 5) produce a design that can take advantage of optical disks, workstations composed of multiple tightly-coupled processors, and custom designed VLSI chips, and 6) make as few changes as possible (preferably none) to the relational model. The paper describes the query language, programming langauge interface, system architecture, query processing strategy, and storage system for the new system. 1. INTRODUCTION The INGRES relational database management system (DBMS) was implemented during 1975-1977 at the Univerisity of California. Since 1978 various prototype extensions have been made to support distributed databases [STON83a], ordered relations [STON83b], abstract data types [STON83c], and QUEL as a data type [STON84a]. In addition, we proposed but never pro- totyped a new application program interface [STON84b]. The University of California version of INGRES has been ``hacked up enough'' to make the inclusion of substantial new function extremely dif®cult. Another problem with continuing to extend the existing system is that many of our proposed ideas would be dif®cult to integrate into that system because of earlier design decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Readings in Database Systems, 5Th Edition (2015)
    Readings in Database Systems Fifth Edition edited by Peter Bailis Joseph M. Hellerstein Michael Stonebraker Readings in Database Systems Fifth Edition (2015) edited by Peter Bailis, Joseph M. Hellerstein, and Michael Stonebraker Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://www.redbook.io/ Contents Preface 3 Background Introduced by Michael Stonebraker 4 Traditional RDBMS Systems Introduced by Michael Stonebraker 6 Techniques Everyone Should Know Introduced by Peter Bailis 8 New DBMS Architectures Introduced by Michael Stonebraker 12 Large-Scale Dataflow Engines Introduced by Peter Bailis 14 Weak Isolation and Distribution Introduced by Peter Bailis 18 Query Optimization Introduced by Joe Hellerstein 22 Interactive Analytics Introduced by Joe Hellerstein 25 Languages Introduced by Joe Hellerstein 29 Web Data Introduced by Peter Bailis 33 A Biased Take on a Moving Target: Complex Analytics by Michael Stonebraker 35 A Biased Take on a Moving Target: Data Integration by Michael Stonebraker 40 List of All Readings 44 References 46 2 Readings in Database Systems, 5th Edition (2015) Introduction In the ten years since the previous edition of Read- Third, each selection is a primary source. There are ings in Database Systems, the field of data management good surveys on many of the topics in this collection, has exploded. Database and data-intensive systems to- which we reference in commentaries. However, read- day operate over unprecedented volumes of data, fueled ing primary sources provides historical context, gives in large part by the rise of “Big Data” and massive de- the reader exposure to the thinking that shaped influen- creases in the cost of storage and computation.
    [Show full text]
  • BIBTEX Meets Relational Databases Dedicated to the Memory of Edgar Frank “Ted” Codd (1923–2003) and James Nicholas “Jim” Gray (1944–2007) Nelson H
    252 TUGboat, Volume 30 (2009), No. 2 BIBTEX meets relational databases Dedicated to the memory of Edgar Frank “Ted” Codd (1923–2003) and James Nicholas “Jim” Gray (1944–2007) Nelson H. F. Beebe Abstract After giving some background and comments on the BIBTEX bibliographic database system, we discuss the problem of search- ing large collections of such data. We briefly describe how relational databases are structured and queried. Portable new programs, bibtosql and bibsql, are introduced and their use is illustrated. The first handles the conversion of BIBTEX data to input for three free, popular, and portable, database systems. The second provides a uniform and simple user interface for issuing search queries to any of the supported backend databases. We finish with a discussion of the contributions of the two late computer scientists to whom this article is dedicated. Contents 1 Introduction 252 2 An overview of BIBTEX 253 3 BIBTEX style-file language 253 4 BIBTEX grammar and software tools 254 5 The search problem 254 6 Relational databases 255 7 Structured Query Language (SQL) 256 8 BIBTEX database tables 256 9 BIBTEX/SQL software tools 258 10 Using SQL with bibsql 259 11 The impact of Ted Codd and Jim Gray 268 12 Conclusion 268 1 Introduction Oren Patashnik’s BIBTEX has been in wide use in the TEX and LATEX communities now for more than two decades af- ter it was introduced in the LATEX User’s Guide and Reference Manual (Lamport 1985, Appendix B). The first mention of BIBTEX in that book is at the bottom of page 72, where we find With LATEX, you can either produce the list of sources yourself or else use a separate program called BIBTEX to generate it from information contained in a bibliographic database.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Network Support for Transaction Triaging
    In-Network Support for Transaction Triaging Theo Jepsen Alberto Lerner Fernando Pedone Stanford University University of Fribourg Università della Svizzera italiana USA Switzerland Switzerland Robert Soulé Philippe Cudré-Mauroux Yale University University of Fribourg USA Switzerland ABSTRACT 0,#3#%/"*'&,$/4' &,#/3$:*'&,$/4' !"#$%&' ()*+$,-$, We introduce Transaction Triaging, a set of techniques that ma- ./,&#&#0%' nipulate streams of transaction requests and responses while they 1 2,03,/44/5"$ travel to and from a database server. Compared to normal transac- *6$&70,8 tion streams, the triaged ones execute faster once they reach the 1 &,/%'/9&#0%*&,#/3#%3*"03#9 database. The triaging algorithms do not interfere with the transac- tion execution nor require adherence to any particular concurrency &,/%'/9&#0% control method, making them easy to port across database systems. :/&/5/'$*./,&#&#0%' &;%*&<.$' Transaction Triaging leverages recent programmable network- ing hardware that can perform computations on in-fight data. We Figure 1: Transaction Triaging uses a programmable net- evaluate our techniques on an in-memory database system using work to rearrange transaction streams mid-fight. Triaged an actual programmable hardware network switch. Our experimen- streams incur less networking overhead and can be executed tal results show that triaging brings enough performance gains to with fewer server resources. compensate for almost all networking overheads. In high-overhead network stacks such as UDP/IP, we see throughput improvements one random core running the database, and not necessarily the from 2.05× to 7.95×. In an RDMA stack, the gains range from 1.08× core that should process that particular transaction. Moving the to 1.90× without introducing signifcant latency.
    [Show full text]