DOCSLIB.ORG

General Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Chapter -1 General Introduction Contents 1.1 Introduction - 1 1.2 The Vedic Period (10,000-8,000 BP) - 3 1.3 The Ramayana Period (8,000-7,000 BP) - 4 1.4 The Mahabharata Period (7,000-6,000 BP) - 4 1.5 The Indus Valley Civilization (5,000-4000 BP) - 5 1.6 Period of Social Transformation through Religion - 6 1.7 Period of Compilation of Ancient Hindu Scriptures - 6 1.8 Post-Buddha Period - 7 1.9 The Little Ice Age (LIA) - 7 1.10 A Brief History of Raingauge - 8 1.11 Instrumental Temperature Variations - 10 Reference - 14 Figures - 18 Chapter I General Introduction CHAPTER -1 General Introduction 1.1 Introduction Understanding the science of climate change and impact of rising trend in global tropospheric temperature on environment, hydrometeorological services and society are important problems of contemporary research. Fluctuation in global temperature has been relatively less (15°C±1.5°C) during the past 10,000 years (Holocene or the whole recent) compared to the earlier period since the land- atmosphere-water came into existence 4.1 billion years ago when it ranged between 22°C and 11 °C. But the small variation in temperature during the Holocene period drastically affected the cultural evolution of the human society of the Indian subcontinent (Singh and Ranade 2009). Climate refers to a mean state of the atmosphere considering intrinsic dynamics characterized by interannual variation, seasonal cycle and diurnal cycle. Climate change is defined as a significant change in climatic conditions (radiation, temperature, pressure, wind, cloud and precipitation) during a specific period compared to the preceding period capable of causing considerable impact on the settled ecosystem (vigor, vitality and type of natural and man-made ecosystems). Like the Earth, the Earth's climate has a history extending over -4.5 billion years. Processes in the atmosphere, oceans, cryosphere (snow cover, sea ice, and continental ice sheets), biosphere, and lithosphere (such as plate tectonics and volcanic activity) and certain extraterrestrial factors (such as the Sun) have caused these changes of climate. Thus, duration of climate change varies drastically from one scientific discipline to another. The climate change is gradual rather than abrupt and relative rather than absolute. Short period climatic changes are useful to understand changes in weather pattern. A provisional time-scale to gauge climate change in different scientific disciplines is, geological -106 years, geophysical -105 years, anthropological -104 years, archaeological -103 years, historical ~102 years, climatological -30 years, (hydro) meteorological -10 years and media and press few hours to few days (Singh et al. 2010b). The numerical value of the time scale is not 1 Chapter I Geiwi'al Inti•oduction the sharp boundary rather than length of the window-width, which can move one or two steps on both sides. Climate change research requires borrowing knowledge from subjects like geography, geology, geophysics, meteorology, climatology, hydrology, atmospheric sciences, agriculture, oceanography, remote sensing and geographic information system (RS-GIS), palaeo-climatology, palaeo-hydrology, anthropology, mythology, archaeology, history, economics, politics, psychology, religion, philosophy, spirituality, literature and, indology, though the list is not exhaustive (Singh et al. 2010 a&b). An overview of the impact of climatic change on evolution of humans in the Rift Valley (eastern Africa) around 2.5 million years ago, evolution of human society over Indian subcontinent in the past 10,000 years and human activities across India in recent few decades and years is in order. Evolution of Humans: Humans and human society have evolved in the backdrop of climatic changes. The human society is destined to live with worries for the future security of food, clothing, shelter, health, education, employment, economy, environment, communication and transportation. In the tropics, climate change refers to extreme climatic fluctuations between availability and non-availability of water. Further, concern of human beings for water is wide-ranging: divine-philosophical, chemical-biological, spiritual-religious, climatic-cultural, scientific-engineering (computational) and services-society. Adequate fresh water availability is essential for spiritual growth of human beings and healthy physical-material human society. Drastic and complicated spatial and temporal changes are expected in the general atmosphere and an Asia-India monsoon circulation as well as the availability of fresh water across the globe during the global warming scenario with a warming at a faster rate over the southern hemisphere (SH) than that of the northern hemisphere (NH). During dry climate spirituality, religion, philosophy, literature, peace, mercy, compassion and charity dominate the psyche of the people, and during the wet climate economics, power, politics, trade, wealth, commerce, insanity, looting, corruption, invasion and war. The humans were evolved from the Great Apes (chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans) due to occurrence of dry climate in the Rift Valley (East Africa) about 2.5 million years ago. During droughts, the Great Apes started walking by raising them on their two back legs in search of food. In due course, they could walk faster on two 2 Chapter I General Introduction legs and started migrating towards better habitation and food. Around 100,000 years before present, the modern looking man emerged in the Middle East. Besides hunting, the humans started collecting food grains from the wild. Down the line, the humans learnt the art of cultivating some wild plants to produce food grains, which marked the beginning of the Neolithic Culture, and a discovery in the human civilizing process. Earliest known sites of the Neolithic Culture are Levant (Jericho, Palestine) and Byblos (Lebanon) that go back to around 9,500BC to 9000BC, the 'Fertile Crescent' in the Middle East (semicircular area across northern part of the Syrian Desert and extending from the Nile Valley to the Tigris and Euphrates rivers) 9000 BC, the Mehrgarh Culture (Baluchistan, Pakistan) 7500 BC, the Pengtoushan Culture and the Peiligang Culture (East Asia) 7500BC to 5000BC and the Ganga plains (India) 7000 BC to 5000 BC. Evolution of Hitman Society in Indian Subcontinent: In the following, climatic changes over the past 10,000 years and cultural evolution of the Indian subcontinent are described (Archibald 2007; Dansgaard et al. 1969; Fagan 2009; Frawaley and Rajaram 2009; Radhakrislina 1999 a & b; Rigveda 1993; Saroj Bala 2003; Singh et al. 1974; Singh and Ranade 2009 and Tilak 1903). 1.2 The Vedic Period (10,000-8,000 BP) The first five mandalas (chapters) of the Rig Veda provide ample evidence that rivers flowed in northwestern India from snow-ice melt, and there was mention of clouds, rain, thunder and lightning in the remaining five mandalas. This type of climatic condition occurred prior to 8,000 BP that is during ending phase of the last glacial period and start of Holocene. The snow-ice melt-fed perennial Saraswati flowed from Shimla to Arabian Sea via Himachal Pradesh, Punjab-Haryana-Delhi, Rajasthan and Gujarat. At the time the humans started practicing agriculture, they had understanding that everything in existence was important to them. The people with spiritual knowledge enjoyed great respect in the society. The large masses opted for lifestyle conducive for spiritual knowledge; the guru-protege lineage, in which accumulated and new generated knowledge were described in refined language (Sanskrit Shlokas), and transferred orally from generation to generation. With this lifestyle, the human society lived in the Saraswati River basin for about 2,000 years (10,000-8,000 B.P.). Around 8,000 B.P., the snow-ice cover in lower-upper western 3 Chapter I General Introduction Himalaya exhausted due to warmer atmosphere (global annual surface air temperature {GASAT} > 15°C) and the Saraswati River desiccated to a dry channel. Sixteen shlokas in the Rig Veda provide vivid description of fluctuating behavior of the Vedic Saraswati: sometimes there were heavy floods, sometimes low flows, sometimes no flows and sometimes changes in its course. Further, freezing and melting of the Saraswati River also occurred during this period. 1.3 The Ramayana Period (8,000-7,000 BP) As the flow started diminishing in the Saraswati River, the people migrated towards east along the bank of the Ganges River and south (peninsula) while searching water bodies of fresh water e.g. rivers, lakes, streams etc. The GASAT was about 15°C, and the Asia-India monsoon was similar to present day - ample monsoon rainfall and moderate summer and winter seasons. Large masses of the people practiced agriculture. Recent archeological findings suggest that Neolithic Culture flourished in the Ganga plains during 9,000-7,000 BP, and there were cultivation of crops like rice, hulled barley, bread-wheat, dwarf-wheat, lentil, green-gram, grass- pea, field-pea, horse-gram, sesame, grape, common vetch and Job's tear (Pal 2008; Pokharia et al. 2009; Tewari et al. 2006). However, the lifestyle of the human society that evolved in the Indo-Gangetic Plains was different compared to that of the Vedic Period. Kishkindha Kanda of the Valmiki Ramayana in its 66 shlokas provides evidence that the Indian peninsula received ample rains when Indo-Gangetic Plains was relatively drier. Around 7,000 B.P., the GASAT became more than 15.5°C and there was a westward shift in 'heat low' (prime component of Asia-India Monsoon) from northwest India-Pakistan to Iran-Saudi Arabia and core rainfall activities from central India-and-Indo-Gangetic plains to northwestern India. The people started migrating towards west and the Ramayana Culture in the Indo-Gangetic plains started waning. 1.4 The Mahabharata Period (7,000-6,000 BP) During 7,000-6,000 BP, the NH temperature was higher than 16° C. The atmosphere was the hottest compared to other parts of the Holocene period and the summer monsoon was the wettest due to excessive heating of the dry and high lands of the southern and central Asia.
Recommended publications
  • Originally, the Descendants of Hua Xia Were Not the Descendants of Yan Huang

    Originally, the Descendants of Hua Xia Were Not the Descendants of Yan Huang

    E-Leader Brno 2019 Originally, the Descendants of Hua Xia were not the Descendants of Yan Huang Soleilmavis Liu, Activist Peacepink, Yantai, Shandong, China Many Chinese people claimed that they are descendants of Yan Huang, while claiming that they are descendants of Hua Xia. (Yan refers to Yan Di, Huang refers to Huang Di and Xia refers to the Xia Dynasty). Are these true or false? We will find out from Shanhaijing ’s records and modern archaeological discoveries. Abstract Shanhaijing (Classic of Mountains and Seas ) records many ancient groups of people in Neolithic China. The five biggest were: Yan Di, Huang Di, Zhuan Xu, Di Jun and Shao Hao. These were not only the names of groups, but also the names of individuals, who were regarded by many groups as common male ancestors. These groups first lived in the Pamirs Plateau, soon gathered in the north of the Tibetan Plateau and west of the Qinghai Lake and learned from each other advanced sciences and technologies, later spread out to other places of China and built their unique ancient cultures during the Neolithic Age. The Yan Di’s offspring spread out to the west of the Taklamakan Desert;The Huang Di’s offspring spread out to the north of the Chishui River, Tianshan Mountains and further northern and northeastern areas;The Di Jun’s and Shao Hao’s offspring spread out to the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River, where the Di Jun’s offspring lived in the west of the Shao Hao’s territories, which were near the sea or in the Shandong Peninsula.Modern archaeological discoveries have revealed the authenticity of Shanhaijing ’s records.
  • Adaptation and Invention During the Spread of Agriculture to Southwest China

    Adaptation and Invention During the Spread of Agriculture to Southwest China

    Adaptation and Invention during the Spread of Agriculture to Southwest China The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation D'Alpoim Guedes, Jade. 2013. Adaptation and Invention during the Spread of Agriculture to Southwest China. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11002762 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Adaptation and Invention during the Spread of Agriculture to Southwest China A dissertation presented by Jade D’Alpoim Guedes to The Department of Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Anthropology Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts March 2013 © 2013 – Jade D‘Alpoim Guedes All rights reserved Professor Rowan Flad (Advisor) Jade D’Alpoim Guedes Adaptation and Invention during the Spread of Agriculture to Southwest China Abstract The spread of an agricultural lifestyle played a crucial role in the development of social complexity and in defining trajectories of human history. This dissertation presents the results of research into how agricultural strategies were modified during the spread of agriculture into Southwest China. By incorporating advances from the fields of plant biology and ecological niche modeling into archaeological research, this dissertation addresses how humans adapted their agricultural strategies or invented appropriate technologies to deal with the challenges presented by the myriad of ecological niches in southwest China.
  • The Rise of Agricultural Civilization in China: the Disparity Between Archeological Discovery and the Documentary Record and Its Explanation

    The Rise of Agricultural Civilization in China: the Disparity Between Archeological Discovery and the Documentary Record and Its Explanation

    SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS Number 175 December, 2006 The Rise of Agricultural Civilization in China: The Disparity between Archeological Discovery and the Documentary Record and Its Explanation by Zhou Jixu Center for East Asian Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Chinese Department, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan Victor H. Mair, Editor Sino-Platonic Papers Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 USA [email protected] www.sino-platonic.org SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS is an occasional series edited by Victor H. Mair. The purpose of the series is to make available to specialists and the interested public the results of research that, because of its unconventional or controversial nature, might otherwise go unpublished. The editor actively encourages younger, not yet well established, scholars and independent authors to submit manuscripts for consideration. Contributions in any of the major scholarly languages of the world, including Romanized Modern Standard Mandarin (MSM) and Japanese, are acceptable. In special circumstances, papers written in one of the Sinitic topolects (fangyan) may be considered for publication. Although the chief focus of Sino-Platonic Papers is on the intercultural relations of China with other peoples, challenging and creative studies on a wide variety of philological subjects will be entertained. This series is not the place for safe, sober, and stodgy presentations. Sino-Platonic Papers prefers lively work that, while taking reasonable risks to advance the field, capitalizes on brilliant new insights into the development of civilization. The only style-sheet we honor is that of consistency. Where possible, we prefer the usages of the Journal of Asian Studies.
  • Early “Neolithics” of China: Variation and Evolutionary Implications

    Early “Neolithics” of China: Variation and Evolutionary Implications

    Boise State University ScholarWorks Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of Anthropology Summer 2017 Early “Neolithics” of China: Variation and Evolutionary Implications Shengqian Chen Renmin University of China Pei-Lin Yu Boise State University This document was originally published by University of Chicago Press in Journal of Anthropological Research. Copyright restrictions may apply. doi: 10.1086/692104 Early “Neolithics” of China: Variation and Evolutionary Implications SHENGQIAN CHEN, School of History, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872 PEI-LIN YU, Department of Anthropology, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA. Email: [email protected] The growth and significance of scientific research into the origins of agriculture in China calls for fresh examination at scales large enough to facilitate explanation of cultural evolutionary processes. The Paleolithic to Neolithic transition (PNT) is not yet well-understood because most archaeo- logical research on early agriculture cites data from the more conspicuous and common early Neo- lithic sites. In this, the first of two papers, we synthesize a broad range of early Neolithic archae- ological data, including diagnostic artifacts, settlement patterns, site structure, and biological remains, to consider agriculture as a system-level adaptive phenomenon. Although farming by this period was already well-established in much of North China and the middle Yangtze River basin, echoes of the foraging past can be found in the persistence of hunting-related artifacts in North China’s Loess Plateau and aquatic-based intensification and vegeculture in South China. Our analysis of the growing body of Chinese data and projections using Binford’s hunting and gathering database indicate that agriculture was differentially developed, adopted, or resisted by foragers according to measurable, predictable initial conditions of habitat that influenced diet breadth.
  • The Occurrence of Cereal Cultivation in China

    The Occurrence of Cereal Cultivation in China

    The Occurrence of Cereal Cultivation in China TRACEY L-D LU NEARL Y EIGHTY YEARS HAVE ELAPSED since Swedish scholar J. G. Andersson discovered a piece of rice husk on a Yangshao potsherd found in the middle Yel­ low River Valley in 1927 (Andersson 1929). Today, many scholars agree that China 1 is one of the centers for an indigenous origin of agriculture, with broom­ corn and foxtail millets and rice being the major domesticated crops (e.g., Craw-· ford 2005; Diamond and Bellwood 2003; Higham 1995; Smith 1995) and dog and pig as the primary animal domesticates (Yuan 2001). It is not clear whether chicken and water buffalo were also indigenously domesticated in China (Liu 2004; Yuan 2001). The origin of agriculture in China by no later than 9000 years ago is an impor­ tant issue in prehistoric archaeology. Agriculture is the foundation of Chinese civ­ ilization. Further, the expansion of agriculture in Asia might have related to the origin and dispersal of the Austronesian and Austroasiatic speakers (e.g., Bellwood 2005; Diamond and Bellwood 2003; Glover and Higham 1995; Tsang 2005). Thus the issue is essential for our understanding of Asian and Pacific prehistory and the origins of agriculture in the world. Many scholars have discussed various aspects regarding the origin of agriculture in China, particularly after the 1960s (e.g., Bellwood 1996, 2005; Bellwood and Renfrew 2003; Chen 1991; Chinese Academy of Agronomy 1986; Crawford 1992, 2005; Crawford and Shen 1998; Flannery 1973; Higham 1995; Higham and Lu 1998; Ho 1969; Li and Lu 1981; Lu 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002; MacN eish et al.
  • The Neolithic Ofsouthern China-Origin, Development, and Dispersal

    The Neolithic Ofsouthern China-Origin, Development, and Dispersal

    The Neolithic ofSouthern China-Origin, Development, and Dispersal ZHANG CHI AND HSIAO-CHUN HUNG INTRODUCTION SANDWICHED BETWEEN THE YELLOW RIVER and Mainland Southeast Asia, southern China1 lies centrally within eastern Asia. This geographical area can be divided into three geomorphological terrains: the middle and lower Yangtze allu­ vial plain, the Lingnan (southern Nanling Mountains)-Fujian region,2 and the Yungui Plateau3 (Fig. 1). During the past 30 years, abundant archaeological dis­ coveries have stimulated a rethinking of the role ofsouthern China in the prehis­ tory of China and Southeast Asia. This article aims to outline briefly the Neolithic cultural developments in the middle and lower Yangtze alluvial plain, to discuss cultural influences over adjacent regions and, most importantly, to examine the issue of southward population dispersal during this time period. First, we give an overview of some significant prehistoric discoveries in south­ ern China. With the discovery of Hemudu in the mid-1970s as the divide, the history of archaeology in this region can be divided into two phases. The first phase (c. 1920s-1970s) involved extensive discovery, when archaeologists un­ earthed Pleistocene human remains at Yuanmou, Ziyang, Liujiang, Maba, and Changyang, and Palaeolithic industries in many caves. The major Neolithic cul­ tures, including Daxi, Qujialing, Shijiahe, Majiabang, Songze, Liangzhu, and Beiyinyangying in the middle and lower Yangtze, and several shell midden sites in Lingnan, were also discovered in this phase. During the systematic research phase (1970s to the present), ongoing major ex­ cavation at many sites contributed significantly to our understanding of prehis­ toric southern China. Additional early human remains at Wushan, Jianshi, Yun­ xian, Nanjing, and Hexian were recovered together with Palaeolithic assemblages from Yuanmou, the Baise basin, Jianshi Longgu cave, Hanzhong, the Li and Yuan valleys, Dadong and Jigongshan.
  • The Spread of Agriculture in Eastern Asia Archaeological Bases for Hypothetical Farmer/Language Dispersals

    The Spread of Agriculture in Eastern Asia Archaeological Bases for Hypothetical Farmer/Language Dispersals

    Language Dynamics and Change 7 (2017) 152–186 brill.com/ldc The spread of agriculture in eastern Asia Archaeological bases for hypothetical farmer/language dispersals Chris J. Stevens University College, London [email protected] Dorian Q Fuller University College, London [email protected] Abstract Millets and rice were important for the demographic history of China. This review draws on current archaeobotanical evidence for rice and millets across China, Korea, eastern Russia, Taiwan, Mainland southeast Asia, and Japan, taking a critical approach to dating evidence, evidence for cultivation, and morphological domestication.There is no evidence to suggest that millets and rice were domesticated simultaneously within a single region. Instead, 5 regions of north China are candidates for independent early cultivation of millets that led to domestication, and 3 regions of the Yangtze basin are candidates for separate rice domestication trajectories. The integration of rice and millet into a single agricultural system took place ca. 4000bc, and after this the spread of agricultural systems and population growth are in evidence. The most striking evidence for agricultural dispersal and population growth took place between 3000 and 2500bc, which has implications for major language dispersals. Keywords East Asian agriculture – millet – rice – archaeobotany – domestication – agricultural dispersal © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2017 | doi: 10.1163/22105832-00702001Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 08:22:12PM via free access the spread of agriculture in eastern asia 153 1 Introduction The origins and spread of millets and rice, the major staples of ancient China, have implications regarding the development and spread of cultures, language groups and ethnic groups across eastern Asia (Bellwood, 2005; Blench, 2005; Sagart, 2008; Robbeets, 2015).
  • Evidence for a Late Onset of Agriculture in the Lower Yangtze Region and Challenges for an Archaeobotany of Rice

    Evidence for a Late Onset of Agriculture in the Lower Yangtze Region and Challenges for an Archaeobotany of Rice

    Forthcoming In: A. Sanchez-Mazas, R. Blench, M. Ross, M. Lin & I. Pejros (ed.) Human migrations in continental East Asia and Taiwan: genetic, linguistic and archaeological evidence. London: Taylor & Francis Likely publication date 2007. Evidence for a late onset of agriculture in the Lower Yangtze region and challenges for an archaeobotany of rice Dorian Q Fuller1, Ling Qin2, Emma Harvey1 1. Institute of Archaeology. University College London 2. School of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University, Beijing Introduction The origins of agriculture represents a particularly important transition in human prehistory. By producing food through cultivating plants, and to a lesser degree by herding animals, it became possible to store surpluses which could support larger settled populations (sedentism and increased population density), and specialist occupations (non-food producers). With agriculture was created the potential for much greater rates of population increase. The demographic differentiation between the idealized early farmer and hunter- gatherer has been a fundamental assumption for many powerful models of prehistoric population change, genetic change, and language spread (e.g. Bellwood 2005). Within this context, rice agriculture is usually assumed to be an essential factor underlying the Holocene migrations that are supposed to have created cultural geography of much of China as well as Southeast Asia (e.g. Bellwood 2005; Higham 2003). The hard evidence for the timing, geography, and evolutionary processes involved in the establishment of rice agriculture is, however, rather limited and ambiguous. Such evidence will be crucial to any story of agricultural origins and dispersal in East Asia. This paper considers an alternative hypothesis, the late domestication of rice, which sees much of the evidence for early rice as reflecting foraging and a long period of incipient cultivation of still wild plants.
  • Front Matter

    Front Matter

    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-64310-8 - Cambridge World Archaeology: The Archaeology of China: From the Late Paleolithic to the Early Bronze Age Li Liu and Xingcan Chen Frontmatter More information THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF CHINA This book explores the roles of agricultural development and advanc- ing social complexity in the processes of state formation in China. Over a period of about 10,000 years, it follows evolutionary trajectories of society from the last Paleolithic hunting-gathering groups, through Neolithic farming villages, and on to the Bronze Age Shang dynasty in the latter half of the second millennium BC. Li Liu and Xingcan Chen demonstrate that sociopolitical evolution was multicentric and shaped by interpolity factionalism and competition, as well as by the many material technologies introduced from other parts of the world. The book illustrates how ancient Chinese societies were transformed during this period from simple to complex, tribal to urban, and preliterate to literate. Li Liu is Sir Robert Ho Tung Professor in Chinese Archaeology in the Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures at Stanford University. She is the author of two books, The Chinese Neolithic: Trajectories to Early States and (with Xingcan Chen) State Formation in Early China,aswell as more than seventy journal articles in both English and Chinese. Xingcan Chen is Senior Fellow and Deputy Director of the Institute of Archaeology at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences as well as Professor in the Department of Archaeology, Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. He is the author of numerous articles and books, including The History of Chinese Prehistoric Archaeology (1895– 1949), Essays on Archaeology, and (with Li Liu) State Formation in Early China.
  • Ancient Dnas and the Neolithic Chinese Super-Grandfather Y

    Ancient Dnas and the Neolithic Chinese Super-Grandfather Y

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/487918; this version posted December 5, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 1 Ancient DNAs and the Neolithic Chinese super-grandfather Y haplotypes 2 3 Ye Zhang1, Xiaoyun Lei1, Hongyao Chen1, Hui Zhou2* and Shi Huang1* 4 5 6 1Center for Medical Genetics, Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, 7 Changsha, Hunan 410078, People’s Republic of China 8 9 2Ancient DNA Laboratory, Research Center for Chinese Frontier Archaeology, Jinlin 10 University, Changchun 130012 11 12 *Corresponding authors: 13 Shi Huang ([email protected]) 14 Hui Zhou ([email protected]) 15 16 Keywords: Yangshao Culture, Miaodigou Culture, Banpo Culture, Hongshan Culture, 17 Xiajiadian Culture, O2a2b1a1a-F5, O2a1c1a1a1a-F11, ancient DNA 18 19 Running title: Ancient DNAs and the Neolithic Chinese super-grandfather Y 20 haplotypes 21 22 23 Abstract 24 Previous studies identified 3 Neolithic Han Chinese super-grandfather Y 25 haplotypes, O2a2b1a1a-F5, O2a2b1a2a1-F46, and O2a1b1a1a1a-F11, but their 26 relationships with the archaeological and written records remain unexplored. We here 27 report genome wide DNA data for 12 ancient samples (0.02x-1.28x) from China 28 ranging from 6500 to 2500 years before present (YBP). They belonged to 4 different 29 genetic groups, designated as Dashanqian (DSQ) of Xiajiadian Culture in the 30 Northeast, Banpo (BP) of middle Yangshao Culture in the Central West, Zhengzhou 31 Xishan (ZX) of Miaodigou Culture in the Central Plains, and Others.

  • The Spread of Agriculture in Eastern Asia Archaeological Bases for Hypothetical Farmer/Language Dispersals

    Language Dynamics and Change 7 (2017) 152–186 brill.com/ldc The spread of agriculture in eastern Asia Archaeological bases for hypothetical farmer/language dispersals Chris J. Stevens University College, London [email protected] Dorian Q Fuller University College, London [email protected] Abstract Millets and rice were important for the demographic history of China. This review draws on current archaeobotanical evidence for rice and millets across China, Korea, eastern Russia, Taiwan, Mainland southeast Asia, and Japan, taking a critical approach to dating evidence, evidence for cultivation, and morphological domestication.There is no evidence to suggest that millets and rice were domesticated simultaneously within a single region. Instead, 5 regions of north China are candidates for independent early cultivation of millets that led to domestication, and 3 regions of the Yangtze basin are candidates for separate rice domestication trajectories. The integration of rice and millet into a single agricultural system took place ca. 4000bc, and after this the spread of agricultural systems and population growth are in evidence. The most striking evidence for agricultural dispersal and population growth took place between 3000 and 2500bc, which has implications for major language dispersals. Keywords East Asian agriculture – millet – rice – archaeobotany – domestication – agricultural dispersal © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2017 | doi: 10.1163/22105832-00702001Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 02:24:17PM via free access the spread of agriculture in eastern asia 153 1 Introduction The origins and spread of millets and rice, the major staples of ancient China, have implications regarding the development and spread of cultures, language groups and ethnic groups across eastern Asia (Bellwood, 2005; Blench, 2005; Sagart, 2008; Robbeets, 2015).
  • THE ORIGINS of AGRICULTURE: NEW DATA, Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas

    THE ORIGINS of AGRICULTURE: NEW DATA, Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas

    Forthcoming Current Anthropology Wenner-Gren Symposium Curren Supplementary Issues (in order of appearance) t e Biological Anthropology of Modern Human Populations: World Anthropolog Current Histories, National Styles, and International Networks. Mary Susan Lindee and Ricardo Ventura Santos, eds. Human Biology and the Origins of Homo. Susan Antón and Leslie C. Aiello, Anthropology eds. y THE WENNER-GREN SYMPOSIUM SERIES Previously Published Supplementary Issues October THE ORIGINS OF AGRICULTURE: NEW DATA, Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas. Setha M. Low and Sally NEW IDEAS 2 Engle Merry, eds. 01 1 V GUEST EDITORS: Working Memory: Beyond Language and Symbolism. omas Wynn and T. DOUGLAS PRICE AND OFER BAR-YOSEF Frederick L. Coolidge, eds. The Origins of Agriculture olum Corporate Lives: New Perspectives on the Social Life of the Corporate Form. Climatic Fluctuations and Early Farming in West and East Asia Damani Partridge, Marina Walker, and Rebecca Hardin, eds. e 52 Neolithization Processes in the Levant Becoming Farmers The Origins of Agriculture in the Near East The Neolithic Southwest Asian Founder Crops Supplement The Early Process of Mammal Domestication in the Near East The Beginnings of Agriculture in China New Archaeobotanic Data for Origins of Agriculture in China The Transition from Foraging to Farming in Prehistoric Korea Advances in Understanding Early Agriculture in Japan 4 Finding Plant Domestication in the Indian Subcontinent Holocene Population Prehistory in the Pacific Region Current Anthropology is sponsored by e Early Agriculture and Plant Domestication in Island Southeast Asia Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Domestication Processes and Morphological Change Research, a foundation endowed for scientific, Westward Expansion of Farming from Anatolia to the Balkans educational, and charitable purposes.