<<

European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 1999; 3: 27-30 Review – treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: rifaximin, a new possible approach

P. GIONCHETTI, F. RIZZELLO, A. VENTURI, F. UGOLINI*, M. ROSSI**, P. BRIGIDI**, R. JOHANSSON, A. FERRIERI***, G. POGGIOLI*, M. CAMPIERI

Clinica Medica I, Nuove Patologie, Bologna University (Italy) *Istituto di Clinica Chirurgica II, Bologna University (Italy) **Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Bologna University (Italy) ***Direzione Medica Alfa Wassermann, Bologna (Italy)

Abstract. – The etiology of inflammatory ported the presence of a breakdown of toler- disease is still unknown, but a body of evidence ance to the normal commensal intestinal flora from clinical and experimental observation indi- in active IBD2-3. Reduction of microflora by cates a role for intestinal microflora in the pathogenesis of this disease. Reduction of mi- , bowel rest and fecal diversion de- croflora using antibiotics, bowel rest and fecal creases inflammatory activity in Crohn’s dis- diversion decreases activity in Crohn’s disease ease and to a lesser extent in ulcerative colitis and in ulcerative colitis. Several trials have been (UC). The pathogenetic role of intestinal mi- carried out on the use of antibiotic treatment in croflora is further suggested by the observa- patients with active ulcerative colitis with con- tion that experimental colitis, in germ-free or trasting results. A number of trials have been antibiotic treated animals, is less severe com- carried out using Rifaximin, a non-absorbable broad-spectrum antibiotic, confirming the ab- pared to that inducible in normal animals or sence of systemic bioavalaibility of the drug at times is not inducible at all. Moreover, bac- even when administered at very high doses and terial products, such as N-formil-methionyl- for prolonged periods. It may therefore be useful leucyil-phenylalanine (FMLP), lipopolysac- in treatment of ulcerative colitis and pouchitis, charidase (LPS) and peptidoglycan-polysac- since its absorption through inflamed mucosa is charidase (LPS), can induce and perpetuate negligible, it maintains a topical action without 4-8 systemic effects and the lack of resistant bacte- experimental colitis . rial strains may allow prolonged and repeated Pouchitis, a non-specific inflammation of treatments. the ileal reservoir (pouch) mucosa, is the ma- Key Words: jor long-term complication encountered after proctocolectomy and ileo-anal anastomosis Rifaximin, Antibiotic, IBD, Ulcerative colitis. for UC. The etiology and pathophysiology of pouchitis are not well understood, and a vari- ety of hypotheses have been proposed to ex- plain this inflammatory condition. Among this, a major role has been attributed to fecal Introduction stasis and bacterial overgrowth, recurrent UC, misdiagnosed Crohn’s disease and mucosal is- The ethiology of inflammatory bowel dis- chemia of the pouch9. However, pouchitis ease (IBD) remains unknown, but a body of most likely seems to be the result of a com- evidence from clinical and experimental ob- plex interaction between a genetical or im- servations indicates a pathogenetic role munological susceptibility of the patient and among others for intestinal microflora1. The the morphological and functional modifica- distal ileum and the colon are the areas with tions of the ileal-pouch, due to the fecal stasis the highest intraluminal bacterial concentra- and consequent bacterial overgrowth10-11. tion, and represent the sites of primary in- Several trials have been carried-out on the flammation in IBD. Recent studies have re- use of antibiotic treatment in patients with ac-

27 P. Gionchetti, F. Rizzello, A. Venturi, F. Ugolini, M. Rossi, P. Brigidi, R. Johansson et al tive UC, with contrasting results. Intravenous ative, aerobic and anaerobic species associat- was not found to be superior ed with gastro-intestinal infection17-18. to placebo when used in association with cor- Resistance to rifaximin has been demon- ticosteroids in severe UC12, while oral van- strated to occur either in vitro and in vivo in comicyn showed a certain efficacy, that how- residual intestinal flora; drug resistance how- ever did not reach statistical significance13. ever decreases rapidly after the end of the Favorable results have been obtained with treatment, and disappeares completely after 1 tobramicyn, an active against to 2 weeks for anaerobic cocci, enterococci Gram negative bacteria, administered togeth- and Enterobacteriacee, and after 8 to 16 er with standard steroid treatment; 74% of weeks for Clostridium and Bacteroides patients achieved a complete symptomatic re- species. Therefore it appears that rifaximin mission compared with only 43% in the place- resistant strains are unable to permanently bo treated group14. However, a more recent colonize the gastro-intestinal tract19. trial with cyprofloxacin has not been able to Several experimental and clinical observa- demonstrate a favourable effect of antibiotic tions have shown that rifaximin is virtually treatment when compared to placebo15. not absorbed. Recent experiments with Treatment of pouchitis remains empirical, 14C-rifaximin performed in rat and dog mod- and antibiotics are the mainstay of therapeu- els showed that, after intravenous administra- tic regimens; metronidazole is the most com- tion, plasma levels were detectable for 4 and mon administered first-line antibiotic, and 12 hours respectively, whereas after oral ad- most patients show remission of clinical ministration, serum radiolabelled product symptons within a few days. One double- levels were very low and detectable only for 1 blind, placebo-controlled study utilizing and 6 hours, respectively. Following oral ad- metronidazole showed a significant reduction ministration in rats, after 48 hours the excre- of bowel motions however without improve- tion of radioactivity in urine was about 0.7% ment of endoscopic appearance of the in- of the dose, whereas in faeces the radiola- flammed intestinal tract or of the histological belled product was found in quantities that inflammatory activity16. Other antibacterial reached 90% or more of the oral dose; simi- agents that have shown some positive results lar results were observed in dogs. Following are , the association of amoxi- intravenous administration in dogs, within cyllin+clavulanic acid, and ery- 24/48 hours most of the radioactivity was ex- thromycin. creted in faeces (83% dose), whereas urinary No attempt has been made to compare was about 6% of the administered metronidazole with other therapeutic regi- dose; 168 hours after administration, radioac- mens. About 15% of patients with pouchitis tivity was totally excreted in faeces, possibly present a chronic inflammatory condition. In as a consequence of enterohepatic circulation same cases, this inflammation is treatment-re- of 14C-rifaximin or its metabolites20. sponsive and requires maintainance metron- Blood levels in healthy volunteers, after idazole therapy with a high incidence of side single oral administration of a dose of 400 effects (dysgeusic nausea and peripheral neu- mL, were undetectable in 50% of volunteers ropathy). In other cases pouchitis shows no and below 5 ng/mL in the other 50%, using response to antibiotic-treatment and is de- techniques with detection limit of 2 ng/mL. fined as treatment-resistant. After 48 hours, urinary recovery of the drug Rifaximin is a non-absorbable antibiotic. did not exceed 0.025% of the administered Its mechanism of action is based on the inhi- dose (unpublished observation). bition of prokaryotic RNA-polymerase. The More recently, in one study which investi- inhibition of this enzyme suppresses initiation gated the systemic absorption of rifaximin af- of chain formation during RNA synthesis. ter single oral administration of 400 mg, in The drug has bactericidal rather than bacte- patients with mild to moderate ulcerative col- riostatic property having a low ratio between itis, urinary excretion was found to be negligi- bactericidal and inhibitory activity (1:1 to 4:1 ble, and plasma concentration was unde- in susceptible strains)17. It shares the same tectable in almost all patients21. antibacterial spectrum with other , Largely variable amounts of rifaximin have covering all the main Gram positive and neg- been recovered in faeces, depending on mass

28 Review – Antibiotic treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: rifaximin of the faeces and transit time. In some cases the absence of the drug in any at the plasma up to 76% of the administered dose could be samples 12 hrs after from the last dose, and recovered in faeces in 24 hours. Therefore, the presence of negligible levels of the un- independently from its poor absorption, ri- changed active principle in 24 hrs urine sam- faximin is not distributed at a systemic level ples. These data further confirm the absence but undergoes a first pass removal by the liv- of systemic of the drug even er and its behaviour is like SV, when administered at very high dosage (2 which does not show any systemic absorp- g/day) and for a prolonged period27. tion, remaining in the enterohepatic circula- It is possible to conclude that rifaximin tion, and being subsequently almost totally may be useful in treatment of ulcerative coli- excreted in faeces. tis and pouchitis; its absorption through in- Rifaximin has been used successfully in the flamed mucosa is negligible as in normal mu- treatment of , acute in- cosa. The drug maintains a topical action fectious diarrheal disease, preparation for without systemic effects. The absence of re- colonic and biliary surgery and diverticulitis22-25. sistant bacterial strains, able to permanently Because of its broad spectrum and its colonize the gastro-intestinal tract, may allow mainly topical activity, we recently conducted prolonged and repeated treatment cycles. a pilot placebo-controlled study in a group of patients with severe UC refractory to steroid treatment using rifaximin as an adjunct to standard steroid treatment. References Fourteen patients received rifaximin (800 mg/day) and 14 received an identical placebo. 1) SARTOR RB. Role of intestinal microflora in initiation Overall nine patients (64.3%) receiving rifax- and perpetuation of inflammatory bowel disease. Can J Gastroent 1990; 4: 271-277. imin and five (41.7%) (p NS) receiving place- bo showed a positive response to the treat- 2) DUCHMANN R, KAISER I, HERMANN E et al. Tolerance exists towards resident intestinal flora but is bro- ment, as defined by an improvement of the ken in active inflammatory bowel disease. Clin disease’s clinical activity from baseline to the Exp Immunol 1995; 102: 448-455. th l0 day, and tapered steroids gradually. 3) MACPERSON A, KHOO UY, FORGACS I et al. Mucosal Moreover rifaximin determined a significant antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease are di- reduction in stool frequency (p<0.02), rectal rected against intestinal bacteria. Gut 1996; 38: bleeding (p<0.05) and sigmoidoscopic score 365-375 (p<0.01) compared with placebo. Twelve 4) CHADWICK VS, ANDERSON RP. Microorganism and hours after the last dose of rifaximin, it was their products in inflammatory bowel disease. In: not possible to identify the drug in any of the Mc Dermott RP, Stenson WF (eds.) Inflammatory bowel disease. Elsevier, New York 1992, pp plasma samples (2 ng/mL was the detection 241-258. limit of the analytical method). The total 5) SARTOR RB (1992). Animal models of intestinal in- amount of rifaximin excretion in 24-hrs urine flammation: Relevance in IBD. In: Mc Dermott after 10 days was 64,617.14 ± 20,976.57 ng/mL RP, Stenson WIF (eds.) Inflammatory bowel dis- (mean±SEM)26. These findings suggest that ease. Elsevier, New York 1992, pp 337-354 rifaximin may be useful in patients with 6) DAVIS SW, HOLT LC, SARTOR RB. Luminal bacteria and steroid refractory UC. More recently we uti- bacterial polymers potentiate indomethacin- in- lized rifaximin (1 g b.d.) in association with duced intestinal injury in the rat. Gastroenterology ciprofloxacin (500 mg b.d.), given for 15 days, 1990; 98; 444A. in patients with chronic, antibiotic-resistant 7) CHESTER JF, ROSS JS, MALT RA et al. Acute colitis pouchitis. Eighteen patients, who failed to re- produced by chemotactic peptides in rats and mices. Am J Pathol 1985; 121: 284-290. spond to metronidazole as well as to other commonly used treatments for pouchitis, en- 8) VON RITTER C, SEKIZUKA E, GRISHAM MB et al. The chemotactic peptide N-formylmethionyl-leucyl- tered the study. Sixteen of 18 treated patients phenylalanine increases mucosal permeability in (88.8%) either improved (n=10) or went into the distal ileum of the rat. Gastroenterology 1988; remission (n=6), with a decrease of the medi- 95: 651-656. an Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) 9) SANDBOM WJ. Pouchitis following ileal pouch-anal score from 12 (range 8-17) to 4 (range 0-16). anastomosis: Definition, pathogenesis, and treat- Pharmacokinetic study of rifaximin showed ment. Gastroenterology 1994; 107: 1856-60.

29 P. Gionchetti, F. Rizzello, A. Venturi, F. Ugolini, M. Rossi, P. Brigidi, R. Johansson et al

10) KMIOT WA, YOUNGS D, TUDOR R. Mucosal morphol- new topical rifamycin derivative. Diagn Microbiol ogy, cell proliferation and faecal bacteriology in Infect Dis 1993; 16: 111-118. acute pouchitis. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 1445-1449. 19) DE LEO C, EFTIMIADI C, SCHITO. Rapid dissapearance 11) SANDBORN WJ, TREMAINE WJ, BATTS KL et at. Faecal from intestinal tract of bacteria resistant to rifax- bile acids, short chain fatty acid, and bacteria af- imin. Drugs Explt Clin Res 1986; 12: 979- 981. ter ileal pouch-anal anastomosis do not differ in 20) Huntington Life Sciences (1997). The absorption, patients with pouchitis. Dig Dis Sci 1995; 40: distribution and excretion of 14C-rifaximin follow- 1474-1483. ing the administration of single oral or intra- 12) CHAPMAN RW, SELBY WS, JEWELL. Controlled trial of venous doses in the rat and dog. Internal Report. intravenous metronidazole as an adjunt to corti- costeroids in severe ulcerative colitis. Gut 1986; 21) RIZZELLO F, GIONCHETTI P, VENTURI A, et at. Rifaximin 27: 1210-1212. systemic absorption in patients with ulcerative colitis. Eur J Clinic Pharmacol 1998;54:91-93. 13) DICKINSON RJ, O’CONNOR HJ, PINDER I, et al. Double blind controlled trial of oral as ad- 22) DU PONT BL, EDCSSOB CD. Prevention and treat- junctive treatment in acute exacerbations of idio- ment of travellers diarrhea. N Engl J Med 1993; pathic colitis. Gut 1985; 26:1380-1384. 328: 1821-1827.

14) MANTZARIS GJ, HATZIS A, KONTOGIANNIS P et al. 23) PORTA E, GERMANO A, KOCH M, FERRIERI A. The nat- Intravenous tobramycin and metronidazole as ural history of diverticular disease of the colon: a an adjunct to in acute, severe ul- role for antibiotics in preventing complications? A cerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 1: retrospective study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 43-46. 1994; 16: 33-39.

15) MANTZARIS GJ, ARCHAVLIS E, CHRISTOFORIDIS P, 24) FESTI D, MAZZELLA G, ORSINI M, et al. Rifaximin in KOURTESSAS D, AMBERIADIS PFLORAKIS N, KAL PETRAKI, the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy. SPILIADI CH, TRIANTAFYLLOU G. A prospective ran- Curr Ther Res 1993; 54: 598-609. domized controlled trial of oral cyprofloxacin in 25) CORAZZA GR, VENTRUCCI M, STROCCHI A, et al. acute ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; Treatment of bacterial overgrowth 92: 454-456. with rifamixi, a non absorbable rifamycin. J Int 16) MADDEN M, MCINTYRE A, NICHOLIS RJ, ET AL. Double Med Res 1988; 16: 312-316. blind cross over trial of metronidazole versus 26) GIONCHETTI P, RIZZELLO F, FERRIERI A, et al. Rifaximin placebo in chronic unremitting pouchitis. Dig Dis in patients with moderate or severe ulcerative col- Sci 1994; 39: 1193-1196. itis refractory to steroid-treatment: a double-blind, 17) TESTA R, EFTIMIADI C, SUKKAR GS et al. A non-ab- placebo-controlled trial. Dig Dis Sci 1999; 13: sorbable rifamycin for treatment of hepatic en- 713-718. cephalopathy. Drugs Explt Clin Res 1985; 11: 27) GIONCHETTI P, RIZZELLO F, VENTURI A, et al. Antibiotic 387-392. association in patients with chronic, treatment-re- 18) HOOVER WW, GERIACH EH, HOBAN DJ ET AL. sistant pouchitis. Gastroenterology 1997; Antimicrobial activity and spectrum of rifaximin, a 113(suppl 3): A981.

30