DOCSLIB.ORG

This Week's Driving Events

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Week's Driving Events September 21-25, 2020 This Week's Driving Events RBG's Death a Catalyst on the Left and Right: After the death on Friday of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, President Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) are full steam ahead in filling her seat. A nominee is expected this week, with the top two contenders being Judges Amy Coney Barrett and Barbara Lagoa. The odds are in the GOP's favor for a nominee to be confirmed before the end of the year, with serious implications for outstanding Supreme Court cases and what Democrats would do if they win unified control of government. Powell's Talk is Getting Cheaper: Federal Reserve Board Chair Jay Powell will testify three times on Capitol Hill this week. The Fed's actions at the start of the pandemic went a long way in stabilizing the markets and boosting liquidity, but the politically astute Powell has fewer options in his toolkit to help the recovery in the near term, leaving it up to Congress to pass more fiscal relief. With Vaccine Development Ongoing, Distribution and Cooperation Challenges Loom: With the pandemic ongoing and new hot spots emerging around the country and on college campuses, the Trump administration remains focused on developing a vaccine and continues to release guidance and plans for the yet-to-be approved shot(s). While planning is necessary as distributing a vaccine requires deep coordination and logistical planning, friction has already developed between states and the federal government as the challenges of politicization and vaccine hesitancy linger. RBG'S DEATH IS EARTH (BUT MAYBE NOT ELECTION) SHATTERING: Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died on Friday. Fondly (and notoriously) called RBG, she was the most iconic justice for progressives. Not since the death of President Kennedy has a passing rocked the foundations of American politics and society. This may sound hyperbolic, but the implications are hard to overstate. The reverberations may be far reaching for the election, the markets, and our governing institutions. But first things first, can President Trump nominate and Senate Republicans confirm a new Supreme Court justice? Ginsburg's death 46 days before November 3rd is the closest a Supreme Court seat opened up before Election Day since 1864 (a nomination wasn't announced and confirmed until after the 1864 election). On average, it takes about 70 days for a final Senate vote after someone is nominated. Today marks 43 days until Election Day and 104 days until the 117th Congress is sworn in on January 3rd. It's an unprecedented vacancy and there is a clear hypocrisy from Senate Republicans who denied President Obama his nominee, Merrick Garland, in 2016 from a hearing or a vote during an election year. But hypocrisy has little power in DC. Right now, we wouldn't bet against Republicans getting a nominee confirmed, even before the election. This is Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-KY) moment, more so than the other confirmation battles under his leadership. It's one thing for getting Neil Gorsuch confirmed for Antonin Scalia's seat and Brett Kavanaugh confirmed for Anthony Kennedy's seat. But the ideological distance between Ginsburg and a conservative nominee will be vast. He has the opportunity to switch a seat on the Supreme Court from staunchly progressive to conservative, thereby instilling a 6-3 conservative majority that could last for decades. As long-time DC reporter Paul Kane noted, McConnell has two overarching goals in life: a Senate Republican majority and a conservative judiciary. But this is a moment where those goals may come into conflict. Pushing for a confirmation now could jeopardize Republican incumbents like Senators Cory Gardner (R-CO) and Susan Collins (R- ME), and thus, the Senate majority. However, the lasting legacy of a conservative Supreme Court may be worth the price of losing a Senate majority for McConnell. For Trump, a conservative court doesn't matter one iota for him in and of itself. But it matters a great deal for him as he sees coalescing his base as the key to winning reelection. To that end, Trump is expected to announce his nomination this week. At a campaign rally in North Carolina on Saturday, Trump said, "I will be putting forth a nominee next week, it will be a woman." The top two contenders are believed to be Judges Amy Coney Barrett of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago and Barbara Lagoa of the 11th Circuit in Atlanta. Barrett is a favorite among religious conservatives. She once said "Your legal career is but a means to an end, and. ...that end is building the kingdom of God." Trump once said he was "saving her for Ginsburg." Her Appeals Court confirmation in 2017 was along party lines, with Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) as the only current Democrat voting for her. Lagoa plays to Trump's penchant for winning Florida. She is a conservative Cuban-American from Miami. She was confirmed to her current seat last year in a broad bipartisan vote. Once Trump announces his nomination this week, the wheels will be set in motion to set up a hearing with the Senate Judiciary Committee and then to line up a vote. With 53 seats, McConnell can afford to lose three Republican votes (although, there's a remote possibility that the margin for error is just two as 51 senators are required for a quorum of the Senate to confirm a nominee if the GOP opposition decides to play hardball, which we view as unlikely). Right now, Senators Collins and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) are opposed to voting on a nominee. But that still leaves McConnell with a two-vote margin. The other two to watch are Senator Mitt Romney (R-UT) and Senator Cory Gardner (R-CO). Romney sees himself as the anti-Trump institutionalist of the party. However, this is less of a Trump issue; this is being pushed by conservatives and the Republican Party writ-large, two groups where he firmly belongs and does not feel a need to oppose. The decision is purely political for Gardner. But he was already facing an uphill battle in Colorado. Garnder, like so many other Republicans, will have to consider the long- term implications of this vote. Gardner wants to have a future in Republican politics and confirming the nominee while losing his reelection is better for his future than voting against the nominee and losing his reelection. In terms of timing, McConnell and Trump would like to get the nominee confirmed before Election Day, but it's very possible it won't happen until the lame duck session. Senator Roy Blunt (R-MO), a member of the GOP leadership team, yesterday said "Everything will have to get done pretty precisely," for a vote to be held before Election Day. But a challenge for McConnell is that he may be down a Senate seat as early as November 30th. That's because the Arizona Senate race is classified as a special election to finish the final two years of the late John McCain's term. If Democrat Mark Kelly wins the race against Senator Martha McSally (R-AZ), he could be sworn in by the end of November, according to Arizona election lawyers. This won't matter if only Collins and Murkowski defect, but a lame duck where Trump lost his reelection and Senate Republicans lost their majority could put added pressure on Romney to hold off on a vote. Then there is the question of what, if anything, Democrats can do to stop this. Right now, there's little Democrats can do to directly stop the vote. In an interview yesterday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said she's "not ruling anything out" and will "use every arrow in our quiver." She did not rule out the possibility of impeaching Trump again or Attorney General Bill Barr. Impeachment could theoretically hold precedent on the Senate floor, thereby delaying a Senate confirmation vote. However, one impeachment expert said this tactic wouldn't slow the Senate down. Senate Democrats are threatening future action on the Senate filibuster and the number of Supreme Court seats if Republicans go ahead with the vote. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) over the weekend said, "Let me be clear: if Leader McConnell and Senate Republicans move forward with this, then nothing is off the table for next year." Of course, Schumer already used the phrase "nothing is off the table" before Ginsburg's death about what Democrats would do if they won the majority. Such a threat is unlikely to dissuade Republicans. But there is an increased prospect that the threat could become a reality if this confirmation pushes moderate Democrats to being open to a rules change on the filibuster, and thus on hot button issues like expanding the size of the Supreme Court or admitting new states into the US (i.e. D.C. or Puerto Rico) that would only require a simple majority vote. More broadly, a Senate rules change on the filibuster will open the door to a whole host of progressive policy priorities (although 50 votes will still be needed). The electoral implications of Ginsburg's death and the Republican push to fill the seat remain unknown for now. This certainly qualifies as the September/October election surprise that could theoretically change the trajectory of the race. However, given the historical steadiness of the election in a historic year of events (e.g., impeachment, Covid-19, recession), it's good to be skeptical of anyone saying this creates a major change in the race.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ASD-Covert-Foreign-Money.Pdf
    overt C Foreign Covert Money Financial loopholes exploited by AUGUST 2020 authoritarians to fund political interference in democracies AUTHORS: Josh Rudolph and Thomas Morley © 2020 The Alliance for Securing Democracy Please direct inquiries to The Alliance for Securing Democracy at The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1700 18th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/covert-foreign-money/. The views expressed in GMF publications and commentary are the views of the authors alone. Cover and map design: Kenny Nguyen Formatting design: Rachael Worthington Alliance for Securing Democracy The Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), a bipartisan initiative housed at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, develops comprehensive strategies to deter, defend against, and raise the costs on authoritarian efforts to undermine and interfere in democratic institutions. ASD brings together experts on disinformation, malign finance, emerging technologies, elections integrity, economic coercion, and cybersecurity, as well as regional experts, to collaborate across traditional stovepipes and develop cross-cutting frame- works. Authors Josh Rudolph Fellow for Malign Finance Thomas Morley Research Assistant Contents Executive Summary �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Introduction and Methodology ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Black Lives Matter's Organizational Structure
    JULY/AUGUST 2020 SEATTLE PORTLAND MINNEAPOLIS BOSTON NEW YORK CITY WASHINGTON, DC SAN FRANCISCO BEHIND THE UNREST: BLACK LIVES MATTER’S ORGANIZATIONAL PAGE 13 STRUCTURE AND FUNDRAISING ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: Terror of the Unborn: The Dynamics of Slay the Dragon: Warren Buffett’s Billions Civil Forfeiture Save Democracy by 5 for Abortion 21 Reform 27 Eliminating Democracy www.CapitalResearch.org Is Your Legacy Safe? An instructive and cautionary tale for our time. —W.J. Hume, Jaquelin Hume Foundation for anyone thinking about establishing a private foundation. —Linda Childears, No, your legacy is not safe. gone, the odds of successful giving are stacked even higher against you. Entrepreneurial geniuses like Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and Henry Ford were rarely tricked out of their money in business deals. But when they gave their money away, they failed to have their intentions respected. your legacy. Everyone who wants to use their money to change the world needs to read this book. Find it on Amazon JULY/AUGUST 2020 CONTENTS Volume 5, Issue 5 FOUNDATION WATCH Terror of the Unborn: 5 Warren Buffett’s Billions for Abortion 3 By Hayden Ludwig COMMENTARY The Various Faces of Black Lives Matter By Robert Stilson SPECIAL REPORT Behind the Unrest: 13 Black Lives Matter’s Capital Research is a monthly publication of the Capital Research Organizational Structure Center (CRC), a nonpartisan education and Fundraising and research organization, classified by the IRS as a 501(c)(3) public charity. By Hayden Ludwig and Robert Stilson CRC is an independent, tax-exempt institution governed by an independent board of trustees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fourteen-Billion-Dollar Election Emerging Campaign Finance Trends and Their Impact on the 2020 Presidential Race and Beyond
    12 The Fourteen-Billion-Dollar Election Emerging Campaign Finance Trends and their Impact on the 2020 Presidential Race and Beyond Michael E. Toner and Karen E. Trainer The 2020 presidential and congressional election was the most expensive election in American history, shattering previous fundraising and spending records. Total spending on the 2020 election totaled an estimated $14 bil- lion, which was more than double the amount spent during the 2016 cycle and more than any previous election in U.S. history. 1 The historic 2020 spending tally was more than was spent in the previous two election cycles combined.2 Moreover, former Vice President Joseph Biden and Senator Kamala Harris made fundraising history in 2020 as their presidential campaign became the first campaign in history to raise over $1 billion in a single election cycle, with a total of $1.1 billion.3 For their part, President Trump and Vice Presi- dent Pence raised in excess of $700 million for their presidential campaign, more than double the amount that they raised in 2016.4 The record amount of money expended on the 2020 election was also fu- eled by a significant increase in spending by outside groups such as Super PACs as well as enhanced congressional candidate fundraising. Political party expenditures increased in 2020, but constituted a smaller share of total electoral spending. Of the $14 billion total, approximately $6.6 billion was spent in connection with the presidential race and $7.2 billion was expended at the congressional level.5 To put those spending amounts into perspective, the $7.2 billion tally at the congressional level nearly equals the GDP of Monaco.6 More than $1 billion of the $14 billion was spent for online advertising on platforms such as Facebook and Google.7 203 204 Michael E.
    [Show full text]
  • United States of America
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GENERAL ELECTIONS 3 November 2020 ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report Warsaw 9 February 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................................... 6 III. BACKGROUND AND POLITICAL CONTEXT .............................................................................. 7 IV. ELECTORAL SYSTEM ....................................................................................................................... 7 V. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................................................... 9 VI. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ..................................................................................................... 11 VII. CYBER SECURITY ............................................................................................................................ 13 VIII. VOTER RIGHTS ................................................................................................................................ 14 IX. VOTER REGISTRATION ................................................................................................................. 16 X. VOTER IDENTIFICATION .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the Shadow of Trump: How the 2016 Presidential Contest Affected
    In the Shadow of Trump: How the 2016 Presidential Contest Affected House and Senate Primaries Prepared for the 2017 State of the Parties Conference, Akron, Ohio Robert G. Boatright, Clark University [email protected] The presidential race did not quite monopolize all of the uncivil or bizarre moments of the summer of 2016. One of the more interesting exchanges took place in Arizona in August of 2016, during the weeks before the state’s Senate primary election. Senator John McCain, always a somewhat unpredictable politician, has had difficulties in his last two primaries. Perhaps because he was perceived as having strayed too far toward the political center, or perhaps simply because his presidential bid had created some distance between McCain and Arizonans, he faced a vigorous challenge in 2010 from conservative talk show host and former Congressman J. D. Hayworth. McCain ultimately beat back Hayworth’s challenge, 56 percent to 32 percent, but only after a bitter campaign in which McCain spent a total of over $21 million and abandoned much of his “maverick” positioning and presented himself as a staunch conservative and a fierce opponent of illegal immigration (Steinhauer 2010). His task was made easier by his ability to attack Hayworth’s own checkered career in Congress. In 2016, McCain again faced a competitive primary opponent, physician, Tea Party activist, and two-term State Senator Kelli Ward. Ward, like Hayworth, argued that McCain was not conservative enough for Arizona. Ward was (and is), however, a decade younger than Hayworth, and her shorter tenure in political office made it harder for McCain to attack her.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 164 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, JULY 26, 2018 No. 126 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. and was Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- strengthen education, and combat called to order by the Speaker pro tem- nal stands approved. human trafficking. I have always relied pore (Mr. CURTIS). f upon her counsel and appreciate her f forthrightness and her integrity. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE As she leaves my office and begins DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the the next phase of her career working PRO TEMPORE gentleman from Maryland (Mr. BROWN) for a member of the California State The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- come forward and lead the House in the Senate, I know she will continue to fore the House the following commu- Pledge of Allegiance. serve the people of California well. nication from the Speaker: Mr. BROWN of Maryland led the f WASHINGTON, DC, Pledge of Allegiance as follows: July 26, 2018. I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the REUNITE EVERY CHILD I hereby appoint the Honorable JOHN R. United States of America, and to the Repub- IMMEDIATELY CURTIS to act as Speaker pro tempore on this lic for which it stands, one nation under God, day. indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. (Mr. BROWN of Maryland asked and PAUL D. RYAN, f was given permission to address the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Participation and Polarization
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository ARTICLES PARTICIPATION AND POLARIZATION Richard H. Pildes* ABSTRACT Campaign-finance reformers have turned in recent years to a novel form of publicly-financed elections—small- donor matching programs—as the way to reduce the perceived corruption that arises from the current role of money in American elections. The rise of the Internet and social media have transformed the way campaigns are funded and turned small donors into a major force in American campaigns. The 2018 elections dramatically demonstrated the new power of small donors. Building on this transformation, the focus of reform efforts are now programs that match small donations ($200 or less) with public funds, which typically provide $6 in public funds for every $1 in small donations. Indeed, the first bill introduced in the new Democratically controlled House proposes to create a 6:1 small-dollar matching program for national elections. In addition, the Democratic Party required candidates for the 2020 presidential election to demonstrate a certain level of success with small donors as one of only two factors that determined eligibility to be on the “main debate” stage for the first several debates. Small-donor based public financing is touted as enhancing participation in democracy; improving the equality of campaign financing; and providing a countervailing force against the role of large donors or special-interest money. But little attention has been paid so far, particularly in the legal literature, to the effect of small donors on what is one of the most troubling aspects of American democracy today: the intense polarization of the political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 United States District Court Southern District Of
    Case 0:16-cv-61511-WJZ Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2016 Page 1 of 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION CASE NO. 16-cv-61511-WJZ CAROL WILDING; STANLEY RIFKEN; FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT – SHARON CRAWFORD; WILLIAM SCOTT FRANZ; DAVID PULASKI; MARY CLASS ACTION JASMINE WELCH; JOSE ALBERTO GONZALEZ; JANE ELLEN PLATTNER; KIM MARIE HOULE; TIMOTHY BINGEN; SUSAN REED; ANGELA MONSON; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL AIMEE R. COLEMAN; ELESHA SNYDER; MATTHEW SHAW; ZACHARY JAMES HANEY; ESTRELLA GONZALEZ; CATHERINE G. CYKO; LAURA GENNA; MARIANNE BLAIR; TAMARA L. JOHNSTON; VALERIE ELYSE RASCH; BRETT TEEGARDIN; DANIEL O’MEARA; PEGGY LEW; DANIEL J. REYNOLDS; BRENDA LEE SMITH; MARLOWE ST. CLOUD PRIMACK; PATRICIA D. CASSIDY; BRITTANY R. MUSICK; HARRIS BIERHOFF; FELICIA MICHELLE TAYLOR; SUSAN L. SINGER; KYLE G. BRAUND; LAUREN HALE; WILLIAM CRANDALL; KIRSTEN HURST; DUFFY ROBERT WEISS; CONNIE ANDERSON; GREGORY WITKOWSKI; ELIZABETH FIGUEROA; BRANDY KINCAID; KIMBERLY ALBERTS; RACHEL RODERICK; LAURA MICHELLE VAUGHN; LISA GALE; TAMMY DEITCH- COULTER; KAYITE ASHCRAFT; ALECIA R. DAVIS; DOMINIC RONZANI; LUKE GRIM; ROSALIE CONSIGLIO; EDWIN LUGO; HEATHER DADE; MICHAEL S. REED; RHIANNON CRANDALL; RYAN GHAN; LISA SETTLE; YALONDA DYE COOPER; DANIEL S. COOPER; MATTHEW JOSEPH BRADY; ANDREW ROUSSEAU; SUSAN CATTERALL; JULIE 1 Case 0:16-cv-61511-WJZ Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2016 Page 2 of 39 HAMPTON; CHRIS BUBB; ERIK FURREBOE; ZEKE SHAW; BENJAMIN ILARRAZA; LUCILLE GROOMS; CHRISTINE MAIURANO; LEWIS L. HUMISTON, IV; JOHN LYNCH; JAMES SIMON; LESTER JOHN BATES, III; JEFFREY GOLDBERG; RICK WASHIK; RICHARD BOOKER; KARLIE COLE; ERICH SPARKS; PRABU GOPALAKRISHNAN; CARLOS VILLAMAR; CAROLYN JACOBSON; DAN ELLIS DUDLEY; LISA ANNE MENEELY; D.J.
    [Show full text]
  • July 14, 2020 Black Lives Matter and the Hatch Act I. Beginning in Late
    U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL 1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 218 Washington, D.C. 20036-4505 202-804-7000 July 14, 2020 Black Lives Matter and the Hatch Act I. INTRODUCTION Beginning in late May 2020, protesters began organizing large demonstrations across the United States. The immediate precipitating event was the videotaped police killing of George Floyd, a black man. However, the demonstrations are largely focused on the issue of racism in America more broadly and not limited to Mr. Floyd’s death alone. The phrase “Black Lives Matter” (BLM) is frequently used by protesters and associated with the demonstrations. Additionally, BLM-related organizations have supported and/or organized demonstrations. In response, numerous federal employees have asked OSC whether BLM or related materials raise any Hatch Act concerns when used or displayed while on duty or in the federal workplace. The questions raise two distinct but related issues. The first is whether using BLM terminology is inherently political activity. And the second is whether the Black Lives Matter Global Network (BLMGN)—the owner of www.blacklivesmatter.com and arguably the most prominent BLM-related organization—is a partisan political group. As further described below, using BLM terminology is not inherently political activity and BLMGN is not currently a partisan political group.1 Accordingly, the Hatch Act generally allows employees to engage in BLM-related activity while on duty or in the workplace. But, as described below, employees are still prohibited from combining BLM-related activity with “political activity” while on duty or in the workplace and from engaging in partisan political fundraising in connection with BLM- related organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • July 10, 2020 Black Lives Matter and the Hatch Act I. Beginning in Late
    U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL 1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 218 Washington, D.C. 20036-4505 202-804-7000 July 10, 2020 Black Lives Matter and the Hatch Act I. INTRODUCTION Beginning in late May 2020, protesters began organizing large demonstrations across the United States. The immediate precipitating event was the videotaped police killing of George Floyd, a black man. However, the demonstrations are largely focused on the issue of racism in America more broadly and not limited to Mr. Floyd’s death alone. The phrase “Black Lives Matter” (BLM) is frequently used by protesters and associated with the demonstrations. Additionally, BLM-related organizations have supported and/or organized demonstrations. In response, numerous federal employees have asked OSC whether BLM or related materials raise any Hatch Act concerns when used or displayed while on duty or in the federal workplace. The questions raise two distinct but related issues. The first is whether using BLM terminology is inherently political activity. And the second is whether the Black Lives Matter Global Network (BLMGN)—the owner of www.blacklivesmatter.com and arguably the most prominent BLM-related organization—is a partisan political group. As further described below, using BLM terminology is not inherently political activity and BLMGN is not currently a partisan political group.1 Accordingly, the Hatch Act generally allows employees to engage in BLM-related activity while on duty or in the workplace. But, as described below, employees are still prohibited from combining BLM-related activity with “political activity” while on duty or in the workplace and from engaging in partisan political fundraising in connection with BLM- related organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Dismay Over Roads Bills Eric K
    www.greenvilledemocrats.com “Like” us on Facebook “Greenville County Democratic Party” March 2016 PARTY LEADERSHIP Democratic Dismay Over Roads Bills Eric K. Graben Greenville County Chair The national Republican Party is in total disarray, approaching meltdown Shirley Scott while closer to home it’s become 1st Vice Chair obvious to working families of South Susan Cyr Carolina that the Republicans running 2nd Vice Chair our state legislature are also a dys- functional, divided entity. The antitax Whitney Wright crowd led by Governor Nikki Haley 3rd Vice Chair have refused direct calls for a gas tax increase from a majority of state Peggy Baxter Roxanne Cordonier Secretary Republicans, http://www.greenville online.com/story/opinion/editorials/20 gas tax as a means of paying for road Anita LeBold 15/12/16/yeargastaxincrease/ 7730 improvements. When a billion dollar Treasurer 3230/ the South Carolina Chamber of budget surplus was uncovered, antitax Commerce and business leaders Republicans were given a means of Joe Waters across the state. funding some improvements without State Executive a gas tax hike. The business Committee Delegate http://www.postandcourier.com/article /20160106/PC1603/160109594/1006/ community has long called for a gas Ingrid Erwin To add to the drama, Governor Haley tax hike to serve as a recurring and State Executive has insisted that she will veto any bill steady stream of money. SC Senator Committee Delegate that doesn’t restructure the Depart- Tom Davis led his second filibuster ment of Transportation and include a early in the current session to block James Massey the proposed gas tax increase.
    [Show full text]
  • National Press Club Luncheon with Martha Burk, Director of the Corporate Accountability Project at the National Council of Women's Organizations
    NATIONAL PRESS CLUB LUNCHEON WITH MARTHA BURK, DIRECTOR OF THE CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT AT THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF WOMEN'S ORGANIZATIONS MODERATOR: ALAN BJERGA, MEMBER, NATIONAL PRESS CLUB BOARD OF GOVERNORS LOCATION: NATIONAL PRESS CLUB BALLROOM, WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME: 1:00 P.M EDT DATE: FRIDAY, MAY 25, 2007 (C) COPYRIGHT 2005, FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC., 1000 VERMONT AVE. NW; 5TH FLOOR; WASHINGTON, DC - 20005, USA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ANY REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED. UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES A MISAPPROPRIATION UNDER APPLICABLE UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW, AND FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO PURSUE ALL REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO IT IN RESPECT TO SUCH MISAPPROPRIATION. FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. IS A PRIVATE FIRM AND IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. NO COPYRIGHT IS CLAIMED AS TO ANY PART OF THE ORIGINAL WORK PREPARED BY A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE AS PART OF THAT PERSON'S OFFICIAL DUTIES. FOR INFORMATION ON SUBSCRIBING TO FNS, PLEASE CALL JACK GRAEME AT 202-347-1400. ------------------------- MR. BJERGA: Good afternoon and welcome to the National Press Club for our speaker luncheon featuring Martha Burk. My name is Alan Bjerga and I'm a reporter for Bloomberg News and a member of the National Press Club's Board of Governors. I'd like to welcome club members and their guests in the audience today as well as those of you watching on C-SPAN. We're looking forward to today's speech, and afterwards I will ask as many questions from the audience as time permits. Please hold your applause during the speech so that we may have time for as many questions as possible.
    [Show full text]