Albert AURIER, Critique D’Art Et Poète (1865-1892)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Downloaded from Brill.Com10/04/2021 08:07:20AM This Is an Open Access Chapter Distributed Under the Terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR HISTORY, CULTURE AND MODERNITY www.history-culture-modernity.org Published by: Uopen Journals Copyright: © The Author(s). Content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence eISSN: 2213-0624 L’Art pour l’Art or L’Art pour Tous? The Tension Between Artistic Autonomy and Social Engagement in Les Temps Nouveaux, 1896–1903 Laura Prins HCM 4 (1): 92–126 DOI: 10.18352/hcm.505 Abstract Between 1896 and 1903, Jean Grave, editor of the anarchist journal Les Temps Nouveaux, published an artistic album of original prints, with the collaboration of (avant-garde) artists and illustrators. While anar- chist theorists, including Grave, summoned artists to create social art, which had to be didactic and accessible to the working classes, artists wished to emphasize their autonomous position instead. Even though Grave requested ‘absolutely artistic’ prints in the case of this album, artists had difficulties with creating something for him, trying to com- bine their social engagement with their artistic autonomy. The artistic album appears to have become a compromise of the debate between the anarchist theorists and artists with anarchist sympathies. Keywords: anarchism, France, Neo-Impressionism, nineteenth century, original print Introduction While the Neo-Impressionist painter Paul Signac (1863–1935) was preparing for a lecture in 1902, he wrote, ‘Justice in sociology, har- mony in art: same thing’.1 Although Signac never officially published the lecture, his words have frequently been cited by scholars since the 1960s, who claim that they illustrate the widespread modern idea that any revolutionary avant-garde artist automatically was revolutionary in 92 HCM 2016, VOL. -
1 Tomasz Dziewicki University of Warsaw Intensivism As a Tool of An
III. International Forum for doctoral candidates in East European art history, Berlin, 29th April 2016, organized by the Chair of Art History of Eastern and East Central Europe, Humboldt University Berlin Tomasz Dziewicki University of Warsaw XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Intensivism as a Tool of an Art Historian In 1897 in Warsaw, the art critic, Cezary Jellenta, published in a weekly magazine "Głos" the article titled Intensivism. This article in its times did not influence on a polish art, but nowadays a category of intensivism created by Jellenta can be seen as an useable tool from the point of view a art historian. Jellenta noticed in his article a new trend in painting of the end of the century. In his mind modern art turned to a subjective way of perception of reality. Presentation of ordinary objects and phenomena, which are known by a viewer, in work of art tends to experience them anew. The art critic maintained a role of personal experience of powers of nature through a painting and the fact that this power may be embodied with the soul of an artist. At the beginning of his paper he refered to anachronistic examples of Andreas Achenbach's and Anders Zorn's work but also pointed out Arnold Böcklin, Władysław Podkowiński or Józef Pankiewicz as founders of the new movement. Jellenta paid attention to a modern composition, simplification and painting synthesis, which enable to express reality better and deeper. He applies a category, separated plastically and semantically from a representation, of main motif , which, as Jellenta wrote, "tunes our soul". In fact it is an attempt to transfer the music theory of Leitmotif by Richard Wagner on the ground of the painting. -
Vincent Van Gogh the Starry Night
Richard Thomson Vincent van Gogh The Starry Night the museum of modern art, new york The Starry Night without doubt, vincent van gogh’s painting the starry night (fig. 1) is an iconic image of modern culture. One of the beacons of The Museum of Modern Art, every day it draws thousands of visitors who want to gaze at it, be instructed about it, or be photographed in front of it. The picture has a far-flung and flexible identity in our collective musée imaginaire, whether in material form decorating a tie or T-shirt, as a visual quotation in a book cover or caricature, or as a ubiquitously understood allusion to anguish in a sentimental popular song. Starry Night belongs in the front rank of the modern cultural vernacular. This is rather a surprising status to have been achieved by a painting that was executed with neither fanfare nor much explanation in Van Gogh’s own correspondence, that on reflection the artist found did not satisfy him, and that displeased his crucial supporter and primary critic, his brother Theo. Starry Night was painted in June 1889, at a period of great complexity in Vincent’s life. Living at the asylum of Saint-Rémy in the south of France, a Dutchman in Provence, he was cut off from his country, family, and fellow artists. His isolation was enhanced by his state of health, psychologically fragile and erratic. Yet for all these taxing disadvantages, Van Gogh was determined to fulfill himself as an artist, the road that he had taken in 1880. -
Vincent Van Gogh, Who Grew up Walking the Dutch Countryside
"Sorrowful yet always rejoicing," Vincent van Gogh, who grew up walking the Dutch countryside, traveled through life seeking the eternal "Light that rises in the darkness"- like these swans readying for flight south of Amsterdam. From the pain and beauty of his journey, he created masterworks of passion, including penetrating self-portraits, such as this one at age 34. Van Gogh likened painting to performing music. "Whether I really sang a lullaby in colors," he wrote, "I leave to the critics." National Geographic, October, 1997 By JOEL L. SWERDLOW, ASSISTANT EDITOR Photographs by LYNN JOHNSON THE LETTERS FROM VINCENT VAN GOGH to his brother Theo are yellowed. Some are torn at the corners or have holes from aging. Acid from ink eats through the cheap paper. I have come to this bombproof vault in the cellar of the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam to begin my search for Vincent. Who was this man who said he "sang a lullaby in colors:' and why does he have such a hold on us? His paintings sell for the most money; his exhibitions attract the highest number of visitors; reproductions of his work-on socks, sheets, party napkins, coffee cups-permeate homes and offices; the song "Vincent" has sold more than ten million copies since 1971; movies mythologize his life. No other artist, at any time in any culture, has been more popular. THE 650 LETTERS from Vincent to Theo fill three volumes. Their first surprise is immediate: I knew that Theo financed Vincent's painting and had assumed Theo was the big brother. -
La Relève Critique D'albert Aurier
La relève critique d’Albert Aurier Julien Schuh To cite this version: Julien Schuh. La relève critique d’Albert Aurier. Colloque international ” Les revues, laboratoires de la critique (1880-1920) ”, Nov 2007, Le Mans, France. hal-00987276 HAL Id: hal-00987276 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00987276 Submitted on 5 May 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. LA RELÈVE CRITIQUE D’ALBERT AURIER Julien Schuh Il ne s’agit pas pour moi de revenir une nouvelle fois sur Aurier, découvreur héroïque de Gauguin et de van Gogh, méconnu et pourtant tant lu. Ce qui m’a intéressé dans sa figure, c’est moins sa présence que sa disparition : en mourant opportunément le 5 octobre 1892, à vingt-sept ans, d’une fièvre typhoïde qu’il refusa crânement de faire soigner, Aurier nous a donné l’occasion d’observer ce que l’effacement d’une figure importante dans un champ critique donné peut révéler de la structuration dudit champ. Cet instant de tension met à nu les rouages et permet de mesurer les influences réelles, les polarisations, et d’analyser, par l’appel d’air créé, les effets de carambolage, la redistribution des critiques, des éloges et des blâmes. -
Van Gogh Museum Journal 2002
Van Gogh Museum Journal 2002 bron Van Gogh Museum Journal 2002. Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam 2002 Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/_van012200201_01/colofon.php © 2012 dbnl / Rijksmuseum Vincent Van Gogh 7 Director's foreword In 2003 the Van Gogh Museum will have been in existence for 30 years. Our museum is thus still a relative newcomer on the international scene. Nonetheless, in this fairly short period, the Van Gogh Museum has established itself as one of the liveliest institutions of its kind, with a growing reputation for its collections, exhibitions and research programmes. The past year has been marked by particular success: the Van Gogh and Gauguin exhibition attracted record numbers of visitors to its Amsterdam venue. And in this Journal we publish our latest acquisitions, including Manet's The jetty at Boulogne-sur-mer, the first important work by this artist to enter any Dutch public collection. By a happy coincidence, our 30th anniversary coincides with the 150th of the birth of Vincent van Gogh. As we approach this milestone it seemed to us a good moment to reflect on the current state of Van Gogh studies. For this issue of the Journal we asked a number of experts to look back on the most significant developments in Van Gogh research since the last major anniversary in 1990, the centenary of the artist's death. Our authors were asked to filter a mass of published material in differing areas, from exhibition publications to writings about fakes and forgeries. To complement this, we also invited a number of specialists to write a short piece on one picture from our collection, an exercise that is intended to evoke the variety and resourcefulness of current writing on Van Gogh. -
Art 150: Introduction to the Visual Arts David Mccarthy Rhodes College, Spring 2003 414 Clough, Ext
Art 150: Introduction to the Visual Arts David McCarthy Rhodes College, Spring 2003 414 Clough, Ext. 3663 417 Clough, MWF 11:30-12:30 Office Hours: MWF 2:00- 4:00, and by appointment. COURSE OBJECTIVES AND DESCRIPTION The objectives of the course are as follows: (1) to provide students with a comprehensive, theoretical introduction to the visual arts; (2) to develop skills of visual analysis; (3) to examine various media used by artists; (4) to introduce students to methods of interpretation; and (5) to develop skills in writing about art. Throughout the course we will keep in mind the following two statements: Pierre Auguste Renoir’s reminder that, “to practice an art, you must begin with the ABCs of that art;” and E.H. Gombrich’s insight that, “the form of representation cannot be divorced from its purpose and the requirements of the society in which the given language gains currency.” Among the themes and issues we will examine are the following: balance, shape and form, space, color, conventions, signs and symbols, representation, reception, and interpretation. To do this we will look at many different types of art produced in several historical epochs and conceived in a variety of media. Whenever possible we will examine original art objects. Art 150 is a foundation course that serves as an introduction for further work in studio art and art history. A three-hour course, Art 150 satisfies the fine arts requirement. Enrollment is limited to first- and second-year students who are not expected to have had any previous experience with either studio or art history. -
Eduard Vuillard: Exploring the Limits of Intimism Belinda Thomson Henri
Eduard Vuillard: Exploring the Limits of Intimism Belinda Thomson Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec’s “Femmes de Maison”: The “Back” Story Richard Thomson April 1, 2010 Dallas Museum of Art Horchow Auditorium Olivier Meslay: Good evening, and welcome the Dallas Museum of Art’s Late Night and to this evening’s lecture. I am Olivier Meslay, Senior Curator for European and American Art and the Barbara Thomas Lemmon Curator for European Art here at the DMA, and it’s my privilege to introduce you to tonight’s speakers, Belinda and Richard Thomson, as part of our Richard R. Brettell Lecture Series. Richard and Belinda Thomson will speak not together, but successively. They will enlighten us, commenting on works from the collection of another formidable couple, Wendy and Emery Reves, as part of a year-long celebration of the jubilee of the Reves Collections coming to Dallas Museum of Art. Belinda Thomson is now an independent art historian and an Honorary Fellow at the University of Edinburgh. She curated many exhibitions on both sides of the ocean. Belinda shares with Richard interests for some same artists, but had focused more on the later generation with artists like Vuillard and Bonnard. She will talk tonight on “Vuillard: Exploring the Limits of Intimism.” Vuillard is one of the artists best represented in our collection with six paintings, two in the Reves Collection, one given by Mrs. Margaret McDermott, one given by Mr. and Mrs. Barron Kidd, and another by the Bromberg family and one by the Meadows Foundation. I do not mention the works on paper, drawings, and prints and it would be a real pleasure to learn more about them. -
Des « Symbolistes » Aux « Nabis ». La Genèse D’Un Groupe Et D’Une Catégorie Singulière Catherine Méneux
UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 1 PANTHÉON-SORBONNE CENTRE DE RECHERCHE HiCSA (Histoire culturelle et sociale de l’art - EA 4100) HiCSA Éditions en ligne CRITIQUE(S) D’ART : NOUVEAUX CORPUS, NOUVELLES MÉTHODES SOUS LA DIRECTION DE MARIE GISPERT ET DE CATHERINE MÉNEUX DES « SYMBOLISTES » AUX « NABIS ». LA GENÈSE D’UN GROUPE ET D’UNE CATÉGORIE SINGULIÈRE CATHERINE MÉNEUX Pour citer cet article Catherine Méneux, « Des “Symbolistes” aux “Nabis”. La genèse d’un groupe et d’une catégorie singulière », dans Marie Gispert et Catherine Méneux (dir.), Critique(s) d’art : nouveaux corpus, nouvelles méthodes, Paris, site de l’HiCSA, mis en ligne en mars 2019, p. 452-539. ISBN : 978-2-491040-02-4 DES « SYMBOLISTES » AUX « NABIS » LA GENÈSE D’UN GROUPE ET D’UNE CATÉGORIE SINGULIÈRE CATHERINE MÉNEUX En 1899, François Thiébault-Sisson rend compte d’une exposition importante organisée en hommage à Odilon Redon chez Durand-Ruel, qui réunit pour la première fois dans ses prestigieuses galeries des jeunes artistes de l’avant-garde 1. Ce début de consécration appelle au retour en arrière et, à propos de certains d’entre eux – les « symbolistes d’antan » –, Thiébault-Sisson se souvient de la « curiosité soulevée » par leur première exposition dans la galerie du marchand Louis-Léon Le Barc de Boutteville en 1891. Le critique évoque alors tour à tour Maurice Denis, Paul Sérusier, Pierre Bonnard, Paul Ranson, Jozsef Rippl-Ronai, Félix Vallotton, Édouard Vuillard, Charles Filiger et Ker-Xavier Roussel, avant de conclure sur une interprétation de leur démarche artistique ponctuée de paradoxes : « on voit que les symbolistes d’antan n’étaient symbolistes qu’à demi. -
Thesis Is That It Was Crucial for Any Artist to Employ Specific Exhibition Strategies in Order to Be Noted and Appreciated in This Plenitude of Art Works
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Foreign artists versus French critics Exhibition strategies and critical reception at the Salon des Indépendants in Paris (1884- 1914) van Dijk, M.E. Publication date 2017 Document Version Final published version License Other Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): van Dijk, M. E. (2017). Foreign artists versus French critics: Exhibition strategies and critical reception at the Salon des Indépendants in Paris (1884-1914). General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:07 Oct 2021 Foreign Artists versus French Critics: Exhibition Strategies and Critical Reception at the Salon des Indépendants in Paris (1884-1914) by Maite van Dijk University of Amsterdam 2017 Foreign Artists versus French Critics: Exhibition Strategies and Critical Reception at the Salon des Indépendants in Paris (1884-1914) ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. -
Decorative Painting and Politics in France, 1890-1914
Decorative Painting and Politics in France, 1890-1914 by Katherine D. Brion A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History of Art) in the University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Professor Howard Lay, Chair Professor Joshua Cole Professor Michèle Hannoosh Professor Susan Siegfried © Katherine D. Brion 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I will begin by thanking Howard Lay, who was instrumental in shaping the direction and final form of this dissertation. His unbroken calm and good-humor, even in the face of my tendency to take up new ideas and projects before finishing with the old, was of huge benefit to me, especially in the final stages—as were his careful and generous (re)readings of the text. Susan Siegfried and Michèle Hannoosh were also early mentors, first offering inspiring coursework and then, as committee members, advice and comments at key stages. Their feedback was such that I always wished I had solicited more, along with Michèle’s tea. Josh Cole’s seminar gave me a window not only into nineteenth-century France but also into the practice of history, and his kind yet rigorous comments on the dissertation are a model I hope to emulate. Betsy Sears has also been an important source of advice and encouragement. The research and writing of this dissertation was funded by fellowships and grants from the Georges Lurcy Foundation, the Rackham Graduate School at the University of Michigan, the Mellon Foundation, and the Getty Research Institute, as well as a Susan Lipschutz Award. My research was also made possible by the staffs at the Bibliothèque nationale de France, the Institut nationale d’Histoire de l’Art, the Getty Research Library, the Musée des arts décoratifs/Musée de la Publicité, and the Musée Maurice Denis, ii among other institutions. -
Redefining European Symbolism C
Redefining European Symbolism, c.1880-1910 Nabis Seminar: Amsterdam 26 November 2010 Van Gogh Museum, Library Network Director: Professor Richard Thomson, University of Edinburgh Network Facilitator: Craig Landt, University of Edinburgh Attendees: Chris Stolwijk, Van Gogh Museum (Amsterdam) Belinda Thomson, University of Edinburgh Catherine Meneux, University of Paris Merel van Tilburg, University of Geneva Allison Morehead, Queen’s University (Toronto) Cathérine Verleysen, Museum of Fine Arts (Ghent) Felix Krämer, Städel Museum (Frankfurt am Main) Fleur Roos Rosa de Carvalho, Van Gogh Museum (Amsterdam) Marije Vellekop, Van Gogh Museum (Amsterdam) Nienke Bakker, Van Gogh Museum (Amsterdam) Frances Fowle, University of Edinburgh/National Galleries of Scotland Willem Russell (Amsterdam) Fred Leeman (Amsterdam) Isabelle Cahn, Musée d’Orsay (Paris) Sylivie Patry, Musée d’Orsay (Paris) Laurence Madeline, Musée d’Orsay (Paris) Rodolph Rapetti, Institut National d’Histoire de l’Art (Paris) Jean David Jumeau-Lafond (Paris) Maryanne Stevens, Royal Academy (London) Christopher Riopelle, The National Gallery (London) Katia Poletti, Fondation Felix Vallotton (Lausanne) The second meeting of the Research Network entitled ‘Redefining European Symbolism, c.1880-1910’ took place in Amsterdam. This was a seminar made up of six papers given to an invited audience. The seminar topics related to the study of the Nabis, and each paper was 30 minutes 1 long with 15 minutes of discussion following. Below are the précis and abridged points of discussion. As Principal Grant Holder, Richard Thomson (RT) opened the seminar by welcoming all those who could attend and continued by outlining the objectives of the seminar and Network funded by the Leverhulme Trust. Maurice Denis, La Définition du Néo-traditionnisme and Anti- Naturalism Richard and Belinda Thomson Born in November 1870, Denis was still 19 when La Définition du Néo- traditionnisme was published in Art et critique in August 1890.