University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

PARASITIC ASSOCIATED WITH YAM (DISCOREA ROTUNDATA) AND MORPHOMETRIC CHARACTERIZATION OF BRADYS IN THE KRACHI NCHUMURU DISTRICT, GHANA

BY

ABDULLAH KWAME ENCHILL

(10051593)

THIS THESIS IS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON IN

PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF M. PHIL

CROP SCIENCE DEGREE

JULY, 2017

1

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

DECLARATION

I certify that this study was conducted by me Abdullah Kwame Enchill of Crop Science

Department, University of Ghana, Legon at Krachi Nchumuru District and Plant Pathology

Laboratory at the University of Ghana Legon. I further testify that this thesis has never been submitted on any occasion at any University for the award of a degree and that any literature cited has been acknowledged.

…………………..

Abdullah Kwame Enchill

(Candidate)

…………………. …………………

Dr. Eric William Cornelius Dr. Seloame Tatu Nyaku (Supervisor) (Supervisor)

i

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

ABSTRACT

A dry rot of yam Dioscorea rotundata which attacks tubers in the field and in storage is currently threatening production of the crop in the Krachi Nchumuru District of the Volta Region No detailed investigation has been conducted therefore a study was carried out from October 2016 to

May 2017 to assess the knowledge, perception and experiences of farmers in the District on the occurrence and management of the tuber dry rot disease, isolate, identify and assess plant parasitic genera Krachi Nchumuru District in yam fields and stored yam tubers; determine variation within and among population of Scutellonema. bradys using morphological and morphometric characteristics. Questionnaire were developed and administered randomly to 50 farmers in 10 communities. The questionnaires covered demographic characteristics, land use intensity, farmers’ knowledge, perception and experience concerning occurrence of nematodes in yam fields and stored yam tubers, management and economic importance of yam nematodes. Yam rhizosphere soil samples were collected from 20 farms in the district for nematode extraction using

Jenkins centrifugation method. Three stored yam tubers were also collected from the same farmers for nematode extraction using Baemanns extraction method. Morphometric measurements were carried out on populations of the yam nematode S. bradys using compound microscope attached to a computer. The survey revealed that farmers were aware of the tuber dry rot disease, but were however, ignorant about the causes and the spread of the disease, so planting materials were not treated before use. Twelve genera belonging to seven nematode families of order Rhabdida and

Dorylaimida were identified in yam rhizosphere soils and nine genera in stored yam tubers. These were Scutellonema spp., Meloidogyne spp. Longidorus spp., Tylenchulus spp., Helicotylenchus spp., Ditylenchus spp., Heterodera spp., Pratylenchus spp., Rotylenchus spp., Appenlenchoides spp., Paratylenchus spp., and Bursaphelenchoides spp., The predominant nematodes Scutellonema

ii

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

spp., Meloidogyne spp. and Pratylenchus were present in both soil and yam tuber peels. There were low populations of other nematode genera. The most frequently detected genus was

Scutellonema bradys (131) per 200cc of soil and (34086) in 10 gram tubers peels. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering (AHC) revealed 5 groups at a dismilarity of 90%, however sub groups formed at dissimilarity value of 5% Significant morphology variation is present in female S. bradys population.

iii

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DECLARATION ...... i ABSTRACT ...... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ...... iv LISTS OF TABLES ...... vii LISTS OF FIGURES ...... viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ...... i DEDICATION...... ii CHAPTER ONE ...... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Problem statement ...... 2 1.2 Justification ...... 3 The objectives of the study were to ...... 4 CHAPTER TWO ...... 5 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW ...... 5 2.1. Yam Production ...... 5 2.2 Constrains to yam production ...... 5 2.3 Plant Parasitic Nematodes...... 6 2.4. Factors influencing distribution of nematodes ...... 8 2.5 The yam nematode Scutellonema bradys ...... 9 2.5.1 and nomenclature ...... 9 2.5.2 Order ...... 10 2.5.3 Importance of Scutellonema bradys in yam cultivation ...... 11 2.5.4 Biology and ecology of Scutellonema bradys ...... 12 2.5.5 Life cycle of Scutellonema bradys ...... 13 2.5.6 Symptoms and diagnosis ...... 13 2.5.7 Host range of Scutellonema bradys ...... 14 2.5.8 Morphological identification ...... 14 2.5.9 Morphometric identification ...... 16

iv

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

2. 6 Nematode disease management ...... 16 2.6.1 Phytosanitary measures ...... 16 2.6.2 Agronomic practices on the field ...... 17 2.6.3 Biological control...... 17 2.6.4 Nematicides ...... 18 2.6.5 Physical control ...... 18 2.6.6 Resistance of yam tubers to S. bradys ...... 18 2.6.7 Integrated pest management ...... 19 CHAPTER THREE ...... 20 3.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS ...... 20 3.1 Survey to assess farmers, knowledge, perception and experiences concerning occurrence and management of nematodes ...... 20 3.2 Soil Sampling ...... 20 3.3 Nematodes extraction from the soil ...... 23 3.4 Sampling of Yam tubers in storage ...... 23 3.5 Extraction of nematodes from yam tubers ...... 24 3.6 Quantitative analysis of nematodes ...... 25 3.7 Handling and processing of nematodes ...... 25 3.7.1 Nematode identification ...... 26 3.8 Morphological characterization of Scutellonema spp...... 26 3.8.1 Morphological observations and morphometries...... 26 CHAPTER FOUR ...... 29 4.0 RESULTS ...... 29 4.1 Farmers’ knowledge, perceptions, and experiences concerning occurrences and management of dry rot disease of yam tubers in Krachi Nchumuru District of the Volta Region of Ghana ..... 29 4.1.1 Background of Yam (Diocorea rotundata) Farmers in the study area ...... 29 4.1.1.1 Age and sex of Respondent ...... 29 4. 1.3 Source of seed yam used by farmers ...... 31 4.1.4 Farmers farm size in the year 2016 ...... 32 4.1.6 Land use intensity of yam farmers in the Krachi Nchumuru District ...... 34 4.1.10 Farmers knowledge, perception and experiences concerning prevalence of dry rot disease of yam of farm ...... 37

v

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

4.1.15. Farmers knowledge on symptoms of nematode parasitism of yam tubers in storage in the Krachi Nchumuru District of the Volta Region ...... 40 4.1.17 Farmers knowledge, perception and experiences concerning the spread of nematodes infestation of yam tuber in the field and storage ...... 41 4.1.18 Economic impact of nematodes associated with stored yam tubers ...... 42 4.1.19. Postharvest losses of harvested yam due to nematodes ...... 43 4.2 Genera of plant parasitic nematodes associated with soils in yam rhizosphere soil and stored yam tubers ...... 45 4.2.1. Nematodes genera associated with soil in yam rhizosphere ...... 45 4.2.2 Nematode genera associated with stored yam...... 46 4.3.1 Rotylenchulus spp...... 47 4.3.2 Melodoigyne spp...... 47 4.3.3 Pratylenchus spp...... 47 4.3.4. Tylenchulums spp...... 48 4.3.5 Scutellonema spp...... 48 4.3.6 Helicotylenchus spp...... 49 4.4.1 Frequency of occurrence of plant parasitic nematodes rhizosphere soil ...... 50 4.4.2 Mean densities of nematodes rhizosphere soil ...... 52 4.4.3. Densities of plant parasitic nematodes associated with stored yam ...... 54 4.5. Morphometric characteristics of female Scutellonema bradys ...... 57 CHAPTER FIVE ...... 68 5.0 DISCUSSION ...... 68 CHAPTER 6 ...... 72 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 72 Conclusions ...... 72 6.2 Recommendations ...... 73

vi

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

LISTS OF TABLES

Table 1: Global positioning systems (GSP)coordinates of the communities where the study was conducted ...... 22

Table 2. Gender of yam farmers in the Krachi Nchumuru District ...... 29

Table 3: Crops used in intercropping with yam ...... 35

Table 4. Period of land fallow practiced by yam farmers ...... 36

Table 5. Farmer’s knowledge on symptoms of nematode parasitism of yam plants in Krachi

Nchumuru District ...... 39

Table 6. Farmer’s knowledge on symptoms of nematode parasitism on yam tubers in storage in the Krachi Nchumuru District of the Volta Region ...... 41

Table 7. Measures perceived by farmers to be effective for control of yam nematode on tubers 42

Table 8. Influence of dry rot of yam tubers on socio economic activities of farmers in Krachi

Nchumuru ...... 45

Table 9. Plant parasitic nematodes extracted from soil in yam rhizosphere in the Krachi Nchumuru

District of the Volta Region...... 46

Table 10. Relative abundance of nematode in the 200cc of soil in yam rhizosphere ...... 52

Table 11. Mean densities of Nematodes from soil 200 cc in yam rhizosphere in the

KrachiNchumuru District...... 53

Table 12. Occurrence and relative abundance of plant parasitic nematodes associated with 50g of yam tubers in storage ...... 55

Table 13. Mean densities of nematodes from yam tubers in storage in Krachi Nchumuru District

...... 56

Table 14. Morphometrics of Scutellonema bradys females from Krachi Nchumuru District ...... 58

vii

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

LISTS OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Nematode extraction from yam tuber peels using Maceration and Baerman funnel method...... 25

Figure 2. Age distribution of yam farmers in the Krachi Nchumuru District...... 30

4.1.2. Period in yam farming ...... 31

Figure 4. Period in yam farming ...... 31

Figure 5. Source of planting materials for yam farmers ...... 32

...... 33

Figure 6. Farmers farm size in 2016 ...... 33

Figure 8. Duration of continuous cultivation of yam on same piece of land by farmers ...... 35

Figure 10. Knowledge about causal agent of dry rot disease of yam ...... 37

Figure 11. Varieties of white yam mostly cultivated by farmers in the Krachi Nchumuru District

...... 38

Figure 11. Type of Soil associated with nematode parasitism of yam tubers ...... 39

Figure 12. Method of storage of yam tubers after harvest ...... 40

Figure 13. Reason for cultivating yam by farmers ...... 43

Figure 14. Losses of yam tubers incurred by farmers from dry rot from 2013 to 2016...... 44

Figure 15. Pratylenchus spp. (Juvenile) ...... 48

Figure 16. Female Scutellonema bradys ...... 49

Figure 17. Helicotylenchus spp...... 50

Figure 19. Population of nematodes extracted from peels of yam tuber ...... 54

Figure 20. Micrograph showing morphometric features of S. bradys, (A)stylet length and diameter at head region diameter (B) tail length ...... 61

viii

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Figure 21. Micrograph showing morphometric features of S. bradys, (C) Stylet (D) diameter at mid body...... 62

Figure 22. Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (AHC) of nematodes from ten communities in

Krachi Nchumuru District...... 67

ix

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I thank almighty God for giving me life and good health for making this work possible. I sincerely thank my supervisors Dr. E.W. Cornelius and Dr. S. T. Nyaku for their encouragements suggestion and directions. My gratitude also goes to Mr Samuel Osabutey and Mr. W. Asante all of the Crop

Science Department. I also thank Mr. Hanif Lutuf of Madina for his encouragement. I sincerely appreciate the warm reception and the help given to me by the staff of Department of Agriculture,

Krachi Nchumuru District Assembly, especially Mr. Abusah Kplorla for his enormous help during the field work.

May Almighty God bless them all.

i

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my wife Salamatu and my lovely children.

ii

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

CHAPTER ONE

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Food security exist when all people, at all times have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life” (FAO World Food summit, 1996: Halweil, 2002) also defined a nation as food secure, when a country is able to produce enough to feed its citizens awaiting the next harvesting season and readily export the surplus to other nations. One of such food security crops in West Africa is edible yam which feeds over 70 million people (FAO, 2012). It is a very diverse crop covering many species of Discorea (Degras 1993). It is among root and tuber crops which contribute to 31% of all food produced in the world (Paulino and Yeung,1981). It is an important starch and protein staple for people of West Africa and many communities across other parts of Africa, Asia, South and Central America the Caribbean and the Pacific (FAO 1994; FAO 2012).

Yam is also an important socio-cultural crop which is prominent in many cultural and religious festivals of people of West Africa (Tetteh and Saakwa, 1994). Many species also have high medicinal value apart from their food value (Karnick, 1969 Degras, 1993). Yam is the second most cultivated root and tuber crop in Ghana after cassava (Manihot utilisima) in terms of production and food security (Robertson and Lupien, 2008). In 2013 total production of yam in Ghana was

6,638,867 metric tonnes out of which Volta Region produced 463,559 MT representing 6.98%

(MOFA, SRID, 2013). Krachi Nchumuru District of the Volta Region produced about half of the region’s output.

1

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

1.1 Problem statement

Despite the importance of yam, it is attacked by many insect pests and pathogens of which yam nematodes Scutellonema bradys (Steiner and LeHew, 1933; Andrassy 1958) is of importance. The situation is a worry to farmers and traders because affected tubers become unmarketable

(Cornelius, 2011). This nematode is also threat to cassava (Bridge et al., 2005) and (Coyne et al.,2006) which appear to be suitable host. Infected yam tubers mostly have a cracked or flaky surface, under which nematodes feed endo parasitically, destroying cell walls as they multiply and migrate intracellularly, forming cavities and tissue necrosis which turn from brown to black as the disease progress, these symptoms are more severe as the length of storage increases (Coyne et al.,

2006). S. bradys destruction of yam also depends on level of infection, crop genotype, and soil conditions. (Bridge et al., 2005). Infested yam tubers in storage lose weight of 0 to 80% compared to healthy tubers (Adesiyan et al., 1977). This nematode infestation has resulted in high post- harvest losses leading to scarcity of yam during the storage period. It also has negative impact on the livelihood of these farmers. In order to reduce these losses, an estimated amount of US$500 million was spent on general nematode control on all crops globally (Keren-Zur et al., 2000).

Nematodes are difficult to control pest and are considered to be the most destructive in the kingdom metazoan in tropical and subtropical countries (Simpson and Starr, 2001).

In Ghana, Scutellonema infestation of yam tubers is a major hindrance to yam production

(Kwoseh, 2008). They cause serious damage to yam quality at the fields, in storage and markets and farmers do not use pesticides to control the nematodes. There are chemicals to treat nematodes because some crops cannot be grown economically without the use of nematicide (Hemeng, 1981;

Sikora and Fernandez, 2005).

2

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Nematicides such as 1, 3-D and Carbofuran at 5kg ai/ha was recommended for the control of root- knot nematodes in the northern savanna and transitional zones of Ghana for vegetables such as tomatoes. The limitation in the use of these nematicides on the field crops in the developing countries are due to the subsistence nature of many farmers (Luc et al., 2005), high prices of this nematicides (Freckman and Sasser, 1987) and banning from most of the world markets of the fumigants D-D, ethylene dibromide and dibromochloropropene (Luc et al., 2005). The banning of the most effective fumigant methyl bromide, due to its negative effect on the ozone layer, has serious consequences on Ghanaian farmers especially yam producers. Modifying existing agricultural practices such that nematodes populations in the soils can be reduced can be alternatives to synthetic nematicide in tropical Africa (Starr et al., 2001).

Crop rotation can decrease the nematodes population in the soil and therefore reduce number of infested yams in both storage and in the market, biological control can be a successful alternative in future (Evans et al., 1993). The environment can be manipulated to promote biological activity for the near future (Starr et al., 2001). It is, therefore important to look for other methods of control to maintain nematode infestation below economic threshold.

1.2 Justification

The inadequate knowledge about nematodes may be the reason the dry rot disease is common in yam growing areas of Ghana (Nyaku, et al, 2016). Soil nematode distribution and importance have been studied (Addoh, 1971) and nematodes have also been found associated with stored yam

(Kwoseh et al., 2005). From available literature, there is no study on farmers’ perception, knowledge and management of dry rot disease of yam tubers as well as accurate identification of the causal organism using morphological features and morphometric analysis. The study was done

3

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

to identify and establish the incidence of the causal organism in yam fields and storage facilities in Krachi Nchumuru District of the Volta Region.

The objectives of the study were to

1. Assess knowledge, perception and experiences of farmers in Krachi Nchumuru District

on the occurrence and management of dry rot disease of tubers of white yam.

2. Identify and assess population of nematode genera on tubers of white yam (D. rotudanta)

3. Determine variation within and among population of S. bradys using morphometric

analysis.

4

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

CHAPTER TWO

2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1. Yam Production

Yam Discorea spp. and cassava Manihot utilissima are tuber and roots crops produced significantly in West Africa with annual quantities of 24.4 and 51 million tons respectively. These represent 96% and 40% of world production respectively (Korth 1993). It is major source of income for farmers and traders. Throughout the world yam is extensively used but it’s used vary from one country to the other (Degras, 1993). In West Africa yam is grown in well drained sandy loam and fertile soils. Land preparation is done either by ploughing with a tractor or using a hand hoe. Yam is planted either on a mound or a ridge using seed yam or yam setts. It is planted at a distance of 30-40cm on a ridge at 1metre apart. It could also be planted on mounds 1metre apart.

In Ghana yam is planted in all the Regions of the country except Greater Accra and Upper East

Regions (MOFA SRID, 2014).

2.2 Constrains to yam production

Yam production is affected by several constrains and some of these factors are unavailability and high cost of planting materials, pests and diseases, poor soil fertility, high labour cost, erratic rainfall pattern leading drought and water logging. Nematodes, insects, vertebrates and diseases are the most important impediments to yam production both in the field and storage (Osagie, 1992).

Yam tuber rots are the highest losses in storage resulting from infection with micro-organisms such as nematodes, fungi, and bacteria (Knoth,1993). Some strains of pathogenic fungi can

5

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

penetrate the yam tuber directly, which is then followed by others. Other fungi pathogens penetrate through lesion, cuts, holes bored by rodents and nematodes. It is known that the pathogens infect yam tubers in the field and in the storage (Ogundana et al., 1970, 1971). Yam tubers have no protective cuticle and the corky periderm and meristematic tissues are few millimetres thick, therefore, damage to the surface requires only a slight force to breech these barriers (Osage, 1992).

At harvest and during handling yam tubers may be damaged to a certain degree, the site of excision of the tuber from the aerial plant and any other injury, cuts or abrasion no matter small can provide point of entry for wound pathogen (Pasam et al., 1976). Many authors have also observed that fungi pathogens can enter into the tuber if there are pre-existing physical damage (Cornelius,1998;

Morse et al., 2000).

Various types of rots have been identified on yam tubers and these are characterised as dry, watery and soft rot depending on the consistency of the rotten tissue. Some bacteria also cause rots (Centre for overseas Pest Research, 1978) and rots can infect part of the tuber or a whole tuber. Rots normally affect the tuber consistency, colour and flavour making it no longer suitable for consumption, and also reduce its market value. Dry rot disease of yam tubers is caused by nematode Scutellonema bradys which are migratory endo plant parasitic nematodes (Coyne et al.,

2006).

2.3 Plant Parasitic Nematodes

Many nematode species have been found to be associated with yam and the most important is

Scutenollema bradys which cause dry rot disease. Lesion nematode Pratylenchus spp. and root knot nematode Meloidogyne spp. have also been found to be associated with root and tubers

(Bridge and Page 1984; Bridge et al., 2005). In other parts of the world (apart from West Africa

6

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

where yams are grown) Pratylenchus caffeae is the most serious nematode of yam (Bridge et al.,

2005).

Nematodes are considered to be the most abundant and numerous on earth. They are either free-living or parasitic organisms of plants or animals and are present in almost all possible habitats including under the oceans. (Neher et al.,2010) Nematodes are aquatic organisms and their movement depends on moisture. Plant parasitic nematodes are obligate parasites that complete their life cycle partially or entirely in the soil environment in association with plant roots and therefore destroy plant tissue during feeding. They feed on all parts of vascular plants but the most economically important species infect roots and tubers (Hunt et al., 2005). Plant parasitic nematodes exhibit three types of parasitism, i) ecto-parasitism, ii) semi endo-parasitism and iii) endo-parasitism. Some are migratory endo-parasites which means they spend parts of their life cycle in the soil while parts are in the host organism. Others such as Meloidogyne spp. are sedentary endo-parasites. The endoparasitic and semi- endoparasitic nematodes induce sophisticated trophic systems of nurse cells or sincytia in their host (Hunt et al., 2005). Plants whose root system are affected by nematodes show symptoms such as stunting, chlorosis

(yellowing of leaves, wilting, drying due to shortage of moisture) and most importantly from an economic stand point, reduced yields. The symptoms in aerial part of the plants are due to the poor ability of the root system to deliver water and nutrients hence the chlorosis and therefore wilting. Symptoms induced by nematodes are normally confused with water and nutrients deficiencies (Coyne, 2006). This is because the vascular system of the plants is affected by their feeding behaviour and therefore nutrient and water translocations are impeded. In all areas where crops are grown problems associated with plant-parasitic nematodes are present; however, the most severe damages occur in the tropics or sub-tropics due to the elevated temperatures,

7

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

continuous cropping patterns, long growing seasons, large number of susceptible crops and alternative host plants which will gradually increase the nematode populations year by year (Mai,

1985). Agriculture intensification due to increase in population and pressure on land use has resulted in promoting favourable conditions for plant parasitic nematodes. (Elgawad et al., 2007).

Agrios, (2005) estimated that plant-parasitic nematodes are responsible for global agricultural losses close to $80 billion. In the West African sub-region, the severity of plant parasitic nematodes has been documented. Losses in the range of 20-94% due to nematodes have been recorded in Nigeria (Olowe, 1978; Duponnois et al., 1995). Scutellonema bradys is reported species parasitizing on yam tubers in West Africa. In Ghana, Osei et al., (2012) also observed populations of plant parasitic nematodes parasiting tomatoes of which root knot nematode

(Meloidogyne incognita) is the most important species. Other nematode genera reported on yam in Ghana include Helicotylenchus spp., Paratylenchus spp., Tylenchus spp., Hoplolaimus spp. and

Xiphinema spp. (Osei et al., 2012; Nyaku, et al.,2015).

2.4. Factors influencing distribution of nematodes

Population density and the distribution of plant parasitic nematodes are influenced by various factors which include biotic and abiotic sources (Wachira et al., 2009). Farming practices such as addition of organic matter and application of organic amendment in form of manure in the soil suppresses nematodes by generating toxic compounds in the soil that are harmful to the nematodes

(Norton, 1979). Soil texture also influences the population density of nematodes (Norton, 1979).

Soils which are loose and have high porosity, support large population of plant parasitic nematodes as a result of improved aeration and mobility of nematodes in the soil (Sultan and Ferris,1991).

Plant parasitic nematodes are able to multiply in moist soils. Moisture enables mobility and infection of appropriate host by nematodes (Ferris et al.,1991) and temperature also influence

8

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

nematodes activity (Norton, 1979). Most nematodes are active between 25-30° C. So there is high density of plant parasitic nematodes along the tropical and sub-tropical regions which normal temperatures lie within the above temperatures. These factors however, do not work independently to influence nematode population but are interrelated.

The most important nematode of yam is Scutellonema bradys which is the causal agent of dry rot disease of yam tuber (Coyne et al.,2006). Most severe symptoms of dry rot are observed during storage (Baimey et al., 2009). Decay symptoms begin with brown or black lesions beneath the outer skin where it progresses into the tuber, as nematodes feed and multiply endo parasitically, it progresses into the tuber causing the infected tissues to turn black or brown (Coyne et al., 2006).

The yam tuber may appear healthy while the outer cortex may crack and flake off. The severity of above symptoms increases as the length of storage increases (Coyne et al., 2006; Baimey et al.,

2009).

Loses from 25 to 75 % has been recorded in Nigeria where yam tubers were stored for only 16 weeks due to nematodes (Nwauzor and Fawole, 1981). The disease is a trait to yam production because the vegetative materials used (yam sett or seed yam) perpetuate the disease cycle from one season to the other which will lead to decline in yam production (Bridge, 1982; Florini, 1996).

Storage losses up to 80% has also been recorded (Nwauzor, 1982)

2.5 The yam nematode Scutellonema bradys

2.5.1 Taxonomy and nomenclature

Yam nematode was first described in Jamaica in Rotylenchus1933 (Steiner and Hew 1933) it was classified into the genus haplolaimus (Steiner and Hew 1933). And later changed to Rotylenchus

9

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

It was again described from Haplolaimus to Rotylenchus in 1952. (Goodey, 1952) In 1971 it was reclassified as Scutellonema. (Andrassy,1958; Morgan, 1971)

Scheme of Classification

Kingdom: Metazoa

Plylum: Nemada Cobb, 1919

Class: Secrernetea von Lionstow, 1905

Subclass: Diplogasteria Maggenti, 1982

Order: Tylenchida Thorn, 1949

Sub order: Tylinchina Chitwood, 1950

Super family:Tylenchoidea Orley ,1880

Family: Hoplolamainae Flip’ev, 1934

Genus: Scutellonema Adrassy, 1958

Species: Scutellonema bradys (Steiner and LeHew, 1933: Andrassy 1958)

Source (Morgan, 1971)

2.5.2 Order Tylenchida

Three groups of plants parasitic nematodes (PPN) known are, Tylenchs, Longidorids and

Trichodorids (Luc et al., 1990). Most of these (PPN) belongs to the Order Tylenchida. Prominent among them are;Heteroderidae, , (Scutellonema and heterodera belongs to this family)Pratylenchidae, Meloidogynidae etc (Hunt et al.,2005). Members of this group are vermiform nematodes although some of the genera such as Meloidogyne, Heterodera and

10

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Globodera the female loses vermiform and becomes obsessed and sexual dimophism can also occur. Their body length is normally between 0.2 to 1 mm. Under certain conditions the length can be over 3 mm. Nematodes from this Order have stomatostylet, a protrusible culticular tube generally swelling posteriorly to form a basal knob. This knob may be rounded as in Pratylenchus.

The knob could also be tulip shaped with anterior tooth-like projections as in Hoplolaimus (Luc, et al., 1990; Siddiqi, 2000). Members of the Order Tylinchida have a complete digestive system which comprise of stylet, esophagus, intestine and rectum. In identification of nematodes the type of esophagus and intestine overlap is vital. In Scutellonema, Radopholus, and Hoplolaimus spp. the esophagus overlaps intestine dorsally. In Pratylenchus and Helicotylenchus the overlap is ventral (Hunt et al., 2005).

Females possess a reproductive structure which comprises of vagina, uterus, oviduct and ovary.

Spermatheca a specialised reproductive organ may be present. The genital system of a female may be either didelphic or monodelphic. The position of vulva is significant for identification, if the vulva position is posterior (60%-70%) in Helicotylenchus and median in Radopholus spp. The shapes of the tail tip tend to vary within members of this group of nematodes. Some are dorsally convexconoid or hemispherical as in Helicotylenchus, others are elongated as is the case with

Radopholus while other are conical in shape (Hunt et al., 2005; Jabbari and Niknam, 2006). These features are significant in nematode identification.

2.5.3 Importance of Scutellonema bradys in yam cultivation

This is a major pest of yam, in yam growing areas of Senegal, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, Togo, Benin,

Nigeria and Cameroun (what is known as yam zone in West Africa). However, this pest is not an economic pest in other parts of the world notably the Caribbean (Puerto Rico, Cuba and Jamaica)

11

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Brazil, India and Japan (Bridge et al., 2005). Almost all edible yam cultivated in the yam zone of

West Africa are susceptible to Scutellonema bradys. The direct damage of this nematode is of economic importance although it is difficult to determine damage associated with loss in total yield

(Coyne et al., 2006). It causes reduction in quality, edible portions are reduced and thereby affecting its marketability. Bridge (1972) reported that almost 47% of all tubers on sale in markets in Nigeria are infected with S. bradys. In Ghana, Kwoseh et al. (2005) found that yam tubers in storage are all infected with S. bradys irrespective of the variety.

2.5.4 Biology and ecology of Scutellonema bradys

Scutellonema bradys, the yam nematode is a microscopic organism with total body length of

820µm -1040µm. It has stylet length of 16µm-29 µm (Goodey,1952 Sher 1964 Siddique 1972) It has de Mans ratio ‘a’ (body length/ diameter at mid body) 19µm-30µm (Germani et al., 1985). It has round tail of about 6.5µm -33µm (Siddique, 1972). Amphimictic reproduction is observed in

S. brady where eggs are produced in the soil, roots and tubers by mature female nematode (Tchabi,

2008). First molting occurs in the egg, four moltings and four juvenile stages are recorded (Kwoseh and Krampah, 2008). In Nigeria population build up to 200 nematodes per gram of soil has been recorded (Bridge, 1972) and S. bradys population of 7824 in 10 g of yam tuber peels has also been recorded (Nyaku et al., 2016). Sites of S. bradys invasion is through the root tips and can also enter tubers though the growing points. They also invade through cracks and damaged areas of roots and tubers. They feed intracellularly in yam tuber tissues which result in rupturing of cell walls and loss of its content which create tunnels and cavities in the tubers for other organisms (Bridge,

1972; Bridge, 2005; Coyne et al., 2011).

12

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

2.5.5 Life cycle of Scutellonema bradys

Scutellonema is a. thread nematode found in the soils. It is a migratory endo-parasitic nematode present in the soils where yam is cultivated. They are bisexual, that is they exist as a separate male and female. When reproduction occurs the ovum from the female is fertilized by the sperm of the male. Infective stages of S. bradys are from J2, J3 and J4. First moulting occurs in the egg and there are four juvenile stages before adult. The juvenile nematodes invade young developing yam tubers, roots and also through cracks and damage parts of the tuber (Bridge 1972; Coyne et al., 2011).

This nematode is mostly confined to the peridermal and subdermal and parenchyma tissues in the outer 1 to 2 cm of the yam tuber. S. bradys continues to feed and reproduce within the yam tuber tissues even after harvesting. The yam nematode feeds by sucking out cell contents of the plant with their stylet and move ahead leaving lesions behind. They create wounds by their feeding action and secondary infection can occur by bacterial and fungi which normally result in soft rot.

They are able to move into the soil in search of new tuber or root. The nematode grow and moult from J2 three times to become adult male or female. If there are unfavourable weather conditions during drought the nematode become quiescence until moisture increases and it resume growth

(Coyne et al., 2011).

2.5.6 Symptoms and diagnosis

The major disease caused by S. bradys is called the dry rot of yam tuber (Coyne et al., 2005) It occurs in the outer two to three centimetre of the tuber which has been infected with S. bradys. In this disease, the initial stage after infection is light yellow lesions below the skin of the yam tuber without showing any external symptoms initially (Baimy, 2006; Humphrey, 2014). As the disease progresses, the external parts of the tuber flakes off exposing patches of dark brown dry tissues.

13

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

The disease affects 1 to 2 cm of the tuber but this can go deeper and the tuber will turn into yellow colouration. There has not been reported case of any foliar symptoms of S. bradys infected soil

(Bridge,1994).

2.5.7 Host range of Scutellonema bradys

S. bradys has number of alternative hosts which make them to survive in soils in the absence of yam. The nematode can survive in any soil in the yam growing soils across West Africa (Coyne et al., 2006). It has also been reported that in the Carribean islands of Jamaica, Pueto Rico and Costa

Rica it has wide host range so it survives without yam. In South America, it has been reported in

Brasil (Bridge et al., 2005; Humphrey et al., 2010). All edible Dioscorea are affected while crops such okra, yam bean, , kenaf, sorghum, , cassava and are also affected

(Kwoseh and Krampah, 2008).

2.5.8 Morphological identification

In the Kingdom metazoanthe phylum nematoda is one of the most abundant group on earth in terms of species richness. Nematodes constitute about 90% of all multicellular organisms. I n marine ecosystem alone about one hundred million species which have not been described, only

26,646 species have been described from all habitats (Lamshead, 1993; Hugot et al., 2001). In identification of Scutellonema bradys scanning electron microscope is used for accuracy. (Nguyen

2010). Although light microscope has been used for morphological characters but the light microscope has its limitations (Coomans, 2000). It is very difficult to separate the genus

Scutellonema because the 46 species have overlapping morphological characters at species level

(Sidiqqi, 2000; Van de Berg et al., 2003). To identify species accurately, various dichotomous

14

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

keys have designed and used. These include: Filipev (1936); Chitwood (1951); Andrassy (1976);

Fortuner (1986) and Sidiqqi (2000).

Some of morphological characters used to separate Scutellonema species are;

Total body length

Specimen width

Position of vulva to anterior

DEGO

Diameter at anus

Vledian bulb valve length

Median bulb valve

Scutellum with

Scutellum height

Lip region height

Lip region diameter

Lip annule shape

Pharynx length

Diameter at head region

Diameter at mid body

Diameter at tail region

Tail length

Stylet length

The de man’s ratios (a, b, c, c’, s)

Source Siddique (2000) Van de Berg et al., (2013), Jamani (2015).

15

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

2.5.9 Morphometric identification

Scutellonema has large and raised lateral lips whereas sub median lips are narrow and flat or knoblike which obsect by constriction, lip region is knob like and obsect by conscription with labial disc and 6 to 8 striations. The organ for locomotion and copulation is the tail and the tail tip is bluntly concoid, the tail is shorter or equal to the body width. Tail is rounded with striation terminus. The annules are about 1.6 µm near the middle. Vulva is traverse slit with circular thicken toward ends (Nyaku et al., 2016).

The males have large bursa, crenate enclosing tail and the specules slightly cephalated which is ventrally arcuate which have large distal fingures, telamon is prominent and is about 10µm long, terminal portion of the tail is about 11-16 µm long (Sidiqqi, 2000; Van de Berg et al., 2003).

2. 6 Nematode disease management

2.6.1 Phytosanitary measures

The first method that could be employed in nematode management in yam against Scutellonema spp. is the use of clean and healthy planting material that is the use of uninfected yam setts. Healthy planting materials can be obtained through tissue culture. Also at harvest all infected materials should be separated from the lot and discarded. (Dropkin, 1980; Speijer et al.,2000). Some varieties of yam can be propagated by vines. This can be done to produce yam setts which are nematode free for planting but not tubers. (Coursey, 1967; IITA,2005). Minisets’ technology can also be used to produce nematode free planting materials devoid of nematodes (IITA, 2007)

16

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

2.6.2 Agronomic practices on the field

Fallowing a field for about 24 months can reduce nematodes population in the soil (Adesiyan,

1976). Increased in the consumption of yam has led to increase in yam cultivation, therefore high land use intensity so it is becoming impossible for land fallow in the yam growing areas for about

24 months (Kwoseh and Krampah, 2008). Where it is practicable crop rotation with poor host such as groundnut and maize could be rotated. The use of antagonistic and trap crops is also used to reduce nematode population in the soil.

Including mucuna, alfafa and pueraria in the rotation also reduce nematode especially

Scutellonema bradys population density in the soil (Tchabi, 2008). Super phosphate fertilizers are also reported to have reduced nematodes population in the soil (Garrido et al., 2008; Osei et al.,

2011). Traditionally wood ash is used to treat yam setts before planting and this is reported to decrease nematode population in the soil. (Adesiyan and Adeniji, 1976; Diby,2004). Removal of alternative host plants after harvest, especially those with underground food storage can decrease nematodes population in the soil (Luc et al., 2005 Sikora and Fernandez, 2005)

2.6.3 Biological control

The use of microorganisms to control nematodes will be a way and alternatives to the use of nematicides due environmental problems and also harmeful of nematicides to non-target organisms (Viaenne et al., 2003). Research has proven that some fungi such as Pachonia chlamydosporium and Pacellomyces lilacinus are nematophagus (Gaspard et al.,1990).

17

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

2.6.4 Nematicides

Nematicides such as carbofuran and organophosphates can be used successfully against nematodes on yam but these chemicals are very toxic to non-target organisms including the user and also not bio degradable and therefore persistent in the environment. As a result, its use has been restricted in some countries. However, its application at 100kg/ hectare can result in optimal yield and reduction in nematode population in the soil (Adegbite and Abgage, 2006)

2.6.5 Physical control Dipping yam setts in hot water at a temperature of 50- 55oC for 45 minutes will ensure nematode free setts without destroying the yam setts (IITA, 2005). However, farmers are reluctant to practice this method due to the bulky nature of yam setts and the volumes of yam tubers to be treated will be a problem. Another challenge is how to control and maintain the temperature of the hot water.

Nematode population and the depth of infestation on the yam tuber also affect this method.

2.6.6 Resistance of yam tubers to S. bradys Resistance of yam tubers to nematodes, S. bradys is yet to be reported in the cultivated yam (IITA,

2004). There may be resistance varieties in the wild yam but due to complex nature of yam botany there have not been any breeding programme to breed the resistance line (Coursey, 1967).

Breeding of resistance varieties could be the most economical way of producing yam commercially

(Brandson, 2001). Some varieties of Diascorea cayennesis and Diascorea dumentorum have shown some resistance to S. bradys (Bridge, 1982 and Kwoseh, 2000)

18

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

2.6.7 Integrated pest management

Several methods of controlling yam nematodes, S. bradys could be used in an integrated method.

Using phytosanitary measures such as hot water treatment, the use of wood ash, application of phosphoric fertilizers, crop rotation and land fallowing produced successful results against the yam nematode S. bradys at IITA field trials in Ibadan Nigeria (IITA, 2005).

19

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

CHAPTER THREE

3.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1 Survey to assess farmers, knowledge, perception and experiences concerning occurrence and management of nematodes

A field survey was conducted in December, 2016 to obtain baseline data concerning farmers’ land use intensity, knowledge, perception, experiences, and management of plant- parasitic nematodes on their farms. Initial focal group discussion was held with Agricultural Extension Agents (AEAs) in the Krachi Nchumuru District (plate 2). Ten communities where yam is grown were selected.

The communities are Borae, Malla, Chinderi, Banda, Zongo Micheri, Kaliako Boafori, Kokorse

Bejamse and Grubi. A total of fifty (50) yam farmers with varying farm sizes ranging from one (1) acre to twenty (20) or more acres were randomly selected from the study area. Pre- tested semi- structured questionnaires were administered to participating farmers by reading to them and also showing them pictures. Data collected in the questionnaire were coded and subjected to descriptive statistical analysis using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.

3.2 Soil Sampling

Two farms each from the Ten (10) communities were sampled around yam tuber rhizosphere. Sampling of soils were undertaken in October 2016 as this period coincides with maturity of yam in the district. The soil samples were taken when the soil was not too wet or too dry as both extreme conditions make it difficult to collect and prepare samples for analysis (Shurtleff and Averre, 2000).

The soil samples from 10 communities were taken using soil augur from the depths of approximately 0-30 cm. The soil samples were taking around yam tubers in two farms per community. (Z) form was used in taking the samples in each farm. GPS coordinates were recorded in each farm. The soil augur and footwear were cleaned after sampling each farm to avoid cross contamination of soil samples and spread of nematodes

20

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

between farms. The location of farm was logged into the field notebook with the sample number and GPS coordinate of the farm recorded (Table 1).

21

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Table 1: Global positioning systems (GSP)coordinates of the communities where the study was conducted

S/N Town Latitude Longitude

1 Malla 8˚ 8.8ˡN 0 ˚ 1.3ˡW

2 Borae 8 ˚ 9.4ˡN 0 ˚ 2.3ˡW

3 Banda 8 ˚ 18.1ˡN 0 ˚ 5.4ˡW

4 Zongo Michire 8 ˚ 12.1ˡN 0 ˚ 7.9ˡW

5 Chinderi 8 ˚ 8.6ˡN 0 ˚ 9.1ˡW

6 Grubi 8 ˚ 11.5ˡN 0 ˚ 13.9ˡW

7 Korkose 8 ˚ 9.3ˡN 0 ˚ 10.7ˡW

8 Bejamse 8 ˚ 3.8ˡN 0 ˚ 13.5ˡW

9 Kaliako 8 ˚ 5.0ˡN 0 ˚ 9.9ˡW

22

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

The soil samples from each farm was thoroughly mixed for nematode extraction. The soil samples were placed in polythene bags and put in an envelope and the date, location written using a permanent ink pen and record immediately logged.

3.3 Nematodes extraction from the soil

Nematodes were extracted from the soil using sucrose centrifugation method (Freckman, 1997).

Sucrose solution was prepared by dissolving 454 g of sugar in distilled water and the volume made up to one litre. The soil samples were mixed and passed through coarse sieves to remove rocks and roots debris. From each soil sample 200 cubic centimetre (cm3) subsample of soil was collected into a beaker and weighed. Tap water was added to twice its volume and stirred carefully and allowed to settle for three minutes. It was poured through a stack of 90 µm - aperture mesh on a

36 µm - aperture mesh. Using a water bottle, nematodes (retained on the mesh) were gently washed into centrifugation tubes for centrifugation.

Water was added to centrifuge tubes to equalize volumes and placed in balanced pairs. It was spinned at 1700 rpm for five minutes without using the brake and allowed to settle for five minutes.

Supernatant was aspirated to about one (1) cm above the pellet. The tubes were filled with sucrose solution at room temperature and stirred with a spatula to break up the pellet. The sample was spinned up to 1000 rpm for one minute. The supernatant was poured through the 36 µm - aperture mesh sieve and transferred into labelled vials up to the 10mL mark using a fine spray water bottle.

3.4 Sampling of Yam tubers in storage

This sampling was done on yam in storage in February 2017. This was the period harvested yam were in storage. Three yam tubers each showing symptoms of S. bradys were collected from 20

23

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

farmers, labelled and send to the Plant Pathology Laboratory of Crop Science Department

University of Ghana, Legon for extraction and identification of nematodes.

3.5 Extraction of nematodes from yam tubers

Nematodes were extracted from infested yam tubers using modified Baermann funnel method

(Hooper, 1990). The tubers were peeled using kitchen peeler and cut into (0.3cm x 0.5cm) 10g sub sample was used for nematode extraction. The 10g was blended for five second seconds and put into a glass funnel lined with tissue paper placed on a wire mesh. Tap water was poured gently into the funnel in which the mesh was placed until there was enough water in the funnel. The set- up was left for 48 hours and the water was poured separately into beakers and left overnight for the nematodes to settle. The supernatants were then poured through 90µm mesh on 36µ sieve. A spray water bottle was used to wash the nematodes into falcon tubes to a final volume of 10 mL.

Nematode populations were assessed in a counting dish using microscope and mean nematode density calculated per unit peel (outer corter) of each yam tuber. Each nematode water suspension was separately topped with tap water to 300 ml for standardization and each suspension was homogenized by blowing air through with a rubber straw.

24

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Figure 1. Nematode extraction from yam tuber peels using Maceration and Baerman funnel method.

3.6 Quantitative analysis of nematodes

Nematode suspension was concentrated to 10 mL in a glass vial. This was shaken gently and poured into an open 50 mm plastic counting dish. Nematode densities were assessed in a counting dish using microscope and mean nematode density calculated per unit peel (outer corter) of each yam tuber. This counting dish was already prepared by scratching grids (2 mm×2 mm) on the inner side of the base of a plastic petri dish with a needle to act as a guide when counting and examined under the compound light microscope (Exacta - Optech Biostar B5P) at 100x, magnification. A hand tally counter was used for counting nematodes and counting was repeated three times and the mean nematodes numbers in a sample suspension determined. The nematodes enumerated were expressed as number of nematodes in 200 cc of dry soil and 50g of yam tubers.

3.7 Handling and processing of nematodes

Nematode suspension was shaken and small batches of about 2 mL nematodes were sucked using a syringe and transferred to a counting dish. The selected nematodes for identification were mounted on a drop of water on a microscopic slide and placed on a hot plate at 60ºC (Hooper,

25

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

1990) until nematode suddenly straightened out. Extracted nematodes were examined directly under a compound light microscope.

To allow for further identification and long-term storage, nematodes were fixed. The Fixative,

FAA (4% Formalin with 1% glycerol) was heated to about 70°C and an excess (2-3 mL) was quickly added to the specimens to fix and kill the nematodes in one process (Seinhorst, 1966).

Nematodes were then cleared with glycerol (Hooper, 1990) before being mounted on a slide and viewed under a compound light microscope. Fixed specimens were then stored for further identification.

3.7.1 Nematode identification

Nematodes were identified to the genera level based on their morphological features as described by (Siddiqi 1989; Luc, et al.,1990) and the University of Nebraska Lincoln nematode identification website(http://nematode.unl.edu/konzlistbutt.htm). Identification was mainly based on adult nematodes.

3.8 Morphological characterization of Scutellonema spp.

3.8.1 Morphological observations and morphometries.

Ten males from each sample were used for the morphological characterization. Nematode specimen was kept in distilled water at room temperature in falcon tubes for 24 to 48 hours prior to characterization. Picking and manipulation of the nematodes were done using a fine eyelash mounted on a steel needle unto the centre of a clean glass slide. The nematodes were heat killed by adding a hot (≈70-75ºC) FAA fixative on the glass slide, covered with a cover slip (Hooper et al., 2005) and sealed using clear nail polish.

26

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

The prepared slides were marked on the cover slip for easier location while viewing under the compound light microscope. A permanent marker was used to label all slides with the sample number, specimen and the date of preparation.

The prepared slides were viewed under a binocular compound light microscope connected to a computer with Scope- Image-Professional Imaging software (Version 9.0) for processing and storing the images.

The Scope- Image-Professional Imaging software was used to snap digital pictures from the slides of the nematode specimen at 100x, 200x and 400x magnification and measurements undertaken.

The measurements obtained included the total body length, greatest body width, stylet length, tail length and the hyaline tail length. De Man’s ratios a = (total body length /greatest body width) and c = (total body length /tail length) were calculated.

All measurements were recorded and for each locality, the data was summarized by calculating the averages, range and standard deviation. The morphological observations and measurements were compared with the species descriptions given in the literature of Chitwood (1949), Eisenback

(1985b), Hewlett and Tarjan (1983), Jepson (1983, 1987), Whitehead (1968) and Sing (2009)

3.9 Data Analysis

SPSS PASW of Statistics Windows Version 20 was used to analyse the questionnaires administered. Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (AHC) (Ward, 1963; Everitt et al., 2001), was also used in generating a dendrogram to reveal the various groups and sub-groups of classes

27

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

within female S. bradys populations in Microsoft Excel XLSTAT (Version 2017, Addinsoft, Inc.,

Brooklyn, NY, USA 3.7

28

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

CHAPTER FOUR

4.0 RESULTS

4.1 Farmers’ knowledge, perceptions, and experiences concerning occurrences and management of dry rot disease of yam tubers in Krachi Nchumuru District of the Volta Region of Ghana 4.1.1 Background of Yam (Diocorea rotundata) Farmers in the study area 4.1.1.1 Age and sex of Respondent Majority of yam farmers in the study area were males (98%)while the rest were females (2%)

(Table 2).

Table 2. Sex of the respondents

sex Frequency Percent

FEMALE 1 2.0

MALE 49 98.0

Total 50 100.0

Most of the farmers were within the age ranges 21-30 years (30%) and 41- 50 years. Those aged

31-40 years were 24 % while the rest (16%) were 50 years Figure 2.

29

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

35

30

25

20

15

percntages(%) 10

5

0 21-30 31-40 41-50 >50 Age distribution of respondents

Figure 2. Age distribution of yam farmers in the Krachi Nchumuru District

4.1.1.2 Educational Background of the Respondents

The survey revealed that majority (42%) of the yam farmers had been to either middle school or

Junior High School The rest had been to primary school (14%), Senior High School (10%) and tertiary institutions (10%), has no formal education (34%) (Figure 3).

45 40 35

30

25 % 20 15 10 5

0 Primary JHS/Middle Secondary Tertiary None Level of education

Figure 3, Educational level of yam farmers in Krachi Nchumuru District

30

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

4.1.2. Period in yam farming

Majority of the farmers (54 %) had been cultivating yam for more than 15 years. The rest had been in yam farming for 12 - 15 years (10%), 6 – 10 years (26%) and have been in yam farming between

1-5years (10%) (Figure 4).

30 27

25

20

15 13

percentage% 10 5 5 5

0 1-5 6-10 12-15 .>15 Lenght of farming Experience in years

Figure 4. Period in yam farming

4. 1.3 Source of seed yam used by farmers

In 2016 majority of farmers (40%) used their own seed yam. The rest obtained their planting materials from family members (12%), the market (18%) or other source including own farm

(30%) (Figure 5).

31

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

45 40 35 30 25 20 15

Percentage (%) Percentage 10 5 0 Own farm Family member Market Others Source of planting materials

Figure 5. Source of planting materials for yam farmers

4.1.4 Farmers farm size in the year 2016

Majority of the farmers (62%) were small scale farmers with farm holdings less than 1 acre. The rest has farm size between 1 and 2 acres (12%) or 3 to 4 acres (26%) (Figure 6).

32

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

70 60 50 40 30 20 Percentage (%) Percentage 10 0 < 1 1 - 2 3 - 4 Farm Size (Acreage)

Figure 6. Farmers farm size in 2016

4.1.5. Varieties of yam planted

The survey reveal that majority of yam farmers (98%) planted ‘Pona’ variety of white yam in addition to other varieties. Varieties planted among others are ‘Pona’, ‘Olondo’, ‘Asobayere’,

‘Kplinjo’, ‘Nyame nti’, ‘Nkunuku’ etc (Figure 7)

33

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

120

100

80

60

40 Percentage of farmers

20

0 pona Other varieties varieties of yam planted Figure 7 varieties of yam planted.

4.1.6 Land use intensity of yam farmers in the Krachi Nchumuru District

Most of the farmers (30%)) had farmed in their land for 1-3 years. Another 30% had cultivated on the same piece of land for more than 15 years. Yam farmers who had cultivated on the same piece of land for the period between 4-6 years were 24%. Those who had cultivated between 7- 10 years were 12%. The rest of (4%) had cultivated on the same piece of land for 11- 15 years (Figure

8).

34

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

35 30 25 20 15 10

Percentage Farmers of Percentage 5 0 1 - 3 4 - 6 7 - 10 11 - 15 > 15 Years of cultivation on same piece of land

Figure 8. Duration of continuous cultivation of yam on same piece of land by farmers

4.1.7. Crops used in intercrop with yam

Maize, yam, groundnut, cassava and vegetables such as okra, pepper and tomatoes were major crops cultivated alongside yam on the land at the percentages of 18, 24, 20 and 14 and respectively.

Soybean was also prominent among the intercrops. However, all the farmers were into mixed cropping of the above crops. (Table 3)

Table 3: Crops used in intercropping with yam

Responses Frequency Percent

Yam 9 18.0 Cassava 7 14.0 4 8.0 Maize 12 24.0 Soybean 2 4.0 Groundnut 8 16.0 Vegetables 8 16.0 Total 50 100

35

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

4.1.8 Land Rotation

Majority of the farmers (54%) had rotated their land for 1-2 years, while the rest 3-5 years 38% and more than 5 years 8% (Figure 9).

60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1-2 3-5 >5 Percentage Percentage of farmers Years Figure 9 Duration of bush fallowing by yam farmers in the Krachi Nchumuru District

4.1.9. Land Fallowing

Majority of the farmer (66%) had fallowed their land while 34 % were into continuous cropping of yam without fallowing but rotating with other crops such as groundnut and maize (Table 4).

Table 4. Period of land fallow practiced by yam farmers Response Frequency Percent Rotation 33 66.0 No 17 34.0 rotation Total 50 100.0

36

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

4.1.10 Farmers knowledge, perception and experiences concerning prevalence of dry rot disease of yam of farm

All of the farmers (100%) had experienced diseased conditions in their yam farms. However, majority (62%) were not aware that nematodes were the cause of the disease, although all the farmers were familiar with the diseases in yam, 38% knew that the disease is caused by nematodes

(Figure 10).

70

60 50 40 30 20 Percentage Percentage of farmers 10 0 Aware Not aware farmers responses on nematodes parasitism

Figure 10. Knowledge about causal agent of dry rot disease of yam

4.1.11 Varieties susceptible to nematodes infestation

Majority of the farmers (84%) were of the view that the ‘Pona’ variety is more susceptible to nematode infestation than the other varieties in the study area (Fig 11).

37

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

90 80 70 60 50 40

Percentages 30 20 10 0 Pona other varieties varieties of planting material

Figure 11. Varieties of white yam mostly cultivated by farmers in the Krachi Nchumuru District

4.1.12 Farmers Knowledge on nematode parasitism on yam plant

Majority (62 %) of the farmers reported their yams were affected by reduced rooting but the (38%) did not observed these symptoms on their farm.

Most of the farmers rotting and discoloration of vegetative organs, (74 %) while the rest (26%) did not notice any symptoms while (26%).

A greater proportion (76%) of the farmers observed dwarfing, stunting and resetting symptoms.

Other noticed dwarfing only while the rest observed stunting and resetting on crops (74%), no dwarfing (24%) or stunting and resetting (26%). Most of the respondents (52%) observed necrotic lesions on the roots while the rest (48%) did not (Table 5).

38

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Table 5. Farmer’s knowledge on symptoms of nematode parasitism of yam plants in Krachi Nchumuru District Symptoms Frequency Percentage responses Necrotic streaks or lesion on 26 52 roots reduced rooting system 31 61

Internal discoloration of vegetative organs 37 74

Dwarfing 38 76

39 78 Stunting and resetting

4.1.13 Type of soils associated with nematodes parasitisim

Farmers in the study area indicated that they had nematode infestation in all types of soils. Lowland sandy soils (38%) well drained sandy soils (10%), sandy loam (16%), sandy clay loam soil (18%), loamy soil (4%) clay soil (18%) (Figure11).

40

35

30

25

20

15

10 Percentage of famers 5

0 Lowland well drained sandy clay Sandy clay loamy soil clayey soil sandy soil sandy soil soil Type of soil

Figure 11. Type of Soil associated with nematode parasitism of yam tubers

39

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

4.1.14

All farmers in the study area stored yams tubers in the farm or at home. A greater proportion of farmers (82%) stored their yam tubers in barns either in the farm or at home. Others stored theirs under trees (16%) in the farm or in the house (2%).

Majority of the farmers (98%) encountered pests and diseases during storage in their yam tubers and setts infected with nematode (Figure 12).

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

percentage of of respondentspercentage 20

10

0 Under a tree in a farm Yam barn at home or farm In a farm stead Yam storage methods

Figure 12. Method of storage of yam tubers after harvest

4.1.15. Farmers knowledge on symptoms of nematode parasitism of yam tubers in storage in the Krachi Nchumuru District of the Volta Region

Majority (88%) of the respondents observed external cracks on the tubers while the rest (12%) did not. Also most of the them (82%) noticed weight loss in tubers during storage while the rest 18% did not.

40

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Majority of the respondents (84%) had observed yellow lesion below the outer skin of the tuber while 16% did not. Majority of the farmers (84%) indicated that they observe rotting of the outer

1-2cm layer of the tuber, while the rest (16%). Most of the farmers observed flaking of external coverings with dark brown patches (80%) while the rest (20%) did not.

A greater proportion of the farmers (88%) experienced decay of yam tubers during storage while the rest (12%) did not (Table 6).

Table 6. Farmer’s knowledge on symptoms of nematode parasitism in stored yam tubers Symptoms Frequency Percentage External cracks on skin and tubers 44 88

Significant weight loses in 41 82 tubers 42 84 Light yellow lesion below the outer skin

Rotting of outer 1-2cm layer 42 84 of yam tuber flaking off of external 40 80 coverings expressing patches of dark brown colorations

General decay 44 88

4.1.17 Farmers knowledge, perception and experiences concerning the spread of nematodes infestation of yam tuber in the field and storage

All farmers in the study area indicated that the use of infected tubers as a planting material is not advisable as the setts will not sprout. A few of them reported that the use of infected tubers can spread nematodes. They perceived various methods by which the spread of nematodes could be

41

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

controlled. Among the farmers (10%) were of the view that nematodes could be managed through crop rotation. Another (10%) believed they could be managed through land rotation while others

(20%) believed that it could be managed through the destruction of infected yam setts. Some (10%) believe that nematodes could be controlled with the use of nematicides, while (50%) thought otherwise (Table 7).

Table 7. Measures perceived by farmers to be effective for control of yam nematode on tubers Control measures Frequency Percentage land rotation 5 10 Crop rotation 5 10 Nematicides 5 10 Destruction of infected tubers 10 20 Use of organic fertilizers 0 0 Others 0 0 No control 25 50

4.1.18 Economic impact of nematodes associated with stored yam tubers

Minority of the farmers (6%) cultivated yam only for their own consumption 22% cultivated yam only for income in order to purchase assets such as building and vehicle. The others (72%) cultivated yam for both food security and income generation (Figure 13).

42

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

80

70

60

50

40

30

20 Percentage Percentage of respondents 10

0 Food Security Income Generation Both food and Income

Reasons for cultivating yam Figure 13. Reason for cultivating yam by farmers

4.1.19. Postharvest losses of harvested yam due to nematodes

In 2013, losses up to (50%) was observed in yam during storage. Some farmers (24%) incurred tubers losses less than (10%) of the total harvest. Another (20%)of the farmers incured losses between 10-19%. About half of the respondents (50%) incurred losses between 30 and 50% while

(6%) of the farmers had over 50% tuber losses.

The trend was almost the same in 2014, 2015 and 2016. Majority of the farmers (80%) experience less than (20%) tuber loss while the rest experienced more than (50%) loss. Farmers who incurred tuber losses greater than (50%) were always less than (10%) of all respondents (Figure14).

43

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

40 35 2013 2014 2015 2016 30 25 20 15

Percentage Percentage losses 10 5 0 <10 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 >50 Years

Figure 14. Losses of yam tubers incurred by farmers from dry rot from 2013 to 2016.

On the influence of the nematode on socio economic impact on the farmers in the Krachi

Nchumuru District, only 10% of the respondents said they can pay their children school fees easily while 90% said they could not pay children school fees.

The survey revealed that 88% of yam farmers could not pay loans contracted for yam farming due to dry rot disease of tubers while 10% could pay.

Twelve percent of the respondents could not purchase assets such as tractors with implements and building houses. On payment of medical bills 82% of the respondents could not pay when they are indisposed while only 18% could pay medical bills as well as that of their spouses and children.

4.1.20

Majority of respondents (98%) have good relationship with Agricultural Extension Agents (AEA), and contact him for advice while (2%) have no relationships with the AEAs because one farmers claims he knows how to cultivate yam better than the AEAs (Table 8).

44

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Table 8. Influence of dry rot of yam tubers on socio economic activities of farmers in Krachi

Nchumuru

Money to Money to Money to Money to Relationship Relationship pay loans buy assets pay pay children with spouse with medical school fees and extension neighbors officer

Easy /cordial 10% 12% 12% 10% 78% 98%

Difficult/not cordial 90% 88% 88% 90% 22% 2%

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

4.2 Genera of plant parasitic nematodes associated with soils in yam rhizosphere soil and stored yam tubers

4.2.1. Nematodes genera associated with soil in yam rhizosphere

Twelve (12) general belonging to 7 families of the Orders Rhabdida and Dorylaimida were identified and isolated from rhizosphere soil (Table 8). The twelve (12) genera found in the soil sample were, Tylenchus spp. Pratylenchus spp. (lesion nematode), Helicotylenchus spp. (spiral nematode), Rotylenchulus spp. (Reniform nematode), Scutellonema spp. (Yam nematode),

Meloidogyne spp. (Root knot nematode), Tylenchulums spp., Ditylenchus spp., Longidurus spp.,

Heterodera spp., Rotylenchus spp. and Aphelenchoides spp.

45

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

The family Hoplolaimidae had the highest genera of four out of the twelve Tylenchulidae had three genera and the rest of the families (Aphelenchoididae, Pratylenchidae, Longidoridae,

Anguinidae and Tricodoridae) had one genus each. All the nematodes genera were present in all the communities surveyed (Table 9).

Table 9. Plant parasitic nematodes extracted from soil in yam rhizosphere soil. Order Sub Order Family Genus Rhabditida Pratylenchidae Pratylenchus Hoplolaimidae Helicotylenchus Heterodera Rotylenchulus Scutellonema Aphelenchoididae Aphelenchoides Meloidogynidae Meloidogyne Tylenchulidae Tylenchulus Tylenchus Paratylenchus Dorylaimida Dorylaimia Longidoridae Longidurus Anguinidae Ditylenchus

4.2.2 Nematode genera associated with stored yam.

Nine (9) genera of nematodes were found in the yam peels of stored yam tubers. These are

Scutellonema spp., Melodogyne spp., Paratylenchulus spp., Heterodera spp., Bursaphelenchulus spp. and Tylenchulums spp. The identification was based on the following: Lip region, position of the vulva, Stylet length, Tail length etc.

4.3 Morphological Description of some common nematode genera identified during the survey

46

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

4.3.1 Rotylenchulus spp.

Juveniles are short (0.35-0.45µm) the head region is rounded and striated, stylet is sclerotized and short approximately (13 -15 µm) and stylet knob is rounded and anteriorly flattened. The esophagus overlaps the intestine ventrally and the tail is rounded. The cephalic framework of the males is weakly developed and the stylets are short (12-15 µm) the meta corpus is poorly developed but conspicuous.

The female is sedentary and eggs are laid in gelatinous matrix, which often covers the female. The female’s posterior portion can be embedded into a root tissues while other parts remains external.

4.3.2 Melodoigyne spp.

Melodoigyne is usually long (1-2 mm) and cylindrically shaped. It has short stylet usually (18-

20µm). The esophageal region overlaps the intestine ventrally. The tail of male is short and rounded, there is no bursa. In the females the vulva region and anus are terminal. It loses its tail and becomes obese, sedentary and feeds endo-parasitically.

4.3.3 Pratylenchus spp.

It has a slender body and width which increases from the pharyngeal bulb towards the vulva. The anterior region is broad and the head is blunt. It has a short stylet which is scleroinized with large and prominent metacarpus. The esophagus overlaps intestine ventrally. The tail tapers strongly

47

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

with narrow tip. Male tip is pointed and bursa edges faintly crenated (Figure 15

Figure 15. Pratylenchus spp. (Juvenile) 4.3.4. Tylenchulums spp.

Tylenchus have stronger stylets and tis differentiate it from Meloidogyne, it has more posterior excretory pore and the absence of pharyngeal overlap. It has slender body length and width and the tail is elongated and attenuated.

4.3.5 Scutellonema spp.

Scutellonema identification was done based on morphological features of the male and female

4.3.5.1. Female

It has a straight to acruate body when relaxed; The annulus is about 1.6 µm near the middle. The lateral fields are about one fifth of the body-width, lip region is knob-like which offset by

48

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

constriction. The labial disc is 6 to 8 annuls and lack longitudinal striations. The spear is well developed and accompanied by large oval to rounded basal knobs. Esophageal glands elongate overlapping intestine dorsally and dorso-ventrally. Vulva of Scutellonema is a transverse slit with cuticular thickening which is conspicuous towards the ends. Tail is obtuseand rounded to striated terminus.

Figure 16. Female Scutellonema bradys 4.3.5.2 Males

Male scutellonema is similar to the female with large bursa and crenate enclosing the tail. The specules are slightly cephalated which is ventrally arcuate and distal flanges which are large. There is a prominent capitulum which is about 10µm long. Cuticle is non-protoplasmic with terminal portion of the tail.

4.3.6 Helicotylenchus spp.

When relaxed the body is spiral; lip region rounded and bearing five annules. It has long starlets with cupped knobs. Behind the stylet is the dorsal esophageal gland outlet Plate 6

49

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Figure 17. Helicotylenchus spp.

4.4.1 Frequency of occurrence of plant parasitic nematodes rhizosphere soil

The frequency of occurence of nematodes extracted from rhizosphere soil in the study area are

Scutellonema spp. (131), Meloidogyne spp, (70) Longidorus spp. (52), Tylenchulus spp. (52)

Helicotylenchus spp. (46), Ditylenchus spp. (42), Heterodera spp. (18), Pratylenchus spp. (10),

Paratylenchus spp. (10) Rotylenchus spp. (10) Bursphlenchoides spp. (3) and Appelenchoidesspp.

(2). The genera Scutellonema recocorded the highest number (131) while the genera

Appelenchoides spp also recorded the lowest. (Figure 14).

50

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

160

140

120

100

80

60

Frequency of occurence of Frequency 40

20

0

-20 ` Nematode genera Figure 18. Nematode population in the yam rhizosphere soil

Only Scutellonema spp. was present (100%) in all the 20 soil samples from all the communities.

The relative abundance was 31.5%. Meloidogyne spp. was not present in all communities but had

(75%) The relative abundance was 16.8%. Longidorus spp. was present in 17 farms with relative abundance of (12.5) Helicotylenchus spp. relative abundance of (11.1%), this nematode was present in 11 farms (55%), while Tylenchulus spp. was present in 11 farms (55%), however, it relative abundance was (12.5%). The rest of the nematodes were not in all the farms and their relative abundance value were less than (5%) each (Table 10).

51

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Table 10. Relative abundance of nematode in rhizosphere soil Nematode genera Frequency %Frequency Nematode Relative of rating* population/200 Abundance occurrence cc soil %** Scutellonema spp. 20 100 131 31.5 Meloidogyne spp. 15 75 70 16.8 Helicotylenchus spp. 11 55 46 11.1 Longidorus spp. 17 85 52 12.5 Ditylenchus spp. 2 10 3 0.7 Rotylenchus spp. 4 20 10 2.4 Bursaphelenchuss 3 15 3 0.7 spp. Paratylenchus spp. 6 30 10 2.4 Pratylenchus spp. 5 25 19 4.6 Apenlenchoides spp. 2 10 2 0.5 Heterodera spp. 9 45 18 4.0 Tylenchulums spp. 11 55 52 12.5 * n/N x 100 (n=frequency of individual nematode occurrence. N=sample size (20)

**In/TN (In individual genera in all samples, TN=Total Nematode population in all genera)

4.4.2 Mean densities of nematodes rhizosphere soil

The highest number of nematodes were obtained from rhizosphere soil from Chinderi while the lowest number of nematodes are from soil in Banda

In all the soil samples Scutellonema spp. was found to be high in number. Scutellonema spp. was present in all the soils sampled however, other genera were not found in all the soils (Table 11)

52

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Table 11. Mean densities of Nematodes in rhizosphere soil Comm Scutell Meloid Paratyl Longi Dityle Rotyle Tylenc Heter Apendc Helicotyl Tylenc Pratyle Total uni one ogy enc do nc nc hus od hoid ench hul ncul m ty ma ne hus ru hu hus spp, er es us um us ea spp spp spp. s s spp a spp. spp s spp n . sp sp . sp p. p. p. Borae 4 4 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 5 4 1 22 Malla 3 0 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 16 Chinde 8 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 14 ri Zongo 6 5 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 22

Banda 8 2 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 15 Kaliak 8 5 1 2 2 0 0 2 1 0 6 0 27 o Kokor 6 0 5 6 9 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 31 se Bejam 10 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 1 6 2 0 26 se Grube 4 2 0 3 1 3 0 1 1 2 4 1 22 Boafri 8 5 0 4 0 0 1 1 0 2 8 0 29 Total 65 23 12 26 21 5 3 10 7 22 26 4 224

53

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

4.4.3. Densities of plant parasitic nematodes associated with stored yam A higher number of Scutellonema, spp. Meloidogyne spp. and Pratylenchus spp. were extracted from yam tuber peels of stored yam tubers. Nematode genera that were associated with peels of stored yam tuber can be seen (Figure 15).

34086

2471 2052 19 70 40 140 16 60 Nematode Populations Nematode

Nematode Genera

Figure 19. Population of nematodes extracted from peels of yam tuber

The genera Scutellonema spp. Meloidogynae spp. and Pratylenchus spp. were found in all the yam tubers collected in storage. Their frequency rating was (100%) each. The other six genera were not found in all the soils collected. Scutellonema bradys. had the highest relative abundance of 87.4% followed by Meloidogyne spp. with relative abundance of 6.3% (Table 12).

54

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Table 12. Occurrence and relative abundance of plant parasitic nematodes associated with stored yam tubers Nematode genera Frequency % frequency Nematode Relative of rating* population Abundance occurrence /50g peels

Scutellonema spp. 20 100 34,086 87.4

Meloidogyne spp. 20 100 2,471 6.3 Paratylenchus spp. 20 100 2,053 5.3 Heterodera spp. 2 10 70 0.2 Bursaphelenchus 1 5 40 0.1 spp. Helicotylenchus 1 5 40 0.1 spp. Pratylenchus spp. 4 20 140 0.4 Radopholus spp. 2 10 16 0.1 Tylenculums spp. 1 5 60 0.1

* n/N x 100 (n=frequency of individual nematode occurrence. N=sample size (20) **In/TN (In individual genera in all samples, TN=Total Nematode population in all genera)

The highest and least nematodes populations were from Kaliako (8,067) and Bejamse (69) respectively. The top three nematode species were Scutellonema spp. (15,619), Meloidogyne spp.

(1055), and Pratylenchus spp. (580). The nematode with the least population was Radophulus spp.

(16) (Table 13).

55

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Table 13. Mean densities of nematodes from yam tubers in storage in Krachi Nchumuru District

Community Scutellonema Meloidogyne Pratylenchus Radopholus Heterodera Bursaphelenchus Helicotylenchus Tylenchulums Pratylenculus spp. spp. spp. spp. spp. spp. spp. spp. spp.

Borae 390 10 5 10 6 0 20 0 0

Malla 1620 14 25 0 0 60 0 0 0

Chinderi 2633 450 230 0 13 0 100 0 0

Zongo 109 96 39 0 0 30 0 0 0 Michire

Banda 430 105 46 6 0 0 40 0 0

Kaliako 7767 96 44 0 0 0 0 60 100

Kokorse 150 63 80 0 0 0 20 0 0

Bejamse 20 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grube 500 200 52 0 0 0 0 0 20

Boafri 2000 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 20

Total 15619 1054 580 16 19 90 180 60 140

56

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

4.5. Morphometric characteristics of female Scutellonema bradys

The mean total body length of the S. bradys populations ranged from 747 µm to 861 µm (Table

13). The ratio ‘a’ ranged from 17.4 to 30.0 with the mean of 25.4. The range of ratio ‘c’ was 82.4

µm -130.6 with a mean of 100.6. The ratio ‘c'’ ranged from 0.3 to 0.5. The stylet length ranged between 18 µm and 28.1 µm, with the nematode populations from Banda having the highest mean stylet length (23.9 µm).

Tail length of the S. bradys ranged between them was 5.7 µm and 9.3 µm. The average lip region diameter of S. bradys was 9.8µm and range was between 7.3 µm and 11.9. The diameter at the head region was between 11.3 µm and 27.8µm.

The tail diameter ranged between 15.4 and 17.6 µm in all the samples with a mean of 15.6 µm.

The highest value of 17.6 µm was obtained from Banda and the lowest value 14.3 µm was also obtained from Chinderi. The stylet knob height was 4.4 µm at Zongo Macheri and lowest 3.8µm with a mean of 4.1 µm. The lowest scutellum height of 3.8 was obtained from all the rest of the communities. The stylet knob width had a value which ranged between. 3.1 and 5.9µm (Figures

20 and 21, Table 14).

57

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Table 14. Morphometrics characteristics of Scutellonema bradys females

Location Chinderi Bemjamse Grubi Boafri Zongo Micheri Body length 794.0±40(624.6-965) 774.0±24.8(624.6- 861.9±96.4(624.6- 754.4±11.0(624.6- 752.4±13.0(624.6- 996.1) 932.3) 932.3) 886.54) A 25.2±14.9(10.3-24.3) 24.8±8.6(20.1-24.3) 25.8±8.6(28.0-28.5) 25.8±11.0(24.3-28.0) 25.7±13.0(24.3-28.0) C 106.4±0.0(82.4-122.1) 98.7±0.2(86.0- 100.0±0.1(100.7- 99.1±0.0(100.7- 98.8±0.0(100.7-110.3) 110.3) 130.6) 130.6) C' 0.5±0.1(0.3-0.5) 0.5±0.(0.4-0.5) 0.5±0.1(0.4-0.5) 0.5±0.7(0.4-0.5) 0.5±0.1(0.4-0.5) S 1.6±0.2(1.3-1.8) 1.4±4(1.4-1.5) 1.4±0.1(1.4-1.7) 1.4±0.1(1.4-1.7) 1.4±0.8(1.4-1.7) Stylet length 24.4±1.4(20.7-26.4) 22.7±0.3(19.1-25.4) 22.6±0.5(19.1-25.4) 22.6±0.5(19.1-25.4) 22.6±0.5(19.1-25.4) Diameter at mid body 32.0±1.9(25.7-77.2) 31.2±1.1(25.7-44.2) 29.2±0.9(25.7-33.2) 29.2±0.9(25.7-33.2) 29.2±0.9(25.7-33.2)

Tail length 7.6±0.0(3.6-9.7) 7.8±0.2(5.7-9.3) 7.5±0.1(5.7-9.3) 7.6± 0.0(5.7-9.3) 7.6±0.0(5.7-9.3)

Lip region diameter 9.9±0.3(7.3-11.9) 9.9±0.4(7.4-11.9) 9.8±0.4(7.4-11.8) 9.8± 0.4(7.4-11.8) 9.8±0.4(7.4-11.8) Diameter at head 15.3±1.6(11.3-19.6) 15.9±1.1(13.3-18.8) 16.2±0.7(11.5-17.8) 16.2±0.7(11.5-17.8) 16.2±0.7(11.5-17.8) region Diameter at tail region 14.3±1.8(13.2-17.6) 15.2±0.9(13.2-17.6) 15.3±0.8(13.3-17.6) 15.4±0.7(13.3-17.6) 15.3±0.8(13.3-17.6) Stylet knob height 3.8±0.1(3.3-4.5) 4.1±0.2(3.3-4.5) 3.8±0.1(3.3-4.5) 3.8±0.1(3.3-4.5) 4.4±0.4(3.3-4.5) Stylet knob width 4.5±0.4(3.1-5.9) 5.1±0.2(3.8-5.9) 4.9±0.0(3.8-5.8) 4.9±0.0(3.8-5.9) 4.8±0.1(3.8-5.9) Lip region height 4.5±0.2(3.0-6.0) 4.8±0.1(3.4-6.0) 4.6±0.1(3.4-6.0) 4.6±0.1(3.4-6.0) 5.5±0.8(3.4-6.0) Position of vulva to 366.8±11.1(304.35- 409.2±31.3(313.6- 362.3±15.6(317.6- 362.3±15.6(317.6- 362.3±15.6(317.6- interior 456.8) 498.9) 412.5) 412.5) 412.5) Scutellum height 6.2±0.2(3.3-9.6) 6.7±0.3(5.4-8.9) 64±0.1(5.4-8.9) 6.4±0.1(5.4-8.9) 5.5±0.9(5.4-8.9) Scutellum width 4.8±1.4(3.3-6.5) 3.6±0.3(2.0-4.9) 3.3±0.1(2.0-4.9) 3.3±0.1(2.0-4.9) 3.3±0.1(2.0-4.9)

58

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Measurement(µm) and ratios are in the form of mean ± standard deviation (range)a=body length/diameter at mid body, c=body length/tail length, c'= tail length/diameter at tail region, s= stylet length /diameter at head region.

Table 14. cont. Morphometrics characteristics of Scutellonema bradys females

Location Borae Kaliako Korkorse Banda Malla Body length 754.4±11.0(624.6- 767.2±1.8(624.6- 747.3±18.1(624.6- 756.5±6.8(624.6- 786.5± 21.1(624.6- A 886.5) 932.3) 952.6) 932.3) 955.8) 25.8±11.0(24.3-28.0) 26.3±1.8(24.3-30.0) 24.8±18.1(12.1-24.3) 23.0±6.8(17.1-24.3) 27.0±21.1(23.7-28.0) C 99.1±0.0(99.7-110.3) 101.0±0.0(106.5- 99.8±0.1(100.7- 100.7±0.1(102.9- 101.5±0.1(102.9- 110.3) 110.3) 110.3) 100.3) c' 0.5±0.1(0.4-0.5) 0.5±0.1(0.4-0.5) 0.5±0.1(0.4-0.5) 0.3±0.2(0.3-0.4) 0.5±0.1(0.4-0.5) S 1.5±0.(1.4-1.6.) 1.4±0.0(1.3-1.7) 1.4±0.1(1.5-1.7) 1.5±0.1(1.4-1.6) 1.4±0.0(1.5-1.6) Stylet length 22.6± 0.5(19.1-25.4) 22.9±0.1(19.1-25.4) 22.9±0.1(19.1-26.4) 23.9± 0.9(19.7-26.0) 23.1±0.1(18.1-28.1) Diameter at mid body 29.2±0.9(25.7-33.2) 29.1±1.0(25.7-33.2) 30.2±0.0(25.7-77.2) 32.9±2.8( 30.1-35.7 ) 29.2±1.0(26.2-33.2)

Tail length 7.6±0.0(5.7-9.3) 7.6±0.0(5.7-9.3) 7.5± 0.1(5.7-9.3) 7.5±0.1(5.7-9.3) 7.8±0.1(5.7-9.3) Lip region diameter 9.8±0.4(7.4-11.8) 9.9± 0.3(7.4-11.8) 9.8± 0.4(7.4-11.8) 10±3.4(7.4-11.8) 9.8±0.4(7.4-11.8) Diameter at head 16.2±0.7(11.5-17.8) 16.4±0.6(11.5-17.6) 16.3±0.6(11.5-17.8) 24.1±7.1(11.5-27.8) 16.7± 0.2(11.5-17.8) region Diameter at tail region 15.4±0.7(13.2-17.6) 15.4±0.7(13.2-17.6) 15.5±0.6(13.2-17.6) 17±0.9(15.3-17.3) 15.7± 0.5(13.2-17.6) Stylet knob height 3.8±0.1(3.3-4.5) 3.9±0.0(3.3-4.5) 3.8± 0.1(3.3-4.5) 3.8±0.7(3.3-4.5) 3.8±0.1(3.3-4.5) Stylet knob width 4.9±0.0(3.8-5.9) 4.9±0.0(3.8-5.9) 4.8±0.1(3.8-5.9) 5.2±0.3(3.8-6.0) 5.1±0.2(3.8-8.0) Lip region height 4.6±0.1(3.4-6.0) 4.7±0.0(3.4-6.0) 4.6±0.1(3.4-6.0) 5.1±0.4(3.4-6.0) 4.7±0.0(3.4-6.0) Position of vulva to 362.3±15.6(304.5- 366.8±11.1(304.- 362.9±15.0(304.6- 461.0±83.1(304.6- 363.0±14.9(304.6- interior 412.5) 456.8) 412.5) 456.8) 412.5) Scutellum height 6.4±0.1(5.4-7.7) 6.5±0.1(5.4-7.7) 6.3±0.1(5.4-7.7) 6.4±0.1(5.4-7.7) 6.8±0.3(5.4-8.9)

59

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Scutellum width 2.3±0.1(2.3-4.2) 3.3±0.1(2.3-4.2) 3.2±0.2(2.3-4.2) 4.0±0.6(2.3-4.2) 3.2±0.2(2.3-4.2) Measurement(µm) and ratios are in the form of mean ± standard deviation (range)a=body length/diameter at mid body, c=body length/tail length, c'= tail length/diameter at tail region, s= stylet length /diameter at head region .

60

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

A

B

Figure 20. Micrograph showing morphometric features of S. bradys, (A)stylet length and diameter at head region diameter (B) tail length

61

D University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

C

D

Figure 21. Micrograph showing morphometric features of S. bradys, (C) Stylet (D) diameter at mid body.

62

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Correlation between morphometric characters for female S. bradys populations

There was a strong positive correlation between tail length and tail region diameter (r = 0.81) and also stylet knob height and vulva position (r= 0.68) (Table 16). There were moderate positive correlations were between lip region diameter and head region diameter (r= 0.46), lip region diameter and tail region diameter (r= 0.48) and also lip region height and scutellum length (r=

0.47). Most of the other variables were weakly correlated.

63

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Variables body stylet diameter tail lip head tail stylet stylet lip vulva scutellum scutellum length length at mid length region region region knob knob region position height lenth region diameter diameter diameter height width height body length 1 stylet length 0.059 1 diameter at mid -0.096 -0.102 1 region tail length 0.278 -0.336 0.291 1 lip region diameter -0.031 0.075 0.179 0.230 1 head region -0.002 0.019 0.192 0.112 0.455 1 diameter tail region -0.032 -0.101 0.123 0.155 0.482 0.812 1 diameter stylet knob height 0.206 0.310 0.099 -0.145 0.192 0.190 0.275 1 stylet knob width 0.140 0.109 -0.156 -0.241 -0.010 0.111 0.120 0.266 1 lip region height 0.031 -0.041 0.113 0.203 0.238 0.242 0.174 0.113 - 1 0.227 vulva position 0.358 0.125 0.192 0.136 0.227 0.290 0.304 0.681 0.377 0.223 1

64

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

scutellum height 0.088 -0.050 0.291 0.195 0.075 0.118 -0.181 -0.039 - 0.238 0.081 1 0.017 scutellum length 0.134 0.088 0.218 0.142 0.291 0.141 0.122 0.376 0.160 0.472 0.502 0.278 1

Table 15. Correlation between matrix (Pearson) (n) of S. bradys female morphometric variables

65

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (AHC)

Agglomerative hierarchical clustering (AHC) revealed five groups at a dissimilarity of 90%.

However, below 50% sub-groups were formed as nematodes from different sites clustered together, irrespective of their source. Nematodes from Groups one and two consisted only of nematodes from Banda community, however, the other groups were made of nematodes from varying communities (Figure 22).

66

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Dendrogram

400

350

300

250

200 Dissimilarity

150

100

50

0 BJ4 BJ3 BJ6 BJ1 BJ2 BJ9 BJ7 BJ8 BJ5 BA8 BA7 BA4 BA9 BA5 BA6 BA2 BA1 BA3 KA4 KA3 KA6 KA1 KA2 KA9 KA7 KA8 KA5 ZN4 ZN3 ZN6 ZN1 ZN2 ZN9 ZN7 ZN8 ZN5 MA10 BO10 BF10 KO10 GR10 MA4 MA3 MA6 MA1 MA2 MA9 MA7 MA8 MA5 BA10 CH10 BO4 BF4 BO3 BF3 BO6 BF6 BF1 BO1 BO2 BF2 KA10 BO9 BF9 BO7 BF7 BO8 BF8 BO5 BF5 KO4 KO3 KO6 KO1 KO2 KO9 KO7 KO8 KO5 ZN10 GR4 GR3 GR6 GR1 GR2 GR9 GR8 GR7 GR5 BJ10 CH4 CH3 CH6 CH2 CH9 CH7 CH8 CH1 CH5

Gp1 Gp2 Gp3 Gp4 Gp5 Figure 22. Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (AHC) of nematodes from ten communities in Krachi Nchumuru District. MA=Malla, BO=Borae, CH=Chinderi, ZN =Zongo Macheri, BA =Banda, KO=Kokorse, BJ=Bejamse, KA=Kaliako, BF=Boafri and GR=Grubi; 0-10= Number of Scutellonema bradys (female) morphometrically characterised from each community. Color codings: Light blue-Group 1 (Gp1), Red-Group 2 (Gp2), Green-Group 3(Gp3), Purple-Group 4, and Deep Blue-Group 5(GP5).

67

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

CHAPTER FIVE

5.0 DISCUSSION

Majority of farmers were males while females were few. This might be due to the physical nature of yam cultivation, women were perceived to be weak, and therefore did not engage in strenuous activities. Most of the farmers also had little or no formal education. In Ghana, most people with higher education seek for jobs in cities and thus, leave the farming in the hands of those with little or no formal education. In another study, farming in Sierra Leone was left in the hands of individuals with little or no formal education, while the highly educated sought for jobs in the cities (Sesay et al., 2013).

The lack of knowledge about yam nematodes may have been a contributory factor to the high prevalence of dry rot disease in yam tubers. The dry rot disease may also have resulted from improper farming practices, such as the non-removal of stubbles and volunteer crops during the off-season which may serve as alternative hosts for nematodes. Nematodes are capable of surviving on alternative host plants especially those with underground food storage (Luc et al.,

2005; Sikora and Fernandez, 2005). Some farmers, however, were into continuous cultivation of yam without land or crop rotation, which could have resulted in the persistence of nematodes in most farmers’ fields. Many of the farmers had no knowledge about nematodes, therefore, could have attributed nematode infection to moisture stress and nutrient deficiency. They may have also encouraged their spread through soil adhering to farm tools and equipment and footwear (Hunt et al., 2005).

Yam is vegetative propagated by seed yam and setts, and farmers usually produce their own planting materials, buy from markets and also from relatives and these planting materials could be

68

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

a major source of inoculum for the yam nematodes (Kwoseh et al., 2005). The movement of the yam setts from one location to other contributes to the spread of the nematodes in farmers’ fields.

Farmers grow different early maturing crops alongside yam (a late maturing crop) either as food security crop or for income generation. This practice also minimizes the risks associated with pest and disease, price variability, and ensure food availability all year round (Coursey and Booth,

1977).

High losses incurred by the farmers might have been due to the parasitic nature of S. brays which reduced both tuber yield and quality with estimated losses of 75% when infected yam tubers are stored for long periods (Jakata and Bridge 1990). Yam storage losses to nematodes up to 80% have also been recorded (Nwauzor, 1982; Hahn et al., 1989). Wachira et al. (2009), observed that the addition of organic manure into the soil decreases nematode populations, however none of the farmers applied organic manure in their yam farms.

Farmers in the Krachi Nchumuru District produce yam for consumption, income generation, and for purchase of assets. Therefore, failure to meet their production targets affect their ability to get enough food for the family throughout the year. Also their ability to pay medical bills, paying of children’s school fees, service old loans as well as their social responsibilities are affected. This could be overcome through farmer education on nematode parasitism and gearing research towards generating and maintaining sustainable healthy panting materials.

Twelve genera belonging to seven nematode families of order Rhabdida and Dorylaimida were identified in yam rhizosphere soils and nine genera in stored yam tubers. These were

Scutellonema spp., Meloidogyne spp. Longidorus spp., Tylenchulus spp., Helicotylenchus spp.,

Ditylenchus spp., Heterodera spp., Pratylenchus spp., Rotylenchus spp., Appenlenchoides spp.,

69

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

and Bursaphelenchoides spp., Scutellonema spp. The predominant nematodes in both soil and yam tuber peels were Scutellonema spp., Meloidogyne spp., and Pratylenchus spp. There

Adesiyan and Odihirin (1977) also isolated and identified Scutellonema spp., Pratylenchus spp.,

Meloidogyne spp., Helicotylenchus spp., Criconemoides spp and Xiphinemas pp. as the most important nematode species on yam in Mid-West State of Nigeria. In a similar study conducted in Ghana, the relative abundances of the top three nematodes from yam peels were Pratylenchus spp. (32.4%), Scutellonema bradys (18.2%), and Meloidogyne spp. (21.3%) (Jamani, 2015).

However, in our study, the top three nematodes from the yam peels were Scutellonema bradys

(87.4%), Meloidogyne spp. (6.3%), and Pratylenchus spp. (5.3%).

Nematodes infestation has also been reported to be a serious constraint in yam production in various parts of the world (Kwoseh, et al., 2005; Baimey, 2006; Kumar and Singh, 2010). The rise in number of Scutellonema bradys. in stored yam tuber compare to the number soil in yam rhizospere indicate that S. bradys can reproduce on stored yam tubers (Kwoseh et al.,2005).

A comparison of the morphometric measurements in our study with others described in literature show slight differences. In the current study, body lengths ranged from 624.6 µm- 996.1 µm, but, in another study, body lengths ranged from 624.6 µm -858.5 µm (Jamani, 2015).

In this study although AHC showed groups and sub-groups, nematodes from different communities clustered in each of these groups, because of overlaps in morphometrics among the populations. In another study, S. brachyurus populations from United States (type A), South Africa

(type B), and Taiwan (Type B) distinctly clustered from each other through factor analysis (Van

Den Berg et al., 2013). The lack of distinct grouping for female S. bradys population in the current study could be due to absence of similarities among the morphometrics within the populations

70

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

studied. Significant morphological variation exists within female S. bradys populations, because of sub-group formations.

71

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

CHAPTER 6

6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions

The results obtained from the study indicates that yam (Dioscorea spp.) farmers in the

Krachi Nchumru District were of aware of the presence of nematodes parasitism, physical

damage they caused to their yams from the fields and in storage. However; they were

ignorant about the organism that causes the disease and the spread of it within and among

farms. Most farmers in the district believed that nematode parasitism cannot be controlled,

some farmers however used cultural methods such as crop rotation and land rotation to

manage them. Nematode parasitism has negatively impact on the farmers which affect their

livelihood.

 The major genera of nematodes extracted and identified from the soils and yam in storage

were; Scutellonema bradys, Meloidogyne spp., and Paratylenchus spp.

 Agglomerative hierarchical clustering (AHC) revealed five groups at a dissimilarity of

90%. There were formations of sub-groups at dissimilarity values below 50%.

72

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

6.2 Recommendations

 Education of yam farmers in the Krachi Nchumuru District should be intensified. This can

change the farmers’ perception on mode of spread of nematodes which will ensure effective

management.

 Molecular characterization of the yam nematode should be explored to validate the

presence of variation among S. bradys populations

73

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

REFERENCES

Addoh, P. G. (1971). The distribution and economic importance of plant parasitic nematodes in

Ghana. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science 4: 21–32.

Agrios, G. N. (2005). Plant diseases caused by nematodes. In: Plant Pathology Agrios G. N. (Ed)

826-874 p Elsevier Academic Press Burlington MA 01803 San Diego California, USA

Adagbite, A. A. and Agbage, G. O. (2007). Efficacy of Furadan (Carbofuran) in Control of Root- knot Nematode (Meloidogyne incognita Race 2) in Hybrid Yam Varieties in South- western

Nigeria. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3 (2): 256-262,

Adesiyan, S. O. and Odihirin, R. A. (1977). Plant parasitic nematodes associated with yam tubers in Mid-West State, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Plant Protection 3: 178–179.

Adesiyan, S. O. and Odihirin, R. A. (1975). Root knot nematodes as pests of yams (Dioscorea spp.) in southern Nigeria. Nematologica 24: 132–134.

Adesiyan, S. O. and Adeniji, M. O. (1976). Studies on some aspects of yam nematode

(Scutellonema bradys). Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science. 9:131-136.

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 97

Andrássy, I. (1958). Hoplolaimus tylenchiformis Daday, (1905) (syn. H. coronatus Cobb, 1923) und die Gattungen der Unterfamilie Hoplolaiminae Filip’ev, 1936. Nematologica 3 (2): 155 – 167.

Adesiyan, S. O. (1976). Host range studies of the yam nematode, S. bradys. Nematropica 6 (2):

60-63.

Adegbite, A. A., Saka, J. O., Agbaje, G. O., Owolade, O. F., Olaifa, G. O., Lawal A. and Ojo

S. T. (2006). Survey of plant parasitic nematodes associated with yams in Edo, Ekiti and Oyo

States of Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural. Resources 1 (4): 125–130.

74

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Abd El-Gawad, M. A. M., & Ahmed, N. S. (2007). Cheese yield as affected by some parameters review. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum: Technologia Alimentaria, 10(2), 131-153.

Bridge, J. Coyne, D. and Kwoseh, C. K., (2005). Nematode parasites of tropical root and tuber crops. In: Luc, M., Sikora, R. and Bridge, J. (Eds.), Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and

Tropical Agriculture. Revised 2nd ed., CAB International, UK. 221–258pp.

Bridge, J. (1972). Nematode problems with yams (Dioscorea spp.) in Nigeria. PANS. 1: 89–91.

Bridge, J. and Page, S. (1984). Plant nematode pests of crops in Papua New Guinea. Journal of

Plant Protection in the Tropics 1: 99-109.

Bridge, J. (1982). Nematodes of yams. In: Yam. Igname, (eds.) Miege J. and Lyonga, S.N.

Clarendon Press, Oxford. 253 – 264 p.

Bridge, J. (1996). Nematode management in sustainable and subsistence agriculture. Plant

Parasitic Nematodes in Temperate Agriculture. CAB International Wallingford UK p 203-209.

Baimey, H., Coyne, D. and N. Labuschagne. (2009). Pathogenicity of Scutellonema bradys populations from different geographical areas in Benin on yam (Dioscorea spp.). Crop Protection

28:715-721.

Baimey, H., Coyne, D. and Labuschagne, N. (2006). Effect of fertilizer application on yam nematode (Scutellonema bradys) multiplication and consequent damage to yam (Dioscorea spp.) under field and storage conditions in Benin. International Journal of Pest Management 52: 63-

70.

Brandon, K. (2001). Moving beyond integrated conservation and development projects (ICDPs) to achieve biodiversity conservation in: Tradeoffs or synergies? Agricultural intensification,

Economic development and the Environment. D.R. Lee and C.B. Barrett editions. CABI

Publishing, Wallingford, UK. 197 -221 p.

75

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Bridge, J. Coyne, D. and Kwoseh, C. K., (2005). Nematode parasites of tropical root and tuber crops. In: Luc, M., Sikora, R. and Bridge, J. (Eds.), Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and

Tropical Agriculture. Revised 2nd ed., CAB International, UK. 221–258pp.

Coomans, A. (2000). Nematode systematics: past, present and future. Nematology 2: 3-7 p.

Coursey, D. G. (1975). Yams. An Account on the nature, origins, cultivation and utilization of the useful members of Dioscoreaceae. Tropical Agricultural series. Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd.

London, UK. 230 pp.

Cornelius, E. W. (1998). Causes and control of tuber rots of white yam: causes, varietal susceptibility and control. Journal of the Ghana science association 1(3):45-52.

Cornelius, E. W., Offei, S. K., and Oduro, K. A. (2011). The impact of tuber rots on the postharvest exploitation of white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) in Ghana. Ghana journal of horticulture 2:106-112.

Pest control in tropical root crops /Centre for Overseas Pest Research (1978). Centre for

Overseas Pest Research (Great Britain)

Coursey, D. G. and Booth, R. H. (1977). Post-harvest problems of non-grain staples. Acta

Horticulture. 53: 23-33.

Coursey, D. G. (1965). The role of yams in West Africa. Food economies. World Crops 17: 74-

82.

Chitwood, D.J. and Maryland, B. (2003). Nematicides United States Department ofAgriculture.H.M. (2004) Effect of silicon on real time nitrogen management in a rice ecosystem.

African Journal of Agriculture Research, 9: 831-840.

Coursey, D. G., (1967). Yams. Longmans, London. 28 – 67 pp.

76

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Coyne, D. L., Tchabi, A., Baimey, H., Labuschagne, N. and Rotifa, I. (2006). Distribution and prevalence of nematodes (Scutellonema bradys and Meloidogyne spp.) on marketed yam

(Dioscorea spp.) in West Africa. Field Crops Research 96: 142-150.

Coyne, D. L., Akpheokhai, L. I. and Adeniran, A. F. (2011). The yam nematode (Scutellonema bradys), a potential threat to potato (Solanum tuberosum) production in West Africa. Plant

Pathology 60: 992-997

Coyne, D. L., Williamson, V. M. and Banna, A. B. (2006). Analysis of the pathogenic, morphological and genetic variability of Scutellonema bradys on yam in West Africa. African

Plant Protection 12: 1- 8.

Coyne, D. L., Talwana, H. A. L. and Maslen, N. R. (2003). Plant-parasitic nematodes associated with root and tuber crops in Uganda. African Plant Protection 9: 87-98.

Chitwood, D. J., & Krusberg, L. R. (1951). Pectolytic Enzymes in Three Populations of Ditylenchus dipsaci. Journal of Nematology, 9(3), 187–192. Root crop. The Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA). The McMillan Press

Degras, L. M. (1993). The yam: A tropical, London. 408 pp.

Diby. L. N., Carsky, R., Assa A., Girardin, O. and Frossard, E. (2004). Understanding soil factors limiting the potential yield of yam (Dioscorea spp.). In: Fisher T., Turner, N., Angus, J.,

McIntrye. L., Robertson, M., Borrell, A., Lloyd, D. (eds). New directions for a more diverse planet.

Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress. Brisbane, Australia, 26 September –

1 October 2004.

Dropkin, V. H. (1980). Introduction to plant nematology. Wiley and Sons, New York, Chichester,

Brisbane and Toronto. 293 pp.

77

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Duponnois, R., Mateille, T. and Gueye, M., (1995). Biological characterization ion and effects of two strains of Arthrobotrys oligospora from Senegal on Meloidogyne species parasitizing tomato plants. Biological Science and Technology 5: 517-525pp

Eisenback, J. D., Sasser, J., & Carter, C. (1985). Diagnostic characters useful in the identification of the four most common species of root -knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.). An advanced treatise on Meloidogyne, 1, 95-112.

Everitt BS, Landa S, Leese M. (2001). Cluster analysis (4th edn). New York: Oxford University

Press.

EVANS, G. A., H. L. C. Romroy, and R. O. Choa. (1993). The Tenuipalpidae of Honduras. Florida

Entomologist 76(1): 126-155.

FAO (2012). Production Year book, Rome, Italy.

Fortuner, R. (1986). Notes brèves. Revue Nématol, 9(3), 277-279.

Filipejev (1936). In Hamedan and its biology.

FAO (1996). "World Food Summit archive, FAO". fao.org. Retrieved 15 October 2016.

FAO. 1994. Production yearbook vol. 28. Food and Agric. Organization UN Rome, Italy.

(Freckman, 1997). Sugar centrifugation method for extraction of nematodes.

Garrido, M. da S., Soares, A. C. F., Coimbra, J. L. and Sousa, C. da S. (2008). Management of crotalaria and pigeon pea for control of yam nematode diseases. Summa Phytopathologica 34

(3): 222-227.

78

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Gaspard, J. T., Jaffee, B. A. and Ferris, H. (1990). Association of Verticillium chlamydosporium and Paecilomyces lilacinus with root-knot nematode infested soil. Journal of Nematology 22: 207-

213.

Germani, G., Baujard, P. and Luc, M. (1985). Control of Phytoparasitic Nematodes in the

Basin Arachidier of Senegal, p. 16. Senegal: ORSTOM.

Goodey, J. B. (1952). Rotylenchus coheni n. sp. (Nematoda: Tylenchida) parasitic on the roots of

Hippeastrum sp. Journal of Helminthology 26: 91-96.

Hahn, S. K., Isoba, J. C. G. and Ikotun, T. (1989). Resistance breeding in root and tuber crops at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan. Nigeria Crop Protection 5:

147–168.

Halweil, B. (2002). Home grown: the case for local food in a global market (Vol. 163).

World watch Institute.

Hewlett TE, Tarjan AC (1983). Synopsis of the genus Melodoigyne goldi, 1987. Nematropica

13:79-102.

Hemeng, O B. (1981). Efficacy of selected nematicides for the control of root not nematodes

Meloidogyne spp. In Ghana. In proceedings of the research planning conference on Meloidogyne spp

Hugot, J. P., Baujard, P. and Morand, S. (2001). Biodiversity in helminths and nematodes as a field of study: an overview. Nematology. 3: 199-208.

Humphreys, D. (2010). Determination of plant parasitic nematodes associated with yams

(Dioscorea spp.) and yampee (D. trifida) and its diagnosis in three regions of Costa Rica. MSc

Thesis. University of Costa Rica, San José. Costa Rica.

79

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Humphreys-Pereira D. A., Williamson, V.M., Lee, S., Coyne, D.L., Salazar, L., Gómez-

Alpízar, L. (2014). Molecular and morphological characterisation of Scutellonema bradys from yam in Costa Rica and development of specific primers for its detection. Nematology 16(2):137-

147. (Abstract).

80

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Hooper, D. (1990). Extraction and Processing of Plant and Soil Nematodes: In M.S. Luc., R. A.

Sikora and J. Bridge. Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture.

Wallingford UK. CABI International. 58 pp.

Hooper DU, Adair EC, Cardinale BJ, Byrnes JEK, Hungate BA, Matulich

KL, Gonzalez A, Duffy JE, Gamfeldt L, O'Connor MI (2005). A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change, Nature, vol. 486 (105-108)

Hunt, D. J., Luc, M and Manzamilla-Lopez, R.H (2005). Identification Morphology of Plant

Parasitic Nematodees In: Luc, M Sikora, R. A and Bridge, J (Eds) Plant Parasi t ic Nematodes in

Troical and Sub tropical Agriculture 2nd edi t ion CABI publishing pp 11-52

IITA, (2000). Annual Report of Project 14 – Impact, Policy and Systems Analysis, Nigeria. 84 pp.

IITA, (2004). Plant Health Management Annual Report. Ibadan, Nigeria. 118 pp.

IITA, (2005). Plant Health Management Annual Report. Ibadan, Nigeria. 214 pp.

IITA, (2007). Plant Health Management Annual Report. Ibadan, Nigeria. 124 -148 p.

Jatala, P. and Bridge, J. (1990). Nematode Parasites of Root and Tuber Crops. In: Plant Parasitic

Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture. Luc, M., Sikora, R.A. and Bridge, J., eds.

CAB International. Wallingford, UK. 137 – 180 p.

Jabbar I, H., Niknam, G., Panahandeh, J., & Boland Nazar, S. (2006). Study on the biodiversi ty of plant parasitic nematodes (Criconematoidea Taylor, 1936) in vegetable fields of Tabr iz. Proc.

17th Iran. Plant Protec. Cong., Tehran, Iran, 209.

81

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Joseph O Honger, Samuel K Offei, Kwadwo A Oduro, George T Odamtten & Seloame T

Nyaku (2016). Identification and molecular characterisation of Colletotrichum species from avocado, citrus and pawpaw in Ghana, South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 33:3, 177-185.

Jepson, S. B. (1983). Identification of Meloidogyne: a general assessment and comparison of male morphology using light microscopy, with a key to 24 species. Annual Review of Nematology

6:291-309.

Jabbari, H. and Niknam, G. (2006). SEM observations and morphometrics of the cabbage cyst nematode, Heterodera cruciferae Franklin, 1945, collected where Brassica spp. are grown in

Tabriz, Iran. Turkey Journal of Zoology 32:253-262.

Karnick, C. R. (1969). Dioscorea (Yam). The food of the slaves, with potentials for newer drugs.

A review. Pharmaceutical biology 9: 1372-1391.

Kumar, N. and Singh, K. P. (2010). Bioefficacy of Spore Suspensions and Mass Culture of

Dactylaria brochopaga on Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and White) Chitwood Causing Root-

Knot Disease of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Asian Journal of Plant Pathology 5:

54-61.

Knorth, J. (1993). Traditional storage of Yams and cassava and its improvement GTZ-Post harvest Project Germany.

Kwoseh, C. K. and Krapa, H. N. (2008). Host status of yam component crops to Scutellonema bradys (steiner and Le Hew) Andrassy. Journal of science and Technology 28 (2).

Kwoseh, C. K. (2000). Identification of resistance to major nematode pest of yams (Dioscorea spp.) in West Africa. PhD Thesis, University of Reading, UK.

82

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Kwoseh, C. K., Plowright, R. A., Bridge, J. and Asiedu, R. (2005). Yam-based farm practices and nematode problems in stored yams (Dioscorea spp.) in Ghana. Journal of Science and

Technology 25 (2): 35-43.

Keren-Zur, M., Antonov, J., Berconvitz, A., Feldman, K., Husid, A., Keran, G., Marcov, N.

& Rebhun, M. (2000). Bacillus furmus formulations for the safe control of root-knot nematode.

47-52 pp. In: The BCPC Conf. Pests & Disease, Brighton, UK.

Lambshead, P. J. D. (1993). Recent developments in marine benthic biodiversity research.

Ocea´nis, 20: 97–117.

Luc, M., Hunt, D. J. and Manchon, J.E. (1990). Morphology, Anatomy and Biology of Plant

Parasitic Nematodes-a Snopsis. In: M. S. Luc., R.A. Sikora. And J. Bridge. Plant Parasitic

Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture. Wallingfrod. UK: CAB International. 25 – 42 p.

Luc, M., Sikora, R. A. and Bridge, J. (2005). Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Tropic and

Subtropical Agriculture. 2nd Edition. CABI International, Wallingford, Oxford, UK. 871 pp.

Mai, W. F. and Abawi, G. S. (1987). Inter-reactions among root-knot nematodes and Fusarium wilt fungi on host plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology 25:317-38

Morgan, A. (1971). Classification of the genera and higher categories of order Tylenchida

(Nematoda). In: Zuckerman, B.M., Mai, W.F. and Rohde, R.A. (eds), Plant parasitic nematodes.

Morphology, Anatomy, Taxonomy and Ecology. 1: 16-24.

MoFA-SRID, (2013). `Agriculture in Ghana` Facts and Figures. Ministry of Food and

Agriculture (MoFA), Statistics, Research and Information Directorate (SRID), Ghana.46 pp.

MoFA-SRID, (2014). `Agriculture in Ghana` Facts and Figures. Ministry of Food and

83

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Agriculture (MoFA), Statistics, Research and Information Directorate (SRID), Ghana.

McBride, D. C., Burgman-Habermehl, C., Alpert, J., & Chitwood, D. D. (1986). Drugs and homicide. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 62(5), 497–508.

Morse, S., Acholo, M., McNamara, N. and Oliver, R. (2001). Control of storage insects as a means of limiting yam tuber fungal rots. Journal off stored products research 36(1):37-45.

Maggenti, A. R. (1983). Nematode higher classification as influenced by species and family concepts. Pp. 25–40 in A. R. Stone, H. M. Platt, L. F. Khalil, eds. Concepts in nematode systematics. New York: Academic

Press.

Maggenti, A.M. (1981). General Nematology. Springer Verlag, New York.

Neher, D. A., Weicht, T. R., Moorhead, D. L., and Sinsabaugh, R. L. (2010). Elevated CO2 alters functional attributes of nematode communities in forest soils. Functional Ecology 18:584–

591.

Nguyen, T. T. (2010). A compative polyphasic study of 10 Pratylenchus coffeae populations from

Vietnam. PHd. Thesis. Universiteit Leuven, Groep Wetenschap and Technologie, Arenberg

Doctoratsschool, W. de Croyolaan 6, 300 Hervelee, Belgie. 30 – 51 p.

Nwauzor, E. C. (1982). Identification, biology and control of root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne spp. On edible yams, Dioscorea spp. in Eastern Nigeria. PhD thesis. University of Ibadan, Ibadan,

Nigeria. 233 pp.

84

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Nwauzor, E. C. and Fawole, B. (1981). Root-knot nematodes on yams in Eastern Nigeria. In:

Proceedings of the Third Research Planning Conference on Root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne spp. 16-20 November, IITA. Ibadan, Nigeria. 161 – 167 p.

Norton, D. C. (1979). Relationship of physical and chemical factors to production of plant parasitic nematodes Annual Review of Phytopathology 17: 279-299.

Oluwe, T, (1978). Importance of root-knot nematodes on cowpea Vigna ungulculata (L) Walp in

Nigeria. In: Proceedings of the International Meloidogyne Project 3rd Planning Conference on Root

Knot Nematodes. 15-20 Nov1991 IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria p85-109

Osei, K., Addico, R., Nafeo, A., Adu-Kwarteng, E., Agyeman, A., Danso, Y. and Sackey-

Asante, J. (2011). Effect of some organic waste extracts on hatching of Meloidogyne incognita eggs. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6:2255-2259.

Osei, K., Addico, R., Nafeo, A., Adu-Kwarteng, E., Agyeman, A., Danso, Y. and Sackey-

Asante, J. (2012). Effect of some organic waste extracts on hatching of Meloidogyne incognita eggs. Africa Journal of Agricultural Research 6:2255-2259.

Osagie, A. U. (1992). The yam tuber in storage.

Orion, D., Wergin, W. P., Chitwood, D. J., & Erbe, E. F. (1950). Low-Temperature Scanning

Electron Microscope Observations of the Meloidogyne incognita Egg Mass: The Gelatinous

Matrix and Embryo Development. Journal of Nematology, 26(4), 402–411.

Ogundana, S. K., Naqvi, S.H.Z., and Ekundayo, J. A. (1970). Fungi associated with soft rot of yams Dioscorea spp. in storage in Nigeria. Trans. Br.

Mycol. Soc. 54: 445-451.

85

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Orley (1880).The genera and species of the subfamily Rhabditinae Micoletzky, 1922 (Nematoda): a nomenclatorial analysis, including an addendum on the composition of the family Rhabditidae.

Ogundana, S. K., Naqvi, S. H. Z., and Ekundayo, J. A. (1971). Studies on the soft rot of yams in storage in Nigeria. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 56:73-80.

Passam, H. C., and Noon, K. A. (1977). Deterioration of yams and cassava during storage.

Ann. Appl. Biol. 85:375-379.

Robertson, G. L. and Lupien, J. R. (2008). Minimizing Postharvest Losses in Yam (Dioscorea spp.): Treatments and Techniques. International Union of Food Science and technology. 4: 13 –

122.

Singh S. K (2009). Morphological and molecular characterization of root-knot nematode

(Meloidogyne spp.) diversity in Fiji. Thesis presented to the University of the South Pacific p 1-

78

Sikora, R. A. and Fernandez, E. (2005). Nematode parasites of vegetables. 319-392 p. In: Plant

Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture. Luc M., Sikora R. A. and Bridge J.,

(Eds.). CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. 335 pp.

Siddiqi, M. R. (2000). Tylenchida parasites of plants and insects, 2nd edition. Wallingford, UK,

CABI Publishing. 246 pp.

Sher, S. A. (1964). Revision of the Hoplolaiminae (Nematoda) III Scutellonema (1958)

Nematologica; 421-443Andrassy.

Seloame Tatu Nyaku, Yahaya Saaka Jamani, Eric Cornelius & Hanif Lutuf (2015).

Morphometric characterisation of Scutellonema bradys populations from the Guinea Savanna and

86

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Transitional Rain Forest ecological zones of Ghana, South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 35:3,

187-197

Siddiqi, M. R. (1972). Two new species of Scutellonema from cultivated soils in Africa with a description of Hoplolaimus aorolaimoides sp. n. from Portugal (Nematoda: Hoplolaiminae).

Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington. 39: 7-13.

Siddiqi M.R. (2000). Tylenchida parasites of plants and insects (2nd edn). Wallingford: CABI

Publishing.

Steiner, G. and LeHew, R. R. (1933). Hoplolaimus bradys n. sp. (Tylenchidae, Nematoda) the cause of disease of yam (Dioscorea sp.). Zoologischer Anzeiger 101: 260-264.

Speijer P. P, Sango, F. and Vuylsteke, D. (2000). Evaluation of host plant response to nematodes in Musa germplasm in Uganda: Acta Horticulturae 540: 225-232.

Simpson CE, Starr JL, Church GT, Burow MD, Paterson AH. (2001). Registration of

‘NemaTAM’ peanut. Crop Science. 43:1561.

Tchabi, A. (2008). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the sub – Saharan savannas of Benin and their association with yam (Dioscorea spp.): Potential of yam growth and reduction of nematode infestation. PHd Thesis. Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultat der universitat Basel. Switzerland. 233 pp.

Thom, C., and Raper, K. B. (1945). A manual of the Aspergilli. The Williams and Wilkins Co.

Baltimore, MD, USA. 373pp.

Sultan and Ferris (1991). The effect of soil moisture and soil particular size on the survival and population increase of Xiphinema index. Department of Nematology, University of California,

Davis, CA 95616, USA.

87

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Sessay, L., Norman, P. E., Massaquoi, A., Kobba, F., Allieu, A. P., Gboku, M. L. and Fomba,

S. N. (2013). Assessment of farmers` indigenous knowledge and select ion criteria of yam in Sierra

Leone. Njala Agricultural Research Centre (NARC). Freetown, Sierra Leone. Sky Journal of

Agricultural Research 2(1):1-6.

Sasser, J. N., & Freckman, D. W. (1987). Vistas on Nematology, Hyattsville, MD: Soc.

Seinhorst, J. (1966). Killing nematodes for taxonomic study with hot F. A. 4:1. Nematological

12:178

Shurtleff, M. C., & Averre, C. W. (2000). Diagnosing plant diseases caused by nematodes.

American Phytopathological Society (APS Press).

Starr, M., St-Amand, L. & Bérard-Therriault, L. (2002). State of phytoplankton in the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence during 2001. DFO Can. Sci. Advisory Sec. Res. Doc. 23 p.

Van den Berg, E. and Heyns, J. (1973). South Africa Hoplolaiminea. The genus Scutellonema

Van de Berg, E., Tiedt, L. R., Coyne, D. L., Ploeg, A. T., Navas-Cortes, J. A., Roberts, A. P.,

Yeates, G. W. and Subbotin, S. A. (2013). Morphological and molecular characterization and diagnostics of some species Scutellonema Andrassy, 1958 (Tylenchida: Hoplolaimidae) with a molecular phylogeny of the genus. Nematology. 00 (2013): 1 – 27.

Yahaya Saaka Jamani (2015). Morphometric characterisation of Scutellonema bradys populations from the Guinea Savanna and Transitional Rain Forest ecological zones of Ghana,

South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 35:3, 187-197

88

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Viaene, N., Duran, L.F., Rivera, M.J., Duenas. J., Rowe, P. and De Weale, D. (2003).

Response of banana and plantain cultivars, lines and hybrids to the burrowing nematode

Radopholus similis. Nematoligica 3: 34- 46

Wachira, P. M., Kimenju, J. W., Okoth, S.A. and Mibey, R. K. (2009). Stimulation of nematode- destroying fungi by organic amendments applied in management of plant parasitic nematodes.

Asian Journal of Plant Science, 8: 153-159.

Whitehead, A. G. (1968). Taxonomy of Meloidogyne (Nematoda: Heteroderidae) with description of four new species. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 31:263- 401.

Ward JH. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the

American Statistical Association 58: 236–244.

Yahaya, Y. (2011). Identification of nematodes and morphological characterisation of scutellonema bradys associated with yam from Guinea Savanna and Fransitional rain forest ecological zones of Ghana. M.Phil. thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, UG.

89

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

APPENDIX (I)

SURVEY ON NEMATODES ASSOCIATED

WITH YAM PRODUCTION IN THE

KRACHI NCHUMURU DISTRICT OF THE VOLTA REGION OF GHANA

Documentation of farmers’ knowledge, perceptions, and experiences concerning occurrence and management of nematodes associated with yam production.

QUESTIONAIRE NO......

Demographic characteristics

Name of farmer……………………...... ……………………

Sex: Male 1 Female 2

Age of respondent:

< 20 = 1

21 – 30 = 2

31 – 40 = 3

41 – 50 = 4

>50 = 5

Level of education: Primary [1] Middle sch. /JHS [2] Secondary [3] Tertiary [4] none [5]

Name of community……………………………………….

How long have you been in yam farming? 1 – 5yrs [1]: 6 – 10yrs [2]: 11 – 15yrs [3] >15 [4]

Size of farm, year of cultivation and source of planting material

90

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

YEAR OF SIZE OF FARM SOURCE OF PLANTING CULTIVATION (ACRE) MATERIAL

2013

2014

2015

2016

Code: Size of farm: 0-1 acre [1], 1-2 acres [2], 3-4 acres [3] 5-8 acres [4] more than 8 acres [5]

Source of planting material: own farm [1], family member [2], market [3], others (specify)…………….

1. What are the varieties of yam grown in your farm?

VARIETY PROPORTION OF FARM

Code for proportion: < 1 acre [1], 1-2 acres [2], 3-5 acres [3] ˃5acres [ 4]

A. Land use intensity

2. How long have you cultivated this land 1-3 years [1] 4- 6 years [2] 7-10 years [3]

11-15 years [4] more than 15 years [5]

3. What type of crop(s) have you planted on this piece of land in the past five (5) years?

Yam [1] Cassava [2] Cowpea [3] Maize [4] Soybean [5]

91

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Other (specify)……………………………………………………………… 4. How long have you planted yam on this piece of land: 1-3 years [1], 4-6 years [2]

7-10 years [3], more than 10 years [4]

5. Have you rotated your yam crops before Yes [1] No [1]

6. If yes, with what crop(s)…………………………...... ………………

7. What was the period of rotation: 1-2 year [1], 3-5 year [2], more than 5 years [3]

8. Have you practice land fallow in the past? Yes [1], No [2]

9. If yes, how long was the fallow period? 1 year [1], 2-4 years [2], 5-10 years [3]

B. Farmers’ knowledge, perception and experience concerning occurrence of nematodes on farm and in storage.

10. Do you experience any pests and disease problem in your yam crops during the growing season?

Yes [1] No [2]

11. Do you know what nematodes are? Yes [1] No [2]

12. Which of your varieties do you observe these symptoms more?

13. Which of these symptoms and signs do you observe in your yam field?

S/N SYMPTOMS/ SIGN YES [1] / NO [2]

1 Necrotic streaks or lesions on roots

2 Reduced rooting system

3 internal rotting or discolorations of vegetative organs

4 Dwarfing

92

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

5 Stunting and resetting

14. What are the conditions of the soil in your field in which these signs/symptoms are prevalent?

a. Lowland sandy soil (waterlogged) [ ] b. Well drained sandy loam soil [ ] c. Sandy – clayey [ ] d. sandy soil [ ] e. Loamy soil [ ] f. Clayey soil [ ]

15. Where do you store your yam after harvest? a. Under a tree in the farm [ ] b. Yam barn at home/farm [ ] c. In a store at home [ ] d. In a farmstead [ ]

16. Do you experience any loses in storage due to pests and diseases? Yes [1] No [2]

17. If yes, what signs/symptoms do you observe in the stored tubers?

S//N SIGN/SYMPTOM YES [1] / NO [2]

1 Hardened and dried tissues with vary discolorations

2 External cracks on skin of tubers

3 Significant weight loses in tubers

4 Light yellow lesions below the outer skin of the tuber

5 Rotting of the outer 1 – 2cm layer

6 Flaking off- of external coverings exposing patches of dark brown

93

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

7 General decay of tubers

Codes for response: Yes [1] No [2]

C. Farmers knowledge, perception and experiences concerning control/ management

18. How do nematodes spread? [A] infected tubers [B] Soil [C] Contaminated Implements [D] Weeds

19. Are you able to manage / control nematode infestation? a. [Yes} b. [No]

20. If Yes, what are some of the management practice used in your farm

S/N MANAGEMENT PRACTICE YES/NO

1 Crop rotation

2 Use of Nematicides

3 Land rotation

4 Use of organic/ inorganic fertilizers

5 Others (specify)

Response codes: Yes [1] No [2]

21. If No, give reasons. A. [no reason] b. [I do not know how to control them] c. Other, (please specify)………………………………………………………………………

D. Farmer knowledge, perception and experiences concerning economic importance of nematodes

22. What are some of the reasons why you cultivate yam? ......

23. Estimated loses as result of nematode infestation.

94

University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh

Year Farm sizeExpected yield Quantity Quantity Percentage (acres) harvested (100stored (100loses (%) due (100 tubers) tubers) tubers) to nematodes

2013

2014

2015

2016

24. Was yield higher than expected (1) yes (2) no

25. Where actual yields higher than expected yield, give reason:

No. reason [1], favorable rainfall [2], Use of inorganic/ organic fertilizers [3], Higher soil fertility

[4], Others (specify)………………………

26. Please explain the effect of nematodes parasitism on the following:

I. Money to pay children’s school fees………………………...... ……………………………………….

II. Money to repay loans……...... ……………………………...…………………………

III. Money to buy assets…………………………………………...…………………………

IV. Money to pay medical bills………………………………………………………………………...

V. Your relationship with extension officers…………………...... ……………………......

VI. Your relationship with spouse and neighbours…………………………...... …………………………….

95