Mig-6 Controls EGFR Trafficking and Suppresses Gliomagenesis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Mig-6 controls EGFR trafficking and suppresses gliomagenesis Haoqiang Yinga,1, Hongwu Zhenga,1, Kenneth Scotta, Ruprecht Wiedemeyera, Haiyan Yana, Carol Lima, Joseph Huanga, Sabin Dhakala, Elena Ivanovab, Yonghong Xiaob,HaileiZhangb,JianHua, Jayne M. Stommela, Michelle A. Leea, An-Jou Chena, Ji-Hye Paika,OresteSegattoc, Cameron Brennand,e, Lisa A. Elferinkf,Y.AlanWanga,b, Lynda China,b,g, and Ronald A. DePinhoa,b,h,2 aDepartment of Medical Oncology, bBelfer Institute for Applied Cancer Science, Belfer Foundation Institute for Innovative Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; cLaboratory of Immunology, Istituto Regina Elena, Rome 00158, Italy; dHuman Oncology and Pathogenesis Program and eDepartment of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065; fDepartment of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555; gDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; and hDepartment of Medicine and Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 Edited* by Webster K. Cavenee, Ludwig Institute, University of California, La Jolla, CA, and approved March 8, 2010 (received for review December 23, 2009) Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and lethal structural aberrations that serve as a key pathological driving primary brain cancer that is driven by aberrant signaling of growth force for tumor progression and many of them remain to be factor receptors, particularly the epidermal growth factor receptor characterized (6, 7). GBM possesses a highly rearranged genome (EGFR). EGFR signaling is tightly regulated by receptor endocytosis and high-resolution genome analysis has uncovered myriad and lysosome-mediated degradation, although the molecular somatic alterations on the genomic and epigenetic levels (2, 3). mechanisms governing such regulation, particularly in the context Here, using an integrated genomic and functional analysis, we of cancer, remain poorly delineated. Here, high-resolution ge- have identified Mig-6 as a candidate tumor suppressor that nomic profiles of GBM identified a highly recurrent focal 1p36 regulates EGFR trafficking and turnover in GBM cells. Mig-6 deletion encompassing the putative tumor suppressor gene, Mig- was originally identified as a mitogen-inducible gene and has 6. We show that Mig-6 quells the malignant potential of GBM cells been implicated in the feedback regulation of a variety of sig- and dampens EGFR signaling by driving EGFR into late endosomes naling processes, including the EGFR pathway (8–11). Ablation and lysosome-mediated degradation upon ligand stimulation. of Mig-6 was shown to induce tumor formation in various tissues, Mechanistically, this effect is mediated by the binding of Mig-6 supporting the tumor suppressor function of Mig-6 (12–14). to a SNARE protein STX8, a protein known to be required for late However, the role of Mig-6 during gliomagenesis is largely endosome trafficking. Thus, Mig-6 functions to ensure recruitment unknown. We report that Mig-6 functions to suppress the of internalized receptor to late endosomes and subsequently the malignant potential of GBM cells by enhancing EGFR traffick- lysosomal degradation compartment through its ability to specif- ing into late endosomes/lysosomes and promoting its degrada- fi ically link EGFR and STX8 during ligand-stimulated EGFR traf ck- tion. Further molecular and cell biology studies identified STX8, ing. In GBM, the highly frequent loss of Mig-6 would therefore a SNARE protein required for late-endosome fusion (15–17), as serve to sustain aberrant EGFR-mediated oncogenic signaling. a Mig-6-binding protein to form a complex with EGFR during Together, these data uncover a unique tumor suppression mecha- receptor trafficking. The strong interaction between Mig-6 and fi nism involving the regulation of receptor traf cking. STX8 upon ligand activation therefore ensures recruitment of internalized EGFR to late endosomes and subsequently the glioblastoma | vesicle | STX8 lysosomal degradation compartment. lioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive form Results Gof malignant glioma and stands as one of the most lethal Genomic analysis of GBM has revealed myriad alterations with cancers with median survival of ≈12–15 months (1). Extensive uncertain pathogenetic significance. Recurrent deletion of molecular and genomic studies of human glioma have identified chromosome 1p36 is among the most common genomic events in numerous genetic and genomic alterations resulting in activation multiple tumor types (18–23), although the structural complexity of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, most notably epidermal of these deletions and the uncertain definition of the commonly growth factor (EGFR), which is found to be amplified and targeted region have hampered definitive identification of overexpressed in ∼45% of primary GBMs, although much less potential tumor suppressor(s) (24). In recent high-resolution frequently in low-grade gliomas (2, 3). Clinically, overexpression array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of of EGFR has been correlated with poor prognosis in GBM GBM (18 tumors, 20 cell lines) that showed recurrent 1p36 patients (4), and the precise wiring of the EGFR network and deletion (Fig. 1A, 5/38; 13.2%), we delineated a unique 270-kb the regulation of its signaling pathway in GBM have always been minimal common region (MCR) of deletion containing only two an area of active investigation. It is well known that multiple known genes, PARK7 and Mig-6 (ERRFI1) (Fig. 1A), and mechanisms are engaged in the activation of the EGFR pathway during tumor initiation and progression, including receptor amplification and activating receptor mutations (5). Intriguingly, Author contributions: H. Ying, H. Zheng, L.C., and R.A.D. designed research; H. Ying, H. Zheng, K.S., H. Yan, C.L., J. Huang, S.D., E.I., J.M.S., A.-J.C., and J.-H.P. performed EGFR mutations occurring in GBM often involve the deletions research; R.W., O.S., and L.A.E. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; H. Ying, H. Zheng, in the extracellular domain or cytoplasmic tails, such as the R.W., E.I., Y.X., H. Zhang, J. Hu, and C.B. analyzed data; and H. Ying, H. Zheng, M.L., J.-H.P., EGFRvIII mutant missing the extracellular ligand binding L.A.E., Y.A.W., L.C., and R.A.D. wrote the paper. domain (5), whereas EGFR kinase domain mutations commonly The authors declare no conflict of interest. found in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are rare in GBM, *This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor. suggesting distinctive oncogenic EGFR networks in different 1H. Ying and H. Zheng contributed equally to this work. tumor types. 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. A hallmark feature of malignant glioma is its rampant genomic This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/ instability accompanied by numerous recurrent chromosomal 0914930107/DCSupplemental. 6912–6917 | PNAS | April 13, 2010 | vol. 107 | no. 15 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0914930107 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 Fig. 1. Mig-6 is deleted in GBM cell lines and tumor samples. (A) Array-CGH heat map detailing Mig-6 deletion at chromosome 1p36 in primary GBM tumor specimens. Regions of amplification and deletion are denoted in red and blue, respectively. (B) mRNA expression levels of PARK7 and Mig-6 in normal human astrocytes (NHA) and LN319 cells. (C) FISH analysis of Mig-6 deletion in the GBM cell line, LN319. The green signals (arrows) indicate Fig. 2. Mig-6 functions as a tumor suppressor. Reconstiting Mig-6 expression hybridization using a Mig-6-specific BAC probe, whereas the red signals in (A) LN319 or (B) LN464 cells inhibits cell proliferation. Vec, empty vector indicate hybridization using a chromosome 1-specific centrosome reference control. (C) Knockdown of Mig-6 expression in U87 cells (Inset) accelerates probe. (D) mRNA level of Mig-6 in NHA and GBM cell lines. (E) Mig-6 protein cellular proliferation. shSC, hairpin control. (D)(Left) Reconstitution of Mig-6 level analyzed by Western blot in NHA and GBM cell lines. expression in LN319 or LN464 cells attenuates anchorage-independent growth in soft agar. (Right) Histogram quantification. Error bars indicate ±SD [**, P = 0.002 (LN319) and 0.008 (LN464), n = 3]. (E)(Upper) Knockdown of showing corresponding decrease in the expression of these genes Mig-6 expression in U87 cells promotes anchorage-independent growth in in samples with genomic deletion (Fig. 1B). Consistent with our soft agar. (Lower) Histogram quantification. Error bars indicate ±SD (**, P = data, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset confirmed 0.001, n = 3). (F) Knockdown of Mig-6 expression in U87 cells promoted cell fi invasion in a Boyden chamber assay. (Upper) Representative images show the recurrent deletion of this region (62/339; 18.3%) that de ned an invasion of U87 cells expressing control (shSC and shMig-6-2) and targeting MCR containing seven known genes including PARK7 and Mig-6 shRNA (shMig-6-1) after 16-h induction with 10% FBS followed by crystal (Fig. S1). Most notably, Mig-6 expression is down-regulated at violet (0.2%) staining. (Lower) Histogram quantification. Error bars indicate ± both mRNA and protein levels in ∼50% of primary tumor samples SD (**, P = 0.003, n = 3). (G) shRNA targeting Mig-6 has no effect on soft and GBM cell lines, some of which do not show genomic deletion agar growth of LN319 cells. (H) Reconstitution of Mig-6 expression inhibits of Mig-6, indicating that additional mechanisms ensure Mig-6 soft agar growth of U87 cells expressing Mig-6 targeting shRNA (shMig-6-1). down-regulation in human GBM (Fig. 1 D and E). Whereas Error bars indicate ±SD (*, P = 0.03; **, P = 0.01; n =3). PARK7 is an oncogene that inhibits the PTEN tumor suppressor (25–27), Mig-6 shows many properties consistent with a tumor suppressor role including cancer-prone phenotypes in knockout (Fig.