DOCSLIB.ORG

Zoosymposia 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Zoosymposia 4: 339–345 (2010) ISSN 1178-9905 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zoosymposia/ ZOOSYMPOSIA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1178-9913 (online edition) Index to mite genus-group, family-group and higher taxon names A Aleuroglyphus 243 Armascirus 44 Abacarus 73, 74 Alismobates 208 Arotrobates 208 Abalakeus 95, 99 Alleustathia 264 Arrenuridae 114 ABEROPTINAE 61 Allodamaeus 198 Arrenuridae 24 Aberoptus 61 Allomycobates 214 ARRENURINAE 114 ABROLOPHINAE 99 Allonychus 139 ARRENUROIDEA 114 Abrolophus 95, 99 ALLOPTIDAE 262 Arrenurus 115 Absentia 69 Allopygmephorus 170 Arrenurus (Arrenurus) 114 Acalitus 64 Allosuctobelba 207 Arrenurus (Megaluracarus) 114, 115 Acanthonychus 139 ALLOTHROMBIINAE 101 Arrenurus (Truncaturus) 115 Acaphylla 66 Allothrombium 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 101 Asetacus 82 Acaphyllisa 66 Allozetes 214 Asetadiptacus 79 Acaralox 64 Amblyseiulella 290 Asetiabacarus 76 ACARAPINAE 179 Amblyseius 290, 291 Asetidicrothrix 68 ACARAPINI 179 AMERIDAE 200 Astegistes 203 Acarapis 179 Amerioppia 205 ASTEGISTIDAE 203 Acarelliptus 69 AMEROBELBIDAE 202 ATOPOCHTHONIIDAE 189 Acarhis 79 Amhyadesia 247 Atopochthonius 189 Acarhynchus 79 Anachipteria 210 Atractides (Atractides) 111 ACARICALINI 66 Analges 266 Atropacarus 193, 194 Acaridia 6 ANALGIDAE 262, 266 ATURIDAE 111 Acaridiae 242 ANALGOIDEA 262 ATURINAE 111 ACARONYCHIDAE 188 ANDEREMAEIDAE 200 Aturus 111 Acaronychus 188 Anderemaeus 200 Australhypopus 243 Acaropsella 160 Anhemialges 266 Austroceratoppia 203 Acaropsellina 161 ANISITSIELLIDAE 110 Austrotritia 193 ACAROPSELLINI 160 Annectacarus 191 Autogneta 208 Acarus 242 Annerossella 127 AUTOGNETIDAE 208 Aceria 64 Anothopoda 61 Avenzoaria 267 ACERIINI 64 Anthocoptes 76 AVENZOARIIDAE 262, 267 Acerimina 66 ANTHOCOPTINI 73 AXONOPSINAE 111 Achipteria 209 ANYSTIDAE 6, 7 Axonopsis (Hexaxonopsis) 111 ACHIPTERIIDAE 209 Anystis 7, 8 Acotyledon 242 Apalotacarus 245 B Acrogalumna 215 Aphis 98 Bak 161 Acrotocepheus 204 Aplonobia 138 Bakerina 140 Acrotritia 193 Apocaligonellidus 129 BAKINI 161 Aculochetus 74 Apodiptacus 79 Balaustium 99 Aculodes 74 Apolohmannia 192 BALAUTIINAE 99 Aculops 74, 75 Apontella 61 Baloghobates 214 Aculus 75, 76 Apoplophora 190 Banksinoma 208 Aegyptobia 154 ARBORICHTHONIIDAE 192 Barellea 8 AEROGLYPHIDAE 245 Arborichthonius 192 Bariella 63 Afronothrus 196 Archegocepheus 203 Basilobelba 201 Afrotydeus 52 Archegozetes 196 BASILOBELBIDAE 201 Agistemus 120, 121, 125–128 Archoplophora 190 Bdella 43, 45 Albia (Spinalbia) 111 Arcoppia 205 BDELLIDAE 43 ALBIINAE 111 Areekulus 82 Bdellodes 43, 45 Albonothrus 196 Aristadromips 291 BDELLOIDEA 6 339 Beeriphotia 245 Cecidophyopsis 63 Criotacus 70 Belba 198 Cenopalpus 154 Cryptacarus 191 Berlesezetes 200 CEPHEIDAE 199 CRYPTOGNATHIDAE 129, 126 Berndibula 211 Cepheus 199 Cryptognathus 126 Birsteinius 202 Ceratoppia 203 Cryptoppia 205 BLATTISOCIIDAE 6, 282 Ceratozetes 214 Ctenobelba 202 BLATTISOCIINAE 282 CERATOZETIDAE 214 CTENOBELBIDAE 202 Blattisocius 280, 282, 283 Ceraturoptellus 262 Ctenoglyphus 246 Blomia 246 Cereusacarus 70 Cuihuacarus 82 Boczekella 60 Cerophagopsis 243 Cultroribula 203 Brachioppia 205 Chanteius 291, 292 Cunaxa 43, 44 BRACHYCHTHONIIDAE 189 Charletonia 95, 96, 99 CUNAXIDAE 43, 44, 45 Brachychthonius 189 Chauliacia 264 Cunaxoides 44 Brasilopsis 170 Chaunoproctus 210 Cupacarus 70 Bregetovia 267 Cheiracus 82 Cycloppia 205 Brennandania 170 Cheiroseius 284 CYMBAEREMAEIDAE 209 Brephosceles 262 Chelacaropsis 161 Cyrthermannia 195 Brevipalpus 126, 154 Chelacheles 161 Cyta 43 Brevulacus 82 Cheletacarus 161 Bryobia 138 Cheletogenes 161 D BRYOBIINAE 138 CHELETOGENINI 161 Dactyloscirus 44 Bucculacus 79 Cheletomimus 161 Daidalotarsonemus 179 Bychovskiata 262, 267 Cheletomorpha 161 DAMAEIDAE 198 CHELETOMORPHINI 161 DAMAEOLIDAE 201 C Cheletonella 161 Damaeoppia 205 Caeculisoma 99 CHEYLETIDAE 6, 160 Damaeus 198, 199 Caenosamerus 200 Cheyletiella 161 Dendroptus 181 CALACARINI 67 CHEYLETIELLINI 161 Dengella 76 Calacarus 67 CHEYLETIINI 161 Dermatophagoides 264 Calcealges 264, 267 CHEYLETINI 161 DERMOGLYPHIDAE 263 Calepitrimerus 69 Cheyletus 161 Dermoglyphus 263 CALEREMAEIDAE 200 Cheylostigmaeus 128 Diamesoglyphus 246 Calesalquia 63 CHIRODISCIDAE 265 Diapterobates 214 Caligonella 126 Chorioptes 265 Dichopelmus 67 CALIGONELLIDAE 120, 126 CHORTOGLYPHIDAE 246 Dicolopodacus 61 Callidosoma 99 Chortoglyphus 246 Dicondyla 204 CALLIDOSOMATINAE 99 Circaces 63 Dicruvasates 70 Caloglyphus 243 Circellobates 208 DIPHYTOPTINI 63 CALOPPIIDAE 210 Clavaerythraeus 99 Diphytoptus 63 Calpentaconvexus 67 Coleopterophagus 245 Diplaegidia 262 Calvittacus 70 Coleoscirus 44 Diplobodes 204 Calyptostoma 95 COLOMERINI 63 DIPLODONTINAE 109 Camerobia 126 Colomerus 63 Diplodontus 109 CAMEROBIIDAE 120, 126 COLOPODACINI 61 Diptacus 79, 80 Camisia 194 Colopodacus 61 DIPTILOMIOPIDAE 23, 79 CAMISIIDAE 194 Columbicheyla 161 DIPTILOMIOPINAE 79 Campachipteria 210 Condyloppia 205 Diptilomiopus 80, 81 Canestrinia 245 Coproglyphus 246 Diptilorhynacus 81 CANESTRINIIDAE 245 Coptocheles 126 Disella 62 Carabodes 203, 204 Coptophylla 63 Dolicheremaeus 204 CARABODIDAE 203 Cosella 61 Dolichocybe 170 CARPOGLYPHIDAE 245 COSMOCHTHONIIDAE 192 DOLICHOCYBIDAE 170 Carpoglyphus 245 Cosmochthonius 192 DOLICHOCYBOIDEA 6, 170 Catarhinus 82 Cosmogalumna 215 Dolichodectes 267 Caudacheles 162 Cosmoglyphus 243 Dolichonobia 138 Cecidophyes 63 Cosmohermannia 195 Dolichotetranychus 154, 155 CECIDOPHYINAE 63 Costarectus 76 Dometorina 211 CECIDOPHYINI 63 Costeremus 201 Dudichoplophora 190 340 · Zoosymposia 4 © 2010 Magnolia Press ZHANG Dyobelba 199 Eurostocepheus 204 Glyptholaspis 274 Eurytetranychoides 140 Gohieria 246 E Eurytetranychus 140 Gongella 68 ECHIMYOPODIDAE 246 Euseius 292 Goyoppia 205 Echinacrus 76 Eustathia 264 Grallacheles 161 EDBAKERELLIDAE 51 EUSTATHIIDAE 264 Grallolichus 265 EDBAKERELLINAE 51 Eustigmaeus 128 Grammolichus 246 ENCENTRIDOPHORINAE 113 Eutogenes 161 Gustavia 203 Encentridophorus EUTRROMBIDIIDAE 96, 100 GUSTAVIIDAE 203 (Encentridophorus) 113 EUTRROMBIDIINAE 100 GYMNODAMAEIDAE 198 ENIOCHTHONIIDAE 190 Exothorhis 127 Gymnodamaeus 198 Eniochthonius 190 EYLAIDAE 109 Gymnodampia 200 Eobrachychthonius 189 Eylais 109, 110 Gymnoglyphus 264 Eohypochthonius 189, 190 EYLAOIDEA 109 Gynaeseius 293 Eotetranychus 126 Eotetranychus 139, 140 F H Epicecidophyes 63 Falculifer 264, 265 Hafenrefferia 202 Epidamaeus 199 FALCULIFERIDAE 264 Hainanarus 71 EPIDERMOPTIDAE 263, 267 Falsivalgothrombium 96 Hammerabates 213 Epieremulus 200 Favognathus 126, 127 Hammerella 205 Epilohmannia 192 Fenestrella 201 Haplacarus 191 EPILOHMANNIIDAE 192 Fessonia 95, 100 HAPLOCHTHONIIDAE 192 Epilohmannoides 193 Ficotarsonemus 179 Haplochthonius 192 Epitrimerus 70 Fissicepheus 204 Haplozetes 212 EREMAEIDAE 202 Flagrosuctobelba 207 HAPLOZETIDAE 212 Eremaeozetes 200 Floracarus 62 Hauptmannia 99 EREMAEOZETIDAE 200 Forelia (Forelia) 113 Heminothrus 194 Eremaeus 202 FORELINAE 112 Hemisarcoptes 247 Eremella 209 Fortuynia 208 HEMISARCOPTIDAE 247 EREMELLIDAE 209 FORTUYNIIDAE 208 Hemiscolocenus 68 Eremobelba 201 Fosseremus 201 HEMITARSONEMINI 180 EREMOBELBIDAE 201 Fragariocoptes 61 Hemitarsonemus 181 EREMULIDAE 201 Freyanella 265 Hermannia 197 Eremulus 201 Fujianacarus 70 Hermanniella 197 Ereynetidae 51 Fungitarsonemus 179 HERMANNIELLIDAE 197 Eriophyes 63 Furcobates 214 HERMANNIIDAE 197 ERIOPHYIDAE 23, 61 Furcoribula 203 Heterobelba 201 ERIOPHYINAE 63 Fuscozetes 214 HETEROBELBIDAE 201 ERIOPHYINI 63 Heterocoptes 247 ERIOPHYOIDEA 6, 57, 60 G HETEROCOPTIDAE 247 Eryngiopus 128 Galendromus 293 Heterotergum 76 Erynglpusopsis 128 Galumna 215, 216 HEXATHROMBIINAE 100 ERYTHRAEIDAE 95, 96, 99 Galumnella 216 Hexathrombium 100 ERYTHRAEINAE 99 GALUMNELLIDAE 216 Hirstia 264 ERYTHRAEOIDEA 94, 99 GALUMNIDAE 215 Hirstithrombium 96, 100 Erythraeus (Erythraeus) 99 Gammaphytoptus 63 Histiogaster 243 Erythraeus 95 GEHYPOCHTHONIIDAE 192 Histiostoma 247 Eucheyletia 162 Gehypochthonius 192 HISTIOSTOMATIDAE 247 EUGLYCYPHAGIDAE 246 Gemmazetes 208 Hoffmannita 161 Eulohmannia 192 Gerloubia 211 HOMOCALIGIDAE 120, 127 EULOHMANNIIDAE 192 Ghilarovus 214 Homocaligus 127 EUPALOPSELLIDAE 120, 127 Gibbicepheus 204 Honiarrea 247 Eupalopsellus 127 Gioharattia 245 Hornophyes 67 Eupelops 209 Glossilus 71 Hughesiella 264 EUPHTHIRACARIDAE 193 Glycycometus 245 Humerobates 215 Euphthiracarus 193 Glycyphagidae 246 HUMEROBATIDAE 215 Eupterotegaeus 199 Glycyphagus 246 HYADESIIDAE 247 Euroglyphus 264 Glyptacus 63 Hydrachna (Diplohydrachna) 108 INDEX Zoosymposia 4 © 2010 Magnolia Press · 341 Hydrachna (Hydrachna) 109 Lassenia 95, 100 MALACONOTHRIDAE 196 Hydrachna (Rhabdohydrachna) 109 Laterolimnochares 110 Malaconothrus 196 HYDRACHNIDAE 108 Latituda 67 Malayoglyphus 264 Hydrachnidia 6 Lauritzenia 212 Mamersa 109 HYDRACHNOIDEA 108 Lauroppia 206 MAMERSINAE 109 Hydrodroma 109 Lebertia (Lebertia) 110 Masthermannia 195 HYDRODROMIDAE 109 Lebertia (Pilolebertia) 110 Mediugum 81 Hydryphantes (Hydryphantes) 109 LEBERTIOIDAE 110 Megalotocepheus 204, 205 HYDRYPHANTIDAE 109 LEBERTRIOIDEA 110 MEGEREMAEIDAE 202 HYDRYPHANTINAE 109 Ledermuelleriopsis 128 Megeremaeus 202 HYDRYPHANTOIDEA 109 LEEWENHOEKIIDAE 94 Megninia 262, 266 Hygrobates (Hygrobates) 111, 112 Leipothrix 71 Megniniella 262 Hygrobates (Rivobates) 112 Leobodes 205 Melanozetes 214 HYGROBATIDAE 111 Lepidacarus 191 Melisia 245 HYGROBATOIDEA 111 Lepidocheyla 162 Meristacarus 191 HYPOCHTHONIIDAE 189 Lepidoglyphus 246, 247 Meristolohmannia 191 Hypochthonius 190 Lepidozetes 210 Mesalges 267 Hypovertex 209 LEPTINAE 100 Mesalox 76 Hypozetes 210 Leptogalumna 215 Mesobryobia 138 Leptothrombium 96, 100 MESOPLOPHORIDAE 190 I Leptus 95, 100 MESOSTIGMATA 23, 24, 288 Idiozetes 209
Recommended publications
  • Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) on Plants of the Family Solanaceae

    Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) on Plants of the Family Solanaceae

    Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) on plants of the family Solanaceae: results of a survey in the south of France and a review of world biodiversity Marie-Stéphane Tixier, Martial Douin, Serge Kreiter To cite this version: Marie-Stéphane Tixier, Martial Douin, Serge Kreiter. Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) on plants of the family Solanaceae: results of a survey in the south of France and a review of world biodiversity. Experimental and Applied Acarology, Springer Verlag, 2020, 28 (3), pp.357-388. 10.1007/s10493-020- 00507-0. hal-02880712 HAL Id: hal-02880712 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02880712 Submitted on 25 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Experimental and Applied Acarology https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-020-00507-0 Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) on plants of the family Solanaceae: results of a survey in the south of France and a review of world biodiversity M.‑S. Tixier1 · M. Douin1 · S. Kreiter1 Received: 6 January 2020 / Accepted: 28 May 2020 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Abstract Species of the family Phytoseiidae are predators of pest mites and small insects. Their biodiversity is not equally known according to regions and supporting plants.
  • Amblyseiinae of New Zealand (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Redescriptions, Rediscoveries, New Records, New Combinations and Keys to Species

    Amblyseiinae of New Zealand (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Redescriptions, Rediscoveries, New Records, New Combinations and Keys to Species

    Zootaxa 4658 (2): 201–222 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4658.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:13429195-C5D1-4F10-9C3F-EBC6CDF89D8C Amblyseiinae of New Zealand (Acari: Phytoseiidae): redescriptions, rediscoveries, new records, new combinations and keys to species MIN MA1, QING-HAI FAN2 & ZHI-QIANG ZHANG3,4* 1 College of Agronomy, Shanxi Agriculture University, Taigu, Shanxi, China 2 Plant Health & Environment Laboratory, Ministry for Primary Industries, Auckland, New Zealand 3 Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand 4 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper presents several new additions and changes to the subfamily Amblyseiinae of New Zealand. Amblyseius lentiginosus Denmark & Schicha, 1974 is newly recorded in New Zealand and its males and females are redescribed in detail. Amblyseius obtusus was recollected and a revised key to New Zealand species of Amblyseius is provided. Proprioseiopsis lenis (Corpuz & Rimando, 1966) is reported from New Zealand for the first time and its females are described in detail. A key to New Zealand species of Proprioseiopsis is also included. A rare species, Phytoscutus acaridophagus (Collyer, 1964), was rediscovered and its males and females are redescribed in detail. Three species, two in Amblyseius and one in Proprioseiopsis, are transferred to the genus Graminaseius: G. bidibidi (Collyer, 1964) comb. nov., G. martini (Collyer, 1982) comb. nov. and G. exopodalis (Kennett, 1958) comb.
  • Actual Problems of Protection and Sustainable Use of the Animal World Diversity

    Actual Problems of Protection and Sustainable Use of the Animal World Diversity

    ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF MOLDOVA DEPARTMENT OF NATURE AND LIFE SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY Actual problems of protection and sustainable use of ThE animal world diversity International Conference of Zoologists dedicated to the 50th anniversary from the foundation of Institute of Zoology of ASM Chisinau – 2011 ACTUAL PRObLEMS OF PROTECTION AND SUSTAINAbLE USE OF ThE ANIMAL wORLD DIVERSITY Content CZU 59/599:502.74 (082) D 53 Dumitru Murariu. READING ABOUT SPECIES CONCEPT IN BIOLOGY.......................................................................10 Dan Munteanu. AChievements Of Romania in ThE field Of nature The materials of International Conference of Zoologists „Actual problems of protection and protection and implementation Of European Union’S rules concerning ThE biodiversity conservation (1990-2010)...............................................................................11 sustainable use of animal world diversity” organized by the Institute of Zoology of the Aca- demy of Sciences of Moldova in celebration of the 50th anniversary of its foundation are a gene- Laszlo Varadi. ThE protection and sustainable use Of Aquatic resources.....................................13 ralization of the latest scientific researches in the country and abroad concerning the diversity of aquatic and terrestrial animal communities, molecular-genetic methods in systematics, phylo- Terrestrial Vertebrates.................................................................................................................................................15
  • Revised Catalog of the Mite Family Phytoseiidae

    Revised Catalog of the Mite Family Phytoseiidae

    ZOOTAXA 434 A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae G.J. DE MORAES, J.A. MCMURTRY, H.A. DENMARK & C.B. CAMPOS Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand G.J. DE MORAES, J.A. MCMURTRY, H.A. DENMARK & C.B. CAMPOS A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae (Zootaxa 434) 494 pp.; 30 cm. 18 February 2004 ISBN 1-877354-24-4 (Paperback) ISBN 1-877354-25-2 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2004 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41383 St. Lukes Auckland 1030 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2004 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to re- produce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) Zootaxa 434: 1–494 (2004) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 434 Copyright © 2004 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae G.J. DE MORAES1,2, J.A. MCMURTRY3, H.A. DENMARK4 & C.B. CAMPOS2 1CNPq Researcher (e-mail [email protected]); 2Depto. Entomologia, Fitopatologia e Zoologia Agrícola, Universidade de São Paulo/ Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, 13418-900 Piracicaba-SP, Brazil; 3 University of California and Oregon State University, P.
  • Semi-Automated Identification of Biological Control Agent Using

    Semi-Automated Identification of Biological Control Agent Using

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Semi‑automated identifcation of biological control agent using artifcial intelligence Jhih‑Rong Liao1, Hsiao‑Chin Lee1, Ming‑Chih Chiu2,3* & Chiun‑Cheng Ko1,3* The accurate identifcation of biological control agents is necessary for monitoring and preventing contamination in integrated pest management (IPM); however, this is difcult for non‑taxonomists to achieve in the feld. Many machine learning techniques have been developed for multiple applications (e.g., identifcation of biological organisms). Some phytoseiids are biological control agents for small pests, such as Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes. To identify a precise biological control agent, a boosting machine learning classifcation, namely eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), was introduced in this study for the semi‑automated identifcation of phytoseiid mites. XGBoost analyses were based on 22 quantitative morphological features among 512 specimens of N. barkeri and related phytoseiid species. These features were extracted manually from photomicrograph of mites and included dorsal and ventrianal shield lengths, setal lengths, and length and width of spermatheca. The results revealed 100% accuracy rating, and seta j4 achieved signifcant discrimination among specimens. The present study provides a path through which skills and experiences can be transferred between experts and non‑experts. This can serve as a foundation for future studies on the automated identifcation of biological control agents for IPM. Integrated pest management (IPM) is applied in agricultural practices to concurrently minimise crop damage, environmental contamination, and economic loss 1,2. Biological control agents are crucial for IPM and agro- ecosystems. Regularly monitoring pests and biological control agents is necessary for IPM. Without accurate identifcation, the efciency of biological control cannot be monitored 2,3.
  • The Mite Taxa Created by S. Ehara and His Coauthors with Depositories of Their Type Series (Arachnida: Acari)

    The Mite Taxa Created by S. Ehara and His Coauthors with Depositories of Their Type Series (Arachnida: Acari)

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Tottori University Research Result Repository 鳥取県立博物館研究報告 Bulletin of the Tottori Prefectural Museum 46: 9-48, March 30, 2009 論文 Article The mite taxa created by S. Ehara and his coauthors with depositories of their type series (Arachnida: Acari) Shôzô EHARA1, Kazunori OHASHI2, Tetsuo GOTOH3 and Nobuo TSURUSAKI4 江原昭三と共著者によって創設されたダニ類のタクサ（分類群）および これらのタイプ・シリーズの保管施設（クモ形綱・ダニ目） 江原昭三１・大橋和典 2・後藤哲雄 3・鶴崎展巨 4 Abstract: The mite taxa (205 species, 4 genera, 1 subgenus, and 1 tribe) created by the late Dr. S. Ehara and his coauthors are listed here. The original names of the taxa are used but listed under each taxa is the new name (if it has changed), the type localities, habitats and depositories of each type series (along with Museum and accession number(s) of holotype and a part of paratypes). The full list of Ehara’s publications is also presented as well as his obituary. Key words: Arachnida, Acari, taxa, type series, depository, type locality, type habitat, obituary 要旨 : 江原昭三とその共著者によって創設されたダニ類タクサ（1 族，4 属，1 亜属，205 種）は多くの論文に分か れて発表されているので，これらのタクサをリストアップし，合わせてタイプ・シリーズの保管施設（博物館など） を記した。すなわち，原記載のままの学名，現在の和名（丸かっこ内），学名記載頁，図番号，タイプ産地とタイプ 生息地，タイプ・シリ－ズの保管施設名（ホロタイプのすべてと一部のパラタイプについては標本番号）を記録した。 ここで取り上げたタクサの一部は，こんにち変更されている場合があり，この場合には現行の学名が付記されている。 巻末には，江原昭三著作目録を掲げる。 The first author of this article, Shôzô Ehara has However, due to restoration work to the building of described a total of 1 tribe, 4 genera, 1 subgenus, and 205 the Faculty of Regional Sciences of Tottori University for species of mites (Arachnida: Acari) as new in his 119 solo enhancing earthquake safety, launched in July 2008, the and 86 joint articles since 1954.
  • Zootaxa,Species of the Subtribes Arrenoseiina And

    Zootaxa,Species of the Subtribes Arrenoseiina And

    Zootaxa 1448: 1–39 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Species of the subtribes Arrenoseiina and Proprioseiopsina (Tribe Amblyseiini) and the tribe Typhlodromipsini (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from sub-Saharan Africa GILBERTO J. DE MORAES1, IGNACE D. ZANNOU1, EDDIE A. UECKERMANN2, ANIBAL R. OLIVEIRA1, RACHID HANNA3 & JOHN S. YANINEK4 1Depto. Entomologia, Fitopatologia e Zoologia Agrícola, ESALQ-Universidade de São Paulo-13418-900 Piracicaba-SP, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] 2Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X134, Queenwood, Pretoria; 0121 South Africa 3Biological Control Centre for Africa, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, 08 B.P. 0932, Cotonou, Benin, West Africa 4Dept. Entomology, Smith Hall Room 100, 901 W State Street, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2089; USA Table of contents Abstract ...............................................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................2 Tribe Amblyseiini ................................................................................................................................................................3 Subtribe Arrenoseiina Chant & McMurtry .......................................................................................................................3
  • Download Vol. 5, No. 7

    Download Vol. 5, No. 7

    BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA STATE MUSEUM BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Volume 5 Number 7 SUBFAMILIES, GENERA, AND SPECIES OF PHYTOSEIIDAE (ACARINA: MESOSTIGMATA) Martin H. Muma 0/*3=11 \1811'> UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA Gainesville 1961 The numbers of THE BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA STATE MUSEUM, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, are published at irregular intervals. Volumes contain about 300 pages and are not necessarily completed in any one calendar year. WILLIAM J. RIEMER, Managing Editor OLIVER L. AUSTIN, JR., Editor , All communications concerning purchase or exchange of the publication should be addressed to the Curator of Biological Sciences, Florida State Museum, Seagle Building, Gainesville, Florida. Manuscripts should be sent to the Editor of the BULLETIN, Flint Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Published 9 May 1961 Price for this issue $0.50 SUBFAMILIES, GENERA, AND SPECIES OF PHYTOSEIIDAE (ACARINA: MESOSTIGMATA) MARTIN H. MuMA 1 SYNOPSIS: The subfamilies and genera of Phytoseiidae are re-evaluated on the basis of combined stable criteria of dorsal scutal form, dorsal scutal setation, scapular setation, sternal form, sternal setation and the macrosetae of leg IV. Four subfamilies are recognized, two of them new. Of the 43 genera diagnosed, 10 were Dreviously recognized, 8 previously synonymized, 1 i5 elevated from a subgenus, and 29 are new. Nine new species are described and figured. Alto- gether 187 speciesare cited. Many systematic studies have been conducted on this important family of predatory mites during the past 10 years. More than 180 species are now known, and the present high rate of species discovery indicates that this number may be doubled during the next decade.
  • (Acari) of Rubber Trees (Hevea Spp., Euphorbiaceae) in Brazil1

    (Acari) of Rubber Trees (Hevea Spp., Euphorbiaceae) in Brazil1

    Review about mites (Acari) of rubber trees (Hevea spp., Euphorbiaceae) in Brazil1 Fábio Akashi Hernandes2 & Reinaldo José Fazzio Feres3 Biota Neotropica v6 (n1) – http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v6n1/pt/abstract?article+bn00406012006 Date Received 06/15/2005 Revised 12/05/2005 Accepted 01/01/2006 1Part of Program BIOTA/FAPESP – Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade, http://www.biota.org.br 2Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Animal, Bolsista CNPq ([email protected]). 3Departamento de Zoologia e Botânica, Universidade Estadual Paulista. Rua Cristovao Colombo, 2265, Jardim Nazareth, 15054-000 São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil ([email protected]). Abstract Hernandes, F.A. and Feres, R.J.F. Review about mites (Acari) of rubber trees (Hevea spp., Euphorbiaceae) in Brazil. Biota Neotrop. Jan/Abr 2006, vol. 6, no. 1, http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v6n1/pt/abstract?article+bn00406012006. ISSN 1676-0611 Two of the most economically important superfamilies of phytophagous mites are Tetranychoidea and Eriophyoidea, which have species represented in rubber trees in Brazil. In this paper we review the literature concerning the mite fauna registered on rubber trees in that country. The source was the information available on literature, but also data from exploratory samplings in Goianésia, State of Goiás, and from a triennial survey with monthly samplings in Cedral, State of São Paulo. Among the phytophagous mites the most important and abundant species were Calacarus heveae and Tenuipalpus heveae. Seven of the nominal species reported belong to the family Tetranychidae. Eutetranychus banksi and Oligonychus gossypii were very numerous in several crops studied, although with no evident damage to the leaves caused by the former.
  • Sabyan Faris Honey Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture

    Sabyan Faris Honey Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture

    REVISION OF FAMILY PHYTOSEIIDAE (ACARI: MESOSTIGMATA) FROM PAKISTAN By Sabyan Faris Honey 2009-ag-1230 M.Sc. (Hons.) Entomology A Thesis submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ENTOMOLOGY Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan. 2016 i To The Controller of Examinations, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. We, the supervisory committee, certify that the contents and form of the thesis submitted by Sabyan Faris Honey, Regd. 2009-ag-1230 have been found satisfactory and recommend that it be processed for evaluation, by External Examiner (s) for the award of the degree. SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Chairman: ---------------------------------------- (Dr. Muhammad Hamid Bashir) Member: ---------------------------------------- (Dr. Bilal Saeed Khan) Member: ---------------------------------------- (Dr. Muhammad Shahid) i Declaration I hereby declare that the contents of the thesis, “Revision of family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Pakistan” are product of my own research and no part has been copied from any published source (except the references, standard mathematical and genetic models/ equations/ formulae/ protocols etc.). I further declare that this work has not been submitted for award of any other diploma/degree. The University may take action if the information provided is found inaccurate at any stage. (In case of any default the scholar will be proceeded against as per HEC plagiarism policy). (Sabyan Faris Honey) Reg. No. 2009-ag-1230 i Oh, Allah Almighty open our eyes, To see what is beautiful, Our minds to know what is true, Our heart to love what is Allah My Beloved Family Whose encouragement, spiritual inspiration, well wishes, sincere prayers and an atmosphere that initiate me to achieve high academic goals.
  • Phytoseiid Mites (Acari) Associated with Yerba Mate in Southern Brazil, with Description of a New Species

    Phytoseiid Mites (Acari) Associated with Yerba Mate in Southern Brazil, with Description of a New Species

    Zootaxa 3746 (2): 357–371 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3746.2.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9943C9D4-5F45-4AD3-9050-34E100D3F220 Phytoseiid mites (Acari) associated with yerba mate in southern Brazil, with description of a new species DINARTE GONÇALVES1, GUILHERME LIBERATO DA SILVA1 & NOELI JUAREZ FERLA2 1Departamento de Fitossanidade, Faculdade de Agronomia "Eliseu Maciel," FAEM-UFPel, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Capão do Leão, 96001-970, RS, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2Laboratório de Acarologia, Museu de Ciências Naturais, UNIVATES - Centro Universitário, 95900-000 Lajeado, RS, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Yerba mate is a plant of great socioeconomic importance in southern South America. Little has been published about the phytoseiid mite fauna of yerba mate. This paper presents information about the morphology and distribution of phytoseiid mites collected in yerba mate in the Ilópolis and Putinga counties of Brazil between 2002 and 2004. Four areas with of different forms of cultivation in every county were sampled. A list of the species recorded from that state, and a key for their identification are provided. Sixteen phytoseiid mites species were identified, belonging to 11 genera in the subfam- ilies Amblyseiinae (13 species) and Typhlodrominae (three species). The most abundant genus was Amblyseius with three species. Phytoscutus sexpilis Muma, 1961 and Typhloseiopsis dorsoreticulatus Lofego, Demite & Feres, 2011 are reported for the first time from Rio Grande do Sul state. This study also includes the description of a new species, Typhlodromips pallinii n.
  • Thèse Comlpète Pour 14 Décembre

    Thèse Comlpète Pour 14 Décembre

    MINISTÈRE DE L’ALIMENTATION DE L’AGRICULTURE ET DE LA PÊCHE MONTPELLIER SUPAGRO THÈSE présentée à Montpellier SupAgro pour obtenir le diplôme de Doctorat Formation doctorale : Évolution, Écologie, Ressources génétiques, Paléontologie École doctorale : Systèmes Intégrés en Biologie, Agronomie, Géosciences, Hydrosciences, Environnement Laboratoire d’accueil : Unité Mixte de Recherche Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations INRA / IRD / CIRAD / Montpellier SupAgro Campus International de Baillarguet, CS 30016 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France Etudes taxonomiques de deux genres d’acariens prédateurs de la famille des Phytoseiidae (Acari : Mesostigmata) : Phytoseiulus Evans et Neoseiulella Muma Présentée et soutenue publiquement par MOHAMAD KANOUH le 14 Décembre 2010 JURY Serge KREITER Montpellier SupAgro Co-directeur de thèse Mark JUDSON Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris Examinateur Jean-Pierre LUMARET Université de Montpellier III Examinateur André NEL Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris Rapporteur Jean-Loup NOTTEGHEM Montpellier SupAgro Examinateur Salvatore RAGUSA Université degli Studi de Palermo, Italie Rapporteur Marie-Stéphane TIXIER Montpellier SupAgro Co-directrice de thèse RÉSUMÉ La classification actuelle de la famille des Phytoseiidae n’est pas basée sur de réelles études phylogénétiques et par conséquent, de nombreuses questions se posent sur la validité des taxa supra-spécifiques mais également vis-à-vis des taxa spécifiques. Ce travail de thèse avait donc pour objectif de répondre à de telles questions pour deux genres : Phytoseiulus et Neoseiulella, en utilisant pour la première fois des approches phylogénétiques moléculaires et morphologiques. Ces études phylogénétiques ont été également associées à des études biogéographiques. Les résultats obtenus par ces deux approches sont congruents et semblent montrer que ces deux genres ne sont pas monophylétiques : le genre Phytoseiulus semble au mieux paraphylétique, tandis que le genre Neoseiulella serait polyphylétique.