DOCSLIB.ORG

House of Commons Annual Report and Accounts 2017-18

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
House of Commons Annual Report and Accounts 2017-18 Annual Report and Accounts 2017–18 1 Annual Report and Accounts 2017– 18 The HOUSE of COMMONS: Administration Annual Report and Accounts 2017–18 (for the year ended 31 March 2018) Presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 1(3) of the House of Commons (Administration) Act 1978 and section 3 (as amended) of the House of Commons (Administration) Act 1978 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 23 July 2018 Published by Authority of the House of Commons HC 1381 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright . Performance Report 01 p6 Accountability Report 02. p44 Financial Statements 03. p88 Annual Report of the Administration Estimate Audit . and Risk Assurance Committee 04 p120 Annual Report and Accounts 2017–18 Performance Report 6 0 1 Performance Report Overview 8 Performance Analysis 18 © UK Parliament/Mark Duffy Annual Report and Accounts 2017–18 Performance Report 8 Performance Report Overview Foreword by the Clerk of the House The new Parliament had just begun when there was an attempted cyber-attack on our computer network. On The past 12 months have been particularly challenging 23 June 2017, the Digital Service discovered unusual for the House Service. During this time, several of the activity and closer investigation confirmed that hackers risks we had identified have materialised. We have were carrying out a sustained and determined cyber- addressed the consequences and sought to learn attack in an attempt to identify weak passwords and lessons from these events. This should help us to gain access to users emails. Significantly fewer than 1% mitigate risks in future and to better prepare ourselves of the 9,000 accounts on the parliamentary network to deal with handling similar incidents. I am delighted were compromised as a result of weak passwords. but not surprised that staff responded so effectively, This successful defence from a cyber-attack has been and that our overall level of performance has been enabled by the actions taken in the past few years maintained but there is still room for improvement in within the Cyber Security Programme. An independent the way we deliver our services. review reported positively that Parliament’s cyber On 22 March 2017, Westminster was the target security capability had significantly improved compared of a terrorist attack which resulted in the death of with three years before. The review also identified some five members of the public, and of PC Keith Palmer areas for improvement. within the Parliamentary Estate. On that day, and the In the autumn, following a number of allegations of days that followed, staff across the House Service bullying and harassment, including sexual harassment, showed their professionalism, calmness and courage. concerning Members and Members’ staff, the cross- Following the attack, the Speakers of the two Houses party Working Group on an Independent Complaints commissioned an external independent review of how and Grievance Policy was established to tackle the perimeter of the Parliamentary Estate is secured these issues. In February the House endorsed the and protected. The recommendations of the review are recommendations of the Working Group, since when being implemented, with many being achieved through work which includes the establishment of a Behaviour a Security Programme which has been prioritised. In Code for Parliament, an independent complaints and addition, the operation during and after the attack of grievance scheme to underpin the Code, and a system Parliament’s Incident Management Framework was of training to support the Code, has been ongoing and externally reviewed and action has been taken to is reporting regularly to a steering group of Members. implement the recommendations. The House of Commons Commission established an The announcement of a snap General Election in April Independent Inquiry into the bullying of House staff, 2017 came as a surprise, and managing the impact of following the testimony on the BBC’s Newsnight the election, with little preparation or planning time, programme of some of our own serving or retired staff. was a substantial challenge. This challenge was met by I am determined that we will learn from where things all parts of the House Service, who responded to it with have gone wrong in the past to make the House a enthusiasm, working together to deliver a good start workplace that is free of bullying and harassment, and to the new Parliament for new and returning Members where all are treated with dignity and respect. alike. In particular, the New Members’ Reception Area, I am naturally disappointed that for the seventh which operated in the first week after the election, successive year, the Head of Internal Audit has only demonstrated what can be achieved by colleagues been able to offer a limited opinion in relation to the across the House working together to deliver the best level of assurance. This is due to the acknowledged possible service to our Members. All staff involved continuing weaknesses in the governance, risk in delivering the post-election service, in whatever management, and control framework, which impairs capacity, should be rightly proud of their achievements. Performance Report Annual Report and Accounts 2017–18 9 The past 12 months have been particularly challenging for the House Service ... Thanks to the efforts of staff ... our overall level of performance has been maintained. our effectiveness and has understandably led to this opinion. I note that this year it was a marginal decision that resulted in a limited opinion, which recognises that there are signs of improvement. However, more progress has to be made, and all staff are striving to make the cultural changes we have asked of them. As these embed in the coming year, our aim is to achieve a moderate opinion next year. The events I have described above have attracted a lot of attention over the past year, but it is important to reiterate that, thanks to the efforts of staff, often in challenging circumstances, business as usual activity has continued and the House’s decision-making processes have operated effectively. New and returning Members have been able to set up their offices and perform their duties, and throughout the year, Members have been ably supported in their role by the existing services of the House. The focus of House business this year has been the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union. The Research and Information Team have compiled research briefings and obtained up-to-date material to inform debate on the very broad range of topics that are affected by Brexit, while Select Committees have held numerous inquiries and published reports on the impact of Brexit in their subject areas. This authoritative information has also been made available to the public via the UK Parliament website. The EU (Withdrawal) Act has been appropriately dealt with by Parliament, which has required much expertise from our Chamber Team and other teams. This is not the end of the Brexit process; our main task for the year ahead is to provide ongoing support to the House and its Members as the process continues. Sir David Natzler KCB, Clerk of the House, House of Commons Annual Report and Accounts 2017–18 Performance Report 10 © UK Parliament/Mark Duffy © UK Parliament/Mark The changes we have put in place this year ... will improve how we deliver services in years to come. Performance Report Annual Report and Accounts 2017–18 11 Introduction by the Director General to set up a Sponsor Board and Delivery Authority, Over the past year we as a House Service have faced initially in shadow form, before the necessary legislation many pressures in delivering our mission of supporting is enacted. This presents further challenges for our a thriving parliamentary democracy. As an organisation governance, making it essential that we increase the we have had to start recovering from the five terrorist pace of improvement to our framework of governance, attacks which hit the UK in 2017, including the risk management and control. Westminster attack in March, and rethink how we In addition to Restoration and Renewal, our staff are protect those on our Estate. This year our staff have also undertaking several projects to maintain the Palace of supported Parliament during the snap General Election, Westminster before it is possible to decant. We have dealt with a sustained cyber-attack and subsequent made much progress on the renovation of Elizabeth reprioritisation, and begun enacting the decision by Tower, one of the UK’s most famous landmarks, and both Houses on the Restoration and Renewal of the with the conservation of Westminster Hall, the oldest Palace of Westminster. More recently the issues raised in part of the Parliamentary Estate. There are many relation to bullying and harassment have highlighted the improvements that can be made to the Estate, but given importance of our commitment to providing a working both the limited capacity to deliver a large number environment that is fair to all and where everyone is of capital projects at one time, and a world in which treated with respect and dignity. Meanwhile, throughout Parliament has over a million visitors a year, it has been the year, we have also been addressing the recognised decided that only those projects which improve security, weaknesses in our management and governance fire safety or health and safety should proceed. processes, which inhibit our effectiveness. The performance of our staff has had to meet these During 2017–18 we placed a particular emphasis on our challenges as they arose over the year. The House Service customers, our staff and the ways in which we work.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 17 River Prospect: Golden Jubilee/ Hungerford Footbridges
    17 River Prospect: Golden Jubilee/ 149 Hungerford Footbridges 285 The Golden Jubilee/Hungerford Footbridges flank the Hungerford railway bridge, built in 1863. The footbridges were designed by the architects Lifschutz Davidson and were opened as a Millennium Project in 2003. 286 There are two Viewing Locations at Golden Jubilee/Hungerford Footbridges, 17A and 17B, referring to the upstream and downstream sides of the bridge. 150 London View Management Framework Viewing Location 17A Golden Jubilee/Hungerford Footbridges: upstream N.B for key to symbols refer to image 1 Panorama from Assessment Point 17A.1 Golden Jubilee/Hungerford Footbridges: upstream - close to the Lambeth bank Panorama from Assessment Point 17A.2 Golden Jubilee/Hungerford Footbridges: upstream - close to the Westminster bank 17 River Prospect: Golden Jubilee/Hungerford Footbridges 151 Description of the View 287 Two Assessment Points are located on the upstream side of Landmarks include: the bridge (17A.1 and 17A.2) representing the wide swathe Palace of Westminster (I) † of views available. A Protected Silhouette of the Palace of Towers of Westminster Abbey (I) Westminster is applied between Assessment Points 17A.1 The London Eye and 17A.2. Westminster Bridge (II*) Whitehall Court (II*) 288 The river dominates the foreground. In the middle ground the London Eye and Embankment trees form distinctive Also in the views: elements. The visible buildings on Victoria Embankment The Shell Centre comprise a broad curve of large, formal elements of County Hall (II*) consistent height and scale, mostly of Portland stone. St Thomas’s Hospital (Victorian They form a strong and harmonious building line. section) (II) St George’s Wharf, Vauxhall 289 The Palace of Westminster, part of the World Heritage Site, Millbank Tower (II) terminates the view, along with the listed Millbank Tower.
    [Show full text]
  • Patient Health Records: Access, Sharing and Confidentiality
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 07103, 14 April 2020 Patient health records: By Elizabeth Parkin, Philip access, sharing and Loft confidentiality Inside: 1. Accessing and sharing patient health records 2. Sharing confidential patient information 3. Electronic health records 4. NHS data and cyber security 5. Patient Data, Apps and Artificial Intelligence (AI) 6. Cross-border data sharing after Brexit www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 07103, 14 April 2020 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Accessing and sharing patient health records 4 1.1 Charges to access records 5 1.2 Limiting access to health records 6 1.3 Parental access to child health records 6 1.4 Access to deceased patients’ health records 7 2. Sharing confidential patient information 9 2.1 Patient confidentiality and Covid-19 9 2.2 NHS Constitution and policy background 13 2.3 NHS Digital guidance on confidentiality 14 2.4 National Data Guardian for health and care 14 Caldicott principles 15 2.5 National Data Guardian for health and care: priorities for 2019/20 16 2.6 National data opt-out programme 17 2.7 Legal and statutory disclosures of information 18 2.8 Disclosure of NHS data to the Home Office 19 2.9 Public interest disclosures of patient information 20 2.10 Deceased patients 21 2.11 Assessment of capacity to give or withhold consent 23 2.12 Private companies contracted to provide NHS services 24 3. Electronic health records 25 3.1 NHS ‘paper-free’ by 2023 25 3.2 Summary Care Records 27 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Buildings by Richard Kelly
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8568, 16 May 2019 Parliamentary Buildings By Richard Kelly (Restoration and Renewal) Bill 2017-19 Contents: 1. Restoration and Renewal 2. Progress so far 3. Pre-legislative scrutiny of the draft Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill 4. The Bill 5. Northern Estate Programme www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill 2017-19 Contents Summary 3 The Bill 3 Background 3 Northern Estate Programme 4 1. Restoration and Renewal 6 2. Progress so far 8 2.1 Identifying the extent of the problem and developing proposals 8 2.2 Joint Committee review of options 8 2.3 Parliament agrees with the Joint Committee’s recommendations 10 2.4 The debate in the Commons 11 2.5 Subsequent developments 13 3. Pre-legislative scrutiny of the draft Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill 14 3.1 Looking forward to the draft bill 14 3.2 Publication of the draft bill 14 3.3 Joint Committee to scrutinise the draft bill 15 3.4 Pre-legislative scrutiny 16 Powers and duties of the Sponsor Body 16 4. The Bill 23 4.1 Introduction 23 4.2 The “Parliamentary building works” – clause 1 24 4.3 The Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body – clause 2 24 Schedule 1 26 4.4 The Delivery Authority – clause 3 27 Schedule 2 28 4.5 Relationship between the Sponsor Body and Parliament – clause 6 29 4.6 Parliamentary approval for works and funding – clause 7 29 4.7 Parliamentary Works Estimate Commission – clause 8 30 Schedule 3 30 4.8 Funding – clause 9 30 Schedule 4 30 4.9 Abolition and dissolution of the statutory bodies – clauses 10 and 11 31 4.10 Commencement – clause 14 32 4.11 Remaining clauses 33 5.
    [Show full text]
  • United Kingdom Youth Parliament Debate 11Th November 2016 House of Commons
    United Kingdom Youth Parliament Debate 11th November 2016 House of Commons 1 Youth Parliament11 NOVEMBER 2016 Youth Parliament 2 we get into our formal proceedings. Let us hope that Youth Parliament it is a great day. We now have a countdown of just over 40 seconds. I have already spotted a parliamentary colleague Friday 11 November 2016 here, Christina Rees, the hon. Member for Neath, whose parliamentary assistant will be addressing the Chamber erelong. Christina, welcome to you. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] 11 am 10.54 am The Youth Parliament observed a two-minute silence. Mr Speaker: Welcome to the eighth sitting of the UK Thank you, colleagues. I call the Leader of the House [Applause.] Youth Parliament in the House of Commons Chamber. of Commons, Mr David Lidington. This marks the beginning of UK Parliament Week, a programme of events and activities which connects The Leader of the House of Commons (Mr David people with the United Kingdom Parliament. This year, Lidington): I thank you, Mr Speaker, and Members of more than 250 activities and events are taking place the YouthParliament. I think you and I would probably across the UK. The issues to be debated today were agree that the initial greetings we have received make a chosen by the annual Make Your Mark ballot of 11 to welcome contrast from the reception we may, at times, 18-year-olds. The British Youth Council reported that, get from our colleagues here during normal working once again, the number of votes has increased, with sessions. 978,216 young people casting a vote this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Compensation for Members of Parliament 2007
    Where are we? Who can I contact? The Quick Guide 2007 We are located on the third floor, 7 Millbank. Salaries, Allowances etc. for Members of Parliament The address is: Enquiries and Advice Department of Finance and Administration 020 7219 1340 House of Commons e-mail [email protected] London SW1A 0AA Horse Guards Road Victoria Embankment Personnel Advice Service 1 King Charles Street Derby Gate Parliament Street Advice on personnel or employment practice 2 3 020 7219 2080 e-mail [email protected] 4 5 Great George Street Westminster Bridge Centrally Provided Computer Equipment Storey’s Gate PICT Service Desk on 020 7219 2001 Department of Finance and Administration Parliament Houses of Training for Members’ staff Parliament River Square Thames Bookings WWP Training Ltd on 0870 606 0088 St. Margaret’s Street www.w4mp.org Broad Sanctuary Westminster Abby Great Smith Street Members’ Pensions 020 7219 4962 Occupational Health, Safety & Welfare Service Great College Street Office Manager 020 7219 1484 Great Peter Street Marsham Street Occupational Health Physician Sq th u Millbank i a 6 m r e S 020 7219 4782 1 Norman Shaw North Practice Nurse 020 7219 5103 2 Norman Shaw South 3 1 Derby Gate Horseferry Road Lambeth Bridge 4 1 Parliament Street Emergencies 5 Portcullis House Security Control 3333 April 2007 6 7 Millbank Salaries & Allowances April 2007 Travel Other Allowances Member’s Salary from 1 April 2007 £60,675 per year Select Committee Chairman’s Salary Travel for Members In addition, Members are entitled to: from 1 April
    [Show full text]
  • Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States
    The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States Updated April 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33105 SUMMARY RL33105 The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and April 16, 2021 Relations with the United States Derek E. Mix Many U.S. officials and Members of Congress view the United Kingdom (UK) as the United Specialist in European States’ closest and most reliable ally. This perception stems from a combination of factors, Affairs including a sense of shared history, values, and culture; a large and mutually beneficial economic relationship; and extensive cooperation on foreign policy and security issues. The UK’s January 2020 withdrawal from the European Union (EU), often referred to as Brexit, is likely to change its international role and outlook in ways that affect U.S.-UK relations. Conservative Party Leads UK Government The government of the UK is led by Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the Conservative Party. Brexit has dominated UK domestic politics since the 2016 referendum on whether to leave the EU. In an early election held in December 2019—called in order to break a political deadlock over how and when the UK would exit the EU—the Conservative Party secured a sizeable parliamentary majority, winning 365 seats in the 650-seat House of Commons. The election results paved the way for Parliament’s approval of a withdrawal agreement negotiated between Johnson’s government and the EU. UK Is Out of the EU, Concludes Trade and Cooperation Agreement On January 31, 2020, the UK’s 47-year EU membership came to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaping in Workplaces and Public Places November 2018
    The All-Party Parliamentary Group for Vaping Vaping in workplaces and public places November 2018 Contents 3 Introduction 4 Recommendations 5 Existing vaping policies 6 The importance of vaping policies 7 Responsible vaping 8 Vaping in Parliament 8 Second hand vapour: the evidence 9 Appendix 1: sample workplace vaping policy 10 Appendix 2: Parliamentary Estate vaping policy 11 References Disclaimer This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its committees. All-Party Groups are informal groups of Members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The facts presented, and views expressed in this report are those of the APPG members. 2 Mark Pawsey MP Chairman of the APPG for Vaping Introduction As an introduction to this topic, it is important to highlight that There was also a sense in the evidence we gathered that vaping is not smoking, nor are vapers the same as smokers. many employers and public places simply had not considered Vaping has its own behavioural characteristics and crucially, it vaping and vapers as a separate category to smoking or is not subject to legislation prohibiting smoking indoors or in had not considered vaping at all. There was a clear lack of certain locations. Public Health England has also published understanding about vaping behaviour; for example knowing clear guidance that vaping and smoking must be considered that vapers use their devices in frequent small doses separately. throughout the day rather than a single significant dose from a cigarette.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Youth Parliament 2017 Long; Theodora Manassieva; Andrew Powell; Douglas Pyper; Nerys Roberts; Tom Rutherford
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8110 17th October 2017 By Sarah Barber; Alex Bate Louise Butcher; Hannah Cromerty; Rachael Harker; Lydia Jackson; Neil Johnston; Robert UK Youth Parliament 2017 Long; Theodora Manassieva; Andrew Powell; Douglas Pyper; Nerys Roberts; Tom Rutherford Contents: Background A curriculum to prepare us for life Votes at 16 Protect LGBT + People Support for young carers Transport First Aid education for all young people Mental Health Make the invisible visible Protect school budgets from damaging cuts Work experience hubs for 11-18 year olds www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 UK Youth Parliament 2017 Contents Background 4 A curriculum to prepare us for life 6 1.1 Personal, social, health and economic education (PSHE) 6 PSHE Association 7 Statutory PSHE? 7 Education Committee report and recommendation for statutory PSHE 8 Joint letter from select committee Chairs 9 Women and Equalities Committee scrutiny and recommendation 10 1.2 Sex and relationship education (SRE) 10 Current position 10 Reform: statutory Relationships and Sex Education 11 1.3 Citizenship education 12 1.4 Further Reading 13 Votes at 16 14 2.1 Who supports lowering the voting age to 16? 15 2.2 How many 16 and 17 year olds are there in the UK? 16 2.3 What would the impact of letting 16 and 17 year olds vote? 17 2.4 What has happened in Scotland? 17 2.5 The lowering of the voting age in Wales? 19 2.6 Recent debates in Parliament 19 2.7 Other countries 22 2.8 Further reading 23
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Conventions
    REPORT Parliamentary Conventions Jacqy Sharpe About the Author Jacqy Sharpe is a former Clerk in the House of Commons. Her period as Clerk of the Journals provided her with significant insight into the historical and contemporary context of parliamentary conventions and procedure. Message from the Author With thanks to Dr Andrew Blick, Sir David Beamish, Helen Irwin and Sir Malcolm Jack for their comments on drafts of this paper. The conclusions, and any errors or omissions, are, of course, the responsibility of the author. Parliamentary Conventions Executive Summary “General agreement or consent, as embodied in any accepted usage, standard, etc”1 “Rules of constitutional practice that are regarded as binding in operation, but not in law”2 “[B]inding rules of behaviour accepted by those at whom they are directed. A practice that is not invariable does not qualify.”3 A list of various conventions with a note on how, if at all, they, or the approaches to them, have lately been modified or changed: CONVENTION CURRENT POSITION Conventions relating to behaviour in the House of Commons Speaking in the House of Commons Members should address the House through the Chair Although both questioned and frequently breached, and refer to other Members in the third person, by the convention is generally accepted constituency or position. Except for opening speeches, maiden speeches and Accepted and generally observed where there is special reason for precision, Members should not read speeches, though they may refer to notes Attendance at debates Members
    [Show full text]
  • Siebert, S. (2020) Restoration and Renewal of Parliament: Buildings As a Vehicle for Change
    Siebert, S. (2020) Restoration and Renewal of Parliament: Buildings as a Vehicle for Change. Project Report. University of Glasgow. doi: 10.36399/gla.pubs.223191. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/223191/1/223191.pdf Deposited on: 11 September 2020 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk Research Report Restoration and Renewal of Parliament: Buildings as a vehicle for change Sabina Siebert Professor of Management University of Glasgow [email protected] February 2020 INTRODUCTION This report summarises the findings from my 13-month POST Academic Fellowship of “The Parliament and Westminster Palace: The role of buildings in the preservation of institutional traditions, symbols and customs” funded by the ESRC Impact Acceleration Account (ES/M500471). The project started in April 2018 and the data collection was completed in May 2019. This project aimed to explore the links between the institution of the Westminster Parliament and the buildings in which it is located. The main research questions were: To what extent are the workings of Parliament as an institution intertwined with the buildings and their current design? Would altering the buildings change the existing practices? I present the findings from my research under three headings: (1) Buildings as a resource; (2) Buildings as a constraint; and (3) Buildings as a vehicle for change. Investigating the role of the buildings in preserving the workings, traditions and customs of Parliament is particularly timely given the ongoing discussions related to the Restoration and Renewal (R&R) project and the planned move of Parliament to a temporary location.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Artist's Depiction of the City and Its Gardens 1745-1756
    Durham E-Theses Public and private space in Canaletto's London: An examination of the artist's depiction of the city and its gardens 1745-1756 Hudson, Ferne Olivia How to cite: Hudson, Ferne Olivia (2000) Public and private space in Canaletto's London: An examination of the artist's depiction of the city and its gardens 1745-1756, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4252/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Public and Private Space in Canaletto's London. An Examination of the Artist's Depiction of the City and its Gardens 1745-1756. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published in any form, including Electronic and the Internet, without the author's prior written consent.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources for Your UK Parliament Week
    Houses of Parliament Resources for your UK Parliament Week Primary pack www.ukparliamentweek.org Teachers Resource Booklet | UK Parliament Week 1 Welcome to your pack of primary school resources for UK Parliament Week containing a range of activities and lesson ideas for exploring citizenship, democracy and parliamentary heritage. Many of the ideas fall into the PSHE, PDMU, SMSC, Skills for Life or Citizenship curricula areas, others also cover Art, Design, History and assemblies. The ideas are especially suitable for UK Parliament Week in November, but can also be used at any time throughout the year. You can find out more about UK Parliament Week and how your school can become involved at www.ukparliamentweek. org. We’d love to hear about your projects. How to use this pack The ideas are designed to be lexible and adaptable to the different cur- ricula, syllabuses and schooling patterns of the national regions. For this reason we have not tied individual lessons plans to speciic curriculum goals; instead we have sought to provide resources that you can pick up and use or look to for inspiration. Broad age range guidance is given but there is lexibility here too. As ever, we believe that teachers are best placed to un- derstand their students’ needs and to develop appropriate material. Stickers We have provided a selection of stickers for you to use as inspiration and rewards. 2 Teachers Resource Booklet | UK Parliament Week www.ukparliamentweek.org Teachers Resource Booklet | UK Parliament Week 3 Contents Assemblies 6 Quiz 8 Debating 10 School councils 18 Ballot box 19 Colouring in 22 Assemblies Assemblies It’s not fair! Who was Simon de Montfort? Suitable for: Whole School Suitable for: Best for older primary and middle school students Aim: To explore the idea of fairness,the bedrock of democracy Aim: To tell the story of Simon de Montfort and relate this to modern democracy How long: 10-15mins How long: video 7.10mins, other material 5.10minutes Tip! Host the assembly in four steps: This material can also be used in class in a History context.
    [Show full text]