Engagement, Education & Outreach Handbook for Commonwealth Parliaments
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Liaison Committee
Liaison Committee House of Commons London SW1A 0AA Tel: 020 7219 5675 Email: [email protected] Website: https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/103/liaison-committee-commons From Sir Bernard Jenkin MP, Chair Rt Hon Jacob Rees-Mogg MP Leader of the House House of Commons London SW1A 0AA 17 February 2021 Dear Jacob, In anticipation of the announcement of the end of the current Parliamentary Session, I am writing on behalf of Select Committee Chairs to highlight a number of pieces of legislation which are awaiting time in the Government’s legislative programme. The Government’s legislative programme has been understandably impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic, but there are a number of outstanding proposals which Committees are keen to see brought forward or where further action or information is required: • Passing the Environment Bill should be a Government priority, given the gap that now exists in environmental governance following the end of the transition period. Provisions in the Bill respond to recommendations the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee and the Environmental Audit Committee have made across a range of inquiries in recent years. Both Committees conducted pre-legislative scrutiny of the first part of the Bill in 2019 and have continued to monitor its progress during the current Session. • The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee have also conducted pre-legislative scrutiny on the Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Bill, which increases sentences for some animal cruelty offences. This Bill will implement recommendations from the Committee dating back to 2016. The Committee completed pre-legislative scrutiny on the relevant provisions in 2018 but the Bill has yet to complete passage through the House. -
United Kingdom Youth Parliament Debate 11Th November 2016 House of Commons
United Kingdom Youth Parliament Debate 11th November 2016 House of Commons 1 Youth Parliament11 NOVEMBER 2016 Youth Parliament 2 we get into our formal proceedings. Let us hope that Youth Parliament it is a great day. We now have a countdown of just over 40 seconds. I have already spotted a parliamentary colleague Friday 11 November 2016 here, Christina Rees, the hon. Member for Neath, whose parliamentary assistant will be addressing the Chamber erelong. Christina, welcome to you. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] 11 am 10.54 am The Youth Parliament observed a two-minute silence. Mr Speaker: Welcome to the eighth sitting of the UK Thank you, colleagues. I call the Leader of the House [Applause.] Youth Parliament in the House of Commons Chamber. of Commons, Mr David Lidington. This marks the beginning of UK Parliament Week, a programme of events and activities which connects The Leader of the House of Commons (Mr David people with the United Kingdom Parliament. This year, Lidington): I thank you, Mr Speaker, and Members of more than 250 activities and events are taking place the YouthParliament. I think you and I would probably across the UK. The issues to be debated today were agree that the initial greetings we have received make a chosen by the annual Make Your Mark ballot of 11 to welcome contrast from the reception we may, at times, 18-year-olds. The British Youth Council reported that, get from our colleagues here during normal working once again, the number of votes has increased, with sessions. 978,216 young people casting a vote this year. -
United Kingdom House of Commons Received on 7 Jan 2020
Written evidence from UK House of Commons on its petitioning system Background I am pleased to contribute to the Standing Committee’s inquiry into its environment and petitions functions. This evidence covers the traditional public (paper) petitioning system and the e-petitioning system which has been operated jointly by the UK Government and House of Commons since 2015 and is overseen by the House of Commons Petitions Committee. Public petitions Paper Petitions - History The right of the subject to petition the Monarch for redress of personal grievances has a long history, having been recognised in the Magna Carta and restated in the Bill of Rights 1689. The first known petitions to the Lords and to both Houses of Parliament date from the reign of Richard II (1377 to 1399) but the practice seems to have become more widespread from the reign of Henry IV (1399 to 1413) onwards. During the 16th and early parts of the 17th centuries, petitions relating to issues of public policy became increasingly popular. As petitions during this time were taken before the start of debates, they were often used as a way of obstructing business. A Select Committee in 1832 was established to tackle this problem and the House agreed to introduce more stringent rules via standing orders. In 1912-13 there were 10,221 petitions presented, this however fell dramatically in 1919 to 121. In 1939-40 only one petition was presented to the House. In more recent times, the 2016-17 session saw 328 petitions presented, of which 296 were formally presented on the floor of the House of Commons. -
UK Youth Parliament 2017 Long; Theodora Manassieva; Andrew Powell; Douglas Pyper; Nerys Roberts; Tom Rutherford
BRIEFING PAPER Number 8110 17th October 2017 By Sarah Barber; Alex Bate Louise Butcher; Hannah Cromerty; Rachael Harker; Lydia Jackson; Neil Johnston; Robert UK Youth Parliament 2017 Long; Theodora Manassieva; Andrew Powell; Douglas Pyper; Nerys Roberts; Tom Rutherford Contents: Background A curriculum to prepare us for life Votes at 16 Protect LGBT + People Support for young carers Transport First Aid education for all young people Mental Health Make the invisible visible Protect school budgets from damaging cuts Work experience hubs for 11-18 year olds www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 UK Youth Parliament 2017 Contents Background 4 A curriculum to prepare us for life 6 1.1 Personal, social, health and economic education (PSHE) 6 PSHE Association 7 Statutory PSHE? 7 Education Committee report and recommendation for statutory PSHE 8 Joint letter from select committee Chairs 9 Women and Equalities Committee scrutiny and recommendation 10 1.2 Sex and relationship education (SRE) 10 Current position 10 Reform: statutory Relationships and Sex Education 11 1.3 Citizenship education 12 1.4 Further Reading 13 Votes at 16 14 2.1 Who supports lowering the voting age to 16? 15 2.2 How many 16 and 17 year olds are there in the UK? 16 2.3 What would the impact of letting 16 and 17 year olds vote? 17 2.4 What has happened in Scotland? 17 2.5 The lowering of the voting age in Wales? 19 2.6 Recent debates in Parliament 19 2.7 Other countries 22 2.8 Further reading 23 -
Resources for Your UK Parliament Week
Houses of Parliament Resources for your UK Parliament Week Primary pack www.ukparliamentweek.org Teachers Resource Booklet | UK Parliament Week 1 Welcome to your pack of primary school resources for UK Parliament Week containing a range of activities and lesson ideas for exploring citizenship, democracy and parliamentary heritage. Many of the ideas fall into the PSHE, PDMU, SMSC, Skills for Life or Citizenship curricula areas, others also cover Art, Design, History and assemblies. The ideas are especially suitable for UK Parliament Week in November, but can also be used at any time throughout the year. You can find out more about UK Parliament Week and how your school can become involved at www.ukparliamentweek. org. We’d love to hear about your projects. How to use this pack The ideas are designed to be lexible and adaptable to the different cur- ricula, syllabuses and schooling patterns of the national regions. For this reason we have not tied individual lessons plans to speciic curriculum goals; instead we have sought to provide resources that you can pick up and use or look to for inspiration. Broad age range guidance is given but there is lexibility here too. As ever, we believe that teachers are best placed to un- derstand their students’ needs and to develop appropriate material. Stickers We have provided a selection of stickers for you to use as inspiration and rewards. 2 Teachers Resource Booklet | UK Parliament Week www.ukparliamentweek.org Teachers Resource Booklet | UK Parliament Week 3 Contents Assemblies 6 Quiz 8 Debating 10 School councils 18 Ballot box 19 Colouring in 22 Assemblies Assemblies It’s not fair! Who was Simon de Montfort? Suitable for: Whole School Suitable for: Best for older primary and middle school students Aim: To explore the idea of fairness,the bedrock of democracy Aim: To tell the story of Simon de Montfort and relate this to modern democracy How long: 10-15mins How long: video 7.10mins, other material 5.10minutes Tip! Host the assembly in four steps: This material can also be used in class in a History context. -
Westminster Seminar on Effective Parliaments 2019
Westminster Seminar on Effective Parliaments 2019 UK SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES PARLIAMENTARIANS PROGRAMME SESSION 2: DIVERSITY WITHIN PARLIAMENT BARONESS LIZ BARKER MONDAY 25 NOVEMBER Baroness Barker has been a Liberal Democrat Peer since 1999. She has been a spokesperson on pensions and health, charities and social en- SESSION 1: EFFECTIVE PARLIAMENTS AND OUR ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES terprise, and LGBT rights. She is Vice-Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Global LGBTI Rights, HIV/AIDS, APPG on Sexual and Reproductive Health. She is a member of APPGs on Nigeria and India. A supporter of Open for Business, Liz is the CEO of ThirdSectorBusiness, a consultancy DAME MARGARET HODGE which specialises in charities and social enterprise. She advises parliamen- tarians, companies and NGOs around the world on how to work together to Margaret became the Labour Member of Parliament for Barking in June accelerate change. Justice for minorities, equality for women and girls, and 1994. She has served in government, holding portfolios across education, respect for older people are the themes which recur through Liz’s work. She work and pensions, business and culture. In 2010, Margaret also became is currently leading work in parliament on trans, non-binary and intersex le- the first elected Chair of the Public Accounts Committee and was also its gal recognition and celebrating equality developments in Northern Ireland. first female Chair. Today, Margaret is the Chair of the APPG on Responsible Tax, as well as the Chair for organisations in the arts and higher education. PIPPA PATTERSON Pippa Patterson is the Clerk of the House of Lords EU Home Affairs Com- mittee, which scrutinises the UK Government’s approach to EU policy on immigration, asylum, police and security cooperation, healthcare, sport and PROFESSOR PHILIP NORTON education. -
1–7 NOV 2020 Ukparliamentweek.Org the Girlguiding Laser Edition
1–7 NOV 2020 ukparliamentweek.org the girlguiding laser edition #UKPW This year we mark ten years of UK Parliament Week! Each year it has grown and grown. Last year was the biggest yet. 11,800 activities took place, and over 1.2 million people got hands on with democracy. Activities took place in every one of the 650 constituencies across England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales, and in 47 other countries around the world too! This UK Parliament Week we are looking ahead to the next ten years. What issues are important to the groups you work with? What changes do they want to see over the next ten years? How can they work with UK Parliament to make it happen? Your UK Parliament Week kit is full of the tools, ideas and inspiration you’ll need to learn about how the UK Parliament works and how you can make a difference. It’s down to you that UK Parliament Week is such a success and we can’t wait to hear how you get involved this year! Get Social Follow @YourUKParl on Twitter and share your activities using #UKPW. Or visit ukparliamentweek.org for more information. Contents It starts with... UK Parliament 02 What is the UK Parliament? 03 Who represents you? 04 Action 06 Get talking 07 Get inspired 10 Get planning 12 You 14 Get creative 15 Voting and elections 16 Influence 18 Engage 20 Fun 24 Quiz 26 Chatterbox 28 01 02 #UKPW What is the What is the difference between UK Parliament? Parliament and Government? The UK Government is responsible for the day-to-day The UK Parliament makes laws, and checks running of the country, while the UK Parliament’s and challenges the work of the UK Government. -
Parallel Chambers
PARALLEL CHAMBERS Memorandum from Sir David Natzler KCB, Clerk of the House of Commons, to The House of Commons (Canada) Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs This memorandum will primarily focus on Westminster Hall, the parallel Chamber in the House of Commons, which has been in operation since 1999. Some reference to the operation of Grand Committees will also be included towards the end of the memorandum. WESTMINSTER HALL Overview 1. During the 1998-99 parliamentary session, the House of Commons Modernisation Committee published two reports regarding proposals for a parallel Chamber. Taking inspiration from procedures used in the House of Representatives, Canberra, where certain business was conducted in a parallel (albeit subordinate) Chamber, the first of these reports indicated some of the issues which would need to be addressed if a parallel Chamber were to be introduced, the impact it might have on the House of Commons, as well as some proposals for how it might work practically. The report was agreed to by the House, and the Committee embarked upon a second report to take the proposals forward. 2. The second of these reports, published later that session, reiterated the arguments for a parallel Chamber and outlined proposals for procedure relating to chairing the sittings, sitting hours, and types of Business to be taken, as well as procedure during the meetings themselves. The Report was approved by the House on 24 May 1999. 3. Since the beginning of the 1999-2000 Session, parallel sittings have been held in Westminster Hall and have provided the House of Commons with an additional forum for debate which has created more parliamentary time without increasing sitting hours. -
Review of Investigative and Scrutiny Committees: Strengthening the Thematic Structure Through the Appointment of New Committees
HOUSE OF LORDS Liaison Committee 5th Report of Session 2019–21 Review of investigative and scrutiny committees: strengthening the thematic structure through the appointment of new committees Ordered to be printed 10 December 2020 and published 15 December 2020 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords HL Paper 193 Liaison Committee The Liaison Committee advises the House on the resources required for select committee work and allocates resources between select committees; reviews the select committee work of the House; considers requests for ad hoc committees and reports to the House with recommendations; ensures effective co-ordination between the two Houses; and considers the availability of Lords to serve on committees. Membership The Members of the Liaison Committee are: Lord Bradley Lord Low of Dalston Lord Davies of Oldham Lord McFall of Alcluith (Chair) Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town Lord Smith of Hindhead Earl Howe Lord Tyler Lord Judge Baroness Walmsley Lord Lang of Monkton Declaration of interests See Appendix 1. A full list of Members’ interests can be found in the Register of Lords’ Interests: http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-interests/register-of-lords- interests Publications All publications of the Committee are available at: http://www.parliament.uk/lords-liaison Parliament Live Live coverage of debates and public sessions of the Committee’s meetings are available at: http://www.parliamentlive.tv Further information Further information about the House of Lords and its Committees, including guidance to witnesses, details of current inquiries and forthcoming meetings is available at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords Committee staff The staff who worked on this inquiry were Philippa Tudor (Clerk), Lucy Molloy (Research Assistant) and Heather Fuller (Committee Assistant). -
Administration – Annual Report and Accounts 2019–20
Annual Report and Accounts 2019–20 The HOUSE of COMMONS: Administration Annual Report and Accounts 2019–20 (for the year ended 31 March 2020) Presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 1(3) of the House of Commons (Administration) Act 1978 and Section 3 (as amended) of the House of Commons (Administration) Act 1978 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 21 July 2020 Published by Authority of the House of Commons HC 580 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/ Contents Performance Report 10 Overview 10 Joint foreword by the Clerk of the House and the Director General 10 Who we are 12 Our strategy 13 Our corporate culture 15 What we do 17 Finance summary 2019-20 18 Performance summary 2019-20 19 Performance Analysis 23 Facilitating effective scrutiny and debate 23 Involving and inspiring the public 24 Securing Parliament’s future 27 Creating a diverse and inclusive working environment 29 How we measure performance 31 Other corporate reporting 31 Accountability Report 40 Corporate Governance 40 Statement of Accounting Officer’s Responsibilities 40 Governance Statement 41 Remuneration and Staff Report 64 a) Remuneration policy 64 b) Staff Report 70 Parliamentary Accountability and Audit Report 75 a) Statement of Parliamentary Supply 75 b) Statement of Parliamentary Supply Commentary 78 Parliamentary Accountability Disclosures 85 a) Losses and special payments 85 b) Fees -
Process Matters: Petitions Systems in Britain's
Process Matters: Petitions Systems in Britain’s Legislatures Catherine Bochel Reader in Policy Studies School of Social & Political Sciences University of Lincoln Brayford Pool Lincoln LN6 7TS Tel: 01522 886324 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements This work was supported by the British Academy under Grant SG101961. I am grateful for the comments of the anonymous reviewers. 1 Abstract Over the past fifteen years petitions systems have become embedded in the Scottish Parliament and the National Assembly for Wales, and more recently the House of Commons. This article uses the concept of procedural justice, with its emphasis on the fairness of the process by which decisions are made, as an analytical tool to explore four case studies of petitions systems in British legislatures, considering, in particular, the extent to which they enable voice, decision making and transparency. It illustrates that the application of ideas of procedural justice not only provides us with a useful tool for analysing petitions systems in representative political institutions, but also potentially provides a framework of ideas from which petitions systems, and perhaps other participatory initiatives, may learn. Keywords Legislatures, participation, petitions systems, procedural justice, transparency, voice. 2 Introduction Notions of procedural justice, with its focus on fairness of process, have been used in a variety of fields, including psychology, law and business. This article applies procedural justice as an analytical tool to study a number of petitions systems in legislative bodies in the United Kingdom. The Wright Committee (House of Commons Reform Committee, 2009) and the subsequent inquiry into the impact of the Wright reforms (House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, 2013) highlighted the need for greater public engagement with Parliament, with the Wright Committee (p. -
Brand Guidelines for Official Partners Brand Guidelines for Official Partners Contents
BRAND GUIDELINES FOR OFFICIAL PARTNERS BRAND GUIDELINES FOR OFFICIAL PARTNERS CONTENTS 01 / Introduction 03 / Application Introduction 2 Posters 15 Booklet 17 02 / Brand Assets Website 20 Logo 4 Kit Assets 22 Typography 6 Social Media Cards 23 Colour Palette 11 Imagery 13 04 / Glossary Glossary of terms 25 UK PARLIAMENT WEEK CONTACT: [email protected] JUNE 2020 BRAND GUIDELINES FOR OFFICIAL PARTNERS INTRODUCTION 01 INTRODUCTION UK PARLIAMENT WEEK CONTACT: [email protected] JUNE 2020 BRAND GUIDELINES FOR OFFICIAL PARTNERS INTRODUCTION 2 Welcome to the UK Parliament Week brand guidelines for Official Partners. We have created this document as a guide for anyone working with the UK Parliament Week visual identity and assets. These guidelines feature guidance on logo usage, how to use the assets such as phrases, words and icons. It also provides guidance on image treatments and examples of the brand identity in application. These brand guidelines are designed to promote a consistent and effective use of the brand identity. UK PARLIAMENT WEEK CONTACT: [email protected] JUNE 2020 BRAND GUIDELINES FOR OFFICIAL PARTNERS LOGO / TYPOGRAPHY / COLOUR PALETTE / IMAGERY 02 BRAND ASSETS UK PARLIAMENT WEEK CONTACT: [email protected] JUNE 2020 BRAND GUIDELINES FOR OFFICIAL PARTNERS LOGO / TYPOGRAPHY / COLOUR PALETTE / IMAGERY 4 When using the logo on light backgrounds, Deep Purple should be used. On dark backgrounds the white version of the logo should be used. The logo should not be recoloured and should only use the colour ways supplied. UK PARLIAMENT WEEK CONTACT: [email protected] JUNE 2020 BRAND GUIDELINES FOR OFFICIAL PARTNERS LOGO / TYPOGRAPHY / COLOUR PALETTE / IMAGERY 5 Logo Do's and Don'ts 1.