DOCSLIB.ORG

Convention on Migratory Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Convention on Migratory Species CONVENTION ON Distr. GENERAL MIGRATORY SPECIES UNEP/CMS/Inf. 8.2 31 October 2005 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH EIGHTH MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Nairobi, 20-25 November 2005 LIST OF RANGE STATES OF MIGRATORY SPECIES INCLUDED IN THE CMS APPENDICES 1. The present list has been compiled by the UNEP/CMS Secretariat, in accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4f), of the Convention, based on information obtained from Parties and supplemented by other sources. Species added to the Appendices by the Conference of the Parties at its first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth meetings (Bonn: 1985, Geneva: 1988 and 1991, Nairobi: 1994, Geneva: 1997, Cape Town: 1999), respectively, have been included. 2. In accordance with the relevant instructions of the 10th meeting of the CMS Scientific Council, a provisional version of this list was circulated to all members of the Council in June 2002, inviting review and possible commments. 3. The term ARange State @ used in the present context has the same meaning as defined in Article I, paragraph I, of the Convention: A... f) ARange @ means all the areas of land or water that a migratory species inhabits, stays in temporarily, crosses or overflies at any time on its normal migration route; ... h) ARange State @ in relation to a particular migratory species means any State (and where appropriate any other Party referred to under sub-paragraph (k) of this paragraph) that exercises jurisdiction over any part of the range of that migratory species, or a State, flag vessels of which are engaged outside national jurisdictional limits in taking that migratory species; ... (k) AParty @ means a State or any regional economic integration organisation constituted by sovereign States which has competence in respect of the negotiation, conclusion and application of international agreements in matters covered by this Convention for which this Convention is in force. @ 4. The present list is submitted to the Conference for the following purposes: C to assist the Parties in determining whether they are Range States in the sense of the above definitions; C to assist the Conference of the Parties in making recommendations to the Parties for improving the conservation status of migratory species and reviewing the progress being made under Agreements; and C to provide the basic information necessary for the Scientific Council to consider, recommend or coordinate appropriate conservation measures to the Conference of the Parties for the species listed in Appendices I and II. 5. In order to maintain an up-to-date list, Parties are required under Article VI, paragraph 2, of the Convention to keep the Secretariat informed in regard to which of the migratory species listed in Appendices I and II they consider themselves to be Range States, including provision of information on their flag vessels engaged outside national jurisdiction or limits in taking the migratory species concerned and, where possible, future plans in respect of such taking. 2 Notes 1. Place names appearing in the list correspond to those used in the United Nations Terminology Bulletin No. 347/Rev.1 (United Nations, 1997), as amended, and the ISO 3166 International Standard (International Organisation for Standardisation, 1988), as amended. A number of country names have been inverted to facilitate reference, as follows: Congo, Democratic Republic of the; Korea, Democratic Republic of; Korea, Republic of; Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of; Moldova, Republic of; Tanzania, United Republic of. A number of abbreviated names have been used, in accordance with the above: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (United Kingdom); and United States of America (United States). 2. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this list do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 3. The names of Range States that are Parties to the Convention as at 1 October 2005 are shown in capitalised type: e.g., ARGENTINA . If a CMS Party has entered a reservation with respect to a particular species, its name appears in normal, underlined type: e.g., Norway . 4. Where appropriate, dependant territories, overseas departments, provinces, states etc. appear in parentheses following the name of the State concerned, according to the following convention. The entry AUNITED KINGDOM (Montserrat) @ indicates that only the island of Montserrat, and not the mainland, is to be considered part of the range of a particular species. Conversely, the entry AUNITED KINGDOM (including Montserrat) @ indicates that the range encompasses mainland United Kingdom as well as the island of Montserrat. If the Convention does not apply to a dependant territory, overseas department etc. of a Party, the entry is shown in normal type: for example, ADenmark (Greenland) @. 5. A(?) @ after a country listing denotes unconfirmed sightings 6. A(Ex) @ after a country listing denotes that the taxon is extinct in that country. Some species have only recently disappeared from those countries; if individuals recover in number they may still return to parts of their former range. For this reason, these countries are also included in the list. 7. Reference to Ainternational waters @ indicates migration of a species in or above the sea or oceans beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, which falls within the substantive scope of the Convention, pursuant to Article I, paragraphs 1f) and h). The text in parentheses indicates the specific regions of these waters in which migration takes place. 8. The list does not distinguish different categories of known usage and occurrence. Therefore, many of the countries listed as Range States for certain species, e.g. Numenius tenuirostris, have been identified as such based on records of vagrancy rather than established patterns of migration, according to the information available. 9. For Aves in Appendix II, Range States have been listed only for individual species or for taxa that include a small number of species; Range States will be specified for taxa with larger numbers of species when Agreements for particular species or groups of species are negotiated. 3 References CITES 1988. Identification Manual, Manual de Identificación, Manuel d`Identification. Vol. 1 & 1a. Mammalia - Monotremata to Cetacea/Carnivora to Artiodactyla. CITES Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland. CITES 1995. Identification Manual, Manual de Identificación, Manuel d`Identification. Vol. 3. Reptilia. CITES Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland. del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal. J. (eds) 1996. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 1-3. Lynx Editions, Barcelona. Görner, M. & Hackethal, H. 1987. Säugetiere Europas. Enke Verlag Stuttgart und Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Munich. Hagemeijer, E.J.M. & Blair, M.J. (Eds) 1997. The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: Their Distribution and Abundance. T & A D Poyser, London. Jefferson, T.A., Leatherwood, S. & Webber, M.A. 1993. Marine mammals of the world. FAO species identification guide. Rome, FAO. Madsen, J., Cracknell, G. & Fox, T. (eds) 1999. Goose populations of the Western Palaearctic. A review of status and distribution. Wetlands International Publ. No. 48, Wetlands International, Wageningen, The Netherlands. National Environmental Research Institute, Rønde, Denmark. Scott, D.A. & Rose, P.M. 1996. Atlas of Anatidae Populations in Africa and Western Eurasia. Wetlands International Publ. No. 41, Wetlands International, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 4 Apx Class Order Family Taxon Range Date of Entry I Mammalia Chiroptera Molossidae Tadarida brasiliensis Antigua and Barbuda; ARGENTINA; Bahamas; Belize; BOLIVIA; Brazil; CHILE; Colombia; Costa Rica; Cuba; Dominica; Dominican 1979 Republic; ECUADOR; El Salvador; FRANCE (Guadeloupe, Martinique); Guatemala; Haiti; Honduras; Jamaica; Mexico; NETHERLANDS (Aruba, Saba, Sint Eustatius, Sint Maarten); Nicaragua; PANAMA; PARAGUAY; PERU; Saint Kitts and Nevis; Saint Lucia; United States (including Puerto Rico); UNITED KINGDOM (Montserrat); URUGUAY; Venezuela I Mammalia Primates Hominidae Gorilla gorilla beringei CONGO, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE; RWANDA; UGANDA 1979 I Mammalia Cetacea Physeteridae Physeter ARGENTINA; AUSTRALIA; BELGIUM; Brazil; Canada; CHILE; China; Colombia; Costa Rica; DENMARK (including cop7 macrocephalus * Greenland); ERITREA; FRANCE (French Polynesia); INDIA; Indonesia; IRELAND; Japan; KENYA; Korea, Democratic People's Republic of; Korea, Republic of; LIBERIA; Mexico; Mozambique; Myanmar; NETHERLANDS; NEW ZEALAND; NORWAY; PANAMA; PORTUGAL; SOUTH AFRICA; SPAIN; SRI LANKA; Suriname; TANZANIA, UNITED REPUBLIC OF; Thailand; UNITED KINGDOM (including Falkland Islands (Malvinas), St. Helena); United States; URUGUAY; Venezuela; international waters I Mammalia Cetacea Platanistidae Platanista gangetica Bangladesh; Bhutan (?); INDIA; Nepal; PAKISTAN cop7 gangetica * I Mammalia Cetacea Pontoporiidae Pontoporia blainvillei * ARGENTINA; Brazil; URUGUAY; international waters (Southwest Atlantic Ocean) cop5 I Mammalia Cetacea Balaenopteridae Balaenoptera borealis * ARGENTINA; AUSTRALIA; Canada; CHILE; China (Taiwan); Cuba; FRANCE (Réunion); Iceland; INDIA; Indonesia; Japan; cop7 KENYA; Korea, Democratic People's Republic of; Korea, Republic of; Malaysia; Mexico; Mozambique; NORWAY; POLAND; Russian Federation; SOUTH AFRICA; SPAIN; Suriname; TANZANIA, UNITED REPUBLIC; Thailand;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interactions of Patagonian Toothfish Fisheries With
    CCAMLR Science, Vol. 17 (2010): 179–195 INTERACTIONS OF PATAGONIAN TOOTHFISH FISHERIES WITH KILLER AND SPERM WHALES IN THE CROZET ISLANDS EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE: AN ASSESSMENT OF DEPREDATION LEVELS AND INSIGHTS ON POSSIBLE MITIGATION STRATEGIES P. Tixier1, N. Gasco2, G. Duhamel2, M. Viviant1, M. Authier1 and C. Guinet1 1 Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé CNRS, UPR 1934 Villiers-en-Bois, 79360 France Email – [email protected] 2 MNHN Paris, 75005 France Abstract Within the Crozet Islands Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), the Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) longline fishery is exposed to high levels of depredation by killer (Orcinus orca) and sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus). From 2003 to 2008, sperm whales alone, killer whales alone, and the two species co-occurring were observed on 32.6%, 18.6% and 23.4% respectively of the 4 289 hauled lines. It was estimated that a total of 571 tonnes (€4.8 million) of Patagonian toothfish were lost due to depredation by killer whales and both killer and sperm whales. Killer whales were found to be responsible for the largest part of this loss (>75%), while sperm whales had a lower impact (>25%). Photo-identification data revealed 35 killer whales belonging to four different pods were involved in 81.3% of the interactions. Significant variations of interaction rates with killer whales were detected between vessels suggesting the influence of operational factors on depredation. When killer whales were absent at the beginning of the line hauling process, short lines (<5 000 m) provided higher yield and were significantly less impacted by depredation than longer lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Presentation Here
    Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Jean-Philippe Palasi Director for European policy Averting global biodiversity loss Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Can we avert global biodiversity loss ? That means addressing 5 direct causes: • Habitat destruction • Over exploitation • Pollution • Invasive species • Climate change Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Can we avert global biodiversity loss ? That means addressing 5 direct causes: • Habitat destruction • Over exploitation • Pollution • Invasive species • Climate change Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Can we avert global biodiversity loss ? That means addressing 5 direct causes: • Habitat destruction • Over exploitation • Pollution • Invasive species • Climate change And several root causes: • Demographic growth • Poverty • Poor governance, corruption and conflicts • Unsustainable economic models (production, Photo 1 consumption and supply chains) 4.2” x 10.31” • Lack of awareness & adequate accounting Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Habitat destruction Climate change species confined to high altitude At 520 ppm (mid-century?) most of coral species in warm waters would scarcely support further growth. Increased droughts in the Amazon basin 2010 vegetation anomalies, Nasa Earth Observatory CC impact on species Chris Thomas (Leeds univ), Nature, 2004 « We predict, on the basis of mid-range climate-warming scenarios for 2050, that 15-37% of species (…) will be committed to exctinction » = 1 million terrestrial species by 2050 Mitigation is key: - Lower climate projections: ~18% - Mid-range: ~24% Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” - Maximum: ~35% Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Biodiversity loss …is a defining issues of our time …is closely linked to climate change …will carry on for decades, probably centuries …can be mitigated through profound changes in our economic and social systems Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” EU action for global biodiversity Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” EU action for global biodiversity 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Weather Anomalies in the Low-Latitude Islands of the Indian Ocean in 1991 Anne Réchou, S
    Investigation of weather anomalies in the low-latitude islands of the Indian Ocean in 1991 Anne Réchou, S. Kirkwood To cite this version: Anne Réchou, S. Kirkwood. Investigation of weather anomalies in the low-latitude islands of the Indian Ocean in 1991. Annales Geophysicae, European Geosciences Union, 2015, pp.789-804. 10.5194/angeo- 33-789-2015. hal-01173951 HAL Id: hal-01173951 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01173951 Submitted on 21 Oct 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Ann. Geophys., 33, 789–804, 2015 www.ann-geophys.net/33/789/2015/ doi:10.5194/angeo-33-789-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Investigation of weather anomalies in the low-latitude islands of the Indian Ocean in 1991 A. Réchou1 and S. Kirkwood2 1Laboratoire de l’Atmosphère et des Cyclones, UMR8105, CNRS, Météo-France, Université de La Réunion, Réunion, France 2Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Box 812, 981 28 Kiruna, Sweden Correspondence to: A. Réchou ([email protected]) Received: 15 November 2014 – Revised: 13 April 2015 – Accepted: 10 June 2015 – Published: 02 July 2015 Abstract. Temperature, precipitation and sunshine duration should be more widespread, it seems unlikely that Pinatubo measurements at meteorological stations across the southern was the cause.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and Its Overseas Entities Joining Forces on Biodiversity and Climate Change
    BEST The EU and its overseas entities Joining forces on biodiversity and climate change Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Azores St-Martin Madeira St-Barth. Guadeloupe Canary islands Martinique French Guiana Reunion Outermost Regions (ORs) Azores Madeira French Guadeloupe Canary Guiana Martinique islands Reunion Azores St-Martin Madeira St-Barth. Guadeloupe Canary islands Martinique French Guiana Reunion Outermost Regions (ORs) Azores St-Martin Madeira St-Barth. Guadeloupe Canary islands Martinique French Guiana Reunion Outermost Regions (ORs) Anguilla British Virgin Is. Turks & Caïcos Caïman Islands Montserrat Sint-Marteen Sint-Eustatius Greenland Saba St Pierre & Miquelon Azores Aruba Wallis Bonaire French & Futuna Caraçao Ascension Polynesia Mayotte BIOT (British Indian Ocean Ter.) St Helena Scattered New Islands Caledonia Pitcairn Tristan da Cunha Amsterdam St-Paul South Georgia Crozet Islands TAAF (Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises) Iles Sandwich Falklands Kerguelen (Islas Malvinas) BAT (British Antarctic Territory) Adélie Land Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) Anguilla The EU overseas dimension British Virgin Is. Turks & Caïcos Caïman Islands Montserrat Sint-Marteen Sint-Eustatius Greenland Saba St Pierre & Miquelon Azores St-Martin Madeira St-Barth. Guadeloupe Canary islands Martinique Aruba French Guiana Wallis Bonaire French & Futuna Caraçao Ascension Polynesia Mayotte BIOT (British Indian Ocean Ter.) St Helena Reunion Scattered New Islands Caledonia Pitcairn Tristan da Cunha Amsterdam St-Paul South Georgia Crozet Islands TAAF (Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises) Iles Sandwich Falklands Kerguelen (Islas Malvinas) BAT (British Antarctic Territory) Adélie Land ORs OCTs Anguilla The EU overseas dimension British Virgin Is. A major potential for cooperation on climate change and biodiversity Turks & Caïcos Caïman Islands Montserrat Sint-Marteen Sint-Eustatius Greenland Saba St Pierre & Miquelon Azores St-Martin Madeira St-Barth.
    [Show full text]
  • FEASIBILITY and DESKTOP STUDIES REGARDING HA 04 FINAL 03.1 Summary and Recommendations
    FEASIBILITY AND DESKTOP STUDIES REGARDING HA 04 FINAL 03.1 Summary and Recommendations P repa red f or: P repa ra t ory C om m i s s i on f or t h e C om preh e n s i v e N u c lea r - Te s t - Ban T r e at y O rg a n i z a t i on ( C T B T O ) P rov i s i on a l T e c h n i c a l S ec ret a ri a t C T B T O , Vi e nna I nte r na ti o na l C e ntr e P . O . B ox 1 2 0 0 , W a g ra m ers t ra s s e 5 A - 1400 V i e n n a , Au s t r i a P repa red b y : M a l l i n C o ns ul ta nts L t d . 3 3 0 T em pe C res c en t N ort h V a n c ou v er B . C . V 7 N 1 E 6 C an ad a 12 A pri l 2012 Summary and Recommendations - Page 1 GLOSSARY: AC Air Conditioning ATP Acceptance Test Plan BMH Beach Manhole CAT Commission Acceptance Tests CD 1.0 Continuous Data Format and Protocol CD 1.1 Formats and Protocols for Continuous Data (CD1.1) COTS/NDI Commercial Off-The-Shelf/Non-Development Items CRF Central Recording Facility CRL Certificate Revocation List CRS Cable Route Survey CTA Cable Termination Assembly CTBT Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban-Treaty CTBTO Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty Organization (Commission) DASS Data Acquisition and Storage Segment dB Decibel dBV/µPa Decibels with respect to one volt per micro Pascal DDFI Digital Data Formatter and Interface DSA Digital Signature Algorithm DSS Digital Signature Standard ESA European Space Agency FAT Factory Acceptance Test hrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Temperature Field in the Crozet and Kerguelen Whaling Grounds
    SURFACE TEMPERATURE FIELD IN THE CROZET AND KERGUELEN WHALING GROUNDS SABURO MACHIDA Whales Research Institute, Tokyo ABSTRACT Some oceanographic conditions in the summer season at the surface in the Crozet and Kerguelen Ridge regions, where the good whaling grounds of baleen whales occur, are discussed on the basis of the distribution of the surface temperature observed by the Japanese whaling fleets in the 1965/66 to 1972/73 Antarctic seasons. The surface isotherms bend northwards over the submarine rising around the Prince Edward, Crozet and Kerguelen Islands. These bends of the iso­ therms suggest to reflect the bending of the surface current, and that it is presumably influenced by the bottom topography. They may be also sug­ gested that the convergence efficiency of the current is comparatively intense north and east of these submarine risings. INTRODUCTION It is well known that the good whaling grounds of baleen whales occur in the Crozet and Kerguelen Ridge regions. In these two regions right whales were taken by the old American whalers mainly in the 19th century and pigmy blue whales were also taken there in the early 1960's. Recently the Japanese whaling fleets have been often searching for the favorite haunts of the sei and fin whales in the regions. We have little knowledge of the general oceangoraphic conditions in the Crozet and Kerguelen whaling grounds, though the oceanographic conditions are the close living evnvironment to the whales. A knowledge of oceanographic conditions is fundamentally necessary to think systematic study on the environment of the habits of various marine organisms. From this point of view, therefore, the purpose of the present study is to discuss the oceanographic conditions at the surface in the Crozet and Kerguelen Ridge regions on the basis of the surface temperature distribu­ tion, which was observed by the Japanese whaling fleets.
    [Show full text]
  • First Records of Aphid-Pathogenic Entomophthorales in the Sub-Antarctic Archipelagos of Crozet and Kerguelen Bernard Papierok, Charles-Antoine Dedryver, Maurice Hullé
    First records of aphid-pathogenic Entomophthorales in the sub-Antarctic archipelagos of Crozet and Kerguelen Bernard Papierok, Charles-Antoine Dedryver, Maurice Hullé To cite this version: Bernard Papierok, Charles-Antoine Dedryver, Maurice Hullé. First records of aphid-pathogenic Ento- mophthorales in the sub-Antarctic archipelagos of Crozet and Kerguelen. Polar Research, Co-Action Publishing, 2016, 35 (1), pp.28765. 10.3402/polar.v35.28765. hal-01425789 HAL Id: hal-01425789 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01425789 Submitted on 27 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Polar Research ISSN: (Print) 1751-8369 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/zpor20 First records of aphid-pathogenic Entomophthorales in the sub-Antarctic archipelagos of Crozet and Kerguelen Bernard Papierok, Charles-Antoine Dedryver & Maurice Hullé To cite this article: Bernard Papierok, Charles-Antoine Dedryver & Maurice Hullé (2016) First records of aphid-pathogenic Entomophthorales in the sub-Antarctic archipelagos of Crozet and Kerguelen, Polar Research, 35:1, 28765, DOI: 10.3402/polar.v35.28765 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/polar.v35.28765 © 2016 B.
    [Show full text]
  • 414 the VOYAGE of HMS CHALLENGER. Chart 2. from England
    414 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Chart 2. From England to the Canary Islands; also from Cape Verde Islands towards England. 3. In. the vicinity of Lisbon. 4. In the vicinity of Madeira. 5. In the vicinity of the Canary Islands. 6. From Canary Islands to St. Thomas, St. Thomas to Bermuda, Bermuda to the Azores, Azores t' Madeira, Madeira to Cape Verde Islands; also from Cape Verde Islands towards England. 7. In the vicinity of the Virgin Islands. 8. In the vicinity of Bermuda. 9. From Bermuda to Halifax, and Halifax to Bermuda. 10. In the vicinity of the Azores. 11. In. the vicinity of the Cape Verde Islands. 12. From Cape Verde Islands to Bahia; also from Ascension to Cape Verde Islands. 13. In the vicinity of St. Paul's Rocks. 14. In the vicinity of Fernando Noronha. 15. In the vicinity of the Coast of Brazil. 16. From Bahia to the Cape of Good Hope; also from Monte Video to Ascension. " 17. In. the vicinity of the Tristan da Cunha Islands. 18. From the Cape of Good Hope to the parallel of 60° S. 19. In. the vicinity of Prince Edward and Marion Islands. 20. In. the vicinity of the Crozet Islands. 21. In the vicinity of Kerguelen Island. 22. In the. vicinity of Heard Island. 23. In. the neighbourhood of the Antarctic Circle, between the meridians of 78° and 98° E. 24. From a position in lat. 59° 56' S., long. 99° 14' E., to Melbourne. 25. From Melbourne to Sydney. 26. In the vicinity of Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • National Involvement in the Indian Ocean Region
    5 December 2011 France: National Involvement in the Indian Ocean Region Bruno de Paiva Future Directions International Research Intern Indian Ocean Research Programme Key Points France has traditionally held a high degree of influence in the western Indian Ocean region and uses its cultural ties, external territories and military power to maintain its regional presence. The region is important to France, due to its strategic location and energy security needs. France’s regional influence is under threat from growing economies such as China, India and Brazil. While current French tactics will increase France’s influence in the Indian Ocean region in the short- and medium- terms, it is likely to lose influence over the longer term. Summary France has a long-standing presence in the western Indian Ocean. Despite the loss of its colonial possessions in India, Mauritius, Madagascar and the Seychelles, France retains the territories of La Réunion, Mayotte and the French Southern and Antarctic Territories. The former colony of Djibouti remains economically and militarily close to France, while relations with the United Arab Emirates have progressed to the hosting of a French military base in Abu Dhabi. For France, the Indian Ocean region – or, at least, its western reaches – continues to be of strategic importance. Over the longer term, however, the increasing interest in the region from growing economies, and the potential competition for resources and influence, may very well lead to a reduction in French influence. Analysis French Activities in the Indian Ocean Region Defence Much of France’s activities in the region have been defence related, with Paris operating a number of military bases in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Trends of Penguins in the French Southern Territories
    Author's personal copy Polar Biology (2020) 43:835–850 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-020-02691-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Population trends of penguins in the French Southern Territories Christophe Barbraud1 · Karine Delord1 · Charles A. Bost1 · Adrien Chaigne2 · Cédric Marteau2 · Henri Weimerskirch1 Received: 31 July 2019 / Revised: 21 April 2020 / Accepted: 29 May 2020 / Published online: 3 June 2020 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract Penguins are important top consumers in marine food webs and are one of the most threatened bird families, especially by climate change and food web alterations by marine fsheries. Yet, long-term population trends are lacking or are uncertain for many populations. Seven species of penguins breeding at the French Southern Territories in the southern Indian Ocean on the Crozet, Kerguelen, Saint-Paul–Amsterdam archipelagos and in Terre Adélie/Adelie Land, Antarctica are monitored regularly. This monitoring started in the early 1950s and most populations have been surveyed during the past four years, allowing assessments of population trends. King penguins increased at nearly all breeding sites within the Crozet and Ker- guelen archipelagos. Emperor penguins have decreased at Terre Adélie/Adelie Land, with a partial recovery of the colony during the 2010s. Gentoo penguin populations at Crozet and Kerguelen are highly variable but stable. Adélie penguins have been increasing in Terre Adélie/Adelie Land. The trends in eastern rockhopper penguins vary between colonies and archipelagos. Northern rockhopper penguins have continuously decreased in numbers at Amsterdam Island, but appear to have increased at the nearby Saint-Paul Island. Macaroni penguins have frst increased and then stabilized since the 2000s at Kerguelen and are stable at the Crozet Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • French Southern Territories
    Important Bird Areas in Africa and associated islands – French Southern Territories ■ FRENCH SOUTHERN TERRITORIES ANTOINE CATARD Grey-headed Albatross Diomedea chrysostoma. (ILLUSTRATION: DAVE SHOWLER) GENERAL INTRODUCTION are endemic and 53 are introduced. It is mostly composed of grasses Agrostis magellanica, Poa cooki, P. annua, mosses and lichens, The Terres Australes Françaises or French Southern Territories are together with several herbaceous species (notably Acaena composed of three sets of islands in the southern Indian Ocean— magellanica, Azorella selago and Pringlea antiscorbutica). Plant Crozet, Kerguelen, and Saint Paul and Amsterdam—with a total cover is significant only in coastal areas at low altitude; above 200 m, area of 760,000 ha. These islands are very isolated and lie at least vascular plants are rare and bare rock dominates the landscape. 2,500 km away from the closest continental shores of Australia, The greatest numbers of birds are found on Île de l’Est, Îles des southern Africa and Antarctica. The nearest islands to the French Apôtres and Îles des Pingouins, where cats and rats are absent. On Southern Territories are Heard Island, 480 km south-east of the Îles Île des Cochons and Île de la Possession where, respectively, cats Kerguelen, and Prince Edward and Marion Islands, 1,000 km west and rats are present, the smaller seabird species, particularly petrels, of the Îles Crozet. There is no permanent human population on these have either been eliminated or are greatly reduced in numbers. islands, but three have stations which house expeditions of 30 to 80 Numbers of albatrosses and penguins nevertheless remain high.
    [Show full text]
  • France in the Indian Ocean: a Geopolitical Perspective and Its Implications for Africa
    MARCH 2017 POLICY INSIGHTS 42 FRANCE IN THE INDIAN OCEAN: A GEOPOLITICAL PERSPECTIVE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR AFRICA AGATHE MAUPIN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The world’s oceans have been brought back into focus in recent years. With an estimated economic value of some $2.5 trillion (ZAR 25.9 trillion), oceans collectively constitute the world’s seventh largest economy and hold a tremendous potential for further economic development.1 Today’s growing interest in maritime affairs, within the international community and among policymakers, revives ancient seaborne trade routes and relationships. For emerging economies, attempts to capture a growing share of the oceans’ value will lead into a rekindling of old ties and a shaping of new ‘blue’ partnerships. As it was once a maritime power, France makes a convincing case for the development of new perspectives with former alliances in the Indian Ocean region (IOR). By maintaining French territories in the southern part of the third-largest ocean in the world, France aims to secure an international AUTHOR position on principal maritime lines and grow economically, as well as to preserve, if not expand, its sphere of influence. DR AGATHE MAUPIN is a Senior Research Associate at the SAIIA INTRODUCTION Foreign Policy programme. She has been working on For centuries, the world’s oceans have facilitated interactions among people. South Africa’s water and As illustrated by the maritime empires built by the European powers during the energy policy since 2010. 17th century, oceans offered a significant potential to increase countries’ spheres of influence. Along with Portugal, Spain, Britain and the Netherlands, France was also a kingdom looking to enter into maritime trade routes, which were opened up by crossing the Indian, Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
    [Show full text]