DOCSLIB.ORG

Southern African Costal Seabirds CAMP 2002.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southern African Costal Seabirds CAMP 2002.Pdf CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOUTHERN AFRICAN COASTAL SEABIRDS Edited by M. du Toit, G.C. Boere, J. Cooper, M.S. de Villiers, J. Kemper, B. Lenten, S.L. Petersen, R.E. Simmons, L.G. Underhill, P.A. Whittington & O.P. Byers Authored by the Workshop participants Workshop Report Cape Town, South Africa 4 – 8 February 2002 Avian Demography Unit, University of Cape Town Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, IUCN/SSC Published by the Avian Demography Unit, University of Cape Town and the Conservation Breeding Specialist Group Avian Demography Unit Conservation Breeding Specialist Group University of Cape Town (IUCN/SSC) Rondebosch, 7701 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road South Africa Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124-8151 USA Telephone: (021) 650-2423 Telephone: (952) 997-9800 Fax: (021) 650-3434 Fax: (952) 997-9803 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: www.aviandemographyunit.org Website: www.cbsg.org © Avian Demography Unit and Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, 2003 Cover photograph: African Penguin Spheniscus demersus, photographed by René Navarro Cover design: Samantha Petersen Typesetting: Samantha Petersen and John Cooper Final editing: John Cooper Printing: University Document Management Services, 161 Lower Main Road, Observatory 7925, South Africa All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the permission of the publishers RECOMMENDED CITATION FORMAT Du Toit, M., Boere, G.C., Cooper, J., de Villiers, M.S., Kemper, J., Lenten, B., Petersen, S.L., Simmons, R.E., Underhill, L.G., Whittington, P.A. & Byers, O. (Eds). 2003. Conservation Assessment and Management Plan for Southern African Seabirds. Cape Town: Avian Demography Unit & Apple Valley: IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group. ii The CBSG Conservation Council These generous contributors make the work of CBSG possible Benefactors ($20,000 and above) Memphis Zoo Potter Park Zoo Riverbanks Zoological Park Chicago Zoological Society Milwaukee County Zoo Staten Island Zoo Minnesota Zoological Garden North Carolina Zoological Park Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo Oklahoma City Zoo Wellington Zoo SeaWorld, Inc. Ocean Park Conservation Welsh Mountain Zoo Toronto Zoo Foundation Wildlife World Zoo, Inc. Paignton Zool. & Botanical John S. Williams Conservators ($15,000 -$19,999) Gardens Zoologischer Garten Rostock Parco Natura Viva—Italy Columbus Zoological Gardens Philadelphia Zoological Garden Saint Louis Zoo Phoenix Zoo Curators ($250-$499) Walt Disney’s Animal Kingdom Pittsburgh Zoo Wildlife Conservation Society - Prudence P. Perry Bramble Park Zoo NYZS Robert Lacy Dr. Edward & Marie Plotka World Association of Zoos & Rotterdam Zoo Emporia Zoo Aquariums -WAZA Royal Zoological Society of Lee Richardson Zoo Zoological Society of London Antwerp Montgomery Zoo Royal Zoological Society of Racine Zoological Society Guardians ($7,000-$14,999) Australia Roger Williams Park Zoo Royal Zoological Society of Rosamond Gifford Zoo Cleveland Zoological Society Scotland Suzanne Gendron Nan Schaffer Saitama Children’s Zoo The Animal Park-Gulf Breeze Toledo Zoological Society San Antonio Zoo Tokyo Zoological Park Society White Oak Conservation Center San Francisco Zoo Topeka Zoo, Friends of Zoological Society of San Diego Sedgwick County Zoo Zoo Madrid Taipei Zoo Protectors ($1,000-$6,999) The WILDS Sponsors ($50-$249) Thrigby Hall Wildlife Gardens African Safari-France African Safari Wildlife Park Tiergarten Schonbrunner Alex Rübel Albuquerque Biological Park Twycross Zoo Alice Springs Desert Park Alice D. Andrews Union of German Zoo Directors American Loriinae Conservancy Allwetter Zoo Munster Wassenaar Wildlife Breeding Apenheul Zoo ARAZPA Centre Bighorn Institute AZA Wilhelma Zoological Garden Brandywine Zoo Audubon Zoological Gardens Woodland Park Zoo Chahinkapa Zoo Bristol Zoo Zoo Frankfurt Darmstadt Zoo Caldwell Zoo Zoologischer Garten Koln Elaine Douglas Calgary Zoo Zoologischer Garten Zurich Folsom Children's Zoo Chester Zoo Jardin aux Oiseaux Cincinnati Zoo Stewards ($500-$999) Jean P. LeDanff Colchester Zoo Aalborg Zoo Mabel Lam Copenhagen Zoo Alameda Park Zoo Lisbon Zoo Detroit Zoological Park Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Miller Park Zoo Durrell Wildlife Conservation Banham Zoo & Sanctuary National Birds of Prey Centre Trust BioSolutions Division of SAIC Nigel Hewston El Paso Zoo Cotswold Wildlife Park Steven J. Olson Everland Zoo Dickerson Park Zoo Palm Beach Zoo at Dreher Park Federation of Zoological Gardens Dutch Federation of Zoological Parc Zoologique de Thoiry of Great Britain & Ireland Gardens Rolling Hills Zoo Fort Wayne Zoological Society Fairchild Tropical Garden Safari Parc de Peaugres Fort Worth Zoo FOTA Wildlife Park Steinhart Aquarium Gladys Porter Zoo Givskud Zoo Stiftung Natur-und Artenschutz in Great Plains Zoo Granby Zoo den Tropen Greater Los Angeles Zoo Knoxville Zoo Teruko Shimizu Association Knuthenborg Park Tautphaus Park Zoo Japanese Association of Zoological Little Rock Zoo Touro Parc-France Parks & Aquariums –JAZGA Lowry Park Leisure & Cultural Services National Aviary in Pittsburgh Supporters ($15-$49) Department of Hong Kong NaturZoo Rheine Lincoln Park Zoo Oglebay's Good Children's Zoo Odense Zoo Living Desert Judie Steenberg Oregon Zoo Loro Parque Ouwehands Dierenpark Marwell Zoological Park Perth Zoo Thank You! September 2004 iii PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................ III A. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 B. THE CAMP PROCESS ................................................................................................................... 4 C. POSSIBLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS CONCERNING THE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN SEABIRDS ................................................................................................................................................ 10 D. CAMP WORKSHOP REQUESTS TO GOVERNMENT ........................................................ 14 E. ACTION PLAN WORKING GROUP REPORTS .................................................................... 15 HUMAN DISTURBANCE IMPACTS ON SOUTHERN AFRICAN SEABIRDS .................................................... 15 HABITAT LOSS AND ALTERATION .......................................................................................................... 21 SEABIRD PREDATORS AND COMPETITORS FOR BREEDING SPACE .......................................................... 27 COMPETITION FOR BREEDING SPACE ..................................................................................................... 30 POLLUTION ............................................................................................................................................ 32 F. TAXON DATA SHEETS AND DISTRIBUTION MAPS ......................................................... 38 AFRICAN PENGUIN ................................................................................................................................. 39 LEACH’S STORM PETREL ....................................................................................................................... 45 GREAT WHITE PELICAN ......................................................................................................................... 50 CAPE GANNET ....................................................................................................................................... 56 CAPE CORMORANT ................................................................................................................................ 61 BANK CORMORANT ............................................................................................................................... 66 CROWNED CORMORANT ........................................................................................................................ 71 WHITE-BREASTED CORMORANT............................................................................................................ 76 SOUTHERN AFRICAN KELP GULL .......................................................................................................... 81 HARTLAUB’S GULL................................................................................................................................ 84 GREY-HEADED GULL ............................................................................................................................. 87 CASPIAN TERN ....................................................................................................................................... 91 ROSEATE TERN ...................................................................................................................................... 95 SWIFT TERN ......................................................................................................................................... 100 DAMARA TERN .................................................................................................................................... 104 ANTARCTIC TERN ................................................................................................................................ 108 AFRICAN BLACK OYSTERCATCHER ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interactions of Patagonian Toothfish Fisheries With
    CCAMLR Science, Vol. 17 (2010): 179–195 INTERACTIONS OF PATAGONIAN TOOTHFISH FISHERIES WITH KILLER AND SPERM WHALES IN THE CROZET ISLANDS EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE: AN ASSESSMENT OF DEPREDATION LEVELS AND INSIGHTS ON POSSIBLE MITIGATION STRATEGIES P. Tixier1, N. Gasco2, G. Duhamel2, M. Viviant1, M. Authier1 and C. Guinet1 1 Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé CNRS, UPR 1934 Villiers-en-Bois, 79360 France Email – [email protected] 2 MNHN Paris, 75005 France Abstract Within the Crozet Islands Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), the Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) longline fishery is exposed to high levels of depredation by killer (Orcinus orca) and sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus). From 2003 to 2008, sperm whales alone, killer whales alone, and the two species co-occurring were observed on 32.6%, 18.6% and 23.4% respectively of the 4 289 hauled lines. It was estimated that a total of 571 tonnes (€4.8 million) of Patagonian toothfish were lost due to depredation by killer whales and both killer and sperm whales. Killer whales were found to be responsible for the largest part of this loss (>75%), while sperm whales had a lower impact (>25%). Photo-identification data revealed 35 killer whales belonging to four different pods were involved in 81.3% of the interactions. Significant variations of interaction rates with killer whales were detected between vessels suggesting the influence of operational factors on depredation. When killer whales were absent at the beginning of the line hauling process, short lines (<5 000 m) provided higher yield and were significantly less impacted by depredation than longer lines.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the 2004 Growth Potential of Towns in the Western Cape Study
    A revision of the 2004 Growth Potential of Towns in the Western Cape study Discussion document A research study undertaken for the Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning of the Western Cape Provincial Government by Stellenbosch University & CSIR RESEARCH TEAM Dr Adriaan van Niekerk* (Project Manager) Prof Ronnie Donaldson* Mr Danie du Plessis† Mr Manfred Spocter‡ We are thankful to the following persons for their assistance: Ms I Boonzaaier*, Mr Nitesh Poona*, Ms T Smith*, Ms Lodene Willemse* * Centre for Geographical Analysis (CGA), Stellenbosch University † Centre for Regional and Urban Innovation and Statistical Exploration (CRUISE), Stellenbosch University ‡ Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) 17 January 2010 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY One of the objectives of the Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning (DEA&DP) is to undertake spatial planning that promotes and guides the sustainable future development of the Western Cape province and redresses spatial inequalities. This goal led to the development of the Provincial Spatial Development Framework (PSDF), which identifies the areas of growth in the province and the areas where, in terms of the sustainable development paradigm, growth should be emphasised in the future. It also addresses the form that this growth or development should take and further emphasises the restructuring of urban settlements to facilitate their sustainability. To provide guidance and support for implementing the PSDF, a thorough understanding and knowledge of the characteristics and performances of all the settlements in the province is needed. The aim of this study was to revise and update the Growth Potential Study of Towns in the Western Cape (Van der Merwe et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Species of Psammophis Boie Found South of Latitude 12° S (Serpentes: Psammophiinae)
    African Journal of Herpetology, 2002 51(2): 83-119. Original article A review of the species of Psammophis Boie found south of Latitude 12° S (Serpentes: Psammophiinae) DONALD G. BROADLEY Research Associate, Natural History Museum of Zimbabwe, Bulawayo Present address: Biodiversity Foundation for Africa,P.O. Box FM 730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe [email protected] Abstract.—The status, relationships and zoogeography of the 14 taxa of Psammophis found south of Latitude 12° S are reviewed and the following taxonomic changes are proposed: 1. Psammophis trinasalis and P. namibensis, previously treated as subspecies of P. leightoni, are recognised as good evolutionary species which show ecological differences. 2. Psammophis orientalis, previously regarded as a subspecies of P. subtaeniatus, differs from the lat- ter in a suite of characters and is parapatric with it in Zimbabwe, so it is now recognised as an evolu- tionary species. 3. Psammophis brevirostris and P. leopardinus, previously regarded as subspecies of P. sibilans (Linnaeus), are recognised as relict evolutionary species. The Zambian populations previously assigned to P. leopardinus have been described as a new species (Hughes & Wade, in press). Key words.—Psammophis, morphology, taxonomy, zoogeography, southern Africa ince the last review of the genus mossambicus has subsequently been applied to SPsammophis in southern Africa (Broadley this eastern sister taxon of P. phillipsii 1977), a revision of the whole genus was the (Hallowell) by Branch (1998) and Hughes subject of a thesis by Frank Brandstätter (1999). (1995), which was subsequently published in summary form (Brandstätter 1996). The result- ing confusion with regard to the northern forms MATERIALS AND METHODS of the P.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2019–0009; FF09E21000 FXES11190900000 167]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/10/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-21478, and on govinfo.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2019–0009; FF09E21000 FXES11190900000 167] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Domestic and Foreign Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of review. SUMMARY: In this candidate notice of review (CNOR), we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), present an updated list of plant and animal species that we regard as candidates for or have proposed for addition to the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. Identification of candidate species can assist environmental planning efforts by providing advance notice of potential listings, and by allowing landowners and resource managers to alleviate threats and thereby possibly remove the need to list species as endangered or threatened. Even if we subsequently list a candidate species, the early notice provided here could result in more options for species management and recovery by prompting earlier candidate conservation measures to alleviate threats to the species. This document also includes our findings on resubmitted petitions and describes our 1 progress in revising the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (Lists) during the period October 1, 2016, through September 30, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Potential of Towns in the Western Cape
    Growth Potential of Towns in the Western Cape WESTERN CAPE SPATIAL INFORMATION FORUM 14 November 2013 Growth Potential Study (GPS) of Towns IN A NUTSHELL PURPOSE? Purpose of the GPS is not to identify where growth (e.g. economic, population and physical) should occur, but rather where it is likely to occur (in the absence of significant interventions). HOW? Use quantitative data (measurements) to model the growth preconditions and innovation potential. BACKGROUND • 2004: GPS1 • Van der Merwe, Zietsman, Ferreira, Davids • 2010: GPS2 • Van Niekerk, Donaldson, Du Plessis, Spocter • 2012/13: GPS3 • Van Niekerk, Donaldson, Du Plessis, Spocter, Ferreira, Loots GPS3: PROJECT PLAN 1. Functional region mapping 2. Qualitative analysis 3. Public participation 4. Public sector priorities alignment 5. Quantitative analysis 6. Draft Report 7. Public comment GPS3: PROJECT PLAN 1. Functional region mapping 2. Qualitative analysis 3. Public participation 4. Public sector priorities alignment 5. Quantitative analysis 6. Draft Report 7. Public comment QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS PROCEDURE 1. Create conceptual framework for estimating growth potential 2. Identify indicators that address growth potential concepts 3. Collect and manipulate data 4. Carry out statistical analyses to reduce data duplication 5. Carry out spatial analyses 6. Perform sensitivity analysis 7. Present and interpret the results DATA COLLECTION & MANIPULATION • Needed to collect data for all local municipalities and 131 settlements (as defined in GPS1) • Thiessen (Voronoi)
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Presentation Here
    Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Jean-Philippe Palasi Director for European policy Averting global biodiversity loss Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Can we avert global biodiversity loss ? That means addressing 5 direct causes: • Habitat destruction • Over exploitation • Pollution • Invasive species • Climate change Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Can we avert global biodiversity loss ? That means addressing 5 direct causes: • Habitat destruction • Over exploitation • Pollution • Invasive species • Climate change Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Can we avert global biodiversity loss ? That means addressing 5 direct causes: • Habitat destruction • Over exploitation • Pollution • Invasive species • Climate change And several root causes: • Demographic growth • Poverty • Poor governance, corruption and conflicts • Unsustainable economic models (production, Photo 1 consumption and supply chains) 4.2” x 10.31” • Lack of awareness & adequate accounting Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Habitat destruction Climate change species confined to high altitude At 520 ppm (mid-century?) most of coral species in warm waters would scarcely support further growth. Increased droughts in the Amazon basin 2010 vegetation anomalies, Nasa Earth Observatory CC impact on species Chris Thomas (Leeds univ), Nature, 2004 « We predict, on the basis of mid-range climate-warming scenarios for 2050, that 15-37% of species (…) will be committed to exctinction » = 1 million terrestrial species by 2050 Mitigation is key: - Lower climate projections: ~18% - Mid-range: ~24% Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” - Maximum: ~35% Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Biodiversity loss …is a defining issues of our time …is closely linked to climate change …will carry on for decades, probably centuries …can be mitigated through profound changes in our economic and social systems Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” EU action for global biodiversity Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” EU action for global biodiversity 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Responses of Boobies and Other Seabirds in the Galapagos to the 1986-87 El Nino- Southern Oscillation Event
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published March 22 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. Differential responses of boobies and other seabirds in the Galapagos to the 1986-87 El Nino- Southern Oscillation event David J. Anderson Department of Biology. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA ABSTRACT: The impact of the 1986-87 El Nido-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) event on seabirds in the Galapagos Islands was generally less severe than that of the previous ENSO in 1982-83. Sea surface temperatures (SST) rose to levels comparable to those of 4 ENSOs pnor to the 1982-83 event. SST became anomalous approximately in January and had returned to typical levels by July. Blue-footed booby Sula nebouxii reproductive attempts failed throughout the archipelago, and breeding colonies were deserted, shortly after SST became unusually warm in January. Masked boobies S. dactylatra, red- footed boobies S. sula and several other species were apparently unaffected by the anomalous conditions, or temporarily suspended breeding for several months. A gradient in both SST and in the ENSO's impact on some seabirds was evident, with populations nesting in the cooler south of the archipelago affected less than those in the warmer north. At one colony studied both before and during the ENSO, blue-footed booby failure was associated with apparent reductions in both availablllty and body size of their primary prey item. INTRODUCTION 1985 (Valle 1986). The diversity of responses produced seabird assemblages with proportions and reproductive Oceanographic change has a dramatic impact upon performances that were markedly different, over the tropical seabird reproduction and adult mortality on short term at least, from pre-ENS0 assemblages, and both local and regional scales.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spirituality of Mercy in a Time of War
    Religion &Theology Religion & Theology 18 (2011) 147–172 brill.nl/rt A Spirituality of Mercy in a Time of War Pieter G. R. de Villiers Department of Old and New Testament, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, Republic of South Africa [email protected] Abstract This article discusses the diary of the Rev. A. D. Luckhoff, written during the South African War in the infamous Bethulie concentration camp from the perspective of his Spirituality of mercy. It analyses the diary in terms of mercy as giving love, as charitableness and as respect for human dignity. It then investigates mercy in the diary as compassion and vulnerability, before it con- cludes by discussing how Lukchoff ’s faith in providence, his awareness of a divine call, his inner space of homeliness and love empower mercy. Keywords mercy, vulnerability, compassion, spirituality, A. D. Luckhoff 1. Introduction One of the best-known personalities in the Dutch Reformed church of the early twentieth century was the Rev. Abraham D. Luckhoff. Born in 1874 from a colourful family of pastors from Rhenish, Wesleyan and Dutch Reformed contexts,1 he is first and foremost remembered for his lifelong work in the Dutch Reformed Church’s welfare department for a period of 27 years (1916–1943). His upliftment of communities made a lasting impression on the church, his community and even the country to the extent that his advice on matters of upliftment was often asked by state departments, whilst he was 1 Cf. F. Pretorius’ introduction to A. D. Luckhoff, Woman’s Endurance (Pretoria: Protea, 2006 [1904]), iii–ix.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Conservation Measures and New Breeding Records for Damara Terns Sterna Balaenarum in Namibia
    Braby et al.: Breeding of Damara Terns Sterna balaenarum in Namibia 81 SUCCESSFUL CONSERVATION MEASURES AND NEW BREEDING RECORDS FOR DAMARA TERNS STERNA BALAENARUM IN NAMIBIA R.J. BRABY1, ANAT SHAPIRA2 & R.E. SIMMONS3 1Resource Management, Ministry of Environment & Tourism, P/Bag 5018, Swakopmund, Namibia 2Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel 3National Biodiversity Programme, Directorate of Environmental Affairs, Ministry of Environment & Tourism, P/Bag 13306, Windhoek, Namibia ([email protected]) Received 19 February 2001, accepted 23 July 2001 SUMMARY BRABY, R.J., SHAPIRA, A. & SIMMONS, R.E. 2001. Successful conservation measures and new breeding records for Damara Terns Sterna balaenarum in Namibia. Marine Ornithology 28: 81–84. Damara Terns Sterna balaenarum nest at high densities on the central Namibian coast and overlap in both space and time with vacationing fishermen and quad bikers. This results in high non-hatching rates of up to 50% and reduced breeding success for the densest known colony of terns. In November 2000, information boards and a barrier preventing off-road vehicles from entering a Damara Tern breeding site near Swakopmund were erected. Comparisons between nesting density, hatching success and vehicles passes before and after these measures showed that nesting density increased slightly (12 to 15 nests/km2/month), hatching success increased from 56% to 80% and vehicle passes dropped from 870 per month to zero. The overall result was a doubling of the number of chicks hatched in the study area. The success of this approach augurs well for similar approaches to other conflicts between semi-colonial coastal-breeding birds and visitors. New breeding records from southern Namibia and a nesting record from 11.5 km inland are also detailed in our attempt to elucidate the ecology and conser- vation of this rare seabird.
    [Show full text]
  • CROWNED CORMORANT | Microcarbo Coronatus (Phalacrocorax Coronatus)
    CROWNED CORMORANT | Microcarbo coronatus (Phalacrocorax coronatus) J Kemper | Reviewed by: T Cook; AJ Williams © Jessica Kemper Conservation Status: Near Threatened Southern African Range: Coastal Namibia, South Africa Area of Occupancy: 6,700 km2 Population Estimate: 1,200 breeding pairs in Namibia Population Trend: Stable to slightly increasing Habitat: Coastal islands and rocks, protected mainland sites, artificial structures, inshore marine waters Threats: Disturbance, entanglement in human debris and artificial structures, predation by gulls and seals, pollution from oiling 152 BIRDS TO WATCH IN NAMIBIA DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE TABLE 2.5: A resident species with some juvenile dispersal, this small Number of Crowned Cormorant breeding pairs at individu- cormorant is endemic to south-west Namibia and west al breeding localities in Namibia (listed north to south), esti- to south-western South Africa. It has a very restricted mated from annual peaks of monthly nest counts at Mercu- ry, Ichaboe, Halifax and Possession islands, and elsewhere range along the coastline (Crawford 1997b), occupying an from opportunistic counts, not necessarily done during peak area of about 6,700 km2 in Namibia (Jarvis et al. 2001). It breeding (Bartlett et al. 2003, du Toit et al. 2003, Kemper et usually occurs within one kilometre of the coast, and has al. 2007, MFMR unpubl. data). not been recorded more than 10 km from land (Siegfried et al. 1975). It breeds at numerous localities in Namibia Number of Date of most and South Africa. In Namibia, it is known to breed at 12 breeding recent reliable islands, five mainland localities and one artificial structure, Breeding locality pairs estimate from Bird Rock Guano Platform near Walvis Bay to Sinclair Bird Rock Platform 98 1999/2000 Island (Table 2.5: Bartlett et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden Urged to Protect 19 Foreign Species
    Via electronic and certified mail February 3, 2021 Scott de la Vega Director Acting Secretary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, NW 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240 Washington, DC 20240 [email protected] Don Morgan Chief, Branch of Delisting and Foreign Martha Williams Species, Ecological Services Principal Deputy Director 5275 Leesburg Pike U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Falls Church, VA 22041-3808 1849 C Street, NW [email protected] Washington, DC 20240 [email protected] Re: Sixty-Day Notice of Intent to Sue for Failing to Make Timely 12-Month Findings on Foreign Candidate Species in Violation of the Endangered Species Act Dear Acting Secretary de la Vega, Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Principal Deputy Director Williams, and Chief Morgan, On behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity (Center), we write to notify you that the U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (together, the Service) are currently in violation of Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for failing to make required 12-month findings on 19 foreign candidate species (Table 1). Section 4(b)(3) of the ESA requires the Service to determine if ESA protections are warranted for a species within 12 months of previously finding that listing was precluded by other pending proposals.1 Here, the Service found listing of 19 foreign species was warranted but precluded on October 10, 2019, and thus new listing determinations were due by October 10, 2020—nearly four months ago.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Africa's Birds
    An assessment by the BirdLife Africa Partnership1 State of Africa’s birds INTRODUCTION: The importance of birds and biodiversity Biodiversity Foreword underpins In 2009, BirdLife Botswana, the BirdLife Partner in Botswana, working with the Government of Botswana, established a Bird Population Monitoring (BPM) Programme. The BPM Programme is part of our lives the global Wild Bird Index effort, which uses information on birds to assess the overall condition of ecosystems and the environment on which we all depend. These trends will be used to set Africa is rich in its variety of conservation priorities, report on biodiversity changes (including the response of fauna and flora to living things, together referred climate change), as well as serve as useful inputs to State Of the Environment Reports and national to as biodiversity. Biodiversity reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). is fundamental to human wellbeing: it offers multiple Currently there are over 350 volunteers supporting the programme who regularly monitor 241 transects spread throughout the country. My Government has been particularly supportive of the BPM opportunities for development Programme because it, among other things, bolsters the participation of rural communities in natural and improving livelihoods. resources management. Additionally, analysis of bird data will influence environmental policies and It is the basis for essential their implementation (e.g. game bird hunting quotas, and the control of the Red-billed Quelea), environmental services upon land-use planning and tourism development. The science of using bird information by the BirdLife which life on earth depends. Global Partnership to inform policies has far reaching impacts from local to global level.
    [Show full text]