DOCSLIB.ORG

Logistic and Transit System in Latvia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

LogisticLogistic andand TransitTransit systemsystem inin LatviaLatvia Andris Maldups Director of the Transit Policy Department Nevember, 2009 Latvia as a natural bridge in EuroAsia traffic 1520mm Common: thus there is no need: single infrastructure to spend time at bordercrossings single rolling stock to change wheels unified information exchange system to change the documentation to make customs clearance on the border single documentation Transport system of Latvia Cargo turnover in the portsofLatvia 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 0 Cargo turnover Latvian in ports 1996-2008 thousand of 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 45034 50690 52292 49026 51843 56915 tonns 52155 54755 57400 60042 59497 62434 63645 Railway cargo turnover Railway cargo turnover 1996-2008 thousands of tonns 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 54861 48731 51058 52164 56061 48355 35264 37857 33208 36412 37884 40100 41018 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Transit cargo in the total Internal cargo turnover transported by Export 5% Import 2% rail 9% Transit 84% Total turnover~ 56.1 mill.t Transit via ports ~ 47.0 mill.t Comparison of major traffic routes LATVIA 20 days JAPAN SOUTH CHINA KOREA 35 days 45 days Transportation from China trough Kazahstan, Russia and Latvian ports may save at least 20 days in comparison with traditioanl sea routes Mainrailway corridors for Euro – Asia connections (OSJD) TEN –T axes to neighbouring countries Transport policy document “Networks for peace and developmemt. Extension of the major trans-European transport axes to the neighbouring countries and regions” accent significant role of Latvia as a gateway between EU and Russia (and further Far Esat and Asia) – the only direct channel from and to Russia lies via Latvia! Multimodal transport coridors Moscow 4 1 2 3 3 a 5 1. Western Еurope – Latvian ports – the Central regions of Russia 2. Central Europe – Latvian border – the Central regions of Russia 3. Latvian ports – Каzahstan – Northwetern China 4. Far East– Trans Siberian magistral – Latvian ports 5. Far East– Black sea – Latvian ports -Scandinavia Free ports and SEZ Advantages: •80-100% rebate on real estate and corporate income taxes • VAT 0% for goods and services provided in free ports and SEZ • VAT, excise tax and customs duty exemptions on import for companies operating in free ports and SEZ • Application of 0% VAT to majority of services • Special procedure of paying customs duties, VAT and natural resources tax Latvia has three major ports - Ventspils, Riga, and Liepaja and seven minor ports - Salacgriva, Lielupe, Engure, Mersrags, Roja, Kolka and Pavilosta. Latvian ports offer: - Technical equipment for handling different cargo - Well developed transport infra-structure - Servicing ships in any weather conditions - Free space for development - Excellent conditions for the development of industrial and distribution parks Freeport of Ventspils Deepest ice free port in the Baltic Sea Multipurpose port with main commodities: liquid bulk – oil products, liquid chemicals dry bulk – potash, coal, grain, peat, woodchips general cargo – containers, Ro - Ro Development of Ventspils Free Port is planned according to three main goals: 1. Retain and strengthen port’s current positions in liquid and dry bulk cargo markets 2. Diversification by development of new services in the port 3. Development of industrial activities in the port www.portofventspils.lv Freeport of Ventspils Cargo turnover in port of Ventspils 2000-2008 thousands of tonns 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 28570 28704 29863 31037 27316 27805 29062 34755 37937 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 •The total capacity of the Port reaches 80 million tons per The structure of the cargo turnover of the Ventspils year Freeport in 2008 metals; 15.7 other; 3024 •In 2008 were handled 28,57 million tons fertilizers; 2673.6 containers; 142.1 timber; 377.6 coal; 4460 •In 2008 – 14 068 TEU roll on/roll of; 1355.1 petroleum; pertoleum 1492.1 products; 15029.6 Freeport of Ventspils o Ferry lines: Operated by Scandlines: o Ventspils – Nīneshamn (Sweeden) 5 times per week o Ventspils – Rostock (Germany) 6 times per week Regular container operator Maersk in Operated by SSC Ferries collaboration with Teamline is calling o Ventspils - Ventspils freeport Mintu (Sāremā Estonia) 4 times per week Rotterdam - Hamburg - St,Peterburg – Ventspils – Rotterdam NNVT – Nord Nathie Ventspils terminal o Capacity up to 400 000 TEU o Multi purpose: 36 Ha o Concession: 30 years o Quaylength: 1000m/draft 14m o Container crane: 60T/reach 37m o Rail-mounted crane: 35T o Mobile Gottwald crane: 100T/reach 44m o Rail connected o Distribution warehouse Seaward expansion of the Ventspils Free Port developing container and general cargo transshipment possibilities Freeport of Riga • The largest port in the Baltic Sea region with total territory of 6433 ha • The shortest distance from EU to CIS countries Riga – Moscow 940km • Multifunctional port, handling all types of cargo except crude oil • Navigation available all year round Development of the Freeport of Riga is focused on the following: • Construction of a new container terminal with capacity of 1 000 000 TEU • Construction of a new terminal for general and dry bulk cargo of size 65 ha • Reconstruction of exsisting and building of a new railway access to the port terminals • Available land sites 450 ha www.freeportofriga.lv CARGOCARGO TURNOVERTURNOVER ININ 20082008 Cargo turnover in port of Riga 2000-2008 thousands of Containerized cargo turnover in port of Riga 2000- tonns 2008 (TEU) 30000 250000 25000 200000 20000 150000 15000 10000 100000 5000 50000 13352 14884 18108 23991 24429 25357 25933 29566 21722 84928 101077 132109 121784 152166 211840 210953 176826 0 168978 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 The structure of the cargo turnover of the Freeport of Riga in 2008 timber; 2040.5 other; 3860 fertilizers; 1944.2 conatainers; metals; 19.3 1912.9 roll on/roll of; 650 petroleum; 5358.7 coal; 13776.2 ININ 20082008 FREEPORT FREEPORT OFOF RIGARIGA HANDLEDHANDLED 29,5729,57 MLN MLN TONSTONS OFOF CARGOCARGO Riga freeport o MSC Line (Antwerp– Riga–Kotka-Helsinki Tallinn) o Maersk Sealand (Bremerhafen– Riga –Kotka– Rauma-Bremerhafen) o French Baltic Line (CMA-CGM) (Riga–Hamburg-Klaipeda) o Unifeeder Container Service (Bremerhafen - Hamburg – Riga - Klaipeda) o Team Lines (Hamburg-Bremerhafen-Riga- Klaipeda) o Containerships (Rotterdam-Teesport –Klaipeda - Riga) o Inter Marine Container Lines (Hamburg- Gdyn-Gdansk– Riga) Freeport of Riga The new container terminal The new dry bulk & general cargo terminal The new bridge for the Available territories container terminal for new business activities The new railway access Port of Liepaja •Max draught (m) – 9.5 •Max length (m) – 225 •Total port territory (ha) - 1182 - Land area (ha) - 372 - Water area (ha) - 810 •Non - freezing port all year round. •Open for navigation 24 hrs a day •Secure ship traffic co – ordination equipment and pilot/ tugboat services •Developed transport infrastructure •Diversified port services •Free territories for Greenfield investments •17 stevedoring, ships’ agent, forwarding and chartering companies. Port of Liepaja Cargo turnover in port of Liepaja 2000-2008 The structure of the cargo turnover of the port of Liepaja in thousands of tonns 2008 Cargo turnover in port of Liepaja 2000-2008 5000 The structure ofthousands the cargo turnover of tonns of the port of Liepaja in 4500 other; 974 2008 grain; 1418.2 4000 5000 3500 4500 3000 containers;4000 36.1 other; 974 grain; 1418.2 3500 2500 3000 2000 containers;2500petroleum 36.1 1500 products;2000 522.9 1000 1500 500 petroleum 4508 1000 4857 4474 4001 4039 4187 2965 3260 4318 timber; 463.1 500products;petroleum; 522.9 274.4 4508 0 4857 4474 4001 4039 4187 2965 3260 4318 metals; 498.8 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 0 timber; 463.1 2000petroleum; 2001 274.4 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 metals; 498.8 Containerized cargo turnover in port of Liepaja 2000-2008 (TEU) 7809 7665 8000 7000 6000 4227 5000 3278 2798 3144 4000 2652 2764 2276 3000 2000 1000 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Port of Liepaja Future priorities: o Deepening up to 12,5 meters o Establishing of container block trains o Creation of 2 new container terminal: 50 ha and 30 ha www.liepaja-sez.lv Opportunities for investment in logistics and distribution services Baltica - Transit Regular container train bring containers ut to five time per week between Baltic ports and Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kirgizstan, Turkmenistan) Baltica - Tranzit 2003 - 2008 (TEU) 21749 25000 20000 16019 15000 10139 6949 10000 4364 5000 1297 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Next step is to prolong this line and to connect it with China. Both governments and private operators of Latvia, China and Kazakhstan are working on the development of this route. New project “ZUBR” Route: Riga – Minsk (colecting cargo also from Estonia and other Latvian ports, in future extension to Ukraine) Operator: LDZ Cargo Logistika Ltd. Transport chain from China to EU 从中国至欧盟的运输链 Test train has been launched (96 TEU) 25.04.2008. (China) – 06.05.2008. (Riga) – 08.05.2008. (Hamburg) 10 days transit time from Dostyk to Riga terminal 从多斯提克至终点站里加运输时间为期10天 14 days transit time from terminal Urumqi to door Central EU 从终点站乌鲁木齐至中欧运输时间为期14天 Transport mode index: 运输方式索引 CN-KZ by rail (switch gauge: Alashankou-Dostik) 从中国至 哈萨 克斯坦用 火车 运输（在 阿拉
Recommended publications
  • Significance of the European Fisheries Fund in the Development of Fishery in Latvian Ports Inese Biukšānea*

    Significance of the European Fisheries Fund in the Development of Fishery in Latvian Ports Inese Biukšānea*

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 110 ( 2014 ) 410 – 418 Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Education 2013 Significance of the European Fisheries fund in the development of fishery in Latvian ports Inese Biukšānea* aRiga Technical University, Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management, Struktoru Street 14, Riga, LV-1039, Latvia Abstract Latvian ports are being developed as elements of a united transport logistics chain connecting the Baltic and other EU states, CIS states, Asia and America – they facilitate not only economic development of seaports and whole regions, but also the existence and development of fishery sector, wherewith the role of ports both in Latvia and in the EU continually increases. Technologically well-provided and developed ports is one of the basic principles of successful development of fishery sector, wherewith a great significance has an efficient use of the means allocated by the European Fisheries Fund. © 20142014 TheThe Authors.Authors. PublishedPublished byby ElsevierElsevier Ltd.Ltd. Selection andand peer-reviewpeer-review underunder responsibilityresponsibility ofof thethe ContemporaryContemporary IssuesIssues in in Business, Business, Management Management and and Education Education conference. conference. Keywords: cohesion policy; European Fisheries Fund; fisheries sector; Latvian ports. 1. Introduction After entering the European Union (hereinafter – the EU), likewise for the other member states, for Latvia became available the funding of the European Fisheries Fund (hereinafter – EFF) provided for the development fisheries. In the Fisheries Sector Strategic Plan of Latvia for years 2007–2013 the fisheries’ sector development was put forward an aim: opportunities of sustainable use of fish resources for the next generations and prosperity of the people involved in the fisheries (Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Latvia, 2006).
  • Operational Challenges to Port Interfaces in the Multi-Modal Transport Chain (Maritime and Hinterland Connections)

    Operational Challenges to Port Interfaces in the Multi-Modal Transport Chain (Maritime and Hinterland Connections)

    Operational Challenges to Port Interfaces in the Multi-modal Transport Chain (Maritime and Hinterland Connections) 2013 Table of contest Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 PART I EVALUATION OF THE EXISTING SITUATION .................................................... 5 1. Research methodology ....................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Setting the Criteria ....................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Selection of indicators ............................................................................................... 11 2. Latvian ports ..................................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Freeport of Riga ......................................................................................................... 22 2.2 Port of Liepaja ........................................................................................................... 33 2.3 Port of Ventspils ........................................................................................................ 38 3. Lithuanian ports ................................................................................................................ 43 3.2 Port of Klaip ėda ........................................................................................................
  • Production and Co-Operation in Agriculture

    Production and Co-Operation in Agriculture

    ECONOMIC SCIENCE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT Production and Co-operation in Agriculture № 34 Jelgava 2014 TIME SCHEDULE OF THE CONFERENCE Preparation: October 2013 – 20 April 2014 Process: 24-25 April 2014 University of Economics, Prague Czech Republic Estonian University of Life Sciences Estonia BA School of Business Latvia Baltic International Academy Latvia Latvian State Institute of Agrarian Economics Latvia University of Latvia Latvia Latvia University of Agriculture Latvia Riga International School of Economics and Business Latvia Administration Latvian State Forest Research Institute “Silava” Latvia Institute for National Economy Research Latvia Riga Technical University Latvia Rezekne Higher Education Institution Latvia State Priekuli Plant Breeding Institute Latvia Ventspils University College Latvia Aleksandras Stulginskis University Lithuania Kaunas University of Technology Lithuania Vilnius University Lithuania Mykolas Romeris University Lithuania Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Lithuania Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Lithuania Szczecin University Poland University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn Poland Warsaw University of Life Sciences Poland Poznan University of Economics Poland West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin Poland University of Agriculture in Krakow Poland Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute, Warsaw Poland Welfare Projects Academy of Sciences in Lodz Poland South Dakota State University USA Pennsylvania State University, State College USA Russian
  • In the Baltic States

    In the Baltic States

    SEAPORTS IN THE BALTIC STATES FLANDERS INVESTMENT & TRADE MARKET SURVEY Seaport in the Baltic States December 2017 Thomas Castrel, Vlaams economisch vertegenwoordiger Flanders Investment & Trade Gedimino Prospektas 20 LT-01103 Vilnius Lithuania [email protected] Seaports in the Baltic States, 2017 1 Table of Content Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Klaipėda State Seaport ............................................................................................................................ 5 Overview ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Activities ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Connectivity and advantages ............................................................................................................. 7 Cargo volume & structure .................................................................................................................. 8 Klaipėda port expansion and dredging 2018-2022 .......................................................................... 10 Port of Liepāja ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Overview .........................................................................................................................................
  • Appeal to Mariners, Harbour Masters and Ship Owners

    Appeal to Mariners, Harbour Masters and Ship Owners

    Appeal to Mariners, Harbour masters and Ship Owners Report to Maritime Administration of Latvia if: - information provided in this book does not correspond with the real-life situation; - mistakes or inaccuracies have been found in this book; - there is information regarding real or suspected new dangers to navigation. Maritime Administration of Latvia contacts Trijādības Street 5, Rīga, Latvia, LV-1048 Phones: +371 67 062 101 e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] www.lja.lv www.lhd.lv ISBN 978-9984-628-72-1 Published by Maritime Administration of Latvia, 2002 The contents of this publication are protected by copyright and without special permission or agreement must not be reproduced in any way, shape or form. Maritime Administration of Latvia, 2021 Translation provided by Daina Gross, 2014. Updates: September 2021 Notices to Mariners: 2021: 103, 212, 243, 244, 245 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .....................................................................................................................................................3 PART A .....................................................................................................................................................................5 Preface ..............................................................................................................................................................5 A.1. Sources ......................................................................................................................................................6
  • LATVIA Reimbursable Advisory Services to the Ministry Of

    LATVIA Reimbursable Advisory Services to the Ministry Of

    LATVIA Reimbursable Advisory Services To the Ministry of Transport of Latvia REVIEW OF THE PORTS SECTOR OF LATVIA: COMPETITIVENESS AND GOVERNANCE Final Report October 2013 The World Bank Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Overview of the Port Sector .................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Background ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Regional Traffic is Growing Rapidly ............................................................................. 12 1.3. Recent performance of Latvian ports ............................................................................. 14 1.4. Prospective ..................................................................................................................... 20 2. Supply Chain ......................................................................................................................... 22 2.1. National Port and Transit Sector Strategy ...................................................................... 22 2.2. Shipping Services ........................................................................................................... 24 2.3. Land transport
  • Questionnaire For

    Questionnaire For

    Response to questionnaire for: Assessment of strategic plans and policy measures on Investment and Maintenance in Transport Infrastructure Country: Latvia 1 INTRODUCTION An efficient and competitive transport system is one of the most substantial preconditions for ensuring the economic and social development of Latvia. Over an extended period of time a relatively balanced transport network has evolved in the country, which in general ensures the flow of freights and passengers. 1.1 Infrastructure Latvian road network Territory of Latvia – 64 559 km2 Population as at January 1, 2012 – 2 207 600 In Latvia are registered 72 441.484 km of roads and streets. The average density of the roads network is 1.122 km per 1 km2 . The total length of roads under the supervision of State Joint Stock Company "Latvian State Roads" - 20 116.332 km. The average density of the state roads network is 0.312 km per 1 km2 . Road network structure Average annual Average annual Average annual Average annual Road length as at January 1, 2011, km daily traffic in daily traffic in daily traffic in daily traffic in asphalt- crushed- concrete total length stone and without includin includin includin includin and other of road total total total total gravel pavement g trucks g trucks g trucks g trucks bituminous network pavements pavements Road classes State roads, 8456 11661 - 20116 including: Main roads 1651 - - 1651 5624 1090 4899 847 4809 984 4644 996 (A) Regional 4188 1127 - 5316 1213 182 1200 168 1191 179 1164 175 roads (P) Local roads 2617 10533 - 13150 (V) Municipal 5644 33039 - 38683 roads and streets, including: roads 1056 29593 - 30649 1056 streets 4588 3446 - 8035 4588 Forest roads - 6216 3926 10142 - Private roads 500 3000 - 3500 500 Roads and 14599 53916 3926 72441 14599 streets, total Bridges The Latvian State Roads is responsible for 934 bridges, out of which: 878 - reinforced concrete bridges; 145 - stone masonry bridges; 35 - steel bridges; 7 - wooden bridges.
  • The Role of Transit in the Economy of Latvia

    The Role of Transit in the Economy of Latvia

    www.ssoar.info The role of transit in the economy of Latvia Gžibovska, Nataļja Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Gžibovska, N. (2013). The role of transit in the economy of Latvia. Baltic Region, 2, 106-112. https:// doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2013-2-10 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-351091 International cooperation Transit is an important issue in the his- THE ROLE tory of world economy, including the econ- OF TRANSIT omy of Latvia. Transit makes a significant contribution to the budget of many transit IN THE ECONOMY countries, one of which is the Republic of Latvia. These countries do not have signifi- OF LATVIA cant natural resources and prefer to focus on logistics and infrastructure in order to facili- tate the transit process. This article focuses * N. Gžibovska on the role of transit in the economy of Lat- via, whose unique geographical position makes the country an effective transport cor- ridor (bridge) in both the west-east and north-south directions. The article presents the results of an opinion poll conducted at Latvian transit enterprises regarding their future development and offers an overview of the main seaports and the Rīga international airport.
  • Transport' 2008

    Transport' 2008

    Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Latvia Special issue 2008 TRANSPORT‘ 2008 LATVIA AS LOGISTICS AND TRANSIT CENTER WWW.BALTICCOURSE.COM 2 Latvia Figures & Facts Country’s code: LV Population’s ethnic composition: The name “Latvia” originates from an • 59.1 per cent Latvian, ancient Baltic (IndoEuropean) tribe, • 28.0 per cent Russian, i.e. the Latgalians (latgaпi, Latvian) • 12.9 per cent other nationalities. who formed the ethnic core of the Latvian people. State language: Latvian. Most com mon foreign languages: English, Geography: Latvia is situated on the Russian, and German. Eastern shores of the Baltic Sea and is composed of 4 historic regions, i.e. Capital City: Riga (731.8 th inhabi Vidzeme, Kurzeme, Latgale and tants). The city was founded in Zemgale. The highest point in the 1201. The city’s old part as a historic country – the hill Gaijzinsh, 311.5 and cultural centre is included into meters. The country’s climate is mod the UNESCO’s list of world cultural erate with slight temperature heritage. changes: summer is usually warm, with mild temperatures in spring and Other large towns and cities: autumn, though winters can be unex Daugavpils (117 th), Liepaja (97 th), pectedly cold. There could be occa Jelgava (71 th), Jurmala (59 th), and sional showers. Ventspils (47 th inhabitants). Area: 64,589 sq. km (24,937 sq. miles). Ports: There are three major ports in the country: Ventspils, Riga and Total national border length: 1,862 km Liepaja. Latvia borders Estonia on the south, Russia on the east, Belarus on the south Free Economic Zones: Riga Free Port, east and Lithuania on the south.
  • The Role of Latvian Ports Within Baltic Sea Region

    The Role of Latvian Ports Within Baltic Sea Region

    ISSN 1822–8402 EUROPEAN INTEGRATION STUDIES. 2013. No. 7 THE ROLE OF LATVIAN PORTS WITHIN BALTIC SEA REGION Astrida Rijkure, Inga Sare Latvian Maritime academy, Riga, Latvia e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.7.5145 Latvian ports play an important role in the national economy. Latvia has established itself as a transit country (mainly for the Russian, Central Asia and Belarus cargoes). Transit cargoes account for approximately 85% of the total volume of cargoes in the Latvian ports. The Latvian ports handle on average 60 million tons per year. The transportation and storage account for approximately 13% of the Latvian GDP, and the total revenues from transit cargoes account for approximately 4.4% of the GDP and are equal to 27.7% of the total volume of the export of services. Traditional competitors of the Latvian ports include Klaipeda, Tallinn, St. Petersburg and Primorsk ports. Also Ust-luga has joined the above list as it is developed rapidly by Russia. Thus, there is a threat that Russia might direct its cargoes to the ports of its own region by providing the sufficient capacity of its own ports. Therefore, it is necessary to pay special attention to the requalification of cargoes on the Latvian ports into the cargoes with high value added. The topicality of the issue of this research is determined by the current increased attention to the operation of the Latvian large ports, the efficiency of their operations and the competitiveness in comparison to other ports of the Baltic sea region, as well as the initiative of the European Commission regarding the review of the ports policy and their further operation on the European Union level.
  • Changes in Routes Drawing

    Changes in Routes Drawing

    “GREAT ROUTES IN THE MIDDLE AGE AND THEIR SYMBOLOGY” Nr. 2016-1-ES01-KA219-025035_3 CHANGES IN ROUTES DRAWING Artis Saušs , Latvia Trade in the territory of Latvia rapidly developed in the second half of the1st millennium, when the precious metal(silver, gold…) appeared in trade more and more. The Livonians and Latgallians used the Daugava and Gauja waterways to trade with the Eastern Slavs, but for the trade with the ancient Scotties and Scandinavians - the Baltic Sea. The furry, leather were mainly exported, but salt was gaining more importance in import (until the 2nd half of the 19th century salt and herring were the most important import goods in Latvia) TRADE In the14th century German traders in Rīga city removed the traders of other nationalities from Riga foreign trade. The privileges of German traders throughout Livonia were also strengthened by the Hanseatic League of German Trade Cities. Hanse traders used: Ventas waterway - in Kurzeme started near Ventspils un and was available for sea-going ships up to Ventas rumba near Kuldīga. Daugavas waterway - started at Rīgas port at the mouth of the river Rīdzene. The ancient Gaujas waterway - trough Turaida and Cēsis led to Tērbata, the Hanseatic time was mostly used as a land route for trade with Pskov and Novgorod cities. HANSEATIC LEAGUE TIMES In the13th-15th centuries forest products, fodder products and cereals were quite a bit exported, but in the 16th century the situation changed. The price revolution in Western Europe, triggered by the discovery of America, the economic and social processes in Europe, created favorable conditions for the export of Livonia's agricultural goods and timber.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    TRANSPORT SECTOR RESTRUCTURING IN THE BALTIC STATES Public Disclosure Authorized TOWARD EU ACCESSION Public Disclosure Authorized Proceedings of the 2nd Seminar held in Parnu on November 24-25, 2003 The Seminar was hosted by: The Estonian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Edited by Lauri Ojala, Tapio Naula and Cesar Queiroz March 2004 Public Disclosure Authorized The second seminar on transport sector restructuring was held in Parnu, Estonia, on November 24 and 25, 2003 to review recent progress in this field in each of the Baltic States and to discuss possibilities for further restructuring of their respective transport sectors in the near future. The seminar was a follow-up of the first seminar held in Riga in 2000. The proceedings reflect the significant progress that the Baltic States have made in modernizing their transport sectors over the past few years. The Governments of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania deserve to be congratulated for their achievements, which will help to promote economic growth in the region. The Governments of the three states participating in the seminar attached considerable importance to the topic, as reflected by the high level of their delegations, led by the respective Ministers of Transport and Communications. The EBRD, EIB, NIB and ECMT joined the World Bank at the Seminar, and made a significant intellectual contribution to the proceedings. TRANSPORT SECTOR RESTRUCTURING IN THE BALTIC STATES TOWARD EU ACCESSION Proceedings of the 2nd Seminar held in Parnu on November 24-25, 2003 The Seminar was hosted by: The Estonian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications The World Bank Edited by Lauri Ojala, Tapio Naula and Cesar Queiroz March 2004 2004 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.