Operational Challenges to Port Interfaces in the Multi-Modal Transport Chain (Maritime and Hinterland Connections)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Operational Challenges to Port Interfaces in the Multi-Modal Transport Chain (Maritime and Hinterland Connections) Operational Challenges to Port Interfaces in the Multi-modal Transport Chain (Maritime and Hinterland Connections) 2013 Table of contest Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 PART I EVALUATION OF THE EXISTING SITUATION .................................................... 5 1. Research methodology ....................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Setting the Criteria ....................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Selection of indicators ............................................................................................... 11 2. Latvian ports ..................................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Freeport of Riga ......................................................................................................... 22 2.2 Port of Liepaja ........................................................................................................... 33 2.3 Port of Ventspils ........................................................................................................ 38 3. Lithuanian ports ................................................................................................................ 43 3.2 Port of Klaip ėda ......................................................................................................... 44 4. Polish ports ....................................................................................................................... 58 4.2 Port of Gdansk ........................................................................................................... 59 4.3 Port of Gdynia ........................................................................................................... 75 4.4 Port of Elbl ąg ............................................................................................................. 91 5. German ports .................................................................................................................... 94 5.2 Port of Sassnitz .......................................................................................................... 95 6. Danish ports .................................................................................................................... 104 6.2 Port of Køge ............................................................................................................. 105 7. Estonian ports ................................................................................................................. 109 7.2 Port of Tallinn .......................................................................................................... 110 8. Russian ports .................................................................................................................. 121 8.1 Port of St. Petersburg ............................................................................................... 124 8.2 Port of Kaliningrad .................................................................................................. 142 9. Overview of port performance ....................................................................................... 151 9.1 Market trends and market structure indicators ........................................................ 152 9.2 Socio-economic impact indicators ........................................................................... 157 9.3 Environmental performance indicators ................................................................... 161 9.4 Logistic chain and operational performance indicators ........................................... 165 9.5 Governance indicators ............................................................................................. 170 9.6 Summary .................................................................................................................. 173 10. SWOT analysis of AC ports ....................................................................................... 176 2 References .............................................................................................................................. 181 PART II EXAMINATION OF GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES RELATED TO THE INTERMODAL CARGO TRANSPORTATION .................................................................. 184 Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 184 1. IT-system KIPIS ............................................................................................................. 186 2. Shuttle Train Viking ....................................................................................................... 189 3. Container block-train ZUBR .......................................................................................... 195 4. Railport Scandinavia ...................................................................................................... 197 5. Baltic Rail in Port of Gdynia .......................................................................................... 202 6. Muuga Industrial Park .................................................................................................... 207 7. Container Transferium Rotterdam.................................................................................. 211 8. Dry port Athus ................................................................................................................ 216 References .............................................................................................................................. 219 Annexes .................................................................................................................................. 221 PART III RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT IN AMBER COAST PORTS ................................................................................................................................... 229 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 229 Hub ports ................................................................................................................................ 230 1. Recommendations based on analysis of the existing situation and investigation of the “good examples” .................................................................................................................... 231 1.1 First group ................................................................................................................ 233 1.2 Second group ........................................................................................................... 235 1.3 Third group .............................................................................................................. 238 1.4 Fourth group ............................................................................................................ 241 1.5 Recommendations for implementing good practice examples ................................ 243 2. Recommendations based on intermodal cargo handling forecast for the period up to 2020 ........................................................................................................................................ 245 References .............................................................................................................................. 248 3 Introduction The subject of the current study is “Operational Challenges to Port Interfaces in the Multi- modal Transport Chain (Maritime and Hinterland Connections)” which consists of analysis of the operational aspects in the ports in the field of intermodal cargo transportation by: 1. evaluation of the existing situation; 2. examination of good practice examples related to the intermodal cargo transportation; 3. recommendations for further development in Amber Coast ports to become powerful hubs for intermodal cargo handling. The current study is concentrating on intermodal cargo transportation via Amber Coast ports. Intermodal cargo transportation is a multimodal transport of goods transported in one and the same intermodal transport unit by successive modes of transport without handling of the goods themselves when changing modes. Thus in general the subject of this study is operational aspects of transportation of containers, Ro-Ro units, swap-bodies etc. The study is focusing on all operations within the port that are directly related to maritime – land interface and intermodal cargo handling in transportation chain: vessel - terminal - mode of transportation. The study is examining the Amber Coast ports – Ferryport Sassnitz, Elblag, Klaipeda, Riga, Ventspils, Køge, associated ACL Project partner port of Kaliningrad and other ports connected to the Amber Coast such as Tallinn, Liepaja, Gdansk, Gdynia, and St. Petersburg. Figure 1. Amber Coast ports. 4 PART I EVALUATION OF THE EXISTING SITUATION 1. Research methodology The current study analyses of operational aspects in the ports in the field of intermodal cargo transportation. In order to evaluate the existing situation in Amber Coast ports, several research methods were used. The first step in evaluating of the existing situation was setting the criteria and creating indicators for assessing the
Recommended publications
  • Eskola Juho Makinen Jarno.Pdf (1.217Mt)
    Juho Eskola Jarno Mäkinen MERENKULKIJA Merenkulun koulutusohjelma Merikapteenin suuntautumisvaihtoehto 2014 MERENKULKIJA Eskola, Juho Mäkinen, Jarno Satakunnan ammattikorkeakoulu Merenkulun koulutusohjelma Merikapteenin suuntautumisvaihtoehto Toukokuu 2014 Ohjaaja: Teränen, Jarmo Sivumäärä: 126 Liitteitä: 3 Asiasanat: historia, komentosilta, slangi ja englanti, lastinkäsittely ja laivateoria, Meriteidensäännöt ja sopimukset, yleistä merenkulusta. ____________________________________________________________________ Opinnäytetyömme aiheena oli luoda merenkulun tietopeli, joka sai myöhemmin nimekseen Merenkulkija. Työmme sisältää 1200 sanallista kysymystä, ja 78 kuvakysymystä. Kysymysten lisäksi teimme pelille ohjeet ja pelilaudan, jotta Merenkulkija olisi mahdollisimman valmis ja ymmärrettävä pelattavaksi. Pelin sanalliset kysymykset on jaettu kuuteen aihealueeseen. Aihealueita ovat: historia, komentosilta, slangi ja englanti, lastinkäsittely ja laivateoria, meriteidensäännöit, lait ja sopimukset ja viimeisenä yleistä merenkulusta. Kuvakysymykset ovat sekalaisia. Merenkulkija- tietopeli on suunnattu merenkulun opiskelijoille, tarkemmin kansipuolen päällystöopiskelijoille. Toki kokeneemmillekin merenkulkijoille peli tarjoaa varmasti uutta tietoa ja palauttaa jo unohdettuja asioita mieleen. Merenkulkija- tietopeli soveltuu oppitunneille opetuskäyttöön, ja vapaa-ajan viihdepeliksi. MARINER Eskola, Juho Mäkinen, Jarno Satakunnan ammattikorkeakoulu, Satakunta University of Applied Sciences Degree Programme in maritime management May 2014 Supervisor:
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Nautical Terms: English – Japanese
    Glossary of Nautical Terms: English – Japanese 2 Approved and Released by: Dal Bailey, DIR-IdC United States Coast Guard Auxiliary Interpreter Corps http://icdept.cgaux.org/ 6/29/2012 3 Index Glossary of Nautical Terms: English ‐ Japanese A…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…..pages 4 ‐ 6 B……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……. pages 7 ‐ 18 C………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………...pages 19 ‐ 26 D……………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………..pages 27 ‐ 32 E……………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….…………. pages 33 ‐ 35 F……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….………..……pages 36 ‐ 41 G……………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………...…………pages 42 ‐ 43 H……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….………………..pages 49 ‐ 48 I…………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………….……….……... pages 49 ‐ 50 J…………………………….……..…………………………………………………………………………………………….………... page 51 K…………………………………………………………………………………………………….….…………..………………………page 52 L…………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………….……..pages 53 ‐ 58 M…………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………....….. pages 59 ‐ 62 N……………….........................................................................…………………………………..…….. pages 63 ‐ 64 O……………………………………..........................................................................…………….…….. pages 65 ‐ 67 P……………………….............................................................................................................. pages 68 ‐ 74 Q………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….……...…… page 75 R………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….…………..
    [Show full text]
  • ZEEBRIEF#179 12 Juni 2021 Nieuwsbrief 281
    DUTCH FAITH ZEEBRIEF#179 12 juni 2021 Nieuwsbrief 281 DUTCH FAITH, IMO 9112882, foto: Theo Keizer/HP, 10 mei 2021 t.h.v. het Lage Licht, voor de laatste keer als DUTCH FAITH vertrokken van Moerdijk op weg naar Turkije. ALASKABORG (1), IMO 9429962 (NB-276), 23-1-2009 te water gelaten, 31-3-2009 opgeleverd door Hudong-Zhonghua Shipbuilding Co. Ltd., Shanghai (1537A) aan Alaskaborg B.V., Delfzijl, in beheer bij Wagenborg Shipping B.V., Delfzijl. Roepsein PBQR, 11.864 GT. 3-4-2009 vertrokken van Shanghai op de 1e reis, te Phu My, Vietnam windmolens en toebehoren geladen met bestemming Searsport, Maine, U.S.A. 2011 (LR) verkocht aan José María España Ltd., Panama, in beheer bij Bernhard Schulte Shipmanagement (Cyprus) Ltd., roepsein H3WB, 18-7-2011 gearriveerd in de IJmondhaven te IJmuiden, 28-7-2011 te IJmuiden herdoopt JOSÉ MARÍA ESPAÑA. 30-7-2011 vanaf IJmuiden gearriveerd in de Wiltonhaven te Schiedam. 9-4-2013 (e) in beheer bij Bernhard Schulte Shipmanagement (Cyprus) Ltd. en Hanseatic Consultoria Naval C.A., Caracas. 4-2013 (e) vlag: Venezuela, roepsein YYMO. 6-8-2016 (e) in beheer bij Thorco Shipmanagement B.V., Winschoten, 8-2016 (e) vlag: Panama, roepsein (H3WB). 17-4- 2018 in beheer bij Jose Maria España Ltd., Tortola en Atlas Marine Shipmanagement C.A., Caracas. 1-8- 2019 vlag: onbekend (Zonder Vlagstaat). (2020 vlag: Venezuela is fout). (Foto: Marcel Coster, 25-7-2011, IJmuiden). ASTRORUNNER, IMO 9349227 (NB-135), 28-7-2006 casco’s van de ASTRORUNNER en ASTROSPRINTER gearriveerd achter de sleepboot SUMATRAS in de Merwehaven te Rotterdam, 22-9-2006 gearriveerd bij Olthof's Machinefabriek te Capelle a/d IJssel voor afbouw, voor de proefvaart de Nederlandse vlag (PIZV) gehad, 3-2007 vanwege een charter bij het Zweedse TransAtlantic de naam gewijzigd in TRANSJORUND, 2007 opgeleverd door IDHA (224) aan Astrorunner G.m.b.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry in Poland with Special Attention to the Region of the Pomeranian Young Moraine
    AFSV Forstwirtschaft und Standortkartierung Waldoekologie online Heft 2 Seite 49 - 58 9 Fig., 2 Tab. Freising, Oktober 2005 Forestry in Poland with special attention to the region of the Pomeranian Young Moraine Marcin S z y d l a r s k i Abstract In the year 2004 the ASFV celebrated its 50th anniversary holding a conference in Sulęczyno, Kartuzy. This event offered the possibility to give an actual overview of forest resources and forest functions in Poland. The excursions of the meeting focused on the fascinating, diversified forest landscape formed by the Pomeranian phase of the Baltic glaciation. The Kartuzy Forest District is situated in the heart of the Kashubian Lakeland and the moraine hills. The landscape is not only characterized by the natural occurrence of Baltic beech forests but also by high diversity of soils and meso- and microclimatic de- viations providing habitats for rare plant species, including some plants typical of mountain regions. The tree species combination of the District is formed by pine, spruce, and beech. The oldest parts of the forests are legally protected as nature reserves. I. POLISH FOREST RESOURCES At the end of the 18th century the Polish forest area comprised about 40%, nowadays forests in Po- land cover approximately 8,942,000 hectares, which is 28.6% of an overall country area. According to international standards (FAO Forestry Department) and tests on economic forestry areas, the wooded area in Poland comprises more than 9,040,000 hectares, which is as many as 30% forest cover and is close to Central European average (www.fao.org/forestry/site/18308/en/pol).
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Baltica Global Project Cost- Benefit Analysis Final Report
    Rail Baltica Global Project Cost- Benefit Analysis Final Report 30 April 2017 x Date Table of contents Table of contents ........................................................................................................................ 2 Version ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Terms and Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... 3 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 EY work context ................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Context of the CBA ............................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Key constraints and considerations of the analysis ................................................................ 6 3. Background and information about the project ....................................................................... 8 3.1 Project background and timeline ......................................................................................... 8 3.2 Brief description of the project ........................................................................................... 9 4. Methodology ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • “Market Potential and Competition Analysis for Selected Ports of the Amber Coast”
    “Market Potential and Competition Analysis for selected ports of the Amber Coast” Final Report Riga, 2/04/2013 Client: Freeport of Ventspils Authority Prepared by: SIA "NK Konsultāciju birojs" Market Potential and Competition Analysis for selected ports of the Amber Coast Final Report, date: 02/04/2013 SIA "NK Konsultāciju birojs" Contacts: Mūkusalas street 42 Normunds Lukša LV 1004 Riga E-mail: [email protected] Latvia Direct phone: +371 29-115484 Phone: +371 67-609490 Fax: +371 67-609491 www.nkconsulting.lv Report prepared by: Tobias Merten Vladas Stūrys Normunds Lukša Page 2 of 122 Market Potential and Competition Analysis for selected ports of the Amber Coast Final Report, date: 02/04/2013 Notice This report has been prepared by SIA "NK konsultāciju birojs" (NK) with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating NK’s General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the manpower and resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. NK disclaims any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. NK undertakes no obligation to notify recipients of events occurring after the date on the front cover that might change the content or conclusion of this report. In preparing this report NK has used data from both its own internal databases and from third party sources, and has also interviewed representatives of the business community. NK can accept no liability for the accuracy of data sourced in good faith from third-party sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Nautical Terms & References
    Canadian Coast Guard Auxiliary Search & Rescue Crew Manual GLOSSARY OF NAUTICAL TERMS & REFERENCES Glossary of Nautical Terms 245 Bearing – The direction in which an object lies A with respect to the reference direction. Bearing, Collision – A set of bearings taken on a Abaft – In a direction towards the stern. converging vessel in order to determine if a danger of collision exists. Abeam – On the beam; a direction at right angles to the keel. Bearing, Compass – A bearing relative to the Ship’s Compass North. Aboard – In or on board the vessel. Bearing, Magnetic – A bearing relative to the Afloat – A vessel totally supported by water and Magnetic North. off the bottom. Bearing, Relative – A bearing relative to the ship’s Aft – At or towards the stern. heading or bow of the vessel. Ahead – In the direction of the vessel’s head or Bearing, Ring – A ring fitted over a compass and bow. equipped with sighting lines for observing Aid to Navigation – A device or object, external to compass bearings. the vessel, located to assist in safe navigation. It Bearing, True – A bearing relative to True North. may be natural, a man-made structure or object. Beating – The procedure of sailing or running to Air Accident – A SAR Incident where the original windward with alternate tacks across the wind. vehicle of transportation of the persons involved was an airborne vehicle, regardless of Belay – To make fast a rope on a cleat by taking where the vehicle came to rest. turns. Amidships – In the middle of the ship, whether Bifurcation Buoy – A buoy that marks where a longitudinally or laterally.
    [Show full text]
  • AFRAMAX Tanker Design
    The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME) Greek Section – Technical Meeting 15. March 2012, Athens HOLISTIC SHIP DESIGN OPTIMISATION: Theory and Applications by Apostolos Papanikolaou National Technical University of Athens - NTUA Ship Design Laboratory – SDL http://www.naval.ntua.gr/sdl A. Papanikolaou HOLISTIC SHIP DESIGN OPTIMISATION 1 List of contents 1. Introduction to Holistic Ship Design Optimisation • Important Design Optimization Notions • Holistic Optimisation Methodology 2. Optimization of RoPax ships – Case study • Projects ROROPROB (2000-2003) and EPAN-MET4 (2004-2007) 3. Optimisation of High-Speed vessels • Project FLOWMART (2000-2003) 4. Holistic Optimisation of Tanker Ships – Projects SAFEDOR and BEST (2005-2011) • Multi-objective Optimization of Tanker Ships • Case study-reference ship • Alternative configurations • Discussion of results 5. Conclusions- The Way Ahead A. Papanikolaou HOLISTIC SHIP DESIGN OPTIMISATION 2 Important Design Optimization Notions (1) • Holism (from Greek όλος, meaning entire, total)-holistic The properties of a system cannot be determined or explained by looking at its component parts alone; instead of, the system as a whole determines decisively how the part components behave or perform. “The whole is more than the sum of the parts” (Aristotle Metaphysics) • Reductionism-reduction: is sometimes interpreted as the opposite of holism. “A complex system can be approached by reduction to its fundamental parts” • Holism and reductionism need, for proper account of complex systems, to be regarded as complementary approaches to system analysis. • Systemic and analytical approaches are also complementary and strongly related to holism and reductionism • Risk (financial): “A quantifiable likelihood of loss or of less-than-expected returns” • Risk (general): “A quantifiable likelihood of loss of an acceptable state or of a worse-than-expected state condition” • Safety: may be defined as “An acceptable state of risk” A.
    [Show full text]
  • Panama Canal Expansion Impacts on Fleet Patterns and Challenges in Terminal Design Presented by Michael Horton, C
    Panama Canal Expansion Impacts on Fleet Patterns and Challenges in Terminal Design Presented by Michael Horton, C. Eng, P.E. Agenda • Panama Canal Expansion, the Coming Fleet – Fleet Vessel size – Container Vessel Size • Design Criteria , Present & Future – Terminal Requirements for the Future – Options for Berth Construction • Challenges, Moving Forward – Time – Money • Conclusions The New Generation Source: ACP Ready or Not? In 1995 the Regina Maersk was big at 6,500 TEU – 5,800 trucks – 25 barges – 550 cargo planes Regina Maersk (1995) Now We Have the Emma Maersk at 11,000 or 13,000TEUs Emma Maersk (2006) But Still Not The Biggest Vessel On The Water Typical Maritime Transport Costs Source: Delft University, “Containerization International Charter Market Report”, Drewry Container Market Review 2006-2007. Container Ship Dimensions by Capacity (averages) Capacity Draft LOA Beam (TEUs) (m) (m) (m) 2,000-2,999 11.6 239 31.5 3,000-3,999 12.1 259 32.4 4,000-4,999 13.0 284 33.2 5,000-5,999 13.7 281 39.0 6,000-6,999 13.9 302 40.6 7,000-7,999 14.6 343 42.6 8,000-8,999 14.3 329 42.8 9,000-9,999 14.7 344 44.0 >10,000 15.5 398 56.4 Immediate Demand (ECSA carrier) • (2010) - 6,300 TEUS: – Length: 300 Meters – Beam: 40 Meters – Draft: 14.5 Meters – DWT: 76,000 • (2014) - 8,800 TEUS: – Length: 338 Meters – Beam: 46 Meters – Draft: 15.5 Meters – DWT: 116,000 Vessel Size: Conclusion • Panama Canal sets the new top end? • Vessel size will be a factor of route, market potential and facilities availability • With or without the Canal expansion, terminal
    [Show full text]
  • Ztráta Soběstačnosti ČR V Oblasti Černého Uhlí: Ohrožení Energetické Bezpečnosti? Bc. Ivo Vojáček
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA FAKULTA SOCIÁLNÍCH STUDIÍ Katedra mezinárodních vztahů a evropských studií Obor Mezinárodní vztahy a energetická bezpečnost Ztráta soběstačnosti ČR v oblasti černého uhlí: ohrožení energetické bezpečnosti? Diplomová práce Bc. Ivo Vojáček Vedoucí práce: PhDr. Tomáš Vlček, Ph.D. UČO: 363783 Obor: MVEB Imatrikulační ročník: 2014 Petrovice u Karviné 2016 Prohlášení o autorství práce Čestně prohlašuji, že jsem diplomovou práci na téma Ztráta soběstačnosti ČR v oblasti černého uhlí: ohrožení energetické bezpečnosti? vypracoval samostatně a výhradně s využitím zdrojů uvedených v seznamu použité literatury. V Petrovicích u Karviné, dne 22. 5. 2016 ……………………. Bc. Ivo Vojáček 2 Poděkování Na tomto místě bych rád poděkoval svému vedoucímu PhDr. Tomáši Vlčkovi, Ph.D. za ochotu, se kterou mi po celou dobu příprav práce poskytoval cenné rady a konstruktivní kritiku. Dále chci poděkovat své rodině za podporu, a zejména svým rodičům za nadlidskou trpělivost, jež se mnou měli po celou dobu studia. V neposlední řadě patří můj dík i všem mým přátelům, kteří mé studium obohatili o řadu nezapomenutelných zážitků, škoda jen, že si jich nepamatuju víc. 3 Láska zahřeje, ale uhlí je uhlí. (Autor neznámý) 4 Obsah 1 Úvod .................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Vědecká východiska práce ................................................................................................ 10 2.2 Metodologie ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In the Baltic States
    SEAPORTS IN THE BALTIC STATES FLANDERS INVESTMENT & TRADE MARKET SURVEY Seaport in the Baltic States December 2017 Thomas Castrel, Vlaams economisch vertegenwoordiger Flanders Investment & Trade Gedimino Prospektas 20 LT-01103 Vilnius Lithuania [email protected] Seaports in the Baltic States, 2017 1 Table of Content Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Klaipėda State Seaport ............................................................................................................................ 5 Overview ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Activities ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Connectivity and advantages ............................................................................................................. 7 Cargo volume & structure .................................................................................................................. 8 Klaipėda port expansion and dredging 2018-2022 .......................................................................... 10 Port of Liepāja ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Overview .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Die Spätpleistozäne Bis Frühholozäne Beckenentwicklung in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern - Untersuchungen Zur Stratigraphie, Geomorphologie Und Geoar- Chäologie
    GREIFSWALDER GEOGRAPHISCHE ARBEITEN ___________________________________________________________________________ Geographisches Institut der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald Band 24 Die spätpleistozäne bis frühholozäne Beckenentwicklung in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern - Untersuchungen zur Stratigraphie, Geomorphologie und Geoar- chäologie von Knut Kaiser GREIFSWALD 2001 _______________________________________________________________________ ERNST-MORITZ-ARNDT-UNIVERSITÄT GREIFSWALD Impressum ISBN: 3-86006-183-6 Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald Herausgabe: Konrad Billwitz Redaktion: Knut Kaiser Layout: Knut Kaiser Grafik: Petra Wiese, Knut Kaiser Herstellung: Vervielfältigungsstelle der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, KIEBU-Druck Greifswald Kontakt: Dr. Knut Kaiser, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Geographisches Institut, Jahnstraße 16, D-17487 Greifswald, e-mail: [email protected] ________________________________________________________________________________________ Für den Inhalt ist der Autor verantwortlich. Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort 5 1. Einführung 7 1.1 Allgemeines 7 1.2 Spezielle Fragestellungen 8 2. Methodik 11 2.1 Geländearbeiten 11 2.2 Laborarbeiten 12 3. Paläoklimatische, stratigraphische und paläogeographische Grundlagen 15 3.1 Spätpleistozäne bis frühholozäne Klimaentwicklung im nördlichen Mitteleuropa 15 3.2 Regionale Stratigraphie und Paläogeographie 16 3.2.1 Stratigraphie 16 3.2.2 Paläogeographie 18 3.3 Regionale Radiokohlenstoffdaten 20 3.3.1 Allgemeines 20 3.3.2 Datenvorlage 22 3.3.3 Auswertung 24
    [Show full text]