Public Participation in Urban Development: Case Studies from Cincinnati, Ohio

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Participation in Urban Development: Case Studies from Cincinnati, Ohio Public participation in urban development: Case studies from Cincinnati, Ohio A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Geography of the College of Arts and Sciences by Susan L. Jakubowski B.A. Washington and Jefferson College M.A. University of Cincinnati 25 March 2014 Committee Chair: Colleen McTague, Ph.D. ii Abstract Public participation, a means by which citizens can influence local government in the decision making process, is commonly employed in American cities. Public participation is conceptualized as a significant element of democracy and as such, it is subject to impact in both practice and theory by changes in political ideology. Using three case studies of public participation in urban development projects in Cincinnati, Ohio, this research explores the way that participation strategies have evolved along with and in response to changes in political ideology. The results of these studies are then evaluated within a historical theoretical framework of public participation and indicate that contemporary strategies may not be adequately accounted for by traditional theorizations of participation. The results further indicate that concepts such as empowerment and the public should be expanded within the participatory framework to include the more recent ways in which they have manifested. iii Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Unifying Themes 9 Chapter 3: Marching to the beat of a silent drum: Wasted consensus-building and failed neighborhood participatory planning 19 Chapter 4: Saving the streetcar: Neighborhood organization, protest, and successful protection of an urban transportation project 59 Chapter 5: In my backyard: Empowered public participation in a rails-to-trails development project 88 Chapter 6: Conclusion 112 Works Cited 118 iv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Statement of the problem The ‘participatory turn’ can be used to characterize the nature of urban development that has been occurring for over a decade (Krivy and Kaminer, 2013). This turn, characterized by an increased involvement of the public in the decision making processes of urban development, is both a reaction to and a reflection of broader shifts in the political ideologies governing contemporary urban policy making. Contemporary participatory strategies are tied historically to the strategies that developed in the 1960s under radical, reactionary, and anti-statist ideologies (Krivy and Kaminer, 2013). Since that time there has been significant shift in government policies towards governance, those processes which rely on market competition for the allocation of resources and which rely on networks with non-governmental actors such as the private corporate sector and the public citizenry to make decisions and implement policy (Tickell and Peck, 1996). Governance evolved out of neoliberal economic policies including devolution, privatization, and retrenchment and these policies carved out new entrepreneurial roles for American cities. The impact that this political shift had on public participation is ambiguous. One group of participation theorists argue that governance allows for more opportunities for public participation due to its collaborative nature and reliance on non-governmental partners (Denters and Rose, 2005; Osborne and Gaebler, 1992). The concern for this group is that the participation be useful and authentic and not merely posturing (King et al., 1998). Another camp, however, argues that contemporary participatory strategies have been divorced from these radical ideologies as well as any other significant and meaningful political ideologies and that instead these strategies have been rendered impotent 1 within the reigning sociopolitical context of neoliberalism (Beaumont and Loopman, 2008). Much attention has been given to how shifts in ideology in politics in general has impacted the nature of participation, but little has been given to how strategies have reacted to and evolved as a result of these changes. Not paying attention to contemporary strategies has resulted in theory lagging behind practice, exposing voids in the use of theory to account for these strategies within its existing conceptualizations. This research addresses that theoretical void by examining several current examples of public participation strategies and identifying the areas in which existing theory is unable to account for these strategies. A conceptual examination of the role of power in public participation is the main theme that unifies the three case studies that make up this research. Case studies The research that comprises this dissertation examines the state of public participation in urban development in Cincinnati, Ohio. Three case studies are presented and then evaluated within the existing theoretical literature. Each of the case studies is presented in an article formatted for submission to a peer-reviewed academic journal in partial fulfillment of the degree requirements for the Department of Geography. The first case study examines the outcome of the participatory planning process that was used to create the 2002 Over-the-Rhine Comprehensive Plan. In that case, the planning process was very intensive and inclusive and produced a document that 2 created specific goals that reflected the input of participants. One of the goals of the plan called for specific amounts of housing to be developed over specific time periods in order to avoid the displacement of existing residents that many feared would happen with reinvestment into the area. Though satisfied with the goals, over time, participants were less and less satisfied with the results of the development due to the fact that no method for monitoring progress had been instituted, though it was specifically called for within the plan itself. In other words, it was unclear whether the goals were being met or not. In this pilot study, we created and tested a GIS based system to monitor progress on the housing goals and showed that progress could in fact be monitored. From this, we concluded that a participatory plan that creates specific goals but then does not monitor progress toward those goals renders the participatory process unsuccessful and powerless. The second case study examines the role that public participation played in the final stages of the decision making process that determined the fate of the Cincinnati streetcar project. Construction of the streetcar system began in 2012 though the project had been in the works for many years before that. The project began under the direction of then Mayor Mark Mallory despite the fact that consensus on the project was never achieved, neither within the city government nor the public. The main issues of contention were how the project would be funded for construction and operation and whether it was a viable engine for economic growth. The debate dominated the November 2013 election at which time it seemed an anti-streetcar city council had been elected and it was expected that this would obviously lead to the discontinuation of the project. The fate of the project came down to a final vote by City Council in December 3 of 2013 when the project was saved due to the swing votes of two council members. The next day the Cincinnati Enquirer proclaimed “Streetcar has engaged citizens to thank” (Andrews, 2013). Just days after the municipal election, a group of concerned citizens had formed a grass roots organization, Believe in Cincinnati, which sought to influence the outcome of the project. These citizens undertook a fast moving campaign in which they sought to organize a large, visible group of supporters of the project. They collected signatures for a charter amendment to continue the project and worked with council members and members of the corporate community to address the funding issues that were the concerns of council members. The participatory actions of this citizen group were successful in impacting a major urban development decision; however, the nature of the group, the types of participants and the actions undertaken by them do not reflect the typical way that these concepts are developed in participatory literature. The third case study examines the participatory strategy of a grass roots organization that is seeking to convert an abandoned train rail line into a multi-use recreational trail. This project, the Wasson Way project, was started in 2011 by an individual citizen who gathered public support via a door-to-door campaign and by addressing local neighborhood groups and retail merchants. He then presented the project to members of Cincinnati’s City Council and gained support among its members. His organization was incorporated as a non-profit with a Board of Directors and eventually evolved into an organized group with specific committees to address and carry out the many activities of the group. The group, with over 3000 supporters as of 2014, utilizes social media such as Facebook and a website to update its members of 4 the progress of the project, to inform members of upcoming activities, and to link the project to other relevant topics, such as healthcare, child safety, the national Rails-to- Trails movement, alternative transportation and concerns for property values in order to expand the support base for the project. At the time of this paper, the project was still in progress with the City working to secure the right-of-way necessary to begin construction.
Recommended publications
  • E-Participation: a Quick Overview of Recent Qualitative Trends
    DESA Working Paper No. 163 ST/ESA/2020/DWP/163 JANUARY 2020 E-participation: a quick overview of recent qualitative trends Author: David Le Blanc ABSTRACT This paper briefly takes stock of two decades of e-participation initiatives based on a limited review of the academic literature. The purpose of the paper is to complement the results of the e-government Survey 2020. As such, the emphasis is on aspects that the e-government survey (based on analysis of e-government portals and on quantitative indicators) does not capture directly. Among those are the challenges faced by e-participation initiatives and key areas of attention for governments. The paper maps the field of e-par- ticipation and related activities, as well as its relationships with other governance concepts. Areas of recent development in terms of e-participation applications are briefly reviewed. The paper selectively highlights conclusions from the literature on different participation tools, as well as a list of key problematic areas for policy makers. The paper concludes that while e-participation platforms using new technologies have spread rapidly in developed countries in the first decade of the 2000s and in developing countries during the last 10 years, it is not clear that their multiplication has translated into broader or deeper citizen participation. Be- yond reasons related to technology access and digital skills, factors such as lack of understanding of citizens’ motivations to participate and the reluctance of public institutions to genuinely share agenda setting and decision-making power seem to play an important role in the observed limited progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Cincinnati Fundraisers and Incumbents Win
    Top Cincinnati fundraisers and incumbents win For immediate release October 23, 2002 Contact Catherine Turcer, (513) 221-2100 CINCINNATI -- The top fundraising candidates for Mayor and Cincinnati City Council won in 2001, according to a report released today by Ohio Citizen Action. The winning candidate for Mayor, incumbent Charlie Luken, raised 3.9 times more than his three challengers. All of the incumbent candidates also won in 2001. The average incumbent raised 3.7 times more than the average non-incumbent. "Contributions don’t necessarily make victory more likely," said Catherine Turcer, campaign reform director for Ohio Citizen Action. "Often, favor-seekers contribute to a candidate precisely because their victory at the polls is already a foregone conclusion. They want to curry favor with someone who can reciprocate after the election." "Cincinnati’s old campaign financing system, however," Turcer said, "is clearly stacked against challengers and less well-funded candidates." Contribution totals were similar during 1997 ($2,322,158), 1999 ($2,421,109) and 2001 ($2,461,993), according to a report released today by Ohio Citizen Action. 1997 contribution limits, however, changed the giving patterns. The 1997 limits restricted labor unions and Political Action Committees (PACs) and individual limits led some to use family members to inflate contributions. "Cincinnati campaign contributions study," (70 KB .doc). ​ ​ 2001 campaign finance profiles, (13 KB .doc): ● Mayoral candidates: Charlie Luken, Courtis Fuller, William Brodberger, Michael Riley. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ● Winning candidates for Cincinnati City Council: Paul Booth, Minette Cooper, John ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Cranley, David Crowley, Pat DeWine, Chris Monzel, David Pepper, Alicia Reece, Jim ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Tarbell. ​ ● Losing candidates for Cincinnati City Council: Jane Anderson, Ken Anderson, Toni ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Andrews, Theophilas Barnes, Lawra Baumann, Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Revised Framework for Participatory Planning in the Context of Risk
    sustainability Article Towards a Revised Framework for Participatory Planning in the Context of Risk Paola Rizzi 1,* and Anna Por˛ebska 2 1 Department of Architecture, Design and Urban Planning, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy 2 Faculty of Architecture, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Kraków, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 April 2020; Accepted: 7 July 2020; Published: 9 July 2020 Abstract: Community participation is widely acknowledged to be crucial in both mitigation and reconstruction planning, as well as in community-based disaster risk reduction (CBDRR) and community-based disaster mitigation (CBDM) processes. However, despite decades of experience, an efficient framework that is acceptable for all actors and suitable for all different phases of the process—ranging from planning to post-disaster recovery—is lacking. The examples presented in this paper shed light on the different dynamics of participatory design processes and compare situations in which participatory design and community planning were introduced before, during, or after a disastrous or potentially disastrous event. Others emphasize the consequences of participation not being introduced at all. Analysis of these processes allows the authors to speculate on a revised, universal model for participatory planning in vulnerable territories and in the context of risk. By emphasizing intrinsic relations of different elements of the process, particularly the responsibility that different actors are prepared—or forced—to take, this article offers insight towards a framework for post-2020 participatory planning. Keywords: participatory design; design for risk reduction (DRR); disaster mitigation (DM); risk awareness; resilience 1. Introduction 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME Participatory Planning in Education. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris (France). OECD
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 107 653 SP 009 280 TITLE Participatory Planning in Education. INSTITUTION Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris (France). PUB DATE 74 NOTE 369p. AVAILABLE FROMOECD Publications Center, Suite 1207, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.V., Washington, D.C. 20006 ($13.50) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$18.40 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Educational Coordination; Educational Needs; *Educational Planning; *Educational Policy; *Educational Strategies; Foreign Countries; Participation; School Planning ABSTRACT This three-part book is part ofa series exploring educational policy planning, published by theOrganization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)Education Committee. The articles in this collectivn resulting froma January 1973 conference, focus on pedagogical and organizationaldimensions. The first part of the book presentsa review of the conference discussions, as well as its agenda andan orientation paper on participatory planning. Part two consists ofpapers which report experiments in participation and planning from thefield, with examples ranging from specific institutions to thenational level. The papers in part three, also basedon fieldwork, emphasize conceptual developments which suggest how planning mightbe seen as a participatory process. (Author/PB) PARTICIPATORY PLANNING IN EDUCATION HEALTH. US DEPROITMENT OP IIIMPCATION I WILPARS PERMISSION TU REPRODUCE THIS COPY- NE1714AL 'willow*, RIGHTED MATERIAL AS SEEN GRANTED BY EDUCATION SEEN REPRO THIS DOCUMENT HASRECEIVEO FR Duce° EXACTLY AS ORIGINGIN
    [Show full text]
  • Who Rules Cincinnati?
    Who Rules Cincinnati? A Study of Cincinnati’s Economic Power Structure And its Impact on Communities and People By Dan La Botz Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Published by Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Copyright ©2008 by Dan La Botz Table of Contents Summary......................................................................................................... 1 Preface.............................................................................................................4 Introduction.................................................................................................... 7 Part I - Corporate Power in Cincinnati.........................................................15 Part II - Corporate Power in the Media and Politics.....................................44 Part III - Corporate Power, Social Classes, and Communities......................55 Part IV - Cincinnati: One Hundred Years of Corporate Power.....................69 Discussion..................................................................................................... 85 Bibliography.................................................................................................. 91 Acknowledgments.........................................................................................96 About the Author...........................................................................................97 Summary This investigation into Cincinnati’s power structure finds that a handful of national and multinational corporations dominate
    [Show full text]
  • U R B a N LIFE And
    URBAN LIFE and URBAN LANDSCAPE SERIES CINCINNATI'S OVER-THE-RHINE AND TWENTIETH-CENTURY URBANISM Zane L. Miller and Bruce Tucker OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS Columbus Copyright © 1998 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Miller, Zane L. Changing plans for America's inner cities : Cincinnati's Over-The-Rhine and twentieth-century urbanism / Zane L. Miller and Bruce Tucker. p. cm. — (Urban life and urban landscape series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8142-0762-6 (cloth : alk. paper).—ISBN 0-8142-0763-4 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Urban renewal—Ohio—Cincinnati—History. 2. Over-the-Rhine (Cincinnati, Ohio)—History. I. Tucker, Bruce, 1948­ . 11. Title. III. Series. HT177.C53M55 1997 307.3'416'0977178—dc21 97-26206 CIP Text and jacket design by Gary Gore. Type set in ITC New Baskerville by Wilsted & Taylor Publishing Services. Printed by Thomson-Shore. The paper in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48-1992. 98765432 1 For Henry List of Illustrations ix Acknowledgments xi Introduction: Why Cincinnati, Why Over-the-Rhine? xv Prologue: 1850s-1910s 1 PART ONE ZONING, RAZING, OR REHABILITATION Introduction: From Cultural Engineering to Cultural Individualism 9 1 Social Groups, Slums, and Comprehensive Planning, 1915-1944 13 2 Neighborhoods and a Community, 1948-1960 29 PART TWO NEW VISIONS AND VISIONARIES Introduction: Community Action and
    [Show full text]
  • SWARTSELL-MASTERSREPORT-2013.Pdf (346.7Kb)
    DISCLAIMER: This document does not meet current format guidelines Graduate School at the The University of Texas at Austin. of the It has been published for informational use only. The Report Committee for Nikolas R Swartsell Certifies that this is the approved version of the following report: Turning the City Inside Out Shifting Demographics in American Cities APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: William Minutaglio Co-Supervisor: Robert Jensen Turning the City Inside Out Shifting Demographics in American Cities by Nikolas R. Swartsell, B.A. Report Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin May 2013 ii Abstract Turning the City Inside Out Shifting Demographics in American Cities Nikolas R. Swartsell, M.A. The University of Texas at Austin, 2013 Supervisor: William Minutaglio Narratives around many of America's inner-city neighborhoods have changed significantly in the past decade. Once portrayed by the media and pop-culture as blighted, dangerous areas to be avoided, these neighborhoods have become hip epicenters of a new philosophy in urban planning-- "place-making," a concept popularized by economist and urbanist Richard Florida. Place-making claims to be a kinder, friendlier kind of urban renewal emphasizing tolerance and diversity-- but is this the case? Through both physical changes and city-lead branding efforts, place-making seeks to draw young professionals, specifically those in the rising "creative class," to inner city areas in hopes these young workers will in turn draw employers.
    [Show full text]
  • Xavier Newswire Volume XCV Published Since 1915 by the Students of Xavier University Issue 10
    Xavier University Exhibit All Xavier Student Newspapers Xavier Student Newspapers 2009-10-28 Xavier University Newswire Xavier University (Cincinnati, Ohio) Follow this and additional works at: https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/student_newspaper Recommended Citation Xavier University (Cincinnati, Ohio), "Xavier University Newswire" (2009). All Xavier Student Newspapers. 574. https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/student_newspaper/574 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Xavier Student Newspapers at Exhibit. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Xavier Student Newspapers by an authorized administrator of Exhibit. For more information, please contact [email protected]. October 28, 2009 XAVIER NEWSWIRE Volume XCV Published since 1915 by the students of Xavier University Issue 10 AlwaYS ONLINE: xavier.edu/ BASKETBALL PREVIEW newswire inside Eight pages of coverage on the upcoming men’s and women’s season @ Sustainability Day focuses on Xavier’s environmental commitment, actions BY SARAH WIETEN University Chicago, spoke on the ed remarks from President Fr. Campus News Editor unique sustainability efforts her Michael Graham, S.J., who noted campus has undertaken, including how far the university had come Sustainability Day, took place a program to power their shuttle but that more work could be yesterday October 27th in Cintas system with biodiesel created from done in the field of sustainabil- Center in front of an audience of vegetable oil waste from their din- ity especially in light of the new over 100 students and about
    [Show full text]
  • History & Theory of Planning
    History and Theory of Planning Why do we do what we do? What is planning? a universal human activity involving the consideration of outcomes before choosing amongst alternatives a deliberate, self-conscious activity School of City and Regional Planning, Georgia Tech Primary functions of planning improve efficiency of outcomes optimize counterbalance market failures balance public and private interests widen the range of choice enhance consciousness of decision making civic engagement expand opportunity and understanding in community School of City and Regional Planning, Georgia Tech What is the role of history and theory in understanding planning? planning is rooted in applied disciplines primary interest in practical problem solving early planning theories emerged out of practice planning codified as a professional activity originally transmitted by practitioners via apprenticeships efforts to develop a coherent theory emerged in the 1950s and 60s need to rationalize the interests and activities of planning under conditions of social foment the social sciences as a more broadly based interpretive lens School of City and Regional Planning, Georgia Tech Types of theories theories of system operations How do cities, regions, communities, etc. work? • disciplinary knowledge such as economics and environmental science theories of system change How might planners act? • disciplinary knowledge such as decision theory, political science, and negotiation theory • applied disciplines such as public administration and engineering School of City
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Jul 2 0 1978
    PARTICIPATORY DESIGN, TIME AND CONTINUITY: The Case of Place By Nicolas John Messervy B.Arch., Carnegie-Mellon University 1972 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Architecture in Advanced Studies and Master of City Planning at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June, 1978 i A Signature of the Author Department of Urban Studies and Plannin'g 6 May 30, 1978 Certified by i Kevin Lyncl% Professor of City Design Thesis Supervisor Accepted by AssocifVe Professor Ralph Gakenheimer, Chairman Departmental Committee on Graduate Students Copyright 0 Nicolas John Messervy MASSACHUTSETS INSTITUTE OF TECHiNOLOGY JUL 2 0 1978 URARIES Room 14-0551 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Ph: 617.253.2800 MITL'ibrries Email: [email protected] Document Services http://libraries.mit.eduldocs DISCLAIMER OF QUALITY Due to the condition of the original material, there are unavoidable flaws in this reproduction. We have made every effort possible to provide you with the best copy available. If you are dissatisfied with this product and find it unusable, please contact Document Services as soon as possible. Thank you. The images contained in this document are of the best quality available. ii. PARTICIPATORY DESIGN, TINE AND CONTINUITY: The Case of Place By Nicolas John Messervy Submitted to the Departments of Urban Studies and Planning and Architecture on May 30, 1978, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of City Planning and Master of Architecture in Advanced Studies. Abstract This thesis considers the influence of "time" and "continuity" on citizen participation efforts and suggests ways in which participatory planning models might be al-.
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Rural Spatial Planning Based on a Virtual Globe-Based 3D PGIS
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article Participatory Rural Spatial Planning Based on a Virtual Globe-Based 3D PGIS Linjun Yu 1, Xiaotong Zhang 2, Feng He 3,*, Yalan Liu 1 and Dacheng Wang 1 1 Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China; [email protected] (L.Y.); [email protected] (Y.L.); [email protected] (D.W.) 2 China National Engineering Research Center for Human Settlements, Beijing 100044, China; [email protected] 3 School of Urban and Environment, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-13629431746 Received: 9 November 2020; Accepted: 18 December 2020; Published: 21 December 2020 Abstract: With the current spatial planning reform in China, public participation is becoming increasingly important in the success of rural spatial planning. However, engaging various stakeholders in spatial planning projects is difficult, mainly due to the lack of planning knowledge and computer skills. Therefore, this paper discusses the development of a virtual globe-based 3D participatory geographic information system (PGIS) aiming to support public participation in the spatial planning process. The 3D PGIS-based rural planning approach was applied in the village of XiaFan, Ningbo, China. The results demonstrate that locals’ participation capacity was highly promoted, with their interest in 3D PGIS visualization being highly activated. The interactive landscape design tools allow stakeholders to present their own suggestions and designs, just like playing a computer game, thus improving their interactive planning abilities on-site. The scientific analysis tools allow planners to analyze and evaluate planning scenarios in different disciplines in real-time to quickly respond to suggestions from participants on-site.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City's High Line: Participatory Planning Or
    New York City’s High Line: Participatory Planning or Gentrification? Ariel B. Alvarez, McNair Scholar The Pennsylvania State University McNair Faculty Research Advisor: Melissa W. Wright, Ph. D Professor of Geography and Professor of Women Studies College of Earth and Mineral Sciences The Pennsylvania State University Abstract In the last fifty years, participatory planning methods have been utilized by practicing urban planners because they emphasize citizen involvement and equitable representation of disempowered community members. This paper analyzes the degree to which the nonprofit organization and self-proclaimed community group Friends of the High Line facilitated citizen input during remediation of an abandoned elevated freight-car railway, the High Line, into a public park in West Chelsea, New York City. Findings suggest that the High Line is an atypical example of a community driven urban revitalization project and that the participatory planning model may need to be redefined when applied to affluent communities. Introduction The innovative and sleekly designed public High Line park running from Ganesvoort St. to West 20th St. in Manhattan, New York was once considered to be nothing more than an unsightly relic of New York City’s industrial past. Property developers viewed the elevated idle freight car line as a hindrance to potential economic development for the neighborhood while most West Chelsea residents paid little attention to the massive metal structure that had simply morphed into the mundane, industrial urban landscape (High Line History 2010). However, once discussion about demolishing the High Line began amongst members of the Chelsea Property Owners, a group seeking to develop real-estate below the railway, and the former New York City Giuliani administration, two West Chelsea community residents Robert Hammond and Joshua David initiated a grassroots nonprofit organization known as Friends of the High Line.
    [Show full text]