Madison Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Madison Development EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN MADISON DEVELOPMENT Missouri-Madison Project No. 2188-08 NATDAM-MT00561 Submitted October 1, 2009 E:\MAD-EAP2.doc E:\MAD-EAP2.doc E:\MAD-EAP2.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. VERIFICATION…………………………………………………………………….. PLAN HOLDER LIST……………………………………………………………… i I. WARNING FLOWCHART/NOTIFICATION FLOWCHART………………… A. Failure is Imminent or Has Occurred………………………..……………………. 1 B. Potentially Hazardous Situation is Developing………………..…………………. 2 C. Non-failure Flood Warning……………..……………………………………….. 3 II. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE……………………………………………..…………. 4 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION…………………………………………………………. 5 IV. EMERGENCY DETECTION, EVALUATION AND CLASSIFICATION………. 8 V. GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER THE EAP.……………………………. 10 VI. PREPAREDNESS………………………………………………………………….…. 26 VII. INUNDATION MAPS……………………………………………………………….. 31 VIII. APPENDICES………………………………………………………………………. A-1 E:\MAD-EAP2.doc MADISON EAP PLAN HOLDERS LIST FERC – Portland, Oregon Office PPL Montana O & M Supervisor – Polson, MT PPL Montana Madison Dam Foreman – Ennis, MT PPL Montana Hydro Engineering – Butte, MT PPL Montana Manager of Operations & Maintenance – Great Falls, MT PPL Montana Rainbow Operators – Great Falls, MT PPL Montana Resource Coordinator/Power Trading – Butte, MT PPL Montana Public Information Officer – Helena, MT PPL Montana Corporate Office – Billings, MT NorthWestern Energy SOCC – Butte, MT NorthWestern Energy Division Headquarters – Bozeman, MT Sheriffs Office – Gallatin County Sheriffs Office – Madison County Sheriffs Office – Broadwater County DES – Gallatin County DES – Madison County DES – Broadwater County Ennis Police Department – Ennis, MT Madison Valley Rural Fire Department – Ennis, MT West Yellowstone Police Department – West Yellowstone, MT Montana Disaster & Emergency Services – Helena, MT Montana DES District 3 State Representative – Livingston, MT US National Weather Service – Great Falls, MT US Bureau of Land Management – Dillon, MT US Bureau of Land Management – Ennis, MT US Bureau of Reclamation Montana Area Office – Billings, MT US Bureau of Reclamation Casper Control Center – Casper, WY US Bureau of Reclamation – Canyon Ferry Dam Helena, MT Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation – Helena, MT US Forest Service Madison Ranger District – Ennis, MT E:\MAD-EAP2.doc i I. WARNING FLOWCHARTS A. Failure is Imminent or Has Occurred. Failure caused by terrorism, sabotage, major earthquake, etc. B. Potentially Hazardous Situation is Developing. A situation where a failure may develop, but preplanned actions taken during certain events (major flood, earthquake, evidence of piping, etc.) may prevent or mitigate failure. Time permits a qualified engineer to inspect the dam and assess the potentially hazardous situation. C. Non-Failure Flooding. A situation where waterways are at or near flood stage and PPLM operationally does something that may aggravate downstream flooding. (This situation will NOT activate the EAP.) E:\MAD-EAP2.doc PPLM RADIO - GROUP # 5 MADISON DEVELOPMENT CHANNEL 1 - Tx: Rx: - Repeater CHANNEL 2 - Tx/Rx: - Talk Around MISSOURI-MADISON PROJECT NO. 2188-08 OBSERVER/PLANT OPERATOR CHANNEL 3 - Tx: Rx: - Telephone CHANNEL 4 - Tx/Rx: - Truck to Truck (406) - OR(406) CHANNEL 5 - Tx/Rx: - National Power WARNING FLOWCHART/NOTIFICATION FLOWCHART CHANNEL 6 - Tx/Rx: - Mutual Aid Silver (Law) BYPASS IF PLANT FOREMAN IS CHANNEL 7 - Tx/Rx: - Mutual Aid Gold (Government) NOT AVAILABLE. CHANNEL 8 - Tx/Rx: - Mutual Aid Red (Fire) A. FAILURE IS IMMINENT OR HAS OCCURRED PPLM PLANT FOREMAN CHANNEL 9 - Tx/Rx: - Weather THIS PROCEDURE TO BE IMPLEMENTED WHEN (DEPENDING ON THE SEVERITY OF THE EMERGENCY, THE STEVE COVAS CHANNEL 10 - Tx/Rx: - Weather PLANT FOREMAN SHALL HAVE THE OPTION OF MAKING PLANT: (406) - OR (406) CHANNEL 11 - Tx/Rx: - Mutual Aid White (Ambulance) FAILURE IS IMMINENT OR HAS OCCURRED INITIAL CONTACT WITH THE MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF; OR (406) CHANNEL 12 - Tx/Rx: - Mutual Aid Brown (DES) THEN CONTACTING THE HYDRO SUPERVISOR ON-CALL) HOME: (406) - CHANNEL 13 - Tx: Rx: - Gallatin Cty Sheriff - North ALERT THE FOLLOWING RESERVOIRS OF THE CHANNEL 14 - Tx: Rx: - Gallatin Cty Sheriff - South SITUATION. REQUEST THAT A COORDINATED DRAFT CHANNEL 15 - Tx: Rx: - Madison Cty Sheriff BEGIN OF EACH DOWNSTREAM RESERVOIR AND TO PREPARE FOR PASSING HIGH FLOWS. (FOREMAN MAY ASK RSO TO MAKE HIS CALLS) CHANNEL 16 - Tx/Rx: - PPL Pager CHANNEL 17 – Tx: Rx: – Madison R2 (1) PPLM HYDRO OPERATIONS, (2) SUPERVISOR ON-CALL US BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT PPLM RESOURCE COORDINATOR/ (3) REFER TO ON-CALL SCHEDULE OR ENNIS OFFICE RAINBOW SYSTEMS OPERATOR (RSO) POWER TRADING CALL PPLM RAINBOW SYSTEMS OPERATOR (RSO) FOR (1) TIM FINGER RAINBOW PLANT LANCE ELIAS SUPERVISOR ON-CALL OFFICE: (406) - Office: (406) OR Cell: (406) (406) - OR (406) - (UNLISTED) (BOTH 24 HR.) (406) - OR (406) - (UNLISTED) (24 HR.) CELL: (406) PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER BROADWATER DAM (2) MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF STATE OF MONTANA (DNRC) DAVID HOFFMAN (1) DAVE SCHENK PPLM MANAGER OF OFFICE: (406) - LOCAL: DIAL 911 (24 HR.) POWERHOUSE CONTROL ROOM (406) OR (4) CELL: (406) OFFICE: (406) - OR (406) - (406) (HELENA) (BOTH ARE DAY TIME ONLY) OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE (1) (406) - & (406) - (24 HR CELL NUMBERS) JEREMY CLOTFELTER/RAINBOW SHOP HOME: (406) - PPLM RADIO: CHANNEL 15 OFFICE: (406) CELL: (406) - (THIS POINT OF CONTACT WILL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR nd CASPER CONTROL CENTER 2 CELL: (406) NOTIFYING MADISON COUNTY OFFICIALS HAVING DISASTER AND HOME: (406) CANYON FERRY DAM NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE EMERGENCY SERVICES RESPONSIBILITIES) GREAT FALLS, MONTANA (2) US BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (5) GALLATIN COUNTY SHERIFF (307) - OR (307) - (BOTH 24 HR.) (406) - OR (406) - (BOTH 24 HR.) (1) MONTANA DISASTER & JAMES CASHELL (2) EMERGENCY SERVICES LOCAL: 911, OR DISPATCH: (406) - (24-HR HIGH PRIORITY) (406) (24 HR.) DISPATCH: (406) (ROUTINE BUSINESS) ALERT THE FOLLOWING RESERVOIRS OF THE SITUATION PPLM RADIO: CHANNEL 13 AND REQUEST THAT THE UPSTREAM RESERVOIR REDUCE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE ITS OUTFLOW TO MINIMUM LEVELS. STATE OF MONTANA (2) NORTHWESTERN ENERGY (THIS POINT OF CONTACT WILL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR SYSTEMS DISPATCHER OFFICE: (406) - NOTIFYING GALLATIN COUNTY OFFICIALS HAVING DISASTER AND PPLM ASSISTANT RESERVOIR ATTENDANT SOCC CENTER (24 HR.) EMERGENCY SERVICES RESPONSIBILITIES)) (406) OR (406) - OR (406) - BRET PEARSON (6) FERC - PORTLAND BROADWATER COUNTY SHERIFF PAGER: (406) - (3) HEBGEN DAM OFFICE: (406) DEPUTY REGIONAL ENGINEER BRENDA LUDWIG LOCAL DIAL 911 HOME: (406) - NORTHWESTERN ENERGY EDWARD PEREZ RELIEF ASSISTANT RESERVOIR ATTENDANT OFFICE: (503) OFFICE: (406) - OR BOZEMAN DIVISION CELL: (503) - (406) (BOTH 24 HR.) GLENN WHEELER SUPERVISOR-ON-CALL HOME: (503) HOME: (406) - (REFER TO ON-CALL SCHEDULE) OR CALL REGIONAL ENGINEER (THIS POINT OF CONTACT WILL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR NOTIFYING BROADWATER COUNTY OFFICIALS HAVING PATRICK REGAN NOTIFICATION WARNING EXAMPLE DISASTER AND EMERGENCY SERVICES RESPONSIBILITIES)) “This is John Doe, Plant Operator for PPLM at Madison OFFICE: (503) (7) Dam. I am calling to implement the Madison Dam EAP MANAGER HYDRO ENGINEERING CELL: (503) - “Failure is Imminent or Has Occurred” Flowchart CARRIE HARRIS HOME: (503) notification procedure on page 1 of the Plan. This is not a OFFICE: (406) test! I repeat, this is not a test.” Explain the failure CELL: (406) NOTE: circumstances and conclude with “do you understand how to HOME: (406) - FOR VOICE MAIL OR ANSWERING MACHINE MESSAGES, NOTE: SHERIFF AND DES SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR carryout your responsibilities according to the EAP?” REFER TO SECTION V-C. NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES PROVIDING EMERGENCY SERVICES TO NOTIFY AND EVACUATE AFFECTED RESIDENTS WITHIN THEIR JURISDICTIONAL AREA. THIS DIAGRAM IS CURRENT FOR 2010 AND REFLECTS ALL CHANGES PER THE 2009 ANNUAL REVIEW, 10/01/09 (1), ETC. INDICATES ORDER OF CALLS E:\MAD-EAP2.doc 1 MADISON DEVELOPMENT MISSOURI-MADISON PROJECT NO. 2188-08 WARNING FLOWCHART/NOTIFICATION FLOWCHART B. POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS SITUATION IS DEVELOPING THIS PROCEDURE TO BE IMPLEMENTED WHEN POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS SITUATION IS DEVELOPING OBSERVER/PLANT OPERATOR (406) OR (406) BYPASS IF MADISON PLANT FOREMAN IS NOT AVAILABLE MADISON DAM PPLM PLANT FOREMAN STEVE COVAS PPLM MANAGER OF PLANT: (406) OR (406) OR (406) - HOME: (406) OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE JEREMY CLOTFELTER/RAINBOW SHOP OFFICE: (406) CELL: (406) - nd PPLM HYDRO OPERATIONS, (1) 2 CELL: (406) HOME: (406) SUPERVISOR ON-CALL REFER TO ON-CALL SCHEDULE OR CALL PPLM RAINBOW SYSTEMS OPERATOR (RSO) FOR SUPERVISOR ON-CALL MANAGER HYDRO ENGINEERING (406) OR (406) (UNLISTED) (24 HR.) CARRIE HARRIS OFFICE: (406) CELL: (406) - 2nd CELL: (406) HOME: (406) MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF DAVE SCHENK (2) LOCAL: DIAL 911 (24 HR.) FERC - PORTLAND OFFICE: (406) OR (406) - PPLM RADIO: CHANNEL 15 DEPUTY REGIONAL ENGINEER EDWARD PEREZ OFFICE: (503) CELL: (503) - HOME: (503) OR CALL REGIONAL ENGINEER GALLATIN COUNTY SHERIFF JAMES CASHELL PATRICK REGAN (3) LOCAL: 911, OR OFFICE: (503) DISPATCH: (406) - (24-HR HIGH PRIORITY) CELL: (503) - DISPATCH: (406) (ROUTINE BUSINESS) HOME: (503) PPLM RADIO: CHANNEL 13 NOTE: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE SITUATION WILL DETERMINE WHETHER A COORDINATED DRAFT OF DOWNSTREAM RESERVOIRS AND REDUCTION OF OUTFLOWS AT UPSTREAM RESERVOIRS IS REQUIRED, OR IF EMERGENCY OFFICIALS SHOULD BE NOTIFIED. NOTE: FOR VOICE MAIL OR ANSWERING MACHINE MESSAGES, NOTE: REFER TO SECTION V-C. NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES IF THE SITUATION WERE TO DEVELOP INTO A SITUATION WHERE FAILURE IS IMMINENT OR HAS OCCURRED, THE THIS DIAGRAM IS CURRENT FOR
Recommended publications
  • 2003 Actual Operations
    INTRODUCTION Annual reports on actual operations and operating plans for reservoir regulation activities were initiated in 1953. The Montana Are Office, Wyoming Area Office, Dakota Area Office and the Regional Office are all responsible for preparing reports on actual operations and operating plans for reservoir within the Upper Missouri River Basin above Sioux City, Iowa. This report briefly summarizes weather and strearnflow conditions in the Upper Missouri river Basin during water year 2003, which are principal factors governing the pattern of reservoir operations. This report also describes operations during water year 2003 for reservoirs constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) for providing flood control and water supplies for power generation, irrigation, municipal and industrial uses, and to enhance recreation, fish, and wildlife benefits. This report includes operating plans to show estimated ranges of operation for water 2004, with a graphical presentation on a monthly basis. The operating plans for the reservoirs are presented only to show possible operations under a wide range of inflows, most of which cannot be reliably forecasted at the time operating plans are prepared; therefore, plans are at best only probabilities. The plans are updated monthly, as the season progresses, to better coordinate the actual water and power requirements with more reliable estimates of inflow. A report devoted to "Energy Generation" is included at the end of this report. The energy generation and water used for power at Reclamation and Corps of Engineers' (Corps) plants are discusses, and the energy generated in 2003 is compared graphically with that of previous years. Energy produced at the Reclamation and Corps mainstem plants is marketed by the Department of Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, MONTANA Review Report for Water Resources Development, Volume 1 of 3
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln US Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of Defense 1977 MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, MONTANA Review Report for Water Resources Development, Volume 1 of 3 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyceomaha Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons "MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, MONTANA Review Report for Water Resources Development, Volume 1 of 3" (1977). US Army Corps of Engineers. 91. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyceomaha/91 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Defense at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in US Army Corps of Engineers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. MISSOURI RIVER SOUTH OAKOTA,NEBRAsKA,NORTH OAKOTA,MONTANA REVIEW REPORT FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT "'-'• • WATER RESOURCE ENVIRONMENT , HYoRO·ELECTRIC POWER VOLUME 1 OF 3 AUGUST 1977 MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, MONTANA Review Report for Water Resources Development A STUDY c'O REVIEW PERTINENT REPORTS ON THE MISSOURI RIVER AND TO DETERMINE THE ADVISABILITY OF PROVIDING ADDITIONAL ~1EAS· URES FOR FLOOD CONTROL. BANK STABILIZATION. NAVIGATION. HYDRO· POWER GENERATION. RECREATION. FISH AND WILDLIFE PROPAGATION AI'ID OTHER PURPOSES BETWEEN THREE FORKS. MONTANA A.."<'D SIOUX CITY. IOWA. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION AUGUST 1977 ...... --.---.---.-----~--.. Syllabus This atudy investigated a wide range of water resource probl... and opportunities related to the Missouri River and the six main stem d.... along an area extending over 1.500 miles from Sioux City.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri-Madison Project
    Hydropower Project Summary MISSOURI AND MADISON RIVERS, MONTANA MISSOURI-MADISON HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2188) Hauser Dam Morony Dam Photos: PPL Montana This summary was produced by the Hydropower Reform Coalition and River Management Society Missouri and Madison Rivers, Montana MISSOURI AND MADISON RIVERS, MONTANA MISSOURI-MADISON HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2188) DESCRIPTION: This hydropower license includes nine developments, of which eight were constructed between 1906 and 1930, and the ninth- the Cochrane dam- began operation in 1958. The projects are spread over 324 river-miles on the Missouri and Madison rivers. The Hebgen and Madison developments are located on the Madison River whereas the other seven- Hauser, Holter, Black Eagle, Rainbow, Cochrane, Ryan, and Morony- are located on the Missouri River. The Madison River flows into the Missouri River near the city of Three Forks, approximately 33 miles northwest of Bozeman. While this summary was being prepared, Northwestern Energy, a company based in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and serving the Upper Midwest and Northwest, is in the process of acquiring this project. Read more at http://www.northwesternenergy.com/hydroelectric-facilities. A. SUMMARY 1. License application filed: November 25, 1992 2. License issued: September 27, 2000 3. License expiration: August 31, 2040 4. Waterway: Missouri and Madison Rivers 5. Capacity: 326.9 MW 6. Licensee: PPL Montana 7. Counties: Gallatin, Madison, Lewis and Clark, and Cascade Counties 8. Project area: Portions of the project are located on federal lands, including lands within the Gallatin and Helena National Forests 9. Project Website: http://www.pplmontana.com/producing+power/power+plants/PPL+Montana+Hyd ro.htm 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fishing Regulations
    MONTANA FISHING REGULATIONS 20March 1, 2018 — F1ebruary 828, 2019 Fly fishing the Missouri River. Photo by Jason Savage For details on how to use these regulations, see page 2 fwp.mt.gov/fishing With your help, we can reduce poaching. MAKE THE CALL: 1-800-TIP-MONT FISH IDENTIFICATION KEY If you don’t know, let it go! CUTTHROAT TROUT are frequently mistaken for Rainbow Trout (see pictures below): 1. Turn the fish over and look under the jaw. Does it have a red or orange stripe? If yes—the fish is a Cutthroat Trout. Carefully release all Cutthroat Trout that cannot be legally harvested (see page 10, releasing fish). BULL TROUT are frequently mistaken for Brook Trout, Lake Trout or Brown Trout (see below): 1. Look for white edges on the front of the lower fins. If yes—it may be a Bull Trout. 2. Check the shape of the tail. Bull Trout have only a slightly forked tail compared to the lake trout’s deeply forked tail. 3. Is the dorsal (top) fin a clear olive color with no black spots or dark wavy lines? If yes—the fish is a Bull Trout. Carefully release Bull Trout (see page 10, releasing fish). MONTANA LAW REQUIRES: n All Bull Trout must be released immediately in Montana unless authorized. See Western District regulations. n Cutthroat Trout must be released immediately in many Montana waters. Check the district standard regulations and exceptions to know where you can harvest Cutthroat Trout. NATIVE FISH Westslope Cutthroat Trout Species of Concern small irregularly shaped black spots, sparse on belly Average Size: 6”–12” cutthroat slash— spots
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Peck Draft
    US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Draft Fort Peck Dam/Fort Peck Lake Project Montana Surplus Water Report Volume 1 Surplus Water Report Appendix A – Environmental Assessment August 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FORT PECK DAM/FORT PECK LAKE PROJECT, MONTANA SURPLUS WATER REPORT Omaha District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers August 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Fort Peck Dam / Fort Peck Lake, Montana FORT PECK DAM/FORT PECK LAKE MONTANA SURPLUS WATER REPORT August 2012 Prepared By: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District Omaha, NE Abstract: The Omaha District is proposing to temporarily make available 6,932 acre-feet/year of surplus water (equivalent to 17,816 acre-feet of storage) from the system-wide irrigation storage available at the Fort Peck Dam/Fort Peck Lake Project, Montana to meet municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply needs. Under Section 6 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (Public Law 78-534), the Secretary of the Army is authorized to make agreements with states, municipalities, private concerns, or individuals for surplus water that may be available at any reservoir under the control of the Department. Terms of the agreements are normally for five (5) years, with an option for a five (5) year extension, subject to recalculation of reimbursement after the initial five (5) year period. This proposed action will allow the Omaha District to enter into surplus water agreements with interested water purveyors and to issue easements for up to the total amount of surplus water to meet regional water needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallatin County, Montana and Incorporated Areas Volume 1 of 4
    GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA AND INCORPORATED AREAS VOLUME 1 OF 4 Community Name Community Number * BELGRADE, CITY OF 300105 BOZEMAN, CITY OF 300028 GALLATIN COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS 300027 * MANHATTAN, TOWN OF 300034 THREE FORKS, CITY OF 300029 * WEST YELLOWSTONE, TOWN OF 300135 Gallatin County * NON-FLOOD PRONE COMMUNITY REVISEDREVISED PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARYPRELIMINARY DATE:DATE: DATE: AprilMayMay XX, XX, 20, 2020 20202020 XXXXXXXXXX xx XXX Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study Number 30031CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current Flood Insurance Study components. Initial Countywide FIS effective date: September 2, 2011 Revised FIS Dates: April 21, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS – VOLUME 1 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MRR Newsletter
    MRR Newsletter Madison River Ranch Association December 2017 Inside this Issue: Hebgen Dam…The Final Chapter . 5 Introducing…Meet your MRR neighbors, Joe and Linda Young. Find out what brought them to MRR, where they are located and what is important to them about living on the ranch . .3 Learn who is on YOUR Madison River Ranch Association Board . 6 Enjoy Martha’s recipe for Yellowstone Paint Pots Lava Cake . .2 Moose! . 6 Roger Stommel’s Important Message . 4 Sunrise on a smoky morning in September From the President’s Corner John Clark Another season has passed on Madison River Ranch except for the few hardy elk hunters who remain and those looking forward to some Christmas snowmobiling. It was the hottest and driest July and August that most can remember and a terrible wildfire season for the entire state of Montana. Thankfully none of the fires affected our valley. There continues to be a lot of activity in the real estate market in the area with several lots and a couple of homes sold this summer. I want to extend a special welcome to all our new owners. There was also quite a bit of building activity going on which led to the decision not to do a fall grading of the roads since there was so much construction traffic. The roads are in a little rougher shape than normal for the end of the year but will be addressed early in the spring. The roads will also continue to be maintained with the addition of road base. A half-mile of road base was added this year starting at the main gate and continuing down Flat Iron Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Canyon Ferry Dam 30´× 60´ Quadrangle, West-Central Montana
    Geologic Map of the Canyon Ferry Dam 30´× 60´ Quadrangle, West-Central Montana By Mitchell W. Reynolds and Theodore R. Brandt Adel Mountains Willow Mountain Sacajawea Mountain Mm Mann Mm Ml Gulch Mb Gates of the Coulter Canyon Rocky Mountains Ml Mm Mm *Mab Qgl Qa Missouri River Mm Scientific Investigations Map 2860 Canyon of the Missouri River above the Gates of the Rocky Mountains is incised through beds of the Upper and Lower Mississippian Mission Canyon Formation (Mm). On July 19, 1805, the Lewis and Clark expedition named the Gates of the 2005 Rocky Mountains, as the cliffs first appeared as a closed gate, then appeared to open as expedition boats changed course approaching the canyon mouth. Mann Gulch is the site of the infamous forest fire that took the lives of 13 U.S. Forest Service fire fighters in August 1949. View is north-northeast toward the Adel Mountains U.S. Department of the Interior from Upper Holter Lake in the northwest corner of the Canyon Ferry Dam quadrangle. Unit labels as on map explanation. U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Map of the Canyon Ferry Dam 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle, West-Central Montana By Mitchell W. Reynolds and Theodore R. Brandt Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 2860 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ This publication is available online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/2005/2860 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Accountability Report Ver. 3
    ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ON VALUE ENGINEERING FORT PECK RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM: FORT PECK ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX RURAL WATER SYSTEM AND DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER SYSTEM DECEMBER 7, 2001 FORT PECK ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX TRIBES DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY . 1 1.1 Sponsor Process for Evaluation . 1 1.2 Decisions by Sponsors . 2 2. DESCRIPTIONS OF DRAFT FER AND VE PROPOSALS . 5 2.1 Draft FER Proposals . 5 2.1.1 River Intake . 5 2.1.2 Water Treatment Plant . 7 2.1.3 Pipelines . 8 2.1.4 Pumping Stations . 10 2.1.5 Reservoirs . 11 2.2 VE Proposals . 12 2.2.1 Pipeline Reconfiguration with Intake and Water Treatment Plant at Poplar . 12 2.2.2 Pipeline Reconfiguration with Intake and Water Treatment Plant Below Fort Peck Dam . 13 2.2.3 Water Treatment Alternatives . 13 2.2.4 Chloramines . 15 2.2.5 Gravity Intake . 16 3. EVALUATION AND DISCUSSION OF VE PROPOSALS . 17 3.1 Proposal 1A: Revise Design Parameters and Flow Allocation in Main Pipeline System with Intake at Poplar . 17 3.2 Proposal 1B: Revise Design Parameters and Flow Allocation in Main Pipeline System, Change Intake to Dredge Ponds near Nashua, Account for Water Treatment Differences . 22 3.3 Water Treatment Alternatives to Conventional: Superpulsator Clarifier with Microfiltration, Nanofiltration or Media Filtration . 25 3.4 Chloramines . 28 3.5 Gravity Intake . 28 4. SYNOPSIS . 31 ii 1. SUMMARY This report describes the project sponsors' evaluation of and response to the value engineering study1 conducted by the Bureau of Reclamation on the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System, a municipal, rural and industrial water project in the northeast corner of Montana as authorized by PL 106-382 (114 Stat 1451, Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Canyon Ferry Unit History
    Canyon Ferry Project Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program Eric A. Stene Bureau of Reclamation 1994 Table of Contents Canyon Ferry Unit .............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................2 Project Authorization.....................................................4 Construction History .....................................................5 Post Construction History ................................................18 Settlement of Project ....................................................18 Uses of Project Water ...................................................19 Conclusion............................................................20 About the Author .............................................................20 Bibliography ................................................................21 Manuscripts and Archival Collections.......................................21 Government Documents .................................................21 Books ................................................................21 Articles...............................................................21 Index ......................................................................22 1 Canyon Ferry Unit Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program As the Bureau of Reclamation approached its fiftieth birthday, its leaders envisioned projects on an increasingly grand scale. Reclamation's counterpart from the War Department,
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate History of the Montana Power Company 1882-1913
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1951 Corporate history of the Montana Power Company 1882-1913 Douglas Frank Leighton The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Leighton, Douglas Frank, "Corporate history of the Montana Power Company 1882-1913" (1951). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 7465. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/7465 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CORPORATE HISTORY OF THE MOHTARA POWER COMPANY 1882 -* 1913 by DOUGLAS F. ^IGHTOR B. A.* Montana State University, 1950 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts li 1 | MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY 1951 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: EP38266 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT OiftMKtation PubJIahing UMI EP38266 Published by ProQuest LLC (2013). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
    [Show full text]
  • West Fork Madison and Jack Creek Temperature Conditions
    APPENDIX H – TEMPERATURE CONDITIONS FOR LOWER MADISON RIVER AND WEST FORK MADISON RIVER TABLE OF CONTENTS H1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... H-2 H2.0 Madison River (Madison Dam to Mouth) Temperature Conditions ................................................ H-2 H3.0 West Fork Madison River Temperature Conditions ......................................................................... H-4 H4.0 References ........................................................................................................................................ H-7 Madison Sediment and Temperature TMDLs - Appendix H H1.0 INTRODUCTION Cherry Creek, Elk Creek, and Moore Creek were found to be temperature impaired through the Madison TMDL Planning Area temperature study, and TMDLs were written for those streams, details of which can be found in Section 6.0 of the main TMDL document. Jack Creek was not identified prior to this study as having a temperature impairment but was evaluated based on field reconnaissance and stakeholder concern. Data collected during this effort indicates Jack Creek is not impaired for temperature and no TMDL was written and a summary of the Jack Creek data is not included in this appendix. This appendix details stream conditions in the Madison River below Madison Dam (Assessment Unit MT41F001_010) and the West Fork Madison River (Assessment Unit MT41F004_100), both of which currently remain listed for temperature impairment in Montana’s 2018 Water Quality Integrated Report (DEQ, 2018). H2.0 MADISON RIVER (MADISON DAM TO MOUTH) TEMPERATURE CONDITIONS The Madison River downstream of Ennis Lake (Madison Dam), also referred to as the lower Madison River, has a hydrologic regime that is modified by the presence of two major reservoirs, Hebgen Lake and Ennis Lake (Madison Reservoir). The Madison River flows from its headwaters in Yellowstone National Park into Hebgen Lake, which is located just outside of the Yellowstone National Park boundary.
    [Show full text]