2003 Actual Operations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2003 Actual Operations INTRODUCTION Annual reports on actual operations and operating plans for reservoir regulation activities were initiated in 1953. The Montana Are Office, Wyoming Area Office, Dakota Area Office and the Regional Office are all responsible for preparing reports on actual operations and operating plans for reservoir within the Upper Missouri River Basin above Sioux City, Iowa. This report briefly summarizes weather and strearnflow conditions in the Upper Missouri river Basin during water year 2003, which are principal factors governing the pattern of reservoir operations. This report also describes operations during water year 2003 for reservoirs constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) for providing flood control and water supplies for power generation, irrigation, municipal and industrial uses, and to enhance recreation, fish, and wildlife benefits. This report includes operating plans to show estimated ranges of operation for water 2004, with a graphical presentation on a monthly basis. The operating plans for the reservoirs are presented only to show possible operations under a wide range of inflows, most of which cannot be reliably forecasted at the time operating plans are prepared; therefore, plans are at best only probabilities. The plans are updated monthly, as the season progresses, to better coordinate the actual water and power requirements with more reliable estimates of inflow. A report devoted to "Energy Generation" is included at the end of this report. The energy generation and water used for power at Reclamation and Corps of Engineers' (Corps) plants are discusses, and the energy generated in 2003 is compared graphically with that of previous years. Energy produced at the Reclamation and Corps mainstem plants is marketed by the Department of Energy. Table CET6, entitled "Total Reservoir Storage Contents at the End of Water years 2000 and 2003," compares the water storage available at the beginning of water year 2004 to that available at the beginning of water year 2003. Table CET7 is a summary of the end of month storage contents for each reservoir during water year 2003. The Montana Area Office also assists in the preparation of plans for operation of the Corps reservoir on the main stem of the Missouri river by furnishing depletion estimates based upon the operating plans presented in this report. All references to a year in this report will mean the water year extending from October I through September 30, unless specifically stated otherwise. 1 SUMMARY OF HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS AND FLOOD CONTROL DURING 2003 Antecedent Conditions: There were extremely dry conditions that existed following the 2002 water year. The temperatures and precipitation for water year 2002 varied significantly between basins. Temperatures were warm in the fall and ranged from cooler to warmer than average for the spring and summer. Precipitation for many basins was much below normal with the only exceptions being areas in northcentral and central Montana. The Marias, Milk and St. Mary basins all finished the water year with above normal mountain and valley precipitation. The Sun River basin finished the year with near average mountain and valley precipitation. The 2002 snowpack as of April 1 ranged from below to above normal in the river basins in Montana and Wyoming. It ranged from 73 percent of normal in the Bighorn River basin to 118 percent of normal in the St. Mary River basin. The low snowpack, in addition to the below average valley rains produced dry conditions east of the Continental Divide, excluding the north and northcentral parts of Montana. The dry conditions were reflected in the inflows for the year. Inflows for water year 2002 were much below average and several low inflow records were set. The exceptions were Lake Sherburne, Lake Elwell and Fresno Reservoir which received above average annual inflow. Annual inflow was the fourth lowest on record for Canyon Ferry, the second lowest for Clark Canyon Reservoir, and the lowest on record for Bighorn Lake. The end of September storage for Reclamation reservoirs ranged from much below average to above average for the month of September. Releases during 2002 were very conservative at Reclamation projects. At three major Reclamation projects, Yellowtail, Clark Canyon, and Canyon Ferry Dams releases were below the minimum desired for the fishery as recommended by the Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP). October through December: The 2003 snowfall season got off to a very slow start. Even slower than last year at this time. The mountain snowpack distribution during 2003 was generally like year 2002, where low and mid elevation mountain snowpack was generally worse than the high elevation mountain snowpack. Persistent north winds resulted in cooler and drier conditions for much of October. The El Nino forecast for above average temperatures and below average precipitation held true for much of the early part of water year 2003, with the exception of October temperatures. For most Montana reporting stations located east of the Continental Divide, precipitation during October through December ranged from below normal to much below normal. This was an indication of what was to come. For the northern Rockies, the drought 2 kept its grip for the fourth consecutive year. Precipitation for the Bighorn Basin in Wyoming was also much below normal, Table MTT3. October through December inflows were much below normal at all Reclamation reservoirs in Montana east of the Continental divide with the exception of Fresno Reservoir. During the fall several new record low inflows were set. A new record low inflow was recorded at Canyon Ferry for November, while Clark Canyon had a new record low for December. A new record low inflow was recorded for Bighorn Lake during both November and December. January through March: On January 1, the Natural Resources Conservation Service reported mountain snowpack in Montana east of the Continental Divide where Reclamation facilities are located ranged from 9 percent of normal in the Milk River Basin to 68 percent of normal in the Beaverhead River Basin. The mountain snowpack was 72-74 percent of normal in the Bighorn River Basin of Wyoming. Mountain snow water content statewide was 63 percent of average and 77 percent of last year and was generally 20 to 30 percent below 2002. West of the Continental Divide, mountain snow water content was 61 percent of average and 71 percent of last year. East of the Continental Divide, mountain snow water content was 66 percent of average and 88 percent of last year. January through March cumulative precipitation was much below average to above average. Storm activity during January and February in Montana added significant amounts of mountain snow and due to the warmer temperatures the snow was able to carry a lot of moisture. January average temperature departures state-wide were generally 5 to 6 degrees above normal. The above average temperatures carried into February; however, towards the end of the month, record cold air pushed across Montana and the associated snowfall had much less moisture. By March 1, mountain snow water content east of the Continental Divide, was 84 percent of average and 109 percent of last year. The above average precipitation continued into March with a few basins reporting about twice the normal amount. East of the Continental Divide, March mountain and valley precipitation was 133 percent of average and 144 percent of last year. During March valley temperatures were generally above average west of the Continental Divide and generally near to below average east of the Continental Divide. Temperature variations throughout the month caused some low land flooding. January through March inflows were below normal to much below normal. The exception was Lake Sherburne which was 117 percent of average. Inflow for January and February to Bighorn Lake was the lowest on record and January inflow to Clark Canyon was also the lowest on record. April through July: Some drought relief was seen in parts Montana with near to above normal precipitation during February through May. In addition, late snow in the second half of April helped to reduce the 3 snow melt in some basins in Montana. As of April 1, mountain snow water contents statewide were 93 percent of average and 97 percent of last year. West of the Continental Divide snowpack was 92 percent of average and 85 percent of last year. East of the Continental Divide snowpack was 96 percent of average and 115 percent of last year. During April, precipitation varied across the state with mountain areas in the Columbia River basin at 90 percent of average, the Missouri River basin at 126 percent of average and the Yellowstone River basin at 76 percent of average. Overall, April mountain and valley precipitation across the state was 116 percent of average and 130 percent of last year. April temperatures were generally near average in the southwest and above average across other areas of Montana. Precipitation was reduced in May. Mountain and valley precipitation across the state was 85 percent of average and 93 percent of last year, while east of the Continental Divide mountain and valley precipitation was 94 percent of average and 111 percent of last year. May was a month of extremes. Early in the month snow was accumulating in the mountains and record low temperatures were seen in southwest Montana. By the end on the month, temperatures rebounded to record highs with snow melt well above average. The cold temperatures early in the month held on to snow that melted rapidly with the high temperatures later in the month. With above average temperatures there were several areas that reported flooding. Flooding was generally minor and occurred mainly on farm land. As of June 1, remaining mountain snow water contents were generally ranging from near average to severely below average.
Recommended publications
  • Madison Development
    EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN MADISON DEVELOPMENT Missouri-Madison Project No. 2188-08 NATDAM-MT00561 Submitted October 1, 2009 E:\MAD-EAP2.doc E:\MAD-EAP2.doc E:\MAD-EAP2.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. VERIFICATION…………………………………………………………………….. PLAN HOLDER LIST……………………………………………………………… i I. WARNING FLOWCHART/NOTIFICATION FLOWCHART………………… A. Failure is Imminent or Has Occurred………………………..……………………. 1 B. Potentially Hazardous Situation is Developing………………..…………………. 2 C. Non-failure Flood Warning……………..……………………………………….. 3 II. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE……………………………………………..…………. 4 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION…………………………………………………………. 5 IV. EMERGENCY DETECTION, EVALUATION AND CLASSIFICATION………. 8 V. GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER THE EAP.……………………………. 10 VI. PREPAREDNESS………………………………………………………………….…. 26 VII. INUNDATION MAPS……………………………………………………………….. 31 VIII. APPENDICES………………………………………………………………………. A-1 E:\MAD-EAP2.doc MADISON EAP PLAN HOLDERS LIST FERC – Portland, Oregon Office PPL Montana O & M Supervisor – Polson, MT PPL Montana Madison Dam Foreman – Ennis, MT PPL Montana Hydro Engineering – Butte, MT PPL Montana Manager of Operations & Maintenance – Great Falls, MT PPL Montana Rainbow Operators – Great Falls, MT PPL Montana Resource Coordinator/Power Trading – Butte, MT PPL Montana Public Information Officer – Helena, MT PPL Montana Corporate Office – Billings, MT NorthWestern Energy SOCC – Butte, MT NorthWestern Energy Division Headquarters – Bozeman, MT Sheriffs Office – Gallatin County Sheriffs Office – Madison County Sheriffs Office – Broadwater County
    [Show full text]
  • MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, MONTANA Review Report for Water Resources Development, Volume 1 of 3
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln US Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of Defense 1977 MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, MONTANA Review Report for Water Resources Development, Volume 1 of 3 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyceomaha Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons "MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, MONTANA Review Report for Water Resources Development, Volume 1 of 3" (1977). US Army Corps of Engineers. 91. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyceomaha/91 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Defense at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in US Army Corps of Engineers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. MISSOURI RIVER SOUTH OAKOTA,NEBRAsKA,NORTH OAKOTA,MONTANA REVIEW REPORT FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT "'-'• • WATER RESOURCE ENVIRONMENT , HYoRO·ELECTRIC POWER VOLUME 1 OF 3 AUGUST 1977 MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, MONTANA Review Report for Water Resources Development A STUDY c'O REVIEW PERTINENT REPORTS ON THE MISSOURI RIVER AND TO DETERMINE THE ADVISABILITY OF PROVIDING ADDITIONAL ~1EAS· URES FOR FLOOD CONTROL. BANK STABILIZATION. NAVIGATION. HYDRO· POWER GENERATION. RECREATION. FISH AND WILDLIFE PROPAGATION AI'ID OTHER PURPOSES BETWEEN THREE FORKS. MONTANA A.."<'D SIOUX CITY. IOWA. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION AUGUST 1977 ...... --.---.---.-----~--.. Syllabus This atudy investigated a wide range of water resource probl... and opportunities related to the Missouri River and the six main stem d.... along an area extending over 1.500 miles from Sioux City.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fishing Regulations
    MONTANA FISHING REGULATIONS 20March 1, 2018 — F1ebruary 828, 2019 Fly fishing the Missouri River. Photo by Jason Savage For details on how to use these regulations, see page 2 fwp.mt.gov/fishing With your help, we can reduce poaching. MAKE THE CALL: 1-800-TIP-MONT FISH IDENTIFICATION KEY If you don’t know, let it go! CUTTHROAT TROUT are frequently mistaken for Rainbow Trout (see pictures below): 1. Turn the fish over and look under the jaw. Does it have a red or orange stripe? If yes—the fish is a Cutthroat Trout. Carefully release all Cutthroat Trout that cannot be legally harvested (see page 10, releasing fish). BULL TROUT are frequently mistaken for Brook Trout, Lake Trout or Brown Trout (see below): 1. Look for white edges on the front of the lower fins. If yes—it may be a Bull Trout. 2. Check the shape of the tail. Bull Trout have only a slightly forked tail compared to the lake trout’s deeply forked tail. 3. Is the dorsal (top) fin a clear olive color with no black spots or dark wavy lines? If yes—the fish is a Bull Trout. Carefully release Bull Trout (see page 10, releasing fish). MONTANA LAW REQUIRES: n All Bull Trout must be released immediately in Montana unless authorized. See Western District regulations. n Cutthroat Trout must be released immediately in many Montana waters. Check the district standard regulations and exceptions to know where you can harvest Cutthroat Trout. NATIVE FISH Westslope Cutthroat Trout Species of Concern small irregularly shaped black spots, sparse on belly Average Size: 6”–12” cutthroat slash— spots
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Peck Draft
    US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Draft Fort Peck Dam/Fort Peck Lake Project Montana Surplus Water Report Volume 1 Surplus Water Report Appendix A – Environmental Assessment August 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FORT PECK DAM/FORT PECK LAKE PROJECT, MONTANA SURPLUS WATER REPORT Omaha District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers August 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Fort Peck Dam / Fort Peck Lake, Montana FORT PECK DAM/FORT PECK LAKE MONTANA SURPLUS WATER REPORT August 2012 Prepared By: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District Omaha, NE Abstract: The Omaha District is proposing to temporarily make available 6,932 acre-feet/year of surplus water (equivalent to 17,816 acre-feet of storage) from the system-wide irrigation storage available at the Fort Peck Dam/Fort Peck Lake Project, Montana to meet municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply needs. Under Section 6 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (Public Law 78-534), the Secretary of the Army is authorized to make agreements with states, municipalities, private concerns, or individuals for surplus water that may be available at any reservoir under the control of the Department. Terms of the agreements are normally for five (5) years, with an option for a five (5) year extension, subject to recalculation of reimbursement after the initial five (5) year period. This proposed action will allow the Omaha District to enter into surplus water agreements with interested water purveyors and to issue easements for up to the total amount of surplus water to meet regional water needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Canyon Ferry Dam 30´× 60´ Quadrangle, West-Central Montana
    Geologic Map of the Canyon Ferry Dam 30´× 60´ Quadrangle, West-Central Montana By Mitchell W. Reynolds and Theodore R. Brandt Adel Mountains Willow Mountain Sacajawea Mountain Mm Mann Mm Ml Gulch Mb Gates of the Coulter Canyon Rocky Mountains Ml Mm Mm *Mab Qgl Qa Missouri River Mm Scientific Investigations Map 2860 Canyon of the Missouri River above the Gates of the Rocky Mountains is incised through beds of the Upper and Lower Mississippian Mission Canyon Formation (Mm). On July 19, 1805, the Lewis and Clark expedition named the Gates of the 2005 Rocky Mountains, as the cliffs first appeared as a closed gate, then appeared to open as expedition boats changed course approaching the canyon mouth. Mann Gulch is the site of the infamous forest fire that took the lives of 13 U.S. Forest Service fire fighters in August 1949. View is north-northeast toward the Adel Mountains U.S. Department of the Interior from Upper Holter Lake in the northwest corner of the Canyon Ferry Dam quadrangle. Unit labels as on map explanation. U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Map of the Canyon Ferry Dam 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle, West-Central Montana By Mitchell W. Reynolds and Theodore R. Brandt Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 2860 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ This publication is available online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/2005/2860 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Accountability Report Ver. 3
    ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ON VALUE ENGINEERING FORT PECK RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM: FORT PECK ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX RURAL WATER SYSTEM AND DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER SYSTEM DECEMBER 7, 2001 FORT PECK ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX TRIBES DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY . 1 1.1 Sponsor Process for Evaluation . 1 1.2 Decisions by Sponsors . 2 2. DESCRIPTIONS OF DRAFT FER AND VE PROPOSALS . 5 2.1 Draft FER Proposals . 5 2.1.1 River Intake . 5 2.1.2 Water Treatment Plant . 7 2.1.3 Pipelines . 8 2.1.4 Pumping Stations . 10 2.1.5 Reservoirs . 11 2.2 VE Proposals . 12 2.2.1 Pipeline Reconfiguration with Intake and Water Treatment Plant at Poplar . 12 2.2.2 Pipeline Reconfiguration with Intake and Water Treatment Plant Below Fort Peck Dam . 13 2.2.3 Water Treatment Alternatives . 13 2.2.4 Chloramines . 15 2.2.5 Gravity Intake . 16 3. EVALUATION AND DISCUSSION OF VE PROPOSALS . 17 3.1 Proposal 1A: Revise Design Parameters and Flow Allocation in Main Pipeline System with Intake at Poplar . 17 3.2 Proposal 1B: Revise Design Parameters and Flow Allocation in Main Pipeline System, Change Intake to Dredge Ponds near Nashua, Account for Water Treatment Differences . 22 3.3 Water Treatment Alternatives to Conventional: Superpulsator Clarifier with Microfiltration, Nanofiltration or Media Filtration . 25 3.4 Chloramines . 28 3.5 Gravity Intake . 28 4. SYNOPSIS . 31 ii 1. SUMMARY This report describes the project sponsors' evaluation of and response to the value engineering study1 conducted by the Bureau of Reclamation on the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System, a municipal, rural and industrial water project in the northeast corner of Montana as authorized by PL 106-382 (114 Stat 1451, Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Canyon Ferry Unit History
    Canyon Ferry Project Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program Eric A. Stene Bureau of Reclamation 1994 Table of Contents Canyon Ferry Unit .............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................2 Project Authorization.....................................................4 Construction History .....................................................5 Post Construction History ................................................18 Settlement of Project ....................................................18 Uses of Project Water ...................................................19 Conclusion............................................................20 About the Author .............................................................20 Bibliography ................................................................21 Manuscripts and Archival Collections.......................................21 Government Documents .................................................21 Books ................................................................21 Articles...............................................................21 Index ......................................................................22 1 Canyon Ferry Unit Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program As the Bureau of Reclamation approached its fiftieth birthday, its leaders envisioned projects on an increasingly grand scale. Reclamation's counterpart from the War Department,
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate History of the Montana Power Company 1882-1913
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1951 Corporate history of the Montana Power Company 1882-1913 Douglas Frank Leighton The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Leighton, Douglas Frank, "Corporate history of the Montana Power Company 1882-1913" (1951). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 7465. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/7465 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CORPORATE HISTORY OF THE MOHTARA POWER COMPANY 1882 -* 1913 by DOUGLAS F. ^IGHTOR B. A.* Montana State University, 1950 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts li 1 | MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY 1951 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: EP38266 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT OiftMKtation PubJIahing UMI EP38266 Published by ProQuest LLC (2013). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Reservation History Status and Alternatives
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1984 Protecting Montana's water for future use: Water reservation history status and alternatives Mark D. O'Keefe The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation O'Keefe, Mark D., "Protecting Montana's water for future use: Water reservation history status and alternatives" (1984). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 8522. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/8522 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PROTECTING MONTANA'S WATER FOR FUTURE USE: WATER RESERVATION HISTORY, STATUS AND ALTERNATIVES By Mark D. O'Keefe B.A., California State University, Sacramento, 1977 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1984 Approved by: Chairman, Board of Examiners an. Graduate school / ' ' ” ' Date / Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: EP39323 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri River Dams Larval Walleye Entrainment Investigation
    Missouri River Dams Larval Walleye Entrainment Investigation PPL-Montana MOTAC project 781-12 Prepared by Grant Grisak and Brad Tribby Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Andrea Spake and McKenzie Leonard University of Great Falls December 2012 Introduction Studies have shown that since the increase in walleye numbers in Canyon Ferry Reservoir in 1996-97 there has been a sustained increase in walleye numbers in the Missouri River below Holter Dam (Grisak et al. 2012). This relationship suggests that walleye produced upstream in Canyon Ferry, Hauser and/or Holter reservoirs may be flushing past the dams and residing in the Missouri River downstream of Holter Dam. During the annual brown trout population estimate in the Craig section (April/May) of the Missouri River, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (MFWP) fishery workers have observed a small number of post-spawn female walleye, which indicates natural reproduction is occurring in this section of river. Since 2009, seining surveys for young of the year (YOY) walleye in the Missouri River between Cascade and Great Falls have shown some preliminary but predictable trends in YOY walleye distribution and abundance. In general, YOY walleye are distributed throughout this 55-mile reach in low numbers consistent with the relatively low adult walleye numbers measured during trout population estimates. From 1983 to 2011, in the Craig section, during spring electrofishing walleye averaged 0.7% (range 0.1-3.0%) of the total fish handled. From 1982 to 2011, in the Craig section, during fall electrofishing, walleye have averaged 0.4% (range 0.1-2.9%) of the total fish handled.
    [Show full text]
  • Helena Climate Change Task Force Report
    Helena Climate Change Task Force Action Plan 2009 HELENA, MONTANA ACTION COMMITTEE: Stan Bradshaw Ben Brouwer Anna Jones-Crabtree DD Dowden Kristine Edwards Nancy Hall Patrick Judge Alan Peura Rebecca Ridenour Helena Climate Change Task Force Stan Bradshaw, Chair Patrick Judge (NWEC/MEIC), Vice Chair Task Force Working Groups: Implementation Anna Jones-Crabtree , IMP Chair Ben Brouwer (AERO) Patrick Judge (NWEC/MEIC) Stan Bradshaw ENERGY Patrick Judge (NWEC/MEIC), NRG Chair Anna Jones-Crabtree Thomas Murray Kristine Edwards Alan Peura (Liaison to ICLEI) Rebecca Ridenour Max Milton Els Van Woert Water Stan Bradshaw, WTR Chair Alan Peura (Liaison to ICLEI) Ken Wallace Shannon Downey Nancy Hall Transportation, Waste, RECYCLING, PUBLIC-Private Partnership Will Selser, TWRP Co-Chair Ben Brouwer (AERO), TWRP Co-Chair DD Dowden Rebecca Ridenour Stephanie Wallace PUblications DD Dowden Thomas Murray WEBMASTER Thomas Murray cover photos courtesy of www.MontanaPictures.net Helena Climate Change Task Force Stan Bradshaw, Chair Patrick Judge (NWEC/MEIC), Vice Chair Task Force Working Groups: IMPLementatiON Anna Jones-Crabtree , IMP Chair Ben Brouwer (AERO) Patrick Judge (NWEC/MEIC) Stan Bradshaw ENERGY Patrick Judge (NWEC/MEIC), NRG Chair Kristine Edwards Anna Jones-Crabtree Max Milton Thomas Murray Alan Peura (Liaison to ICLEI) Rebecca Ridenour Els Van Woert Water Stan Bradshaw, WTR Chair Shannon Downey Nancy Hall Alan Peura Ken Wallace TRANSPOrtatiON, Waste, RECYCLING, PUBLIC-Private Partnership Will Selser, TWRP Co-Chair Ben Brouwer (AERO), TWRP
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Missouri River Reservoir Fisheries Management Plan 2010-2019
    Upper Missouri River Reservoir Fisheries Management Plan 2010-2019 May 2010 Contents List of Figures List of Tables Executive Summary and Plan Implementation ........................................................ E-1 Section 1 Management Plan Area ................................................................................ 1 Canyon Ferry Reservoir and Missouri River (Toston Dam to Canyon Ferry Reservoir) ......... 1 Reservoir Operation ..............................................................................................................2 Fisheries and Water Quality ..................................................................................................5 Canyon Ferry Reservoir ..................................................................................................5 Missouri River (Toston Dam to Canyon Ferry Reservoir) ................................................. 6 Hauser Reservoir, Holter Reservoir, and Missouri River (Hauser Tailwater) .......................... 9 Reservoir Operation ...................................................................................................... 11 Fisheries and Water Quality .......................................................................................... 11 Hauser Reservoir ..................................................................................................... 11 Missouri River - Hauser Tailwater (Hauser Dam To Holter Reservoir) ..................... 12 Holter Reservoir ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]