DOCSLIB.ORG

Upper Basin Pallid Sturgeon Workgroup Annual Report for Work Completed in 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Upper Basin Pallid Sturgeon Workgroup Annual Report for Work Completed in 2018 Upper Basin Pallid Sturgeon Workgroup Annual Report for Work Completed in 2018 Photo by Sam Stukel This report documents the work of the Upper Missouri River Basin Pallid Sturgeon Workgroup (Workgroup) during 2018. The report consists of minutes of the annual meeting of the Workgroup Governing Board, minutes of the annual Workgroup meeting held in Billings in March 2018, updates of on-going work and reports completed by members of the Workgroup and other contractors. In order to limit the size of this document, where available, executive summaries of project reports are used rather than entire reports. Also, where reports included large numbers of tables or multiple appendices, much of this data is not included in this report. Users of this Annual Report are encouraged to contact researchers, principal investigators or project leaders for more detailed information. The Governing Board of the Workgroup during this period consisted of the following individuals. Their work affiliation and the focus areas they represent are indicated. Zach Shattuck, Chair, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Luke Holmquist, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, RPMA 1 Mat Rugg, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, RPMA 2 Landon Pierce, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, RPMA 3 Tyler Haddix, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Habitat Pat Bratten, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Research Rob Holm, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Propagation Vacant, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Funding* Ken Staigmiller, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Fish Health Kevin Kappenman, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Stocking and Tagging *The Governing Board decided to have Ryan Wilson occupy the vacant position on the Governing Board beginning in 2017. TABLE OF CONTENTS Annual Governing Board meeting minutes – September 5-6, 2018 ............................................... 1 Annual Workgroup meeting minutes – March 6-8, 2018 ............................................................... 9 Native Endangered Species Recovery (Pallid Sturgeon) RPMA 1 2018 ........................................ 20 Upper Missouri River Pallid Sturgeon Tagging and Telemetry Study II ........................................ 37 2018 Pallid Sturgeon Population Assessment and Associated Fish Community Monitoring for the Missouri River: Segment 2 ...................................................................................................... 51 2018 Pallid Sturgeon Population Assessment and Associated Fish Community Monitoring for the Missouri River: Segment 3 ............................................................................................................ 54 2018 Field-based Biotic Assessments of Migration and Spawning – Upper Missouri River and Milk River ...................................................................................................................................... 57 2018 Pallid Sturgeon Population Assessment and Associated Fish Community Monitoring for the Missouri River: Segment 4 ............................................................................................................ 59 Examination of Pallid Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus Albus) Larval Drift, Development, And Swimming Abilities ................................................................................................................ 61 Density of Pallid Sturgeon and Food Web Dynamics in the Missouri River: Inferences Regarding Carrying Capacity and Density-Dependent Response of Pallid Sturgeon to the Contemporary Stocking Protocol ................................................................................................ 102 Genotypic Analyses and Parental Identifications of Juvenile and Sub-adult Pallid Sturgeon in the Missouri River ....................................................................................................................... 187 Gavins Point NFH) ....................................................................................................................... 199 Garrison Dam NFH ...................................................................................................................... 200 Steroid analysis ........................................................................................................................... 219 DRAFT Pallid Sturgeon Migration and Spawning in the Yellowstone River, 2018 ...................... 222 Meeting Notes from the UBPSWG Governing Board Meeting September 5-6, 2018 Billings, MT The following are the notes from the September, 2018, meeting of the Upper Basin Pallid Sturgeon Recovery Workgroup Governing Board. A summary of the action items assigned during the meeting appears at the end of the meeting notes. Zach Shattuck, Rob Holm, Ryan Wilson, Mat Rugg, Bill Rice, Luke Holmquist, Alyssa Fellow, Matt Marsh, Ken Staigmiller, Landon Pierce, Wayne Nelson-Stastny, Yvette Converse, Kevin Kappenman, Tyler Haddix, Pat Braaten and Bob Snyder were present at the meeting. Attending by phone was Brian Marotz. Wednesday, September 5 Opening Comments Zach opened the meeting thanking WAPA for its support. Mat Marsh requested that WAPA contractors submit their invoices in a timely manner, include as much project detail as possible, and provide annual reports. Wayne and Landon – MRRP process The MRRP flow chart was discussed. The Middle Basin submitted seven issue papers for transmittal to the fall Fish Team meeting. Four will move forward. There were no issue papers from the Lower Basin. Zach is currently finalizing Upper Basin issue papers. Zach commented that we need to better understand the Effects Analysis process and timeline. Prior to the fall Fish Science there will be a webinar and data-dump along with preliminary discussions on October 31-November 1. The Fish Science meeting will be on November 27 in conjunction with the fall MRRIC plenary meeting November 26-29. Joe Bonneau would like the information for the fall Fish Science meeting by mid-September. The flow for the fall Fish Science process is; Workgroup collection of issues and new information Fall webinar Fall Fish Science meeting Adaptive management meeting (March) 1 It was asked how others, besides USGS can bid on proposed projects. Zach and Brian presented the Upper Basin issue papers: Warmwater restoration below Ft. Peck Dam and selective withdrawal at Ft. Peck Dam. Survival of larvae drifting through Intake Dam at various flows. Larval drift duration, area of intersection, and habitat change at various Missouri River discharges. Wayne – Recovery Implementation Planning The USFWS has begun its Species Status Assessment process. It will include breaking down recovery strategies into actions. Partnerships are key to move forward. There is currently no timeline for completion of the process. Landon – RPMA 3 Stocking and leakage of fish downstream USFWS has asked the Middle Basin for guidance in stocking and organization of RPMA 3 (put in Middle Basin?). The Upper Basin’s role for RPMA 3 needs further discussion. RPMA 3 update The USACE has decided that population assessment in RPMA 3 will only occur every five years. 2019 will be the first year and consist of two days of trammel netting and two days of trotlining. USACE will do monitoring. Fish growth of later age classes is lower than earlier-stocked age classes. Action item – Landon suggests the Workgroup discusses growth rates observed and prepare an issue paper. Zach – Current events The Governing Board unanimously approved that Zach remain the Workgroup Chair. Action item – Zach will send out the latest draft of the operating procedures to the Governing Board and will collect the last round of comments. The Governing Board will vote on the final approval later this year. 2 Alyssa (WAPA’s funding agency representative) and Luke (RPMA 1 representative) were approved as members of the Governing Board. USACE and Bureau Reclamation signed the Workgroup MOU. Jodi Sunstedt (with WAPA) will work to get them to sign. Funding for the Workgroup Facilitator will run out at the end of the current contract (March 2019). The Upper Basin Workgroup will request through Don Skaar that MRNRC seek funding to continue the Workgroup Facilitator contract. Action item – Zach will find out remaining balance in MRNRC account for the facilitator contract. Final carrying capacity report should be done late September. Final approval of these reports by the Workgroup is needed for researchers to remain in good standing with the Workgroup. Action item – Zach will seek and assemble comments on the MSU carrying capacity reports. Action items - Bob needs to bring “goodies” to these meetings. Thursday, September 6 Luke – RPMA 1 update Luke started working for MTFWP in July. This year’s high flows caused no settling to occur, which is usually provides half of the Pallid Sturgeon sampled. Six reproductive Pallid Sturgeon moved into the Marias. At least some of the females went atretic. Luke is waiting for histology results to determine if a female spawned. Two females that were in their second reproductive cycle went atretic. There are eight wild Pallid Sturgeon that are telemetered in RPMA 1. Kevin – New tags needed There is a need for tag that detects the rapid movement that takes place during spawning to confirm spawning occurred. Bettel has developed such tags for other species. A letter of support from the Workgroup to Bettel would encourage them to develop a tag appropriate for Pallid Sturgeon. Action item – Zach will draft a letter to Bettel to encourage development of a tag that identifies spawning behavior. 3 Mat,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Madison Development
    EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN MADISON DEVELOPMENT Missouri-Madison Project No. 2188-08 NATDAM-MT00561 Submitted October 1, 2009 E:\MAD-EAP2.doc E:\MAD-EAP2.doc E:\MAD-EAP2.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. VERIFICATION…………………………………………………………………….. PLAN HOLDER LIST……………………………………………………………… i I. WARNING FLOWCHART/NOTIFICATION FLOWCHART………………… A. Failure is Imminent or Has Occurred………………………..……………………. 1 B. Potentially Hazardous Situation is Developing………………..…………………. 2 C. Non-failure Flood Warning……………..……………………………………….. 3 II. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE……………………………………………..…………. 4 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION…………………………………………………………. 5 IV. EMERGENCY DETECTION, EVALUATION AND CLASSIFICATION………. 8 V. GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER THE EAP.……………………………. 10 VI. PREPAREDNESS………………………………………………………………….…. 26 VII. INUNDATION MAPS……………………………………………………………….. 31 VIII. APPENDICES………………………………………………………………………. A-1 E:\MAD-EAP2.doc MADISON EAP PLAN HOLDERS LIST FERC – Portland, Oregon Office PPL Montana O & M Supervisor – Polson, MT PPL Montana Madison Dam Foreman – Ennis, MT PPL Montana Hydro Engineering – Butte, MT PPL Montana Manager of Operations & Maintenance – Great Falls, MT PPL Montana Rainbow Operators – Great Falls, MT PPL Montana Resource Coordinator/Power Trading – Butte, MT PPL Montana Public Information Officer – Helena, MT PPL Montana Corporate Office – Billings, MT NorthWestern Energy SOCC – Butte, MT NorthWestern Energy Division Headquarters – Bozeman, MT Sheriffs Office – Gallatin County Sheriffs Office – Madison County Sheriffs Office – Broadwater County
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Actual Operations
    INTRODUCTION Annual reports on actual operations and operating plans for reservoir regulation activities were initiated in 1953. The Montana Are Office, Wyoming Area Office, Dakota Area Office and the Regional Office are all responsible for preparing reports on actual operations and operating plans for reservoir within the Upper Missouri River Basin above Sioux City, Iowa. This report briefly summarizes weather and strearnflow conditions in the Upper Missouri river Basin during water year 2003, which are principal factors governing the pattern of reservoir operations. This report also describes operations during water year 2003 for reservoirs constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) for providing flood control and water supplies for power generation, irrigation, municipal and industrial uses, and to enhance recreation, fish, and wildlife benefits. This report includes operating plans to show estimated ranges of operation for water 2004, with a graphical presentation on a monthly basis. The operating plans for the reservoirs are presented only to show possible operations under a wide range of inflows, most of which cannot be reliably forecasted at the time operating plans are prepared; therefore, plans are at best only probabilities. The plans are updated monthly, as the season progresses, to better coordinate the actual water and power requirements with more reliable estimates of inflow. A report devoted to "Energy Generation" is included at the end of this report. The energy generation and water used for power at Reclamation and Corps of Engineers' (Corps) plants are discusses, and the energy generated in 2003 is compared graphically with that of previous years. Energy produced at the Reclamation and Corps mainstem plants is marketed by the Department of Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, MONTANA Review Report for Water Resources Development, Volume 1 of 3
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln US Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of Defense 1977 MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, MONTANA Review Report for Water Resources Development, Volume 1 of 3 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyceomaha Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons "MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, MONTANA Review Report for Water Resources Development, Volume 1 of 3" (1977). US Army Corps of Engineers. 91. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyceomaha/91 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Defense at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in US Army Corps of Engineers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. MISSOURI RIVER SOUTH OAKOTA,NEBRAsKA,NORTH OAKOTA,MONTANA REVIEW REPORT FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT "'-'• • WATER RESOURCE ENVIRONMENT , HYoRO·ELECTRIC POWER VOLUME 1 OF 3 AUGUST 1977 MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, MONTANA Review Report for Water Resources Development A STUDY c'O REVIEW PERTINENT REPORTS ON THE MISSOURI RIVER AND TO DETERMINE THE ADVISABILITY OF PROVIDING ADDITIONAL ~1EAS· URES FOR FLOOD CONTROL. BANK STABILIZATION. NAVIGATION. HYDRO· POWER GENERATION. RECREATION. FISH AND WILDLIFE PROPAGATION AI'ID OTHER PURPOSES BETWEEN THREE FORKS. MONTANA A.."<'D SIOUX CITY. IOWA. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION AUGUST 1977 ...... --.---.---.-----~--.. Syllabus This atudy investigated a wide range of water resource probl... and opportunities related to the Missouri River and the six main stem d.... along an area extending over 1.500 miles from Sioux City.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana's Basin Closures and Controlled Groundwater Areas
    Montana's Basin Closures and Controlled Groundwater Areas Revised & Updated June 2016 Water Resource Division Water Rights Bureau 1424 9th Avenue P.O. Box 201601 Helena, Montana 59620-1601 http://dnrc.mt.gov/divisions/water/water-rights/montana-basin-closures for questions call (406) 444-1601 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS General Information ............................................................................. 4 Controlled Groundwater Areas: BNSF Paradise Railyard ........................................................................ 5 BNSF Somers Railyard ........................................................................... 6 Hays Creek ............................................................................................ 8 Larson Creek ......................................................................................... 9 Bitterroot Sanitary Landfill ................................................................... 10 Warm Springs Ponds ............................................................................. 11 Rocker ................................................................................................... 12 Old Butte Landfill/Clark Tailings Site .................................................... 13 Butte Alluvial and Bedrock Site ............................................................. 15 East Valley (East Helena) ………………………………………………………………….. 16 Bozeman Solvent Site ............................................................................ 17 Idaho Pole Company Site .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri-Madison Project
    Hydropower Project Summary MISSOURI AND MADISON RIVERS, MONTANA MISSOURI-MADISON HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2188) Hauser Dam Morony Dam Photos: PPL Montana This summary was produced by the Hydropower Reform Coalition and River Management Society Missouri and Madison Rivers, Montana MISSOURI AND MADISON RIVERS, MONTANA MISSOURI-MADISON HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2188) DESCRIPTION: This hydropower license includes nine developments, of which eight were constructed between 1906 and 1930, and the ninth- the Cochrane dam- began operation in 1958. The projects are spread over 324 river-miles on the Missouri and Madison rivers. The Hebgen and Madison developments are located on the Madison River whereas the other seven- Hauser, Holter, Black Eagle, Rainbow, Cochrane, Ryan, and Morony- are located on the Missouri River. The Madison River flows into the Missouri River near the city of Three Forks, approximately 33 miles northwest of Bozeman. While this summary was being prepared, Northwestern Energy, a company based in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and serving the Upper Midwest and Northwest, is in the process of acquiring this project. Read more at http://www.northwesternenergy.com/hydroelectric-facilities. A. SUMMARY 1. License application filed: November 25, 1992 2. License issued: September 27, 2000 3. License expiration: August 31, 2040 4. Waterway: Missouri and Madison Rivers 5. Capacity: 326.9 MW 6. Licensee: PPL Montana 7. Counties: Gallatin, Madison, Lewis and Clark, and Cascade Counties 8. Project area: Portions of the project are located on federal lands, including lands within the Gallatin and Helena National Forests 9. Project Website: http://www.pplmontana.com/producing+power/power+plants/PPL+Montana+Hyd ro.htm 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fishing Regulations
    MONTANA FISHING REGULATIONS 20March 1, 2018 — F1ebruary 828, 2019 Fly fishing the Missouri River. Photo by Jason Savage For details on how to use these regulations, see page 2 fwp.mt.gov/fishing With your help, we can reduce poaching. MAKE THE CALL: 1-800-TIP-MONT FISH IDENTIFICATION KEY If you don’t know, let it go! CUTTHROAT TROUT are frequently mistaken for Rainbow Trout (see pictures below): 1. Turn the fish over and look under the jaw. Does it have a red or orange stripe? If yes—the fish is a Cutthroat Trout. Carefully release all Cutthroat Trout that cannot be legally harvested (see page 10, releasing fish). BULL TROUT are frequently mistaken for Brook Trout, Lake Trout or Brown Trout (see below): 1. Look for white edges on the front of the lower fins. If yes—it may be a Bull Trout. 2. Check the shape of the tail. Bull Trout have only a slightly forked tail compared to the lake trout’s deeply forked tail. 3. Is the dorsal (top) fin a clear olive color with no black spots or dark wavy lines? If yes—the fish is a Bull Trout. Carefully release Bull Trout (see page 10, releasing fish). MONTANA LAW REQUIRES: n All Bull Trout must be released immediately in Montana unless authorized. See Western District regulations. n Cutthroat Trout must be released immediately in many Montana waters. Check the district standard regulations and exceptions to know where you can harvest Cutthroat Trout. NATIVE FISH Westslope Cutthroat Trout Species of Concern small irregularly shaped black spots, sparse on belly Average Size: 6”–12” cutthroat slash— spots
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Peck Draft
    US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Draft Fort Peck Dam/Fort Peck Lake Project Montana Surplus Water Report Volume 1 Surplus Water Report Appendix A – Environmental Assessment August 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FORT PECK DAM/FORT PECK LAKE PROJECT, MONTANA SURPLUS WATER REPORT Omaha District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers August 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Fort Peck Dam / Fort Peck Lake, Montana FORT PECK DAM/FORT PECK LAKE MONTANA SURPLUS WATER REPORT August 2012 Prepared By: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District Omaha, NE Abstract: The Omaha District is proposing to temporarily make available 6,932 acre-feet/year of surplus water (equivalent to 17,816 acre-feet of storage) from the system-wide irrigation storage available at the Fort Peck Dam/Fort Peck Lake Project, Montana to meet municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply needs. Under Section 6 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (Public Law 78-534), the Secretary of the Army is authorized to make agreements with states, municipalities, private concerns, or individuals for surplus water that may be available at any reservoir under the control of the Department. Terms of the agreements are normally for five (5) years, with an option for a five (5) year extension, subject to recalculation of reimbursement after the initial five (5) year period. This proposed action will allow the Omaha District to enter into surplus water agreements with interested water purveyors and to issue easements for up to the total amount of surplus water to meet regional water needs.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL Canyonferry Cover.Psd
    Revised Environmental Assessment Contents Chapter 1: Introduction Purpose and Need .............................................................1 Background ..................................................................2 Dam and Reservoir...........................................................2 Helena Valley Irrigation District ................................................3 Toston Irrigation District ......................................................5 City of Helena...............................................................6 Relationship of the Proposed Action of Other Activities ...............................7 Decisions to be Made...........................................................9 Issues.......................................................................9 Significant Issues..............................................................9 Other Resource Issues..........................................................9 Chapter 2: Alternatives Alternatives Considered in Detail................................................11 Proposed Action Alternative ...................................................11 Irrigation ................................................................11 Municipal and Industrial Water ...............................................13 Mitigation Measures .......................................................13 Water Quality ...........................................................13 Riparian Habitat .........................................................14 Grebe Nesting...........................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Ecology and Movement of Pallid Sturgeon in the Upper Missouri River, Montana
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln US Fish & Wildlife Publications US Fish & Wildlife Service 7-26-2019 Reproductive ecology and movement of pallid sturgeon in the upper Missouri River, Montana Luke M. Holmquist Christopher S. Guy Anne Tews David J. Trimpe Molly A.H. Webb Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usfwspubs This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Fish & Wildlife Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in US Fish & Wildlife Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Received: 24 April 2019 | Revised: 22 July 2019 | Accepted: 26 July 2019 DOI: 10.1111/jai.13962 STURGEON PAPER Reproductive ecology and movement of pallid sturgeon in the upper Missouri River, Montana Luke M. Holmquist1 | Christopher S. Guy2 | Anne Tews3 | David J. Trimpe4 | Molly A. H. Webb5 1Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Lewistown Area Resource Office, 205 Abstract West Aztec, Lewistown, MT 59457, USA Successful recruitment of endangered pallid sturgeon has not been documented in 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Montana the upper Missouri River basin for decades, and research on the reproductive ecol‐ Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Department of Ecology, Montana State ogy of pallid sturgeon has been hindered by low sample size. A conservation propa‐ University, Bozeman, Montana gation program was initiated in the 1990s, and the oldest age class of hatchery‐origin 3Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Lewistown Area Resource Office, pallid sturgeon are becoming sexually mature increasing the number of reproduc‐ Lewistown, Montana tively‐active fish in the system.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form 1. Name 2. Location 3. Classification 4. Owner of Property 5
    FHH-8-300 (11-78) United States Department off the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections 1. Name historic GREAT FALLS PORTAGE NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK and/or common 2. Location street & number not for publication Second city, town Great Falls vicinity of congressional district Cascade 013 state Montana CQde 30 county code 3. Classification Category Ownership Stai bus Present Use X district public ** .occupied xx agriculture museum «V"-M* building(s) private xx 4inoccupied commercial .sVjEV ttflfitf structure ^^ both work in progress educational xx private residence site Public Acquisition Ace essible entertainment religious object in process xx yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military xx oi.hei.'. cemetery 4. Owner of Property name Office of the Mayor/ State Department of Fish and Game/multiple private and public ownership street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Cascade County Courthouse street & number city, town Great Falls, state Montana 6. Representation in Existing Surveys NONE title has this property been determined elegible? __ yes no date federal state county local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one excellent deteriorated unaltered xx original site ** flood ruins altered moved dpte fair unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance Lewis and Clark were probably the first white men to view the Great Falls of the Missouri, the fourteen-mile stretch of falls and rapids where the river drops 520 feet over five great rock shelves and the river channel rushes between 200 foot high canyon-like walls.
    [Show full text]
  • CASCADE COUNTY BIRTH RECORDS THRU 1944 NO. DATE FILED NAME of FATHER MOTHERS MAIDEN NAME DATE of SEX COLOR CITY BIRTH (Or Great Falls Address) 5992 7-Jan-1921 Quady A
    CASCADE COUNTY BIRTH RECORDS THRU 1944 NO. DATE FILED NAME OF FATHER MOTHERS MAIDEN NAME DATE OF SEX COLOR CITY BIRTH (or Great Falls address) 5992 7-Jan-1921 Quady A. T. Tobin Nellie 6-Dec-1912 M W 401 4 Av SW 38744 5-Jun-1944 Quady Philip Albert Billerbeck Florence Helen 27-May-1944 M W Adele Apts #9 6515 30-Jan-1921 Quaid Dan D. McLean Lena 4-Oct-1913 M W 623 4 Av S 5373 17-Nov-1920 Quaid David D. McLean Ferra 26-Oct-1911 F W 316 4 Av N 21971 31-Mar-1930 Quail James W. Manil Margaret E. 31 Dec 1895 F W Sun River MT 21972 31-Mar-1930 Quail James W. Manil Margaret E. 8 Aug 1897 F W Sun River MT 21973 31-Mar-1930 Quail James W. Manil Margaret E. 15 Aug 1898 F W Sun River MT 1891 19-Jun-1920 Quaintance Harry Nellie 8-Feb-1903 M W 22 9 Av S 35523 5-Aug-1940 Quammen* Welton June 8-Jul-1942 M W *adopted name 6360 28-Jan-1921 Quanley* Edward A. Walker Evelyn 3-Jul-1913 M W *may be Danley 23063 29-May-1931 Quast Albert Geigle Emma 9-Apr-1931 M W Great Falls MT 29710 7-Dec-1938 Quast Albert Geigle Emma 3-Nov-1938 M W Morony Dam 6975 18-Feb-1921 Quealy Michael Mary 18-May-1914 F W Brady MT 11042 8-Jun-1919 Quealy Michael Shields Mary 16-Aug-1918 F W Great Falls MT 7547 26-Apr-1921 Quealy Michael Shields Mary 1-Nov-1915 F W Brady MT 31252 5-Jun-1940 Queen Henry C.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Canyon Ferry Dam 30´× 60´ Quadrangle, West-Central Montana
    Geologic Map of the Canyon Ferry Dam 30´× 60´ Quadrangle, West-Central Montana By Mitchell W. Reynolds and Theodore R. Brandt Adel Mountains Willow Mountain Sacajawea Mountain Mm Mann Mm Ml Gulch Mb Gates of the Coulter Canyon Rocky Mountains Ml Mm Mm *Mab Qgl Qa Missouri River Mm Scientific Investigations Map 2860 Canyon of the Missouri River above the Gates of the Rocky Mountains is incised through beds of the Upper and Lower Mississippian Mission Canyon Formation (Mm). On July 19, 1805, the Lewis and Clark expedition named the Gates of the 2005 Rocky Mountains, as the cliffs first appeared as a closed gate, then appeared to open as expedition boats changed course approaching the canyon mouth. Mann Gulch is the site of the infamous forest fire that took the lives of 13 U.S. Forest Service fire fighters in August 1949. View is north-northeast toward the Adel Mountains U.S. Department of the Interior from Upper Holter Lake in the northwest corner of the Canyon Ferry Dam quadrangle. Unit labels as on map explanation. U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Map of the Canyon Ferry Dam 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle, West-Central Montana By Mitchell W. Reynolds and Theodore R. Brandt Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 2860 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ This publication is available online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/2005/2860 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]