Traffic Studies and Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Traffic Studies and Analysis Guide to Traffic Management Part 3: Traffic Studies and Analysis Sydney 2017 Guide to Traffic Management Part 3: Traffic Studies and Analysis Third edition prepared by: Clarissa Han, Ian Espada, Glenn Geers and Publisher Reza Mohajerpoor Austroads Ltd. Level 9, 287 Elizabeth Street Third edition project manager: Chris Ray Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Phone: +61 2 8265 3300 Abstract [email protected] Austroads’ Guide to Traffic Management has 13 parts and provides www.austroads.com.au comprehensive coverage of traffic management guidance for practitioners involved in traffic engineering, road design, town planning and road safety. About Austroads Guide to Traffic Management Part 3: Traffic Studies and Analysis is Austroads is the peak organisation of Australasian concerned with the collection and analysis of traffic data for the purpose of road transport and traffic agencies. traffic management and traffic control within a network. It serves as a means to ensure some degree of consistency in conducting traffic studies and Austroads’ purpose is to support our member surveys. It provides guidance on the different types of traffic studies and organisations to deliver an improved Australasian surveys that can be undertaken, their use and application, and methods for road transport network. To succeed in this task, we traffic data collection and analysis. undertake leading-edge road and transport research which underpins our input to policy Part 3 covers applications of the theory presented in Part 2 of the Guide, and development and published guidance on the provides guidance on traffic analysis for uninterrupted and interrupted flow design, construction and management of the road facilities and for various types of intersections. It outlines sound methods of network and its associated infrastructure. analysis for effective traffic management, design and control. Austroads provides a collective approach that Keywords delivers value for money, encourages shared knowledge and drives consistency for road users. Traffic management, road network, data collection, data analysis, field study, speed, origin-destination, level of service, traffic capacity, traffic flow, Austroads is governed by a Board consisting of intersection, unsignalised intersection, roundabout, signalised intersection. senior executive representatives from each of its eleven member organisations: Edition 3.1 published March 2018 • Roads and Maritime Services New South Wales • In Section 4.1, corrects Equation 5 for the calculation of the capacity of a • Roads Corporation Victoria significant length of a single traffic lane for the prevailing roadway and traffic • Queensland Department of Transport and Main conditions. Roads • Corrects a worked example in capacity analysis in Section C.1.1.1. • Main Roads Western Australia Edition 3.0 published November 2017 • Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure South Australia • This third edition updates Section 2 and Appendix K, and provides a new Appendix L with alternative data sources and their use cases for traffic • Department of State Growth Tasmania studies. This version also includes a new Section 3.4 Multi-modal Level of • Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Service and a new Section 3.5 Austroads Pedestrian Facility Selection Tool. Logistics Northern Territory A new Section 7 and Appendix M were produced and two commentaries were amended to provide high-level modelling guidelines. • Transport Canberra and City Services Directorate, Australian Capital Territory Second edition published April 2013 • Australian Government Department of First edition published August 2009 Infrastructure and Regional Development • Australian Local Government Association ISBN 978-1-925671-18-6 Pages 215 • New Zealand Transport Agency. Austroads Project No. NTM2081 Austroads Publication No. AGTM03-17 © Austroads Ltd 2017 | This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without the prior written permission of Austroads. Acknowledgements First edition prepared by David Bennett, Rod Troutbeck, Peter Croft, David McTiernan, Agasteena Shah and project managed by John Erceg. Second edition prepared by Clarissa Han and James Luk and project managed by Steve Brown. This Guide is produced by Austroads as a general guide. Its application is discretionary. Road authorities may vary their practice according to local circumstances and policies. Austroads believes this publication to be correct at the time of printing and does not accept responsibility for any consequences arising from the use of information herein. Readers should rely on their own skill and judgement to apply information to particular issues. Guide to Traffic Management Part 3: Traffic Studies and Analysis Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Scope and Context ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Introduction to Traffic Studies and Traffic Analysis .................................................................................. 3 1.3 Structure of this Part ................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Traffic Studies and Surveys .................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Traffic Studies and Data Needs ............................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Planning and Designing Traffic Studies ................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Systems Approach to Traffic Studies ......................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Preliminary Planning ................................................................................................................... 7 2.2.3 Sample and Experimental Design .............................................................................................. 9 2.2.4 Survey Form Design ................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.5 Pilot Survey................................................................................................................................. 9 2.2.6 Conducting Surveys ................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.7 Data Coding and Entry ............................................................................................................. 10 2.2.8 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 11 2.2.9 Presentation of Results ............................................................................................................ 11 2.2.10 Archiving ................................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Statistical Methods and Sampling .......................................................................................................... 12 2.3.1 Statistical Methods ................................................................................................................... 12 2.3.2 Sampling Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 2.3.3 Sampling Error and Bias ........................................................................................................... 14 2.3.4 Sample Size Determination ...................................................................................................... 15 2.4 Data Integrity .......................................................................................................................................... 16 2.5 Traffic Surveys ........................................................................................................................................ 17 2.5.1 Traffic Volume Surveys (Appendix A) ...................................................................................... 18 2.5.2 Speed Surveys (Appendix B) ................................................................................................... 18 2.5.3 Travel Time, Delay and Queuing Surveys (Appendix C) ......................................................... 19 2.5.4 Origin-destination Surveys (Appendix D) ................................................................................. 20 2.5.5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Surveys (Appendix E) ......................................................................... 20 2.5.6 Noise, Fuel and Emission Surveys (Appendix F) ..................................................................... 22 2.5.7 Vehicle Mass and Dimension Surveys (Appendix G) ............................................................... 22 2.5.8 Parking Surveys (Appendix H) ................................................................................................. 22 2.5.9 Traffic Generation Surveys (Appendix I) .................................................................................. 23 2.6 New and Alternative Data Sources .......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Download the 2019-20 Annual Report
    Annual Report 2019–20 2 Austroads Ltd l Annual Report 2019–20 l Overview Overview Contents Austroads is the peak organisation Overview 2 of Australasian road transport and Chair’s Report 5 traffic agencies. Chief Executive’s Report 7 Austroads members are collectively responsible for managing more than Work Program 8 900,000 kilometres of roads valued at more than $250 billion, representing the single largest community asset in Australia and New Zealand. Governance 9 Austroads’ purpose is to support our member organisations to deliver an Activities 9 improved Australasian road transport network. One that meets the future Structure 10 needs of the community, industry and economy. A road network that is safer for all users and provides vital and reliable connections to places and people. Awards 11 A network that uses resources wisely and is mindful of its impact on the environment. World Road Association 13 To succeed in this task, we undertake leading-edge road and transport NEVDIS 14 research which underpins our input to policy development and published guidance on the design, construction and management of the road network Assets Program 17 and its associated infrastructure. We administer the National Exchange of Vehicle and Driver Information Network Program 28 System (NEVDIS), a unique national system which enables road authorities to interact across state borders and directly supports the transport and Safety Program 37 automotive industries. Future Vehicles and In 2019 we acquired Transport Certification Australia Ltd (TCA). This trusted Technology Program 48 partner to government, technology providers and industry stakeholders provides assurance services relating to transport technologies and data to Knowledge Sharing 56 enable improved public purpose outcomes from road transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Stochastic Based Multidimensional Matrix for the Analysis of Pavement Performance Data
    Development of a Stochastic Based Multidimensional Matrix for the Analysis of Pavement Performance Data A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering in the University of Canterbury by Jacobus Daniel van der Walt University of Canterbury 2017 Supervisor: Dr E. Scheepbouwer Co-Supervisor: Dr B. D. Pidwerbesky Abstract As pavement condition becomes an ever-growing problem within the ageing New Zealand road network, a challenge emerges to effectively analyse the ageing pavement databases to improve pavement performance. Establishing how the various factors affect pavement performance is complicated due to the random features of pavement deterioration and the complex relationships between different parameters. To address this, it is proposed that a new tool be developed that will combine critical indicators into one structure for performance comparisons. The tool takes the form of a stochastic multidimensional matrix which can deal with random features and complex relationships. The range of pavement technologies that will be compared is based on data available within the New Zealand Long-Term Pavement Performance database (LTPP). The data is collected by professionals with industry standard or better equipment for New Zealand conditions. This research found a possible weak point in data quality. The location with respect to the wheel path of where the data was collected is estimated to the best of an engineer’s ability and not measured directly. If data was not collected in the wheel paths, allowances must be made. This research presented a new methodology to check and quantify the wheel paths distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Ocean Road and Scenic Environs National Heritage List
    Australian Heritage Database Places for Decision Class : Historic Item: 1 Identification List: National Heritage List Name of Place: Great Ocean Road and Rural Environs Other Names: Place ID: 105875 File No: 2/01/140/0020 Primary Nominator: 2211 Geelong Environment Council Inc. Nomination Date: 11/09/2005 Principal Group: Monuments and Memorials Status Legal Status: 14/09/2005 - Nominated place Admin Status: 22/08/2007 - Included in FPAL - under assessment by AHC Assessment Recommendation: Place meets one or more NHL criteria Assessor's Comments: Other Assessments: : Location Nearest Town: Apollo Bay Distance from town (km): Direction from town: Area (ha): 42000 Address: Great Ocean Rd, Apollo Bay, VIC, 3221 LGA: Surf Coast Shire VIC Colac - Otway Shire VIC Corangamite Shire VIC Location/Boundaries: About 10,040ha, between Torquay and Allansford, comprising the following: 1. The Great Ocean Road extending from its intersection with the Princes Highway in the west to its intersection with Spring Creek at Torquay. The area comprises all that part of Great Ocean Road classified as Road Zone Category 1. 2. Bells Boulevarde from its intersection with Great Ocean Road in the north to its intersection with Bones Road in the south, then easterly via Bones Road to its intersection with Bells Beach Road. The area comprises the whole of the road reserves. 3. Bells Beach Surfing Recreation Reserve, comprising the whole of the area entered in the Victorian Heritage Register (VHR) No H2032. 4. Jarosite Road from its intersection with Great Ocean Road in the west to its intersection with Bells Beach Road in the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Brisbane Heritage Walk/Drive Booklet
    Engineering Heritage Inner Brisbane A Walk / Drive Tour Engineers Australia Queensland Division National Library of Australia Cataloguing- in-Publication entry Title: Engineering heritage inner Brisbane: a walk / drive tour / Engineering Heritage Queensland. Edition: Revised second edition. ISBN: 9780646561684 (paperback) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Brisbane (Qld.)--Guidebooks. Brisbane (Qld.)--Buildings, structures, etc.--Guidebooks. Brisbane (Qld.)--History. Other Creators/Contributors: Engineers Australia. Queensland Division. Dewey Number: 919.43104 Revised and reprinted 2015 Chelmer Office Services 5/10 Central Avenue Graceville Q 4075 Disclaimer: The information in this publication has been created with all due care, however no warranty is given that this publication is free from error or omission or that the information is the most up-to-date available. In addition, the publication contains references and links to other publications and web sites over which Engineers Australia has no responsibility or control. You should rely on your own enquiries as to the correctness of the contents of the publication or of any of the references and links. Accordingly Engineers Australia and its servants and agents expressly disclaim liability for any act done or omission made on the information contained in the publication and any consequences of any such act or omission. Acknowledgements Engineers Australia, Queensland Division acknowledged the input to the first edition of this publication in 2001 by historical archaeologist Kay Brown for research and text development, historian Heather Harper of the Brisbane City Council Heritage Unit for patience and assistance particularly with the map, the Brisbane City Council for its generous local history grant and for access to and use of its BIMAP facility, the Queensland Maritime Museum Association, the Queensland Museum and the John Oxley Library for permission to reproduce the photographs, and to the late Robin Black and Robyn Black for loan of the pen and ink drawing of the coal wharf.
    [Show full text]
  • ITS Australia National Awards Shortlisted Finalists
    Media Release ITS Australia National Awards Shortlisted Finalists Melbourne 10 October 2017 – The increasing strength of the Australian Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) industry has been reflected in a record number of nominations for the 2017 ITS Australia National Awards. The Judging Panel, comprising ITS leaders, considered nearly twice as many submissions across all categories, compared to 2016. The ITS Australia National Awards recognise high level individual and team achievement and are an opportunity to celebrate innovation and reward excellence. In their 8th year, the Awards will be hosted by ITS Australia at The Pavilion, Arts Centre Melbourne, on November 23 2017, when the winners will be announced. The Hon Tim Pallas, Treasurer of Victoria, will present the Awards. “The Intelligent Transport Systems industry plays an increasingly important role in safer, more efficient and sustainable freight and people movements, and the ITS Australia National Awards recognises those who make significant industry contribution,” Treasurer Tim Pallas said. After much consideration, the 2017 ITS Australia National Awards shortlisted finalists are: Industry Award • Aldridge Traffic Controllers – ATSC4 Traffic Signal Controller with VC6.1 TRAFF and HRS Software Project Description: The ATSC4 Controller runs the latest version of the RMS TRAFF software enabling it to take advantage of the latest generation SCATS software. The ATSC4 maintains a high level of performance for safety critical operation when expanding the hardware capability at larger
    [Show full text]
  • Drivers' Judgement of Safety and Speed on Rural Curved Roads and at Night
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT FEDERAL OFFICE OF ROAD SAFETY DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL INFORMATION Report NO. mte Pagea ISBN ISSN CR60 June 1999 174 rl 642 51402X CR-0810-77C Title and Subtitle SPEED PERCEPTION 2: Drivers' judgmts of safety and sped on mal straight and curved roads and for different follwing distances. Author (5) FILDES, B.N., LEENING, A.C. and CORRIGAN, J.McM. performing Orqanisation Royal Automobile Club of Victoria (RACV) Limited, 550 Princes Highway, NOBLE PARK, VICTORIA, 3174, AUSTRALIA. ipon s or Federal Office of Road Safety, G.P.O. Sox 594, CANSCRRA, A.C.T., 2601, AUSTRALIA. rvailable from Price/Availability/FOmt 'ederal Office of Road Safety I lbstract This project was a continuation of a previous study in speed perception that evaluated the role of the type of road and road width, roadside development, travel speed, driving experience and the sex of the driver on estimates of safety and travel speed (Fildes, Fletcher & Corrigan, 1987). In the first experiment, the effect of night driving and time of testing on a driver's perception of speed on straight rural roads was assessed using the previous methodology. A validation study was performed to test whether the laboratory assessment technique was suitable for assessing speed perception at rural curves. A multi- factorial experiment followed that assessed the role of the previous road, environment, and driver variables (as well as curve radius and curve direction) on drivers' estimates of safety and travel speed on flat rural curves. The last experiment was a preliminary study to see whether the speed perception methodology was also suited to testing perceptions of following distance in rural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interrelationships Between Speed Limits, Geometry, and Driver Behavior Final Report November 2018
    The Interrelationships between Speed Limits, Geometry, and Driver Behavior Final Report November 2018 Sponsored by Midwest Transportation Center Michigan Department of Transportation U.S. DOT Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology About InTrans and CTRE The mission of the Institute for Transportation (InTrans) and Center for Transportation Research and Education (CTRE) at Iowa State University is to develop and implement innovative methods, materials, and technologies for improving transportation efficiency, safety, reliability, and sustainability while improving the learning environment of students, faculty, and staff in transportation-related fields. About MTC The Midwest Transportation Center (MTC) is a regional University Transportation Center (UTC) sponsored by the U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (USDOT/OST-R). The mission of the UTC program is to advance U.S. technology and expertise in the many disciplines comprising transportation through the mechanisms of education, research, and technology transfer at university-based centers of excellence. Iowa State University, through its Institute for Transportation (InTrans), is the MTC lead institution. Disclaimer Notice The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the sponsors. The sponsors assume no liability for the contents or use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The sponsors do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document.
    [Show full text]
  • NCHRP Report 504 – Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted
    NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH NCHRP PROGRAM REPORT 504 Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Practices TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2003 (Membership as of July 2003) OFFICERS Chair: Genevieve Giuliano, Director and Professor, School of Policy, Planning, and Development, University of Southern California, Los Angeles Vice Chair: Michael S. Townes, President and CEO, Hampton Roads Transit, Hampton, VA Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MEMBERS MICHAEL W. BEHRENS, Executive Director, Texas DOT JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN, Commissioner, New York State DOT SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC E. DEAN CARLSON, President, Carlson Associates, Topeka, KS JOANNE F. CASEY, President and CEO, Intermodal Association of North America JAMES C. CODELL III, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet JOHN L. CRAIG, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads BERNARD S. GROSECLOSE, JR., President and CEO, South Carolina State Ports Authority SUSAN HANSON, Landry University Professor of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University LESTER A. HOEL, L. A. Lacy Distinguished Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Virginia HENRY L. HUNGERBEELER, Director, Missouri DOT ADIB K. KANAFANI, Cahill Professor and Chairman, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California at Berkeley RONALD F. KIRBY, Director of Transportation Planning, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments HERBERT S. LEVINSON, Principal, Herbert
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 MAJOR ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT Covering Major Accidents in 2013
    2015 MAJOR ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT Covering major accidents in 2013. National Truck Accident Research Centre FOREWORD The National Truck Accident Research Centre (NTARC) The report focus is limited to NTI losses and, given first reported findings into truck crash incidents NTI’s market penetration, this is a real indicator of in 2002. This independent research facility was industry performance. The interrogation of the NTI established by National Transport Insurance (NTI), claims database focuses upon major crashes from the which continues to be the predominant heavy vehicle 7,500 or so registered claims annually. In real terms it and equipment insurer in Australia. is an examination of the relational databases that are used to manage new heavy vehicle claims every hour This research institution provides the opportunity to of every day, 7 days a week and 52 weeks a year. undertake specific research that provides insights into the cause of serious heavy vehicle crashes. From the earliest of studies, NTARC has reviewed all supporting information describing crash incidents. The It is noted that the transport industry has recently compilation of information gathered by the insurer in recognised 25 years of change following some horrific such cases is extensive. We will report on such criteria road crashes in the 1980’s. as, vehicle configuration, freight carried, driver age and experience, the duration and characteristic of the In 2015, we have safer vehicles, safer speeds, safer journey in question. To ensure consistency for the sake roads, and generally more responsible and safer of comparison, this report will again focus on losses behaviour. Nonetheless, heavy vehicle crash incidents with a severity of $50,000 and greater.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Evaluation of Traffic Sensors Under Indian Traffic Conditions
    DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF TRAFFIC SENSORS UNDER INDIAN TRAFFIC CONDITIONS June 2016 Page | 1 Final Report on DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF TRAFFIC SENSORS UNDER INDIAN TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A sub‐project from the “Center of Excellence in Urban Transport” Sponsored by The Ministry of urban Development, Government of India. IIT Madras June 2016 This work was carried out as part of the activities in the Centre of Excellence in Urban Transport at IIT Madras sponsored by the Ministry of Urban Development. The contents of this report is based on the observation from limited experiments and reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Ministry that funded the project or IIT Madras. This report is not a standard, specification, or regulation. Page | 2 Final Report on DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF TRAFFIC SENSORS UNDER INDIAN TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Dr. Lelitha Vanajakshi Associate Professor Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai 600 036 INDIA Ph: 91 44 2257 4291, Fax: 91 44 2257 4252 E‐mail: [email protected] Dr. Boby George Assistant Professor Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai 600 036 INDIA Mr. Arul Stephen, Mr. Sivasubramaniam, Mr. Ramesh, Mr. Shashi, Mr. Sheik Mohammedali, Mr. Mohamed Badhrudeen and Ms. Ameena Salim Project staff, CoEUT, Dept. of Civil Engg. IIT Madras Chennai 600 036 Page | 3 Executive Summary The rapidly increasing use of vehicles in India, spurred by the population boom and economic upturn has resulted in acute traffic congestion in its urban roads.
    [Show full text]
  • The Choices Between Life & Death
    A choice between life and death Hartman A choice between Life and Death Jenelle Hartman Victoria Police ABSTRACT On 16 April, 2009, a tragic single vehicle collision occurred on the Princess Highway, Heathmere, Australia. On the fateful evening, the driver safely negotiated the 53 seat coach and eleven unassuming passengers around a right curve before continuing into a straight section of road where the vehicle speared onto the incorrect side of the road and into the path of an oncoming vehicle. The driver of the coach input a severe left manoeuvre to avoid colliding with the oncoming vehicle resulting in a loss of control and subsequent rollover of the coach. Five passengers were ejected and three, including a 2 year old child, sustained fatal injuries. The author, a collision reconstruction expert with Victoria police, attended the collision and identified a number of choices which had been made that ultimately led to the death of three people. This paper will look at the circumstances which contributed to the collision and the untimely deaths. The road surface was identified as a significant contributing factor due to skid resistance levels falling well below recommended levels. The road had been identified as being in need of repair in 2004 when another fatal collision occurred at the same location. A funding bid was launched to perform repairs. Due to funding failings, only a partial repair was made. Contractors who performed minor maintenance at the location in February 2009 failed to alert the governing body of the poor road condition. Two months later the tragic collision occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Document 4 Details Relevant for Impact Assessment Of
    Background document 4 Details relevant for impact assessment of 13 sectors CONTENTS Section Instrument Sector Document Page 1A Overview of Options 2 1B Reactive electrical energy meters 3 1C Equipment for the measurement of 7 the speed of vehicles 1D Alcohol breath analysers 17 1E Electrical vehicle chargers 21 1F Energy measurement system for use 27 on board railway vehicles 2A Automatic weighing of road vehicles 35 2B Exhaust gas analysers for 41 motorbikes/diesel engines 3A Water meters 47 3B Alcoholmeters and alcohol 51 hydrometers 3C Medium and above-medium accuracy 55 weights 3D Tyre pressure gauges for motor 59 vehicles 3E Standard mass of grain 63 3F Ships’ tanks 67 Document Page 1 of 70 The ‘Appraisal Summary Tables’ presented in this background document have been prepared by Risk & Policy Analysts as part of a study being undertaken for DG Enterprise & Industry into potential revisions to the Measuring Instruments Directive. In this study, consideration is being given to three options for each instrument sector: Option 1: Baseline The baseline option encompasses three possibilities (as sub-Options): • Option 1a: no regulation or national standards; • Option 1b: national regulation/standards; and • Option 1c: international/European standards. It is, of course, quite possible for the baseline (for individual instrument sectors) to vary from Member State to Member State. Option 2: Co-Regulation Three possibilities are considered (as sub-Options): • Option 2a: EU Standardisation: European standardisation based on international standards
    [Show full text]