Space Technology: Propulsion, Control and Guidance of Space Vehicles. Aerospace Education III. Instructional Unit II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Space Technology: Propulsion, Control and Guidance of Space Vehicles. Aerospace Education III. Instructional Unit II ti DOCUMENT RESUME ED 111 616 SE 017 453 TITLE. Space Technology: Propulsion, Control and Guidance of Space Vehicles. Aerospace Education III. Instructional Unit II. INSTITUTION Air Univ., Maxwell AFB, Ala. Junior Reserve Office Training Corps. PUB DATE Sep 72 NOTE 62p.; For the accompanying textbook, set' SE 017 452 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 BC-$3.32 Pius Postage DESCRIPTORS *Aerospace Education; *Aerospace Technology; Course Organization; Curriculum Guides; Energy; *Fundamental Concepts; *Instructional Materials; *Physical Sciences; Secondary Education; Teaching Guides; Technology; Unit Plan IDENTIFIERS *Air Force Junior ROTC ABSTRACT This curriculuaguide is prepared for the Aerospace Education III series publicatiarentitled "Space Technology: . Propulsion, Contr'al-and Guidance of Space Vehicles."It provides guidelines for each chapter. The guide iddlua4g objectiies, behavioral objectives, suggested outline, orientation, suggestedkey points, suggestions for teaching, instructional aids, projects,and further readings. Page references corresponding to the textbookare given where appropriate. (PS) 71( *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished *materials not available from other sources. ERIC makesevery effort* *to obtain the best copy available. nevertheless, items of marginal * *reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality *. *of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available * *via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). MS isnot * *responsible for the quality of the original document. Reproductions* *supplied by EDRS are the best that can,be made from- the original. * *********************************************************************** U.S MINT OF WEALTH, EDUCATION &WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION TIMS, DOCUMENT HAS SEEN REPRO SEPTEMBER 1972 DUCE° EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE ERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN ATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED CO NOT NECESSARILY RERE SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY INSTRUCTIONAL UNIT II SPACE TECHNOLOGY: PROPULSION? CONTROL AND GUIDANCE OF SPACE VEHICLES INSTRUCTIONAL UNIT OBJECTIVES: EaCh student should a. Know the characteristics of engineswhich use the principle of oxidation in their operation. Understand the differences betweenthrust requirements for 41) launching vehicle from the earthand for movement space. r-4 c. Be familiar withothertypes of propulsion systems., d. Know the methods and problems ofproducing electric power w for use in space vehicles. e. Understand the principles involvedin control, guidance, and navigation of spacecraft. f. Understand the interrelationshipof celestial mechanics and,man-made means of maneuveringspacecraft in various, types of apace flights. PHASES IN INSTRUCTIONAL UNITII: Page I. Vehicles in Aerospace 1 II. Chemical Propulsion and the Basics of.Thrust 8 III.Chemical Propulsion Systems 19 IV. Beyond Chemical Propulsion 28 V. Control and Guidance Systems 37 VI. Pathways Thrbugh Sp.ace 47 5' PHASE I - INTRODUCTION -- VEHICLES IN AEROSPACE This phase reviews and builds upon' background students have acquired in previous units of the Aerospace Education curriculum. It establishes the basis of space flight in Newton's law of gravitation, Kepler's three laws of planetary motion, and Newton's three laws of motion. Then it compares the conditions of aeronautical flight with those of space flight, touching on various aspects of propulsion, control, and guidance that will be treated more fully in later phases. 1. PHASE 1 OBJECTIVES: Each student should dr la. Know Kepler's laws of planetary motion, Newton's law-of gravitation and three laws of motion, and the differences between physical conditions prevailing in air and space. b. Know the meanings of the terms mass, inertia, momentum, friction and acceleration. c. Understand the ways in which these phenomena (listed in b) ,affect or do not affect the'motion of vehicles in air or r pace. d. Be familiar with-the behavior Of vehicles in air or space as: ffected by natural and man-made forces. 2. BEHAVIORAL BJEKWES: Each student should be able to -- a. State Keple 's three laws of planetary motion. b. State Newt.. s three laws of motion and apply them toany example of notion on the ground, in air, or in space. c. Discu the principles of reaction motors, whether of a craft or spacecraft. Compare the conditions of motion in atmosphere d in space with regard to vehicle control, friction, airfo is and streamlining, and propulsion needs for launch an flight. 3. SUGGESTED OUTLINE: a. Principles discovered in the seventeenth century. (1) Gravity and gravitation. (2) Kepler's laws of planetary motion. (3) Newton's.laws of motiorr. (4) Terms associated with these laws: mass, inertia, momentum, friction, and acceleration. b. Vehicles in air. (1) Propulsion. (2) Aircraft control. (3) Missiles and spacecraft in air (a) Escape from atmosphere. (b) Reentry into a here. c. Vehicles in space. I, (1) Propulsion. (2) Control and guidance. 4. ORIENTATION: a. This phase is one of review and introduction, with limited advancement of knowledge over that which might be assumed to be part of the student's background. The average high school 'student growing up in the space age has acquired quite a bit of its lore, but in a somewhat disorganized fashion. Some of it comes from a typical exposure to elementary and junior high level general science courses, some from the unfolding drama of space exploits in the press and television. Specific high school course's' in , physics, chemistry, or mathematics are not assumed to/be . to be part of the student's background. On the other hand, certain specifics of this phase have been touched. upon in previous units of the Aerospace Education curriculum. b. The main object of this introductory phase is to consider and compare the different conditions of aerodynamic and space flight before building a more thorough understanding of,the latter. With this eject in mind, the student should recall what he knows of aerodynamics and aircraft propulsion through study of Theory of Aircraft Flight and Propulsion Systems for Aircraft, in the previous year's curriculum (AE II). His memory may need some prodding in regard to aspects of the space environment and the rudiments of space-vehicle motion as dealt with in Space and the Uni 'rse and Spacecraft and Launch Vehicles, or the revisions these, Aerospace Environment and Spacecraft and Their Boos rs (AE I). Nevertheless, he probably knows (and considers ba- 1) the facts that air has substance, space is essentiay a vacuum, and that weightlessness is a peculiar conditio experienced in space flight. He has probably not thoug 2 4 out at these facts imply in regard to the art of maneel vering a body through space. c. As far as new knowledge is concerned, this phase*)Vciably p esents more explicit statements of Kepler's laws of lanetary motion and Newton's law ofgravitation and laws of motion than the student has previouslyencountered. It offers only a foretaste of knowledgeabout space vehicle propulsion and maneuver to be covered infollowing phases of the unit. 5/SUGGESTED KEY POINTS: (J-9111) pp 2 a. All vehicles, including space vehicles,move in accordance (J-9132)pp 1 125 with physical laws discave in the Seventeenth Century (J-9146)pp 14-15 by Kepler, Galileo, and dwton. Only in the modern space age has man ex erienc many of these laws in action. (1) Gravitation defined by Newton as the attractio bodies in ace with a force proport o the pro- / duct of eir masses and to e- nverse squares of / (J -9033) pp 44-47 the di ances between Gravity is the same thing, but usually d ed as gravitation as we experience t n earth- e overwhelming attraction of the earth pork in tely smaller objects very near to it, with a f that includes a vector for the earth'srotat n. (2) To better understand Newton's law ofgravitatio as it affects celestial mechanics, itisnecessary,t go back to Johannes Kepler, who set down the ws f planetary motion: (a) Planets follow ellipticalpa s 'around the sun. (J -903 ,pp 60-66 (b) A planet's radius vector eeps out.equal areas ,(J-9 2)pp 100-112 in equal time (textbookFig. 2). Putting this (J-9158)pp 22-32 fact more simply, the lanet travelsfaster while closer to the sun. (c) The square of the time it takeseach planet to orbit the sun is proportionalto the cube of its mean distance from the sun. Putting it more simply, inner planets travelat higher velocity .than outer planets; they complete theirorbits faster for tworeasons: the shorter distance traveled and their highervelocity. (3) Newton's law of gravitationand three laws of motion explain not only the Keplerianbehavior of planets and other orbiting bodies but alsoany motion on earth or in spade. The three laws of motionare: 3 (a) A body will either remain stationary or continue prior motion without change of direction or (J-9132)pp 100-125 velocity unless acted upon by an outside force. (b) A change in a body's motion indicates thepresence of a force and is proportional to and in the direction of that force. (c) For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. (4) Mass, inertia, momentum, and acceleration are theterms that describe the behavior of bodies according to New- ton's law in ..../y.at environment. Another term, friction, is important to know for understanding the limits on vehicle motion en earth and in the air. b. Vehicles in a must be adapted to an environment that resists, ap,. ies pressure, and produces friction. (1) For/ar.bodyto move through air, propulsion must be (J-9023H)pp 11-21 constantly applied to overcome resistanceeven if a co ant speed is to be maintained without acceleration. e very limitations of this medium, however, are advan tages in terms of control and maneuverability. (2) Aircraft and rockets in aircan both be maneuvered-by the use of airfoils. A vehicle in air can also regulate its velocity by variations in propulsivepower output without changing course (unlike a vehicle in space).
Recommended publications
  • L AUNCH SYSTEMS Databk7 Collected.Book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM Databk7 Collected.Book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM
    databk7_collected.book Page 17 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS databk7_collected.book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM databk7_collected.book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS Introduction Launch systems provide access to space, necessary for the majority of NASA’s activities. During the decade from 1989–1998, NASA used two types of launch systems, one consisting of several families of expendable launch vehicles (ELV) and the second consisting of the world’s only partially reusable launch system—the Space Shuttle. A significant challenge NASA faced during the decade was the development of technologies needed to design and implement a new reusable launch system that would prove less expensive than the Shuttle. Although some attempts seemed promising, none succeeded. This chapter addresses most subjects relating to access to space and space transportation. It discusses and describes ELVs, the Space Shuttle in its launch vehicle function, and NASA’s attempts to develop new launch systems. Tables relating to each launch vehicle’s characteristics are included. The other functions of the Space Shuttle—as a scientific laboratory, staging area for repair missions, and a prime element of the Space Station program—are discussed in the next chapter, Human Spaceflight. This chapter also provides a brief review of launch systems in the past decade, an overview of policy relating to launch systems, a summary of the management of NASA’s launch systems programs, and tables of funding data. The Last Decade Reviewed (1979–1988) From 1979 through 1988, NASA used families of ELVs that had seen service during the previous decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Accesso Autonomo Ai Servizi Spaziali
    Centro Militare di Studi Strategici Rapporto di Ricerca 2012 – STEPI AE-SA-02 ACCESSO AUTONOMO AI SERVIZI SPAZIALI Analisi del caso italiano a partire dall’esperienza Broglio, con i lanci dal poligono di Malindi ad arrivare al sistema VEGA. Le possibili scelte strategiche del Paese in ragione delle attuali e future esigenze nazionali e tenendo conto della realtà europea e del mercato internazionale. di T. Col. GArn (E) FUSCO Ing. Alessandro data di chiusura della ricerca: Febbraio 2012 Ai mie due figli Andrea e Francesca (che ci tiene tanto…) ed a Elisabetta per la sua pazienza, nell‟impazienza di tutti giorni space_20120723-1026.docx i Author: T. Col. GArn (E) FUSCO Ing. Alessandro Edit: T..Col. (A.M.) Monaci ing. Volfango INDICE ACCESSO AUTONOMO AI SERVIZI SPAZIALI. Analisi del caso italiano a partire dall’esperienza Broglio, con i lanci dal poligono di Malindi ad arrivare al sistema VEGA. Le possibili scelte strategiche del Paese in ragione delle attuali e future esigenze nazionali e tenendo conto della realtà europea e del mercato internazionale. SOMMARIO pag. 1 PARTE A. Sezione GENERALE / ANALITICA / PROPOSITIVA Capitolo 1 - Esperienze italiane in campo spaziale pag. 4 1.1. L'Anno Geofisico Internazionale (1957-1958): la corsa al lancio del primo satellite pag. 8 1.2. Italia e l’inizio della Cooperazione Internazionale (1959-1972) pag. 12 1.3. L’Italia e l’accesso autonomo allo spazio: Il Progetto San Marco (1962-1988) pag. 26 Capitolo 2 - Nascita di VEGA: un progetto europeo con una forte impronta italiana pag. 45 2.1. Il San Marco Scout pag.
    [Show full text]
  • Conestoga Launch Vehicles
    The Space Congress® Proceedings 1988 (25th) Heritage - Dedication - Vision Apr 1st, 8:00 AM Conestoga Launch Vehicles Mark H. Daniels Special Projects Manager, SSI James E. Davidson Project Manager, SSI Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Daniels, Mark H. and Davidson, James E., "Conestoga Launch Vehicles" (1988). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 7. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1988-25th/session-11/7 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONESTOGA LAUNCH VEHICLES by Mark H. Daniels Special Projects Manager, SSI and James E. Davidson Project Manager, SSI launch into space. As such, it represents an Abstract important precedent for all other space launch companies. Several major applications for commercial and government markets have developed recently which In order to conduct the launch, the company will make use of small satellites. A launch solicited and received approvals from 18 different vehicle designed specifically for small satellites Federal agencies. Among these were the Air Force, brings many attendant benefits. Space Services the State Department, the Navy, and the Commerce Incorporated has developed the Conestoga family of Department. Commerce required SSI to obtain an launch vehicles to meet the needs of five major export license, due to the extra-territoriality of markets: low orbiting communication satellites, the vehicle's splashdown point. positioning satellites, earth sensing satellites, space manufacturing prototypes, and scientific Since that time, the company has organized a team experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Scout Nozzle Data Book
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19770010201 2020-03-22T10:22:21+00:00Z NASA CR-145136 SCOUT NOZZLE DATA BOOK by S. Shields DECEMBER 1975 Prepared Under Contract No. NAS1-12500 Task R-52 by VOUGHT CORPORATION Dallas, Texas for NASA National Aeronautics and SpaceAdministration W-NAASTJ FACILITY s cQ INPUT BRANCh A N77-17144 SCOUT NOZZLE DATA BOOK By S. Shields (NASA-CR-145136) SCOUT NOZZIE,DTA BOOK N77-17144 jVought Corp., Dallas, Tex.) 318 p BC: A14/M A01 CSC 21H Un c-las G3/20 13832 Prepared Under Contract No. NASl-12500 Task R-52 by VOUGHT CORPORATION Dallas, Texas for NJASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration 4 REPRODUCEDBy - ' NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVJCE Us- DEPARTMEMJOFCOMMERCE , PRIINGFIELD,-VA. 22.161 FOREWORD This document is a technical program report prepared by the Vought Systems Division, LTV Aerospace Corporation, under NASA Contract NAS1-IZ500. The program was sponsored by the SCOUT Project Office of the Langley Research Center with Mr. W. K. Hagginbothom as Technical Monitor. The author wishes to acknowledge the contributions of Mr. R. A. Hart in the area of Material Process and Fabrication and the SCOUT propulsion personnel in supplying reports and other documentation as well as their efforts in reviewing the various sections of this document. iii Pages i and ii are blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures .............................................................. viii List of Tables .......................................................... ..... xi Summary .. ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pub Date Abstract
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 058 456 VT 014 597 TITLE Exploring in Aeronautics. An Introductionto Aeronautical Sciences. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and SpaceAdministration, Cleveland, Ohio. Lewis Research Center. REPORT NO NASA-EP-89 PUB DATE 71 NOTE 398p. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, U.S. GovernmettPrinting Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (Stock No.3300-0395; NAS1.19;89, $3.50) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$13.16 DESCRIPTORS Aerospace Industry; *AerospaceTechnology; *Curriculum Guides; Illustrations;*Industrial Education; Instructional Materials;*Occupational Guidance; *Textbooks IDENTIFIERS *Aeronatics ABSTRACT This curriculum guide is based on a year oflectures and projects of a contemporary special-interestExplorer program intended to provide career guidance and motivationfor promising students interested in aerospace engineering and scientific professions. The adult-oriented program avoidstechnicality and rigorous mathematics and stresses real life involvementthrough project activity and teamwork. Teachers in high schoolsand colleges will find this a useful curriculum resource, w!th manytopics in various disciplines which can supplement regular courses.Curriculum committees, textbook writers and hobbyists will also findit relevant. The materials may be used at college level forintroductory courses, or modified for use withvocationally oriented high school student groups. Seventeen chapters are supplementedwith photographs, charts, and line drawings. A related document isavailable as VT 014 596. (CD) SCOPE OF INTEREST NOTICE The ERIC Facility has assigned this document for processing to tri In our judgement, thisdocument is also of interest to the clearing- houses noted to the right. Index- ing should reflect their special points of view. 4.* EXPLORING IN AERONAUTICS an introduction to Aeronautical Sciencesdeveloped at the NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • C 136 a Amtsblatt
    ISSN 1725-2431 Amtsblatt C 136 A der Europäischen Union 47. Jarhrgang Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen 14. Mai 2004 Informationsnummer Inhalt Seite I Mitteilungen Kommission 2004/C 136 A/01 Gemeinsamer Sortenkatalog für landwirtschaftliche Pflanzenarten — 9. Ergänzung zur 22. Gesamtausgabe .......................................................................... 1 2004/C 136 A/02 Gemeinsamer Sortenkatalog für Gemüsearten — 3. Ergänzung zur 22. Gesamtausgabe .............. 141 DE Preis: 42,00 EUR 14.5.2004 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 136 A/1 I (Mitteilungen) KOMMISSION GEMEINSAMER SORTENKATALOG FÜR LANDWIRTSCHAFTLICHE PFLANZENARTEN 9. Ergänzung zur 22. Gesamtausgabe (2004/C 136 A/01) INHALT Seite Erläuterungen .................................................... 5 Liste der landwirtschaftlichen Pflanzenarten .................................. 6 I. Betarüben 1. Beta vulgaris L. - Zuckerrübe ....................................... 6 2. Beta vulgaris L. - Futterrübe ........................................ 12 II. Futterpflanzen 4. Agrostis gigantea Roth. - Weißes Straußgras .............................. 14 5. Agrostis stolonifera L. - Flecht-Straussgras ................................ 14 6. Agrostis capillaris L. - Rotes Straussgras ................................. 14 7. Alopecurus pratensis L. - Wiesenfuchsschwanz ............................. 14 8. Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) P. Beauv., ex J.S. et K.B. Presl. - Glatthafer ................. 15 9. Bromus catharticus Vahl - Horntrespe .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Name, a Novel
    NAME, A NOVEL toadex hobogrammathon /ubu editions 2004 Name, A Novel Toadex Hobogrammathon Cover Ilustration: “Psycles”, Excerpts from The Bikeriders, Danny Lyon' book about the Chicago Outlaws motorcycle club. Printed in Aspen 4: The McLuhan Issue. Thefull text can be accessed in UbuWeb’s Aspen archive: ubu.com/aspen. /ubueditions ubu.com Series Editor: Brian Kim Stefans ©2004 /ubueditions NAME, A NOVEL toadex hobogrammathon /ubueditions 2004 name, a novel toadex hobogrammathon ade Foreskin stepped off the plank. The smell of turbid waters struck him, as though fro afar, and he thought of Spain, medallions, and cork. How long had it been, sussing reader, since J he had been in Spain with all those corkoid Spanish medallions, granted him by Generalissimo Hieronimo Susstro? Thirty, thirty-three years? Or maybe eighty-seven? Anyhow, as he slipped a whip clap down, he thought he might greet REVERSE BLOOD NUT 1, if only he could clear a wasp. And the plank was homely. After greeting a flock of fried antlers at the shevroad tuesday plied canticle massacre with a flash of blessed venom, he had been inter- viewed, but briefly, by the skinny wench of a woman. But now he was in Rio, fresh of a plank and trying to catch some asscheeks before heading on to Remorse. I first came in the twilight of the Soviet. Swigging some muck, and lampreys, like a bad dram in a Soviet plezhvadya dish, licking an anagram off my hands so the ——— woundn’t foust a stiff trinket up me. So that the Soviets would find out.
    [Show full text]
  • Algol As Horus in the Cairo Calendar: the Possible Means and the Motives of the Observations
    Open Astron. 2018; 27: 232–263 Research Article Sebastian Porceddu*, Lauri Jetsu, Tapio Markkanen, Joonas Lyytinen, Perttu Kajatkari, Jyri Lehtinen, and Jaana Toivari-Viitala Algol as Horus in the Cairo Calendar: the possible means and the motives of the observations https://doi.org/10.1515/astro-2018-0033 Received Feb 15, 2018; accepted May 04, 2018 Abstract: An ancient Egyptian Calendar of Lucky and Unlucky Days, the Cairo Calendar (CC), assigns luck with the period of 2.850 days. Previous astronomical, astrophysical and statistical analyses of CC support the idea that this was the period of the eclipsing binary Algol three millennia ago. However, next to nothing is known about who recorded Algol’s period into CC and especially how. Here, we show that the ancient Egyptian scribes had the possible means and the motives for such astronomical observations. Their principles of describing celestial phenomena as activity of gods reveal why Algol received the title of Horus Keywords: Algol, Horus, ancient Egyptian Astronomy, variable stars, the Cairo Calendar, hemerologies 1 Introduction ies (Porceddu et al., 2008; Jetsu et al., 2013; Jetsu and Porceddu, 2015), we use only the best preserved continuous calendar which is found on pages recto III-XXX and verso The ancient Egyptian texts known as the Calendars of I-IX of papyrus Cairo 86637.The other texts and fragments Lucky and Unlucky Days, or hemerologies, are literary contained in the same papyrus are ignored from this analy- works that assign prognoses to each day of the Egyp- sis because the connection of these fragments to the main tian year (Wells, 2001a, p117-118), (Leitz, 1994, p1-2) (Bacs, calendar is not apparent and we do not know what year 1990, p41-45) (Troy, 1989, p127-147) and (Helck et al., 1975– they describe, so combining any data points from these 1992, p156).
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Colorado Space Grant Consortium
    December 2009 Colorado Space Grant Consortium Consortium Happenings COSGC is Healthy and Growing! The Colorado Space Grant Consortium is excited to Providing a diverse group welcome four new community of Colorado students colleges into the consortium with experiences in space membership. The addition of to prepare them for our new affiliate institutions was Nation’s future space made possible by a grant from programs. NASA Education through the National Space Grant College and Fellowship Program’s Minor- ity Serving Institution Partner- ship Development Competition. Community College of Aurora, Community College of Denver, Pueblo Community College and Inside Stories: Trinidad State Junior College join the COSGC team through Director’s Corner 2 the ACCESS (Active Community College Experiences for Students 2009 Symposium 3 Colorado Space Grant Director, National Program Assistant, Affiliate in Space) initiative. The new Directors, and students at the Consortium Meeting in Boulder, CO Affiliate Director Focus 4 members officially became affiliate institutions of COSGC by an Mines Moonbuggy 4 unanimous vote at the Annual COSGC Affiliate Member Meeting in Boulder, CO on September 12, 2009. These new affiliate institutions help to expand and diversify the Colorado student population engaged in The Space Foundation’s Space Grant’s hands-on, space hardware programs. Discovery Institute 5 Students at all four new affiliate CSU Rover 6 institutions are already engaged in balloon payload projects at their RockOn! Workshop 6 local campuses. The ACCESS pro- gram is patterned after the successful Robot Challenge 7 DemoSat program which continues to engage students in both balloon Bone Density Study 7 and rocket payloads at affiliate insti- tutions state-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • 19630000838.Pdf
    NASA SP-IO Office of Scientific and Technical Information NA110NAl AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Washington, D.C. • November 1962 front (over: Atlas-Agena B INTRODUCTION THE space research pro­ gram of the United States, leading in the years just ahead to manned exploration of the moon, and in the more distant future to manned exploration of the near planets, turns on the ability of our scientists and en­ gineers to provide the means for p'ropelling useful pay­ loads through the earth's enveloping atmosphere and into the void of space. For this task, launch vehicles of a number of sizes and capabilities are necessary. Con­ sequently, the United States is developing a family of launch vehicles ranging in size and power from the slender Scout to the giant Nova. Obviously, it would be unwise to use a ten-ton truck to carry a few parcels or to risk a break-down by overloading a small truck. Similarly, it would be im­ practicable to use Saturn or Nova to orbit a small, light­ weight group of scientific instruments, or take the risk of failure involved in placing too much weight on any size rocket. Either would be expensive and inefficient. By developing a family of reliable launch vehicles, the Nation will have available the right size for the right job and avoid the expense of employing vehicles that are either larger and more powerful than necessary, or are marginal in power for the job at hand. [ I ] • For each of the nation's launch vehicles, missions have been assigned. These missions range from scientific research and exploration to tasks vitally necessary for the national defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1981 Activities
    Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1981 Activities NOTE TO READERS: ALL PRINTED PAGES ARE INCLUDED, UNNUMBERED BLANK PAGES DURING SCANNING AND QUALITY CONTROL CHECK HAVE BEEN DELETED Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1981 Activities National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 Con tents Page Page Summary ................................ 1 Department of Agriculture ................. 57 Communications ...................... 1 Federal Communications Commission ........ 58 Earth’s Resources and Environment ...... 2 CommunicationsSatellites .............. 58 Space Science ........................ 3 Experiments and Studies ............... 59 Space Transportation .................. 4 Department of Transportation .............. 61 International Activities ................ 5 Aviation Safety ....................... 61 Aeronautics .......................... 6 Environmental Research ............... 63 National Aeronautics and Space Air Navigation and Air Traffic Control ... 64 Administration ..................... 8 Environmental Protection Agency ........... 66 Applications to the Earth ............... 8 National Science Foundation ................ 67 Science .............................. 13 Smithsonian Institution .................... 68 Space Transportation .................. 19 Spacesciences ........................ 68 Space Research and Technology ......... 23 Lunar Research ...................... 69 Space Tracking and Data Services ........ 25 Planetary Research .................... 70 Aeronautical
    [Show full text]
  • CODE WORDS for OVERHEAD ALUMINUM ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS
    Draft 4, distributed Nov 23, 1998 editorial corrections Dec 10th, 1998 editorial corrections Jan 12th, 1999 CODE WORDS for OVERHEAD ALUMINUM ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS SEVENTH EDITION January 1999 Aluminum Association Code Words FOREWORD For many years manufacturers of electrical conductors have assigned code words to their products to aid in identifying the different types and sizes of conductors in catalogs, orders, in- voices and other production and sales records. As the number of different types and sizes of conductors increased over the years, the number of code words increased until by 1960 more than 1,200 such words were in use. In some instances the same words came to be used to designate more than one conductor. With more new constructions, new types of insulation, different tempers and other variations in the offing, there was a potential need for many more code words. Recognizing this situation, the Technical Committee on Electrical Conductor of The Aluminum Association's Electrical Technical Division in 1960 initiated a study aimed at reducing the number of code words required for these products. During its study the Subcommittee considered several different systems. Some would have accomplished the desired reduction in number of code words but were considered too complicated for practical use. The system finally adopted retains the code words now in use but provides for designating variations in construction, temper, and type of covering or insulation by the use of suffixes to existing code words, thus greatly reducing the number of new code words that otherwise would be required in the future. The conductors referenced in Tables 1 through 47 are manufactured in accordance with applicable ASTM Specifications.
    [Show full text]